Search Captions & Ask AI

Scott Galloway Says Iran War is “The Definition of a Quagmire” | Pivot

March 31, 2026 / 01:07:45

This episode of Pivot covers topics such as Cara Swisser's move to Brooklyn, the recent protests across the globe, and discussions about the U.S. military's involvement in Iran. Guests include Scott Galloway and Cara Swisser, who share personal anecdotes and insights on current events.

Cara Swisser talks about her recent move to Brooklyn, mentioning her experiences shopping at IKEA and the local culture of sharing books. Scott Galloway humorously reflects on his limited visits to Brooklyn and their shared experiences in New York.

The hosts discuss the recent protests, noting that around 8 million people participated globally, with significant turnout in Minnesota. They highlight the importance of community engagement and the potential impact of these demonstrations on political change.

Scott Galloway addresses the U.S. military's situation in Iran, expressing concern over the complexities of the conflict and the implications of military presence in the region. He emphasizes the need for strategic planning and coordination with allies.

The episode concludes with discussions about the White House's new app, privacy concerns, and the implications of government surveillance on citizens.

TL;DR

Cara Swisser discusses her Brooklyn move, global protests, and U.S. military issues in Iran with Scott Galloway.

Video

00:00:00
This is kind of the definition of a
00:00:01
quagmire and that is I'm not sure at
00:00:04
this point he has any choice but to put
00:00:06
boots on the ground. I would argue at
00:00:08
this point Cara Iran is winning.
00:00:16
>> Hi everyone. This is Pivot from New York
00:00:18
Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast
00:00:20
Network. I'm Carara Swisser
00:00:21
>> and I'm Scott Callaway.
00:00:23
>> Scott, I have officially left your
00:00:25
apartment in New York State.
00:00:26
>> Oh, you moved into your new place? Yes,
00:00:28
I bought a small apartment in Brooklyn
00:00:30
in
00:00:31
>> Parkrooklyn where all the kid core kids
00:00:33
are.
00:00:33
>> I have to say I enjoyed it. We went this
00:00:35
weekend went to IKEA for 17 hours which
00:00:38
was fun. Actually bought a range of
00:00:40
inexpensive furniture and it's very
00:00:43
lovely actually. We we we it's very
00:00:45
nice. I miss you but I have to move on
00:00:49
from our relation our housing
00:00:50
relationship.
00:00:51
>> So do you know how many times I've been
00:00:52
to Brooklyn in 25 years?
00:00:54
>> How many?
00:00:55
>> Twice. both times to be to go to the so
00:00:57
house there. There's no reason to ever
00:00:58
live the island unless you're going to
00:01:00
JFK or LaGuardia.
00:01:01
>> It's nice. We're very well known in Park
00:01:03
Slope. I can tell you that. I got to
00:01:04
stop.
00:01:04
>> I don't doubt it. Royalty in Brooklyn.
00:01:07
Jesus Christ. I can't even imagine.
00:01:09
>> Hi, Cara. Welcome to Brooklyn.
00:01:11
>> I know. That's exactly what happened. It
00:01:13
was two other things. Let me just say
00:01:15
two other phenomena. So, I have all
00:01:17
these books that I get for my podcast
00:01:19
and probably you do too, right? I I I
00:01:21
cannot get rid of them here. I put them
00:01:23
out on the stoop in Brooklyn. they were
00:01:24
gone. Like I have to say I get all these
00:01:27
free books and they're good books and
00:01:29
they're all interesting, but I have to I
00:01:30
like the whole culture of people walking
00:01:33
by and taking things and giving away
00:01:35
things. It's really nice. So yeah, there
00:01:37
you have it. We are now officially semi
00:01:40
not we don't live there, but it's nice
00:01:42
and anyone can stay. All you listeners
00:01:44
can stay at my Brooklyn place. No, you
00:01:46
can stay. I extend an invitation to you,
00:01:48
Scott Galloway.
00:01:50
>> Happen. Um so gonna happen because it
00:01:52
has a key of furniture. That's why
00:01:54
>> uh you went to IKEA.
00:01:55
>> Yeah, I love IKEA.
00:01:56
>> Um don't uh why why do you like IKEA?
00:02:00
>> Uh cuz it's cuz actually it's f it's
00:02:02
it's perfectly nice stuff. If you get
00:02:04
the the more the slightly more expensive
00:02:06
stuff there, it's fine. And it's it I
00:02:08
don't want I don't want to buy more. I
00:02:10
have really nice furniture in where I
00:02:12
live and I just don't need more
00:02:14
furniture.
00:02:15
>> The when I was there, the IKEA sales
00:02:17
lady wanted to have sex with me, but all
00:02:19
I wanted was a was one night stand.
00:02:22
get it.
00:02:23
>> I don't believe you have an IKEA joke at
00:02:24
the ready.
00:02:25
>> I don't think I've ever been to an IKEA.
00:02:27
It's a phenomena. It's um
00:02:29
>> I still was making a furniture all night
00:02:32
long.
00:02:33
>> I don't know. IKEA for me is is like uh
00:02:37
a porn video and that is I'll never be
00:02:39
able to do the same thing at home. It
00:02:41
just it looks different at IKEA than in
00:02:43
my own home when I try it.
00:02:45
>> Yeah. Well, I'm a lesbian so I can
00:02:46
assemble things. Well, I'm very good
00:02:48
with that.
00:02:49
>> You're
00:02:50
>> Are you building a wood canoe in your
00:02:52
living room?
00:02:52
>> I did. I have to build this bed. I gave
00:02:54
up on it.
00:02:54
>> Woodwork.
00:02:55
>> Yeah. The other thing I did, and I want
00:02:56
to recommend I went to my friend Sean
00:02:58
Hayes's show called The Unknown. And
00:03:00
it's a little bit about internet. It's a
00:03:03
little bit about It's really good. It's
00:03:05
a one-man show. Uh it's a M I think it's
00:03:07
by David Kale, I think, is the
00:03:09
playright. What a wonderful show. I have
00:03:11
to We had a really nice time on this
00:03:12
Broadway.
00:03:13
>> It's off Broadway. He started off
00:03:15
Broadway. I recommend it. The unknown.
00:03:16
My Mexican friend
00:03:18
>> builds all my IKEA furniture. I call him
00:03:20
my instruction I call him my instruction
00:03:22
Manuel.
00:03:24
>> Oh my god. Just go. Okay. All right.
00:03:28
Anyway,
00:03:29
>> at least upgrade to At least upgrade to
00:03:31
West Elm.
00:03:32
>> I have Westm stuff. I have I have uh the
00:03:35
other one.
00:03:36
>> Position the brand of West Elm. It's one
00:03:37
of my first clients.
00:03:38
>> I like Westm actually. They make I have
00:03:40
several I have some I have a West Elm
00:03:41
bed here and I love it. I have
00:03:43
>> You know what the strategy was? Well,
00:03:44
I'm patting myself in the back. I my
00:03:46
first strategy engagement.
00:03:48
>> Oh yeah.
00:03:48
>> Uh out of business school was helping
00:03:50
position the Old Navy brand.
00:03:52
>> And it was pretty easy. 80% of the gap
00:03:54
for 50% of the price. And so my big
00:03:55
insight at William Sonoma 5 years later
00:03:57
was
00:03:58
>> West Elm 80% of Pottery Barn for 50% of
00:04:02
the price.
00:04:02
>> Oh, interesting. It's nicer than Pottery
00:04:04
Barn. I think Pottery Barn sort of lost
00:04:06
the
00:04:06
>> West Elm is the fastest zero to a
00:04:08
billion dollar brands in history have
00:04:10
been that axiom. 80% of the 80% of the
00:04:13
kind of industry leader for 50% of the
00:04:15
price whether it's Southwest or Old Navy
00:04:18
or West Elm.
00:04:19
>> It's West's a little nicer. And then
00:04:20
there's the one room and board which is
00:04:22
nice. I get a lot
00:04:23
>> No, they do a great job.
00:04:23
>> They do be I get a lot of their stuff.
00:04:25
>> Not nearly as successful financially
00:04:27
though.
00:04:27
>> Yeah. And then what's the one that has
00:04:29
uh the big air couch? The big uh
00:04:32
>> Well, Restoration Hardware.
00:04:33
>> Restoration Hardware. I have a that's
00:04:35
that has that has all of my stuff in San
00:04:37
Francisco. I got Restoration. Well,
00:04:39
Gary, I I would I used to be very into
00:04:41
merchandising because I was in that
00:04:42
business. The greatest, in my opinion,
00:04:43
the greatest merchant of the last 20
00:04:44
years is is uh Gary Freriedman, the CEO
00:04:47
of Restoration Hardware.
00:04:48
>> Yeah, he had seen Cloud Couch. It's a
00:04:50
cloud couch.
00:04:51
>> Uh he and I he and I are friends. He he
00:04:53
gave me a tour of their space in um
00:04:56
>> in the meat packing district. They It
00:04:58
was really interesting in the
00:04:59
restaurant, which I think does more
00:05:00
dollars per square foot than the store
00:05:02
combined, but they don't serve alcohol
00:05:04
cuz he said he wanted a safe place for
00:05:06
women to come and just hang out. And
00:05:08
then when when people drink alcohol,
00:05:09
they get rowdy and obnoxious, which I
00:05:11
thought was interesting. They have a
00:05:12
beautiful alcohol
00:05:13
>> in Manhattan, like go to lunch there.
00:05:15
It's nice. Anyway, I have different
00:05:17
levels of furniture depending on the
00:05:18
house. San Francisco is all restoration
00:05:20
hardware. Yeah. Anyway, all right. We'll
00:05:22
move on because we got to get to the We
00:05:24
love furniture
00:05:26
day. No, no. I go I went to IKEA. I I
00:05:29
assembled furniture this weekend.
00:05:30
Anyway, before we get to the news, uh
00:05:33
this weekend around 8 million One thing
00:05:35
I didn't do, I didn't go to a No Kings
00:05:37
rally over because I was assembling a
00:05:38
key of furniture. Over 3,300 events
00:05:41
around the world. I went to the last
00:05:43
one, I think, over 200,000 people
00:05:45
attended the flagship rally in
00:05:46
Minnesota. Incredible crowds. Some signs
00:05:49
uh stand out, including you can't bomb
00:05:51
away bomb your way out of the Epstein
00:05:53
files. My country went to hell and all I
00:05:54
got was this lousy ballroom. and balls
00:05:57
for grabs with a sign that said free
00:05:58
balls for Republicans.
00:06:02
They were I love the signs. I you know
00:06:04
it was really a lot of people. Eight
00:06:05
million people. That's a lot of people.
00:06:07
>> I'm in London. Although they did have a
00:06:08
protest here which I did which I didn't
00:06:10
go to but
00:06:11
>> I don't know. I did what all lazy people
00:06:13
do to virtue signal. I reposted Yeah.
00:06:15
>> I reposted other people sacrificing.
00:06:17
>> No, it was they looked wonderful and
00:06:19
festive. I thought Bruce Spring I
00:06:20
thought they were also did the messaging
00:06:22
was excellent. I thought it was
00:06:23
affordability. It's about no kids. It
00:06:27
was everybody has all the progressives
00:06:29
have modulated in a way that I think is
00:06:31
very attractive. Very they're moving
00:06:33
into the James Terico version of
00:06:36
Democrats, right? The hey, what are we
00:06:38
going to hear to help you affordability?
00:06:40
We want a thing. And the one thing I
00:06:43
really like, there was a picture, a
00:06:44
beautiful picture of Joan Bayz and um
00:06:47
>> uh Jane Fonda that was with gray hair
00:06:50
together was gorgeous. I thought that
00:06:52
was I just thought it was visually very
00:06:54
attractive. I think there is a real
00:06:56
movement of people of all these
00:06:57
elections happening and people are so
00:07:00
sick of feeling bad and feeling like
00:07:03
everything's a grift. It just feels it
00:07:05
there was definitely a tide. I don't
00:07:08
know if these protests help, but I like
00:07:09
them. I think they're
00:07:10
>> supposedly Well, first off, it just
00:07:12
feels and I say this all the time, but
00:07:14
my buddy Dan Harris action absorbs
00:07:16
anxiety. It feels really good to do
00:07:19
things with other people. And Timothy
00:07:21
Snder says that protests start to build
00:07:23
an infrastructure for organization and
00:07:26
taking names and people get invested in
00:07:27
it. So they want to turn out again and
00:07:29
they want to register people to vote.
00:07:31
Also supposedly the supposedly there's a
00:07:34
tipping point where if you get 3 and a
00:07:35
half% of the population to demonstrate
00:07:37
that usually conotes change. So this
00:07:39
wasn't that cuz that would be I think
00:07:40
about 11 or 12 million people. Just some
00:07:42
data here. The October pro protest drew
00:07:46
roughly 7 million and uh Saturday's
00:07:49
turnout was nine million. So it's
00:07:51
building. And what's interesting or the
00:07:52
most piece of data I thought is that
00:07:54
twothirds of the RSVPs came from outside
00:07:57
major urban centers including
00:07:59
>> including conservativeleaning states
00:08:02
such as Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, Utah,
00:08:04
South Dakota, Louisiana.
00:08:05
>> Yeah. Those protests that takes a thing
00:08:08
for people to do things like that there
00:08:09
like the villages. Did you see all the
00:08:11
little villages carts? Yeah. Yeah. That
00:08:13
was kind of cool.
00:08:14
>> What is traditionally very conservative
00:08:16
and also the kind of the flagship was at
00:08:18
uh Minneapolis where almost a quarter of
00:08:21
a million people turned out. Uh
00:08:23
Springsteen performed. You mentioned
00:08:25
Joan Baz and Jane Fonda, Maggie Rogers
00:08:27
and Senator.
00:08:30
>> So just some context, the Women's March
00:08:32
in January 2017,
00:08:34
previously considered the largest single
00:08:36
day protest in US history, drew an
00:08:38
estimated uh 3.3 to 56 5.6 million
00:08:41
people. So this was bigger. The BLM
00:08:44
protest in June of 2020 drew an
00:08:46
estimated 15 to 26 million people, but
00:08:48
over several weeks, but that was spread
00:08:50
across multiple days. So if the 9
00:08:53
million uh person turnout estimate hold,
00:08:56
Saturday's protest would be the largest
00:08:57
single day demonstration in American
00:08:59
history.
00:09:00
>> People are tired and they want to do
00:09:01
something. And it's not it's not
00:09:02
hopeless. I went to the women's one. I
00:09:04
actually I took my sons to that. I made
00:09:07
them wear [ __ ] hats. Well, that's the
00:09:08
way it goes. Anyway, it was we had
00:09:10
actually had a wonderful time. I like
00:09:12
doing things like that with my kids
00:09:13
because they can see things in action.
00:09:15
Okay, moving on. Uh, President Trump
00:09:17
says the US is in serious discussions
00:09:20
with the new regime in Iran, but he's
00:09:21
also threatening to completely destroy
00:09:23
key energy sites if a deal is not
00:09:24
reached. That's a nice way to negotiate.
00:09:27
This is the Pentagon preparing for what
00:09:28
could be weeks of ground operations in
00:09:30
Iran, according to the Washington Post.
00:09:32
Total number of US troops in the Middle
00:09:34
East are now 50,000 around 50,000. That
00:09:36
is insane amounts of people. roughly
00:09:38
10,000 higher than typical levels. Uh
00:09:41
the Iranian military is warning that any
00:09:43
US occupation would lead to captivity,
00:09:45
dismemberment, and disappearance. It is
00:09:47
worrisome with all those people there.
00:09:49
There's always something bad going to
00:09:50
happen. And as the war drags on, markets
00:09:52
are sliding down with NASDAQ and Dow
00:09:53
falling into correction territory last
00:09:55
week and the S&P down about 7%. Markets
00:09:58
are sort of a a trailing indicator of
00:10:00
some of this stuff, I think. But um I
00:10:02
think it it's creates a jittery feeling
00:10:04
just because of the shifting back and
00:10:05
forth. And if you noticed, a lot of
00:10:07
Trump people, especially Marco Rubio and
00:10:09
JD Vance, were not on any of the Sunday
00:10:11
shows. They're avoiding all the cabinet
00:10:13
members are avoiding the Sunday shows.
00:10:16
Um, I had a really interesting interview
00:10:19
before I went to New York with Tom
00:10:20
Tillis, which I think you should all
00:10:22
listen to. It's up today. I mean, he was
00:10:24
expressing great distaste for this whole
00:10:26
action. Um, we had a he's a obviously a
00:10:30
very conservative senator from North
00:10:31
Carolina. He's leaving Congress so he
00:10:33
feels like he can say whatever he wants,
00:10:34
which he did. Um, so what do you think's
00:10:37
happening here, Scott? I mean, the back
00:10:39
and forth and the people are sort of
00:10:42
trying to get out of the Trump blast
00:10:44
zone on this situation. I'm sorry to use
00:10:45
that metaphor, but
00:10:49
>> well, to say it's complicated is an
00:10:50
understatement, but I'm one of the
00:10:52
people that would argue that
00:10:54
>> we've been at war with Iran for the last
00:10:56
47 years. The first act of this regime
00:10:58
in 1979 was to take Americans hostage.
00:11:01
The question is, is this escalation in
00:11:03
the war? Uh, was it a smart idea? And I
00:11:07
think if it had gone 72 hours in terms
00:11:09
of getting some coordination with
00:11:11
European allies and even Gulf allies,
00:11:14
>> you could have potentially declared
00:11:15
victory and really had a win. Um, but
00:11:18
this is kind of the definition of a
00:11:20
quagmire and that is I'm not sure at
00:11:23
this point he has any choice but to put
00:11:25
boots on the ground because I and I had
00:11:27
Senator Warner on my podcast. I would
00:11:28
argue at this point, Cara, Iran is
00:11:31
winning.
00:11:32
>> Yeah, that's that the IRGC has shown
00:11:34
that they can they can push back the,
00:11:36
you know,
00:11:37
>> the great Satans of Israel and the
00:11:40
United States. And what is at the end of
00:11:44
the day, I think this is an enormous
00:11:46
failure of uh our intelligence director
00:11:49
uh Tulsi Gabbard.
00:11:50
>> Yeah.
00:11:51
>> To not contemplate or consider a
00:11:53
scenario where they cut off the straits
00:11:55
of Hormuz. She probably advised that.
00:11:58
She didn't want to go. She's the America
00:12:00
first. Greg, her ad and Vance are on the
00:12:03
maybe not so much kind of group.
00:12:05
>> Yeah, but you okay, but they they're
00:12:07
claiming now that they're going to try
00:12:08
and work with their allies who are all
00:12:10
saying [ __ ] you if you're going to be
00:12:11
this much of a prick to us. But they
00:12:14
they're doing [ __ ] in reverse order.
00:12:15
They should have secured the straits of
00:12:16
foremost before doing this. They should
00:12:19
have contemplated, well, what happens if
00:12:20
they start firing Shihad drones that
00:12:22
cost $20,000 and it cost us 2 million to
00:12:25
shoot them down? What if they start
00:12:26
firing them into Dubai? So some basic
00:12:30
scenario planning and intelligence from
00:12:32
the people char I mean
00:12:34
>> I think he got that. I think some guy
00:12:36
told him to do this like I the
00:12:38
>> there's no leadership that it doesn't
00:12:40
matter if it doesn't bubble up
00:12:41
>> which is what Tillis said. Tillis was
00:12:43
like I he always tries very hard not to
00:12:45
insult Trump himself but he's like the
00:12:47
advisers and he's particularly for
00:12:49
example went after Steven Miller on
00:12:51
immigration. He particularly goes after
00:12:54
the adviserss. He's like he's either you
00:12:56
have an adviser who's stupid and just
00:12:58
like tells them dumb things or you have
00:12:59
an adviser who knows better who says
00:13:01
nothing, right? Who doesn't who tries to
00:13:04
like assuage the president versus and he
00:13:07
goes either way his adviserss suck, you
00:13:09
know? And I think that's true, but at
00:13:12
some point it's treating Trump like a
00:13:13
toddler. Oh, we managed to keep him this
00:13:16
or that. So, it's a complicated
00:13:18
situation there is this guy wants to do
00:13:20
what he wants to do now and he has
00:13:21
advisers who are either too weak to tell
00:13:24
him the truth or tell him the truth and
00:13:26
then get fired or slapped for it kind of
00:13:29
stuff. I don't know. It's a problematic
00:13:30
sit it's not certainly not the the group
00:13:33
of rivals that Lincoln had.
00:13:35
>> Well, but a lot of people would argue on
00:13:37
the opposite side that basically
00:13:39
Secretary Rubio is a shadow president
00:13:41
making these decisions and so is his
00:13:42
son-in-law Kushner. So,
00:13:44
>> right,
00:13:44
>> you know, which is it? Is he listening
00:13:46
to people or is he not? Because it to me
00:13:50
this is just such a striking
00:13:51
intelligence failure to not do some
00:13:53
basic scenario planning around what if
00:13:56
and we are now in a position of weakness
00:13:57
where I mean the general not the
00:14:00
consensus but when I speak to people in
00:14:01
the intelligence community there's a
00:14:04
feeling okay the most obvious next step
00:14:06
here is that he feels to save face
00:14:08
because the RGC has said [ __ ] you you
00:14:10
can pretend you're talking to us we're
00:14:12
not talking back we have dispersed we
00:14:15
anti we did scenario planning we We
00:14:17
anticipated what if our leadership is
00:14:20
killed and they have dispersed military
00:14:22
and executive authority out to the
00:14:25
various regions. So they're like cut off
00:14:26
the head of the snake. That's okay. We
00:14:28
the snake's going to keep moving. So
00:14:30
there was no basic uh essential basic
00:14:33
scenario planning here. And the general
00:14:35
feeling is that he will land troops
00:14:38
potentially on Car Island and then try
00:14:40
and secure Kar and do a deal to exchange
00:14:42
Carg for opening the Straits of Hormuz.
00:14:45
>> Right. No, but that's what we had
00:14:47
before. Like one of the things that
00:14:48
>> I'm not arguing it's we're in a good
00:14:50
spot.
00:14:50
>> One of the things when I talked to
00:14:51
Tillis and when I also talked to Warner
00:14:53
is that the same thing you're talking
00:14:54
about these drones and everything else
00:14:56
like the word obliterate that he
00:14:58
obliterated it months ago the nuclear
00:15:00
facilities but now he's obliterating
00:15:02
more and you know tell us who's sort of
00:15:05
had seems to have run out of [ __ ] was
00:15:06
like yeah we obliterated again and then
00:15:08
we obliterated it like you know
00:15:10
>> you can't that's like to say you
00:15:13
obliterate. All right. So essentially
00:15:14
what you have
00:15:14
>> making fun of Trump. I believe that's
00:15:16
what was happening there.
00:15:17
>> Again the the key word in all of this
00:15:19
coming out of Ukraine and now this war
00:15:22
is asymmetry. And that is wars and
00:15:25
shaping of you know energy routes and
00:15:28
ability to solve things without when
00:15:30
diplomatic means have failed have been
00:15:32
based on very expensive platforms and
00:15:33
technology no one else had access to. It
00:15:36
has gone the entirely other way. And now
00:15:38
you can essentially build a drone for
00:15:41
$20,000 with a two-stroke engine similar
00:15:44
to what's in a motorcycle. And that's
00:15:46
like to say you're gonna obliterate it.
00:15:48
If if we all of a sudden declared war on
00:15:50
Texas and most of the Southwest
00:15:53
actually, which Iran is bigger than, and
00:15:54
said, "Okay, how do you find every
00:15:57
little factory that's pull push pulling
00:15:59
together lawnmowers?" That's what you're
00:16:01
up against. you're not going to be able
00:16:03
and then they launch 40 of these things
00:16:05
and the defense systems get confused and
00:16:07
all you need it's similar similar to the
00:16:09
Department of Homeland Security or the
00:16:11
FBI they have to stop every terrorist
00:16:15
attack right
00:16:16
>> and the notion that just one
00:16:20
>> one
00:16:21
>> one ship is set on fire or the Burj
00:16:24
Khalifa is taken down in Dubai
00:16:26
>> that's all they need and what's actually
00:16:28
stopping this and you can imagine
00:16:31
>> if you're if you're transporting tens or
00:16:34
hundreds of millions of dollars of a
00:16:35
product called oil through a dangerous
00:16:37
area, there needs to be insurance
00:16:40
against that payment against that that
00:16:44
substance arriving at its destination.
00:16:46
In other words, there's cross party
00:16:48
collateralization in insurance. And
00:16:50
right now, I would argue what's actually
00:16:52
holding up the straits of Hormos is I
00:16:53
don't believe any insurance company is
00:16:55
willing to insure these tankers right
00:16:56
now.
00:16:56
>> Yeah, I don't know what I would do if I
00:16:58
was running these companies. Anyway,
00:16:59
we'll see what happens. It's still
00:17:01
confusing and it's gone on far too long.
00:17:03
This confusing and I think that's the
00:17:04
real problem. He's really stuck in a a
00:17:06
quagmire.
00:17:07
>> A quagmire. This is the definition in a
00:17:09
corner.
00:17:10
>> If he had after 72 hours said we've
00:17:13
we've further diminished their ability
00:17:14
to fund proxies. We have substantially
00:17:16
denigrated their launch capabilities. We
00:17:19
have we have made the the the leadership
00:17:22
infrastructure much more insecure and
00:17:24
diminished it vastly. we are now going
00:17:25
to work with our Gulf allies and
00:17:28
European nations to try and maintain a
00:17:30
sense of security and keep in a box. He
00:17:32
probably could have declared at some
00:17:34
level victory.
00:17:35
>> But Scott, chaos follows this guy. The
00:17:37
chaos is his his brand right now.
00:17:39
Anyway, um
00:17:40
>> agreed.
00:17:41
>> Uh let's move on. The boys are uh really
00:17:44
back together. Speaking of which,
00:17:46
speaking of chaos, Elon Musk joined a
00:17:48
phone call with President Trump and
00:17:49
India's Prime Minister Modi about the
00:17:51
Strait of Hormuz. It's unclear whether
00:17:53
Mus spoke on the call and neither
00:17:54
government mentioned his presence in the
00:17:56
official readouts. Meanwhile, as we all
00:17:58
know, SpaceX is preparing to launch the
00:18:00
largest IPO of all time, reportedly
00:18:01
targeting a $ 1.75 trillion valuation,
00:18:04
which is kind of a lot over their
00:18:06
revenues, but okay, fine. That's a Musk
00:18:08
company. Musk reportedly wants to have
00:18:10
investors come to SpaceX's seat
00:18:11
facilities and rocket launches. He does
00:18:13
that a lot. He invites people in to show
00:18:15
off his wares of impressive wares. He
00:18:17
does He's doing that with robotics, too,
00:18:19
which are pretty cool. Um, the company
00:18:21
is also considering limiting share sales
00:18:23
by early investors, a preferential
00:18:25
treatment for investors in Musk's other
00:18:27
companies, which is why they suck up to
00:18:29
him so and reserving a large That's why
00:18:31
they buy Twitter, so they can get into
00:18:33
this. And reserving a large portion of
00:18:35
the shares for individual investors.
00:18:36
That's fine. That's great. Speaking of
00:18:39
making amends with his enemies, text
00:18:41
released as part of Musk's lawsuit
00:18:43
against OpenAI show that Zuckerberg
00:18:44
tested Musk saying, "Looks like Doge is
00:18:47
making progress. I've got our teams on
00:18:48
alert to take down contact doxing or
00:18:51
threatening the people on your team. Let
00:18:52
me know if there's anything I can do to
00:18:54
help. Oh, he does want to content
00:18:55
moderate. Musk hearted the message and
00:18:58
then asked Zucker would be open to
00:18:59
bidding on open AI with him, which the
00:19:01
two seem to have spoken about on the
00:19:03
phone. I mean, these people say one
00:19:05
thing in public and another in private,
00:19:07
but talk first about um the phone call,
00:19:09
then the IPO, and you know, Mark
00:19:11
Zuckerberg will talk to anybody if it
00:19:13
means a deal. So, that's what I think
00:19:14
about that.
00:19:16
I don't I I don't have a problem with
00:19:18
the president inviting people into a
00:19:20
call that he thinks can help achieve the
00:19:22
objectives whether it's someone who has
00:19:24
domain expertise whether Musk is the
00:19:26
right person to have on the call but I
00:19:28
think the president should bring to bear
00:19:29
any resources he thinks going to result
00:19:31
in a more productive conversation
00:19:33
and Modi is probably wants probably
00:19:37
wants uh you know Starlink or maybe Modi
00:19:40
and Musk have a pre-existing
00:19:41
relationship who knows or maybe like you
00:19:43
said he's just showing them off. The
00:19:46
staggering thing for me is I I can't
00:19:49
wait for the S1 because the target
00:19:52
valuation of 1 8 trillion. This company,
00:19:56
you know, it's projected or generated
00:19:59
roughly 15 to 16 billion and about 8
00:20:01
billion in profit in 2025.
00:20:04
That means at the IPO it's trading at
00:20:07
109 times trailing revenue.
00:20:09
>> That's a must company, right? Are you
00:20:11
going to do like you did with Weiwork?
00:20:13
I'd love to see.
00:20:13
>> Oh, but that's more than pound. Oh, no.
00:20:15
No. This is a real company. It might be
00:20:16
overvalued. Yeah.
00:20:18
>> But we work as it scaled lost more
00:20:19
money. This is a company with
00:20:21
unbelievable
00:20:23
product and moes. It's But two things
00:20:25
can be true at once. Is it an
00:20:27
unbelievable company with I think
00:20:28
probably the widest moes in the business
00:20:30
world right now? Absolutely.
00:20:32
>> For now.
00:20:33
>> For now. Um but everyone feels like a
00:20:36
distant number two. Like who's the
00:20:38
number two here?
00:20:38
>> I don't know. I think people will catch
00:20:40
up in this. I think I take a lot
00:20:42
everyone said no when it catch Tesla.
00:20:44
Everyone caught Tesla and it was a lot
00:20:45
faster than we thought. Right.
00:20:46
>> Yeah. But manufacturing manufacturing an
00:20:49
EV versus a launch capability.
00:20:52
>> I just I think
00:20:53
>> you think someone's going to catch up.
00:20:55
>> I think I think Bezos is working on it.
00:20:57
I think a lot of countries there's ones
00:20:59
happening in Europe. I think look it's
00:21:01
not going to be the only one and
00:21:02
everyone's going to be like why are we
00:21:03
you know it's sort of like the Lockheed
00:21:05
problem right? I think a lot of people
00:21:06
think it's an attractive thing. 90% of
00:21:10
launches.
00:21:11
>> I get it. They are the only remember
00:21:13
when he said it.
00:21:14
>> They are the only company in the world
00:21:15
right now that is capable of putting
00:21:17
humans into space.
00:21:18
>> Yep. Yep. And when you look at when you
00:21:20
look at space and whether it's energy or
00:21:23
connectivity or or or space military or
00:21:26
space defense, they're all for a while
00:21:28
going to have to come through SpaceX. At
00:21:31
the same time,
00:21:31
>> no question.
00:21:32
>> At the same time, is it worth
00:21:35
>> Yes.
00:21:35
>> 109 times revenue? I don't
00:21:37
>> situation. Tesla is declining
00:21:39
precipitously and yet it still trades at
00:21:42
a ridiculous.
00:21:43
>> But Musk owns roughly 42% of SpaceX. So
00:21:46
this IPO could make him the first
00:21:48
recorded trillionaire in history. And on
00:21:50
Kyi the odds that he'll become the a
00:21:52
trillionaire this year are 71%. So
00:21:55
there's almost a three in4 chance
00:21:57
according to a lot of people
00:21:59
>> that Musk is about to become the
00:22:01
trillionaire. And that is in my view
00:22:05
really uh troubling uh because I think
00:22:09
as a species we need guard rails and
00:22:13
money directly translates to power and I
00:22:16
don't think any unelected person should
00:22:17
have this much power.
00:22:18
>> Yeah, he definitely pushes himself into
00:22:21
every single aspect of our lives, you
00:22:23
know, in some way and he'll do a
00:22:25
trillion dollars. Say he takes
00:22:26
>> politically he'll be problematic. say he
00:22:29
says, "Okay, I'm I'm going to die soon
00:22:31
and I want to be worth five trillion and
00:22:34
I'm going to I want to I want to decide
00:22:36
who the next president is. I'm going to
00:22:38
take 3% of my net worth, which would be
00:22:42
$30 billion." There's there's evidence
00:22:44
that he had influence on Trump's
00:22:46
election with 250 million.
00:22:48
>> Mhm.
00:22:48
>> So with
00:22:49
>> But he didn't in Wisconsin with 25.
00:22:51
That's a lot in that state. Like I think
00:22:53
it's a mixed bag. When he shows up, it's
00:22:56
a lot of money. When he shows up, it's a
00:22:58
lot of Yeah. No, you know, I think
00:23:00
>> Citizens United and a guy being worth a
00:23:02
trillion dollars.
00:23:02
>> Agreed.
00:23:03
>> Is really scary.
00:23:04
>> It also has effects of if this guy is
00:23:07
he's like the Soros or he's the Soros of
00:23:09
the right essentially now, right on some
00:23:12
level. And I do think it has a negative
00:23:14
impact and and alerts people to this
00:23:17
situation that he I don't think money
00:23:19
buys everything. He's he's failed in a
00:23:21
number of areas like Doge. he's failed
00:23:23
and like he fails quite a bit which of
00:23:25
course is his his brand is I fail and
00:23:27
then I succeed. Um
00:23:29
>> I think in a close election which most
00:23:30
presidential elections are he could
00:23:32
absolutely swing it.
00:23:33
>> He already has he already has had more
00:23:35
impact than any individual in recent
00:23:37
history especially killing people across
00:23:39
the globe with Doge. I mean again I I
00:23:42
it'll we'll see what happens here but
00:23:44
they certainly it's going to be the
00:23:46
blockbuster IPO and it will be
00:23:48
overvalued by a lot given you know
00:23:51
they'll have a lot of the skis to cover
00:23:53
and then they'll have the money to do
00:23:54
so, right? To to sort of create that
00:23:56
moat even wider.
00:23:58
>> Incredible. It's an incredible I won't
00:23:59
even call it a product because what it
00:24:01
really is, it's global infrastructure.
00:24:03
Um they have the largest commercial
00:24:05
satellite constellation. It's no, which
00:24:07
by the way is no longer NASA, it's
00:24:08
SpaceX. And as of May 2025,
00:24:11
Starlink controlled more than 7,600
00:24:13
satellites or 2/3 of all active
00:24:15
satellites in orbit. The majority of new
00:24:18
satellites launched globally in late
00:24:20
2024 were Starlink. And SpaceX plans to
00:24:23
scale to 42,000 satellites. That's up
00:24:25
sixfold.
00:24:26
>> Yep. They control global global
00:24:28
information system.
00:24:29
>> Making Starlink the deacto broadband
00:24:31
backbone in space and projections for
00:24:33
the end of 2025. 6 million subscribers
00:24:36
and 62% of global satellite broadband
00:24:39
revenue um going to one company. And
00:24:42
most competitors can match SpaceX's
00:24:44
price, cadence, or reliability. I know
00:24:46
Facebook has tried uh Amazon has tried.
00:24:49
They're all trying. I I I always feel
00:24:51
like this is these are these high water
00:24:53
marks for these people, but that's I I
00:24:55
you know it you have to hand it to him.
00:24:57
I remember when he talked about it for
00:24:58
the first time to me um that the
00:25:01
creating this two people were talking
00:25:02
about this at the time. Him and oddly
00:25:05
enough Jerry Yang had an investment in a
00:25:07
low and it's the first time I learned of
00:25:09
it. So I got real I learn I I I got
00:25:11
caught up on the topic like what it was
00:25:14
going to do. But Jerry Yang had an
00:25:16
investment in one and it was he's the
00:25:17
first person who talked about it and
00:25:18
then Musk that same year started talking
00:25:21
about it. This was a long long long time
00:25:22
ago and it was really at the time I
00:25:25
remember thinking no one's talking like
00:25:27
this like everyone else was like doing a
00:25:29
[ __ ] dating service or some dumb
00:25:30
thing.
00:25:31
>> It comes down to some very boring
00:25:33
numbers and that is the cost to launch a
00:25:38
kilogram of material usually a satellite
00:25:40
into low earth orbit. And this is what
00:25:44
SpaceX's Falcon Heavy rocket can launch
00:25:47
into a kilogram for. They can launch a
00:25:49
kilogram into space for $1,500.
00:25:53
Uh Aron's 5G, it costs them $9,200.
00:25:58
Their Electron product cost $19,000.
00:26:01
Their launches, SpaceX's launches occur
00:26:03
every 2 to three days. No other provider
00:26:04
is within range. So they are they are 6x
00:26:09
less expensive. The Chinese certainly
00:26:11
have capabilities here. So anyway,
00:26:13
>> do they I don't know that much about
00:26:14
Chinese.
00:26:15
>> They do they and so you know one of the
00:26:17
things it'll be interesting to see what
00:26:18
happens here and what the these forces
00:26:21
are really powerful and he is very
00:26:23
powerful single person. It does put him
00:26:25
at great risk too of being a not just
00:26:28
not a physical target. That's not what
00:26:30
I'm talking about. But when something
00:26:31
like this happens there's always forces
00:26:33
against it that I think that we that
00:26:36
will start to build. He becomes and he
00:26:39
becomes soros. He becomes Soros in a
00:26:41
weird way.
00:26:42
>> But I I feel much more benign about
00:26:43
Soros. Why do you
00:26:44
>> I do too, but I'm talking about to the
00:26:46
right he or the Koch brothers like pick
00:26:48
pick whatever one who's or Henry Ford
00:26:51
back in the day. There was also a Texas
00:26:52
billionaire and I can't remember his
00:26:54
name a million years like in the 20s
00:26:56
that did stuff like that.
00:26:57
>> But there's a different like so and cork
00:26:59
the Koch brothers they were all quite
00:27:01
philanthropic.
00:27:02
>> Well not him not not Elon for sure. Musk
00:27:05
is not. And Musk is infinitely more
00:27:08
powerful and has a technology that can
00:27:10
basically decide
00:27:11
>> wars. And this is a guy who is
00:27:13
reportedly addicted to ketamine. What
00:27:14
could go wrong?
00:27:15
>> Things are wrong. Let me just tell you,
00:27:17
I'm glad.
00:27:17
>> It does feel like a bond film, but less
00:27:19
than is glad she's in Park Slope. I'll
00:27:21
be protected by the lesbian.
00:27:22
>> Oh yeah, you're safe in Brooklyn. Yeah.
00:27:24
A nuclear device gets detonated 500
00:27:26
meters above Midtown. Yeah, Brooklyn's
00:27:28
going to be fine.
00:27:29
>> No, what I mean is that like if he's
00:27:30
coming after me, he's he's not a fan of
00:27:32
Caris Swisser. Um, but maybe you should
00:27:35
make nice with them.
00:27:36
>> That's what I don't get about I talked
00:27:37
to one of these guys that is building
00:27:39
the bunker in New Zealand, a guy, you
00:27:40
know, and
00:27:41
>> and I'm like, you realize if [ __ ] gets
00:27:43
real
00:27:44
>> and you fire up the G650 and had to
00:27:48
peace out to New Zealand, you realize
00:27:49
your your pilots are going to kill you
00:27:51
and [ __ ] your wife, right?
00:27:52
>> That's correct.
00:27:53
>> And the table went quiet.
00:27:55
>> I know. I said that to one of them who
00:27:56
had a plan. I said, "What's your plan?"
00:27:58
I said, "I'm going to kill you and take
00:27:59
your motorcycle out to your
00:28:01
>> [ __ ] your wife." I was like, "Of
00:28:03
course." And then they were like, "You
00:28:04
could see them calculating, how do I
00:28:05
stop Cara from killing me?" I said, "You
00:28:06
won't see me coming."
00:28:08
>> You think if if if the [ __ ] goes to
00:28:10
where these think people think it's
00:28:12
going
00:28:12
>> Yeah.
00:28:13
>> This the people who die right away are
00:28:15
the lucky ones.
00:28:16
>> I Exactly. I sometimes think that living
00:28:18
in Washington, I feel okay about that.
00:28:20
Anyway, let's not go there. Let's not go
00:28:22
there. Congratulations, Elon Musk, on
00:28:24
your SpaceX victory.
00:28:26
>> You're still terrible person. No matter
00:28:28
how rich you get, you're completely
00:28:30
unlikable. Anyway, oh, I have to say one
00:28:32
Brooklyn thing. So, I was it was there
00:28:35
was this crazy cyber truck parked across
00:28:37
the street. I thought, "Oh, who's doing
00:28:38
this?" Right where my apartment is and
00:28:41
it was tricked out. It was all manner of
00:28:42
[ __ ] on it. I didn't know. It was some
00:28:44
sort of commercial thing. And you know,
00:28:46
there's a bunch of teen boys and they
00:28:48
weren't they were just hanging out and I
00:28:50
thought first they were like admiring it
00:28:52
and what was really funny is and they
00:28:54
weren't they weren't sort of typical
00:28:56
parks. I'm trying to like they were they
00:28:58
were sort of sitting in front of it like
00:29:00
talking about it. I'm I went over and
00:29:02
I'm like what do you think? And I wasn't
00:29:03
making an opinion. They're like what a
00:29:05
douche. And it was like they were like
00:29:08
it was interesting because I just
00:29:09
interviewed Louis Thorough uh Thoru. Uh
00:29:11
who's Justin.
00:29:12
>> Oh you you interviewed about the
00:29:13
manosphere.
00:29:14
>> Yes. Exactly.
00:29:15
>> You're beating me to my content.
00:29:16
>> I'm so sorry. I'm way ahead of you.
00:29:18
>> How was it? That's Justin's cousin.
00:29:20
>> Fantastic. I know it's Justin's cousin.
00:29:22
Um he's also a great filmmaker. Uh, I
00:29:24
got to say was really interesting is one
00:29:26
the point thing you pointed out is even
00:29:27
though a lot of these manosphere guys
00:29:28
are really popular, there's also a whole
00:29:30
group of young men who are like they
00:29:33
they mock them and enjoy being in on the
00:29:36
joke and mocking them at the same time
00:29:38
and also liking some of it but mocking
00:29:40
them. And that was going on in front of
00:29:42
the Cybertruck. They're like is such a
00:29:44
douche but like whatever. And they were
00:29:46
so cool and I was like, "Oh, I feel so
00:29:48
much better about you after talking to
00:29:50
these guys because they were so cool and
00:29:53
they also were in on the joke and I
00:29:56
don't know, I just felt better." Anyway,
00:29:57
yes, Louis. Yes, it was great. And we
00:29:58
talked of you
00:30:00
>> just so you know.
00:30:01
>> Good. I'm glad I'm supposed to have him
00:30:03
on. I wrote a my number. I wrote a
00:30:05
review of the of the show.
00:30:06
>> I loved it.
00:30:08
>> Yeah, it was really illuminating for me.
00:30:10
>> Can I tell you the one line I loved the
00:30:11
best of all? I liked his I like his
00:30:13
interview style and I was actually
00:30:14
looking at as a professional how he does
00:30:16
the interview style. I agree.
00:30:17
>> When he's work when he's HS whatever tdy
00:30:21
whatever ticky talkie whatever tick-
00:30:23
tockie um he was working out and he goes
00:30:26
is this your leg day he's British and
00:30:28
the guy goes of course it is you know
00:30:31
like like an [ __ ] and like shows off
00:30:33
his thigh which is quite a beefy thigh
00:30:36
>> and Louis Lou Louisie looks at him and
00:30:39
he goes you could work on those calves
00:30:41
and the guy just melts and I was like I
00:30:43
love you Louis thu I love him pronounced
00:30:46
it through. Unlike Justin, they
00:30:48
pronounce it differently. Um,
00:30:50
>> anyway, it he has all these lines like
00:30:52
that in there that he just eviscerates
00:30:54
these people with kindness in a way
00:30:55
that's really
00:30:56
>> Yeah, I agree.
00:30:57
>> It's a really good show. Anyway, uh
00:31:00
Elon, good luck. Anyway, uh let's go. Uh
00:31:03
Elon, you could work on your calves. Uh
00:31:05
okay, Scott, let's go on a quick break.
00:31:07
When we come back, Anthropic scores a
00:31:09
win against the Pentagon. Support for
00:31:12
this show comes from Framer. Your
00:31:13
website can set the tone for your brand
00:31:15
and it's the one touch point that every
00:31:16
single one of your customers sees on the
00:31:18
daily. So if you still struggle to make
00:31:20
small changes or simple updates, you're
00:31:22
potentially leaving opportunities on the
00:31:24
table. That's why so many companies are
00:31:26
turning to Framer, the website builder
00:31:28
that turns your from a formality into a
00:31:30
tool for growth. Framer is an
00:31:32
enterprisegrade noode website builder
00:31:34
used by teams at companies like
00:31:36
Perplexity and Miro to move faster. With
00:31:38
real-time collaboration, a robust CMS
00:31:40
with everything you need for great SEO
00:31:42
and advanced analytics that include
00:31:44
integrated AB testing, your designers
00:31:46
and marketers are empowered to build and
00:31:48
maximize your.com from day one. Changes
00:31:50
to your Framer site go live to the web
00:31:52
in seconds with one click without help
00:31:54
from engineering. So whether you want to
00:31:56
launch a new site, test a few landing
00:31:58
pages, or migrate your full.com, Framer
00:32:00
has programs for startups, scaleups, and
00:32:02
large enterprises to make going from
00:32:04
idea to live site as easy and fast as
00:32:06
possible. Learn how you can get more out
00:32:08
of your.com from a framer specialist or
00:32:11
get started building for free today at
00:32:13
framer.com/pivot
00:32:14
for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan.
00:32:17
That's framer.com/pivot
00:32:19
for 30% off. framer.com/pivot.
00:32:23
rules and restrictions apply.
00:32:26
Scott, we're back anthropic to score a
00:32:28
win in his fight with the Trump
00:32:29
administration. Obviously, a federal
00:32:31
judge in California granted a
00:32:33
preliminary injunction temporarily
00:32:34
blocking the Pentagon's efforts to label
00:32:36
the company a supply chain rest. The
00:32:38
judge didn't mince words in her ruling,
00:32:39
saying, "This is a classic illegal first
00:32:41
amendment retaliation." Exactly. She
00:32:44
also called it a quote Orwellian notion
00:32:46
to brand an American company a potential
00:32:48
adversary for expressing disagreement.
00:32:50
The Pentagon is pushing back, expected
00:32:51
to appeal, of course, with senior
00:32:53
official Emil Michael, another Loathome
00:32:55
character, tweeting, "The ruling is a
00:32:57
disgrace." Oh, Emil, get over it. The
00:33:00
final decision in this case could still
00:33:02
be months away. There's also a second
00:33:03
lawsuit pending in DC. Anthropic won the
00:33:06
battle. You know, it's it's problematic
00:33:08
to be in this ridiculous fight. I think
00:33:10
it'll be over by midterms when they they
00:33:12
jack Hegath out of the place. But also a
00:33:15
potent and Emil too also a potential
00:33:18
factor. Anthropic is reportedly
00:33:19
considering going public as soon as
00:33:20
October. That is problematic for them.
00:33:23
Um so what do you what do you and
00:33:25
related a federal judge has put on hold
00:33:27
the $6.2 billion merger between Nextar
00:33:30
and Tegno which would create the largest
00:33:31
operator of local TV in the country 69%
00:33:34
o over the former 30ome percent amount
00:33:37
you're allowed to um bring together. The
00:33:40
judge granted a request from Direct TV
00:33:42
arguing the merger violates antitrust
00:33:44
laws. A 14-day restraining order has
00:33:46
been issued and a hearing is scheduled
00:33:47
for April 7th. Eight attorneys general
00:33:50
have filed a separate lawsuit. Um, I'm
00:33:53
going to just play this. Let's listen to
00:33:55
what our least favorite FCC chair,
00:33:57
Brenda Carr, I'm sorry, Brendan Carr,
00:33:59
uh, had to say at CPAC.
00:34:02
>> President Trump took on the fake news
00:34:03
media and President Trump is winning.
00:34:05
Look at the results so far. PBS
00:34:08
defunded. NPR defunded. Joy Reed gone
00:34:12
from MSNBC.
00:34:14
Sleepy Eye Chuck Todd gone. Jim Acasta
00:34:17
gone. John Dickerson gone. Coar is
00:34:20
leaving. CBS is under new ownership. And
00:34:23
soon enough, CNN is have new ownership
00:34:25
as well.
00:34:25
>> Boy, this guy is just just not doing his
00:34:27
job. Honestly, it's seriously he's such
00:34:29
a suckup to the Trump administration.
00:34:31
He's just explicit about it. And he's
00:34:33
also not very smart. He's a [ __ ] Um,
00:34:35
so talk about these these next star the
00:34:37
the anthropic thing. It looks like
00:34:39
everything as usual Trump does he does
00:34:41
something aggressive and stupid and
00:34:43
loses in court, but he still does
00:34:45
damage. So talk and then you can talk
00:34:48
about Brenda if you want, but that's up
00:34:50
to you.
00:34:50
>> Well, I'll go in reverse order. Brenda
00:34:52
Carr has no business in the federal
00:34:53
government. You're you're not supposed
00:34:54
to go into the government to use it as a
00:34:57
means of attacking your political
00:34:58
enemies and freedom of speech.
00:35:00
>> Yep. I mean, just the notion
00:35:03
this guy makes gals look thoughtful and
00:35:05
that is the directly calling out people
00:35:08
who don't agree with your political
00:35:09
views and then weaponizing government to
00:35:11
try and get people whose views you don't
00:35:14
agree with off the air. That's I it's
00:35:18
like it's just so blatant. It's okay.
00:35:21
So, when we get to appoint an FCC chair,
00:35:25
we're going to go after Hannity. And
00:35:27
>> I mean, is that is that where we're
00:35:29
headed? You want us to start blather on
00:35:31
this idiotic stuff. I don't care. He
00:35:33
annoys me.
00:35:33
>> No. Look, with it's just not qualified
00:35:37
to be in government. With respect to
00:35:39
anthropic, most major AI companies have
00:35:41
bent the knee to the government and
00:35:43
worked with them in any any military
00:35:46
context. I want last year, Google
00:35:47
dropped its ethical guidelines that
00:35:49
included a list of applications it would
00:35:51
not pursue, including weapons and
00:35:53
surveillance,
00:35:53
>> but it used to be able to do so without
00:35:56
a problem.
00:35:57
>> Is that right? And then they put in
00:35:58
guidelines and then they I thought they
00:36:00
were they relaxed their guidelines.
00:36:02
>> They did relax them. But I'm saying they
00:36:03
used to be able to say no and nobody had
00:36:05
a problem. They just didn't work for
00:36:07
them. That's all.
00:36:08
>> Well, that's the whole point of private
00:36:09
enterprise. You get to choose your you
00:36:10
can fire your clients. Just the way
00:36:12
consumers get to pick companies,
00:36:13
companies get to pick their consumers
00:36:15
unless it's based on sexual orientation
00:36:16
or race or what have you.
00:36:18
>> Meta changed its policy to allow US
00:36:20
government agencies and contractors to
00:36:22
access its llama models for national
00:36:24
security purposes. Open AI, which once
00:36:27
stated its goal was to benefit humanity
00:36:29
as a whole, now has multiple contracts
00:36:31
with the military and defense
00:36:33
contractors. And by the way, I don't I I
00:36:35
I don't mind when companies like
00:36:38
Palunteer say, "We're going to work with
00:36:40
the government on in the defense
00:36:41
department." I get it, but you should
00:36:44
also have the right to not to. I don't.
00:36:46
So Anthropic is really they're the only
00:36:49
major AI company that has drawn a public
00:36:51
line on autonomous weapons and mass
00:36:53
surveillance and now it's the only one
00:36:55
being punished for it
00:36:56
>> but it's also winning in court which is
00:36:57
good but it's still is it problematic
00:36:59
for the IPO from your perspective?
00:37:02
>> Well IPO the the the threat to the IPO
00:37:06
is a bunch of companies say there is
00:37:08
there all there are alternatives out
00:37:10
there. We appreciate your stand Dario
00:37:14
but for the time being we're not
00:37:16
expanding our enterprisewide
00:37:18
relationship with you because we don't
00:37:19
want to be put on a list
00:37:20
>> right
00:37:21
>> uh now having said that having said that
00:37:24
again see above what I believe is the
00:37:26
biggest commercial opportunity in
00:37:29
decades is um to say no and if you look
00:37:34
at what's happened to Anthropic they're
00:37:36
now getting 70 cents on the dollar of
00:37:38
every new AI dollar being allocated to
00:37:41
AI from the enterprise. So, it looks as
00:37:44
if their ability to say no and get a
00:37:46
court to say, "Yeah, this is [ __ ]
00:37:48
This is socialism, cronyism, whatever
00:37:50
you want to call it, it looks like it's
00:37:52
it's setting up really I think anthropic
00:37:55
right now. I've said that I think
00:37:56
anthropic at this anthropic at this
00:37:58
moment is worth more than open AI." What
00:38:02
happens is the mark that people invest
00:38:04
at is a bit elucory because if they get
00:38:06
a preferred return, meaning no matter
00:38:08
what happens, they get their money out
00:38:10
sooner or they're getting a guaranteed
00:38:12
17.5% return, which is what Sam is
00:38:15
offering to private equity firms, then
00:38:17
that $850 billion number is a bit of a
00:38:21
head fake because as long as I'm getting
00:38:22
17.5% regardless of what it goes public
00:38:25
at, but I would argue right now the an
00:38:28
the momentum around anthropic is really
00:38:32
strong and the momentum around open AI
00:38:35
is really uh is really weird.
00:38:37
>> So you think it won't affect it? What
00:38:38
about the next star thing? Speaking of
00:38:40
mor on Brendan,
00:38:42
>> well we heard I was actually really
00:38:44
moved. A lot of people pushed back on my
00:38:45
comments about how local news is a dying
00:38:47
business and a lot of people push back
00:38:49
and said
00:38:50
>> I hate to hear this. It's a it's really
00:38:52
important work. And also to be fair,
00:38:56
you know, there's a lot of local
00:38:57
corruption
00:38:59
that and the only check on it is local
00:39:01
news. You know, seven I remember seven
00:39:03
on your side.
00:39:04
>> Seven on your side.
00:39:05
>> From the hills to the seas to the San
00:39:06
Gabriel Mountains. I'm Jerry Dumpy.
00:39:08
>> Yeah.
00:39:09
>> Who by the way, Ted Baxter from Mary
00:39:10
Tyler Moore was based on supposedly
00:39:12
wasn't supposedly Jerry wasn't very
00:39:13
smart. Um but he had broad shoulders and
00:39:16
just made it all the time. I love Dorian
00:39:18
Gensler in DC when I was in college. And
00:39:20
they also had Bruce Herschensson and Jim
00:39:22
Tunny and Point Counterpoint. And that
00:39:24
27 minutes of real news was bested by
00:39:27
the 3 minutes of two people arguing like
00:39:29
crazy.
00:39:31
>> If it had been that era, you and I would
00:39:33
have been a good local news team. Like
00:39:35
>> I would have predicted hail the size of
00:39:37
of canned tomatoes. I I would have loved
00:39:39
being a weatherman. I actually took
00:39:40
meteorology my senior year when I was
00:39:43
trying to figure out what the [ __ ] to do
00:39:44
with my life my senior year in college.
00:39:47
I thought I could be a weatherman and I
00:39:49
took meteorology.
00:39:51
>> I thought I was thinking about a
00:39:54
weatherman.
00:39:54
>> I was going to go in the military and
00:39:56
you were going to be a weatherman and
00:39:57
here I am.
00:39:58
>> Perfect. Yeah. David Letterman started
00:40:00
as a weatherman. Anyways, but we got
00:40:02
push back saying how important or I got
00:40:04
pushed back saying how important local
00:40:06
news is. And so I agree they they do a
00:40:10
great job that you know God be with you.
00:40:12
Um
00:40:13
>> so next star Ta.
00:40:15
>> Okay. Sorry. A judge has temporarily
00:40:17
blocked what is it a $6 billion merger?
00:40:19
>> Yep. 6 months.
00:40:20
>> Between Nextar and Tegna, which would
00:40:22
create the largest operator and uh the
00:40:27
number from 30ome% to 69%.
00:40:30
>> Yeah. 2/3. Basically, they'll have a
00:40:31
lock on it. And a US District judge uh I
00:40:34
think it's in Sacramento granted uh
00:40:36
temporary restraining order siding with
00:40:38
Director V who argued Directory V. God,
00:40:40
they're still around. Which argued the
00:40:42
merger violates federal antitrust laws
00:40:44
and eight eight state attorney generals
00:40:47
led by California's Rob Bont filed a
00:40:49
separate lawsuit. And then no uh in the
00:40:52
ruling he noted that companies do not
00:40:55
contest the merger will increase
00:40:56
NextStar's bargaining leverage to
00:40:58
extract higher fees. And what does the
00:41:00
ruling mean? It means that Nextar and
00:41:02
Tegna can't integrate options integrate
00:41:05
operations for 14 days. A hearing is set
00:41:07
for April 7th to decide whether to issue
00:41:08
a preliminary injunction. So like you
00:41:11
said, if if the merger goes through,
00:41:12
NextStar would own roughly 260
00:41:14
television stations across the country,
00:41:16
reaching about 60% of US households. And
00:41:19
like you said before, it was about 39%.
00:41:22
And the deal does violate FCC rules
00:41:24
limiting how many stations a single
00:41:26
company can operate.
00:41:27
>> Brenda let it through, but go ahead.
00:41:30
Well, so as we as we said, look, it's
00:41:34
not a great business to be in unless
00:41:35
you're in a swing district where they
00:41:37
just basically start trying to advertise
00:41:39
like crazy. Less than half of television
00:41:40
stations report generating any profits
00:41:43
from news. And last year, about 40% of
00:41:45
surveyed local television stations
00:41:47
reported decreasing their news budget.
00:41:49
And local television has lost, get this,
00:41:51
about half of its media spending market
00:41:53
share since since 2017. The business has
00:41:57
been cut
00:41:58
>> in half in the last nine years and as of
00:42:00
June last year
00:42:01
>> local TV accounted for just 6% of total
00:42:04
media spend. Digital video digital video
00:42:06
on the other hand accounts for about
00:42:09
50%. So I look I I don't
00:42:13
I mean it we're going to I think at some
00:42:15
point we got to end up with and people
00:42:17
hate the BBC but I like a certain amount
00:42:20
of public funding.
00:42:21
>> I'm troubled right now. We should talk
00:42:22
about that but later another time. a
00:42:24
certain amount of public funding for
00:42:27
what I'll call
00:42:28
>> local
00:42:29
>> yeah local public news. I think there's
00:42:32
like what Craig Newark did I I think is
00:42:34
really important and I I don't know if
00:42:36
it's a philanthropist. I don't know if
00:42:37
it's government funding like we do at
00:42:39
the BBC here with a house tax.
00:42:41
>> I don't think anyone should own 60% of
00:42:43
any industry even
00:42:45
>> that does feel uncomfortable even I
00:42:47
don't care. They can they can eke out a
00:42:48
good little business from it and and
00:42:51
influence things in ways that just and
00:42:52
they're also they're the ones that sort
00:42:54
of sucked up to Brenda during the Kimmel
00:42:56
thing. Yeah.
00:42:57
>> Yeah. You know, I just nobody I don't
00:42:59
want a liberal running 60%. I don't want
00:43:01
anybody like I just feel like it needs
00:43:03
to be dispersed. Even if that problem is
00:43:06
like a lot of media, it's a bad business
00:43:08
if you don't have monopolies. Um and
00:43:11
then it's just an okay business. I I
00:43:13
don't know whatever it's I hope they
00:43:14
stop it, but they're not going to. But
00:43:16
nonetheless, I hope then the industry
00:43:18
dies and I hope there
00:43:19
>> I'm just wonder entrepreneurial local
00:43:22
efforts going on. And there are a lot of
00:43:24
them by the way across the country in
00:43:26
Mississippi and Baltimore. So let's just
00:43:29
have new stuff and forget these these
00:43:31
compromised
00:43:32
>> I'm shocked you didn't bring up Vox. The
00:43:34
our companies in play.
00:43:35
>> Oh yes. Oh yes. Would you like to
00:43:37
discuss that?
00:43:39
>> Uh well I I have first off let me say I
00:43:41
have absolutely no insider information
00:43:42
here. Um
00:43:43
>> and I have a lot.
00:43:44
>> You have a lot. I'm on the outside.
00:43:47
>> Supposedly Vox is in discussions with
00:43:48
Comcast who's an existing shareholder to
00:43:51
take
00:43:51
>> Versent not Comcast
00:43:52
>> I'm sorry Versant. Yeah. Which owns
00:43:55
>> like Quasant
00:43:56
>> MSNBC and CNBC to take the pods. Then
00:43:59
they would sell the digital business and
00:44:02
also sell off NY. And the way I would
00:44:04
loosely describe it is the digital stuff
00:44:07
is a shitty business getting worse.
00:44:09
Anytime you're dependent upon Amazon,
00:44:12
Meta, and Google, eventually they will
00:44:15
screw you and take all the margin. Uh
00:44:17
those are difficult businesses. The New
00:44:19
York Magazine is a trophy asset. What do
00:44:21
I mean by that? There is some crypto or
00:44:24
hedge fund douche that will pay an
00:44:26
extraordinary amount of money to own New
00:44:28
York Magazine.
00:44:29
>> There's a lot of people. It does well,
00:44:30
too. It doesn't It's not like a big
00:44:32
>> It'll trade at an irrational price.
00:44:34
>> Yeah, it will.
00:44:35
>> Football teams make no money. They got
00:44:37
sold for five, seven, and 10 billion
00:44:38
dollars because some guy wants to go
00:44:39
from being an overweight tech guy to the
00:44:42
sexiest man in Cleveland by owning the
00:44:43
Browns overnight.
00:44:44
>> Okay. Can I just say it's also a really
00:44:46
good journalistic enterprise and it does
00:44:48
okay. I'm sorry. I'm going to
00:44:49
>> Okay. It It won't go for an okay price.
00:44:51
I'm I'm saying it'll go for no It'll go
00:44:53
it'll go for an irrational price.
00:44:55
>> It's a nice property.
00:44:56
>> The new owner is not going to be into it
00:44:58
for the cash flow or for journalism. The
00:45:00
new owner is going to be someone who
00:45:02
wants to say I own NY Mag. It's like
00:45:04
going billionaires own football teams.
00:45:06
Democrats own media companies. It'll go
00:45:08
for
00:45:09
>> So Scott will be buying it soon.
00:45:10
>> It's a trophy asset.
00:45:12
>> It's a No, I'm sponsoring the Met Gala.
00:45:14
I don't know if you heard. And I'm
00:45:16
taking Emily Rodicowski. If that's what
00:45:18
it takes
00:45:20
her because you didn't introduce
00:45:21
yourself when you were in her presence.
00:45:23
>> I got is I got texted Vanessa Freeman
00:45:25
who I think is a wonderful writer that
00:45:26
covers fashion text me. He's like, "Do
00:45:28
you have any thoughts on the Met Gale
00:45:30
and Jeff Bezos?" I'm like, tech has way
00:45:32
too much money, way too little cool.
00:45:34
Fashion has way too little money, way
00:45:36
too much cool. This is an exchange of
00:45:38
value.
00:45:38
>> Yes. A good quote. Good.
00:45:40
>> This is the most expensive midlife
00:45:42
crisis in history. Wouldn't it be easier
00:45:44
for these guys just to buy a Ferrari and
00:45:45
start banging their assistance
00:45:47
>> or penis enhancement
00:45:48
>> versus sponsoring the medala? But
00:45:50
anyways,
00:45:50
>> back to New York. Yes, it will sell. We
00:45:52
know this. So,
00:45:53
>> so NY Mag will go for an irrational
00:45:55
price.
00:45:56
>> My arm
00:45:56
>> and then the trophy assets. And I'm not
00:45:59
talking my own book here because PropG
00:46:00
is independent. We just sell our ads
00:46:02
through Vox, but Pivot is co-owned by
00:46:04
Yum, Mei, and Vox.
00:46:05
>> Well, no, they don't own it. We own it
00:46:07
and they're our partner for the next
00:46:08
three years. I wish you would do that
00:46:09
correctly. People think they own it, but
00:46:11
they don't. We do.
00:46:12
>> Okay. We own We own it. Uh, and we can't
00:46:14
do anything with it for the next three
00:46:15
years. But anyways, the
00:46:16
>> That's okay.
00:46:17
>> Uh, those are the assets. podcasting at
00:46:20
Vox and I'll just talk about us uh is
00:46:24
growing, you know, 25 plus percent a
00:46:26
year, maybe 30% a year. And when they
00:46:29
and when they get scaled, they're
00:46:30
amazing businesses because quite
00:46:31
frankly, there's just not there's not a
00:46:33
lot of cost involved in these things.
00:46:36
And you're seeing and quite frankly, I
00:46:38
also think we're benefiting from Trump
00:46:40
to the extent that I think people are
00:46:41
really hungry for thoughtful,
00:46:44
I don't want to call it progressive, but
00:46:45
a thoughtful push back.
00:46:47
>> We But we also do good. You did Warner,
00:46:49
I did Tillis, we do all kinds of manner
00:46:51
of things.
00:46:52
>> Anyways, the the the crown jewel is is
00:46:55
the Vox Media podcast network. But the
00:46:57
the thing that makes the most sense
00:46:58
here, which is what Jim is doing, is
00:47:01
that when you have a conglomerate that
00:47:03
doesn't have really obvious synergies,
00:47:05
which quite frankly I would argue this
00:47:06
one doesn't. People, the market looks at
00:47:09
the shittiest asset in the portfolio,
00:47:10
which is these digital properties, and
00:47:12
it assigns that valuation to the entire
00:47:14
thing. So the disposition of assets is
00:47:16
accretive to shareholders and Jim has
00:47:19
figured that out and he's going to split
00:47:20
up the company and he's going to have a
00:47:21
very focused podcast company that tries
00:47:23
to industrialized podcasting and video I
00:47:26
would say because podcasts are video now
00:47:28
>> that's that's a great point because
00:47:29
effectively what you have is podcasts
00:47:32
are the new TV shows with a lower means
00:47:34
of cost of production but I would argue
00:47:37
if he sells he'll get an amazing assume
00:47:39
and I don't I again I see above I have
00:47:41
no insider information here he'll get an
00:47:43
amazing irrational price for New York
00:47:45
Mag. He could sell the digital stuff for
00:47:47
a dollar and just be a podcast company
00:47:49
growing 25% a year and it would be worth
00:47:52
more. So this it makes all sorts of
00:47:54
strategic sense. Comcast is probably
00:47:58
Comcast I think invested
00:48:00
>> Comcast did invest. Yes. And so did
00:48:02
>> Comcast was the initial investor.
00:48:04
>> Yes. But the investment went over to
00:48:05
Versent just so you know.
00:48:07
>> Well, okay. The Robert Robert's family
00:48:09
is ready to get some money back. They've
00:48:12
been in this thing for 10 years, 11
00:48:14
years. They've probably said, "Okay, we
00:48:16
want some money back. You need a
00:48:17
strategy here."
00:48:18
>> I think it's going to be very
00:48:19
interesting to see.
00:48:20
>> Yeah, we'll see. One of the things that
00:48:21
I think reporters have gotten wrong
00:48:22
about it, and I I'm not going to say
00:48:24
much more because I do know a lot is you
00:48:26
can't, one of them is like you can pick
00:48:28
off these podcasters what's it worth
00:48:29
because you can you actually can't once
00:48:31
you have a good and Scott and I went out
00:48:33
in the market and looked at lots of
00:48:34
people and there a lot of them were
00:48:35
great, but a lot of them don't have
00:48:38
stuff, right? And so this would be
00:48:39
attractive to people who it's really
00:48:41
hard to sell advertising well. It's
00:48:43
really hard to do distribution well.
00:48:45
It's very hard to do production well.
00:48:47
And Vox does that well. And there's a
00:48:49
couple of companies like that that do it
00:48:50
well too. There's Crooked I think does a
00:48:52
nice job. So it's valuable and it's not
00:48:55
as easy to replicate as you think. And
00:48:57
getting picked off is you sign four-year
00:48:59
deals everybody. And some of people have
00:49:01
guarantees. We don't happen to have that
00:49:03
but uh because we wanted more more
00:49:05
revenue to us. Um, but it's harder to do
00:49:08
than you think. And even if you're not
00:49:10
satisfied with the advertising sales or
00:49:13
whether you got big or not, it's there.
00:49:16
Box is one of the better ones, which is
00:49:18
why we stayed, right? And and and we
00:49:20
could certainly sell our own
00:49:22
advertising. It's just a slog and it's
00:49:24
hard. It's really hard to do it well.
00:49:26
And so it is an attractive asset and
00:49:29
there's a lot of people this could plug
00:49:30
into a lot and just use your
00:49:32
imagination. And also not just companies
00:49:35
but individuals who want platform who
00:49:37
want
00:49:37
>> CNBC needs to do something.
00:49:39
>> Exactly. That mean you know you're
00:49:42
seeing CNN trying to do podcasting with
00:49:44
Jake Tapper and Anderson.
00:49:45
>> CNBC is local news with with sleeveless
00:49:48
dresses and Andrew Ross Orin. I mean
00:49:50
plus
00:49:50
>> they're going to be your new friends.
00:49:51
>> By the way, why why does Joe Karen get
00:49:53
sleeves and none of the other people do?
00:49:55
Um anyways the
00:49:57
>> we do not want to see that. Mark
00:49:59
>> Brian Roberts and Comcast they are very
00:50:01
>> it's not Comcast. You have to say Vers.
00:50:04
No, it's not whatever. It's not the They
00:50:06
own only a certain portion of it as a
00:50:08
public company. It's similar. There's
00:50:10
others anyway. It would help Vers, which
00:50:12
also needs to be innovative. So, in that
00:50:14
regard, but there's lots of others.
00:50:16
>> MSNBC,
00:50:17
MS Now, I'm sorry, MS Now, MS Now and
00:50:21
CNBC need a growth strategy. They're
00:50:23
they are in businesses in structural
00:50:25
decline. The average age of M MS Now
00:50:28
viewer I think is 64. CNBC at 67. The
00:50:32
average age of a podcast listener is 34.
00:50:35
The average age of pivot listener is 42.
00:50:37
They need an audience that isn't is
00:50:39
going to be around for another 5 or 10
00:50:41
years that buys [ __ ] that is in the
00:50:43
midst of buying homes, having kids,
00:50:45
making investments, buying mutual funds.
00:50:47
And they're smart people. So they do I
00:50:50
mean CNBC does an amazing job. They have
00:50:52
some of the finest financial journalists
00:50:54
in the world. MS now has some of the
00:50:56
most talented people in the world. So,
00:50:58
but what they need is is they need a
00:51:00
structural growth engine. They need to
00:51:01
find platforms that are growing and are
00:51:03
attracting
00:51:04
>> audience. And they've been trying, but
00:51:06
they're they've definitely been trying
00:51:07
more than other.
00:51:07
>> You know who probably inspired this
00:51:09
whole idea?
00:51:10
>> Me. What? No.
00:51:11
>> Other than you is Nicole Wallace.
00:51:14
>> Yes. Because Nicole, who's got a very
00:51:17
popular show on MS Now, started a
00:51:19
podcast that immediately
00:51:21
>> went to the top of the I would bet
00:51:23
Nicole's podcast is probably doing seven
00:51:26
or 10 million a year in ad revenue,
00:51:27
which doesn't seem like a lot, but I bet
00:51:29
six or seven of that is go close to the
00:51:31
bottom line. So, you got to think the
00:51:34
folks at Versant, Comcast, Roberts, Joey
00:51:37
Bag of Donuts, HBO Now, whatever you
00:51:38
want to call it, it have said
00:51:40
>> they got to be looking, they've got to
00:51:41
be looking,
00:51:42
>> they need to be in this business. Look
00:51:44
at the charts. You and I are near the
00:51:45
top as in Pivot. Uh individually, both
00:51:48
of us are. All your market stuff are. Um
00:51:52
lots of lots of Vox podcasts are near
00:51:54
the top and over all the the network
00:51:56
ones. We're often we're always higher
00:51:59
than all of them. So anyway, it's
00:52:00
interesting. It's an interesting time.
00:52:01
We'll see what happens. And we're
00:52:02
nothing at all. Nothing at all might
00:52:04
happen. We'll see. Anyway, um uh it
00:52:07
makes sense to us though. Uh uh we'll go
00:52:10
on a quick break and when we come back
00:52:12
the White House launches an app.
00:52:15
>> Support for Pivot comes from Anthropic.
00:52:17
Some questions are easy, but other
00:52:18
questions are a lot more complicated
00:52:20
than a simple yes or no. And when you're
00:52:22
deep in the weeds trying to find an
00:52:23
answer to one of those problems, you
00:52:25
want a partner who works just as hard as
00:52:26
you do. And Claude from Anthropic was
00:52:29
designed to be that partner. Claude is
00:52:31
the AI for minds that don't stop at good
00:52:33
enough. It's a collaborator that
00:52:34
actually understands your entire
00:52:35
workflow and thinks with you. Whether
00:52:37
you're debugging code at midnight or
00:52:38
strategizing your next business move,
00:52:40
Cloud extends your thinking to tackle
00:52:42
the problems that matter. And with
00:52:43
Cloud, you can actually build
00:52:44
interactive tools and apps to help your
00:52:46
workflow. Just describe what you need
00:52:48
from custom calculators to data
00:52:50
visualization dashboards or even
00:52:52
prototypes. And Cloud can cover it all
00:52:54
without writing a single line of code.
00:52:56
Plus, Cloud's research capabilities go
00:52:58
deeper than basic web search. It can
00:52:59
have comprehensive, reliable analysis
00:53:01
with proper citations, turning hours of
00:53:03
research into minutes. Ready to tackle
00:53:05
bigger problems? Get started with Cloud
00:53:07
today at cloud.ai/pivot.
00:53:10
That's cloud.ai/pivot
00:53:12
and check out CloudPro, which includes
00:53:14
access to all of the features mentioned
00:53:16
in today's episode. cloud.ai/pivot.
00:53:22
Scott, we're back with more news. The
00:53:24
White House just launched an official
00:53:25
app for iPhone and Android featuring
00:53:27
press releases and affordability
00:53:28
tracker, and an ICE tip line. Of course,
00:53:31
the Trump administration says the app
00:53:32
offers a direct line to the White House,
00:53:34
letting people text the president sign
00:53:35
up for newsletters. But those features
00:53:37
just link to White House contacts forms
00:53:38
that are already there, letting the
00:53:40
administration access users personal
00:53:41
information and some additional privacy
00:53:43
concerns. People digging into the app,
00:53:45
it took 5 seconds, found that it's
00:53:47
tracking GPS location data every four
00:53:49
and a half minutes. It's a privacy
00:53:51
nightmare. Do not download it. Um, just
00:53:54
very briefly, then we'll get to Winston
00:53:56
Fails. I would rather give my ex-wife
00:53:59
access to my text message history than
00:54:02
sign up for I mean who is [ __ ] stupid
00:54:06
enough to do that?
00:54:07
>> I know it's not trustworthy. Don't sign
00:54:09
up for it.
00:54:10
>> You think?
00:54:10
>> No, but I mean I wouldn't mind that the
00:54:12
White House has an app. It's just this
00:54:14
one is a People were like, "Okay, a
00:54:17
company doing this, you'd call them
00:54:18
scummy. The government doing this to its
00:54:21
citizens." The same people that are
00:54:22
demanding voter roles
00:54:24
>> that are that are that are targeting
00:54:27
people that are hiring Palunteer to
00:54:29
surveil people and you want to sign up
00:54:31
for their app
00:54:32
>> don't and it's really sad because the
00:54:33
White House should have direct
00:54:34
communication with people but to help
00:54:36
people not to take advantage of their
00:54:38
[ __ ] information. These people like
00:54:40
literally but someone who does apps is
00:54:42
like I I would think this is scummy for
00:54:45
a scummy person, right? Not our federal
00:54:47
friaking government. Very typical of the
00:54:49
Trump administration. Do not get it. do
00:54:51
not get it. And also an ice tip line.
00:54:54
What kind of person are you that you tip
00:54:55
on people? Gh,
00:54:57
>> as my grand my grandfather was, you
00:54:58
know, a mob mob adjacent, I would say.
00:55:02
Not really in the mob. Um, but like I
00:55:05
hate a a rat. A rat a rat. Like, you
00:55:09
know, it's fine to say see something,
00:55:10
say something. You see a bag in an
00:55:12
airport, yes, report it. But reporting
00:55:14
on your fellow citizens is if they're
00:55:16
not criminals, if they're not criminals,
00:55:18
[ __ ] you for doing that. You terrible
00:55:20
people. Anyway,
00:55:21
>> yeah,
00:55:22
>> one more quick break. We'll be back for
00:55:24
wins and fails. Okay, Scott, let's hear
00:55:27
some wins and fails. I think I shall
00:55:29
start.
00:55:30
>> You go.
00:55:31
>> Um, I, you know, I really, I have to say
00:55:34
I really like Slope. I didn't think I'd
00:55:37
say that, but I do. I'm a Manhattan
00:55:38
girl, but I really enjoy uh being there
00:55:41
and uh spending time there. I like going
00:55:43
to different places and but I mostly
00:55:45
want to say the win is Scott Gallery for
00:55:46
being such a good landlord to me when I
00:55:48
was in New York.
00:55:48
>> That's nice. Thank you. He's been
00:55:50
generous and I love his apartment. It's
00:55:52
wonderful. I I love being in like a lot
00:55:54
I feel really good about cities and I
00:55:56
feel like New York feels great.
00:55:58
Washington does feel great. I'm going to
00:56:00
San Francisco soon. I just I'm very uh
00:56:03
I'm very up on cities these days and
00:56:05
like kind of the creativity that you see
00:56:07
everywhere um in in them and just kind
00:56:10
of just a I just love a melting pot of
00:56:12
people. I really do. Um so I really I
00:56:14
I'm I'm winds are cities again. melting
00:56:17
poted $3,000 a square foot.
00:56:20
>> Yeah. Who's melting?
00:56:21
>> No way. But I'm just saying I went all
00:56:23
over. I went all over the city and and
00:56:26
it just was I just love a city. I just
00:56:27
love a city.
00:56:28
>> I so could have predicted you to end up
00:56:29
in Brooklyn.
00:56:30
>> I No, I would have done
00:56:33
>> I would have done the West Village, but
00:56:35
Amanda really likes that area and she's
00:56:38
friends there. And I get it. And I get
00:56:39
it. I get it. I get it. Anyway, um
00:56:43
>> Oh god, you're going to have
00:56:43
Birkenstocks.
00:56:44
>> No, I'm not. I never wear Birkenstocks.
00:56:46
This is never happening. No, I wear
00:56:48
Vans. Let's be clear. All right. And my
00:56:50
fail is um Oh, God, there's so many. But
00:56:52
I think the worst one is
00:56:54
>> I mean, I was going between Melania
00:56:56
Trump's robot for teaching children,
00:56:58
which I'm like, worst idea ever. I'm
00:57:01
sorry. Like, I don't mind robots folding
00:57:02
laundry, and I'm sure we'll have them,
00:57:04
and I don't mind them delivering things.
00:57:06
Fine, whatever. But teaching children
00:57:09
should be done by people with help from
00:57:11
technology. That is fine. But this
00:57:13
personalized educators for American
00:57:15
children and her walking out there. I
00:57:16
couldn't tell which was the robot and
00:57:17
which was Melania, which is a typical
00:57:20
joke, but honestly, what an idiot. I
00:57:22
She's really What an amoronic thing to
00:57:25
to feature at the White House is a
00:57:27
featured stage and to stage the idea and
00:57:30
insulting teachers. I I my my kid just
00:57:33
got in, my little kid got into the same
00:57:35
public school Claire is in for next
00:57:37
year. And I went walked by the teacher
00:57:39
and I said, "Alex, I mean Saul got in um
00:57:43
to the class and she was like, "Yay,
00:57:45
go." And I just love I just I love the
00:57:47
teachers. They really are dedicated and
00:57:48
committed, the ones we have dealt with,
00:57:50
especially in public schools, but all
00:57:52
the schools that the kids have been to.
00:57:53
Um and so I just hated that that thing.
00:57:55
And the second one was Trump signing the
00:57:57
US currency. It was always been a
00:57:59
Treasury Secretary person. Just another
00:58:02
grotesque like look at me, mommy didn't
00:58:05
hug me moment. So just gross. Just just
00:58:09
like I can't wait till we get rid of all
00:58:11
this stuff off all all the gold in the
00:58:13
office which has gotten out of control
00:58:15
and the whole thing. I can't wait we
00:58:16
tear it all down. Every bit of it. So
00:58:19
including getting his signature off the
00:58:20
dollar when when he puts it on. Anyway,
00:58:22
Scott,
00:58:24
>> I like those. Uh so my win is and you
00:58:27
mentioned this. I watched Louis
00:58:28
Thorough's documentary The Manosphere
00:58:30
and I I really I it was very
00:58:32
illuminating for me. Um, and a few of
00:58:35
the takeaways,
00:58:37
uh, first off, these quoteunquote,
00:58:40
you know, icons of the manosphere, these
00:58:42
podcasters or the folks portrayed,
00:58:45
>> they're grifters and they don't even buy
00:58:48
the things that they don't even buy into
00:58:50
the ideology. There's always a crypto
00:58:52
scam or a trading platform.
00:58:55
>> Yeah.
00:58:56
>> Or or, you know, buy their course or
00:58:59
whatever it is. Um, and they themselves,
00:59:03
this is not about ideology for them.
00:59:05
This is just this is just purely a
00:59:07
grift. And
00:59:09
>> and I think a decent
00:59:10
>> they're selling ideology as a product.
00:59:12
>> Well, and they're also trying to sell
00:59:14
masculinity and what I would argue is a
00:59:16
decent proxy for or a decent query for
00:59:19
masculinity is simple and ask yourself a
00:59:21
question. Are you optimizing for
00:59:23
attention or for service? And these guys
00:59:26
are optimizing for attention. Full stop.
00:59:28
And the other takeaway is I thought that
00:59:32
uh Louie really did a good job of
00:59:34
exemplifying that
00:59:37
um strength is more about he's this
00:59:40
slight guy who's a bit awkward and he
00:59:44
owns the room when he's in it.
00:59:45
>> He does
00:59:46
>> because he's quiet. He asks hard
00:59:49
questions.
00:59:50
>> He's not mean. And the other thing, the
00:59:53
takeaway I think for younger men
00:59:55
watching that is it's okay to
00:59:57
occasionally absorb a blow. And that,
00:59:59
and I didn't learn this until I was
01:00:01
older, I thought if someone was rude to
01:00:02
me or coming off in traffic, I had to
01:00:04
restore equilibri equilibrium to the
01:00:05
universe and get back in their face. And
01:00:07
at one point in the documentary, his
01:00:10
subjects were making fun of him, mocking
01:00:11
him, and he just takes it. It's like, I
01:00:14
got a job to do. The other thing that
01:00:15
kind of rattled me was,
01:00:18
and I think this is true of the
01:00:19
manosphere, and it's a lesson for the
01:00:21
left, I don't think I think a lot of the
01:00:24
young men who are quoteunquote in the
01:00:26
manosphere or drawn to these these these
01:00:30
men or these I don't know what you would
01:00:31
call them grifters.
01:00:35
It's not that they necessarily buy into
01:00:37
this [ __ ]
01:00:39
um ideology of dominating women or I
01:00:42
mean actually some of these some of the
01:00:43
stuff it actually starts off fine. Be
01:00:45
fit, take control, be aggressive,
01:00:48
initiate your life, manifest success and
01:00:51
then it comes off the [ __ ] rails and
01:00:52
it's usually about just dominating women
01:00:54
and being a total misogynist.
01:00:56
>> But what you found, I thought what was
01:00:58
most interesting is when they
01:00:59
interviewed some of the acolytes, the
01:01:00
people who are really drawn to these
01:01:02
people.
01:01:03
>> Inspiration. It's really upsetting
01:01:06
because what these kids, what these
01:01:08
boys, and they aren't boys, what they're
01:01:09
looking for,
01:01:10
>> Yeah.
01:01:11
>> they're not, it's not that they're drawn
01:01:13
to this ideology or this political
01:01:15
viewpoint. It's not even they're drawn,
01:01:16
I I don't think, to the misogyny.
01:01:19
>> They're drawn and they're so desperate
01:01:22
for community.
01:01:23
>> They are.
01:01:23
>> They want a reason to hang out with and
01:01:26
have a common bond
01:01:28
>> among other young men.
01:01:29
>> Yeah. They want to get better. They want
01:01:31
to feel better about themselves. They
01:01:32
want to improve This is where the left
01:01:34
has failed.
01:01:35
>> Mhm. I agree.
01:01:36
>> What orthodoxy or ideology on the left
01:01:38
creates a community for young men.
01:01:41
>> Yeah. What is it?
01:01:41
>> You you said that early on when
01:01:43
commisers didn't have stuff on her thing
01:01:45
about men. I don't think they
01:01:46
>> tell young men they're the problem.
01:01:47
That's not a community to rally around.
01:01:49
>> And pointed that out. And I think I
01:01:51
think what we have to do is like feel
01:01:53
like we're in it. Like I I the questions
01:01:56
I got, you know, I have expert
01:01:57
questions. One was for the guy who did
01:01:58
adolescence, Jack. And then I had
01:02:00
Gretchen Whitmer ask a question which
01:02:02
who's been doing a lot of man boy stuff
01:02:04
in in the state because she understands
01:02:07
it and so you're right. You're 100%
01:02:10
right. Okay.
01:02:10
>> Anyways, my win I thought Louis Thorough
01:02:12
documentary the manifest I found it so
01:02:14
rattling. I thought these young men just
01:02:17
so sad. One one of the young men he was
01:02:19
talking about his brother took his own
01:02:20
life. You could tell these young men are
01:02:22
just so desperate to find community and
01:02:25
a sense of safety and and other people
01:02:27
who it's not even the ideology they're
01:02:30
bonding over. They're just bonding.
01:02:32
Anyways, uh that's my win. My fail is
01:02:35
that I can I believe that the Democrats
01:02:38
continue to show a lack of creativity
01:02:39
and leadership around a series of
01:02:41
incentives of what they are going to do
01:02:43
and spell it out very specifically what
01:02:46
they are going to do when they get
01:02:46
control of the House and potentially the
01:02:48
Senate. And it should be something along
01:02:49
the lines of the following. Everyone is
01:02:52
saying, "Oh, we can't go after these
01:02:54
individuals despite their crimes because
01:02:55
they're just going to get a pardon."
01:02:57
[ __ ]
01:02:58
If you look at the law, once once
01:03:02
Democrats control of Congress and
01:03:04
Senate, they have subpoena power. Once
01:03:06
they get subpoena power, they should go
01:03:08
after specific individuals for crimes.
01:03:10
And then they should coordinate, and
01:03:11
this is the key, with the attorney
01:03:13
generals in blue states and start going
01:03:16
after these individuals who are no
01:03:17
longer protected by federal pardons. So,
01:03:21
for example, the attorney general in
01:03:22
California might decide that if a trade
01:03:25
on crypto went through and that family
01:03:28
members of the Trump administration were
01:03:30
illegally manipulating markets or
01:03:32
engaging in any sort of insider trading
01:03:35
that California AG can coordinate with
01:03:37
Democratic representatives to bring a
01:03:39
case against them and that case is not
01:03:41
subject to the protections of a federal
01:03:43
pardon. They need to sooner rather than
01:03:45
later put these people on notice that if
01:03:48
you are murdering people uh under the
01:03:51
oposes of a secret police, if you are
01:03:53
lying under oath, if you are engaged in
01:03:55
crypto scams, if you have companies that
01:03:57
overnight get contracts from the
01:03:58
military violating the imalments clause,
01:04:01
be clear,
01:04:02
>> it's crazy. and a a a candidate for
01:04:05
president or a senator or Democratic
01:04:07
representatives should outline specific
01:04:09
cases they are going to bring against
01:04:12
specific individuals in coordination
01:04:14
with specific AGS in specific states
01:04:17
that are not protected by a presidential
01:04:20
pardon.
01:04:21
>> Yeah.
01:04:21
>> And and who's done that?
01:04:24
>> Mhm.
01:04:24
>> [ __ ] nobody.
01:04:26
>> Some of these attorney generals are
01:04:27
working at it. Scott, I think that's not
01:04:28
fair. I think they are preparing them.
01:04:30
>> We got close
01:04:31
>> Yeah.
01:04:31
>> with what was her name? Fanny Hill.
01:04:33
Fanny
01:04:34
>> in Georgia, the Fulton County.
01:04:36
>> Yep.
01:04:36
>> But unfortunately, she like Chrissy
01:04:38
Gnome was [ __ ] her number two, which
01:04:40
blew that case apart.
01:04:42
>> Yes, that did.
01:04:43
>> But there is real opportunity here.
01:04:45
>> There is. I think there's more. I'm
01:04:47
being contacted by a lot of I think
01:04:48
attorney generals are really starting to
01:04:50
coordinate quite a bit on around these
01:04:51
things. And one of the things that's
01:04:53
critical for all of you people waiting
01:04:54
for a Trump pardon. Remember, he's not
01:04:56
going to give it to you till the very
01:04:57
end because he's loyal only to himself.
01:04:59
And he's going to extract something from
01:05:00
you. And that might be too late. So
01:05:03
>> I'm saying take that off the table.
01:05:04
>> Yeah. No, I know. But I'm just saying it
01:05:06
just I think a lot of people are gonna
01:05:08
get
01:05:08
>> if the AG in Minnesota is saying you
01:05:10
committed manslaughter and you lied
01:05:12
under oath and as a result we have an
01:05:14
ICU nurse who was who is buried.
01:05:18
We can come after you. Presidential
01:05:20
pardon or not. And these are the people
01:05:22
we're coming for. And these are the
01:05:24
subpoenas we're issuing when we're in
01:05:25
control of Congress and the Senate.
01:05:26
Okay. Anyways, that's my that's my fail
01:05:28
is I think the Democrats need to start
01:05:30
punching back more creatively and more
01:05:32
aggressively.
01:05:33
>> I like it. I like it a lot. Okay, we
01:05:35
want to hear from you. Send us your
01:05:37
questions about business, tech, or
01:05:38
whatever is on your mind. Go to
01:05:39
nymag.com/pivot to submit a question for
01:05:41
the show or call 8551 pivot. Elsewhere
01:05:43
in the Karen Scott universe from the
01:05:45
latest episode of On with Cara Swisser,
01:05:47
I spoke with North Carolina Republican
01:05:49
Senator Tom Tillis. We talked about his
01:05:51
upcoming retirement and how he can more
01:05:52
freely criticize the Trump
01:05:53
administration right now. Let's listen
01:05:55
to a clip. I have expressed my concern
01:05:58
in the past. I no longer have to worry
01:06:01
about what language I use to communicate
01:06:04
it because I don't have to go through
01:06:05
the cost.
01:06:06
>> You can be clearer than some of your
01:06:08
colleagues because I have to tell you
01:06:09
when I talk to some of your colleagues
01:06:10
off the record, the Republicans, they're
01:06:12
much more critical of Trump or
01:06:13
>> of course. But look, I mean, you know
01:06:15
what all martyrs have in common? What?
01:06:17
>> They're dead. And in politics, that's
01:06:19
losing elections.
01:06:21
>> Very smart guy. Very interesting guy.
01:06:23
But some people call him too late. Tell
01:06:25
us that he's done he always thought this
01:06:27
and didn't say it. Other people think,
01:06:28
well, good for him. And he is actually
01:06:30
holding up uh the the the Fed chair
01:06:33
thing because of the [ __ ] uh thing
01:06:35
and he's holding up a lot of stuff. He
01:06:37
helped get Christy Gnome out of there.
01:06:39
So I'm you know whatever. My friend Neil
01:06:41
Brennan, he was he said something very
01:06:44
>> cogent and he said despite the
01:06:45
temptation to say you idiots, we told
01:06:47
you so or whatever,
01:06:49
>> we need to be really good at welcoming
01:06:51
anybody, right? And praising anybody.
01:06:53
>> Yeah,
01:06:54
>> I agree. I agree. I think he's been he's
01:06:56
going to be very effective through
01:06:57
January of getting stuff cuz he's he's
01:07:00
he's a very complex politician who's
01:07:02
very behind uh gay marriage and stuff
01:07:04
like it's he's a complex conservative
01:07:06
and that's what we should.
01:07:07
>> When you say behind gay marriage, you
01:07:08
mean against it? No, for he helped pass
01:07:11
it when he was in North Carolina or
01:07:12
something of protections. He's he's much
01:07:14
more um complex as a as a politician and
01:07:17
we should allow our conservative and
01:07:19
liberal politicians to be complex and
01:07:22
maybe not fully be on board with the
01:07:24
purity test on either side. Agreed.
01:07:26
>> Okay, that's the show. Thanks for
01:07:27
listening to Pivot and be sure to like
01:07:28
and subscribe to our YouTube channel.
01:07:30
We'll be back on Friday.

Episode Highlights

  • Moving to Brooklyn
    Cara shares her experience of moving into a new apartment in Brooklyn.
    “I miss you but I have to move on from our housing relationship.”
    @ 00m 45s
    March 31, 2026
  • Protests and Change
    A discussion on the recent protests and the growing desire for action among people.
    “People are tired and they want to do something. And it’s not hopeless.”
    @ 09m 01s
    March 31, 2026
  • Elon Musk's Trillionaire Potential
    Musk could become the first recorded trillionaire in history with a 71% chance this year.
    “This IPO could make him the first recorded trillionaire in history.”
    @ 21m 46s
    March 31, 2026
  • Anthropic's Legal Victory
    A federal judge blocked the Pentagon's efforts to label Anthropic a supply chain risk, calling it illegal retaliation.
    “This is a classic illegal first amendment retaliation.”
    @ 32m 39s
    March 31, 2026
  • Anthropic's Stand on AI Ethics
    Anthropic is reportedly the only major AI company publicly opposing autonomous weapons and mass surveillance.
    “Anthropic is really the only major AI company that has drawn a public line.”
    @ 36m 49s
    March 31, 2026
  • Nextar and Tegna Merger Blocked
    A judge has temporarily blocked a $6 billion merger between Nextar and Tegna, citing antitrust violations.
    “The merger violates federal antitrust laws.”
    @ 40m 44s
    March 31, 2026
  • White House App Launch
    The White House launched an app that raises serious privacy concerns.
    “It's a privacy nightmare. Do not download it.”
    @ 53m 47s
    March 31, 2026
  • Community Desperation Among Young Men
    Discussion on the lack of community for young men and their search for belonging.
    “These young men are just so desperate to find community.”
    @ 01h 02m 25s
    March 31, 2026
  • Martyrs in Politics
    A stark reminder of the risks in politics: 'What all martyrs have in common? They're dead.'
    “What all martyrs have in common? They're dead.”
    @ 01h 06m 15s
    March 31, 2026
  • The Complexity of Politicians
    Politicians can be complex, holding views that don't fit traditional molds. 'He's a complex conservative.'
    “He's a complex conservative.”
    @ 01h 07m 06s
    March 31, 2026

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Moving Day00:45
  • IKEA Love01:55
  • Protest Energy09:01
  • Musk's Chaos17:35
  • Local News Importance40:06
  • Judicial Ruling40:44
  • Privacy Nightmare53:47
  • Martyrs in Politics1:06:15

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Podcast thumbnail
Trump Says U.S. Is “In Charge” of Venezuela — But What Happens Next? | Pivot
Podcast thumbnail
How Kara Swisher "Cracked the Case"… and Got Dragged Into the Nuzzi-Lizza-RFK Jr drama | Pivot
Podcast thumbnail
Scott Galloway and Kara Swisher Agree to Disagree on Zohran Mamdani's Policies | Pivot
Podcast thumbnail
“Manufactured Division”: How Social Media Is Driving Anger and Polarization | Pivot