Search Captions & Ask AI

Defense Companies Face a "Transformer" Challenge Under Leaner Budgets

December 07, 2012 / 16:18

This episode features Dave Meltchure, CEO of ITT Excelis, discussing the company's focus on defense and aerospace, revenue sources, and industry changes.

Meltchure explains that 70% of Excelis' revenues come from defense-related businesses, with efforts to diversify into commercial sectors like aviation and international markets. He highlights the importance of adapting to shifts in military technology and budget priorities.

The conversation covers the challenges of the defense industry, especially with potential downturns, and how Excelis is preparing for these changes. Meltchure emphasizes the need for affordable capabilities and the company's strategy to remain agile.

He also discusses Excelis' involvement in NASA's deep space network and the Mars Curiosity project, showcasing the company's technological capabilities and their application beyond defense.

Meltchure concludes with insights on future opportunities in commercial markets, including imaging technology and power solutions for military and first responders.

TL;DR

Dave Meltchure discusses ITT Excelis' defense focus, industry challenges, and future opportunities in commercial markets.

Episode

16:18
00:00:01
[Music]
00:00:08
[Music]
00:00:20
We're speaking today with Dave
00:00:22
Meltchure, CEO of ITT Excelis, which
00:00:25
spun off from ITT exactly a year ago.
00:00:28
About 70% of Excel's revenues come from
00:00:31
defense related businesses. And so uh in
00:00:34
this world today with sequestration and
00:00:36
other issues coming to the four um
00:00:39
everyone's wondering what defense
00:00:42
companies are going to do uh in the in
00:00:44
the new world. Could you tell us a
00:00:45
little bit about your company and and
00:00:48
the industry in general?
00:00:50
We are a defense and aerospace company
00:00:52
uh but we also do networking. Uh and one
00:00:54
of the things we've tried to do over the
00:00:56
past uh several years is to diversify a
00:00:59
bit away from sole dependence upon the
00:01:01
Department of Defense. Uh and so as you
00:01:03
mentioned we're 70% DoD today and we're
00:01:05
30% other and that other constitutes uh
00:01:08
organizations like the Federal Aviation
00:01:10
Administration, NASA International is
00:01:13
now about 10% of our revenues and
00:01:15
commercial is about 3 or 4%. Uh and so
00:01:18
we're trying to grow in those latter two
00:01:20
arenas certainly and we're trying to
00:01:21
find some other business uh be it
00:01:23
governmental or you know otherwise that
00:01:26
allows us to use our technologies in a
00:01:28
different way than just solely
00:01:29
supporting the department but DoD is
00:01:31
still very important to us uh you know
00:01:32
don't don't mistake that. Uh and so
00:01:35
we've tried to you know adapt to thrust
00:01:37
on for the Pacific uh different
00:01:39
priorities and focus areas that'll be
00:01:42
needed for the future.
00:01:43
The military's gone so high-tech in
00:01:47
recent years and um a lot of the
00:01:49
discussion around the defense budget has
00:01:52
been doing away with some of the bigger
00:01:53
platforms which are seen as not as
00:01:55
important whereas some of the more
00:01:57
electronic capabilities are increasingly
00:01:59
important. Could you discuss um how that
00:02:02
shift is happening and um how your
00:02:04
company's positioned for that? Well, I
00:02:06
think we're very well positioned for
00:02:08
being platform agnostic, you know, is is
00:02:10
probably the way to term it. um we build
00:02:13
the capabilities that either go on
00:02:14
platforms whether they're new ones like
00:02:16
the F-35 or uh if the decision is made
00:02:19
to upgrade F-18s, F-16s, you know, we
00:02:22
build a lot of capability that goes on
00:02:24
those platforms as well. So, you know,
00:02:26
we we don't rise or fall on any one ship
00:02:29
or plane or ground combat vehicle. Uh in
00:02:32
terms of priorities, electronic warfare
00:02:34
uh has been a stated priority for the
00:02:36
future. uh networking is a stated
00:02:38
priority and of course we have deep
00:02:40
capabilities in both of those areas. Uh
00:02:42
and then sensors to decisions you know
00:02:44
everyone says we have so many sensors
00:02:46
today unmanned aerial vehicles you know
00:02:49
airborne sensors shipboard sensors how
00:02:51
do you make sense of all the data that's
00:02:53
coming in through all these multiple
00:02:54
venues we have a lot of capability there
00:02:57
in integrating big data and you know
00:02:58
making it more accessible to the users
00:03:01
uh you know of of every service. People
00:03:04
talk about big industries like defense.
00:03:06
If you try to make changes, it's like
00:03:08
turning the Queen Mary or perhaps a big
00:03:10
battleship is a better metaphor. The
00:03:12
whole industry has to shift as the
00:03:14
Pentagon's priorities are shifting. Um,
00:03:17
how difficult is that going to be for
00:03:19
the industry? How much is it going to
00:03:20
change? How different will it look 5
00:03:22
years from now? Well, I think it is
00:03:24
going to be a wrenching process uh for
00:03:26
defense and aerospace companies,
00:03:27
particularly those that are more pure
00:03:29
play uh aerospace and defense companies.
00:03:31
uh because the fact is we've been on a
00:03:33
you know a growth pattern for the last
00:03:35
10 years and these things tend to go in
00:03:38
10ear cycles 10 years up 10 years down
00:03:41
uh so I think everybody in industry is
00:03:43
trying to brace uh for the proposition
00:03:45
that this could be an 8 to 10 year down
00:03:47
cycle so I think getting cost structures
00:03:50
uh you know aortioned correctly to the
00:03:51
amount of revenues flowing through the
00:03:53
businesses re-examining footprint you
00:03:55
know looking for ways to you know be
00:03:57
more uh economical in delivering those
00:03:59
capabilities and services will be
00:04:01
extremely important. Affordable
00:04:03
capabilities is something that all of
00:04:05
our customers are going to need on the
00:04:06
DoD side. Were these big tectonic
00:04:09
changes in the defense industry um a big
00:04:11
part of the decision for the spin-off of
00:04:14
uh your company from ITT? Well, I think
00:04:16
the the underlying thesis for ITT
00:04:18
Corporation was that the sum of the
00:04:20
parts, a big defense company, a big
00:04:22
water products company, and a big
00:04:24
industrial products company were not
00:04:26
being valued, um, you know,
00:04:28
proportionate to their their underlying
00:04:30
worth. Uh, and so the theory was that if
00:04:32
the company split up, uh, then defense
00:04:35
and water and industrial products could
00:04:37
be valued more in line with the
00:04:38
multiples, uh, that were acrewing to
00:04:40
each of those industries. I think the
00:04:42
company felt it was a little overweight
00:04:44
in defense on the eve of a defense
00:04:45
downturn. Uh so you know since we uh
00:04:48
have broken up I think that theory has
00:04:50
basically held true. Each one of the
00:04:52
companies has performed fairly well
00:04:54
realizing that the economy is still not
00:04:56
you know entirely there for the
00:04:57
commercial side of the business and we
00:04:59
know we're facing a defense downturn.
00:05:01
But you know for our uh stock for
00:05:02
example we came on the market at 1033
00:05:04
and as of yesterday we were at 1099. So
00:05:07
there's been return to shareholders in
00:05:09
that year and we've paid about a 4%
00:05:11
dividend on top of that. So you know we
00:05:13
feel like we've performed in line with
00:05:15
expectations and the other two have as
00:05:17
well. Uh but that was the theory of the
00:05:18
case when you um were preparing for the
00:05:22
spin-off. Uh what were the biggest
00:05:25
challenges that you saw and how did that
00:05:27
comport with reality and also what were
00:05:29
some of the biggest surprises over the
00:05:31
first year uh from the spin-off that
00:05:33
that you found? Well, you know, the
00:05:35
preparation for a spin-off is uh
00:05:37
meticulous. Takes about 9 to 12 months
00:05:40
depending on on how hard you're going to
00:05:41
charge. You got to get all the SEC
00:05:43
approvals. You certainly have to get the
00:05:45
IRS approvals. You have to determine how
00:05:48
to split up all the assets, if you will,
00:05:50
of the company and the liabilities of
00:05:52
the company. Uh you have to have uh
00:05:54
transaction service agreements for IT
00:05:57
and for contracting and for shared
00:05:59
services. And so we had a very
00:06:01
disciplined process to work our way
00:06:03
through that over the nine or 10 months
00:06:05
uh prior to the spin-off. Then once we
00:06:07
had spun off, of course we had to build
00:06:08
a corporate team and we worked on that
00:06:10
prior to the spin-off. We went from a
00:06:12
about a 60 person uh group headquarters
00:06:15
inside of a larger corporation to about
00:06:17
a 125 person corporate team adding tax
00:06:21
and audit and uh treasury capabilities
00:06:24
that were you know formerly part of our
00:06:26
parent. Uh and so we we tried to bring
00:06:28
in a good diverse group of people with
00:06:30
different backgrounds and experiences
00:06:32
including commercial experience to try
00:06:34
and help us build a team that could be
00:06:36
ready for the you know for the
00:06:37
challenges that await it. For me
00:06:39
personally as a CEO um the time
00:06:41
allocations are very different. Um
00:06:43
dealing with a board probably takes 25
00:06:46
to 30% of your time. Uh whereas you were
00:06:48
not doing that previously. uh dealing
00:06:51
with the external community, the
00:06:52
analysts community, your investor
00:06:54
community. Those are all new parts of
00:06:56
the picture for a CEO of a spin-off
00:06:59
company. And then not the least of which
00:07:00
is managing the business uh now with no
00:07:03
reliance on other parts of the company,
00:07:05
you know. So if it's a tough defense
00:07:07
year, perhaps the commercial business is
00:07:09
doing well. If it's a good a tough
00:07:11
commercial year, perhaps the defense is
00:07:12
doing well. Now we're pretty much, you
00:07:14
know, left as a defense and aerospace
00:07:16
company uh that has to, you know, fend
00:07:17
for itself in this marketplace. But I
00:07:20
think, you know, we're trying to do that
00:07:21
very well and manage the challenges uh
00:07:23
that are out there. Um let's talk a
00:07:25
little bit more about that funding for
00:07:27
yourself. What's your what's your
00:07:28
overarching strategy over the next two
00:07:31
to four years, let's say? Well, we
00:07:33
intend to be, you know, a very agile
00:07:35
defense, aerospace, and networking
00:07:37
company that can bring not only high
00:07:39
technology solutions, but affordable
00:07:41
solutions to our customers. And I'm
00:07:43
talking customers in the Department of
00:07:44
Defense, in the other federal agencies,
00:07:47
internationally, and commercial
00:07:48
customers. And so we have a very wide
00:07:51
portfolio as you as you've observed in
00:07:53
looking at uh what we do lot of core
00:07:56
electronics air traffic management we
00:07:58
have air structure composits business
00:08:00
and we have a lot of sensors to
00:08:02
decisions capability including cyber
00:08:05
related capabilities. So what we're
00:08:07
trying to do is focus our investments
00:08:08
wisely on those things that represent
00:08:10
the greatest opportunity for us uh and
00:08:13
managing this portfolio in a in a smart
00:08:15
way to take advantage of the growth
00:08:17
platforms that we have even in a defense
00:08:19
downturn. defense related companies um
00:08:22
and the Pentagon are probably the
00:08:24
biggest targets of attack of cyber
00:08:27
warfare and um you therefore would have
00:08:31
to have a lot of experience in
00:08:32
protecting your systems and anti-cyber
00:08:34
warfare and all the rest of it. Uh are
00:08:37
you now or or will you be using that
00:08:39
capability to advise other firms on how
00:08:41
to secure their own networks? Uh we do
00:08:43
in fact have a a very extensive uh you
00:08:45
know cyber protection capability. We
00:08:47
defend our own networks. Uh and like
00:08:50
every other defense company and many
00:08:51
commercial companies out there, you
00:08:53
know, there have been a lot of attempts
00:08:54
to try and extract information from
00:08:56
those networks. We think we're very good
00:08:58
at doing that. And the reason we have to
00:08:59
be good is because we manage the FAA's
00:09:02
air transportation network. We manage
00:09:04
NASA's deep space network and the
00:09:06
Curiosity Mars rover um you know effort
00:09:09
is part of the network that that we
00:09:11
manage. We have to have those networks
00:09:13
secure as well. So it's not just about
00:09:15
securing our own network. It's about
00:09:16
securing the networks of our customers.
00:09:18
And so we do think that there's wide
00:09:20
applicability for those capabilities
00:09:21
that we have. Uh we are advising a lot
00:09:24
of federal customers with respect to
00:09:26
that. Not so much other commercial
00:09:28
companies. Uh we're not necessarily you
00:09:30
know in the business of doing you know
00:09:31
what what many companies do for
00:09:33
commercial businesses. Tell us about the
00:09:35
Mars Curiosity project. uh what your
00:09:38
company does and uh any special
00:09:40
challenges given that's probably the the
00:09:42
furthest piece of equipment away from
00:09:44
you that you've ever had to work with.
00:09:46
Well, we manage NASA's deep space
00:09:47
network which is a a series of three
00:09:49
gigantic uh antennas uh in the Mojave
00:09:53
Desert in Spain and Australia to try and
00:09:55
communicate with all those things. uh
00:09:58
you know the Voyager which is way out
00:09:59
there now you know at the outer limits
00:10:01
of the galaxy the Mars rover um you know
00:10:04
you have to have a means of
00:10:05
communicating with that capability so
00:10:07
that it can do the experiments and send
00:10:09
back the information uh we're very proud
00:10:11
to have been uh managing that contract
00:10:13
for NASA for the last several years and
00:10:15
so we were out in Pasadena at the Joint
00:10:17
Propulsion Lab uh the evening when the
00:10:19
Mars rover landed and our communications
00:10:22
folks were side by side with the NASA
00:10:24
people trying to ensure that everything
00:10:26
went according to plan and the series of
00:10:28
miracles that had to happen for that
00:10:30
thing to land uh cap you know on Mars
00:10:32
and we were a part of that and we're
00:10:34
very proud uh to have made a
00:10:35
contribution to this great effort.
00:10:38
Um could you talk a little bit about the
00:10:41
specific opportunities you see for
00:10:44
taking your technology which is as we
00:10:47
say mostly defense related and applying
00:10:48
it to non-defense businesses or niches.
00:10:52
Mhm. Well, as I said, our commercial
00:10:54
business is now today about 3 or 4% of
00:10:57
revenues, but I think we have the
00:10:58
potential to expand that going forward.
00:11:00
And here are a couple examples. Uh,
00:11:02
aerosure composits. We make these parts
00:11:05
for the F-35 and for the Sakorski
00:11:08
helicopters that are part of the marine
00:11:09
inventory, but we've also done
00:11:11
commercial parts for Boeing, and we're
00:11:13
looking to expand that with Airbus
00:11:15
Boeing and other commercial carriers uh
00:11:18
because we have a great facility out in
00:11:19
Salt Lake and can expand it. The
00:11:21
machines don't care whether it's a
00:11:22
commercial or a defense part. And so
00:11:24
there's one opportunity. Space payloads.
00:11:26
Uh we've built these for the government
00:11:28
and very high-end capabilities, but
00:11:30
we've sold a weather payload to Japan
00:11:33
and we're trying to sell imagery
00:11:34
payloads uh in places like the United
00:11:36
Arab Emirates. Uh and then we also have
00:11:39
some some defense technologies that have
00:11:41
a commercial application. For example,
00:11:43
one is uh a brain cancer treatment
00:11:46
called Novacure. Um it was an Israeli
00:11:49
technology. It's been through FDA
00:11:50
trials, but it centers around the
00:11:52
pasoelectric discs that are part of a
00:11:54
harness that helps to prevent brain
00:11:57
glyopblastoma and then lung also. Uh,
00:12:00
and so it's because they they emanate a
00:12:03
perfect uh electric current that was
00:12:05
developed for DoD purposes on largecale
00:12:07
sonar arrays but now applied to a
00:12:10
medical technology. We also have a
00:12:12
commercial uh imagery business uh you
00:12:14
know and tools to take commercial
00:12:16
imagery geollocate it and make it
00:12:18
accessible to businesses that use that
00:12:20
kind of information. So I think we
00:12:22
really have a number of opportunities in
00:12:24
the commercial um you know market that
00:12:26
are close to our core capabilities in
00:12:28
defense uh and that can be explo
00:12:31
exploited as we go forward for the lay
00:12:33
person. Would you explain in a little
00:12:34
more detail what imaging means in in the
00:12:37
way that you're using it? Uh when I'm
00:12:39
talking about imaging, I'm talking
00:12:41
about, you know, capturing images that
00:12:43
uh perhaps are captured by space
00:12:45
payloads or unmanned aerial vehicles uh
00:12:48
and tagging that imagery to, you know,
00:12:51
geoloccation on the ground for use. For
00:12:53
example, Hurricane Sandy just came
00:12:55
through. There are any number of
00:12:58
organizations that need to look at
00:13:00
patterns of what's happening with
00:13:02
flooding as it relates to levies as it
00:13:04
relates to, you know, other critical
00:13:06
infrastructure that's on the ground. We
00:13:08
have abilities to take layers and layers
00:13:10
of data and make it accessible for use
00:13:13
not only by uh military organizations.
00:13:15
For example, in the case of solving
00:13:17
improvised explosive device issues, but
00:13:21
also available to commercial uh and
00:13:23
federal uh agencies to use that
00:13:25
information for what they need to do on
00:13:27
the ground to execute their mission. So,
00:13:29
it's taking all these layers of data and
00:13:31
imagery and and using them in meaningful
00:13:32
ways. So, this is cameras on satellites
00:13:35
basically. Is that is that correct? Yes.
00:13:36
Well, it it starts there, but it can
00:13:38
also be cameras or infrared devices on
00:13:41
unmanned aerial vehicles as well. Okay.
00:13:43
Other areas um that that you've
00:13:45
developed special expertise in that can
00:13:48
apply to uh commercial areas that that
00:13:51
would be interesting to know about.
00:13:52
Well, you know, I think I mentioned a
00:13:54
couple of them. Um you know, we're
00:13:56
trying to look for opportunities. We've
00:13:58
looked at uh you know, some energy
00:14:00
harvesting solutions. We've looked at
00:14:02
some power generating solutions because
00:14:04
we have a power solutions business that
00:14:06
have commercial applications for first
00:14:08
responders and things like that. Um, you
00:14:10
know, basically we try and and orient
00:14:12
our businesses to bring forth good ideas
00:14:14
like this for potential investment that
00:14:16
have wider applicability and potential
00:14:18
market applications in commercial as
00:14:20
well as military markets. And so we're
00:14:22
we're constantly trying to explore the
00:14:24
frontier of what's possible. So those
00:14:26
power applications would be what sort of
00:14:27
portable portable generators? Yeah. Uh
00:14:30
portable uh in power inverters that
00:14:32
could be on vehicles and yield maybe
00:14:35
three or four or five times the power
00:14:37
that previously could be done by a
00:14:39
commercial alternator. Where this is
00:14:41
important is in theater for example
00:14:43
where on vehicles now you have the
00:14:45
radios plus you have geo positioning
00:14:48
equipment plus you have jammers and you
00:14:50
have other command and control
00:14:51
applications all of which consume great
00:14:53
amounts of power for a military
00:14:55
application. The same is true now with
00:14:57
first responders who have ever more
00:14:59
capability that are going on their
00:15:01
vehicles that has to be powered somehow
00:15:03
and so we have a capability to do that
00:15:05
that we've developed. anything more
00:15:07
you'd like to tell us about your
00:15:08
strategy going forward before we we uh
00:15:10
end our discussion? Well, I I just think
00:15:13
uh you know, Excelis is a new company.
00:15:15
We're one year into our our new history.
00:15:17
Uh but of course, we come from a 50-year
00:15:19
legacy of defense capabilities within
00:15:21
ITT Corporation. So, it's it's a new
00:15:24
company by name, but an old company by
00:15:26
capability. And I think the frontiers
00:15:28
that we're trying to explore now, you
00:15:30
know, for our Department of Defense as
00:15:32
well as our other customers and
00:15:34
emphasizing those technologies that are
00:15:36
really going to be important for the
00:15:37
future like networking, like imagery,
00:15:40
like electronic warfare. Those are the
00:15:42
kind of things that I'm excited about
00:15:43
and I know our employees are as well.
00:15:45
And so, uh, we think we have a bright
00:15:46
future ahead of us and we're going to
00:15:48
keep, uh, working to bring our customers
00:15:50
the right things that they need to be
00:15:51
successful. Thanks for joining us. Thank
00:15:53
you.
00:15:57
[Music]

Episode Highlights

  • Defense Industry Shifts
    The defense industry is facing a significant downturn, prompting companies to adapt and innovate.
    “It's like turning the Queen Mary.”
    @ 03m 08s
    December 07, 2012
  • Spin-off Success
    After spinning off from ITT, the company has seen positive returns and growth opportunities.
    “We came on the market at 10.33 and as of yesterday we were at 10.99.”
    @ 05m 04s
    December 07, 2012
  • Future Technologies
    The company aims to focus on networking, imagery, and electronic warfare for future growth.
    “We think we have a bright future ahead of us.”
    @ 15m 46s
    December 07, 2012

Episode Quotes

  • We’re trying to grow in those latter two arenas certainly.
    Defense Companies Face a "Transformer" Challenge Under Leaner Budgets
  • The military's gone so high-tech in recent years.
    Defense Companies Face a "Transformer" Challenge Under Leaner Budgets
  • We’re a new company by name, but an old company by capability.
    Defense Companies Face a "Transformer" Challenge Under Leaner Budgets

Key Moments

  • High-tech Military01:43
  • Company Spin-off04:14
  • Future Focus15:46

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Views from a Top Contractor: David Melcher, president of Defense Electronics and Services at ITT
April 03, 2009
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
07:47
Views from a Top Contractor: David Melcher, president of Defense Electronics and Services at ITT
A View From Above: Charles Szews Oshkosh Corporation
April 06, 2010
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
07:40
A View From Above: Charles Szews Oshkosh Corporation
A View From Above: Mike Stolarik, QinetiQ North America
May 12, 2011
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
09:53
A View From Above: Mike Stolarik, QinetiQ North America
A View from Above: Lucy Reilly Fitch, Senior VP, Corporate Communications, BAE Systems, Inc.
April 10, 2009
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
10:20
A View from Above: Lucy Reilly Fitch, Senior VP, Corporate Communications, BAE Systems, Inc.
A View From Above: Steve Gaffney, DynCorp
May 12, 2011
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
13:21
A View From Above: Steve Gaffney, DynCorp
A View From Above: Bradley Feldmann Cubic Defense Applications
April 06, 2010
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
05:05
A View From Above: Bradley Feldmann Cubic Defense Applications
A View From Above: Dennis Carroll Raytheon Missile Systems
April 06, 2010
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
08:51
A View From Above: Dennis Carroll Raytheon Missile Systems
A View from Above: Jack Harrington, VP command & control systems, Raytheon Network Centric Systems
May 01, 2009
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
13:15
A View from Above: Jack Harrington, VP command & control systems, Raytheon Network Centric Systems
A View from Above: Justin Ryan, VP, Strategic Planning and Marketing, Honeywell Aerospace
April 24, 2009
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
09:59
A View from Above: Justin Ryan, VP, Strategic Planning and Marketing, Honeywell Aerospace
A View From Above: Gerard DeMuro, General Dynamics
May 12, 2011
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
12:55
A View From Above: Gerard DeMuro, General Dynamics
A View From Above: Roger Krone Boeing Network and Space Sys
April 06, 2010
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
12:30
A View From Above: Roger Krone Boeing Network and Space Sys
A View From Above: David Oliver, EADS North America
May 12, 2011
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
16:40
A View From Above: David Oliver, EADS North America