Search Captions & Ask AI

'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value

June 05, 2012 / 23:39

This episode features CB Bhattacharya and Shenar Khosrowpour discussing their book on corporate responsibility. They cover the increasing focus on corporate responsibility among CEOs, board members, and stakeholders, driven by consumer awareness and demand for ethical practices.

Bhattacharya explains how their interest in corporate responsibility began with a conversation with Ben Cohen of Ben & Jerry's, leading to research on consumer perceptions and corporate actions. They emphasize the importance of understanding stakeholder reactions and the need for companies to communicate effectively about their corporate responsibility efforts.

The authors introduce their three U's model: understanding, usefulness, and unity, which highlights the psychological aspects of consumer loyalty and engagement with responsible brands. They also discuss the significance of integrating corporate responsibility into business strategy for long-term success.

Key insights from their research include the necessity for companies to focus on outcomes rather than inputs in their communication strategies. They argue that stakeholders prefer companies to demonstrate tangible impacts rather than just promoting their efforts.

Overall, Bhattacharya and Khosrowpour stress the importance of sincerity and long-term commitment to corporate responsibility, suggesting that companies can create value for both society and their business by genuinely addressing stakeholder needs.

TL;DR

CB Bhattacharya and Shenar Khosrowpour discuss corporate responsibility, stakeholder perceptions, and their three U's model for business success.

Episode

23:39
00:00:01
[Music]
00:00:08
[Music]
00:00:19
it's a pleasure to have this opportunity
00:00:20
to talk with you both CB and shenar uh I
00:00:23
really enjoyed reading your book on
00:00:24
corporate responsibility I think it
00:00:26
offers a great uh framework uh and a
00:00:28
strong evidentiary base spanning lab
00:00:30
experiments the recent headlines
00:00:32
Financial economics um I guess I'd like
00:00:34
to start by asking you why you think
00:00:36
CEOs board members stakeholders more
00:00:38
broadly are increasingly focused on
00:00:39
corporate responsibility and hungry uh
00:00:41
for the kind of framework that you
00:00:42
provide in this
00:00:44
book one of the reasons is that
00:00:46
stakeholders today are increasingly
00:00:48
conscious of not just buying a good
00:00:50
product but also kind of where does the
00:00:52
product come from so who's the company
00:00:54
that stands behind the product so that's
00:00:56
something that we've seen in the
00:00:57
consumer space and so they increasing
00:01:00
pressure on companies to kind of deliver
00:01:03
and make themselves you know look
00:01:05
responsible in in the eyes of the market
00:01:08
the same way employees today they don't
00:01:10
want just a paycheck I mean they want
00:01:12
something more from a company they want
00:01:13
a sense of fulfillment of in terms of
00:01:16
where they work so companies again you
00:01:19
know even in a reactive mode they have
00:01:20
to kind of you know uh get into the act
00:01:24
of of being good corporate citizens uh
00:01:26
investors as an investor movement as
00:01:28
well uh so multiple stakeholders have um
00:01:32
or you can say society as a whole have
00:01:34
kind of uh risen up to the idea that we
00:01:38
need to um be more responsible as
00:01:42
organizations um and as corporate
00:01:44
citizens and all of that has put kind of
00:01:47
of course the the global warming and and
00:01:49
the climate change movement all of this
00:01:50
the human rights Everything Has Come
00:01:52
Together to kind of suddenly catapult
00:01:54
corporate responsibility I guess uh to
00:01:56
the Forefront great and what motivated
00:01:58
you personally to meet this Demand by
00:02:00
writing this book how did you personally
00:02:02
become interested in the
00:02:03
topic I met the CEO of Ben and Jerry's
00:02:07
uh Ben Goen a long time ago in the
00:02:09
mid90s and he asked a very interesting
00:02:11
question of me and he said can you tell
00:02:14
me whether consumers would buy our brand
00:02:17
rather than a competitor's brand because
00:02:20
of the things that we are doing in the
00:02:21
social and environmental realm uh being
00:02:24
a marketing scholar this was clearly a
00:02:26
marketing question but I had never
00:02:27
thought of you know social
00:02:29
responsibility as a driver of of
00:02:31
consumer purchase and that's when I
00:02:34
looked to my good friend here and I said
00:02:36
okay maybe we need to kind of do
00:02:37
something about this and indeed that was
00:02:40
our our U first kind of dive into into
00:02:43
this area of corporate responsibility
00:02:45
and how stakeholders react to company's
00:02:47
corporate responsibility initiatives
00:02:49
over the years there are many other
00:02:51
companies who came to us with similar uh
00:02:54
questions you know uh PNG General Mills
00:02:57
uh Target Denon I mean all of these
00:03:00
companies kind of had seemed to have
00:03:02
similar questions in mind and so our
00:03:05
body of work just kind of kept growing
00:03:07
plus there were the the whole
00:03:08
theoretical space was wide open so there
00:03:10
was question after question that one
00:03:12
could answer and at some point it looked
00:03:15
like hey I mean we've got you know a
00:03:17
portfolio here that perhaps we can
00:03:19
distill kind of and and disseminate the
00:03:22
findings to you know to to a wider
00:03:24
audience than just those who read
00:03:27
scholarly journals and I think as an
00:03:29
academic one of the things I saw um that
00:03:31
was missing the space is what CB talked
00:03:33
about which is uh the lack of an
00:03:36
academic or conceptual uh uh perspective
00:03:39
and rigor to a lot of the work that I
00:03:41
was seeing and we were seeing in in this
00:03:43
area and so we we thought that was a
00:03:47
really interesting opportunity to kind
00:03:49
of bring some of that as academics given
00:03:51
our unique backgrounds to the to the
00:03:53
questions that were raised in this area
00:03:56
so do you think the the two main
00:03:58
differences between this book and some
00:03:59
of the other pieces in the field are
00:04:00
this academic focus and the marketing as
00:04:02
a discipline um or are there other key
00:04:05
dri key differentiators of the book
00:04:07
those are two of the key ones yes I mean
00:04:09
the stakeholder perspective is is of
00:04:11
course I think um a big differentiator
00:04:14
of of this book from others no one
00:04:17
really has or prior to this no one
00:04:19
really had studied consumers and
00:04:22
employees to find out kind of from the
00:04:24
eyes of the beholder if you will kind of
00:04:26
you know what do they feel about a
00:04:28
company's um corporate responsibility um
00:04:32
if you look at websites every company
00:04:34
says that they're doing great work and
00:04:35
fantastic work uh but this was an
00:04:37
opportunity to kind of look at it from
00:04:39
from the other side and what we found
00:04:42
was uh as you can tell from the book um
00:04:45
quite quite quite telling so I would add
00:04:47
to that the you know the the fact that
00:04:49
we're looking at it through the lens of
00:04:51
the stakeholder is a big
00:04:53
differentiator I was curious about the
00:04:54
labeling there's so many top uh labels
00:04:56
turned around responsibility social
00:04:58
responsibility sustain ability uh how do
00:05:00
you differentiate corporate
00:05:02
responsibility uh from some of these
00:05:03
other um some of these other topics
00:05:06
these other
00:05:08
labels
00:05:10
uh the way I address it typically is
00:05:14
that corporate responsibility is U kind
00:05:16
of a means to an end and and the end
00:05:18
would really be sustainability where we
00:05:21
are thinking of uh the people the planet
00:05:24
and as businesses of course we're
00:05:25
thinking of profit so that triple bottom
00:05:27
line is where we want to get to
00:05:30
and companies are but one of the agents
00:05:34
that can kind of take us there and when
00:05:36
companies engage in what it takes to get
00:05:39
to fulfill that triple bottom line uh we
00:05:41
call that corporate responsibility we
00:05:43
we've clarified that kind of in the book
00:05:45
in in in very simple terms and because
00:05:48
we are not dealing with the the other
00:05:51
actors such as responsible consumerism I
00:05:53
mean that's a big field in of itself
00:05:55
that's that's emerging now um you know
00:05:57
or or or any uh social entrepreneurship
00:06:00
which is another thing that's kind of
00:06:01
leading into it we figured that
00:06:04
corporate responsibility was perhaps the
00:06:06
best label um and the most honest label
00:06:09
for for us in this book okay um you
00:06:12
ground a lot of the analysis in the book
00:06:14
at the level of the individual uh
00:06:15
drawing on psychological research and
00:06:17
experiments uh including many that
00:06:19
you've conducted yourself uh could you
00:06:21
highlight some of the key insights that
00:06:22
come out of this research for people who
00:06:23
are interested in corporate
00:06:25
responsibility um well we we from the
00:06:28
very beginning we took a very contingent
00:06:30
approach in trying to understand
00:06:32
stakeholder reactions our basic premise
00:06:34
was that not everyone is going to react
00:06:36
the same way which is very consistent
00:06:38
with our understanding of how human
00:06:40
beings behave and think and react to not
00:06:42
only what companies do but what happens
00:06:44
in the world around them so uh in that
00:06:47
sense uh so that's the approach that we
00:06:49
took and what we found were uh as it
00:06:52
summarized in the book there was some
00:06:53
key insights the first is that uh a lot
00:06:56
of the people we talk to are not really
00:06:58
fully understanding of what exactly
00:07:01
companies were doing so awareness was
00:07:02
very low uh we found that uh even when
00:07:05
they knew what was happening there were
00:07:07
certain dimensions of their
00:07:09
understanding that really mattered when
00:07:10
it came to how stakeholders at
00:07:13
particular consumers React to what
00:07:14
companies do uh that included uh things
00:07:18
like uh what kind of attributions they
00:07:20
made about why a company is doing what
00:07:23
it's doing which is very key as you know
00:07:25
in this space uh it also related to uh
00:07:29
what expectations they had coming into
00:07:32
what a company should be doing so those
00:07:33
were some of the things and then um uh
00:07:36
finally one of the key things that we
00:07:37
thought really ma what we found really
00:07:39
mattered is uh are are the the consumers
00:07:43
feeling that what the companies are
00:07:45
doing really does something for them
00:07:46
personally and that's very much in line
00:07:48
with the entire uh uh perspective on
00:07:51
consumer needs and things like that so
00:07:55
um I would say those are the key things
00:07:57
anything else yeah I mean in simple
00:07:59
terms we were able to distill this into
00:08:00
the form of of a of of a model um that
00:08:04
folks might find easier to remember and
00:08:06
we call it the three use model and and
00:08:08
we label them understanding usefulness
00:08:12
and unity and unity is really the sense
00:08:14
of belongingness between the company and
00:08:16
the individual uh which drives outcomes
00:08:20
such as kind of loyalty positive word of
00:08:22
mouth resilience to negative information
00:08:24
so we studied outcomes that are really
00:08:27
of interest to to businesses I mean they
00:08:30
and uh businesses have been coveting
00:08:33
these outcomes for a long time and what
00:08:34
we are able to do through this uh micr
00:08:37
psychological perspective is we are able
00:08:38
to show that corporate responsibility
00:08:41
indeed can contribute to these outcomes
00:08:44
even when you hold you know all else all
00:08:46
else all else constant so we are able to
00:08:49
show Fairly convincingly that this is an
00:08:51
additional driver of kind of you know uh
00:08:55
marketing uh and and business coveted
00:08:57
coveted outcomes one of the things
00:08:59
that's interesting is you're able to
00:09:00
draw a contrast you're able to say it's
00:09:02
not just what the company is doing that
00:09:04
may or may not be responsible but how
00:09:06
it's perceived uh and so the perceptions
00:09:08
among consumers and employees are really
00:09:10
what drives outcomes um that gives a
00:09:12
real prominence to the media strategy
00:09:14
and the communication strategy uh that
00:09:16
the company employs can you speak a
00:09:17
little bit about your findings there
00:09:19
yeah I mean communication becomes
00:09:22
absolutely key I mean as I said one
00:09:25
thing was that first of all we found
00:09:26
awareness to be low and a very simple
00:09:30
truth is that if people don't know what
00:09:31
you're doing there is no way that they
00:09:33
can reward you so companies will have to
00:09:35
work on increasing that awareness
00:09:38
however that's a slippery slope because
00:09:40
in our research we found that you know
00:09:42
stakeholders often times uh you know
00:09:45
receive these messages as kind of
00:09:47
propaganda from from from companies or
00:09:50
self-promotion so one of the
00:09:52
implications that we kind of highlight
00:09:54
in the book is that when it comes to
00:09:56
talking about your corporate
00:09:57
responsibility you know tell don't sell
00:10:00
so so don't try to make more of it than
00:10:01
you actually have uh but rather give the
00:10:04
facts out there what we find is that
00:10:07
stakeholders really want companies to be
00:10:10
outcome focused rather than input
00:10:12
focused and what that means is that in
00:10:14
uh don't say that we are spending
00:10:16
hundreds of millions of dollars on on
00:10:18
solving this crisis but rather say that
00:10:20
we've actually saved 100 lives or or
00:10:23
we've kept you know 200 people warm from
00:10:25
the cold winter so if you focus on what
00:10:28
you've achieved as a company in the
00:10:31
corporate responsibility realm that
00:10:33
makes a much bigger difference than kind
00:10:35
of if you just keep on saying that yes
00:10:37
we are you know we we are trying so we
00:10:40
do list these implications um which you
00:10:43
know if companies follow that in their
00:10:45
communication strategy and media
00:10:48
strategy I think they can navigate
00:10:50
what's a reasonably complicated path
00:10:52
it's not straightforward because you
00:10:54
know unlike advertising which which
00:10:56
everybody accepts as okay I mean
00:10:57
Company's trying to sell stuff in when
00:11:00
it comes to corporate responsibility um
00:11:02
there's far more skepticism and and what
00:11:05
we are able to to do in in the
00:11:07
communication strategies is we are
00:11:08
suggesting kind of ways to to to
00:11:10
navigate this path and uh achieve kind
00:11:13
of a a good outcome for the companies
00:11:16
the the one thing I would add to that is
00:11:18
uh also in terms of communication one of
00:11:21
the things we found is that if you can
00:11:23
really address in your Communications
00:11:25
what is it that you're doing in terms of
00:11:27
the needs of your consumer your
00:11:29
stakeholders and if you can address that
00:11:31
very clearly I don't know if you
00:11:32
remember the shell example that we had
00:11:34
in uh one of the earlier chapters where
00:11:37
uh we think one of the key uh issues
00:11:40
there was that they did not really think
00:11:42
about okay what is it that the this
00:11:44
community needs as we're trying to do
00:11:47
good in the environmental space and they
00:11:49
didn't communicate that
00:11:51
effectively so and in what form of media
00:11:55
I mean are we talking about using U
00:11:57
broadcast media using printed media
00:11:58
using social media how do you integrate
00:12:00
these these different forms of the
00:12:02
communication strategy to Target
00:12:03
individual stakeholders with the message
00:12:05
of the outcomes and your uh your efforts
00:12:08
in this
00:12:10
area I I think it spans all of them uh
00:12:14
in our book at this point we did not get
00:12:16
into that level of the kind of the media
00:12:18
planning strategy and and kind of at
00:12:20
what point um or or with which Target
00:12:23
segment a particular media strategy
00:12:25
might be more effective um than another
00:12:27
I think that would have to be kind of on
00:12:29
a case-by Case basis depending on on the
00:12:31
company and and and the context um if
00:12:34
you look at the real world I mean there
00:12:36
is a fair amount of print media as far
00:12:39
as corporate responsibility is concerned
00:12:41
and that's clearly an important one
00:12:43
because people do get a little bit of
00:12:45
time to kind of process the information
00:12:47
that's given uh but social media clearly
00:12:49
you know um things like uh Facebook and
00:12:53
so on have have become also increasingly
00:12:55
prominent um I don't think that what
00:12:58
have the the implications that we've
00:13:00
come up with are kind of more applicable
00:13:03
to a certain form of media or less
00:13:04
applicable to a certain form of media
00:13:06
but rather I think it's best to say that
00:13:09
we would work that out depending on a
00:13:11
particular company context and I think
00:13:13
one of the key points we make is that
00:13:15
when it comes to your media strategy you
00:13:16
have to again segment you know your
00:13:19
stakeholders in your market in terms of
00:13:21
you know what messages you want to go to
00:13:23
which group at what stage of the
00:13:25
evolution of your uh corporate
00:13:28
responsibility
00:13:29
initiatives um uh so you know if you
00:13:34
take if you take Nestle as an example
00:13:35
you know they they identify thought
00:13:37
leaders in the space and they send them
00:13:39
personal Communications whereas they
00:13:41
might put out General ads and then they
00:13:43
have their corporate responsibility
00:13:45
reports so it's really a mixture of and
00:13:48
then they have to address you know if an
00:13:49
NGO attacks them in the social media
00:13:51
space they'd have to be Savvy enough to
00:13:55
to um you know address that issue in
00:13:58
that space
00:14:00
um throughout the book you you provide a
00:14:01
wealth of of great anecdotes and
00:14:04
experiences of individual companies with
00:14:05
with whom you've worked I wonder how
00:14:07
different you feel the the the
00:14:09
perception and the Sea Suite is about
00:14:10
the respons the importance of
00:14:12
sustainability corporate responsibility
00:14:14
uh from the classroom from future
00:14:16
managers and and what explains that
00:14:18
Gap well you know evidence recent
00:14:21
evidence suggests that the SE Suite is
00:14:24
uh taking notice of of of what's going
00:14:27
on and there was a recent stud by
00:14:29
accenta that was actually published in
00:14:31
Business Week where they surveyed um
00:14:34
CEOs and seite U managers and they all
00:14:38
had very um strong unequivocal concerns
00:14:42
about kind of uh sustainability and the
00:14:45
important role that sustainability would
00:14:46
would play kind of in the um um in the
00:14:50
corporate world kind of in in the years
00:14:52
to come um are they actually going to
00:14:55
take note of the details no perhaps not
00:14:57
so for them the message is very simple
00:14:59
from our book I think for the sea Suite
00:15:01
that the message is that the only way
00:15:03
corporate responsibility makes uh a
00:15:06
difference both to society as well as to
00:15:09
the bottom line of the company is if it
00:15:10
is fully integrated into the strategy of
00:15:13
the company that it ought not to be kind
00:15:15
of a Bolton and um you know if if you
00:15:18
give it that respect and if you if you
00:15:20
think about it similar to what you would
00:15:22
think about your business strategy
00:15:23
overall then and only then can you
00:15:26
actually create create value and one
00:15:29
important message that we emphasize is
00:15:31
that the only way to creating value
00:15:34
through corporate responsibility U
00:15:36
business value through corporate
00:15:37
responsibility is to create social value
00:15:39
first so creating social value when I
00:15:42
say social I mean environmental as well
00:15:44
so creating social and or environmental
00:15:45
value is a prerequisite to creating
00:15:48
business value through corporate
00:15:50
responsibility in other words there are
00:15:51
no shortcuts and if if this is a message
00:15:54
that we can actually communicate to the
00:15:56
SE Suite in in simple terms and I have
00:15:59
some tangible examples of where managers
00:16:01
have taken one slide kind of you know
00:16:03
from from our presentation and say okay
00:16:05
this is the one we're going to show um
00:16:07
and uh then I think you know all they
00:16:10
need to do is to then you know give give
00:16:12
go down the chain of command and say
00:16:14
okay guys we need to think about this uh
00:16:16
a little bit differently and uh then
00:16:18
hopefully we'll make a difference so the
00:16:20
this um Bears a lot of similarity to
00:16:22
Michael Porter's recent work on shared
00:16:23
value with Mark Kramer um it's a
00:16:27
seductive appeal to say we can do do
00:16:29
well create profits and create value for
00:16:31
all stakeholders but at the end of the
00:16:33
day we also have to capture that value
00:16:34
uh for our shareholders capture our
00:16:36
share of it uh if we just create social
00:16:39
uh welfare if we just create uh total
00:16:41
benefits uh how do we know that in the
00:16:43
end we'll sustain ourselves as a company
00:16:45
so what advice do you have in terms of
00:16:47
making sure that the company captures
00:16:48
its share of the value it's creating as
00:16:51
opposed to it all being distributed to
00:16:52
external
00:16:55
stakeholders in the approach we take I
00:16:58
mean if if you think about the outcomes
00:17:00
that we study I mean you know if if a
00:17:02
consumer is more loyal to the company's
00:17:06
products or says good things about the
00:17:09
company then that value is acing to to
00:17:13
to the company I mean in in our
00:17:15
framework there is we we are looking at
00:17:18
social value and environmental value and
00:17:20
we're looking at um you know business
00:17:24
value so and our models and and
00:17:27
uh statistical models as as well as the
00:17:30
conceptual Frameworks are able to
00:17:32
demarcate you know between between the
00:17:36
the the creating value for the society
00:17:38
part as well as creating value for for
00:17:40
the company part uh so when an employee
00:17:42
basically stays longer at the company or
00:17:44
is going to be more productive which we
00:17:46
also able to show statistically then
00:17:48
that value is essentially being you know
00:17:51
uh is is essentially being captured or
00:17:53
is acing to to to the company and we
00:17:56
don't see that Danger of of it being
00:17:59
lost I think it comes back to the basic
00:18:01
premise of our book which is that there
00:18:03
is a demand for for uh corporate
00:18:06
responsibility and sustainability from
00:18:09
the companies from the external
00:18:10
stakeholders and so if a company does
00:18:14
that then the stakeholders will reward
00:18:16
them because their needs are being
00:18:18
fulfilled it's also obvious from reading
00:18:20
the book that you're drawing a lot on
00:18:21
statistical studies lab experiments I
00:18:23
wonder you know if there's one that you
00:18:25
think is uh particularly powerful that
00:18:27
you'd like to share with us uh and share
00:18:28
with the
00:18:29
audience one all right well you start
00:18:32
the one the one that stands out for me
00:18:34
always uh is the work that we did with
00:18:37
uh yogurt companies yogurt brands um we
00:18:41
we
00:18:41
contrasted uh Stony field which is very
00:18:44
well known for its work in the uh
00:18:47
corporate responsibility space with
00:18:49
other brands which actually are you
00:18:51
could argue equally involved but are not
00:18:55
really positioned completely or not
00:18:57
fully identified with that and what we
00:19:00
found was very interesting um in that uh
00:19:04
the consumers of Stonyfield felt much
00:19:07
closer to the brand identified felt more
00:19:10
Unity with the brand and ultimately
00:19:13
rewarded the brand more than consumers
00:19:14
of the other brands even though all the
00:19:16
other brands uh were quite actively
00:19:19
engaged in corporate responsibility and
00:19:21
I think to me that really encapsulates
00:19:24
the essence of the book uh which is that
00:19:27
you know if you really understand your
00:19:29
stakeholders if you really know what
00:19:30
they're looking for and if you can uh
00:19:33
deliver on that as part of your
00:19:34
corporate responsibility uh initiatives
00:19:38
then that's going to going back to your
00:19:40
previous question that's going to uh
00:19:43
help you capture more of the value from
00:19:45
it than if you're just kind of doing it
00:19:47
in a sort of scatter shock way let me
00:19:50
add a quick one if I may and this is a
00:19:53
different methodology and this was a
00:19:54
secondary uh data study where uh with
00:19:58
another co-author actually uh uh not the
00:20:01
three who wrote the book but with
00:20:02
another co-author I studied uh Fortune
00:20:04
1,000 companies and what we did was we
00:20:07
related corporate responsibility to the
00:20:09
market value of the firm and what we
00:20:11
found there was that there was these
00:20:13
interesting interactions between
00:20:14
corporate responsibility and the product
00:20:17
quality of the firm and and
00:20:18
innovativeness of the firm and this data
00:20:20
we got from Fortune's most admired
00:20:22
companies and it turned out that you
00:20:24
know corporate responsibility you know
00:20:27
positively contributed to market value
00:20:30
only in those contexts where the firm
00:20:32
was perceived to have good product
00:20:34
quality and was perceived to be
00:20:35
Innovative uh which is interesting
00:20:37
because it shows that mere engagement in
00:20:39
corporate responsibility does not
00:20:41
necessarily yield to kind of you know uh
00:20:43
Better Business returns for for for the
00:20:45
company but you have to as a company you
00:20:48
have to have your house in order so to
00:20:50
speak and you have to make sure that you
00:20:52
know the fundamentals such as product
00:20:54
quality and Innovation uh must be also
00:20:57
up to Snuff you know before a firm goes
00:20:59
out and kind of engages in in in in
00:21:01
corporate responsibility so this one
00:21:03
helps to tie the role of corporate
00:21:06
responsibility with other kind of
00:21:08
strategic elements of the firm in in a
00:21:10
very nice way and again kind of makes it
00:21:12
easier to for for Senior Management to
00:21:15
see why corporate responsibility
00:21:17
actually needs to be integrated into the
00:21:18
business strategy great um what do you
00:21:21
think is the most important Point uh
00:21:22
managers need to remember about
00:21:23
corporate responsibility uh that should
00:21:25
guide their actions today and in the
00:21:27
future
00:21:29
okay
00:21:31
um they should they should basically
00:21:33
remember that again corporate
00:21:36
responsibility has to be thought of in
00:21:38
terms of a long run strategy that it
00:21:41
it's not something that gives immediate
00:21:43
returns you cannot make a difference uh
00:21:46
in the immediate run and you have to
00:21:49
kind of um work hard at it so if there's
00:21:52
one thing we learned from the book is
00:21:54
that it pays to be responsible only when
00:21:59
your stakeholders perceive that there's
00:22:02
some difference that you're making to
00:22:03
the community and and and to the
00:22:05
environment so the sincerity of the firm
00:22:09
um is kind of you know is absolutely has
00:22:12
to be U unquestionably there and if you
00:22:16
make that difference then and only then
00:22:18
can you can you reap reap the value so
00:22:20
we say that there is value to be
00:22:22
extracted but it's not it's not kind of
00:22:26
you know um there to be grabbed it's
00:22:28
it's not simple so you have to kind of
00:22:30
work hard and make a difference to
00:22:32
society and the environment to kind of
00:22:34
kind of get that value out but it's a
00:22:36
win-win for for all so the triple bottom
00:22:39
line is not a zero sum game in other
00:22:41
words which is seems to be kind of a
00:22:44
belief in the in the corporate world
00:22:45
that if we do uh invest in corporate
00:22:48
responsibility we're doing that at the
00:22:50
cost of our business I think our book
00:22:51
clearly shows that that's that's not the
00:22:53
case and the only thing I would add to
00:22:55
that is
00:22:56
um understand and respond to your
00:22:59
stakeholders and it's easy to say but
00:23:02
it's I think quite challenging at the
00:23:04
operational level and I think if
00:23:06
companies can figure out how to do that
00:23:08
effectively um I think that would make a
00:23:10
big
00:23:11
difference thank you very much thank you
00:23:14
thank you for having us
00:23:22
[Music]

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 70
    Best concept / idea
  • 60
    Best overall

Episode Highlights

  • The Rise of Corporate Responsibility
    Stakeholders are increasingly demanding corporate responsibility from companies, driven by social and environmental concerns.
    “We need to be more responsible as organizations.”
    @ 01m 38s
    June 05, 2012
  • Understanding Stakeholder Reactions
    Not everyone reacts the same way to corporate actions; awareness and perceptions are key.
    “Awareness was very low.”
    @ 07m 02s
    June 05, 2012
  • The Three U's Model
    The model highlights understanding, usefulness, and unity as key drivers of stakeholder loyalty.
    “We call it the three U's model: understanding, usefulness, and unity.”
    @ 08m 08s
    June 05, 2012
  • The Value of Corporate Responsibility
    Corporate responsibility positively impacts market value when product quality and innovation are high.
    “Corporate responsibility positively contributed to market value only in those contexts where the firm was perceived to have good product qua”
    @ 20m 24s
    June 05, 2012
  • Long-Term Strategy Required
    Corporate responsibility should be viewed as a long-term strategy, not a quick fix.
    “Corporate responsibility has to be thought of in terms of a long run strategy.”
    @ 21m 36s
    June 05, 2012
  • Stakeholder Engagement is Key
    Understanding and responding to stakeholders is crucial for effective corporate responsibility.
    “If companies can figure out how to understand and respond to their stakeholders, it would make a big difference.”
    @ 22m 59s
    June 05, 2012

Episode Quotes

  • Companies today must be good corporate citizens.
    'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value
  • Tell, don't sell.
    'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value
  • Creating social value is a prerequisite to creating business value.
    'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value
  • Corporate responsibility is not something that gives immediate returns.
    'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value
  • It pays to be responsible only when your stakeholders perceive a difference.
    'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value
  • The sincerity of the firm is absolutely necessary to reap the value.
    'Leveraging Corporate Responsibility': The Stakeholder Approach to Maximizing Social Value

Key Moments

  • Corporate Responsibility01:38
  • Stakeholder Awareness07:02
  • Three U's Model08:08
  • Corporate Responsibility Insights19:24
  • Long-Term Commitment21:43
  • Stakeholder Perception21:59
  • Sincerity Matters22:09
  • Engagement Challenges23:02

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Nicholas Kristof's 'Path' to More Effective Giving
November 11, 2014
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
15:50
Nicholas Kristof's 'Path' to More Effective Giving
Small Actions, Big Difference
January 06, 2020
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
35:41
Small Actions, Big Difference
A Plan for CEOs Who Want to Do Good
January 30, 2015
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
23:39
A Plan for CEOs Who Want to Do Good
Guiding the Next Stage of Impact Investing’s Evolution
July 20, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
17:52
Guiding the Next Stage of Impact Investing’s Evolution
Rebuilding Corporate Governance in India
June 21, 2010
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
41:04
Rebuilding Corporate Governance in India
Improve Employee Engagement | Wharton Prof. Peter Cappelli — the Ripple Effect Podcast
July 25, 2023
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
26:22
Improve Employee Engagement | Wharton Prof. Peter Cappelli — the Ripple Effect Podcast
Climate Crisis: Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility | Brian Berkey — Ripple Effect Podcast
April 20, 2023
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
23:00
Climate Crisis: Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility | Brian Berkey — Ripple Effect Podcast
Why Social Entrepreneurs Should Pressure-Test Their Ideas
June 19, 2013
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
20:47
Why Social Entrepreneurs Should Pressure-Test Their Ideas
Building Relationships with External Stakeholders
May 07, 2014
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
11:04
Building Relationships with External Stakeholders
Where ESG Fits into the Future of Business
March 17, 2026
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
16:16
Where ESG Fits into the Future of Business
Doing Good, Doing Well
July 13, 2015
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
19:27
Doing Good, Doing Well
How Strong Stakeholder Relationships Can Help Your Firm Avoid a Crisis
October 20, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
24:15
How Strong Stakeholder Relationships Can Help Your Firm Avoid a Crisis