Search Captions & Ask AI

Google fires protestors, NPR chaos, Humane's AI Pin, Startup tax crisis, sports betting scandal

April 19, 2024 / 01:36:52

This episode discusses the Breakthrough Prize event in Los Angeles, featuring guests like Yuri Milner and Priscilla Chan, and highlights significant moments including emotional awards related to cystic fibrosis and Parkinson's disease. The hosts share their experiences at the event, including interactions with celebrities like Vin Diesel and discussions about the importance of celebrating scientific achievements.

The conversation shifts to the impact of the Breakthrough Prize, likening it to a modern Nobel Prize, and emphasizes the need for public recognition of groundbreaking work in science and technology. The hosts express admiration for the event's production quality and the inspiring stories shared by award recipients.

Later, the hosts discuss the chaotic nature of workplace protests, specifically focusing on Google employees who were fired for protesting the company's involvement in a project with Israel. The discussion covers the implications of workplace activism and the balance between employee rights and corporate policies.

The episode also touches on the challenges faced by startups due to recent tax laws affecting R&D expenses, highlighting the potential negative impact on innovation and small businesses. The hosts express concern over the bureaucratic hurdles that hinder growth in the tech industry.

Finally, the hosts delve into the mainstream acceptance of sports betting, discussing its societal implications and the recent scandal involving NBA player Jontae Porter, who was banned for life due to gambling-related misconduct.

TL;DR

The episode covers the Breakthrough Prize event, workplace protests at Google, tax challenges for startups, and a sports betting scandal in the NBA.

Video

00:00:00
Sam did you go down to the Breakthrough
00:00:01
thing this weekend the Breakthrough
00:00:03
prize was amazing it's like observing
00:00:05
exotic animals in their natural habitat
00:00:08
well a friend of mine who you hung out
00:00:09
with down there called me last night to
00:00:12
give me the breakdown on all the
00:00:13
individuals he saw and what was going on
00:00:15
with them I mean he's like I don't even
00:00:17
know how Nat and I keep getting invited
00:00:19
to this but like to say we were outclass
00:00:21
is an understatement the people at that
00:00:23
thing were what is it break rewards the
00:00:25
Breakthrough prize yeah yeah I couldn't
00:00:27
make it I got invited to sh so
00:00:29
incredible okay first of all shout out
00:00:31
to Yuri and Julia it is incredible there
00:00:33
were two moments where I cried this
00:00:37
woman goes up on stage to give an award
00:00:40
to the people that had made this
00:00:42
investment in cystic fibrosis yeah and
00:00:45
she says my child was born with cystic
00:00:48
fibrosis and then my second child was
00:00:50
born with cystic fibrosis and then my
00:00:52
second child died she said that I just
00:00:55
burst into tears and then you present an
00:00:58
award to the person that actually is
00:01:00
helping them Stamp Out the disease we
00:01:02
celebrated the people that found the
00:01:04
gene that caused Parkinson's and then
00:01:06
yeah I mean the the people at that is
00:01:08
pretty incredible it's in LA right they
00:01:11
did it in Los Angeles yeah I mean like
00:01:12
look Yuri Milner and Julia
00:01:15
Milner Zuck and Priscilla Chan and Andi
00:01:20
and so gabrian those six people are the
00:01:22
ones that organize this breakthrough
00:01:23
prize and I think it's just a modern
00:01:26
version of the Nobel which tries to
00:01:29
really shine a spotlight on people doing
00:01:31
really groundbreaking work in physics
00:01:33
and math and life
00:01:35
sciences and so you get people that have
00:01:38
just done things that are just very
00:01:41
practical and are very
00:01:44
real and I think what they do is they
00:01:46
make frankly these kinds of
00:01:49
achievements much
00:01:51
more high level in the sense that you're
00:01:53
bringing together people from Hollywood
00:01:55
and people from Silicon Valley and the
00:01:57
awareness is up and it's just incredibly
00:01:59
well produced
00:02:01
yeah it's really a cool thing to be a
00:02:03
part of but I mean seeing some of these
00:02:05
people are very intimidating I sat
00:02:07
beside Vin
00:02:09
Diesel oh really that was super cool he
00:02:13
is a super nice guy and on the other
00:02:16
side of me was someone that actually
00:02:18
saxs knows Toby emerik who's U was the
00:02:20
chairman of Warner Brothers so just
00:02:22
talking to these guys was super cool
00:02:24
moving it to Los Angeles was a great
00:02:26
movea yeah it's just I was invited I
00:02:29
couldn't make it Sor and thank you to
00:02:30
Julia and Yuri for inviting us again but
00:02:34
it's really great that they're giving it
00:02:37
the celebration it deserves and making
00:02:40
it you know like dare I say sexy and
00:02:43
cool and hip to be a scientist and solve
00:02:46
the world's biggest problems I I think
00:02:47
it's just so awesome and you're right
00:02:49
Sergey Bren Amo
00:02:52
jaie Sak Priscilla and Julia and Yuri
00:02:56
are the founders of the Breakthrough the
00:02:58
craziest thing is they give a they give
00:03:00
a youth breakthrough award so the
00:03:01
Breakthrough prize is this beautiful
00:03:03
globe and then the junior winner gets
00:03:05
like a smaller version very appropriate
00:03:08
and it was a video of this kid in India
00:03:11
who had won it a few years ago and then
00:03:14
went off to MIT and then
00:03:16
graduated and then the video is of him
00:03:18
coming back to Bangalore because his
00:03:21
sister had won it this year and he
00:03:24
presented to the sister and all I could
00:03:26
think of was this is an incredible
00:03:29
achievement by like a 16-year-old and
00:03:32
literally at the same time my
00:03:34
16-year-old was like Dad the chicken
00:03:36
tenders from door
00:03:39
Dash you get I can't find my chicken
00:03:43
fingers let your winners
00:03:46
ride Rainman
00:03:48
[Music]
00:03:51
David we open source it to the fans and
00:03:54
they've just gone crazy with it love you
00:03:56
Queen
00:03:59
Dad I said get me the spicy fries not
00:04:02
the regular cinjun fries the girl that
00:04:05
wanted freeberg did something with
00:04:07
yamaka
00:04:09
factors so it's like it's really
00:04:11
incredible and inspiring but fortunately
00:04:13
don't worry my my 16-year-old was able
00:04:16
to get the chicken tenders and
00:04:17
everything was fun oh okay good yeah
00:04:19
shut you called rerouted it
00:04:22
I can't get his chicken tenders what do
00:04:25
we do hilarious but by the way the other
00:04:28
the other thing I'll say is
00:04:30
the person that performed is really
00:04:31
amazing Charlie peth and and the reason
00:04:33
I say it is if you Google Charlie
00:04:38
peth this guy he's a young guy in his
00:04:42
early 20s I'm guessing he is so talented
00:04:44
there's all these videos of Charlie PE
00:04:46
where he'll make a random noise like
00:04:48
he'll clink a coke bottle with a fork
00:04:51
and then he'll record it and then he'll
00:04:53
put it into these digital editing tools
00:04:56
and then he'll make like a entire five
00:04:58
minute song using that as the base like
00:05:01
as the basic building
00:05:03
block the guy is so
00:05:07
talented anyways it was a very it was a
00:05:09
very cool event fantastic how are you
00:05:12
doing sax you okay buddy I'm good it's
00:05:15
good
00:05:16
start there it is folks we're back it's
00:05:19
gonna be a hell of a show let's go I got
00:05:22
to do don't waste time with your with
00:05:24
your pointless banter it's why people T
00:05:26
it in it's the banter they the banter
00:05:28
bro how you doing free bir what you got
00:05:30
a little uh scene from the movie
00:05:34
Her wow we're off to a strong start here
00:05:36
look at all these
00:05:38
contributions I got a shrug from
00:05:40
freeberg I got a gr let's get started
00:05:43
from Sachs I don't talk about my backg
00:05:45
rats let's go anything good on the menu
00:05:47
tonight shth I just want I'm coming over
00:05:48
for poker I wanted to know if there's
00:05:49
anything octopus oh so the Greek comes
00:05:53
back and you get the octopus on you get
00:05:55
the octopus I I think that Sean missed
00:05:57
you he did by the way sea experimented
00:05:59
with with some Greek cheese that you
00:06:01
grill that was pretty delicious that
00:06:03
back
00:06:04
chei a what's the plural of octopus is
00:06:07
it octopi yeah aren't they like Cent
00:06:11
creatures or something halumi yeah uh
00:06:13
you know what it's interesting you bring
00:06:15
that up I had a grilled octopus stand at
00:06:18
one of our events and somebody who is um
00:06:23
you know a
00:06:24
conscientious consumer of
00:06:26
calories Lobby me to take the grilled
00:06:29
octopus off of the menu I won't say who
00:06:33
what what wait what I got lobbied very
00:06:37
strongly not only is it deeply wrong to
00:06:39
eat all the animals that you people eat
00:06:42
and you will one day realize it or your
00:06:44
children or your children's children
00:06:45
will realize it but octopus in
00:06:47
particular have the IQ of four to eighty
00:06:50
olds they can actually sign they can
00:06:53
communicate they can solve problems uh
00:06:56
you can watch YouTube videos on this
00:06:57
it's pretty incredible they're amazing
00:06:59
creatur it's also why in the movie The
00:07:01
Arrival the future alien race is made
00:07:04
out to be seops because they're the most
00:07:07
advanced creature that's likely to
00:07:09
become a civilized form if humans didn't
00:07:11
exist I have a one-w reaction to that
00:07:15
yum delici Del yummy it's the IQ that
00:07:19
makes it taste so good oh my God that's
00:07:23
dark that's
00:07:25
dark you're saying the IQ is like the
00:07:27
spice yeah it's kind of like the fat
00:07:30
content you know it's kind of like the
00:07:31
marbling it's the marbling it's the
00:07:33
marbling of it that's dark I don't know
00:07:35
oh oh yeah by the way thanks guys yeah
00:07:37
I'm fine yeah I'm great I'm feeling
00:07:39
great yeah the tooth is healed I got the
00:07:40
Imp you look like you've been eating
00:07:42
well just only things with above are you
00:07:46
off the wovi or the what do you call it
00:07:48
well no no you know what I did was I got
00:07:50
off the wovi so I could eat more animals
00:07:53
and now I'm getting back on because I
00:07:54
feel I feel so terrible about how many I
00:07:58
was in Austin I ate every
00:08:00
let me ask question yeah go ahead if you
00:08:03
eat high IQ foods does it make you
00:08:06
smarter absolutely absolutely this is
00:08:08
why the Greeks invented so many things
00:08:10
we invented math Plumbing cities
00:08:12
democracy all the great things the
00:08:14
Greeks created comes from the fact that
00:08:17
we ate so many high IQ creatures correct
00:08:19
are you able to be vegetarian were you
00:08:20
able to find good vegetarian or veggie
00:08:23
options in
00:08:25
Austin who talking to me
00:08:28
yeah I I mean I I see a vegetable I push
00:08:31
it
00:08:31
away I'm like wait a second Jakel was on
00:08:34
a seafood diet in Austin if he saw food
00:08:37
he ate
00:08:38
it J but it's not inaccurate the
00:08:42
barbecue in Austin is so spectacular
00:08:45
Terry Black's beef ribs I had with a
00:08:48
friend of ours man they're just dynamite
00:08:51
and then the Salt Lick brisket
00:08:53
Franklin's brisk I mean it is just
00:08:55
extraordinary shout out to all my
00:08:57
barbecue folks there and sorry for
00:08:58
triggering every
00:08:59
that wasn't button down J battered and
00:09:04
barbecue sauce
00:09:06
and that took out the rib was the Bison
00:09:08
I'm sorry I was way apologies to the
00:09:10
audience it took out a tooth you know as
00:09:12
as far as I feel worth it what is a
00:09:14
bison rib taste like is it taste like be
00:09:16
man I it is it's the beef ribs are very
00:09:19
tender the bison's got a little more
00:09:20
chew to it it's a little more texture
00:09:22
yeah and and they let this thing go at
00:09:25
the Salt Lick for like 12 hours and
00:09:28
they're just
00:09:30
barbecue sauce in it forever it's a
00:09:31
little chewy and so that's what took out
00:09:33
the tooth but great job freeberg on
00:09:36
moderating episode was fantastic yes I I
00:09:39
was chomping on the bit quite literally
00:09:40
sacks to talk about some stuff chomping
00:09:42
on the bit to the point I thought I
00:09:43
shattered a tooth but I am back and I
00:09:46
have so much energy I missed you guys I
00:09:48
actually missed y'all freeberg so much
00:09:50
good stuff happening with the summit and
00:09:53
uh I'm delighted that John is doing all
00:09:55
this work you're doing all this work and
00:09:57
I can just sit back and enjoy it so tell
00:10:01
us is there an update on the summit yeah
00:10:03
you're just collecting your coupon but
00:10:05
uh yeah we had within 72 hours I think
00:10:09
we had more applications than we have
00:10:11
seats but we are still leaving
00:10:13
applications open and in the next week
00:10:15
we'll start to respond to people so
00:10:19
basically if you're interested in going
00:10:20
to the
00:10:21
summit sign up now get your applications
00:10:23
in this week apply early yeah is the key
00:10:26
yeah because it's going to be done in
00:10:28
order of when it's received
00:10:30
and they're going to start processing
00:10:31
applications this week we'd love to get
00:10:34
everyone that wants to show up show up
00:10:36
and if you went in the past your
00:10:39
registration window is wrapped up this
00:10:41
week so that's alumni automatically get
00:10:45
in alumni automatically are in and then
00:10:48
tell us about the scholarship because
00:10:49
I'm getting bombarded and everybody
00:10:51
who's an upand cominging all-in fan
00:10:53
we're going to announce it in a couple
00:10:54
of weeks so no plan yet but there will
00:10:56
be yeah we'll still do scholarships
00:10:58
because I think they were super
00:10:59
successful and helpful to people that
00:11:01
otherwise couldn't afford the ticket I
00:11:02
know it's expensive this year but the
00:11:04
reason was we actually spent a lot more
00:11:06
per person last year than people
00:11:09
actually paid for their tickets so same
00:11:11
it's less than 10 so yeah we're trying
00:11:13
to get the priced so that we can make um
00:11:15
make this thing break even and we're
00:11:17
gonna have scholarship tickets with the
00:11:19
balance great so should be awesome I saw
00:11:21
a couple speakers come in there's two
00:11:23
not talking about it yet not talking
00:11:24
about come on just can we just tell the
00:11:26
two speakers who said yes come on the a
00:11:29
not yet we do a big announ landed a big
00:11:31
speaker and I think it's gonna be
00:11:33
awesome in a week in a week we'll
00:11:35
announce a bunch together listen well
00:11:36
one thing I don't want to wait on is
00:11:37
today's docket because it is
00:11:39
unbelievable welcome everybody to
00:11:41
episode
00:11:42
175 that's right it's episode 175 of
00:11:45
your favorite podcast and the largest
00:11:48
and most listened to podcast in the
00:11:50
world officially episode 175 of the
00:11:52
all-in podcast starts right now and ah I
00:11:55
got so many feelings about this is that
00:11:57
the largest most listen to podcast in
00:11:59
the world I'm manifesting oh you're
00:12:01
manifesting I'm manifesting shth just
00:12:04
like just like is the world's greatest
00:12:06
poker player and then we watch Robo roll
00:12:09
over him is that a new word that
00:12:11
narcissists use for lying manifesting no
00:12:14
it's just like you know the world's
00:12:16
greatest poker player and then we see
00:12:17
Phil helmuth get dominated by by C Jason
00:12:20
just so you know tonight is a
00:12:22
murderer row and helmuth is flying back
00:12:25
you saw the lineup I'm very excited to
00:12:27
see what happens tonight is J and
00:12:29
coming or no yeah I mean and Robel
00:12:33
and then the world's greatest helmuth
00:12:34
playing is so great to watch it's like a
00:12:37
meta ego battle no it is and those you
00:12:40
know what's interesting two of those
00:12:41
three guys are like the most humble guys
00:12:43
you would ever meet in your life am I
00:12:46
correct in your life just you could you
00:12:48
could not be more lowkey and
00:12:50
self-effacing than Robel and for
00:12:52
how good they are and and but if you
00:12:54
were honestly going to rank the three of
00:12:56
them in a in a high stakes cash game
00:12:58
could you just hand it for the audience
00:13:00
because we are in a we're in a lucky
00:13:01
position you and I to play with these
00:13:03
three epic players in the world break
00:13:06
down how they play in a home game you
00:13:09
know like
00:13:11
ours
00:13:14
so I would say the most
00:13:18
dynamic range would probably be Robel
00:13:20
because Robel has the most experience
00:13:22
playing super super high stakes
00:13:24
cash I think is the most
00:13:31
precise
00:13:34
and like true to
00:13:36
GTO hard to exploit I mean is
00:13:39
impossible to exploit impossible doesn't
00:13:41
no no mistakes no mistakes no mistakes
00:13:43
Robel knows how to gamble in certain
00:13:45
spots knows how to be
00:13:47
unexploitable and the third player is
00:13:50
philam the third person is and hel just
00:13:53
loses his mind it is
00:13:56
so no the thing with helmuth is he's
00:13:58
made he's capable unlike anyone I've
00:14:00
ever seen a folding in spots that are
00:14:03
and and he's correct by the way I've
00:14:04
seen H fold Ace King in spots that none
00:14:07
of us would ever do it I've seen them
00:14:08
fold Kings in spots that are basically
00:14:10
impossible so Huth is able to get these
00:14:12
Soul reads on people that I
00:14:15
think are amazing yeah but look the the
00:14:20
the higher and higher the stakes get the
00:14:22
more and more I think Robel will be
00:14:25
comfortable and and will just go to
00:14:27
a Playbook that he knows and trusts
00:14:29
H I am I'm so excited to be back at the
00:14:33
game tonight all right listen the docket
00:14:36
is so great this week we got a great
00:14:37
classic all-in docket I want to start
00:14:39
with Google firing 28 employees who were
00:14:42
involved in this protest at their
00:14:44
offices we didn't think that this would
00:14:46
happen we were having a discussion on
00:14:48
the group chat on Tuesday about a dozen
00:14:50
employees engaged in stins at the
00:14:51
company's offices in Sunnyvale and New
00:14:53
York City
00:14:55
protesting the conflict in the Middle
00:14:58
East between between Israel and
00:15:00
Palestine and so they took over
00:15:03
literally took over the offices of the
00:15:05
uh CEO of Google cloud and nine
00:15:08
employees were arrested after refusing
00:15:10
to leave the protest was organized by a
00:15:11
group called No tech for apartheid and
00:15:15
they posted a bunch of clips of this sit
00:15:17
in on X those 28 employees were fired on
00:15:22
Wednesday after a quick investigation
00:15:24
the VP of Global
00:15:25
Security was pretty direct and candid
00:15:29
me this is based they took over office
00:15:32
spaces defaced our property and
00:15:35
physically impeded the work of other
00:15:36
googlers Behavior like this has no place
00:15:39
in our workplace and we will not
00:15:41
tolerate it if you're one of the few who
00:15:43
are tempted to think we're going to
00:15:45
overlook conduct that violates our
00:15:46
policies think again so what were the
00:15:49
protests about Google is uh involved in
00:15:52
a project Nimbus a $1.2 billion Cloud
00:15:54
contract with Israel's government both
00:15:57
Google and Amazon are involved in the
00:15:58
project which was announced in 2021
00:16:00
Google has denied it was doing work for
00:16:02
the military saying it was working with
00:16:05
departments like Finance Healthcare
00:16:06
Transportation there's a lot of details
00:16:08
to this but let's start with you freberg
00:16:10
since you were a googler and we've been
00:16:12
talking about the culture of Google
00:16:14
putting aside what the protests were
00:16:16
about how do you feel about protests in
00:16:20
the workplace we've talked about it
00:16:22
before here with coinbase and others and
00:16:25
then is this a distinct change in tone
00:16:29
that I'm hearing from Google that
00:16:31
they've had enough of social activism at
00:16:34
the
00:16:36
office I mean yeah there's obviously a
00:16:38
line crossed in in the the view of
00:16:43
security but I think you could look at
00:16:46
this two
00:16:47
ways you could look at this as being a
00:16:50
culture of
00:16:51
entitlement that let folks feel that our
00:16:54
employees that they have
00:16:56
permission to stage stins and behaviors
00:16:59
like this because Google is so
00:17:01
infinitely tolerant in giving employees
00:17:05
the space and the room to do whatever
00:17:08
they want to do and all of their wishes
00:17:10
and demands can be met and will be met
00:17:13
if they demand it strongly enough that's
00:17:15
one way to look at this and that that
00:17:17
culture manifested this Behavior another
00:17:20
way to look at it is that these people
00:17:22
feel so deeply strongly and passionately
00:17:24
about the issue at hand that they were
00:17:26
willing to risk their jobs and arrest
00:17:29
and they cared so deeply about an issue
00:17:31
that they think no one's paying enough
00:17:32
attention to that they're willing to put
00:17:33
themselves and sacrifice themselves for
00:17:35
it so I I want to be empathetic to that
00:17:38
point of view as well but I do think
00:17:41
that
00:17:42
there's a belief that there may have
00:17:44
been this kind of entitlement culture
00:17:47
where anytime Google employees ask for
00:17:49
stuff they get it someone told me the
00:17:51
other day how at tgfs at Google Now
00:17:54
where they do these all hands and people
00:17:55
get to ask questions this person is kind
00:17:57
of executive level they're so sick and
00:17:59
tired of how every question is all about
00:18:02
employees asking for more things that
00:18:04
they want so it's like when are we going
00:18:07
to get this bonus when are we going to
00:18:08
get this gym when are we going to get
00:18:10
this that's so much of the orientation
00:18:12
of being an employee at Google is all
00:18:14
about what Google can do for me and how
00:18:16
I can get more and that becomes what you
00:18:19
ask for it's like you give a kid
00:18:20
something you give them candy they
00:18:21
always ask for
00:18:22
candy and I think that there's certainly
00:18:25
an element of that culture kind of being
00:18:29
froed up over the years at Google but I
00:18:31
do think that this is an issue that
00:18:32
people care very passionately about
00:18:34
right now and you're seeing it all over
00:18:35
the place so certainly not in the same
00:18:38
week we had uh the Golden Gate Bridge
00:18:40
get shut down the Bay Bridge get shut
00:18:42
down as well shath your thoughts on
00:18:43
these protests and then obviously the
00:18:46
entitlement issues that freeberg alludes
00:18:49
to specifically at alphabet gooogle
00:18:52
they're two separate things and I think
00:18:54
it's important to deal with them
00:18:56
individually
00:18:58
groups of people in society in a
00:19:01
democracy should have a right to protest
00:19:03
that's absolutely fundamental and I
00:19:06
think they can raise a lot of issues
00:19:08
that could otherwise get swept into the
00:19:10
carpet when that stuff impedes the
00:19:13
public functioning of society for other
00:19:15
people then I think there's a
00:19:17
responsibility for law enforcement and
00:19:20
other people to act and make sure that
00:19:23
that is better managed so shutting down
00:19:27
an entire Bridge is not only disruptive
00:19:30
it can be really dangerous of course and
00:19:33
it can hurt your cause because then
00:19:35
people people dislike the cause because
00:19:36
it hurt them right typically what
00:19:38
happens is you're supposed to file for a
00:19:40
permit to protest and when you get that
00:19:42
there are areas that are cordoned off
00:19:44
and then people allowed to express their
00:19:45
views that's a really healthy form of
00:19:47
democracy going rogue like this will
00:19:49
only blow up in people's faces because
00:19:51
the folks that are somewhat sympathetic
00:19:53
will eventually get burned by this
00:19:55
experience and turn against them so
00:19:56
that's one set of issues I think that's
00:19:58
just people going rogue and I think that
00:20:01
you can't be tolerant of that kind of
00:20:02
chaos there should be organized protests
00:20:05
but not disorganized chaos and law
00:20:07
enforcement needs to get a control of
00:20:09
that inside of a company I think this is
00:20:11
different it's this weird thing that I
00:20:13
see which is like what I would call like
00:20:15
left-on-left violence it's like left
00:20:17
leaning people creating all of these
00:20:20
distractions and demonstrations inside
00:20:22
of left leaning organizations for not
00:20:24
being left leaning
00:20:25
enough and so it's kind of like a little
00:20:28
bit nutty because I think it actually
00:20:31
shows how totally naive these employees
00:20:33
are and what basic business
00:20:36
understanding they have the first and
00:20:38
foremost being that they are at will
00:20:40
employees these are not people that are
00:20:42
contracted players in the NBA or are
00:20:45
part of a union okay where you have
00:20:47
guaranteed employment through some
00:20:49
mechanism or some arbitration process to
00:20:51
even be let go the fact that you don't
00:20:53
even understand that you are at will
00:20:55
means that you are there because you
00:20:56
want to be there and Google allows you
00:20:58
to be there because they choose for you
00:21:00
to be there and at any point if either
00:21:01
of you break a covenant you can be
00:21:04
gone that kind of stuff I think is very
00:21:06
distracting and it just belies a poor
00:21:09
understanding of what you're there to do
00:21:11
Google is a for-profit business and they
00:21:14
are in the business of generating
00:21:16
maximum profit on behalf of their
00:21:17
shareholders they are also incentivized
00:21:21
to do that in a way that achieves a
00:21:22
mission and a set of values that the
00:21:24
majority of their employees agree with
00:21:28
and the fact that a small cohort of
00:21:30
people can try to hijack and sabotage
00:21:32
that overall direction I think is very
00:21:37
misguided saxs I I don't know if you
00:21:40
have any opinions on this I didn't see
00:21:41
anything in the docket I'm not sure if
00:21:43
you have any strong feelings here but
00:21:45
your thoughts on Google employees and
00:21:47
the protest putting aside you know the
00:21:50
the nature of the protest this could be
00:21:51
for BLM this could be for Trump's
00:21:54
indictments you could you could be
00:21:55
protesting any number of things but the
00:21:57
protesting at work is is and then Google
00:22:00
specifically which we talked about with
00:22:02
the Gemini issues and you know this
00:22:05
stuff bleeding over into product I think
00:22:06
freeberg said it really
00:22:08
nicely hey are are people actually
00:22:11
focused on products at Google anymore or
00:22:14
is the whole place just focused on
00:22:16
social issues that have nothing to do
00:22:18
with their waning apparently product
00:22:20
scent well I Google had no choice but to
00:22:23
fire these employees they were being
00:22:25
disruptive and they were trespassing and
00:22:28
Google has the business to run so this
00:22:29
is what any business would do and I
00:22:31
don't think they deserve either credit
00:22:33
or blame for taking the action they took
00:22:36
in terms of the protesters themselves I
00:22:39
think
00:22:40
that in the fullness of time we may come
00:22:43
to think of them in a slightly different
00:22:46
light and some of this reminds me a
00:22:48
little bit of of Another War the
00:22:50
protesters in another War the Vietnam
00:22:53
War where they were very disruptive in
00:22:56
some cases they trespassed in some cases
00:22:58
they got arrested they were easy to make
00:23:00
fun of in terms of what they look like
00:23:02
they were sort of unkempt unshaven all
00:23:05
the rest of that stuff they were hippies
00:23:07
and at the time people were I'd say very
00:23:10
dismissive of them or actually
00:23:13
antagonistic they were seen as giving
00:23:14
Aid and comfort the enemy and they were
00:23:16
sort of demonized but now in the
00:23:19
fullness of time we look back on that
00:23:21
war and realize that they had a point in
00:23:22
fact maybe they were right in fact maybe
00:23:25
their actions were Justified and I think
00:23:29
that how we view these protesters at
00:23:31
Google can't just be judged now I think
00:23:33
it's going to have to be judged in the
00:23:34
fullness of time based on how we
00:23:36
perceive this war in Gaza and I want to
00:23:38
make two points about why I think this
00:23:41
war will eventually be viewed as
00:23:43
Israel's Vietnam the first is that in
00:23:47
Gaza Israel faces a a gorilla style
00:23:52
force and they're in a quagmire and if
00:23:55
you read the latest news that's coming
00:23:57
out of Gaza
00:23:58
what you'll hear is that after Israel
00:24:02
has supposedly cleared an area like Gaza
00:24:04
City or con Yunis they then move South
00:24:07
Hamas has po back up again this whole
00:24:10
idea that they can clear an area has
00:24:12
been proven false it's like playing
00:24:14
whacka they basically hit Hamas in one
00:24:16
area Hamas disappears down the tunnels
00:24:19
they come back in a different area and
00:24:21
this is why you're seeing a lot of
00:24:22
Articles now in harat which is Israeli
00:24:24
newspaper saying the war in Gaza is
00:24:26
already lost you had the Wall Street
00:24:27
Journal
00:24:29
last week run an article saying that
00:24:31
Israel is winning every battle but
00:24:34
losing the war which is the again shades
00:24:38
of Vietnam here and you got to
00:24:41
understand the Wall Street Journal is
00:24:42
the most pro-israel of all the major
00:24:44
mainstream Publications I don't think
00:24:46
the W stre Journal has ever written a
00:24:47
truly critical article about Israel and
00:24:50
they describe this guacal Dynamic you
00:24:53
also have the general Gotti eisenkop
00:24:56
who's a a member of
00:24:58
the war cabinet these member of of the
00:25:00
sort of War government in Israel came
00:25:03
out and said that we can degrade Hamas
00:25:05
in Gaza but we cannot destroy it and he
00:25:08
said anyone who's telling you that we
00:25:09
can destroy Hamas is telling you a tall
00:25:12
tale and that was I think an appointed
00:25:13
reference to netanyahu's claim that they
00:25:15
would destroy Hamas and Gaza so you've
00:25:19
got shades of Vietnam in terms of it
00:25:21
being this unwinable War I think the
00:25:22
second aspect of of a similarity to
00:25:26
Vietnam is just the huge number of Civ I
00:25:28
Ian casualties you recall that in
00:25:30
Vietnam the Viet Kong tried to grab us
00:25:33
by the belt buckle they knew that
00:25:34
America had Superior Firepower so they
00:25:36
tried to get in close use ambushes booby
00:25:40
traps snipers and in response to that
00:25:43
the Americans used immense amounts of
00:25:45
Firepower and bombing to try and subdue
00:25:48
the Vietnamese and 3.4 million vietnames
00:25:52
were killed in that war according to
00:25:54
Robert
00:25:55
mcnamer the second thing that happened
00:25:57
is the Rules of Engagement in Vietnam
00:25:59
got extremely loose you took a bunch of
00:26:01
scared American Kids many of whom were
00:26:03
conscripts you drop them in a jungle
00:26:05
pretty much because they feared ambushes
00:26:07
they shot anything that moved and then
00:26:09
finally I think partly to justify this
00:26:12
you had a a dehumanization of the
00:26:16
Vietnamese that they were seen as as
00:26:18
somehow kind of subhuman in any event if
00:26:20
you watch movies about Vietnam like
00:26:22
platoon which was made by Oliver Stone
00:26:24
who was a GI in Vietnam or if you watch
00:26:28
uh stainley Kubrick's Masterpiece Full
00:26:29
Metal Jacket which was based on books
00:26:31
about Vietnam you can see these Dynamics
00:26:34
in play very vividly now turn to to Gaza
00:26:38
all you got to do is look at the miles
00:26:39
and miles of video to see it looks like
00:26:43
a lunar surface I mean even in the words
00:26:45
of Joe Biden there's been indiscriminate
00:26:47
bombing there in terms of the Rules of
00:26:49
Engagement The Rules of Engagement have
00:26:50
gotten very loose a week or two ago you
00:26:53
had the desk of those seven Aid workers
00:26:55
from the international kitchen or
00:26:58
organization and there's an article in
00:27:00
haret recently about the kill zones have
00:27:02
been set up pretty much if you come
00:27:04
within a certain invisible perimeter of
00:27:06
Israeli troops you can be shot I mean
00:27:07
those are the rules of engagement and
00:27:09
this is why there were three Israeli
00:27:10
hostages who escaped and they were
00:27:14
running towards Israeli troops and
00:27:16
yelling in Hebrew and they still got
00:27:18
shot and again this goes back to the
00:27:19
Rules of Engagement being very loose and
00:27:21
then the final piece of it is you do
00:27:23
have this
00:27:24
dehumanization going on of the
00:27:26
Palestinians you can see this in a lot
00:27:27
of the have been posted by IDF soldiers
00:27:30
so look I think that these protesters
00:27:33
their actions are going to be judged in
00:27:35
the fullness of time I think there are
00:27:38
actually good reasons to believe that
00:27:41
Israel's war in Gaza it's shades of
00:27:43
Vietnam and I think that over the long
00:27:46
term people may regard these protesters
00:27:48
in a different light right now they're
00:27:50
just seeing as being disruptive and
00:27:52
annoying and interfering but if this war
00:27:56
ends up being Israel's Vietnam which I
00:27:58
think it's on track to be again I think
00:28:01
that people may in time give these
00:28:02
protesters a little bit more credit J
00:28:05
what do you think interesting question
00:28:08
you know putting aside what they're
00:28:09
protesting about I think they knew or
00:28:13
some number of them knew they were going
00:28:15
to get fired so I think they're kind of
00:28:17
resigning by sit in and I think yeah
00:28:19
there could be nobility to that if you
00:28:22
do not want to
00:28:23
participate in supporting things in the
00:28:25
world you do not have to work at Google
00:28:27
and you can protest and you can get
00:28:30
fired and we've seen like some pretty
00:28:32
intense protests I I don't know if you
00:28:33
guys are aware of like what green peace
00:28:35
and other environmentalists did to stop
00:28:37
whing I'm sure you are aware freedberg
00:28:40
was your passion on the subject those
00:28:42
people went to jail in Japan for
00:28:44
boarding Japanese whing ships like those
00:28:47
are really intense protesters but then
00:28:49
to your point shth you know you you can
00:28:52
really hurt your cause clim act climate
00:28:55
activists have been throwing paint on
00:28:56
works of art I don't know if you've seen
00:28:57
that and and that's just infuriating
00:29:00
like I I have no tolerance for people
00:29:02
destroying works of art or attempting to
00:29:04
get attention here it is benign to sit
00:29:07
in an office and get fired so I I just
00:29:10
consider it resigning by sit in if they
00:29:12
want to do that that's fine I do think
00:29:14
there is something to Google enabling
00:29:16
all this to your point Friedberg over
00:29:18
time and and listen they were parodied
00:29:21
on Silicon Valley the TV show because of
00:29:25
how coddled and entitled people are so
00:29:27
there's a a bunch of things going on at
00:29:29
the same time and you know if you want
00:29:32
to do these intense protests you have
00:29:34
the right to do them and history will
00:29:36
judge you o over time but you need to be
00:29:38
able to pay the price in this case the
00:29:40
price is getting fired in the case of
00:29:43
like shutting down the Golden Gate
00:29:44
Bridge like you should get a fine for
00:29:46
doing that I believe and the fine should
00:29:48
be based on whatever that cost to shut
00:29:49
that bridge down um and and that's got
00:29:52
to be a serious fine and you're right
00:29:54
Cham people if there's an emergency
00:29:56
situation somebody's got to get to a
00:29:57
hospital hospital or something that's
00:29:59
what I always think about when I see
00:30:01
those things when you block streets and
00:30:02
stuff or you block airports or you block
00:30:04
these throughways there's a lot of just
00:30:07
normal everyday people trying to live
00:30:08
their life who are probably very
00:30:09
sympathetic to what yeah what you stand
00:30:12
for but when you disrupt their everyday
00:30:14
lives Andor threaten their physical
00:30:18
security they're not going to think that
00:30:20
that's worth it I'm also shocked that
00:30:23
these people actually came to an office
00:30:24
I mean these googlers I don't think
00:30:26
they've actually been to an office
00:30:27
before they probably check that their
00:30:28
badges were you know to saak to Sax's
00:30:31
point I actually would have had more
00:30:33
respect for these people if they
00:30:34
actually
00:30:35
protested the war but they didn't do
00:30:38
that they had a very discreet specific
00:30:40
claim which was that they wanted to
00:30:43
dissolve a business deal that Google had
00:30:45
to provide cloud services to the state
00:30:47
of Israel called project Nimbus and I
00:30:50
think that's such a discreet thing that
00:30:53
it's hard to understand that those 28
00:30:55
people would have even enough knowledge
00:30:58
of what that is but it sounds like a
00:31:00
cloud hosting deal well what's hosted
00:31:02
there and it could be any number of
00:31:04
things and I suspect if it's a billion
00:31:06
dollar a year deal it's many things it's
00:31:08
probably like the Israeli DMV is that
00:31:10
really what you want and I think that it
00:31:12
would have been much of a more powerful
00:31:16
thing to do to protest the actual War if
00:31:18
that's what they cared about you know
00:31:20
duve tailes nicely with the discussion
00:31:21
you all had last week about would you
00:31:23
back a not a defensive but an offensive
00:31:27
weapon company a technology company and
00:31:30
uh it seemed like you all had
00:31:32
reservations on if you would not back a
00:31:34
defensive one anybody I think reasonably
00:31:37
would back a defensive you know Dome or
00:31:40
interception of bombs coming in that's
00:31:42
an easy one but going around the horn
00:31:44
here how many of us would back a company
00:31:48
making missiles or bombs that blow
00:31:52
people up or mines would you back a
00:31:54
robot that had weapon systems on it I
00:31:58
think if you want to summarize what we
00:31:59
said last week it's like there are all
00:32:02
kinds of businesses where you'll end up
00:32:03
investing in it and over time as it
00:32:07
morphs some of us will be faced with
00:32:09
some of those decisions and it'll it'll
00:32:11
frankly depend on what is the
00:32:13
alternative in that moment so I don't
00:32:16
think
00:32:16
anybody of us are going into go and
00:32:20
build a nuclear bomb but you should not
00:32:22
be naive that if you're building nuclear
00:32:25
reactors you could end up being in a
00:32:27
situation where that thing geted into
00:32:30
into a that you either agree or disagree
00:32:32
with so this is my point is I think that
00:32:34
those kind of answers or those kinds of
00:32:38
questions are missing the nuances and
00:32:41
the nuances are very important so it's
00:32:43
impossible to answer this question in a
00:32:44
thoughtful way I think would be my my
00:32:46
honest answer okay saak any any closing
00:32:48
thoughts
00:32:49
here well I I think um chth brings up an
00:32:53
interesting point about why didn't the
00:32:56
protesters just focus on the war itself
00:32:58
rather than Google doing business with
00:32:59
Israel my interpretation of that is
00:33:01
they're trying to create a Nexus to
00:33:03
themselves meaning their employees of
00:33:05
Google they're trying to create a reason
00:33:07
for them to Stage the Sittin at Google
00:33:11
otherwise you know if they just grab
00:33:12
picket signs and were on the street it
00:33:14
would just be much less newsworthy so I
00:33:16
think they were just trying to create
00:33:17
something newsworthy here and it's kind
00:33:19
of worked in the sense that we're
00:33:21
talking about it other people are
00:33:22
talking about it so that's my
00:33:24
interpretation of that is they were just
00:33:26
trying to at the the issue in in a
00:33:29
slightly novel way but look I think that
00:33:32
they should be willing to pay the price
00:33:34
of getting fired or getting arrested I
00:33:36
mean if you're going to engage in that
00:33:37
kind of Civil Disobedience or protest
00:33:40
you should be willing to accept the
00:33:41
price and I did see some comments by the
00:33:44
googlers who got fired saying that they
00:33:46
thought they're being treated unfairly
00:33:47
by Google I think that's the wrong
00:33:49
attitude I think the attitude is hey
00:33:52
this cause is so important to me that
00:33:53
I'm willing to accept the price of being
00:33:56
fired saying that you don't deserve to
00:33:58
be fired for disrupting the workplace
00:34:00
that is kind of an entitled attitude so
00:34:03
I think they should have just said yeah
00:34:04
we did this on purpose because yeah it's
00:34:07
PR say I'm proud to get I'm proud to get
00:34:09
fired because that's how much I believe
00:34:11
in it my stock options at right Google
00:34:14
are less important than this issue to me
00:34:16
yeah and I and I'm I'm accept it I think
00:34:19
they would have gotten just as much
00:34:20
press if they actually protested the War
00:34:22
I think in a week from now everybody
00:34:24
will forget what project Nimbus is the
00:34:26
odds that it gets canel are less than
00:34:28
zero and everybody will move on and it
00:34:31
will not add to the drum beat as sack
00:34:33
said of people that may be eventually on
00:34:36
the right side of this issue
00:34:38
theoretically I say theoretically
00:34:39
because it that's that that stone is
00:34:42
still yet to be overturned on that topic
00:34:44
so I think that they missed the
00:34:46
mark and I think the the part of the
00:34:49
press that people glommed on to was it
00:34:51
was happening inside of a company in
00:34:53
real time and there was video of it
00:34:56
mission accomplished for them we're
00:34:57
talking about here as the top story and
00:34:59
uh you know if that was there if they
00:35:01
wanted to raise awareness they succeeded
00:35:04
and they should just own their firing
00:35:06
because they knew they would get fired I
00:35:07
think all right there has been a ton of
00:35:10
chaos and the culture wars continue over
00:35:13
NPR couple things happened
00:35:15
simultaneously this week that are worth
00:35:17
discussing Katherine Mah was named NPR's
00:35:20
new CEO back in January I'm gonna have
00:35:21
to give a little bit of a timeline here
00:35:23
before I get comments from the boys
00:35:26
because there's a little setup
00:35:28
and so she was named the the um CEO back
00:35:31
in January she officially started in
00:35:32
March okay she formerly worked at
00:35:34
Wikipedia Foundation those are the
00:35:36
people who run the Wikipedia obviously
00:35:39
NPR's Mission if you don't know is to
00:35:41
create a more informed public one
00:35:44
challenged and invigorated by a deeper
00:35:46
understanding and appreciation of events
00:35:48
ideas and culture that's their state ad
00:35:49
Mission from their website on April 9th
00:35:52
Erie Berliner an editor who's been with
00:35:54
NPR for 25 years wrote an oped for bar
00:35:58
bar Weiss's Free Press friend of the Pod
00:36:00
explaining how NPR lost America's trust
00:36:02
by going hard left and becoming
00:36:04
close-minded he said quote an
00:36:06
open-minded Spirit no longer exists
00:36:08
within NPR and now predictably we don't
00:36:11
have an audience that reflects America
00:36:13
last Friday Mah put out a statement
00:36:16
calling his actions profoundly
00:36:18
disrespectful hurtful and demeaning this
00:36:20
Sunday uh conservative activist
00:36:22
Christopher rufo he's uh the person who
00:36:26
exposed former
00:36:28
Harvard president's Claud and gay
00:36:29
plagiarism he's a focal critic of lgbtq
00:36:32
uh stuff at schools started reposting
00:36:35
old tweets from Mah this new CEO her
00:36:37
tweets are super far left Trump's a
00:36:40
racist yada yada there's an interesting
00:36:42
clip of her talking at Ted talking about
00:36:45
how truth is a bit of a distraction that
00:36:48
prevents people from getting things done
00:36:50
people have gotten pretty inflamed about
00:36:53
that clip and then on April 16 Berlin
00:36:58
was suspended for 5 days without pay
00:37:00
wrapping this all up Berliner then
00:37:01
resigned after 25 years saying quote I
00:37:04
cannot work in a newsroom where I am
00:37:07
disparaged by a new CEO whose divisive
00:37:10
views confirm the very problems at NPR I
00:37:13
site in My Free Press essay Sach your
00:37:17
thoughts I mean this just seems like a
00:37:19
dog bites man Story I mean what is the
00:37:22
novel Revelation here uh the person
00:37:24
running NPR is a liberal I mean I'm I'm
00:37:27
kind of with you but what took 25 years
00:37:29
to resign I mean all you have to do is
00:37:31
listen to NPR it's always been liberal
00:37:33
okay this is not some recent capture of
00:37:36
an insti why it going so crazy viral
00:37:39
right now why is this become the topic
00:37:41
of the
00:37:42
moment well apparently there are some
00:37:44
quotes that this um new CEO Katherine
00:37:48
Mar tweeted or said that you can point
00:37:51
to that seem kind of woke and kind of
00:37:55
crazy woke but they're just actually
00:37:57
pretty standard I just don't see the
00:38:00
breaking news here if they end up firing
00:38:02
Katherine Mah they're going to hire
00:38:04
someone just like her I mean they're
00:38:05
going to have the same views NPR has
00:38:07
always been left of center and the only
00:38:10
change that's happened is that the left
00:38:12
has now become woe yeah and so it's
00:38:16
become obsessively focused with the
00:38:18
ideas of white supremacy and and and
00:38:22
white privilege and she simply she
00:38:24
simply reflects that I I agree I it's
00:38:26
like a tempest and a like news flash NBR
00:38:29
is woke and left leaning I mean I guess
00:38:33
maybe that somebody who was there for 25
00:38:35
years wrote the expose is interesting or
00:38:38
I don't know jamat any thoughts on this
00:38:39
one and why it's taking up so much heads
00:38:42
space for people I don't think it is I
00:38:44
think it's taking up a lot of headp
00:38:45
space amongst breathless journalists I
00:38:48
don't think it matters to the public at
00:38:49
large I don't think anybody cares I said
00:38:51
one thing which is I do think that the
00:38:53
government should not be funding this
00:38:55
anymore I think NPR at this point is
00:38:57
mostly funded by private donations but
00:38:59
it got started with government money and
00:39:01
the government still funds it and given
00:39:04
that it is this left institution at this
00:39:08
point and and really always has been
00:39:10
there's simply no reason for the
00:39:11
government to be funding one side of the
00:39:14
political debate that way so I think
00:39:16
there is maybe an issue there in terms
00:39:18
of reminding people that hey this is
00:39:21
like government funded why and there's
00:39:23
no reason why NPR can't be funded with
00:39:26
either private donations or
00:39:28
private subscription this is uh just to
00:39:30
give people some back of the envelope
00:39:31
math NPR's budget is like 320 million
00:39:34
it's a dollar per American and they get
00:39:37
a bunch of programming fees and some
00:39:39
corporate sponsorship the corporate
00:39:40
sponsorship is like a 100 million bucks
00:39:42
the programming fees is what the local
00:39:44
radio stations play them net net this is
00:39:46
costing like maybe I don't know 30 cents
00:39:50
an American and if you just swap out and
00:39:52
this is the way I like to look at these
00:39:54
to be objective if you were saying this
00:39:55
was funding Fox News or I don't know Ben
00:39:58
Shapiro and Del wire how would you feel
00:40:00
about it you'd be like well why is the
00:40:02
government funding that they should just
00:40:03
cut NPR and all this public broadcasting
00:40:05
stuff loose over the next year or two
00:40:07
wind it down and let them fend for
00:40:10
themselves in the New Media landscape
00:40:11
look J I agree with you they could
00:40:12
easily substack it NPR's not going to go
00:40:14
away just create subscriptions and
00:40:16
you're fine yeah I mean it's only like
00:40:18
they're down to whatever it's it's it's
00:40:20
very hard to find the numbers there's a
00:40:22
little like hiding of the money here but
00:40:24
there's so little at stake here I think
00:40:25
that's why it's so contentious no
00:40:27
government should not be funding
00:40:28
one-sided ideological institutions on
00:40:31
either side of the political debate and
00:40:33
you're right if this was funding going
00:40:35
to daily wire or something like that
00:40:37
people would be up in arms so at any
00:40:40
event what's good for the good for the
00:40:41
gander the next Tempest in a teapot is
00:40:45
Humane AI pin getting barbecued by our
00:40:48
modernday W Mossberg Marquez brownley
00:40:51
who is an awesome YouTuber I love his
00:40:53
reviews and it's created a bit of a
00:40:55
social media raw shck test here
00:40:57
getting a lot of feels from people in
00:40:59
Silicon Valley let's just tee this up
00:41:01
here Humane is a hardware startup uh
00:41:03
that you may have heard of they make an
00:41:05
AI powered wearable computer it's
00:41:06
basically a pin you put on your chest
00:41:08
it's about the size of a pack of
00:41:10
cigarettes maybe half the size of it
00:41:12
founded by two apple exec back in 2018
00:41:15
raised a quarter of a billion dollars or
00:41:18
so and um the device is now in the hands
00:41:21
of reviewers it's pretty Innovative and
00:41:24
Marquez talks about how Innovative it is
00:41:26
in his review it will uh let you talk to
00:41:28
it it's got a camera on it we'll show it
00:41:31
here on the screen if you're not
00:41:32
subscribed uh to the YouTube channel
00:41:34
just go to YouTube right now and you'll
00:41:35
see us playing the video of it search
00:41:37
for Allin and um really interesting
00:41:41
interface it does obviously voice it
00:41:43
connects you to an llm on the back end
00:41:45
so if you want to know uh you know some
00:41:48
piece of information it can answer those
00:41:49
questions for you but Marquez showed it
00:41:53
just absolutely failing at a bunch of
00:41:55
tests being overpriced
00:41:58
and he called it the worst product he's
00:42:00
ever reviewed he's very thoughtful and
00:42:03
methodical but
00:42:05
the title is obviously a bit link
00:42:07
baiting as a co-founder of Eng gagger I
00:42:10
can tell you if you want to get a lot of
00:42:11
clicks just say something is the best or
00:42:13
the worst ever and you're GNA get 10
00:42:15
times the
00:42:17
views the pin uh according to him uh
00:42:21
doesn't do anything better than a
00:42:23
smartphone it's slow it doesn't work
00:42:25
it's often wrong it's 00 bucks the
00:42:28
battery sucks so many different ways to
00:42:30
go with this everybody is talking about
00:42:33
it on X and uh in the
00:42:36
media where where do you stand on this
00:42:38
one
00:42:40
freedberg both on how people are
00:42:43
responding to it in the tech industry as
00:42:45
being like anti-tech anti- Innovation
00:42:47
versus hey it's just a reviewer giving
00:42:50
his candid feedback on a product that's
00:42:52
clearly not ready for prime time I think
00:42:55
there's a lot of issues one is just the
00:42:57
challenge of deep Tech more specifically
00:43:02
in this case Hardware investing you have
00:43:04
to invest a lot of capital before you
00:43:07
even have your first product and then
00:43:09
you don't really know how well it works
00:43:11
until you've already burned through a
00:43:12
lot of capital I mean this is one of the
00:43:14
stunning stories of a startup that has
00:43:17
raised a quarter billion dollars and
00:43:19
then they come out with their first
00:43:20
product and it turns out it needs a lot
00:43:22
of work because it doesn't do anything
00:43:24
that consumers really are compelled by
00:43:27
as evidenced by the
00:43:29
review so I think it it highlights that
00:43:32
that challenge and why that market finds
00:43:36
particularly in this environment it to
00:43:37
be so hard to get capitalized now
00:43:40
obviously there are some entrepreneurs
00:43:42
like Elon who can take that capital and
00:43:47
drive to the outcome spending hundreds
00:43:50
of millions of dollars before you get
00:43:51
your first rocket into space and you
00:43:53
have a lot of failings along the
00:43:55
way but the general tone of here is a
00:43:59
deep Tech investment is very likely to
00:44:02
fail because you spend so much money
00:44:03
before you even know and at that point
00:44:05
you have less money and you can't really
00:44:06
make the necessary iteration to get
00:44:08
there so it's a tough data point for
00:44:12
other deep tech companies that need to
00:44:15
raise a lot of capital then I think it
00:44:17
brings up the point about X Apple people
00:44:19
that there's a degree of confidence
00:44:21
because people come from apple and a
00:44:24
degree of hubris in the employees that
00:44:25
come from Apple that says I have worked
00:44:28
at the best hardware company in the
00:44:30
world therefore this person is likely to
00:44:31
succeed it turns out that when you don't
00:44:33
have all that built-in infrastructure
00:44:35
for testing and optimization all of that
00:44:37
built-in distribution all of the
00:44:39
feedback systems that Apple has
00:44:41
engineered into their business model for
00:44:43
so long maybe you missed some of the
00:44:44
data around what makes a product great
00:44:46
or not before you launch I think that's
00:44:48
your key point freeberg that is the best
00:44:50
point is these folks come from Apple
00:44:53
they're used to unlimited
00:44:54
resources and what you don't see is all
00:44:57
the product Apple doesn't release right
00:44:59
they never release their car correct
00:45:01
freedberg and and they get to well I
00:45:02
think I think then there's also this
00:45:04
question about like where is the value
00:45:06
in the product because they thought hey
00:45:09
if we have ai on a pin it'll work
00:45:12
without the consumer feedback about
00:45:14
whether or not people are willing to sit
00:45:15
around and wait for 12 seconds to get an
00:45:18
answer to a question and then it it
00:45:20
brings up the risk this other really
00:45:21
important point which is half the people
00:45:23
in Silicon Valley are running
00:45:24
breathlessly into the conversation
00:45:26
saying do not disparage a startup that's
00:45:28
working really hard at getting their
00:45:30
first product right it'll destroy the
00:45:32
motivation of other startups that need
00:45:33
to kind of iterate to get there um and
00:45:36
we can't just take the first V1 and say
00:45:39
that's it Jam your thoughts you're
00:45:41
laughing hysterical at this then the the
00:45:43
other half of Silicon Valley are running
00:45:44
in and saying this thing's a piece of
00:45:46
what are you talking about it
00:45:47
doesn't work so it is a really
00:45:49
interesting kind of you know debate yeah
00:45:52
Ro shock test on what's going on what do
00:45:55
you see in this ink blot of a product
00:45:58
neither of those two cohorts I think
00:46:00
that incredibly motivated dedicated
00:46:04
entrepreneurs don't even know that this
00:46:06
is happening and don't care got it in
00:46:09
other words the reviewers uh are going
00:46:11
to review products and you just got to
00:46:13
plow ahead and make a better product the
00:46:15
idea that in 2009 10 or 11 right
00:46:20
that when all the Rockets weren't
00:46:22
working you know and Elon was back
00:46:24
against the wall that he was reading
00:46:27
Tech crunch or yeah getting upset
00:46:29
because a product failed some other
00:46:31
random product that had nothing to do
00:46:33
with his I think is laughable I think no
00:46:35
great entrepreneur cares I don't think
00:46:37
freeberg is g to change what's happening
00:46:40
at oh Hollow based on what is this thing
00:46:44
called Humane right freeberg have you
00:46:47
changed have you made decisions are you
00:46:48
sadder today in ohala when you walked
00:46:50
into the office to manage your team okay
00:46:52
so there you go there's your answer
00:46:54
matters your feeling on this yeah I mean
00:46:56
I'm having a hard understanding all the
00:46:58
controversies this week I mean reviewers
00:47:00
are going to review protesters are going
00:47:02
to protest and NPR presidents are going
00:47:03
to NPR here we go yeah what's going on
00:47:07
everyone's just doing everyone's doing
00:47:09
their job yeah here's an idea for the
00:47:11
Humane team be thankful somebody took
00:47:13
the time to review your product and give
00:47:15
you candid feedback and incorporate it
00:47:17
back into your product and make it work
00:47:20
and irreverent elitists will eat octopus
00:47:23
here we are absolutely oh so delicious
00:47:25
so delicious high IQ Foods we create a
00:47:27
new category high IQ Foods yeah what are
00:47:29
the other high IQ foodsweet acorn fed
00:47:33
beef yes for sure high IQ pigs very high
00:47:37
IQ I saw that cow playing chess before
00:47:39
he was served for dinner actually I was
00:47:43
having a p pork sandwich from bies and
00:47:46
uh it helped me solve Wordle for the day
00:47:48
before I ate it so I got Wordle in two
00:47:52
tries oh I'm so sorry that one landed
00:47:56
want that wi to
00:47:59
land yeah I mean okay let me ask this
00:48:02
question do we think the world let's say
00:48:04
this thing did respond here's the theme
00:48:06
here's the theme Jason here's the theme
00:48:08
Jason the problem is that I think people
00:48:11
right now the real Roar Shack test is if
00:48:14
you are so easily distracted you
00:48:16
probably don't have enough to do right
00:48:19
that's the entitlement is that you don't
00:48:21
have enough work on I don't want to call
00:48:22
it I don't want to call it entitlement
00:48:23
but I think the reality is that if you
00:48:25
get caught up in all of these silly
00:48:28
little fake battles or decisions I think
00:48:31
what it really means is that you're not
00:48:33
busy enough and or you're not working on
00:48:35
something that matters enough to you
00:48:36
because when either of those two things
00:48:38
are true people tend to be tend to have
00:48:41
blinders on and they are super focused
00:48:43
and they just don't have an opinion they
00:48:45
don't care like honestly many of these
00:48:47
topics today I really don't care and
00:48:49
it's not because I'm better or worse or
00:48:51
smarter or Dumber it's because I'm so
00:48:52
overworked right now I don't have time
00:48:54
to have an opinion on this stuff got a
00:48:57
CEO job and now he's got to work no but
00:48:59
and I think that anybody else trying to
00:49:00
do their job well is probably in the
00:49:02
same category H I hadn't even heard of
00:49:05
this reviewer what's his name mar mar
00:49:07
mar Marquez brownz Brown I never heard
00:49:11
if you're on YouTube he's kind of like
00:49:12
the new Walt Mossberg he he does 20 30
00:49:16
minute videos they get millions of views
00:49:19
he's huge I don't know that he makes or
00:49:21
breaks a product though by the way he
00:49:23
does not make or break a product the
00:49:24
product makes or breaks itself yeah look
00:49:26
when when I was running companies I
00:49:28
wouldn't care about what One reviewer
00:49:30
said I would care about the totality of
00:49:32
the reaction to the product which would
00:49:34
include customers as well as reviewers
00:49:37
and so forth so I don't think there's
00:49:39
any point getting too bad out of shape
00:49:41
out one review I think what's kind of
00:49:43
happening in terms of the reaction here
00:49:45
is that people want to give this company
00:49:49
like Mercy points for being Innovative
00:49:52
so my guess is the product just isn't
00:49:53
ready for prime time but everyone wants
00:49:55
to kind of like they want their
00:49:57
reviewers to take it easy on them or
00:49:58
something because they are being
00:50:00
Innovative and they're breaking new
00:50:02
ground in this this area of wearables
00:50:04
but the reality is in the real world
00:50:07
where you want to charge people for your
00:50:09
product like customers don't have mercy
00:50:11
points nope so if the car breaks down
00:50:15
the car breaks down and by the way
00:50:16
Marquez got a little bit of heat just a
00:50:18
month ago because he reviewed the Fisker
00:50:21
the Fisker is just a piece of garbage
00:50:22
car and he said it's the worst car he's
00:50:24
ever reviewed and you know what
00:50:26
reviewers exist in the world to inform
00:50:29
customers about what products and
00:50:31
services they should buy and then they
00:50:32
should inform you to make a better
00:50:34
product period full stop there is an
00:50:36
easy solution to this by the way which
00:50:38
Apple did they they released the Vision
00:50:41
Pro as a developer kit they put a bunch
00:50:44
of caveats on it and said hey we
00:50:46
understand this is high priced it's a
00:50:48
developer kit this is in beta what
00:50:50
Humane should have done is they should
00:50:52
have said this is the Humane beta for
00:50:54
developers I still don't know what it is
00:50:56
what what is this okay it's a wearable
00:50:58
it's a square it has a projector on it
00:51:01
you put your hand out it projects a
00:51:03
little screen that shows you uh like a
00:51:05
computer screen and you can talk to it
00:51:07
Prim yeah the primary function is like a
00:51:10
chat AI assistant that sits on you and
00:51:13
has a camera yeah and so you can it's
00:51:16
taping everything that it sees it
00:51:18
doesn't do that by default but it could
00:51:20
but sorry let me let me just give a
00:51:22
quick overview and basically you ask it
00:51:23
questions and it can go get the answers
00:51:26
the problem is is that it has to go make
00:51:28
a request to the Internet run an AI
00:51:30
model and come back so it takes like 12
00:51:32
seconds to get results most of the time
00:51:35
according to the reviewer the results
00:51:36
are actually wrong because it's
00:51:38
hallucinating models The Voice to Text
00:51:40
translation is wrong there's a lot of
00:51:42
things that are wrong about it so it
00:51:43
takes a long time it's clunky and then
00:51:45
the battery burns out every two hours
00:51:47
and it gets super hot because of the way
00:51:49
they get it to magnetically stick to
00:51:50
your clothes so it gets very hot so
00:51:52
there's all sort of issue and it's 700
00:51:54
bucks other than that how was to play
00:51:57
Mrs Lincoln and by the way most
00:51:59
importantly to you chth it will screw up
00:52:01
your Fabrics if you wear this with a
00:52:02
Laura Piana sweater it's going to drag
00:52:04
your sweater down you would never attach
00:52:07
it to a $6,000
00:52:08
sweater yeah it's basically what you're
00:52:10
telling me is it's an overpriced device
00:52:13
that could give you first-degree Burns
00:52:16
and it will ruin your it doesn't answer
00:52:18
the questions that you ask Bas but then
00:52:21
do I think the questions or do I have to
00:52:23
say it out loud so it looks like I'm
00:52:24
talking to myself you look like aun yes
00:52:27
you're walking around like a crazy
00:52:28
person talking that was the other thing
00:52:30
he said is like when you're in a crowd
00:52:31
and there's voice around you can use
00:52:33
your hand hand gestures to control it
00:52:35
and do things with the projector thing
00:52:37
that it does some really it's some
00:52:39
really cool interesting features it's
00:52:41
just like it's not quite there yet who
00:52:42
invested in it let's not make fun of it
00:52:44
let's make fun of the investors who who
00:52:46
invested Sam mman shout out to Sam's
00:52:49
coming on the program I
00:52:51
think uh yeah I listen I I the concept I
00:52:54
think is good wearables are going to
00:52:56
provide some distinct value when they
00:52:58
work because you don't have to take your
00:53:00
phone out and so the idea behind
00:53:02
wearables like your watch is you know
00:53:05
like there are some things I do on my
00:53:06
watch now where I don't take my phone
00:53:08
out I have I'll take the other side of
00:53:10
this I'll take the other side when
00:53:11
you're done yeah yeah I use Fitbit
00:53:13
company we invested in and it puts all
00:53:15
my workouts on my watch when I'm doing
00:53:17
weights I started doing weights now
00:53:18
that's why I look so buff folks
00:53:20
subscribe to the YouTube channel to see
00:53:22
and I do my sets and I log them all with
00:53:24
my my watch I don't have to take my out
00:53:26
that's like the first thing and then
00:53:28
when I'm skiing I can see each run I
00:53:30
showed you slopes I'm not an investor in
00:53:32
chth where I can see my speed and all
00:53:34
that you're saying something totally
00:53:35
different that's that's utility of
00:53:37
course you'll find a device will give
00:53:39
you utility I I thought you were saying
00:53:41
something else which is everybody's
00:53:42
going to have wearables and I want to
00:53:44
take the exact opposite side yeah I
00:53:47
don't know that everybody will have
00:53:48
wearables but I do find a couple of
00:53:50
little things that work for me I totally
00:53:52
get that you know the use of an
00:53:53
accelerometer or whatever in a watch or
00:53:55
in a band that you wear on your wrist
00:53:57
for a workout and I think that that's
00:53:59
valuable or heart rate a glycemic
00:54:02
monitor so that you could all of that
00:54:03
stuff Mak super sense for you as an
00:54:05
individual but that's not an experience
00:54:08
where you're engaging with it
00:54:11
to sub like to replace some other social
00:54:14
interaction that's just you getting
00:54:15
utility as you live your life what I'm
00:54:17
saying is the idea that you start to
00:54:19
rely on a device as your interface into
00:54:22
the world I would take the exact other
00:54:25
side of the BET which is I think that
00:54:26
humans are getting so sick and tired of
00:54:31
being of only communicating in these
00:54:34
very rigid ways like I'm telling you
00:54:36
like if you look at our children's
00:54:38
generation they don't know how to make
00:54:40
eye contact they don't know how to talk
00:54:42
and I think it's going to come back and
00:54:43
bite them in the ass and so I think the
00:54:45
pendulum is going to swing in the other
00:54:47
direction where it's like okay enough of
00:54:49
this stuff let's actually look each
00:54:51
other in the eye and talk to each other
00:54:53
the way that humans were meant to be and
00:54:54
I and I think that in that devices like
00:54:57
a glucose monitor or a band has value
00:55:00
but I don't think it's going to be this
00:55:01
interface where you're sign languaging
00:55:03
it while you're at Coachella I think
00:55:05
you're gonna rip the devices off and
00:55:06
actually be a Coachella without any
00:55:08
devices did any of you guys read
00:55:09
Jonathan haes book anxious generation it
00:55:12
is unbelievably awesome it touches not
00:55:14
right yet yet I stop what you're doing
00:55:16
and just listen to the audio book on
00:55:18
your walks on Audible this book is super
00:55:20
important and awesome the anxious
00:55:22
Generation by Jonathan ha I cannot tell
00:55:24
you how important it is saxs any closing
00:55:27
feelings here you have a take any hot
00:55:28
takes well I I would slightly disagree
00:55:31
with you guys about this device so so
00:55:34
first of all I think that humans are
00:55:35
becoming more and more cybernetic we're
00:55:37
getting more and more immersed with
00:55:39
computing power and I agree it creates
00:55:41
this anxiety and all these problems but
00:55:42
on the other hand I think it's an
00:55:44
irreversible Trend so I think that I
00:55:46
would not bet against things that make
00:55:48
us more cybernetic I think the problem
00:55:50
here is that this company is trying to
00:55:52
do two difficult things the first thing
00:55:55
is it's trying to capture everything
00:55:57
that's happening in the world around you
00:55:58
to feed it into an AI model so it can
00:56:00
make you smarter the other thing is
00:56:02
trying to do is reduce your dependence
00:56:04
on your phone by creating this new
00:56:07
projection surface and you know in my
00:56:10
experience when you try to do two hard
00:56:12
things you actually Square the
00:56:14
complexity and you square the difficulty
00:56:16
as opposed to adding it yes so I think
00:56:18
of these two things the one that sounds
00:56:20
interesting to me is taking in all the
00:56:22
information from the physical world and
00:56:24
putting in an AI model that can be
00:56:25
helpful to you you but I see no reason
00:56:27
to replace the phone I think it should
00:56:29
just work with your phone the problem
00:56:31
they're going to have is that that
00:56:32
pendant will compete with the Apple
00:56:35
glasses and all the other wearables that
00:56:38
are going to be created to you know suck
00:56:39
in all this information this computer
00:56:42
vision from the world nonetheless I do
00:56:45
think that is the opportunity it's not
00:56:46
replacing the phone it's layering a new
00:56:49
platform on top of the phone that can
00:56:51
kind of you know again give you that
00:56:53
Terminator mode in the real world and
00:56:56
that was a complaint about this device
00:56:57
specifically was that it was detached
00:56:59
from the phone I understand why they
00:57:00
want to make it Standalone but and then
00:57:03
this opens up all the Privacy let me ask
00:57:05
the panel here what do you think about
00:57:08
this concept of recording the entire
00:57:09
world all these conversations and video
00:57:12
with these devices I think it's a quick
00:57:13
way to get yourself punched in the face
00:57:15
I mean we saw that with Google Glass
00:57:17
people showed up at bars in San
00:57:19
Francisco and parties with these Google
00:57:20
Glass things on and literally got
00:57:22
punched in the face well this has got
00:57:24
massive privacy things recording
00:57:27
with a pant thank this is why I said
00:57:29
what I said I do think sax is right that
00:57:31
ultimately you'll have some kind of
00:57:33
brain interface because I do think a
00:57:36
chip implant of some kind is very
00:57:38
valuable but what I'm also saying is
00:57:40
that I think that that will actually
00:57:42
lessen the social acceptability of these
00:57:46
visible devices that are constantly
00:57:48
getting in between you and another
00:57:50
person and so the idea that we're kind
00:57:52
of already in a quasy surveillance State
00:57:54
and now we're going to increase that by
00:57:57
n factorial to the number of people I
00:58:00
think is very depressing it is
00:58:02
depressing and you know what in Jonathan
00:58:03
hates book he uh talks about phone
00:58:06
lockers for schools and the
00:58:08
transformative power they have had when
00:58:09
you go to a school there are some
00:58:11
schools now high schools where the
00:58:13
students put their phones in specific
00:58:15
lockers they do it they do it in my kids
00:58:16
it's it's actually Jason these special
00:58:19
pouches pouches yeah those are the
00:58:21
pouches comedians use like Chappelle at
00:58:23
his shows Chappelle use it Kevin uses
00:58:25
them yeah exactly and they're
00:58:27
great and then what what the school now
00:58:30
also teaches the kids at least our
00:58:31
school which I found really interesting
00:58:33
is the graduated form of that is they
00:58:35
actually now allow you to put it in a
00:58:38
envelope because they're training the
00:58:40
kid like the pouch you can't get access
00:58:42
to you have to go back to it locks
00:58:44
unlock device yeah and then I I saw that
00:58:47
my son last week had it actually in a in
00:58:49
a white envelope and he had to close the
00:58:51
envelope and just keep it with him as as
00:58:53
like a way of graduating from the form
00:58:56
of keeping the phone away to like you
00:58:58
know having it in your pocket so the
00:59:00
schools are trying to do a lot to try to
00:59:01
teach these kids not to be so dependent
00:59:03
on they should ban these devices at
00:59:04
schools 100% And then at the poker game
00:59:06
tonight we should make people stack
00:59:08
their phones and charge somebody a
00:59:09
thousand dollar whoever takes the phone
00:59:10
first I AG with that let's do it tonight
00:59:13
let me let me give a a shout out to one
00:59:15
of my favorite sci-fi book series is
00:59:17
called Nexus by romez Nom and it's kind
00:59:19
of this like
00:59:20
cyberpunk futuristic series but what he
00:59:23
talks about is it when we have this
00:59:25
brain computer interface you'll be able
00:59:27
to upload your memories and so you know
00:59:30
you talk about this idea of recording
00:59:32
your whole life through a pendant well
00:59:33
eventually You' be able to record your
00:59:35
whole life based on just through your
00:59:37
eyeballs and you know you'd be able to
00:59:40
upload in theory a firstperson view of
00:59:44
whatever conversation you've been in you
00:59:46
know and so there's a certain you look
00:59:48
this is pretty far off but there is
00:59:50
maybe a certain inevitability to that
00:59:53
and um we're going to have to figure out
00:59:54
how to deal with the Privacy
00:59:55
implications Black Mirror episode on
00:59:57
this exact idea yep yeah you have the
00:59:59
DVR of your entire life yeah and it is
01:00:02
gnarly to think these things will exist
01:00:04
and I think humanity is going to have to
01:00:05
make a decision I think to fight this or
01:00:07
embrace it I I think we should fight it
01:00:09
I think it's going to ruin uh like
01:00:11
social and existence and it's already
01:00:13
ruined poker Games Etc when everybody's
01:00:15
on their phone it's ruined dinner
01:00:16
parties when everybody's on their phones
01:00:18
the constant distraction is just
01:00:20
horrific and it's having a horrible
01:00:22
impact on this generation I'll double
01:00:23
down on what you're saying it is so
01:00:25
lovely to be ble to have a dinner where
01:00:26
everybody just talks to each other and
01:00:28
looks each other in the eyes yes and
01:00:30
then when you have a handful of people
01:00:31
always on their phone it's depressing
01:00:35
it's actually it's actually not even
01:00:36
neutral it's a net negative and a drag
01:00:39
on the entire night absolutely I I I am
01:00:42
trying to come up with ways to remove
01:00:44
these devices from the social settings
01:00:46
I'm in I've been to a couple of parties
01:00:47
with high-profile people where they have
01:00:49
everybody check their phones at the
01:00:51
Valle and the door I got to say those
01:00:53
are the best nights of my life those are
01:00:54
the best nights yeah they're incredible
01:00:56
and you know no offense to people who
01:00:57
are addicted to their phones I I am to a
01:00:59
certain extent I put my social media at
01:01:01
1 hour on my phone my Lord it is hard to
01:01:04
do less than an hour of social media in
01:01:06
our job positions and you know I deleted
01:01:10
Tik Tok about a month
01:01:11
ago it's been liberating I was a slave
01:01:15
to that app I couldn't believe how much
01:01:17
how much Tik Tok I was consuming after
01:01:20
it was gone because I couldn't I
01:01:21
couldn't find anything to replace it and
01:01:24
then I stumbled into the fact that
01:01:25
YouTube has YouTube shorts and there is
01:01:27
a lot of that content but it's terrible
01:01:29
and the algorithm is really bad yeah
01:01:31
sucks and so fortunately I just stopped
01:01:33
using YouTube it just shows you how the
01:01:36
algorithm is such a key component of
01:01:38
that Tik Tock experience because I had
01:01:40
the same experience shorts serves up
01:01:43
garbage garbage Instagram show serves up
01:01:46
garbage and then Tik Tok is just like
01:01:48
right into your brain kicks ass it kicks
01:01:52
ass by the way I'm G give another shout
01:01:53
I miss Tik Tok Tik Tok I miss you yeah
01:01:56
whatever it's that's going away I miss
01:01:57
you another Incredible Book I think we
01:01:59
should book this speaker for Allin
01:02:01
Summit bad therapy why the kids aren't
01:02:04
growing up Abigail shrier this book is
01:02:08
incredible and if you read these two
01:02:10
book every parent read these two books
01:02:13
and we need to have a conversation on it
01:02:14
as parents here everybody read these two
01:02:16
books these two these are my two top
01:02:18
choices for the all in Summit I think
01:02:20
it's like the going to be the the topic
01:02:22
of our time all right let's keep going
01:02:24
down this incredible pocket very
01:02:26
important issue for us to talk about
01:02:28
Silicon Valley startups having a bit of
01:02:30
a R&D tax problem thanks for putting it
01:02:33
on the docket here freeberg it's a bit
01:02:35
inside baseball but very important topic
01:02:38
let's say company like acne Corporation
01:02:40
generated a million bucks in revenue and
01:02:42
they spent a million bucks on their
01:02:43
software developers last year let's say
01:02:45
they had I don't know five developers
01:02:46
getting paid 200 Grand each well
01:02:48
traditionally this company would pay
01:02:49
nothing in income tax right they spent a
01:02:51
million they deduct that million from
01:02:53
the million dollars in Revenue that came
01:02:55
in and everything's good but due to the
01:02:59
tax cuts and jobs Act of
01:03:02
2017 starting last year a provision
01:03:04
kicked in forcing companies to advertise
01:03:06
their R&D expense over five years so in
01:03:09
this hypothetical situation the Acme
01:03:11
Corporation would advertise 200k a year
01:03:14
and pay income tax on the 800k in
01:03:16
profits this is brutal obviously St
01:03:19
quotes profits air quotes air quotes
01:03:21
profits correct yeah uh and this is
01:03:23
absolutely
01:03:24
brutal and a lot of companies took a
01:03:26
wency approaches hoping Congress would
01:03:28
fix the issue in January a bipartisan
01:03:30
tax bill that would reverse his changes
01:03:32
passed in the house but the bill has
01:03:34
stalled in the Senate and we got to get
01:03:36
this thing fixed because it's going to
01:03:37
sync a lot of startups maybe people will
01:03:39
start putting their companies in other
01:03:42
countries but uh it's attached to this
01:03:44
child tax credit which Republicans don't
01:03:46
want to pass so of no reversal has
01:03:48
happened freeberg you highlighted this
01:03:50
for us very important topic thank you
01:03:51
for doing
01:03:52
so as uh our great
01:03:57
contributor here what are your thoughts
01:03:58
on it this became law in the 2017 jobs
01:04:02
act as you
01:04:03
highlighted and basically it means that
01:04:06
companies not just like tech companies
01:04:08
but life sciences companies defense
01:04:11
companies are pushing Congress to change
01:04:13
this law because you can't actually
01:04:16
deduct the expenses that you use to run
01:04:19
your business you have to only deduct
01:04:21
them over five years 20% a year so like
01:04:24
you pointed out if you're making a a
01:04:25
million dollars but you're spending a
01:04:27
million dollars you made no profit but
01:04:28
you got to pay taxes as if you made 800
01:04:30
Grand in profit and a lot of these small
01:04:33
companies don't have that cash so
01:04:35
Venture Capital back companies and
01:04:37
public companies that are profitable
01:04:39
they can afford to do this because they
01:04:40
have large balance sheets so it doesn't
01:04:41
affect them as much as it does the
01:04:44
literally hundreds of thousands of small
01:04:47
businesses that work in the Life
01:04:48
Sciences sector the defense sector the
01:04:50
tech sector that are struggling this
01:04:52
year to make the tax payments that are
01:04:55
required
01:04:56
under this this law that went into
01:04:58
effect last year and Congress promised
01:05:00
that they were going to repeal this law
01:05:02
leading up to April 15th which happened
01:05:04
obviously a few days ago um and make it
01:05:06
retroactive to 2023 but they didn't but
01:05:09
freeberg they know basic math Congress
01:05:11
knows basic math how do they how do they
01:05:14
what do
01:05:15
they yeah so the the original intent was
01:05:18
that this was one of the ways you guys
01:05:20
know whenever you pass a bill it gets
01:05:22
run through the OM and the CBO that
01:05:24
figures out what's the budgetary cost of
01:05:26
the bill yeah and one of the ways that
01:05:28
they made this work this bill the 2017
01:05:31
Trump tax and jobs act you guys may
01:05:32
remember in that bill they also made it
01:05:34
impossible to deduct entertainment and
01:05:37
dining expenses when you take people out
01:05:38
to dinner anymore that sucks and they
01:05:40
did all those things to make up some of
01:05:41
the money they were using for basic
01:05:44
general tax breaks for companies so they
01:05:47
Ed this as a way to say like look in a
01:05:48
couple of years we're going to kick in
01:05:50
this R&D expenditure thing and it'll
01:05:52
trigger a lot more revenue for the
01:05:54
federal government it'll create a lot
01:05:55
more taxes and a lot more Revenue so
01:05:57
that was the idea and everyone was like
01:05:59
yeah okay sure we'll do that great it
01:06:01
makes the accounting work and then in a
01:06:02
couple years you know nudge nudge wink
01:06:04
wink we're going to come back and repeal
01:06:05
it except Congress has stalled out
01:06:08
there's this ineptitude where anytime
01:06:10
someone tries to pass a bill in Congress
01:06:12
someone else says I want to get money
01:06:15
and so the Democrats showed up and said
01:06:16
we want this child tax credit thing to
01:06:18
show up which
01:06:20
basically was passed during Co and they
01:06:24
want to extend it going for and the
01:06:26
child tax credit says that you can get a
01:06:28
check for 1,800 a year in 2023 1900 in
01:06:32
2024 and $2,000 in 2025 for having for
01:06:35
each child you have and the Republicans
01:06:37
in the Senate are saying wait a second
01:06:39
for people to get this thing we want to
01:06:41
make sure they're working we want to
01:06:42
make sure it's not as retroactive so now
01:06:44
there's this big debate about how big
01:06:45
the child tax credit should be and
01:06:47
that's keeping this R&D thing from going
01:06:50
through and meanwhile I've gotten tons
01:06:52
of emails from CEOs of tech companies
01:06:54
that are breaking these are not tech
01:06:56
companies that are making a ton of
01:06:57
profit they're not public they're not
01:06:59
Venture backed they're just people
01:07:00
running running their their business and
01:07:03
now they're gonna have this huge tax
01:07:05
bill even though they didn't make any
01:07:06
money this year and it's crippling
01:07:08
businesses around the country and
01:07:10
need they're going to write a check
01:07:12
they're going to borrow money they're
01:07:13
going to go to the bank borrow money or
01:07:15
they're going to incur penalties with
01:07:16
the IRS because they don't have the cash
01:07:17
to pay the the tax bill because they
01:07:19
don't have any profit they didn't make
01:07:20
any money if they just ran the business
01:07:22
Break Even which a lot of these
01:07:23
companies do is just make a little bit
01:07:25
of money break even and then they've got
01:07:27
this huge tax bill and profits they
01:07:28
didn't actually have they got to go
01:07:30
figure out how to write a check and also
01:07:31
how do you define R&D I was talking to
01:07:33
an accountant he's like yeah I don't
01:07:34
know if that's R&D I'm like you don't
01:07:35
know it's R&D like okay so if I make
01:07:38
some piece of software yeah yeah there's
01:07:40
all this writing in the um if you get
01:07:43
audited by the IRS they have the ability
01:07:46
to basically capture everything so like
01:07:47
let's say you're a mobile app developer
01:07:50
and you make a million dollars a year
01:07:51
but you spend a million dollars a year
01:07:53
on your developers okay they're going to
01:07:56
count that they have the the ability to
01:07:57
count that as an R&D so that the
01:07:59
accountants the tax accountants tell you
01:08:01
book it all as R&D because otherwise you
01:08:02
could get audited and actually get in
01:08:04
trouble because anything that involves
01:08:05
the development of Technology now is
01:08:07
considered R&D again a company working
01:08:10
in life sciences as a research company
01:08:12
doing lab work can but I do bug fixes is
01:08:15
a bug fix R&D if I make a new feature in
01:08:18
application this year does it have to be
01:08:20
advertised over five years if I put a
01:08:22
new filter I'm not a tax my
01:08:24
understanding is most of the stuff is
01:08:26
getting captured and that's why it's
01:08:27
hurting everything from defense to to to
01:08:29
Life Sciences to lab equipment to
01:08:32
startups that software to everything and
01:08:35
Congress can't get out of its own way
01:08:37
where this this bill passed by the way
01:08:39
bipartisan in the house then it went to
01:08:41
the Senate and now it's getting taken
01:08:43
apart in the Senate and now it's stalled
01:08:44
out and everyone's freaking out that
01:08:45
it's stalled out past April 15th and
01:08:48
it's actually going to hurt a lot of
01:08:49
small businesses in this country and
01:08:51
here's the other problem is it actually
01:08:54
limits our ability to invest in
01:08:55
innovation in this country because now
01:08:57
you're better off there's no other
01:08:59
country in the world that does this
01:09:00
every other country in the world tries
01:09:02
to incentivize investment in Innovation
01:09:04
and here in the US we're basically
01:09:06
saying no we're going to tax you for
01:09:09
investing in technology development and
01:09:11
Innovation and the other thing that's
01:09:13
that's actually not being talked about
01:09:15
is even in this bill where they're
01:09:17
repealing this they're leaving in the
01:09:20
fact that if you invest in R&D outside
01:09:22
the US you have to amortise it over 50
01:09:25
years so let's say that you're a US
01:09:27
developer and you hire people offshore
01:09:30
yeah you got to basically amortise the
01:09:32
offshore stuff over 15 years which means
01:09:34
you'll never make a profit you're always
01:09:36
gonna have to pay taxes how we're trying
01:09:38
to kill innovation in this country and
01:09:40
the two things they got to solve is this
01:09:42
one and then m&a we got to have a better
01:09:46
solution for allowing companies to be
01:09:49
bought and sold in this or or merge in
01:09:51
this country these two things are
01:09:53
putting a lot of headwind
01:09:56
on the startup ecosystem and on the
01:09:58
Venture and the risk-taking capital
01:10:00
ecosystems if you're
01:10:02
in Washington DC you're involved in our
01:10:05
government please solve these two issues
01:10:07
you got to figure out a way to allow
01:10:09
companies to be bought and sold you got
01:10:11
to figure out
01:10:12
away to to fix this tax issue or else
01:10:15
we're going to kill a lot of startups
01:10:17
and these are the companies that pay a
01:10:19
lot of taxes and these are the capital
01:10:21
gains that fund a lot of state's
01:10:23
treasuries it's also it also an
01:10:25
illustration of just how hungry we are
01:10:27
for tax revenue in this country you know
01:10:30
it's only going to grow and I'm not
01:10:31
sitting here complaining about taxes you
01:10:33
know the Trump tax cut that he put in
01:10:35
place in 2017 added one and a half
01:10:37
trillion dollars to the federal deficit
01:10:40
so tax cuts in general are not great
01:10:42
when you're spending a lot but it does
01:10:44
highlight just how much we are spending
01:10:45
at the federal level and the demand for
01:10:48
tax revenue and that demand causes this
01:10:51
counter cyclical problem which is now
01:10:52
we're going to eat into Innovation which
01:10:54
is supposed to drive get us out of the
01:10:56
problem the spiral that that results
01:10:58
from this debt so it really highlights
01:11:01
like just the challenges that are going
01:11:02
to emerge particularly in the decade
01:11:04
ahead because we have all of the
01:11:05
spending that's coming in front of us
01:11:07
over the next decade and how we're going
01:11:08
to start to demand more and more tax in
01:11:10
all these weird ways that can really
01:11:12
hurt industry unintended consequences
01:11:15
are very
01:11:16
real shath you were gonna say something
01:11:19
well doesn't it mean though that if you
01:11:20
run it at break even and without a lot
01:11:24
of growth by year five you'll be back to
01:11:26
where you were so you really have to
01:11:27
cover the taxes in years one through
01:11:30
four that's right if the business but if
01:11:32
the business is growing you're always
01:11:33
going to be in a
01:11:34
hole right right so if your revenue is
01:11:37
growing and your Opex is growing you're
01:11:39
always going to be in a hole I think
01:11:40
Jason mentioned it earlier and I think
01:11:42
it's the key thing which is what is R&D
01:11:44
then yeah and maybe you just move things
01:11:47
to cogs and just be done with it I
01:11:51
remember businesses and and you guys
01:11:53
know this like when you look at a public
01:11:54
company's financials what you're seeing
01:11:56
is their Gap financials generally
01:11:58
accepted accounting principles and
01:12:01
that's the way that you present the
01:12:02
financials of a business that's
01:12:04
different than the way you present
01:12:05
financials to the IRS you don't have a
01:12:07
lot of discretion in your tax financials
01:12:10
your tax financials are actually quite
01:12:12
different than your Gap financials yes
01:12:14
so when you file your taxes there's a
01:12:16
lot of rules on what you are allowed to
01:12:18
deduct and aren't allow to deduct that's
01:12:19
quite different than how you present
01:12:21
your corporate financials to investors
01:12:23
and that's really where people get
01:12:24
screwed is you don't have that sort of
01:12:25
discretion that you do in kind of
01:12:28
sharing your financials with investors
01:12:30
so this is not Financial or accounting
01:12:32
advice get great representation I just
01:12:34
hope Congress resolves this because it's
01:12:35
you know yes super important all right
01:12:37
sports betting has gone mainstream if
01:12:39
you don't know two out of three College
01:12:41
have placed a bet in the last year since
01:12:44
the Supreme Court struck down the
01:12:46
amateur sports protection act 38 states
01:12:48
have legalize sports betting I think
01:12:50
that's a great thing but we're starting
01:12:52
to see some weird Behavior because of it
01:12:54
t of sites like DraftKings FanDuel ESPN
01:12:58
bet b MGM all of these have broken out
01:13:01
but this week we started to see some
01:13:03
weird Behavior the NBA banned a 24y old
01:13:06
player jonte Porter for life after a
01:13:10
scandal this one is bizarre an
01:13:13
interesting Porter was Bench player for
01:13:15
the Toronto Raptors averaging about 14
01:13:17
minutes per game it's important on these
01:13:20
gambling apps you can do all kinds of
01:13:21
prop bets for those of you who don't
01:13:23
know prop bets could be things like like
01:13:25
uh Steph is going to hit five threes in
01:13:28
a game or LeBron's going to score under
01:13:30
30 points you're just betting on unique
01:13:32
things that could happen and then you
01:13:33
can parlay them together you can put
01:13:35
multiple bets together and it
01:13:36
automatically gives you a price and you
01:13:39
can do really you know deep Wagers doing
01:13:43
this the NBA found out that Porto was
01:13:45
telling people to bet his unders for
01:13:48
points and rebounds During certain games
01:13:50
during those games he'd play a few
01:13:51
minutes then check him out s out of the
01:13:54
game Within illness quote unquote
01:13:57
technically the bet would still count
01:13:58
since he played the game but everybody
01:14:00
who bet his unders would win normally
01:14:02
nobody would notice this of course
01:14:04
because he doesn't play that much he's a
01:14:05
bench player but DraftKings because they
01:14:08
have all the
01:14:09
data tipped everyone off because Porter
01:14:14
was the biggest money maker on March
01:14:16
20th this led to an NBA investigation
01:14:18
Draft Kings will give you a leaderboard
01:14:20
of the biggest bets and they saw that
01:14:22
somebody placed an $80,000 bet that
01:14:24
Porter would hit the on a bunch of
01:14:25
different categories crazy outlier bet
01:14:28
DraftKings canceled the bet the NBA
01:14:31
found that Porter separately placed
01:14:32
dozens of bets on NBA games using his
01:14:35
friends accounts winning a whopping
01:14:38
$222,000 and this idiot now is banned
01:14:41
for life from the NBA allegedly
01:14:43
allegedly allegedly but obviously the
01:14:47
NBA has the receipts with DraftKings
01:14:50
chath you owned a NBA team for a little
01:14:53
while and you watched as David
01:14:55
for aade you watch as David Stern who
01:14:57
was absolutely opposed to gambling and
01:15:02
then Adam Sil embraced it tell us from
01:15:04
your front row seat your thoughts on
01:15:06
wagering in the
01:15:08
NBA and wagering RIT
01:15:10
large okay
01:15:13
look I remember
01:15:17
when I joined the ownership group of the
01:15:19
Warriors I had to file this enormous
01:15:22
document and one of the things that they
01:15:24
really into is whether you've bet
01:15:28
before and they make it really really
01:15:31
clear that it is completely not allowed
01:15:35
to bet and the only way that you can bet
01:15:38
is if you're betting on non-basketball
01:15:39
and if you are in Vegas and you go to a
01:15:41
casino and a troop sports book that's
01:15:43
the only time it's tolerated the thing
01:15:46
with all of these sites FanDuel and
01:15:48
DraftKings is they did deals with the
01:15:51
leagues where part of the feature is
01:15:53
that when there really crazy asymmetric
01:15:56
betting on something that's obscure they
01:15:59
report it back to the leagues so the
01:16:01
leagues know how to look at it because
01:16:02
typically what happens is if you're
01:16:04
talking like a very well-contested
01:16:07
basketball Jason you have a relatively
01:16:10
balanced book right and what the the
01:16:13
goal is is to figure out where are the
01:16:14
sharps betting meaning the really smart
01:16:16
money guys and everybody else is a
01:16:18
square and most of retail is a square
01:16:20
okay they're going to lose their money
01:16:22
and so the goal is to always find out
01:16:23
where the sharps are going but there are
01:16:25
some of these bets and in this case this
01:16:27
is why they found out when you have
01:16:29
something being bet that's very obscure
01:16:31
in size these apps immediately go back
01:16:35
to the league and say this just happened
01:16:37
so compare that to chth what would
01:16:40
happen previously before sports betting
01:16:42
was legal in the US before what would
01:16:44
happen is like all of these bookies
01:16:47
would be able to have relationships with
01:16:49
some of these players sometimes they
01:16:50
would also have relationships with some
01:16:52
of the refs and it has SP over so the
01:16:55
NBA has had to deal with an example
01:16:58
where one of the refs were I think he
01:16:59
was betting on some games Don Tim Don
01:17:02
and then he was Point shaving so this
01:17:04
has been going on for a long time it
01:17:06
moved into the realm of it being
01:17:09
automated with algorithms looking out
01:17:12
the fact that this kid didn't have
01:17:15
anybody on his team that explained that
01:17:18
DraftKings and FanDuel are going to send
01:17:20
this data to the NBA is inexcusable
01:17:23
because maybe the kid would not have
01:17:25
done it right do you agree with the
01:17:27
lifetime ban or do you think there
01:17:28
should be yeah yeah it has to be
01:17:29
lifetime has to be for the NBA to have
01:17:32
integrity has yeah yeah it's really uh
01:17:35
and and what do we think about this
01:17:38
becoming legal in the US and people the
01:17:41
other thing I'll say well the other
01:17:42
thing I'll say and I and I mentioned
01:17:43
this a few weeks
01:17:45
ago everything is being gamified you
01:17:48
have an entire population that seemingly
01:17:52
in America consumer spending still goes
01:17:54
up folks are relatively still flush with
01:17:57
cash there's lots of free cash flow
01:18:00
there are new and
01:18:02
more aggressive forms of stimulus
01:18:05
constantly coming down the pike whether
01:18:07
it's student loan forgiveness or
01:18:09
something else right governments are
01:18:10
inventing new and new ways of buying
01:18:12
votes that's going to put more and more
01:18:13
money in people's hands that means a
01:18:16
larger and larger percentage of it will
01:18:18
bleed into these kinds of things and
01:18:19
it's not just Sports gambling there was
01:18:21
an article in the Wall Street Journal
01:18:23
about this woman who's a well-respected
01:18:25
lawyer who became totally addicted
01:18:27
playing like a bingo app right and lost
01:18:30
her entire life so these forms of
01:18:33
gambling and addiction are just going to
01:18:34
Skyrocket I think because you have these
01:18:37
apps that are really incredibly well-
01:18:40
engineered to get you super hooked and
01:18:43
then the adrenaline rush and the
01:18:45
dopamine Rush of actually winning money
01:18:47
is a thing that for some people they
01:18:49
can't turn off once they feel it for the
01:18:51
first time we know some of those people
01:18:52
and you know it's it's hard for them to
01:18:54
control their sports betting Blackjack
01:18:57
playing other things they just they get
01:18:59
too into it they get too into it they
01:19:01
get just and you know but other
01:19:03
societies other GEOS Australia New
01:19:06
Zealand and the UK they've had this for
01:19:08
a while so they figured out how to deal
01:19:10
with this this is what I'm going to tell
01:19:11
you the last thing I'll say on this is
01:19:12
when I was in high school so in the
01:19:13
early 90s in Ontario in Canada they
01:19:16
introduced sports betting as a way of
01:19:18
generating revenue for the government
01:19:21
what I will tell you is that my entire
01:19:23
High School all the boys not the girls
01:19:26
we became instant gambling
01:19:29
addicts we were figuring out how to put
01:19:31
bets on most of it was betting and
01:19:33
hockey because that's the sport that we
01:19:34
all knew the best growing up in in
01:19:38
Ottawa but it was all day every day it
01:19:41
consumed us and I think when you look
01:19:44
inside of these apps you're seeing a lot
01:19:45
of young men with a lot of free cash and
01:19:47
a lot of time getting sucked into the
01:19:49
gamification of this thing I think it's
01:19:51
going to be a big problem and I I will
01:19:53
tell you saaks I'm interested in your on
01:19:54
this cuz there is a whole system an
01:19:56
ecosystem emerging here the states are
01:19:58
getting massive amounts of Revenue 11
01:20:01
billion generated last year up 44.5%
01:20:05
from 2022 the league is printing money
01:20:08
from this all the leagues NBA will
01:20:10
generate 167 million from betting this
01:20:12
season up 11% year-over-year the sports
01:20:15
books obviously killing a Draft Kings
01:20:16
got a$ 20 billion market cap and betters
01:20:19
obviously love it it's more fun it's
01:20:21
making the games more engaging and the
01:20:24
media
01:20:25
is loving this all of the podcast Bill
01:20:28
Simmons ESPN you can't watch a game you
01:20:31
can't hear Sports commentary without
01:20:33
this being integrated and it's being
01:20:34
integrated at a very fundamental
01:20:36
editorial level they're asking the host
01:20:39
of these shows their spend what they're
01:20:41
betting on and they're doing something
01:20:43
very smart which is they're paying huge
01:20:45
endorsement deals to the players as well
01:20:47
yes I think DraftKings did something
01:20:48
with LeBron this is genius because when
01:20:50
you get that ingratiated you'll never
01:20:52
get ripped out because if they become a
01:20:54
huge part of the offc Court Revenue
01:20:56
model for these players yeah we're
01:20:59
locked in it's like it's like the new uh
01:21:01
it's like the new Air Jordans sax what
01:21:03
do you think about this just in terms of
01:21:04
on a societal basis and the United
01:21:07
States you know it's sort of like
01:21:09
cannabis you know it's this is a new
01:21:11
thing for Americans to have access to
01:21:13
there's a lot of weird behaviors going
01:21:15
on edge cases but what do you think net
01:21:17
net as a society you take away from the
01:21:20
emergence of sports batting and this
01:21:22
next Generation being so addicted to it
01:21:25
well I think cannabis is the right
01:21:26
analogy I think adults should be allowed
01:21:29
to bet on sporting events or just like
01:21:31
they're allowed to drink or you know
01:21:34
smoke pod or engage in other mild VI
01:21:37
some people handle it responsibly and
01:21:39
some don't it's probably on a societal
01:21:41
basis it's probably not a great thing
01:21:43
but it's something you allow to happen
01:21:46
because of personal freedom and
01:21:48
hopefully people use it
01:21:51
responsibly uh freeberg you have any
01:21:53
thoughts you play you place any bets
01:21:54
free broke have you plac any bets on
01:21:55
Sports I'm curious I do not you do not I
01:21:58
I don't I don't place bets on Sports but
01:22:00
I love playing cards because it's social
01:22:02
jamat do you do any sports betting now
01:22:04
and again maybe this maybe on the Super
01:22:06
Bowl you get uh once in a while you
01:22:07
place a bet a wager when I got admitted
01:22:10
to the ownership group in the NBA I
01:22:11
stopped and I've probably made three
01:22:14
bets since then both all three were like
01:22:17
on the Super Bowl at a casino which so
01:22:20
it was legal when I was still an owner
01:22:22
and I've not done it since and I've
01:22:24
refused to download these apps
01:22:26
because I love sports and I think that
01:22:29
if I added this to
01:22:32
it I just don't think it would be good
01:22:34
for me so I don't want to do it that was
01:22:36
my exact take too sack you ever place
01:22:38
any bets you're not a wager the stuff
01:22:39
either right yeah you ever bet on
01:22:42
chess is there any no one bets on chess
01:22:45
because it's so obvious who's going to
01:22:47
win there's like a very precise rating
01:22:48
system and correct so in poker poker's
01:22:52
very different because you can have
01:22:54
players at the same table and you know
01:22:56
who are the great players and who are
01:22:57
not the great players but still in any
01:22:59
given hand the underdog can win because
01:23:02
you can basically suck out or whatever
01:23:04
there's a significant luck component on
01:23:06
every single hand over the long term you
01:23:09
believe that the luck kind of evens out
01:23:11
and you reach your expected value but On
01:23:13
Any Given hand you can believe that
01:23:15
you're the winner and so there's a lot
01:23:17
of gambling and poker even though it is
01:23:19
a skill game in chess like that just
01:23:22
doesn't work I mean if I play Magnus
01:23:25
Carlson or any 2000 rated player I'm
01:23:28
just never gonna win so there's no point
01:23:30
in betting saak what's your rating
01:23:34
1400 I'm a little better than that I'm
01:23:36
like um I'm probably more like 1600 last
01:23:38
time I was 1400 I stopped playing him
01:23:40
because he would just I would get to the
01:23:42
middle game with sacks I get like 30
01:23:43
moves in and then he would just smash me
01:23:45
I'm like 800 or something I how do you
01:23:47
get better you have a
01:23:49
rating I don't want to talk about it he
01:23:52
doesn't want to talk but what's your
01:23:53
rating are you still upset about the
01:23:55
octopus
01:23:56
stuff no oh okay what's your but what's
01:23:59
your
01:24:00
rating question it's too personal a
01:24:03
question do you do you never share
01:24:05
information where people can actually
01:24:07
like R you yeah be vulnerable dude come
01:24:10
on ask ask me other questions just don't
01:24:13
ask me about my CH rating don't ask me
01:24:15
about my chest rating ask anything else
01:24:17
what's the best way to get better should
01:24:19
I get a coach or something saxs what's
01:24:21
the the chess.com app has very good
01:24:22
lessons on it too quite good yeah you
01:24:25
could get a coach and that would
01:24:26
definitely help there's also these
01:24:28
exercises you can do call puzzle rushes
01:24:30
that teach you how to spot tactics
01:24:32
that's all tactics that's probably half
01:24:34
the game yeah like you learn how to do a
01:24:37
night fork or something like that how to
01:24:39
do pins you just need to spot tactics
01:24:41
quickly is really key my puzzle Rush
01:24:42
scores are pretty good oh you're over a
01:24:45
thousand puzz no no you play it's like
01:24:47
how many you can get in a certain period
01:24:48
of Time how many and it gets it gets
01:24:50
sequentially harder as you complete the
01:24:52
puzzles and you have like a limited
01:24:55
period to do it so yet you feel shame
01:24:58
you feel shame if you want to get better
01:24:59
at chess I've watched a lot of Chess
01:25:01
videos on YouTube and there's a very
01:25:03
good series by John Bartholomew called
01:25:06
climbing the ratings ladder H and for
01:25:09
each level of Elo ratings he has a
01:25:12
series of videos so like I don't know if
01:25:14
you're like at 1200 there's a whole
01:25:16
series for 1200s and he'll play a bunch
01:25:19
of games against 1200s showing what they
01:25:21
typically do wrong and you can learn
01:25:24
from it it's
01:25:25
actually you spent have you spent time
01:25:27
socks like studying like openings and
01:25:31
like
01:25:31
studying like specific lines I don't
01:25:33
even know if I'm using the right
01:25:34
language here like um opening right I
01:25:38
haven't spent a ton of time studying
01:25:40
them but I'm certainly familiar with a
01:25:42
number of the most common
01:25:44
openings so I guess yes I guess on some
01:25:46
level I've studied them I would say that
01:25:49
depending on where you are in your
01:25:52
development that may not be the most
01:25:54
impressing thing for you to
01:25:56
do you know I think you you probably do
01:25:59
want to just know a few basics of a few
01:26:01
of the most common openings but but
01:26:04
there's probably other things for you to
01:26:05
learn first you don't need to like
01:26:07
memorize a bunch of complicated lines I
01:26:09
think it's like really cool that kids
01:26:11
are learning this I know this may be a
01:26:13
counter or a contrarian view but I I
01:26:15
think kids having access you know or
01:26:18
young adults having access to sports
01:26:19
batting poker is kind of a good thing
01:26:22
because I you know if controlled because
01:26:24
are learning about odds and gambling and
01:26:27
and framing it I um with my 14-year-old
01:26:30
are doing an allowance and then I
01:26:33
decided to do an investment club and so
01:26:35
I'm putting $100 every month into like a
01:26:37
Robin Hood account and we're going to do
01:26:40
like two meetings every month one to buy
01:26:42
a new stock and one to examine our
01:26:44
existing stocks and I'm just starting an
01:26:46
investment Club so if anybody's kids are
01:26:48
in that age group and they want to join
01:26:49
it let me know because I'm going to do
01:26:51
like a with the cousins like a zoom call
01:26:53
every month where we just talk about
01:26:55
stocks and then I'm going to have them
01:26:57
actually buy
01:26:58
it so that they can be prepared for the
01:27:01
real world and how companies are going
01:27:02
but how do you think about your kids jth
01:27:05
because you you got to do this gambling
01:27:06
when you were young didn't that help you
01:27:08
ultimately as an adult I mean I ran a
01:27:11
casino in my high
01:27:14
school was that was that the uh yeah I
01:27:17
mean I I ran a I ran a little blackjack
01:27:19
game where the rich kids could play and
01:27:21
I was the house and I would make a few
01:27:23
extra hundred bucks a week nice and that
01:27:27
was great because like you know between
01:27:28
that and my job at Burger King it really
01:27:31
helped and then I would go and take that
01:27:33
and I actually came pretty decent at
01:27:35
blackj and I would go they would there
01:27:36
would be these what's called charity
01:27:38
casinos so casinos in Ottawa Ontario
01:27:40
were illegal but if they were to raise
01:27:42
charity for various Charities they were
01:27:45
allowed and so my friend my friend and I
01:27:48
would show up at these things and just
01:27:49
run them
01:27:50
over anybody else run an illegal
01:27:52
business as a as a kid I'll tell you
01:27:54
about mine after sack do you run any
01:27:55
illegal businesses as a kid no comment
01:27:58
come on it's statue of limitations what
01:28:00
did you do you must have been running
01:28:01
some scams come on tell us I'll tell you
01:28:03
my two scams after you tell us yours oh
01:28:05
by the way I'll tell you I had a bad
01:28:06
dead situation in my in my oh really
01:28:08
lunch game you know I used to I used to
01:28:10
let people bet up to a buck okay so four
01:28:12
or five guys up you know 25 cents 50
01:28:15
cents or a dollar and one guy he like
01:28:18
demanded an expanded credit line and so
01:28:20
I gave him up to two bucks and how many
01:28:22
boxes a z did he go down and one lunch
01:28:25
he lost 80 bucks and it took me three
01:28:27
months to get paid it was the worst exp
01:28:29
of Z I had no $80 I had I'm just doing a
01:28:32
soprano I had to I had to sweat this guy
01:28:35
for three months to get my
01:28:36
80 he was rich too his parents were Rich
01:28:40
what he do did he have to do your term
01:28:41
papers or something did he have to do
01:28:42
your essays clean clean your bike I
01:28:45
wouldn't have gotten this come on give
01:28:46
it up what was your what was your scam
01:28:48
you were running as let's move
01:28:50
on I had two scams freeberg you have a
01:28:53
scam when you were running when you were
01:28:54
a kid any scams I used to go to the
01:28:58
Recycler newspaper do you guys remember
01:29:00
that yeah the recycler and I would buy
01:29:02
used like Electronics equipment computer
01:29:04
equipment and then I would like sell it
01:29:08
so I would then like post other ads I
01:29:10
basically did add Arbitrage as a way to
01:29:11
think about it so I would go and find
01:29:13
people selling stuff that I thought was
01:29:15
like underpriced and I would buy it
01:29:17
there was nothing to fix you would just
01:29:19
it was underpriced and then I knew like
01:29:20
the better Market to go sell it at and
01:29:21
make more money so then I'd buy like all
01:29:23
these like old like like a broken
01:29:25
receiver disc man and a receiver good
01:29:28
speaker speakers that I knew were good
01:29:30
but they were like deeply discounted I
01:29:32
drive around in my white van I'd pay
01:29:34
people cash I'd load it up and then I go
01:29:35
sell it to like other people by putting
01:29:37
ads no wonder you w up no wonder you
01:29:39
wound up at
01:29:40
Google I had I had two really good scams
01:29:43
when I was a kid the first was this guy
01:29:45
owed my dad some money for back gaming
01:29:47
my dad was a back gamon shark and he
01:29:49
would play in his bar when I would show
01:29:51
up at 6:00 in the morning my dad would
01:29:52
be playing blackjack with guys they
01:29:53
would get you know in deep with him and
01:29:57
so this guy who was in the mob owe my
01:29:59
dad some money and uh for The Vig he
01:30:02
gave him a copy of The Empire Strikes
01:30:04
Back on
01:30:05
VHS and I was like what you this is
01:30:09
before it was out they had recorded in
01:30:10
the movie theaters in 1984 or something3
01:30:13
whenever that came out and it was a
01:30:15
really bad copy so I my dad comes home
01:30:18
he gives me the copy we watch it it was
01:30:19
incredible it's like thanks Dad and I
01:30:21
got my friend to bring over his VHS I
01:30:23
made 10 copies of it I go to school in
01:30:25
McKinley junor High School in Brooklyn
01:30:27
and I sell them for 30 bucks a pop oh my
01:30:29
God selling like hot cakes and then I
01:30:32
get
01:30:33
pinched math teacher says what's going
01:30:35
on with these Empire Strikes Back and I
01:30:38
said uh what do you mean I don't know
01:30:39
what you're talking about he's like I
01:30:41
heard your got onire strikes back he
01:30:43
kept your mouth shut I looked him dead
01:30:45
in the eye and I said are you
01:30:47
interested the teacher goes yeah how
01:30:50
much are they I said 30 bucks but I'll
01:30:53
give you one for
01:30:54
10 and he said okay pulled out 10 bucks
01:30:57
I sold my math teacher I kid you not the
01:30:59
Empire Strike Back for 10 bucks can you
01:31:01
do this whole thing again but in the
01:31:02
Christopher Walkin voice I'm not gonna
01:31:05
but I'll give you the other one I did no
01:31:07
it's a Joe pesy voice do this one in the
01:31:08
Christopher Walkin voice and so the name
01:31:10
of it was Jason's hot tapes and so I
01:31:12
made a business card and laminated
01:31:13
Jason's hot tapes and I would hand it to
01:31:15
people and I'd hand them the Jason's hot
01:31:17
tape card and theyd say give me my card
01:31:19
back but I would just show him that I
01:31:20
had a card oh that reminds me I was also
01:31:22
in the fake ID business
01:31:24
oh say more yeah I grinded out I grinded
01:31:27
out fake IDs with a buddy of mine all
01:31:29
right that was mine that was mine oh Z
01:31:32
the fake ID business too we used Harvard
01:31:34
Graphics Sak what were you using I was
01:31:36
using Harvard Graphics well this was in
01:31:37
the days before Holograms and it wasn't
01:31:40
it just wasn't that hard to you know cop
01:31:42
so we just made like boards or whatever
01:31:44
and Polaroids so we did it for ourselves
01:31:47
and we did it for friends yeah same
01:31:48
here's the thing about the fake ID
01:31:50
business the bouncers were like if you
01:31:54
got money show us any piece of paper so
01:31:57
we have plausible we have plausible
01:31:59
deniability just wanted plausible
01:32:01
deniability that was the that's the key
01:32:03
to the racket did you put mck Lovin in
01:32:06
University of Hawaii yeah actually well
01:32:10
it's kind of funny is sometimes the
01:32:11
bouncers would go what's your name and
01:32:14
you'd be like you'd be stumped because
01:32:16
you didn't remember what so drunk you
01:32:18
don't even
01:32:19
remember like my name is was like my
01:32:23
name was like was like Raj
01:32:28
Patel Raj Patel or they' ask you what
01:32:31
was your birthday and you don't remember
01:32:32
what's on your ID you don't know what's
01:32:34
on your ID I don't remember I don't
01:32:36
remember you know the the key I had one
01:32:39
drink now the key in the fake ID game is
01:32:41
to use your your month and day that's
01:32:45
yours and then just change the Year yes
01:32:48
that's the key that's the key all right
01:32:50
so I'll give you the second one do it in
01:32:52
Christopher Walkin voice so my friend
01:32:55
his brother had a
01:32:58
DeLorean he I I can't do it I can't
01:33:01
sated anyway this kid U who I grew up
01:33:05
with oh I should sorry um anyway his
01:33:08
name was beep that out he lived up on
01:33:10
13th Avenue I go to his house his
01:33:13
brother's got a DeLorean it was
01:33:14
incredible and we're in junior high
01:33:16
school and I'm talking to his brother
01:33:18
and I go into the garage and there's all
01:33:20
DeLorean Parts on the wall and I said
01:33:24
why do you have all these parts and he
01:33:26
said oh you know uh there was a DeLorean
01:33:29
that um you know fell apart and we
01:33:32
picked up the pieces they had stolen
01:33:34
another DeLorean because DeLorean
01:33:35
stopped producing and they just chopped
01:33:37
it up but he had in his garage so anyway
01:33:39
uh we're playing Chessmaster at the time
01:33:41
and I had hacked a copy of Chessmaster
01:33:43
it was very easy to do and the guy said
01:33:45
you got Chessmaster can you get me more
01:33:47
copies of that I said sure how many
01:33:48
copies you want he's like how many can
01:33:49
you make I was like well floppy disc
01:33:51
costs four bucks he's like I'll give you
01:33:54
10 bucks a copy of Chess Master I said
01:33:55
fine I go with my friend we go steal
01:33:58
floppy discs uh from the store so we
01:34:02
didn't want to pay the four bucks for
01:34:03
them not the not the three and a halfs
01:34:04
the five and a quarter these are five
01:34:05
and a quarters and we go into the store
01:34:08
and we take the flyer and I hold the
01:34:11
flyer open and I hold it behind my back
01:34:13
and my friend takes the discs out of the
01:34:15
sleeve at Stables whatever Dums them in
01:34:17
there we made copies of it and then we
01:34:19
were selling Chessmaster for 10 bucks a
01:34:21
pop at scale and giving them to the guys
01:34:24
on 13th Avenue who were then reselling
01:34:25
them for 20 bucks this is when
01:34:26
Chessmaster was like a $100 product
01:34:28
Shout out to Chessmaster um but that was
01:34:32
my second scam business this is some
01:34:34
degenerate yeah and that's not even the
01:34:37
best one the I'll give you the best one
01:34:39
this is the best and I'll give you the
01:34:40
last scan we
01:34:41
ran there were parking permits in the
01:34:43
late 80s in Manhattan they were hard to
01:34:46
get but they were legit if you had a
01:34:49
parking permit in your window for the
01:34:51
fire department police you know you
01:34:54
could park in Manhattan in a lot of
01:34:55
different areas and so uh we went and we
01:34:59
took a picture of these then we got on
01:35:01
page maker or whatever and I went down
01:35:03
to Canal Street and I bought at uh Pearl
01:35:06
paints like the the same color orange
01:35:09
and that lamination kit and we got on
01:35:12
Photoshop I kid you not we held the
01:35:13
picture up and we tried to figure out
01:35:15
the fonts they used and we made a copy
01:35:18
of the placards to park and then we sold
01:35:21
those for like 50 bucks and people used
01:35:23
them and they wouldn't get tickets they
01:35:25
worked so we sold police placards that
01:35:28
had to be super illegal in 1988 all
01:35:30
right everybody four your Sultan of
01:35:32
science the exceptional David freedberg
01:35:35
your chairman dictator jth
01:35:37
ptia the Rainman yeah David Sachs I am
01:35:42
your world's greatest moderator J Cal
01:35:44
we'll see you on episode 176 and
01:35:47
hopefully in September at the all-in
01:35:49
summit bye-bye
01:35:52
byebye your Winner's
01:35:55
ride Rainman
01:35:59
David and it said we open source it to
01:36:02
the fans and they've just gone crazy
01:36:03
with it queen
01:36:09
[Music]
01:36:12
of
01:36:15
Besties my dog Tak
01:36:20
driveways oh man my habiter will meet me
01:36:23
at we should all just get a room and
01:36:24
just have one big huge orgy because
01:36:26
they're all just useless it's like this
01:36:28
like sexual tension that they just need
01:36:29
to release
01:36:30
[Music]
01:36:36
somehow we need to get mer
01:36:41
[Music]
01:36:45
our I'm going all
01:36:48
[Music]

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 70
    Most emotional
  • 65
    Most heartwarming
  • 60
    Most inspiring
  • 60
    Most chaotic

Episode Highlights

  • Celebrating Young Achievements
    A touching moment as a young winner presents an award to his sister, showcasing family pride and success.
    “This is an incredible achievement by like a 16-year-old.”
    @ 03m 29s
    April 19, 2024
  • Google Employees' Protest
    A discussion on the implications of Google employees protesting and the nature of their actions.
    “Protesting at work is misguided and distracting.”
    @ 21m 57s
    April 19, 2024
  • NPR's Leadership Controversy
    Katherine Mah's leadership at NPR sparks debate over the network's perceived bias.
    “An open-minded spirit no longer exists within NPR.”
    @ 36m 06s
    April 19, 2024
  • NPR Funding Debate
    Discussion on the implications of government funding for NPR and public broadcasting.
    “No government should fund one-sided ideological institutions.”
    @ 40m 28s
    April 19, 2024
  • Humane AI Pin Controversy
    The Humane AI pin faces backlash after a critical review by Marquez Brownlee.
    “He called it the worst product he's ever reviewed.”
    @ 41m 58s
    April 19, 2024
  • The Challenge of Deep Tech
    Investing in deep tech is risky as it often requires significant capital before product validation.
    “Deep tech investment is very likely to fail because you spend so much money.”
    @ 44m 02s
    April 19, 2024
  • The Impact of Technology on Social Interactions
    The discussion highlights the negative impact of smartphones on social gatherings and relationships.
    “It's depressing when everyone is on their phones.”
    @ 01h 00m 35s
    April 19, 2024
  • R&D Tax Problems for Startups
    A new tax law is crippling small businesses by forcing them to spread R&D expenses over five years.
    “This is brutal, obviously.”
    @ 01h 03m 19s
    April 19, 2024
  • NBA Player Banned for Betting Scandal
    Jonte Porter was banned for life after manipulating bets on his own performance.
    “This idiot now is banned for life from the NBA.”
    @ 01h 14m 41s
    April 19, 2024
  • The Rise of Sports Betting
    The conversation dives into the implications of legalized sports betting in the U.S.
    “Everything is being gamified.”
    @ 01h 17m 42s
    April 19, 2024
  • Childhood Gambling Ventures
    A light-hearted recount of running a blackjack game in high school.
    “I ran a little blackjack game where the rich kids could play.”
    @ 01h 27m 19s
    April 19, 2024
  • The Chessmaster Scam
    A childhood hustle where copies of Chessmaster were sold for profit.
    “We were selling Chessmaster for 10 bucks a pop at scale.”
    @ 01h 34m 21s
    April 19, 2024

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Breakthrough Prize03:00
  • Employee Naivety20:31
  • Protest Dynamics21:50
  • NPR Funding39:31
  • Deep Tech Risks43:14
  • NBA Betting Scandal1:14:43
  • Pirated Movies1:30:59
  • Chessmaster Hustle1:34:21

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Podcast thumbnail
E102: Elon closes Twitter deal, $META uncertainty, Zuck's historic bet, big tech decline & more
Podcast thumbnail
Sam Altman: Getting Fired (and Re-Hired) by OpenAI, Agents, AI Copyright issues
Podcast thumbnail
E170: Tech's Vibe Shift, TikTok ban debate, Vertical AI boom, Florida bans lab-grown meat & more
Podcast thumbnail
IPOs and SPACs are Back, Mag 7 Showdown, Zuck on Tilt, Apple's Fumble, GENIUS Act passes Senate
Podcast thumbnail
E134: Ukraine counteroffensive, China tensions, COVID Patient Zero, RFK Jr reaction & more
Podcast thumbnail
Break up Google, Starbucks CEO out, Kamala’s price controls, Boeing disaster, Kursk offensive
Podcast thumbnail
E113: DOJ tries to break up Google, vaccine questions, Ukraine escalation & more
Podcast thumbnail
JD Vance's AI Speech, Techno-Optimists vs Doomers, Tariffs, AI Court Cases with Naval Ravikant
Podcast thumbnail
E36: New FTC Chair, breaking up big tech, government silent spying, Jon Stewart, wildfires & more
Podcast thumbnail
Mag 7 sell-off, Wiz rejects Google, UBI, Kamala in, China's nuclear buildout, Sacks responds to PG