Search Captions & Ask AI

The Price of Power: Donald Trump and the Tech Broligarchs | Pivot

December 17, 2024 / 10:37

This episode discusses ABC News' $15 million settlement with Donald Trump over defamation comments made by George Stephanopoulos, the implications for media and business, and the influence of wealthy individuals in politics.

The conversation highlights how the settlement involves a donation to a presidential museum and includes a statement of regret from ABC. Experts believed that ABC could have won the case, but the fear of Trump's influence led to the settlement.

Key discussions include the potential for a second Trump administration to increase government coercion against businesses and the risks to innovation and competition in the U.S. economy.

Guests analyze the behavior of tech billionaires aligning with Trump out of fear of government actions under Biden, and the historical context of wealthy individuals influencing politics.

The episode concludes with reflections on the changing dynamics of power between wealthy individuals and government, questioning whether the current situation is unprecedented.

TL;DR

ABC News settles with Trump for $15 million over defamation, raising concerns about media influence and the role of wealth in politics.

Video

00:00:00
ABC News has agreed to pay $15 million
00:00:02
to settle a defamation lawsuit brought
00:00:04
by Donald Trump the suit Senator on
00:00:05
comments that ABC's George stephanov
00:00:08
made against a in a civil suit against
00:00:09
Trump brought by egene Carroll he said
00:00:11
he was found liable for rape when he
00:00:13
actually been found liable for sexually
00:00:15
assaulting and defaming
00:00:17
Carol uh the judge had had had mentioned
00:00:20
that it was in most terms that would be
00:00:22
considered that and that's I think why
00:00:24
he said it um but in fact the the jury
00:00:26
had found him liable for sexual assault
00:00:29
uh defamation under the terms of the
00:00:31
settlement ABC News will donate uh the
00:00:34
money $15 million uh to a future
00:00:37
presidential vation of Museum and
00:00:39
Stephanopoulos and ABC Al also issued a
00:00:41
statement of regret for the mistake um
00:00:44
many experts thought I I've talked to a
00:00:46
dozen lawyers they thought ABC would
00:00:48
have won and Trump is typically does
00:00:51
this a lot as a as a and so does
00:00:53
speaking of Elam mus we just talked
00:00:54
about him they use legal uh threats as a
00:00:56
means of of of uh having people acquest
00:01:00
so talk a little bit about this I mean
00:01:02
from a business point of view again it's
00:01:04
using censorship it's using legal means
00:01:07
it's using anything but actual
00:01:09
competition or just like things work out
00:01:13
it's more than that what we're seeing is
00:01:15
that I mean some of us had warned that
00:01:18
um that uh a trump ad second Trump
00:01:22
Administration would be one in which the
00:01:24
uh coercive power of the government uh
00:01:27
against business would become huge that
00:01:30
it mean that we're in a a mixed economy
00:01:32
the government plays a big role uh
00:01:35
private sector plays a big role a lots
00:01:38
of things in the private sector depend
00:01:39
upon government decisions that are
00:01:42
reasonably favorable um as long as you
00:01:45
have
00:01:46
rules Norms rule of law um then that
00:01:50
kind of works okay but if you start to
00:01:53
have arbitrary exercise and then one of
00:01:55
the things we're worried about on
00:01:57
tariffs um it happens to be the case
00:01:59
that the way that our trade laws are
00:02:01
written the president has enormous
00:02:03
discretion in tariff setting and in some
00:02:05
ways one of the worst things about Trump
00:02:07
tariffs will be not the tariffs he
00:02:09
applies but the ones he doesn't because
00:02:11
he can play favorites with who gets to
00:02:14
get Exempted from a tariff there's some
00:02:16
evidence he did that even on the
00:02:18
relatively small tariffs he imposed in
00:02:20
the first term so if you were ABC and
00:02:23
you're looking at uh at all the ways
00:02:26
that Trump can hurt you if he wants to
00:02:29
uh then you you know pay protection
00:02:32
money that's what just happened and this
00:02:34
is a much bigger thing than just
00:02:35
competition this is basically um big
00:02:37
business already acknowledging that
00:02:40
we've become a uh uh a protection racket
00:02:45
pay pay for play and uh that's that's
00:02:48
scarier than anything I mean it's uh it
00:02:51
that's uh uh is one of those reasons to
00:02:53
wonder whether you know uh 2024 was
00:02:57
maybe the last real election so talk a
00:02:59
little bit about because from a business
00:03:01
from an economy point of view you can
00:03:02
have a very robust economy even with
00:03:05
this cooperation or does It ultimately
00:03:07
end this oligarchy and in lack of
00:03:10
innovation which has been the Hallmark
00:03:12
of the US really um dominance and
00:03:15
Innovation and new fresh ideas we it's
00:03:17
really been a remarkable Run for the
00:03:19
United States over the last 40 we've had
00:03:21
an extraordinary the last 25 years you
00:03:24
know the uh in 2000 roughly all advanced
00:03:27
countries seemed to be about on the same
00:03:28
level technologically the US has now
00:03:30
pulled well ahead um and there one of
00:03:34
the pieces I've written recently says a
00:03:36
lot of that is actually just geography
00:03:38
there's probably room for only one
00:03:39
Silicon Valley anywhere in the world and
00:03:41
it happens to be here but the um but a
00:03:46
lot of it is also yeah
00:03:49
openness uh rule of law uh success
00:03:53
depends upon upon actually producing
00:03:54
stuff that people want and can use um on
00:03:58
being able to attract the best and
00:04:00
brightest from around the world to work
00:04:02
and all of that is at risk you're in a
00:04:05
situation where uh you we know that
00:04:08
there are people with influence on Trump
00:04:10
who who think of tech jobs as being
00:04:12
goodies to be handed out and don't not
00:04:15
don't let foreigners have those um we
00:04:17
know that uh we're May well be heading
00:04:21
for a situation in which um in which
00:04:25
success in business depends upon pull
00:04:27
with the administration depends on
00:04:29
whether you're in or out of favor um and
00:04:32
we even have I mean uh for what it's
00:04:35
worth uh regimes like that according to
00:04:38
an IMF meta study um it subtracts about
00:04:41
1% from growth year after year in year
00:04:44
after year how do you look at with all
00:04:45
these billionaires around him and they
00:04:47
certainly are just one it's mostly Tech
00:04:50
that's going there but Disney just did
00:04:51
this right this is Bob Iger doing this
00:04:54
uh making he he had had to approve of
00:04:56
this settlement and uh he has not you
00:04:58
haven't seen him at Mar but this is his
00:05:00
version of that right yeah um how what
00:05:03
is that what are were you surprised that
00:05:05
it's been the tech people who had mostly
00:05:07
stayed out of government right and until
00:05:09
they realized there was there was an
00:05:11
interview that Mark andreon did who I've
00:05:12
known for a long time I and largely a
00:05:15
Despicable character but um uh one of
00:05:18
the things he said he was terrified by
00:05:19
what Biden was going to do and he was
00:05:21
scared and that's what drove him into
00:05:22
Trump's arm which I think is absolute
00:05:25
Insanity
00:05:28
unlikely I mean I am actually not
00:05:30
surprised because I'm I'm a cynic and
00:05:32
the thing about tech by the way is you
00:05:34
know these are no longer upstart
00:05:35
innovators that we're talk about now
00:05:37
we're talking about people who you know
00:05:39
who were who made
00:05:41
their their billions very very young but
00:05:44
they're now middle-aged and um and
00:05:47
they're sitting on in many ways on on
00:05:49
these uh Monopoly positions created by
00:05:52
by their past efforts um and of course
00:05:56
they're going to try and Curry favor
00:05:57
with the government the the libertarian
00:05:59
IDE ideology was never more than Skin
00:06:02
Deep um but I also think that some of
00:06:05
the backing Trump you know this is the
00:06:08
classic error uh oligarchs it's funny in
00:06:12
a in a democratic rule of law Nation
00:06:16
great wealth brings a lot of power with
00:06:18
it uh and it's natural to think well if
00:06:22
I help elect an autocrat who will uh you
00:06:26
know will is sympathetic to my interest
00:06:28
that th I'll have even more power but
00:06:31
you very quickly find out that actually
00:06:34
all of the power is on the other side
00:06:36
that the uh uh and you know I don't
00:06:39
think analogies with Putin I mean I'm
00:06:41
hoping that we're not going to go full
00:06:43
Putin but the analogies are really
00:06:44
clearly there and the oligarchs who
00:06:46
helped put Putin in power thought that
00:06:48
they had bought themselves a government
00:06:50
and they found out that they were
00:06:52
working for him not the other way around
00:06:54
right and if they didn't uh work for him
00:06:57
they were you know their Fortune can
00:06:59
disappear quite quickly Windows started
00:07:01
to look very well and then falling out
00:07:03
of Windows I hope we don't get to the
00:07:04
falling out of Windows stage but it
00:07:05
could right and so no this is a and
00:07:08
that's going to happen very very fast I
00:07:09
mean I'm I think there's a reasonably
00:07:12
strong case to that that Elon Musk and
00:07:15
Trump will have a falling out and uh
00:07:17
musk will not be the winner and I don't
00:07:20
know that for sure but I'm actually kind
00:07:23
of looking forward to it to be honest
00:07:26
okay to that where do you where does it
00:07:29
where does that break is because rich
00:07:30
people have always been quietly running
00:07:33
the country right the the whole idea of
00:07:35
whoever down degrees and degrees yes but
00:07:37
what is this unprecedented I don't think
00:07:40
so right it's totally precedented this
00:07:43
is about this the story of Putin's
00:07:44
Russia this what about in our country
00:07:47
that there have been wealthy people
00:07:49
behind the scenes they just aren't as
00:07:50
performative they don't jump down at a
00:07:52
rally and show off their belly and stuff
00:07:55
like that what how is this different I
00:07:58
actually have had been wondering about
00:08:00
that and planning to do a little you
00:08:02
know I'm not a historian but I think it
00:08:04
it really is an interesting question you
00:08:06
we had a Gilded Age um in which there
00:08:09
were enormous fortunes and and a lot of
00:08:13
raw corruption and yet Democratic
00:08:16
institutions were not corrupted too much
00:08:19
I mean there a lot of purchased votes
00:08:21
and all of that but in the end when
00:08:23
people voted for something different
00:08:25
those votes were honored uh we we didn't
00:08:28
lose
00:08:30
um uh in some ways the essence of what
00:08:34
America's about despite all of that and
00:08:37
it's an interesting question to ask why
00:08:40
why didn't the uh the JD Rock fellas and
00:08:43
the JP Morgans um you know go to the
00:08:47
Limit why were they willing to allow you
00:08:50
Teddy Roosevelt to be elected
00:08:53
um FDR wealthy person JFK wealthy like
00:08:57
billionair well FDR brought us closer to
00:08:59
than we like to think but yeah um but
00:09:02
the but the you know how did the
00:09:05
Progressive Movement manag to flourish
00:09:07
in a time when the wealthy also had that
00:09:10
and I don't quite know the answer
00:09:11
although it's possible hard to believe
00:09:14
it's possible that people actually had
00:09:16
at least some values and ideals enough
00:09:18
to say that okay I will go this far but
00:09:20
not beyond that
00:09:22
point I'm not so sure with this crew
00:09:24
we'll see I'm not so sure either we'll
00:09:26
see I know I'm certain they will go as
00:09:28
far as they take because they are
00:09:29
perpetually grieved they're grieved Paul
00:09:32
because they're very VI they're the
00:09:33
victims just so you know oh yeah that
00:09:35
it's one thing I mean you would know
00:09:36
better than me but my my my really
00:09:38
strong sense is that particularly the
00:09:40
the tech Bros um I mean everybody loved
00:09:44
and admired them 10 15 years ago and now
00:09:48
they're they still have more money than
00:09:49
God but yeah they're not loved and
00:09:51
admired universally and I think that
00:09:53
really you know I do spend enough time
00:09:55
in meetings with uh people of of various
00:09:59
people at the top of multiple status
00:10:01
hierarchies yeah and everybody wants to
00:10:04
be what they aren't yeah and uh and
00:10:07
these These are people who can buy
00:10:09
anything except except love and
00:10:11
agulation that's correct it was funny
00:10:13
funny you say that because one of them
00:10:15
uh was in touch with me and that like
00:10:16
see we won and I said you're still an
00:10:19
I still think you're an
00:10:22
and so I'm sorry can I say this but I I
00:10:24
apparently somebody used uh grock to
00:10:26
search for the most the word most
00:10:28
commonly used to characterize Elon Musk
00:10:30
yeah and it was

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 60
    Most shocking
  • 60
    Most controversial

Episode Highlights

  • Legal Threats as Censorship
    Experts discuss how legal threats are used to stifle competition and dissent.
    “It's using anything but actual competition.”
    @ 01m 07s
    December 17, 2024
  • The Risk of Oligarchy
    Concerns arise about the future of innovation and democracy under oligarchic influences.
    “This is basically big business acknowledging that we've become a protection racket.”
    @ 02m 37s
    December 17, 2024

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Defamation Lawsuit00:02
  • Legal Threats00:56
  • Oligarchy Concerns03:10
  • Tech Billionaires10:11

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Podcast thumbnail
Trump Says U.S. Is “In Charge” of Venezuela — But What Happens Next? | Pivot
Podcast thumbnail
Did Gavin Newsom Just Become the Best Democratic Nominee for President? | Pivot