Search Captions & Ask AI

E150: Israel/Gaza escalating or not? EU censorship regime, Penn donors revolt, GLP-1 hype cycle

October 20, 2023 / 01:28:02

This episode of the All-In Podcast covers the ongoing conflict in Israel and Gaza, featuring discussions on the humanitarian crisis, political implications, and personal reflections from the hosts. Guests include David Sacks and David Friedberg.

The hosts express their emotional responses to the recent events in Israel, particularly the terrorist attacks and the subsequent violence in Gaza. They share their concerns about the impact on families and children caught in the conflict.

David Sacks shares his thoughts on the media's portrayal of the situation, particularly regarding the bombing of a hospital in Gaza, and the subsequent protests across the Middle East. He emphasizes the need for careful analysis before drawing conclusions about responsibility.

David Friedberg discusses the potential for escalation in the conflict and the importance of understanding the internal dynamics within Israel's government, particularly the influence of far-right factions.

The episode concludes with a discussion on the implications of the conflict for international relations and the challenges of achieving peace in the region.

TL;DR

The episode discusses the Israel-Gaza conflict, emotional responses, media portrayal, and implications for peace and international relations.

Video

00:00:00
well you're talking about three very
00:00:01
different actors there wait David David
00:00:03
behind you is your security cameras are
00:00:05
on do you want to turn those off yeah I
00:00:06
don't know how
00:00:07
that all right hold on a
00:00:10
second you sit there and watch those all
00:00:12
day security
00:00:13
apparatus Christ what is this guy the
00:00:17
Batman he sits in that couch all day and
00:00:19
watches his security Wayne hey did you
00:00:22
see that behind him it was so dystopian
00:00:25
oh my gosh you must have caught some
00:00:27
crazy [ __ ] on those security cameras
00:00:28
sucks what do you do with that
00:00:32
[Music]
00:00:33
let your winners
00:00:34
[Music]
00:00:39
ride and instead we open source it to
00:00:42
the fans and they've just gone crazy
00:00:44
with it
00:00:48
Queen okay everybody Welcome to episode
00:00:51
150 of the Allin podcast yes we've made
00:00:55
it to 150 episodes somehow talking about
00:00:58
technology business and of course
00:01:01
politics and this week we will continue
00:01:05
our
00:01:05
discussion tragically about the
00:01:08
situation in Israel and the war with
00:01:10
Hamas and a lot of the
00:01:13
downstream effects of what's going on
00:01:16
here and try to make sense of the world
00:01:17
as we do we gave a disclaimer last week
00:01:19
we're not experts and I suspect many of
00:01:23
you are not experts on this but we're
00:01:25
going to try to talk about the hard
00:01:28
topic here and do it good faith and then
00:01:31
we will move on to topics that don't
00:01:33
have to do with the war in Gaza uh That
00:01:37
Could by the time you read this again
00:01:38
another disclaimer by the time you
00:01:40
listen to this podcast a ground Invasion
00:01:44
may or may not have started we tape
00:01:46
these on Thursdays and you listen to
00:01:48
them generally speaking on Saturdays and
00:01:50
Sundays with me again this week chth
00:01:53
poaa David saaks and of course David
00:01:57
Friedberg and uh gentlemen I'm just just
00:02:00
going around the horn here quick before
00:02:01
I tee up the first topic how's everybody
00:02:04
feeling about the events uh and in the
00:02:07
10 days since 107 in the terrorist
00:02:11
attack that occurred in Israel I skipped
00:02:13
last
00:02:14
week I was too emotional to do the show
00:02:17
just so folks know it was
00:02:21
uh
00:02:23
difficult to see what I saw on the
00:02:26
internet and the
00:02:28
reporting I think I was really
00:02:34
moved because I thought a lot about the
00:02:38
like how lucky we are and like my I
00:02:40
thought about my children and seeing
00:02:43
what I saw and being a parent
00:02:47
um it's really
00:02:49
different I remember 911 it was really
00:02:52
shocking I was really upset from 911 as
00:02:55
well but when I saw the events last
00:02:58
week it it immediately projected onto my
00:03:01
kids and the uh care I try and take for
00:03:04
my kids and thinking
00:03:06
about the experience of other people in
00:03:09
this situation I I was also I'll be
00:03:12
honest really moved and
00:03:15
saddened because of the bombing of
00:03:19
children in Gaza and I was really
00:03:21
saddened that there were innocent
00:03:23
children suffering there as
00:03:26
well and the whole thing just felt so
00:03:29
horrific to me I I don't think about the
00:03:32
justification or the morality of one
00:03:35
side over another I I was just more
00:03:37
moved because I I felt really sad about
00:03:39
the experience of a lot of families and
00:03:41
a lot of children caught in the middle
00:03:44
caught in this in this environment so I
00:03:46
was I was pretty hurt last week I was in
00:03:48
a really bad State and I couldn't do the
00:03:50
show I
00:03:52
think you know time has allowed me to
00:03:55
kind of become a bit rational about
00:03:56
things and try to understand where
00:03:58
things are headed and it's a really
00:03:59
complicated confusing situation and it's
00:04:02
really sad I I worry a lot about where
00:04:04
things are headed not just in the Middle
00:04:07
East but also domestically coming out of
00:04:09
this
00:04:11
conflict so that's where I'm at yeah
00:04:14
thank you for sharing I wasn't sure if
00:04:16
you would share um your absence last
00:04:18
week and I think it's fair I too have
00:04:21
been thinking about my own children and
00:04:23
it's uh and 911 and and it's it's very
00:04:26
dark yeah and so it's hard to talk about
00:04:30
but we're we're making progress here I
00:04:32
think and uh today we we'll talk about a
00:04:34
lot of the issues chth or saxs any uh
00:04:38
opening thoughts before we get started
00:04:40
uh delving into what's actually
00:04:43
happening and then more importantly I
00:04:45
think where this is heading and what the
00:04:49
possible outcome or resolution could be
00:04:52
if there is a resolution
00:04:54
here I think things are getting better
00:04:56
actually I think from where if if you
00:04:59
had to graph your expectations of how
00:05:02
bad things could get I think what most
00:05:05
people would probably say is somewhere
00:05:07
last week there was a scepter of some
00:05:11
potential World War III like
00:05:14
contagion and I think in
00:05:18
general it hasn't stopped some of the
00:05:21
Bloodshed but the extent to which we
00:05:24
expected this thing to escalate it
00:05:26
actually hasn't happened and so if you
00:05:28
take a step back and you kind of calmly
00:05:31
and coldly look at the
00:05:33
facts I think that there are a lot of
00:05:36
people on all sides trying
00:05:39
to maintain their composure in a moment
00:05:42
where there's a lot
00:05:44
of brush
00:05:47
fires
00:05:48
so I actually think that this has
00:05:53
been much much better than it could have
00:05:56
been and so I'm generally optimistic
00:05:59
that we're going to find our way out of
00:06:00
this so uh saaks any thoughts as we well
00:06:04
to be honest I can't be as optimistic as
00:06:06
tth it's true that World War III hasn't
00:06:08
started yet but I think the situation is
00:06:10
incredibly volatile still just the last
00:06:13
couple of days the headline story was an
00:06:17
explosion or bombing of this Hospital in
00:06:21
Gaza blame immediately fell on Israel
00:06:24
the claim in the New York Times was that
00:06:26
they had Dropped a Bomb on it from a
00:06:28
plane so media was a flame with that I
00:06:32
think in the last day or so the
00:06:35
perspective seems to be changing there's
00:06:38
video now showing that it wasn't the
00:06:40
hospital but rather the parking lot next
00:06:42
to the hospital that took the brunt to
00:06:45
the damage I think that it's far from
00:06:49
clear that Israel did it a lot of people
00:06:50
are
00:06:51
blaming Islamic Jihad in any event it's
00:06:54
very unclear so I'm going to continue to
00:06:57
do what I've done which is suspend
00:06:58
judgment until there can be some sort of
00:07:00
proper investigation of of what happened
00:07:02
and we find out exactly who's really
00:07:04
responsible but it does seem that over
00:07:07
the last day or so there's been now a
00:07:10
backing off of the idea that Israel was
00:07:12
definitely responsible for this
00:07:13
nonetheless you saw immediately in the
00:07:16
wake of that Story coming out that there
00:07:20
were protests and riots all over the
00:07:24
Middle East the Arab Street was
00:07:27
absolutely ignited and I think that the
00:07:31
Arab Street's not going to be convinced
00:07:33
that Israel wasn't responsible for this
00:07:35
I just think that they're convinced and
00:07:36
I think partisans on both sides are
00:07:39
convinced about who did it and they're
00:07:42
going to be immune to whatever evidence
00:07:43
comes out so I think that's kind of the
00:07:45
situation we're at right now I would
00:07:48
consider the the riots that we just saw
00:07:52
in regards to the hospital and the
00:07:53
eruption on social media to be a a
00:07:55
Prelude or dress rehearsal of what we
00:07:59
can expect to happen almost every day if
00:08:02
Israel proceeds with the ground invasion
00:08:04
of Gaza now they haven't done that yet
00:08:07
and that's why the situation seems
00:08:10
tenuous but stable but we're still
00:08:12
waiting to find out if Israel is going
00:08:14
to go into Gaza and if they do I think
00:08:17
all bets are off in terms of where this
00:08:18
is going this was my biggest concern
00:08:21
last week I um I think the thing I was
00:08:24
most anxious about
00:08:25
was that the
00:08:27
imagery that would come out of
00:08:30
Gaza
00:08:32
with the action from Israel would be the
00:08:36
F for escalation worldwide that there's
00:08:40
this perception already with half a
00:08:45
billion people maybe two billion people
00:08:48
maybe more that there's an oppressor and
00:08:51
there's an oppressed and the
00:08:52
oppressed is suffering under the
00:08:55
oppressor and that there would be the
00:08:57
creation of fodder to support that
00:08:58
narrative
00:08:59
and I think that the hospital bombing
00:09:01
the kind of point I made to someone who
00:09:03
reached out to me two days ago or
00:09:06
yesterday about it was I don't know if
00:09:08
it matters that we get the corrections
00:09:11
from all these people that may have said
00:09:12
something that turns out to not be true
00:09:15
because it was almost like that media
00:09:17
became confirmation bias for people that
00:09:19
already felt that this is what was going
00:09:22
on and this is simply evidence of what
00:09:24
is going on and it
00:09:26
justifies the next step it it jus the
00:09:29
beliefs it
00:09:30
justifies the
00:09:32
morality and I don't think that if it if
00:09:36
it wasn't this it's some it's going to
00:09:38
be something else there is a Tinder Box
00:09:40
ready to be lit and that Tinder Box is
00:09:43
just looking for a match and whether
00:09:44
it's this match or the next match
00:09:46
there's going to be a match and the
00:09:48
Tinder Box will be lit I think that a
00:09:50
large number of people feel like they're
00:09:53
on the right side everyone thinks
00:09:54
they're on the right side of something
00:09:56
everyone feels like they have the right
00:09:58
moral stand that there is a regime on
00:10:00
the other side that has the wrong moral
00:10:02
stance I am good you are evil and
00:10:05
therefore anything I see is my
00:10:08
confirmation bias for my belief and
00:10:11
it'll it gives me permission to take the
00:10:13
next step and in that framework it will
00:10:17
only escalate and we are only going to a
00:10:20
dark place and I think the the real
00:10:22
question for me to chim's optimism is
00:10:25
what are the muting factors what are the
00:10:27
factors where one side feels like
00:10:30
they're getting something that forces
00:10:32
them to say I'm not going to take the
00:10:34
next step I'm not going to justify the
00:10:36
next step and it's a it's a really hard
00:10:38
question to answer at this stage look
00:10:40
let's let's take that other side and
00:10:42
just explore it for a second
00:10:44
so the question that I've been asking
00:10:47
myself is and because I agree with you
00:10:50
it doesn't matter who was responsible
00:10:52
for this bombing because it's already
00:10:54
been defined yeah but in a moral sense
00:10:56
it does just no no in a moral sense it
00:10:58
does but saying practically in the
00:11:00
theater of war and the theaters near the
00:11:02
war it doesn't matter because it's about
00:11:05
how is it framed and to your point
00:11:08
people have already made up their
00:11:10
minds the pro-israel side have made up
00:11:14
their mind and the pro Palestinian side
00:11:17
has made up their mind but the question
00:11:20
that I ask myself is okay is that how
00:11:23
much of an incremental escalation is it
00:11:26
from what their status quo is you know
00:11:29
one of the interesting things I learned
00:11:32
from the Jared Kushner interview with
00:11:34
Lex fredman it's like a lot of this
00:11:38
tension you can trace back to the alaxa
00:11:43
mosque and all of the misinformation
00:11:45
around that right he spends a a section
00:11:48
of that podcast talking about how that's
00:11:50
been framed and reframed the Miss and
00:11:53
disinformation to basically get people
00:11:55
fervently up in arms and it turns out
00:11:58
that it is isn't under the supervision
00:12:00
of the Israelis and in fact you know you
00:12:03
can go get a visa to visit alaxa mosque
00:12:05
and it's under the custodian ship of the
00:12:07
King of Jordan as an example so that is
00:12:10
the fact but those facts aren't
00:12:13
necessarily shared on the ground and
00:12:16
that is where a lot of this original
00:12:18
tension comes from so then I ask myself
00:12:21
okay well if that's been lingering for
00:12:24
decades how much more incrementally bad
00:12:26
does it get for this specific thing and
00:12:30
I think you see it in people's actions
00:12:31
which is they try to use it to escalate
00:12:35
and my honest measurement of that
00:12:37
escalation is that outside of the actual
00:12:40
theater of
00:12:41
war most of these escalations died down
00:12:44
pretty quickly now if all of these
00:12:47
embassies were overrun and all of a
00:12:49
sudden you saw a Beirut like situation
00:12:53
right the US Embassy in Beirut in the
00:12:54
early ' 80s I would agree with you that
00:12:56
this is getting really bad really
00:12:58
quickly
00:12:59
but that's not what we saw and I think
00:13:01
what that speaks to more is how much
00:13:04
hatred is actually in the heart of
00:13:05
people versus
00:13:06
not and so I think that this was a
00:13:10
moment for
00:13:11
people to channel their anxiety and some
00:13:14
of their aggression and some of their
00:13:17
hatred towards America or Israel but
00:13:19
what it didn't was escalate you didn't
00:13:22
see these embassies get burned to the
00:13:24
ground you didn't see people getting
00:13:25
dragged out and so I'm not trying to
00:13:27
justify that behavior I'm just is trying
00:13:29
to look at it in an absolute sense and
00:13:31
answer the question is it escalating or
00:13:34
is it not
00:13:35
escalating and my assessment right now
00:13:39
is that it is not escalating I saw on
00:13:43
Sunday something that I thought I would
00:13:45
never see which is Iran put out a press
00:13:48
release through the United Nations to
00:13:50
Israel you haven't seen that that's
00:13:52
de-escalatory that's not an escalatory
00:13:55
action from a country whose mission
00:13:56
statement includes the destruction and
00:13:58
Dem eyes of a
00:13:59
country so I think when push comes to
00:14:03
shove there are a lot of people in
00:14:05
positions of power who understand the
00:14:07
stakes
00:14:08
here and are trying their best on both
00:14:12
sides and I I hate this word so I can't
00:14:15
even believe I'm about to use it to find
00:14:16
some proportionality and try to
00:14:18
deescalate that's how I measure and
00:14:20
judge what I
00:14:21
see over the last week a lot of
00:14:25
people use labels to characterize
00:14:29
the actions the tonality the behavior of
00:14:32
the other side because every everyone
00:14:35
believes that they're on the right side
00:14:38
and the point of view that there is hate
00:14:41
and anger on the other side comes from a
00:14:44
place not out of the blue hate and anger
00:14:46
doesn't just emerge from nothing it it
00:14:48
typically comes from a place of deep
00:14:50
hurt I think the biggest question for me
00:14:54
is how do you resolve the Deep
00:14:56
hurt that is being felt and has been
00:15:00
felt by either side over a very long
00:15:02
period of time it's the hardest thing to
00:15:04
answer because what do you give millions
00:15:08
of people that have lived feeling hurt
00:15:10
for so long feeling challenged for so
00:15:12
long that makes them feel resolved in
00:15:16
that sense and I get that speaking about
00:15:18
the Palestinian people I'm speaking
00:15:20
about the Israeli people too okay and
00:15:23
I'm I'm speaking about the fact that
00:15:25
like these actions don't they don't come
00:15:28
out the blue they don't come out of a
00:15:30
place of like
00:15:32
GRE let's go to an example in our own
00:15:34
lives let's just say that we have a
00:15:36
friend or you know we had a girlfriend
00:15:38
at some point where there is a deep
00:15:41
betrayal okay and then there's
00:15:44
just an unrelenting
00:15:47
anger to your point before you can talk
00:15:51
about the hurt you have to deescalate
00:15:53
the anger so there has to be an active
00:15:56
process of deescalation before you can
00:15:58
actually resolve this stuff I thought
00:16:00
Israel was quite clear last week we are
00:16:02
going into Gaza on Sunday but then they
00:16:06
didn't that seemed de-escalatory again
00:16:09
I'll just say it again Iran puts out a
00:16:11
press release to Israel through the UN
00:16:15
that seemed
00:16:16
de-escalatory there was a moment where
00:16:20
Jordan the Palestinian Authority and
00:16:23
Biden were supposed to meet they ended
00:16:25
up not meeting in
00:16:26
Aman but that seemed
00:16:29
escalatory Biden Tony blink Tony refused
00:16:32
to leave the IDF until he got some
00:16:34
insurances about humanitarian Aid into
00:16:36
Gaza that seems
00:16:38
de-escalatory Biden spending time and
00:16:40
then reiterating those assurances from
00:16:42
Netanyahu again all of this stuff seems
00:16:45
like both sides are in the middle of all
00:16:48
of this chaos not trying to light the
00:16:50
Tinder Box and it doesn't mean that
00:16:52
they're on a path to resolution but I I
00:16:55
I just think that they they understand
00:16:57
the stakes facts
00:16:59
when we look at the hospital situation
00:17:01
specifically and the fog of War you had
00:17:04
the New York
00:17:06
Times getting attacked for maybe taking
00:17:10
hamas's word for it then flipping and
00:17:13
then now there is conspiracy theory the
00:17:16
United States is you know carrying water
00:17:19
for Israel and then the fog of War oh my
00:17:23
goodness we maybe the the hospital
00:17:25
wasn't even hit it was in the it was in
00:17:27
the parking lot and so it it didn't even
00:17:29
get hit so when we look at all of that
00:17:32
and then shamad says hey wait things
00:17:33
haven't escalated I I actually I happen
00:17:35
to be here in Dubai right now on a
00:17:37
business trip and I'll explain some of
00:17:40
uh the feedback I've gotten from
00:17:43
people who are Palestinian uh ethnically
00:17:48
or Jordanian and of Palestinian descent
00:17:50
I should say and and we'll get into that
00:17:52
in the second the ground war hasn't
00:17:54
happened and this seems to be one of the
00:17:57
as jamaat is pointing out it's
00:17:59
fascinating that it hasn't because it
00:18:01
was supposed to have happened already do
00:18:02
you have any thoughts on why it hasn't
00:18:04
happened one of the conspiracy theories
00:18:06
and and I hate to go down these roads
00:18:08
because in the fog of War I think people
00:18:11
try to fill a vacuum and then of course
00:18:13
as you were pointing out your mouth in
00:18:14
freeberg people then use it as evidence
00:18:16
for their side the people here in Dubai
00:18:19
a number of people have pointed out this
00:18:21
uh ground war is not going to happen
00:18:23
that it's saber rattling but uh Israel
00:18:27
is going to back back down and get the
00:18:29
hostages back and this has been told to
00:18:31
me by many people and I don't know if
00:18:33
that's wishful thinking or some kind of
00:18:35
conspiracy theory but but what do you
00:18:36
take from the ground war not happening
00:18:39
and then if you want to go back and
00:18:40
touch on the fog of War issue here with
00:18:43
things flipping back and forth and and
00:18:45
what is actual reality and just broadly
00:18:48
speaking escalating or de-escalating
00:18:49
facts look I think that there's a few
00:18:52
possible reasons why Israel hasn't gone
00:18:53
in yet number one is they may perceive
00:18:56
it to be a very difficult military opper
00:18:58
operation they're almost certainly
00:18:59
walking into a trap there's going to be
00:19:01
ambushes everywhere snipers
00:19:04
IEDs Hamas has an elaborate tunnel
00:19:07
Network they can disappear down that
00:19:08
tunnel Network when the fighting gets
00:19:10
too hot they can booby trap the access
00:19:13
points they've got anti-tank weapons
00:19:15
they can take out armored vehicles it's
00:19:18
going to be a very difficult fight for
00:19:20
the Israelis and so they may be taking a
00:19:23
pause here just to assess that situation
00:19:26
and maybe get organized for it or or
00:19:28
maybe think better of it so they may be
00:19:30
either stopping to organize or getting
00:19:33
cold feet I think second they have to
00:19:35
think through the consequences of going
00:19:37
in there Hezbollah has basically
00:19:40
threatened to open up a northern front
00:19:42
and invade Israel if Israel goes into
00:19:45
Gaza you also saw as we saw at the
00:19:48
reaction to the hospital uh bombing that
00:19:52
they have be concerned about the Arab
00:19:53
Street erupting and again if they go
00:19:56
into Gaza this could ignite the whole
00:19:58
Arab world it seems to me that if you're
00:20:00
Israel you don't want to become the
00:20:02
focal point for all of this anger in the
00:20:06
Arab or larger Muslim World there are
00:20:09
important differences in that world
00:20:11
there's differences between sunnis and
00:20:13
Shiite there's differences between Arabs
00:20:16
and Persians and Turks and the last
00:20:19
thing you want is to paper over all
00:20:21
those differences by having everybody's
00:20:23
anger targeted at you so I think there's
00:20:26
very big consequences that could follow
00:20:29
geopolitically I think again the war
00:20:31
would almost certainly not just be a
00:20:33
single front war against Gaza it could
00:20:35
turn into multi-front war so that's I
00:20:37
think the second reason I think the
00:20:38
third reason is you have to believe that
00:20:40
there's Furious diplomacy going on
00:20:42
behind the scenes and I think this is
00:20:44
what chamath is referring to what we
00:20:47
don't know obviously or the the content
00:20:49
of those conversations we don't know
00:20:51
what the B Administration has told the
00:20:54
Netanyahu government we don't know if
00:20:57
they've said to to them listen we are
00:20:59
not going to get involved in this
00:21:01
publicly they've said that we stand with
00:21:02
Israel but you just have to wonder what
00:21:04
they're privately telling the Israelis
00:21:08
all of that being said I think that
00:21:10
Israel has declared that it's at war
00:21:12
with Hamas there are these stories that
00:21:15
are coming out daily of these atrocities
00:21:17
that were perpetrated by Hamas I saw one
00:21:20
by paramedics who discovered the bodies
00:21:21
and described the way they were tortured
00:21:23
the population of Israel demands
00:21:27
retribution and so Netanyahu is under
00:21:29
intense domestic political pressure to
00:21:32
deliver on
00:21:34
that so I I think that jamaath is right
00:21:37
that things haven't escalated yet but I
00:21:38
wouldn't say they've de-escalated
00:21:40
blinkin did demand and Biden did
00:21:42
announce those uh relieving of some of
00:21:45
the humanitarian issues in Gaza but to
00:21:47
my knowledge they have not been
00:21:48
implemented yet they turned the water
00:21:50
back on I believe yeah okay so I think
00:21:52
this thing is still a powder keg and it
00:21:54
could erupt and again it all comes back
00:21:56
to this key question of does Israel go
00:21:59
into to Gaza or not if they don't then I
00:22:02
think that creates room for some sort of
00:22:05
international diplomatic effort to get
00:22:07
the hostages back and maybe deescalate
00:22:10
the situation and I guess we'll find out
00:22:12
over the next week or so and that you
00:22:15
didn't even mention that there could be
00:22:16
some deep diplomacy here going on in
00:22:18
terms of releasing the hostages and
00:22:20
maybe somehow they believe if they go in
00:22:22
too
00:22:23
early the chances of getting those
00:22:25
hostages out alive could be seriously
00:22:28
diminished yeah you know it's strange to
00:22:29
me that I just don't hear that much
00:22:31
about the hostages it it seems like the
00:22:34
Israeli population just in terms of what
00:22:36
they're publicly saying seems to have
00:22:38
almost written off the hostages there
00:22:40
was some video of the families of the
00:22:42
hostages being upset that they don't
00:22:44
feel like the government response is
00:22:45
adequately taking the interests of their
00:22:48
families into account that they just
00:22:50
seem hellbent on this invasion of Gaza
00:22:54
but you know we don't know what's
00:22:56
happening behind the scenes and
00:22:58
again that that would be the way to
00:23:00
deescalate this is you get an
00:23:01
international effort to release the
00:23:04
hostages in exchange for maybe it can't
00:23:07
be stated but quit Pro quot where Israel
00:23:09
does not go into to Gaza on the ground
00:23:11
and and maybe the bombing stops yeah
00:23:14
okay so maybe we can pivot discussion
00:23:17
here to I I will say let me make one
00:23:19
other point here delving into the
00:23:21
internal politics of another country is
00:23:23
not something that we typically like to
00:23:25
do or that Americans are particularly
00:23:27
good at but when a situation like this
00:23:29
happens that could drag us into a war we
00:23:33
do have to kind of understand the
00:23:34
internal dynamics of these countries
00:23:36
Israel is a country that for the last
00:23:38
several years has been very internally
00:23:40
divided there's been something like five
00:23:43
elections in the last four
00:23:45
years
00:23:46
Netanyahu got reelected in December of
00:23:51
2022 by creating a new Coalition with
00:23:54
farri elements of the Israeli political
00:23:57
system
00:23:58
and jamath you mentioned the alaxa
00:24:00
mosque and I and I know Jared's take on
00:24:04
on this was he thought that this was
00:24:06
blown out of proportion but I'll give
00:24:08
you a different perspective on this I've
00:24:10
just been researching this if you read
00:24:12
Al jazer what they point to is a the
00:24:16
emergence of a far-right figure named
00:24:19
immar Ben gavier who has become a member
00:24:24
of netanyahu's government as a result of
00:24:26
this Coalition that was forged in
00:24:29
December and benir has been he
00:24:32
previously he was a a fringe sort of
00:24:35
anti- Palestinian far-right provocator
00:24:38
when he was 19 years old he basically
00:24:40
had somehow stolen or taken the hood
00:24:42
ornament from Yak rine the then prime
00:24:45
minister's car and was waving it around
00:24:48
saying that if we can get to your car we
00:24:49
can get to you three weeks later Yak
00:24:52
bbin was assassinated by a far-right
00:24:55
religious extremist in is Israel because
00:24:58
they felt that he had committed treason
00:25:00
by signing the oso Accords now benav
00:25:02
wasn't implicated himself but it gives
00:25:04
you a sense of kind of where he's coming
00:25:07
from and benav has led over the past
00:25:09
year several incursions into the AL oxa
00:25:13
mosque area and the reason he said he's
00:25:17
done this is to
00:25:18
show that the AL oxa mosque and the do
00:25:21
of the rock near the Haram al- Sharif
00:25:24
which is the third holiest site in Islam
00:25:26
after Mecca Medina he says that that is
00:25:29
under the sovereignty of Israel that
00:25:31
that belongs to Israel there is also a
00:25:33
faction of the Israeli far right that
00:25:35
wants to build the Third Temple on the
00:25:37
Temple Mount you have to understand that
00:25:39
that cannot happen while the alox of
00:25:42
mosque is still there so you have these
00:25:45
I don't mind saying phrases I mean to to
00:25:48
to destroy or even to imply that you
00:25:52
would ever destroy the aloa mosque is
00:25:55
such an explosive issue it would turn
00:25:57
the entire Muslim World against Israel
00:25:58
and basically I think it would be the
00:25:59
end of Israel but you have these figures
00:26:03
who've now been incorporated into
00:26:05
netanyahu's cabinet and I they are I
00:26:08
think far to the right of Netanyahu but
00:26:10
they are pressuring Netanyahu they are
00:26:12
seem to be banging for some sort of
00:26:14
religious War so you know the domestic
00:26:17
politics of another country is not
00:26:18
something that we're totally familiar
00:26:19
with but you have to understand that
00:26:20
Israel does have these elements and man
00:26:24
I hope that the Biden
00:26:25
Administration is telling Netanyahu that
00:26:30
yeah we stand with Israel but not if
00:26:33
you're going to follow the advice of
00:26:35
these far-right religious extremists
00:26:37
this is um I think a very important
00:26:39
point to to pause on here and maybe
00:26:41
unpack which is uh as I said I'm I'm
00:26:45
here in Dubai and had this trip planned
00:26:48
and um actually tell us what you're what
00:26:50
you're hearing what are you hearing what
00:26:52
do they what do people say yeah it's
00:26:54
fascinating um and it's this is going to
00:26:57
get a little touch
00:26:58
and so I just want to be clear I'm going
00:27:00
to tell people what the conversations
00:27:02
are here it's not necessarily me
00:27:04
endorsing any of these positions and
00:27:07
again I'm no expert of course and on
00:27:09
Saturday night I went to abot Mitzvah my
00:27:11
friends um daughters had their bot
00:27:13
Mitzvah and uh and Tuesday night I had
00:27:16
dinner sorry Where in Israel or no in
00:27:18
the Bay Area and then flew here and the
00:27:21
struck a position where I had dinner
00:27:23
last night with five Jordans who are of
00:27:27
pal Ian descent uh
00:27:29
and they universally are appalled by
00:27:33
Hamas and they're what happened right so
00:27:37
just say that right out
00:27:39
front and then they are perplexed why
00:27:42
there is no discussion in the West in
00:27:44
America of the conditions that could
00:27:48
have led to this and the treatment of
00:27:50
the Palestinian people who they believe
00:27:51
are living in apartheid and that word is
00:27:55
used over and over again and that they
00:27:57
have you know now a generation of people
00:27:59
who have no hope and a generation of
00:28:02
people who have nothing to lose and that
00:28:04
they they have nothing to live for and
00:28:06
this is uh the piece of the discussion
00:28:08
that has gotten a lot of people in the
00:28:10
west I think in trouble talking about it
00:28:12
we had a conference producer who uh was
00:28:15
tweeting Hey listen you know very early
00:28:18
on like on the on
00:28:20
107 Israel has to abide by you know
00:28:24
international law Etc and and this came
00:28:26
up over and over again
00:28:28
from Muslims here in Dubai that the West
00:28:33
is not and in the Free World is not
00:28:34
holding Israel accountable to Human
00:28:38
Rights standards basic standard tenants
00:28:39
of war and I was coming into the trip a
00:28:42
little bit more positive and now there's
00:28:45
such a deep hurt on both sides of this
00:28:47
that I I got to see you know from from
00:28:50
both of these events and people
00:28:51
suffering that I um my normally positive
00:28:56
outlook has been a little bit shaken if
00:28:58
I'm being honest this feels very
00:29:00
intractable to
00:29:02
me and uh yeah to even going near the
00:29:06
topic of what has Israel contributed to
00:29:10
this situation and in the treatment of
00:29:12
the Palestinian people that's what the
00:29:14
people in the region want to hear us
00:29:17
talk about or just hear the world talk
00:29:19
about any reaction to some of the
00:29:22
protests that happened in Europe and the
00:29:24
people that took to the streets what
00:29:25
what was their perspective on that I
00:29:27
think perspective is a very small
00:29:29
percentage of Americans care about the
00:29:31
Palestinian people and you know if you
00:29:33
look at the surveys that have gone on
00:29:36
and I have some of the the survey
00:29:39
data that's been done and I'm not sure
00:29:41
Americans views on this are the most
00:29:44
important views for us to be focused on
00:29:46
but a very small percentage of people
00:29:48
are aligned um with the Palestinian
00:29:52
people as opposed to with the state of
00:29:54
Israel so well I mean the biggest
00:29:55
challenge in finding a
00:30:00
towards I don't want to just be so
00:30:02
generic and say the word peace no I
00:30:04
think that's the word yeah but towards
00:30:06
some form of understanding and
00:30:07
settlement with with each other is that
00:30:09
there's a framing right now that you
00:30:11
have to pick a
00:30:12
side you're not allowed to be pro-israel
00:30:17
and also be sympathetic and empathetic
00:30:19
to the plight of the children in Gaza
00:30:22
you're not
00:30:23
allowed to say I'm looking out for the
00:30:26
Palestinians but I believe Israel should
00:30:28
have a state you're not allowed to point
00:30:30
out the fact that there are multiple
00:30:33
Muslim majority countries and there's
00:30:36
only one Jewish State while also saying
00:30:40
that what the Israelis have done may
00:30:42
also not be right you're not allowed to
00:30:47
take a nuanced point of view and you're
00:30:48
not allowed to address the variance in
00:30:52
Behavior over time with each of these
00:30:54
different sides and how there is a
00:30:56
massive complicated mess here that it
00:30:59
has to be pick your side you're
00:31:01
pro-israeli we need to wipe out X Y or Z
00:31:05
or you're anti-israeli and as a result
00:31:07
you're
00:31:08
anti-semite and the fact that we
00:31:10
conflate all of these things together
00:31:13
and force people to jump on a side is
00:31:14
what is also escalating that we can't
00:31:16
actually have conversations around these
00:31:18
topics that it all ends up being pick
00:31:20
aide and then let's figure out how many
00:31:23
people and what resources are on one
00:31:25
side and what people and what resources
00:31:26
are on the other
00:31:28
and I think that this notion that we
00:31:29
have almost a cancel culture Behavior
00:31:32
that's now leeched into this
00:31:35
discourse that if you try and talk about
00:31:38
the plight of
00:31:39
Palestinians you cannot also be
00:31:42
pro-israel is what's keeping us from
00:31:44
making progress in finding a path to
00:31:46
resolution and I I think that's the the
00:31:48
biggest issue right now and we Leverage
00:31:51
The you're not a
00:31:52
loyalist you're not moral you're not a
00:31:56
good person you're evil if you don't
00:32:01
stand on our side and both sides are act
00:32:04
that
00:32:05
way and it's that's the hardest thing to
00:32:08
change it's I think the only way to find
00:32:11
a path is to change that first and I
00:32:14
think starting with empathy is the only
00:32:16
way but man that's impossible right now
00:32:18
[ __ ] impossible yeah it's hard sorry
00:32:20
now I'm sorry I'm just I'm just super
00:32:22
like w I'm super emotional about this
00:32:23
because I just don't like the like you
00:32:25
know so there are broadly speaking two
00:32:30
factions that we're seeing out in the
00:32:33
streets either denouncing Israel or
00:32:35
supporting the Palestinians I think
00:32:36
there is a group of people who genuinely
00:32:39
hate Jews or hate Israel and do not
00:32:41
believe in Israel's right to exist and
00:32:44
are preaching things like decolonization
00:32:46
which is a recipe for for genocide then
00:32:49
there are people and probably a larger
00:32:52
group who I think are concerned with the
00:32:54
plight of the Palestinian people who
00:32:56
recognize the conditions they have is
00:32:58
deplorable and that the tactics that
00:33:01
Israel uses to enforce its security
00:33:04
whether it's the occupation of the West
00:33:06
Bank or the blockade of Gaza are
00:33:09
unsustainable and create unfair
00:33:12
conditions for the Palestinians so in
00:33:14
other words they're not saying that
00:33:16
Israel doesn't have a right to exist
00:33:17
they are principally concerned with
00:33:20
helping the Palestinians in achieving a
00:33:22
Palestinian state it seems to me of
00:33:24
Paramount importance that Israel
00:33:28
separate these two
00:33:30
groups by understanding the concern and
00:33:33
I would apply this to American
00:33:34
leadership as well by understanding the
00:33:37
concerns of the latter and hopefully
00:33:40
getting us on a path to resolving them
00:33:43
totally so as to isolate the haters
00:33:46
totally because otherwise this whole
00:33:48
thing is headed towards a gigantic
00:33:50
disaster where and I I think it's a
00:33:52
disaster for for Israel most of all is
00:33:54
that Israel could be destroyed but I
00:33:56
think think the whole world is being
00:33:57
asked to pick a side too and that's
00:33:59
where this escalates into a much bigger
00:34:01
broader conflict it's it's that yeah and
00:34:04
the country and even within the us we're
00:34:06
being asked to pick a side and now we're
00:34:07
seeing civil unrest in the US the
00:34:09
frustration as well amongst people who
00:34:12
are of who who are Muslim or who are
00:34:15
Palestinian descent or Jordanian or just
00:34:17
in the region generally is that Hamas
00:34:20
set this process back decades and
00:34:22
there's like a great frustration that
00:34:24
maybe some progress was being made and
00:34:26
that we could come to some normaly in a
00:34:28
two-state solution and that Hamas did
00:34:31
this exactly
00:34:33
because so much progress has been made
00:34:36
uh recently I think that is the best
00:34:38
theory about why this happened now is
00:34:40
that there was a process of
00:34:41
normalization happening between Israel
00:34:44
and a number of these Arab states and
00:34:46
and we talked about it last week that
00:34:47
jerro Kushner set this in motion there
00:34:49
were three or four deals that were
00:34:51
signed between Israel and the gulf Arab
00:34:53
states uh bringing about normal
00:34:56
relations and Saudi Arabia was on the
00:34:58
table as being the next one there was a
00:35:01
effort underway to negotiate a
00:35:03
normalization of of relations between
00:35:06
Israel and and Saudi Arabia that is now
00:35:09
completely on ice and at risk of the
00:35:12
other agreements maybe being ripped up
00:35:14
because if Israel goes in and has a
00:35:17
massive ground Invasion and there's more
00:35:19
suffering and death that that will maybe
00:35:22
blow all those Accords up I think that
00:35:24
what Hamas may have been concerned about
00:35:27
extent you want to impute strategic
00:35:28
logic to their decisions even you know
00:35:31
those decisions are atrocities but if
00:35:33
they have a strategic purpose in mind
00:35:35
it's to derail yeah that that process of
00:35:38
normalization because if the entire Arab
00:35:40
world basically normalizes relations
00:35:41
with Israel before the Palestinian
00:35:43
question is resolved it takes a major
00:35:47
carrot off the table in their
00:35:49
negotiations or whatever they want to
00:35:51
achieve so I think that to thwart that
00:35:54
process was a big part of the goal here
00:35:58
but I do think that what this has shown
00:36:01
is that getting to a larger Middle East
00:36:04
piece without resolving the Palestinian
00:36:07
question is likely to be a failed
00:36:09
strategy I just don't it's impossible
00:36:11
it's impossible and so
00:36:13
impossible again this does not justify
00:36:15
anything Hamas did but I think that what
00:36:17
these events have now created is a
00:36:20
dynamic where the Palestinian question
00:36:25
is now front and center and and
00:36:26
everything else is basically paused
00:36:29
until this gets resolved now I just want
00:36:32
to say something about the two-state
00:36:33
process you know again I was doing some
00:36:35
some research there really hasn't been
00:36:37
any work on the two-state solution for
00:36:40
roughly a decade Obama was the last
00:36:43
president who tried he explicitly said
00:36:45
that Israel should try to make peace
00:36:47
based on the 1967 lines but with land
00:36:49
swaps to accommodate for the changes
00:36:52
that have happened on the map since then
00:36:54
Netanyahu was very high rate at that
00:36:56
formulation by by the way he never had a
00:36:57
good relationship with with Obama
00:36:59
because of that and then John KY who
00:37:02
secretary under State under Obama made a
00:37:04
major effort to try and bring about a
00:37:06
two-state solution and frankly it went
00:37:08
nowhere and a big part of the reason why
00:37:11
is that Netanyahu said that listen the
00:37:15
only situation that's acceptable to
00:37:18
Israel from a security standpoint is
00:37:20
that we must control all security west
00:37:23
of the Jordan River so in other words we
00:37:25
must control security in the West Bank
00:37:27
and his argument was that look adjacent
00:37:30
land is very important if you create a
00:37:32
Palestinian State there where they have
00:37:34
total sovereignty over their own
00:37:36
security they could be digging tunnels
00:37:38
under the wall he basically said it
00:37:39
could turn into 20 gazes and he's got
00:37:42
his point of view and and when people
00:37:44
challenged him on this he said listen
00:37:45
you don't live here you know we live
00:37:47
here we understand the security
00:37:48
situation that's what he said to John
00:37:50
Cary so the whole process fell apart and
00:37:53
since then the idea has been for Israel
00:37:56
to move forward again on this larger
00:37:58
normalization project with the rest of
00:38:00
the Middle East putting the Palestinian
00:38:03
question to one side the idea has
00:38:05
basically been listen if you won't make
00:38:06
peace with us and this goes back to
00:38:08
Arafat at Camp David turning down the
00:38:11
deal that was on the table that Clinton
00:38:13
brokered with Ood Barack if you won't
00:38:16
make a deal with us we'll just go around
00:38:18
you you're too rejectionist you're too
00:38:20
difficult you're too hard to make a deal
00:38:21
with so we're just going to put that to
00:38:23
one side and that really has been the
00:38:26
process
00:38:27
for the last decade I would say since
00:38:30
John K's initiative fell apart the
00:38:33
process has been starting with kushan
00:38:36
under Trump and then I think Biden tried
00:38:38
to extend it by brokering the Saudi
00:38:40
Arabia deal the idea was let's put the
00:38:43
Palestinian question to one side we'll
00:38:45
work on these other deals I think now
00:38:47
that that process has fallen apart so
00:38:50
the two-state solution that process died
00:38:52
back in
00:38:53
2014 this idea of going around has
00:38:56
basically falling apart now and so I
00:38:58
think this is why people are pretty
00:38:59
pessimistic about where things go from
00:39:01
here is what is the process and
00:39:04
meanwhile you have this hard shift
00:39:05
inside Israeli domestic politics to the
00:39:08
right you've got these religious
00:39:10
factions who believe that the entirety
00:39:13
of the West Bank what they call Judea
00:39:15
and Samaria is their god-given right and
00:39:18
if you go back to the netanyahu's
00:39:19
government forming in December of 2022
00:39:23
the first plank was to say that Judea
00:39:27
and Samaria belong to us we have
00:39:28
sovereignty over them we're not giving
00:39:30
them up so what room is there for
00:39:32
compromise and since then they've been
00:39:33
expanding the settlements in the West
00:39:35
Bank let me ask you a question just to
00:39:37
shift the question for a second the
00:39:39
thing that surprised me the most over
00:39:43
this past week
00:39:45
were the extent of the
00:39:48
protests some
00:39:51
violent in the United States and in
00:39:54
Western Europe and I'm curious to hear
00:39:56
from you guys was that overwhelmingly
00:39:58
about Pro Palestine and making sure that
00:40:01
there wasn't a human rights atrocity in
00:40:04
Gaza or was that a emergence of like a
00:40:10
simmering anti-Semitism that we hadn't
00:40:12
seen well both that that's kind of my
00:40:14
point is there's type one and type two
00:40:16
type one is the true hatred it's the
00:40:19
denial of the Israeli right to exist
00:40:21
however there's a type two which is
00:40:23
legitimate concern over the condition of
00:40:25
the Palestinians and the desire to
00:40:27
resolve that by creating a Palestinian
00:40:29
State and until you separate those two
00:40:31
things you're never going to make
00:40:32
progress your type two can breed a type
00:40:35
one is the real scary reality the
00:40:38
simmering
00:40:39
anti-Semitism that you can have a
00:40:42
legitimate concern about the people of
00:40:44
Palestine because you always are going
00:40:46
to be concerned about the oppressed
00:40:48
being oppressed by the oppressor and
00:40:52
that then translates into an
00:40:54
anti-Semitism because you say that it's
00:40:56
the Jewish people that are perpetrating
00:40:58
this upon those people therefore the
00:41:01
Jewish people need to go and I've heard
00:41:04
friends of mine in the last week who
00:41:06
have said awful things like all Muslims
00:41:08
need to go well-known well-respected
00:41:11
public people have said this to me in
00:41:13
private I can see where the hatred can
00:41:16
come from a place of hurt I can see that
00:41:19
when people feel sympathetic towards the
00:41:21
Palestinian plight they can then turn
00:41:23
into
00:41:24
anti-Semitism and so I I I do think that
00:41:27
there are two distinct groups today but
00:41:29
my concern is that just like what
00:41:30
happened in the past that that can then
00:41:33
breed into a more generalized more fiery
00:41:37
and more scary situation where it really
00:41:40
is anti something genocidal on both
00:41:45
sides by the way I think what we're
00:41:46
describing here is a classic vicious
00:41:49
cycle where you start with there's
00:41:52
conditions of occupation that breeds
00:41:54
resistance that breeds
00:41:57
extremism extremism breeds fear on the
00:42:00
part of Israelis because they get
00:42:02
attacked and then that breeds harsher
00:42:04
security conditions the next level of
00:42:06
occupation or blockade and then that the
00:42:09
C yeah and so the the question is how
00:42:12
you break that cycle because the
00:42:14
Israelis right now and I'm I'm sure
00:42:16
netan would make this point if we open
00:42:18
things up if we gave you a Palestinian
00:42:20
State what's to stop 30,000 Hamas
00:42:23
Fighters if we opened up the walls
00:42:25
around Gaza what's to stop 30,000 Hamas
00:42:29
fighters from Ming us in our homes and
00:42:32
if you do a ground
00:42:34
Invasion are you inspiring more
00:42:38
radicalization and so for every person
00:42:41
you kill they've got Brothers they've
00:42:42
got sisters they've got parents they've
00:42:44
got kids they've got aunts and uncles
00:42:47
and they become the next generation of
00:42:49
extremists how does the cycle break I
00:42:51
think is the frustrating part here and
00:42:55
just
00:42:56
looking at the reaction in the US um we
00:43:00
saw a lot of discussion
00:43:04
over young students writing arguments
00:43:07
that Israel had brought this on
00:43:09
themselves and were solely responsible
00:43:10
for the Hamas attack um and this has led
00:43:13
to a massive outrage amongst donors to
00:43:18
uh Ivy League schools like Penn and
00:43:21
Harvard and obviously those have very
00:43:24
large endowments and and this is now I
00:43:28
leading to many of them pulling out of
00:43:32
commitments they've made um the Wexner
00:43:35
Foundation founded by Victoria Secrets
00:43:38
billionaire said it's breaking off ties
00:43:40
with
00:43:41
Harvard Edon ofur quit the Executive
00:43:44
Board of Harvard's Kennedy School
00:43:45
citadels Ken Griffin uh who's donated
00:43:48
more than half a billion dollars to
00:43:49
Harvard plac a call week last week to
00:43:51
the head of Harvard and asked the
00:43:53
university to come out in support of
00:43:55
Israel and then more than a dozen
00:43:57
Anonymous donors told the New York Times
00:43:59
they felt they had a right and an
00:44:00
obligation to to weigh in here and
00:44:02
before this all happened at Penn donors
00:44:05
had started pulling out because of a
00:44:07
Palestinian rights Festival that
00:44:10
happened two weeks before the events of
00:44:13
107 from September 22nd to 24th upan
00:44:16
hosted the Palestine rights literature
00:44:18
Festival the festival was buil as a
00:44:20
gathering to explore the richness and
00:44:22
diversity of Palestinian culture but
00:44:24
according to multiple sources in mostly
00:44:26
focused on Jews Israel and Zionism one
00:44:29
speaker called for ethnic cleansing of
00:44:31
Jews another said violence was a
00:44:33
necessity any thoughts chath we were
00:44:35
talking last week about these woke
00:44:36
madrasas and then I guess this is the
00:44:38
second order and third order effects
00:44:40
coming into play if you said it more
00:44:43
generically this would be a perfect
00:44:45
opportunity for these leading
00:44:46
universities to actually provide nuance
00:44:49
and teach
00:44:51
people the history of both sides and to
00:44:54
show
00:44:57
the perspective of both sides that would
00:44:59
take leadership yeah it would take
00:45:01
courageous leadership on the part of the
00:45:02
people who run the university let's just
00:45:05
be honest I think these Elite
00:45:06
universities are essentially asset
00:45:09
management
00:45:10
businesses that have an education the
00:45:13
Fig Leaf of Education wrapped around
00:45:15
them so they're more like Black Rock
00:45:17
than they are like a school and so they
00:45:20
behave like any for-profit asset manager
00:45:23
would which is that I think that as they
00:45:25
didn't try to intervene in one way or
00:45:28
the other over the last 15 or 20
00:45:31
years in actually making sure that they
00:45:34
were graduating the best kids so instead
00:45:37
what happened is they get hijacked
00:45:39
by professors and people who wanted one
00:45:43
very specific strain of thinking and I
00:45:45
don't think it matters which strain it
00:45:46
is but it betrays what the point of a
00:45:49
leading University is supposed to be and
00:45:51
then as a result the people that
00:45:52
graduate from these places are
00:45:54
close-minded and what that does is that
00:45:56
that screws America because you have all
00:45:59
of these other places graduating kids
00:46:02
with a different mindset who then go and
00:46:04
build the things that matter and America
00:46:06
just keeps falling back and we are just
00:46:09
slower and we are not intellectually
00:46:12
capable of thinking in a way that allows
00:46:14
us to see more than just what's right in
00:46:16
front of us so I don't know what you
00:46:18
want me to say it's it's just like these
00:46:20
no I'm just it's a followup to what we
00:46:23
talked about last week and so I I
00:46:25
thought was pertinent Sachs uh looking
00:46:28
at the Free Speech issue there was some
00:46:31
push back online again not my position
00:46:34
I'm just putting it out here for you to
00:46:35
comment on saxs which is
00:46:38
blacklisting young college students who
00:46:41
had an opinion about Palestine is wrong
00:46:44
and you're trying to cancel people
00:46:47
what's your response to holding people
00:46:49
accountable or cancelling these students
00:46:51
uh for their positions on the Israeli
00:46:54
Palestinian conflict well what's
00:46:56
happening now is that these campuses
00:46:59
that took outrageous positions on this
00:47:03
whole issue are now trying to wrap
00:47:05
themselves in the cloak of academic
00:47:06
freedom as if that's a value they've
00:47:08
been respecting free speech is not a
00:47:10
value they've been respecting free
00:47:11
speech is a value they've been imposing
00:47:13
and this was uh revealed by a survey
00:47:16
that was just done the fire survey that
00:47:20
surveyed students on 248 campuses on a
00:47:23
range of free speech issues so it ask
00:47:26
them about how comfortable do you feel
00:47:29
expressing your views on controversial
00:47:31
topics what is the Tolerance on campus
00:47:35
for Liberal speakers or conservative
00:47:37
speakers how acceptable is it to engage
00:47:39
in disruptive conduct against a speaker
00:47:42
on campus such as shouting them down to
00:47:44
prevent them from speaking what sort of
00:47:47
administrative support do different
00:47:48
views get on campus and how open is the
00:47:51
campus to hearing about different issues
00:47:54
and what they found was that the most
00:47:56
elite schools ranked the worst the only
00:48:00
elite private school to score above
00:48:03
average on Free Speech was University of
00:48:05
Chicago which got a score of about 65
00:48:07
out of 100 which made them rank number
00:48:10
13
00:48:11
overall the rest of the top schools the
00:48:14
IVs were abysmal Brown ranked number 69
00:48:18
Duke ranked 124 Princeton ranked 187
00:48:22
Stanford ranked 207 this is again out of
00:48:25
a total number of uh
00:48:28
248 and Penn which is where the donors
00:48:32
are up and armed ranked second to last
00:48:35
number two uh 247 they scored uh 11
00:48:38
points on the survey and then Harvard
00:48:41
finished 248 out of 248 schools ranked
00:48:44
also known as also known as dead last
00:48:47
and get this the rating in the survey
00:48:49
was 0.0 they scored a blue tarski
00:48:54
0.0 bluei in Animal House he scored
00:48:59
0.0 Harvard SC
00:49:02
0.0 Z
00:49:04
yes so so look I think it would be it
00:49:08
would be one thing if these schools said
00:49:10
to the alumni we agree with you that
00:49:13
some of these speakers were over the
00:49:15
toop but this is what academic freedom
00:49:17
is all about but they have no standing
00:49:20
to say anything like that because they
00:49:22
have been suppressing views on campus
00:49:26
speakers to be sh down they have been
00:49:28
stifling the presentation of alternative
00:49:30
views so this is
00:49:32
clearly these types of speakers these
00:49:34
types of views that I think absolutely
00:49:36
cross the line from again what we talked
00:49:38
about which is type two support for
00:49:41
legitimate support for a Palestinian
00:49:42
State into hatred of Israel and Jews and
00:49:46
denying the right to exist it absolutely
00:49:48
crossed over and many of these cases was
00:49:50
a outrageous talk given by I think a
00:49:53
Cornell professor who was was outright
00:49:56
praising this Massacre Oh God that was
00:49:59
disturbing so look it ised Cas yes he
00:50:03
was excited yeah so look I I think that
00:50:07
these alumni have a point in saying that
00:50:11
you these Elite campuses have been
00:50:13
clearly putting your thumb on the scale
00:50:15
in favor of certain views you've been
00:50:17
suppressing certain views so this must
00:50:19
be of you that you either share or
00:50:23
endorse or permit give that the rest of
00:50:26
your speech regime is so restrictive and
00:50:28
oppressive so even though I would in a
00:50:31
different circumstance support academic
00:50:33
freedom I don't think these colleges
00:50:35
have a leg to stand on all right we're
00:50:37
going to talk about some other topics
00:50:39
today because that's what we do on the
00:50:41
all-in podcast and so tangentially
00:50:44
related to the speech issues in the EU
00:50:47
officials held a meeting to discuss
00:50:49
enforcement of the DSA or Digital
00:50:52
Services act uh for some background here
00:50:54
the eu's digital Serv Service Act
00:50:56
updated the eu's electronic Commerce
00:50:58
directive of 2000 which was inspired by
00:51:02
section 230 here in the US common
00:51:04
carrier laws uh where the common
00:51:06
carriers be those AOL Yahoo Google
00:51:09
Facebook are not responsible for what
00:51:12
individuals post on their platforms and
00:51:14
so that protection's been critically
00:51:16
important not making social media sites
00:51:19
or WordPress into editors or having them
00:51:22
have to
00:51:23
censor content on their platform so the
00:51:26
DSA officially went into effect in
00:51:28
August of this year the main goal was to
00:51:31
quote unquote Foster safer online
00:51:33
environments the DSA aims to do that via
00:51:36
tighter rules around
00:51:37
disinformation illegal content and
00:51:41
transparent advertising those last two
00:51:43
not controversial that first one
00:51:45
disinformation is obviously the one
00:51:47
that's going to be pretty uh challenging
00:51:49
the DSA has been called a new
00:51:51
constitution of the internet and an
00:51:53
effort to shape the future of the online
00:51:55
online World some things the
00:51:57
DSA covers it forces
00:52:01
vops a new term very large online
00:52:04
platforms disclose how their algorithms
00:52:06
work they must give users the right to
00:52:08
opt out of recommendation systems and
00:52:10
profiling they must share key data with
00:52:12
researchers and authorities they must
00:52:14
cooperate with crisis response
00:52:16
requirements and they must perform
00:52:17
external and internal audits they want
00:52:19
to force transparency on how content
00:52:22
moderation decisions are made that seems
00:52:24
logical they want to force transparency
00:52:27
uh on the ways advertising is targeted
00:52:28
that also seems
00:52:30
reasonable and then they want ways to
00:52:32
flag illegal content obviously
00:52:35
obligations uh around uh protecting
00:52:37
minors I don't think anybody will debate
00:52:40
those but it forces them to cooperate
00:52:42
with specialized trusted flaggers to
00:52:44
identify and remove this illegal content
00:52:46
I don't know who those people would be
00:52:49
freeberg you had some thoughts my
00:52:50
thoughts are that the era of the open
00:52:54
internet
00:52:55
as a decentralized technology platform
00:52:58
for the benefit of
00:53:01
individuals and not to be overseen and
00:53:03
run by governments is over the Digital
00:53:06
Services act I think is one of the most
00:53:11
overreaching threats to any sort of open
00:53:15
transparent
00:53:17
Democratic opportunity on the internet
00:53:20
the idea of the open internet the idea
00:53:23
of creating a network of Compu
00:53:26
that could share information and make
00:53:28
services available to individuals around
00:53:30
the world freely
00:53:34
uncensored and in an easy to access way
00:53:38
was the reason that the internet has
00:53:39
transformed Society improved
00:53:42
productivity and provided extraordinary
00:53:45
benefits the Digital Services Act is an
00:53:48
example of a government seeing that a
00:53:52
decentralized technology the internet
00:53:54
itself is is meant to be a decentralized
00:53:56
technology there's no Central servers
00:53:58
they are all part of a network of
00:54:01
computers that anyone on the network can
00:54:02
access anything else on the network
00:54:04
blockchain obviously is the more modern
00:54:06
kind of exciting you know decentralized
00:54:09
technology concept that is meant to
00:54:12
avoid the scrutiny the oversight and the
00:54:14
control by Central governments or or
00:54:17
Central authorities of any
00:54:19
sort and the language in the Digital
00:54:22
Services act I think got squeezed
00:54:24
through in a way that most of the people
00:54:26
that I'm guessing passed this Digital
00:54:27
Services act don't fully comprehend the
00:54:30
implications of some of the decisions
00:54:31
that they're making it can be easily
00:54:33
framed as this is good for people you
00:54:36
cannot sell illegal content online you
00:54:38
cannot sell illegal goods and services
00:54:41
we're trying to safeguard young people
00:54:43
but the protection of minors means that
00:54:46
you can no longer do personalized web
00:54:49
experiences for anyone under 18 which
00:54:51
means you need to know the age of
00:54:52
everyone and now your web experience if
00:54:54
you're a kid is not going to be
00:54:55
personalized the overreach gets even
00:54:58
worse when they say we can now go in and
00:55:01
run
00:55:02
evaluations of the algorithms and allow
00:55:06
open access to your data to thirdparty
00:55:09
researchers to get into your systems and
00:55:11
look at how you guys are running the
00:55:12
services that you're offering on the
00:55:13
internet so not only are you no longer
00:55:15
allowed to have an open internet where
00:55:17
people can provide whatever Services
00:55:18
they want to provide but if you're on
00:55:20
the internet you now have to make your
00:55:22
service and the inside part of your
00:55:24
service available
00:55:25
foru by governments and so you have and
00:55:28
researchers who are these researchers
00:55:30
sounds like a stazzy type the way it's
00:55:32
written it gives this commission as the
00:55:35
primary regulator effectively a lot of
00:55:37
leeway in deciding who what where and
00:55:40
how they can go into companies go into
00:55:43
individual servers individual computers
00:55:46
I could run an individual company on my
00:55:48
computer at home and it gives this
00:55:50
government the legal right in the EU to
00:55:52
go into my computer and pull information
00:55:54
out of of my computer and scrutinize it
00:55:56
and make decisions about what I'm doing
00:55:58
and whether or not I'm compliant with
00:56:00
whatever the commission's enforcement
00:56:02
standards are of that day I mean this is
00:56:04
about as 1984 as you can get and it's a
00:56:07
real serious threat I don't think people
00:56:09
are recognizing the second and third
00:56:11
order effects of what this is going to
00:56:12
do over time to internet services to the
00:56:15
quality of experience we get on the
00:56:16
internet and to the role that government
00:56:19
is now going to play in policing
00:56:21
scrutinizing and providing restricted
00:56:23
access to content and service for each
00:56:25
individual that wants to use the
00:56:26
internet but it's important to say if
00:56:28
you're a European it'll just make Europe
00:56:30
even more of a place you go to vacation
00:56:31
and never to live yeah right I mean it's
00:56:34
not this we're not talking about America
00:56:36
right we're talking about Europe this is
00:56:37
all the changes that are going to happen
00:56:39
inside of Google which is going to
00:56:40
affect more than just the EU users
00:56:43
because of the requests and the demands
00:56:45
of the EU and so you know the the
00:56:47
services that you are going to get
00:56:49
around the world are going to be
00:56:50
affected by this EU compliance regime
00:56:52
and it's going to be dynamic it's a
00:56:53
commission basically a bunch of
00:56:55
individuals that get to decide who what
00:56:57
where and how that's right and that's
00:56:59
going to that's going to create a really
00:57:01
scary scary situation where a bunch of
00:57:05
people who are going to have their own
00:57:07
motivations their own political leanings
00:57:10
their own objectives they're going to be
00:57:12
able to leverage their particular role
00:57:16
in applying their particular biases to
00:57:18
internet services we saw Canada do
00:57:20
something similar and Facebook's
00:57:23
reaction and Facebook's reaction was
00:57:25
we're not going to Syndicate links so I
00:57:27
don't know I I would go back to another
00:57:29
argument you make a lot which is which I
00:57:31
agree with which is the free market will
00:57:33
act rationally here and if Google
00:57:36
deprecates a bunch of features and or
00:57:38
completely pulls out of Europe that'll
00:57:41
be the death Nowell for these kinds of
00:57:42
decisions because then other governments
00:57:45
and other people will see the cost of
00:57:47
trying to get this kind of control I
00:57:49
think the bigger issue in A Moment Like
00:57:51
This is Europe has such a checkered
00:57:55
passed on these things which is that
00:57:57
they somehow try to find this moral High
00:58:01
ground and there is just this
00:58:04
overreach and this quasi Central
00:58:06
planning that just never works and so if
00:58:09
this is another example of it I would
00:58:12
encourage all for-profit companies to
00:58:14
make the practical decision oh can you
00:58:16
imagine Google's decision making here
00:58:18
they've got thousands of employees in
00:58:20
Europe they make billions of dollars in
00:58:22
Revenue in the market it's such a
00:58:23
difficult situation to be in not if what
00:58:25
you're saying is true not if what you're
00:58:27
saying is this is the threat of the
00:58:28
internet I think it'll be very easy for
00:58:30
Larry and Sergey to say cut it move on
00:58:33
no I I Europe is too big a market for
00:58:35
Google or any other major tech company
00:58:37
to exit there's just no way what they're
00:58:39
going to do is comply there won't be a
00:58:40
market well hold on a second what this
00:58:42
new DSA rule does is apply penalties to
00:58:45
social networks for not censoring what
00:58:48
they call legal speech which is whatever
00:58:50
speech they say it is so freeberg is
00:58:53
right there's going to be some sort of
00:58:54
committee Brussels that basically sends
00:58:55
out takedown requests now to all these
00:58:58
social networks yeah it's the DSA
00:58:59
commission yeah the DSA commission so
00:59:01
yeah Europe again is just too big an
00:59:04
area not to serve and then what could
00:59:07
happen is that because it's easier for
00:59:08
companies just to have one approach
00:59:10
where they can there is a risk that
00:59:12
these same policies get applied in the
00:59:14
US that is what happened with privacy
00:59:16
remember Europe went first with gdpr and
00:59:19
then a lot of those regulations came to
00:59:21
America now the First Amendment May
00:59:23
stand in the way here but
00:59:25
there is some risk that tech companies
00:59:28
of their own accord decide that it's
00:59:30
cheaper and easier to comply with the
00:59:32
European regime everywhere than trying
00:59:34
to parse their service in different
00:59:35
markets I'm just saying that's a risk
00:59:37
but look let me frame it in a different
00:59:38
way in an economic argument okay
00:59:41
so Europe is about 25 cents of every
00:59:44
dollar of Revenue that Google generates
00:59:46
okay so if you think about that that's
00:59:50
call it 60 odd billion dollar a year
00:59:52
plus or minus okay so the the question
00:59:55
is at what point is the cost of trying
00:59:58
to get 60 billion so great that you say
01:00:01
it's not worth the 60 billion and my
01:00:05
point is that there there is an economic
01:00:07
rational argument here for it if it
01:00:11
costs for
01:00:12
example 10 or 20 billion dollars to
01:00:15
implement this stuff that's probably the
01:00:17
efficient Frontier where when you factor
01:00:19
in multiple compression and you factor
01:00:21
in Behavior change in Europe which may
01:00:23
actually degrade the 60 billion to 50 or
01:00:25
40 where you just throw your hands up
01:00:28
and say it's just not economically worth
01:00:29
it you've seen these actors make this
01:00:31
trade-off in Canada it's not totally
01:00:33
unreasonable that they run a model to
01:00:35
figure out the cost maybe they just take
01:00:37
the perspective that whenever this DSA
01:00:40
commission sends us a takedown request
01:00:41
we're just going to do it instantly why
01:00:43
wouldn't that just become the norm in
01:00:45
fact I'm pretty sure that's what they'll
01:00:46
do the management of most these
01:00:48
companies really at all of them except
01:00:50
for Elon they don't really care they
01:00:52
they have the same biases yeah they're
01:00:56
they don't care about free spe really
01:00:57
they're not Founders they don't care
01:00:58
about that Free Speech moreover they
01:01:00
have a lot of the same political biases
01:01:02
that these I'm not supporting the DSA
01:01:04
all I'm saying is I think that economic
01:01:06
rational actors will do the right thing
01:01:08
here I think the most likely outcome is
01:01:10
that tech companies will be craving and
01:01:12
they'll fold and they'll just do
01:01:13
whatever these EU Commissioners want
01:01:15
which then could be an opportunity for
01:01:17
you know distributed
01:01:19
blockchain you
01:01:20
know yeah I me it's hard to scale them
01:01:24
but
01:01:25
I the devil's in the details yeah or and
01:01:27
you guys feel this every day like Jason
01:01:29
you know you're right now in the UAE you
01:01:32
can communicate in certain ways through
01:01:34
WhatsApp you can't communicate in other
01:01:35
ways through iMessage there are just
01:01:37
rules of usability on products and they
01:01:40
exist all around the world if you go to
01:01:42
India there's certain apps that are
01:01:43
blocked and certain apps that are not
01:01:45
and so maybe that's just what happens
01:01:47
where there is just a gradient of user
01:01:49
experiences around the world for people
01:01:50
and we all deal with it yeah and we
01:01:52
don't know exactly how heavy-handed
01:01:55
they're going to be here this is by
01:01:56
definition heavy-handed I I don't agree
01:01:58
with it but hold on we don't know what
01:02:03
this is the problem with how they've
01:02:04
done this this is all being done in a
01:02:05
Star Chamber we don't have any insight
01:02:08
into what kind of content they want to
01:02:09
take down if it's obviously abusive
01:02:12
content fine but if it's you know coid
01:02:15
information or misinformation obviously
01:02:18
there's going to be a problem uh that we
01:02:19
saw here in the United States just so
01:02:21
people know resp yeah okay look them way
01:02:25
too much credit J Cal I'm not giving
01:02:27
them any credit I I do not want to see
01:02:29
this happen I'm not giving them any
01:02:31
credit I'm just saying we will see how
01:02:32
heavy-handed they'll be you're assuming
01:02:34
they're going to be super heavy-handed
01:02:36
we'll see and we'll see what their what
01:02:38
their own citizens respond I think the
01:02:40
fact that a room full of Commissioners
01:02:41
in the U can send takedown requests to
01:02:44
social media companies is by definition
01:02:46
heavy-handed let me back up what the
01:02:49
Twitter file showed okay is that we had
01:02:51
80 FBI agents being the conduit it for
01:02:54
takeown requests to Twitter and
01:02:56
presumably other social networks well no
01:02:58
no but that was all on the DL on the DL
01:03:00
exactly that was notw and yes moreover
01:03:04
when they did that in their takedown
01:03:06
requests they would always point to well
01:03:08
this tweet violates your terms of
01:03:10
service okay what the EU is doing is
01:03:13
different they're actually defining the
01:03:15
terms of service they're saying that
01:03:16
your terms of service need to do X Y and
01:03:19
Z they're doing it explicitly this is
01:03:21
not on the DL they're exp they're
01:03:25
to what we say it and when we you to
01:03:27
take something down you're going do it
01:03:30
they Haven defined what that is that's I
01:03:32
think the issue is where where is the
01:03:34
actual definition of what's going to
01:03:35
happen here and that's why it's hard for
01:03:36
us to have a discussion about this is
01:03:38
because we don't know what they're
01:03:39
talking about with this content that's
01:03:42
whatever they say in the future is
01:03:44
disinformation needs to be taken down
01:03:46
that's the framework the fine is going
01:03:48
to be up to 6% of global revenue for
01:03:51
companies that do not comply so the EU
01:03:54
has also figured out that speeding
01:03:57
tickets don't work and they're looking
01:03:59
to give pretty heavy penalties
01:04:01
so we'll see uh this is uh um a moving
01:04:06
Target here we don't have complete
01:04:07
information but yeah it's not a moving
01:04:10
Target we do have complete information
01:04:12
this is a censorship regime Jason we
01:04:14
just don't know what their term for
01:04:16
illegal or problematic content this year
01:04:19
and again I don't want I don't want to
01:04:21
be pitted as your adversary here I I am
01:04:23
not in of this so we're clear but and I
01:04:27
don't think there should be a Star
01:04:28
Chamber where people get to pick what
01:04:29
goes up and what goes down there I think
01:04:31
the private companies can do a good
01:04:33
enough job there and there should be
01:04:34
freedom of speech and yeah you're going
01:04:36
to see some things you don't like yeah
01:04:37
grow up turn change the T if you don't
01:04:39
like it it basically as they say sets a
01:04:42
horizontal rule covering all services
01:04:46
and all types of illegal content and
01:04:49
disinformation illegal content could be
01:04:51
fun right freeberg like illegal content
01:04:53
putting boxing somebody child
01:04:55
pornography illegal content I think we
01:04:57
would all be okay with it's the
01:04:58
disinformation part right I'm not trying
01:05:00
to be okay or not okay I'm just saying
01:05:01
that like you're basically saying that
01:05:03
whatever the rules are that they come up
01:05:05
with that may be different than
01:05:06
somewhere else on the internet they get
01:05:08
to then regulate other businesses on the
01:05:10
internet I think the internet should be
01:05:12
open well and there are I don't want to
01:05:14
have a commission approve what I write
01:05:16
in my blog post I don't want the
01:05:18
commission telling me that what I put on
01:05:20
Twitter or put on my website is up to
01:05:23
them to decide whether or not it's okay
01:05:25
to put up because they think it's
01:05:26
illegal because it has what they deem to
01:05:28
be
01:05:30
misinformation right ex already laws
01:05:32
that exist so disinformation illegal
01:05:34
content two different things but those
01:05:35
laws provide some authority to a
01:05:38
commissioner I mean that's the problem
01:05:39
right it's it's right look the problem
01:05:41
is in the vagueness of this the the law
01:05:44
says that social media companies have to
01:05:46
take down illegal content but it doesn't
01:05:47
say what a legal content is it delegates
01:05:50
the power to Define it to this group of
01:05:52
eurocrats led by Theory Bretton and
01:05:55
they're meeting this week to hammer it
01:05:56
out so yeah look in practice legal
01:06:00
content is going to be whatever they say
01:06:01
it is that is explicit censorship okay
01:06:05
let's move on to our final topic second
01:06:08
largest hype cycle of 2023 perhaps GOP
01:06:12
1es uh chamath you uh brought this up in
01:06:15
our group chat so maybe you could Tee It
01:06:16
Up well I was just interested in
01:06:21
understanding everything that's been
01:06:23
happening around GP
01:06:25
mostly because it just seems like people
01:06:27
think it's a
01:06:29
Panacea we have a lot of our friends
01:06:31
Jason you were the one that said this in
01:06:34
our poker group like four of the 12 or
01:06:38
13 regulars are on it is that right I
01:06:40
think it was four of like yeah four of
01:06:42
12 people were on it yeah it was a third
01:06:44
yeah and then and then I got this really
01:06:47
interesting chart Nick you may want to
01:06:49
put this up it basically
01:06:51
showed how the glp
01:06:54
One
01:06:56
Market was tracking very similar to the
01:06:59
AI market in terms of the hype which is
01:07:02
if you separated
01:07:04
companies as a basket of people who were
01:07:07
positively affected by gp1s like Lily
01:07:10
and Novo Nordisk and you had a basket of
01:07:14
companies that were disrupted by gp1s
01:07:16
those would be like Dexcom or Dita or
01:07:21
folks like that it eerily mimics the
01:07:23
same hype cycle around AI which is
01:07:26
there's those businesses that seem to be
01:07:27
feeding the hype train around Ai and
01:07:29
then all of these companies that
01:07:31
theoretically will be disrupted and it
01:07:33
just brought up to me that there's this
01:07:36
incredible market movement here where I
01:07:38
think people think that these gp1s
01:07:41
are a solution to everything and I
01:07:43
thought it was just an important thing
01:07:44
to discuss because
01:07:46
scientifically the mechanism of action
01:07:48
is still a little questionable and murky
01:07:50
on top of that I think we don't know
01:07:52
physiologically what the real long-term
01:07:53
ramifications of taking these things are
01:07:56
there's still a lot of mixed evidence
01:07:58
around the total amount of weight loss
01:08:00
you can lose the percentage of muscle
01:08:02
versus fat that you lose and so yeah I
01:08:04
just thought it was important for us to
01:08:06
talk about it and see what this would be
01:08:08
a a a baset spread trade here are the
01:08:11
companies that win here are the
01:08:12
companies that loses and look at that
01:08:14
gap between the two and it's exactly
01:08:16
mimics people who would benefit from Ai
01:08:19
and people would lose from AI yeah the
01:08:21
gp1 hype the summary is the gp1 hype
01:08:24
is as overextended as the AI hype cycle
01:08:30
so we should probably separate the weed
01:08:32
from the chaff and start by
01:08:33
understanding what gp1s are because I'm
01:08:36
sure there's a lot of people in our
01:08:37
listening Community who are on this
01:08:39
stuff they should really probably
01:08:41
understand well if that's where you
01:08:42
think we should go next we should then
01:08:45
throw it to the sultant of science
01:08:47
himself David freeberg explained to us
01:08:51
uh while we prepare our Uranus jokes GP
01:08:55
ones these drugs have been around for a
01:08:58
while they're small peptides little
01:09:00
proteins that bind to this glp receptor
01:09:04
in your gut that causes insulin to be
01:09:07
released from your pancreas and triggers
01:09:11
a couple of other hormones that reduce
01:09:14
your hunger and appetite so basically
01:09:16
gets you to eat less and your brain and
01:09:19
your brain and it's effectively a way to
01:09:21
make you feel not hungry and you you're
01:09:23
you can run a calorie deficit and when
01:09:25
you run a calorie deficit your body
01:09:27
starts starving
01:09:28
and starts burning other parts of your
01:09:31
body besides the the glucose it can get
01:09:34
out of the stomach where you would
01:09:35
otherwise have food and ends up in your
01:09:37
blood and it starts uh generating energy
01:09:40
from your stored body fat and your
01:09:42
stored and your muscle mass so these
01:09:44
have been around for a while Novo
01:09:46
Nordisk is the a developer of two of the
01:09:50
the main
01:09:51
drugs and here's a a chart of Nova
01:09:54
Nordisk stock price you can see that in
01:09:56
the
01:09:57
Last 5 Years their stock has 5x they've
01:10:00
basically gone from you know call it a
01:10:03
$60 billion company to a $350 billion
01:10:05
company in five years uh largely on the
01:10:09
the back of the promise of this drug so
01:10:10
these drugs have been around for a while
01:10:12
and there's actually one that's been on
01:10:13
the market for a long time but it only
01:10:14
causes 5% body mass loss so 5% weight
01:10:18
loss so people are like oh it's not that
01:10:19
great it didn't really get widely
01:10:20
adopted then this new class they added a
01:10:22
little side chain they added another
01:10:23
little molecule to the peptide and as a
01:10:26
result it didn't get degraded as fast
01:10:28
and it was far more bioactive in the
01:10:29
body and caused a much greater benefit
01:10:32
and so suddenly people on these drugs
01:10:33
started to see massive weight loss
01:10:35
massive Improvement diabetes and
01:10:36
metabolic Health all moves together so
01:10:38
as you burn body fat if you have less
01:10:40
glucose in your blood your your your
01:10:42
metabolic condition improves the problem
01:10:44
is when you're starving normally if you
01:10:46
were to just stop
01:10:48
eating you would typically see that your
01:10:50
body starts burning first of all the
01:10:52
glucose and then it burns off the the
01:10:53
glycogen in your muscles which is the
01:10:55
next energy store once that's gone your
01:10:57
body starts burning fat and as it's
01:10:59
burning more fat It also says hey I need
01:11:02
to get these other molecules which I'm
01:11:04
not getting just from the fat I need
01:11:05
muscle and your body actually starts
01:11:07
burning muscle and that's how your brain
01:11:09
gets energy that it needs when you're
01:11:10
starving is actually primarily from the
01:11:12
degradation of of muscle
01:11:15
tissue H so normally if you're just
01:11:17
starving yourself you'll see a ratio of
01:11:20
weight loss where it's about 20% coming
01:11:22
from lean muscle
01:11:24
mass in some of the studies that have
01:11:26
been done on these gp1 agonists we're
01:11:28
seeing up to 40% of the weight loss
01:11:31
coming from lean muscle mass uh being
01:11:34
burnt off so Jason I don't know if
01:11:36
you've done a dexa scan because I think
01:11:38
you you've said publicly that you've
01:11:39
tried it right I mean you should check
01:11:41
you should check out what your lean
01:11:42
muscle mass is versus um your fat
01:11:45
composition in your body I don't know if
01:11:46
you have it from before but I have yeah
01:11:50
yeah and this has been one of the
01:11:51
concerns obviously if you're not working
01:11:52
out and you're not you know doing what
01:11:54
you need to to eat protein and build
01:11:56
muscle you're going to be burning
01:11:57
through a lot of that muscle mass and so
01:11:59
that's problem number one that's Arisen
01:12:01
that that people are concerned about the
01:12:03
other one that's that's really I don't
01:12:05
know if it's concerning or not but when
01:12:06
people go off these drugs they gain the
01:12:10
weight back in a very quick way and
01:12:12
there's two reasons for this one is if
01:12:14
you haven't actually changed your
01:12:15
behavior you haven't changed your
01:12:16
exercise
01:12:17
patterns and and you suddenly have the
01:12:19
appetite suppressing drug taken out of
01:12:21
your system you start eating more food
01:12:23
again
01:12:24
and when you've been in a state of
01:12:26
starvation your metab your your
01:12:28
metabolism your Baseline metabolism goes
01:12:30
down so instead of burning on average
01:12:32
2,000 calories a day your body's only
01:12:34
burning at 1,200 calories a day so
01:12:36
suddenly if you go back to eating 2,000
01:12:38
calories a day because you're not you're
01:12:40
you know you no longer have the appetite
01:12:41
suppressor have you're going to
01:12:44
reinl and so so your metabolism goes
01:12:46
down the appetite suppressant goes away
01:12:48
and you gain all the weight back if you
01:12:50
haven't changed your behavior otherwise
01:12:52
and so I don't know if guys saw this
01:12:53
clip I sent out of Arnold Schwarz and
01:12:55
AER talking with Howard Stern but he was
01:12:57
talking about how like I can't do a
01:12:59
Howard accent Jal you could probably do
01:13:00
it really well but you know yeah one
01:13:02
thing you what do you think of the OIC
01:13:05
but you know how the OIC is you know
01:13:08
Americans used to be very interested in
01:13:10
working hard and I don't know why that's
01:13:12
so bad but you get up at 5:00 a.m. and
01:13:14
you work hard and you do it and you make
01:13:16
yourself strong right that's what it's
01:13:18
about you don't need to do a little baby
01:13:20
girl or Z Peck in your side oh look I'm
01:13:22
going to eat less food
01:13:25
thank you wait did you listen to the
01:13:27
clip is that is that what he said that's
01:13:28
what he said exactly what he said that's
01:13:31
exactly what he
01:13:32
Saida man make this
01:13:37
epic uh hard work that's why I say in in
01:13:42
my book you know work work your ass off
01:13:45
and because it's there's no shortcut
01:13:48
what built this country is it people
01:13:49
that SLE
01:13:51
in is it people that were wh
01:13:54
out I want to I want to be comfortable
01:13:57
no this were ballsy women and men that
01:14:00
went out there at 5: in the morning and
01:14:02
got up and they struggled and they
01:14:04
fought and they worked their butts off
01:14:07
that's what made this country great yeah
01:14:09
he he he actually he said that in
01:14:12
response to I think Howard st's
01:14:13
questions about OIC the problem like
01:14:16
like we're basically creating a new
01:14:19
multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical drug
01:14:22
system that people are going to have to
01:14:24
stay on in order to stay healthy do we
01:14:26
know what the long-term effects of
01:14:27
taking semaglutide are and can be and
01:14:30
will be I mean these drugs have been
01:14:33
around for quite a long time so you know
01:14:36
the there are various side effects but
01:14:38
in terms of like are we debilitating our
01:14:40
health over the long
01:14:42
run you know it seems to be a reasonably
01:14:45
safe drug and it seems to be a drug that
01:14:47
that folks are are kind of recognizing
01:14:49
as being well worth the cost and
01:14:51
whatever the risks may be well what are
01:14:53
the the implications you lose 40% well
01:14:57
it's about 16% of your weight loss you
01:14:59
typically lose right I mean yeah they'll
01:15:02
say up to 20% if you lose weight you'll
01:15:04
usually see up to 20% of lean muscle
01:15:06
mass of of the of the weight you lost
01:15:08
coming from lean muscle mass
01:15:10
loss and you know 80% or 85% as you say
01:15:14
coming from from body fat loss but with
01:15:16
the OIC drugs they're seeing as high as
01:15:18
40% coming from lean muscle mass which
01:15:20
is obviously concerning I just made an
01:15:21
adjustment I everybody knows I lost like
01:15:23
40 lbs or so or if you've talked to me
01:15:25
for more than 5 minutes you know I have
01:15:27
uh cuz I'll tell you and the first 20
01:15:30
was just fasting and doing keto and then
01:15:32
when this drug came out I tried it I
01:15:33
tried OIC and then I did wovi and I lost
01:15:35
next i'mna give you I didn't gain it
01:15:38
back I I I gain back about four or five
01:15:40
pounds and I also increased protein in
01:15:42
the morning and I do a lot of walking
01:15:44
okay so so let me give you this math and
01:15:46
tell me if it maps to what you have felt
01:15:48
or not so if 250 lb let's just say you
01:15:51
lose 16% of your body body weight that's
01:15:53
40 lb okay so you get to 190 oh sorry to
01:15:57
210 and of that you lose 16 pounds of
01:16:01
muscle is that what you saw or did you
01:16:03
see something less than that no much
01:16:05
less muscle cuz I use weights and I do a
01:16:08
lot of walking and I eat a ton of
01:16:10
protein you're doing the exercise you're
01:16:12
doing the exercise I'm not doing
01:16:13
hardcore exercise so but you have to do
01:16:15
exercise you have you have exercise and
01:16:17
the challenge jcal is that the vast
01:16:19
majority of people that go on the drugs
01:16:21
by the way I'm not saying the drugs
01:16:23
shouldn't be adopted I think that
01:16:24
there's extraordinary benefit health
01:16:25
benefit to the majority of people that
01:16:27
are on these drugs but the downside is
01:16:30
that if you're not exercising you are
01:16:31
going to lose muscle mass and then
01:16:33
obviously there is the fact that you're
01:16:34
now hooked on this thing if you're not
01:16:36
going to figure out ways to change
01:16:38
Behavior I cycled off of it two or three
01:16:39
times and had very minor weight gain
01:16:43
back three four five pounds but I
01:16:45
deliberately changed my relationship
01:16:46
with food portion size and I work out
01:16:49
now and what I found was as I lost
01:16:51
weight my my interest and the joy I got
01:16:54
out of working out dramatically
01:16:56
increased so running walking skiing
01:17:00
everything got easier and I just got
01:17:01
more into it so I like working out again
01:17:04
now that I'm 40 hot pounds 42 pounds off
01:17:07
my Peak weight so I I I think it's an
01:17:11
amazing wonder drve you sum points on
01:17:13
this like a take on this like you think
01:17:15
that these things are overhyped right
01:17:16
now and we're just in the middle of a
01:17:17
hype cycle or what's your key takeaway
01:17:19
my key takeaway is that for many people
01:17:20
from a health perspective I think that
01:17:22
it it could be a really
01:17:25
great
01:17:27
solution I think that these triple
01:17:29
agonists that are coming out are going
01:17:31
to be probably even more effective than
01:17:33
these double agonists that that we have
01:17:34
right now
01:17:36
yeah I don't understand the triple
01:17:39
monjaro is the triple Agonist yeah
01:17:41
people who T monjaro told me it is
01:17:45
unbelievable how not hungry you are yeah
01:17:48
it's super fast too super fast I I just
01:17:51
want to see you know like for example
01:17:53
when you know when you get older in your
01:17:56
60s and 70s one of the biggest risks you
01:17:58
take on and in your 80s is actually like
01:18:01
you know muscular skeletal and falls and
01:18:03
things like that and one of the best
01:18:04
preventative measures for that is muscle
01:18:06
mass and so you get into this weird
01:18:08
Catch 22 of you replace one issue with
01:18:10
another so longitudinally if you use it
01:18:12
for a long time I'm concerned about that
01:18:14
I do think that these gp1s if when we
01:18:16
look back on it will probably be like
01:18:19
Statin and in as much as when stattin
01:18:22
first came on the
01:18:23
Market it was a wonder drug right and
01:18:27
you know we were all teetering towards
01:18:29
you know heart disease and heart attacks
01:18:31
and all of this stuff and then once
01:18:33
people got on these statins I think
01:18:34
there was a very meaningful impact to
01:18:35
the percentage of people that that
01:18:37
suffered heart disease and cardiac
01:18:38
issues but heart disease still continues
01:18:41
to grow and you would say to yourself
01:18:43
well how is this possible because Statin
01:18:44
are effectively free they're generic
01:18:46
they're widely available um and today
01:18:49
right now because of the lack of Supply
01:18:52
the emergency have da order around these
01:18:54
semaglutide allows you to make generics
01:18:57
right now right so the cost of those are
01:18:59
not really a th000 bucks a month but can
01:19:01
be as cheap as a few hundred so you're
01:19:04
getting this widespread adoption and
01:19:05
usage I think the open question for me
01:19:09
is if human history is a guide we're
01:19:12
going to replace this issue with a
01:19:13
different kind of
01:19:15
issue because unfortunately you know
01:19:17
maybe people take it and then they
01:19:19
physiologically adapt and then they just
01:19:21
continue to eat the same or more because
01:19:23
they think wow this is a get out of jail
01:19:24
free card for me and maybe they
01:19:27
overpower that sa that that that gp1 is
01:19:30
supposed to give you I don't know I find
01:19:33
it from a sort of public societal Health
01:19:36
perspective really interesting from an
01:19:39
economic Market perspective I think that
01:19:42
these things are priced to Perfection
01:19:44
it's kind of like Nvidia which is like
01:19:46
right
01:19:48
people everything people are assuming
01:19:51
everything is going to work it's a tough
01:19:52
point in the cycle to be a buyer I think
01:19:54
as as an economic actor but as if you're
01:19:57
making a trade that seems like a hard
01:19:58
trade to make and just to give even some
01:20:01
more color to it noo Nordisk announced
01:20:05
that it was halting its OA kidney
01:20:07
disease trial early well Nick show this
01:20:09
because it was so conclusive yeah I mean
01:20:11
if that sparked a $3.6 billion selloff
01:20:15
in shares of dialysis providers I mean
01:20:18
remember over 40% of Americans are
01:20:20
clinically obese it's a sorry almost %
01:20:23
now it's an extraordinary Health
01:20:24
epidemic in the United States and you
01:20:26
know if this drug can have this sort of
01:20:28
an effect it can reduce cost across the
01:20:29
healthare system so you know there is
01:20:31
still a I mean chim's point I don't
01:20:34
right number this affects cardiovascular
01:20:36
disease diabetes kidney disease liver
01:20:41
disease do does an average 16% weight
01:20:45
loss reduction actually get people from
01:20:47
obesity to un obesity or are they still
01:20:50
are they still obese the obes trial
01:20:53
seemed to I mean remember you have to
01:20:55
get FDA approval for a particular so
01:20:57
this is this is what Jason was
01:20:58
mentioning so this is this is a basket
01:21:00
that Morgan Stanley created which was
01:21:03
essentially starting at the beginning of
01:21:05
the year when the hype was really
01:21:07
starting to get out of control Morgan
01:21:10
Stanley created a basket of the glp1
01:21:11
winners and a basket of the G gp1
01:21:14
potentially disrupted Healthcare stocks
01:21:16
so you could trade them off against each
01:21:18
other and this just shows how it's
01:21:19
performed which is just a blockbuster
01:21:21
trade in the last 10 months so if you if
01:21:24
you went long the glp1 winners and short
01:21:26
these potenti potentially disrupted it's
01:21:30
I mean I've never seen a spread trade
01:21:31
payoff like this in such a short period
01:21:33
of time 80 80% a year in less
01:21:35
unbelievable the nature of creating
01:21:38
would you take the other side of this
01:21:39
trade right now or like how do you I
01:21:40
would I would re and the reason is
01:21:43
because of two two two practical factors
01:21:47
one is that when when a when a market
01:21:50
gets this exaggerated what your price
01:21:52
ing in is essentially like a Panacea
01:21:54
solution that and those tend to not
01:21:56
really be realistic and again I would
01:21:58
point to statens as a good example of
01:22:00
that and so there's a part of it which
01:22:02
is just like these trades are so
01:22:04
overextended that you can probably
01:22:06
pretty be pretty safe on the other side
01:22:08
and then the second part is that I don't
01:22:10
think we really understand
01:22:12
yet the other half of the coin which is
01:22:15
you know for every one of us that's
01:22:18
generally positively inclined around
01:22:20
gp1s who isn't getting enough attention
01:22:23
right now are the doctors who spending a
01:22:25
lot of time researching researching this
01:22:27
stuff who may actually have a
01:22:29
perspective on the other side you know
01:22:31
probably the most prominent one like Bob
01:22:33
lusting so you have to give that a
01:22:37
little bit of time for it to play out
01:22:38
because nobody wants to hear the bease
01:22:40
on
01:22:41
gp1s as a drug that people
01:22:44
take so I I would just say that it's
01:22:46
it's probably again when you see an
01:22:49
economic trade like this it's it's it's
01:22:51
probably okay to be on the other side of
01:22:53
it and then just from a public health
01:22:55
perspective you know take a weight and
01:22:57
see but for a lot of people who are
01:22:59
clinically obese it doesn't seem like
01:23:01
the math is such that if you're at a BMI
01:23:04
of 30 reducing your weight 16% I think
01:23:07
gets you to like a 26 it doesn't get you
01:23:09
under the I think it's meaningful I
01:23:11
think it's meaningful no no no I'm not
01:23:12
saying it's not meaningful I'm saying it
01:23:13
does it it you're still obese yeah I
01:23:16
think the the key thing and I don't want
01:23:18
to give medical advice but I think you
01:23:21
need to do this holistically so you got
01:23:22
to keep your diet and you got to keep
01:23:23
working out in mind when you do it that
01:23:25
should be fairly obvious and those are
01:23:27
always good things to do is you plan to
01:23:28
take it your whole life in spts jcal or
01:23:31
how do you how do you view it no I'm
01:23:32
five pounds from my lowest weight as an
01:23:34
adult and my the weight I used to be
01:23:35
when I ran marathons and so my plan is
01:23:37
to come off of it like by the end of
01:23:40
this year and then and I had taken like
01:23:43
six months off twice doing this so I did
01:23:46
it like in Little intentional
01:23:48
Sprints Sprints yeah just to to get
01:23:51
where I wanted to be and this last five
01:23:54
uh this last five pound what is your do
01:23:57
you have a sense of if your behavior
01:24:02
changes when you're on and you're off
01:24:04
like do you do you I I do feel more
01:24:07
hungry but then I remember
01:24:10
how bad I felt when I was overweight and
01:24:13
then I just weigh myself every day and
01:24:15
if I see myself get above a certain
01:24:17
number I consider that like a red alert
01:24:19
and I just you know either start fasting
01:24:21
working out or just eating super healthy
01:24:23
so it's just the discipline of weighing
01:24:25
myself every day that I've gotten
01:24:28
into and just understanding hey you know
01:24:30
if I make two or three bad decisions
01:24:33
you're not going to make two or three
01:24:34
bad decisions when you're on these drugs
01:24:35
in my experience because you feel so
01:24:36
bloated and so painful when you overeat
01:24:39
that you don't want to do it so it's
01:24:40
really it's really like it hurts you
01:24:42
feel distended and you know there are
01:24:44
reports and it did happen to me twice
01:24:46
over two or three years of doing this
01:24:48
that if you take it and you eat too much
01:24:50
you you could get sick and actually
01:24:51
vomit so
01:24:53
it some people just don't have the
01:24:54
stomach for it I think a lot of people
01:24:56
just tap out it it makes their stomachs
01:24:57
feel too distended or uh gnarly and that
01:25:01
and that's why the dosage actually
01:25:03
really matters they have dosages that
01:25:04
are like a very wide range maybe 10x uh
01:25:08
and so the dosage getting that right
01:25:10
working with your doctor is
01:25:11
key but yeah I'm just I'm excited to get
01:25:13
off of because I want to really start
01:25:15
sincerely weightlifting so I'm getting a
01:25:17
a personal trainer to do like
01:25:18
weightlifting twice a week and get
01:25:20
really into that next because you can't
01:25:23
do hardcore intense working out with us
01:25:25
because you're you know just lower calor
01:25:28
but I think it's a miracle drug um and
01:25:30
I'm I'm excited about it the one
01:25:31
question I had for you on the spread
01:25:32
trade uh before we end Jam does the
01:25:35
nature of making those indexes and
01:25:37
giving people the ability to put the
01:25:39
trade on exacerbate the trade because
01:25:41
then I saw everybody was tweeting about
01:25:43
this you know over the last week does
01:25:45
the nature of an index being made impact
01:25:48
the the the the action stocks you know
01:25:51
Morgan is particularly good at these
01:25:53
basket creations and they tend to make
01:25:55
it for their biggest hedge fund clients
01:25:57
and their richest families so it tends
01:25:59
to be pretty isolated they they they
01:26:02
give an edge to a few folks that so
01:26:04
these things are not broadly
01:26:07
published and so I I doubt it in the end
01:26:09
but so they come up with this idea how
01:26:11
many in how many names are in each index
01:26:13
it all just depends like and and they're
01:26:15
very smart about you know being able to
01:26:17
create these on the Fly based on what
01:26:19
themes they're seeing and then like I
01:26:21
said they share them with their best
01:26:23
hedge fund clients and their and their
01:26:24
and their biggest families they don't
01:26:26
they don't trade you know they don't
01:26:27
share them with us I I I got it Jason
01:26:29
one that I told you like at the end of
01:26:31
all of that at the end of that graph
01:26:32
after everybody put the trade on and got
01:26:34
the win they're like let's get
01:26:36
Shan but uh so they they didn't actually
01:26:39
share it with me in January I wish they
01:26:41
did all right listen we got to wrap up
01:26:42
great show boys uh and we're praying for
01:26:45
peace and the return of the hostages for
01:26:48
the sulan of science the dictator and
01:26:50
the Rainman yeah David a I am the
01:26:53
world's greatest mon we'll see you at
01:26:55
episode 151 enjoy the 150 fan meetups
01:26:58
this weekend anybody who's going to Love
01:27:00
You by
01:27:02
love let your winners
01:27:09
ride and instead we open source it to
01:27:12
the fans and they've just gone crazy
01:27:13
with it love queen
01:27:16
[Music]
01:27:21
of
01:27:23
besties
01:27:25
are that's my dog taking
01:27:30
driveways oh man myit meet me we should
01:27:34
all just get a room and just have one
01:27:35
big huge orgy cuz they're all this
01:27:37
useless it's like this like sexual
01:27:38
tension but they just need to release
01:27:40
[Music]
01:27:46
Som we need to get merch
01:27:51
our
01:27:56
I'm going all
01:27:58
[Music]
01:28:00
in

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 80
    Most heartbreaking
  • 80
    Most polarizing
  • 75
    Most emotional
  • 75
    Most controversial

Episode Highlights

  • Emotional Reflections
    The hosts share their emotional responses to the recent conflict, particularly regarding children affected.
    “I was too emotional to do the show.”
    @ 02m 17s
    October 20, 2023
  • Tinder Box of Conflict
    Discussion on the volatile situation and the potential for escalation in the Middle East.
    “There's going to be a match and the Tinder Box will be lit.”
    @ 09m 48s
    October 20, 2023
  • The Hostage Situation
    The Israeli population seems to have almost written off the hostages, raising concerns about their fate.
    “It seems like the Israeli population just... has almost written off the hostages.”
    @ 22m 31s
    October 20, 2023
  • Understanding Internal Politics
    Delving into the internal politics of Israel is crucial as it could drag the U.S. into war.
    “When a situation like this happens that could drag us into a war...”
    @ 23m 23s
    October 20, 2023
  • The Cycle of Violence
    A vicious cycle of occupation and resistance breeds extremism and fear on both sides.
    “There's conditions of occupation that breeds resistance that breeds extremism.”
    @ 41m 49s
    October 20, 2023
  • The Cycle of Violence
    Discussion on the cycle of violence and radicalization in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    “How does the cycle break?”
    @ 42m 49s
    October 20, 2023
  • Donor Outrage at Ivy League Schools
    Donors are pulling support from Ivy League schools over their handling of the Israel-Palestine issue.
    “These elite universities are essentially asset management businesses.”
    @ 45m 09s
    October 20, 2023
  • Concerns Over Digital Services Act
    The Digital Services Act is seen as a significant threat to internet freedom and privacy.
    “This is about as 1984 as you can get.”
    @ 56m 04s
    October 20, 2023
  • Censorship Concerns
    Discussion on the vague definitions of illegal content and the implications of censorship.
    “This is a censorship regime.”
    @ 01h 04m 12s
    October 20, 2023
  • The Hype Cycle of GP1 Drugs
    Exploring the overhyped expectations surrounding GP1 drugs and their long-term effects.
    “The GP1 hype is as overextended as the AI hype cycle.”
    @ 01h 08m 24s
    October 20, 2023
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger on Hard Work
    Schwarzenegger emphasizes the value of hard work over quick fixes like drugs.
    “There's no shortcut to hard work.”
    @ 01h 13m 42s
    October 20, 2023
  • The Nature of GLP-1 Drugs
    Exploring the impact and understanding of GLP-1 drugs in weight management.
    “I think it's a miracle drug.”
    @ 01h 25m 25s
    October 20, 2023

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Complex Situation03:59
  • Internal Politics23:23
  • Donor Outrage45:09
  • Digital Services Act56:04
  • Censorship Regime1:04:12
  • Vague Definitions1:05:41
  • Hard Work1:13:42
  • Spread Trade Success1:21:30

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Podcast thumbnail
E92: Adam Neumann's second act, a16z's $350M bet, housing policy, Inflation Reduction Act & more
Podcast thumbnail
E167: Google's Woke AI disaster, Nvidia smashes earnings (again), Groq's LPU breakthrough & more
Podcast thumbnail
Epstein Files, Is SaaS Dead?, Moltbook Panic, SpaceX xAI Merger, Trump's Fed Pick
Podcast thumbnail
E56: Constitution DAO, Rittenhouse trial coverage, private sector efficiency vs the government
Podcast thumbnail
Trump Brokers Gaza Peace Deal, National Guard in Chicago, OpenAI/AMD, AI Roundtripping, Gold Rally
Podcast thumbnail
E130: DeSantis's Twitter Spaces, debt ceiling, Nvidia rips, state of VC, startup failure & more
Podcast thumbnail
E84: Markets update, crypto collapse, Russia/Ukraine endgame, state of the podcast
Podcast thumbnail
E75: Fast shuts down, board culpability, Elon buys 9% of Twitter, deplatforming's evolution & more
Podcast thumbnail
E36: New FTC Chair, breaking up big tech, government silent spying, Jon Stewart, wildfires & more