Search Captions & Ask AI

Trump's 'Mob' Tactics and Corporate Capitulation | Pivot

January 31, 2025 / 10:53

This episode discusses Meta's $25 million settlement with Trump, implications of social media bans, and concerns about political intimidation.

The conversation highlights the settlement's allocation towards Trump's Presidential Library and compares it to Disney's similar payout. The hosts express skepticism about the motivations behind such payments, questioning their impact on free speech and media integrity.

Scott and Reed discuss the societal implications of companies yielding to political pressure, emphasizing the chilling effect on dissenting voices. They reflect on the responsibilities of media companies in upholding American values against intimidation.

The episode also touches on the personal safety of public figures and the potential for state power abuses, with Reed sharing his concerns about the current political climate.

Overall, the hosts urge listeners to remain vigilant about the erosion of democratic principles and the role of media in checking power.

TL;DR

Meta's $25 million settlement with Trump raises concerns about political intimidation and media integrity.

Video

00:00:00
meta will pay Trump $25 million
00:00:02
settlement for shutting down his
00:00:03
accounts after January 6 most of the
00:00:05
payment will go towards Trump's
00:00:06
Presidential Library again much as
00:00:08
Disney's payment of $15 million is going
00:00:10
to do that X also who also kicked Trump
00:00:13
off the platform after January 6 says
00:00:15
this negotiating its own settlement with
00:00:17
Trump uh apparently the Trump people
00:00:19
said Mark wasn't going to get into the
00:00:21
tent uh unless um unless he did this I
00:00:25
just you don't seem to be paying anybody
00:00:27
millions of dollars to get in the tent
00:00:29
so what what do you think so obviously I
00:00:34
think that was a long sigh that you just
00:00:35
had there you're like well look I
00:00:38
obviously think that the the the the
00:00:40
notion of um of you know kind of this
00:00:44
sort of payoff is I think um you
00:00:48
know is is to put it charitably
00:00:52
suboptimal um you know I uh and I think
00:00:55
that the the you know the question of
00:00:58
like the fact is when the when people
00:01:00
are removed from services for violations
00:01:02
of terms of service they're removed for
00:01:04
violations of terms of service um and I
00:01:06
think that's a uh perfectly good thing
00:01:08
and and I you know myself am a massive
00:01:12
advocate for you know kind of the rule
00:01:14
of law and and kind of how these kind of
00:01:16
contracts work but um I understand
00:01:20
expediency in
00:01:23
navigation okay what does that mean what
00:01:25
does that mean sounds like a mob move to
00:01:27
me you know uh I don't wouldn't want
00:01:29
nice company you got there wouldn't want
00:01:31
anything to happen to it kind of thing
00:01:33
well let's hope that we see very little
00:01:36
of that in the coming years although
00:01:38
obviously uh we have deep worries in the
00:01:40
other direction could couldn't he keep
00:01:42
doing this suing people and getting
00:01:44
these things well I guess the question
00:01:46
will be
00:01:48
is um is you know it's kind of like how
00:01:53
much do people kind of respond to this
00:01:57
sort of you know
00:02:00
um call it uh excess pressure uh on on
00:02:07
these kind of things and I think that
00:02:08
that uh frankly you
00:02:12
know we shouldn't want it as a society
00:02:15
uh and and uh you know I think probably
00:02:19
there will at some point be a bridge too
00:02:21
far on it and seeing what that that that
00:02:24
bridge looks like um I think will is is
00:02:27
still something where you know we're
00:02:30
looking for that bridge too far is yes
00:02:31
that's right uh Scott well there's two
00:02:33
there's two Dimensions to this the first
00:02:36
is from a pure shareholder standpoint it
00:02:38
probably makes sense when the
00:02:39
president's coming after you to say and
00:02:41
you make you know $20 billion a year an
00:02:43
operating profit to say yeah just make
00:02:44
it go away just give them $25 million to
00:02:47
the Presidential Library and make it go
00:02:48
away the problem is and I wouldn't
00:02:51
expect based on pattern behavior Mark
00:02:54
Zuckerberg to think anything about this
00:02:57
is that this has real societal
00:02:58
implications and that is despite the
00:03:01
fact Bob Iger made $45 Million last year
00:03:03
I would argue he's becoming more and
00:03:05
more impoverished in terms of his
00:03:08
citizenship and that is when a media
00:03:11
company says things that are a fraction
00:03:16
of the misinformation slander
00:03:17
disparaging statements that the
00:03:19
president has made himself that happens
00:03:21
every day online and they agree to set
00:03:24
precedent by bending a knee and bowing
00:03:27
to this intimidation it's sends a chill
00:03:31
across the entire [ __ ] Nation I I'm
00:03:34
on Morning Joe and I call the president
00:03:38
an insurrectionist and a rapist and M
00:03:41
stops the show to clarify he was found
00:03:44
guilty of sexual abuse liable oh excuse
00:03:47
me sexual liable he was found liable of
00:03:49
sexual abuse is that the right
00:03:50
terminology yes I I just made I'm call
00:03:53
me m brazinski but go look at what we're
00:03:55
doing all right yeah and by the way the
00:03:57
judge then went on in his sensing to say
00:04:00
the street term for that is rape right
00:04:03
so what do you have you have a group of
00:04:05
people this is straight out of the
00:04:06
fascist handbook intimidate anyone who
00:04:10
says anything negative about you and if
00:04:13
these companies in my opinion had more
00:04:15
Fidelity to American values and the very
00:04:17
important role media plays in checking
00:04:20
power they wouldn't be bending the
00:04:22
[ __ ] knee like this so is it a
00:04:25
practical thing to do yes you can argue
00:04:27
with that has it sent a chill across the
00:04:32
entire country and what is an incredible
00:04:35
double standard that the critics of
00:04:37
President Trump are now feel that
00:04:39
they're being held to look at the [ __ ]
00:04:42
he has said about people that's been
00:04:45
incorrect so I you know yeah Bob and
00:04:48
Mark I expected this from Mark I was
00:04:50
disappointed to see it from Bob where
00:04:52
are the men where are the Americans who
00:04:55
are going to stand up and say no if if
00:04:57
you're not guilty if we're not if the
00:05:00
entire ecosystem has never been held
00:05:02
liable for things much more slanderous
00:05:04
or disparaging than these statements
00:05:06
I'll see you in court in this case it
00:05:08
wasn't statements he he he he broke the
00:05:11
rules of Facebook and they kicked him
00:05:12
off that's all it was not which they're
00:05:14
allowed to do yeah exactly so re when we
00:05:17
when we talked in October I asked if you
00:05:18
were concerned about Trump and
00:05:19
retribution and your own well-being and
00:05:21
and you said yes uh that was before that
00:05:24
was I think before the election talk
00:05:26
about now how are you feeling because
00:05:28
obviously you were one of the more
00:05:29
prominent supporters of kamla Harris
00:05:32
obviously a big Democratic donor you do
00:05:34
give to Republicans also um uh for which
00:05:37
for some reason you get endless [ __ ] I'm
00:05:39
not sure why I think that's probably
00:05:40
fine to do that um how do you feel now
00:05:44
do you feel in that crosshairs that we
00:05:46
had
00:05:48
discussed well it's unclear um I'm
00:05:51
hopeful that a bunch of my friends who
00:05:54
are around uh the administration say
00:05:57
look that's just kind of all rhetoric
00:06:00
and you know uh isn't actually going to
00:06:02
be that's what they part yes that's what
00:06:05
they say to me um and so that obviously
00:06:07
is hopeful um but I obviously it's one
00:06:10
of the things that I think you know both
00:06:12
me personally and we as Americans need
00:06:14
to watch carefully because we do want to
00:06:19
be to continue to be uh you know the
00:06:22
home of the brave and land of the free
00:06:24
um and I think that that's very
00:06:26
important to be you know resolutely
00:06:29
against you know kind of abuses of of
00:06:32
state power um for individual interests
00:06:36
and so you know like I said I went and
00:06:38
talked to a whole bunch of people who
00:06:39
are you know kind of in you know and
00:06:41
around the current Administration said
00:06:43
look you know I have this worry they
00:06:45
said look we've talked to a bunch of
00:06:47
people they say this is not something
00:06:49
we're going to do it's like okay then
00:06:52
you know let's let's um you know let are
00:06:57
these the same people that said he
00:06:58
wasn't going to let out everybody at
00:07:00
January 6th he's only going to let out
00:07:01
he wasn't going to let out the criminals
00:07:03
but then he did it wasn't the same it
00:07:05
wasn't the same people as those um he's
00:07:08
done that several times he's done that
00:07:10
several times there's there's worries
00:07:11
and like for example letting out the
00:07:12
people who assaulted police
00:07:15
officers is is is a you know as per what
00:07:18
Scott was saying earlier is a terrible
00:07:20
signal um it's basically saying hey um
00:07:24
you know like if you're doing violence
00:07:26
in a in a in a cause that I am
00:07:28
supportive of of you know I have this
00:07:30
thing of a presidential pardon um and
00:07:33
you know that's obviously uh you know
00:07:36
frankly you know uh terrifying
00:07:39
concerning right but you didn't want a
00:07:41
presidential pardon correct no no no of
00:07:43
course not but here's the problem if I'm
00:07:46
a thoughtful guy who's high-profile with
00:07:49
a lot of business interests with a
00:07:52
family I would be inclined I'm not just
00:07:54
going to speak for you Reed I'd be
00:07:55
inclined to keep a very low profile over
00:07:58
the next 12 months
00:08:00
whereas the people on the right are
00:08:02
emboldened to be aggressive and pollute
00:08:05
and flood the Zone with misinformation
00:08:07
and [ __ ] and attacks and the people
00:08:10
on the other side of the aisle feel like
00:08:13
well maybe I should just keep quiet for
00:08:15
a while because they are removing
00:08:16
security details of people which is
00:08:19
nothing but repackage violence when you
00:08:22
took out the head of the Iranian
00:08:25
security forces and you ordered that
00:08:27
strike as a general and the president
00:08:29
for whatever reason doesn't like you is
00:08:30
removing your SEC your security detail
00:08:33
that is repackaged violence against that
00:08:35
person so what we have is a gr this is
00:08:38
the road to Fascism keep them quiet put
00:08:42
a chill across people I'm going to keep
00:08:44
a low profile and maybe I'm just not
00:08:47
going to be quite as aggressive that is
00:08:51
that is let me be clear one of the one
00:08:53
of the roads to Fascism and I want you
00:08:56
both to respond to this is littered with
00:08:58
calls or accus accusations that people
00:09:00
are overreacting call me
00:09:03
overreacting let me just say Amanda
00:09:05
loves your whole this whole Jam Scott
00:09:07
she was like Scot's on fire I love it
00:09:09
she was vaguely attracted to you I think
00:09:11
um vaguely is doing a lot of work there
00:09:14
vaguely vaguely is doing a lot of work
00:09:16
she was she wanted me to tell you um I
00:09:18
think you're right but that's I I think
00:09:21
it's you know people that are very
00:09:22
high-profile agreed aren't certainly
00:09:24
aren't backing down don't seem to be
00:09:26
disappearing he's right here right he's
00:09:27
talking about it so I think the question
00:09:29
is when Mark does these deals when he
00:09:31
just doesn't have to and it doesn't help
00:09:32
him from a shareholder point of view I
00:09:34
really that's nonsense um it's really
00:09:36
but I again we expected Mark to do this
00:09:38
sorry I know Reed you were Reed was
00:09:40
early at at Facebook for and has been
00:09:43
had been a mentor to to Mark I don't
00:09:46
think he's listening to someone like you
00:09:47
anymore but that said you you and Bill
00:09:50
Gates had been um and probably are no
00:09:53
longer I would guess but I don't know
00:09:56
look the thing um I think that the
00:09:58
American people should pay a lot of
00:09:59
attention to the removing the security
00:10:02
detail from you know a person who spent
00:10:05
their entire life serving the American
00:10:08
people putting himself In Harm's Way um
00:10:11
you know kind of helping secure the the
00:10:14
safety of America you know both locally
00:10:17
and Americans abroad and saying hey for
00:10:21
petty reasons I am putting that person
00:10:24
directly in the Harm's Way of violence
00:10:26
and I think that is a you know an
00:10:28
unpatriotic iotic you know personal
00:10:30
thing that I think is extremely
00:10:32
important that everyone should pay
00:10:33
attention to and I think it's exactly
00:10:35
that is I think that you know as Scott
00:10:37
saying on the things that are like that
00:10:40
is the kind of thing that is deeply
00:10:43
unamerican like I think people need to
00:10:46
speak up about 100%

Episode Highlights

  • Concerns Over Societal Implications
    The settlement raises concerns about the societal implications of bending to intimidation from powerful figures.
    “It sends a chill across the entire nation.”
    @ 03m 31s
    January 31, 2025

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Societal Implications03:31
  • Fascism Warning04:05

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes