Search Captions & Ask AI

#AIS: Antonio Garcia Martinez & Glenn Greenwald debate Ukraine, moderated by David Sacks

May 25, 2022 / 34:11

This episode features a debate on U.S. involvement in Ukraine between writers Antonio Garcia Martinez and Glenn Greenwald. Key topics include the refugee crisis, media narratives, and differing perspectives on the war.

Antonio Garcia Martinez shares his firsthand experiences in Ukraine, highlighting the massive displacement of people and the resilience of Ukrainians. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the situation on the ground rather than relying solely on media portrayals.

Glenn Greenwald counters by questioning the validity of drawing conclusions from a brief visit to a specific region. He argues that the media narrative has been overwhelmingly supportive of Ukraine, and he points out that many countries around the world do not share the same perspective as the U.S.

The discussion also touches on the complexities of the war, the motivations behind U.S. involvement, and the potential consequences of escalating the conflict. Both guests express their views on the implications of U.S. foreign policy and the historical context of American military interventions.

The episode concludes with reflections on the liberal order and the contrasting experiences of people living in war zones versus those in stable democracies.

TL;DR

Antonio Garcia Martinez and Glenn Greenwald debate U.S. involvement in Ukraine, discussing media narratives, refugee crises, and the complexities of the war.

Video

00:00:00
all right
00:00:01
this segment is on ukraine and we've uh
00:00:04
we're calling the ukraine debate because
00:00:06
we have two great writers and thinkers
00:00:09
up here who are on slightly different
00:00:11
sides of this issue of the us
00:00:13
involvement in ukraine
00:00:15
antonio garcia martinez writes is the
00:00:17
author of the best-selling book chaos
00:00:19
monkey is about silicon valley he writes
00:00:22
a sub-stack called pull request
00:00:24
and also has a great call-in show
00:00:27
and glenn greenwald is uh glenn
00:00:30
greenwald is back with us uh from
00:00:32
yesterday
00:00:33
uh also a phenomenal writer has a uh
00:00:35
amazing sub stack all of you guys should
00:00:37
check out as well and a great call-in
00:00:38
show um
00:00:40
so in in setting up this topic let me
00:00:42
just say i think you know that
00:00:45
um
00:00:46
you know in thinking about the us
00:00:47
involvement in ukraine um you know
00:00:50
there's not a lot of debate about this
00:00:51
topic and in that sense it's pretty
00:00:54
similar to other wars that the us has
00:00:56
gotten into
00:00:58
many of you probably are not old enough
00:01:00
to remember when the u.s got into iraq
00:01:03
or afghanistan
00:01:05
and i'm not old enough to remember the
00:01:07
us getting into vietnam but the thing to
00:01:09
understand about all those wars is that
00:01:10
they were incredibly popular
00:01:12
at the time that we entered them and by
00:01:14
the time that they ended they were not
00:01:16
and now i'm not saying i'm not
00:01:19
prejudging ukraine and saying it's one
00:01:21
of those i think there's important
00:01:22
differences that we should get into but
00:01:24
i think we should at least have this
00:01:25
debate and we need more discussion
00:01:27
around this and so for that i'm grateful
00:01:30
that antonio and glenn decide to
00:01:31
participate
00:01:37
[Music]
00:01:49
so what i'm going to do is kick it to
00:01:50
each of them for kind of five minute
00:01:52
opening statements and then we'll just
00:01:53
get into sort of more of a back and
00:01:55
forth and we'll start with antonio
00:01:57
cool thanks thanks david uh thanks for
00:01:59
skewing the moderation from like
00:02:01
literally the first second comparing it
00:02:02
to a rock because i come up here to say
00:02:03
it's not about a rock at all um
00:02:06
but um
00:02:07
yeah so let's just start off with i
00:02:09
think probably most people here know
00:02:10
that i actually spent some time in
00:02:11
ukraine um unlike a lot of the
00:02:13
independent voices um
00:02:15
who decided to opine from afar about
00:02:17
ukraine i i felt that the american media
00:02:19
discourse about ukraine was completely
00:02:20
skewed and it just smelled kind of
00:02:22
bullshitted to me and so i thought i had
00:02:23
to go and actually see it and so i spent
00:02:25
some time on the polish border with
00:02:26
ukraine uh this was kind of in the
00:02:28
earliest part of the war kind of early
00:02:29
march and the western part of ukraine
00:02:31
which by the way is not particularly
00:02:32
dangerous or anything is probably no
00:02:34
more dangerous than walking across san
00:02:35
francisco these days to be honest um but
00:02:37
it was interesting to actually go and
00:02:39
see and i took away two things i wrote
00:02:41
two subset post about it that i want to
00:02:42
share with you
00:02:44
two parts of the ukraine story one the
00:02:46
refugee situation is incredible it is
00:02:49
something that you have to see to
00:02:50
believe and even then you can't quite
00:02:52
understand the scope of it 10 million
00:02:54
ukrainians fully a quarter of the
00:02:56
country is currently displaced something
00:02:58
like six million ukrainians have left in
00:03:00
the span of two months when you stand at
00:03:02
the border at um
00:03:04
medica which is one of the the border
00:03:06
crossings with poland what you see is
00:03:07
you're you're at it and you realize
00:03:09
you're at the fringes of sort of normal
00:03:11
you know western european life and
00:03:13
you've entered on the other side of that
00:03:14
is hell that people are escaping and
00:03:16
what do you see you see
00:03:18
again the men can't leave because
00:03:19
they're prohibited from leaving because
00:03:20
they're because they have to fight and
00:03:22
so you see is old people or women with
00:03:24
children imagine a woman in her 30s with
00:03:26
two kids a little rolly bag and like a
00:03:28
cat in a bag like that's the typical
00:03:30
thing and just a line of them going over
00:03:31
the border again and again and again
00:03:33
right and the polls have been amazing
00:03:35
and how they receive the ukrainians
00:03:36
literally millions of ukrainians but all
00:03:38
the same it's an enormous strain
00:03:39
everywhere you go in eastern poland or
00:03:41
western ukraine that's a big open area
00:03:42
is basically a refugee camp whether it
00:03:44
be a train station repurposed warehouses
00:03:46
all of it the human situation is just
00:03:48
kind of mind-boggling the other thing
00:03:50
i'd like to share i crossed the border
00:03:52
it was weird crossing the border there's
00:03:53
this line of people looking to leave and
00:03:55
there's like you with my little starlink
00:03:57
and my little bag and my little body
00:03:59
armor like walking across the other way
00:04:00
because you can't take cars across
00:04:02
everyone walks across and everyone's
00:04:03
looking at me like i'm crazy
00:04:05
because why are you walking in the other
00:04:06
direction bro and so anyway i walked in
00:04:08
the other direction had a driver pick me
00:04:09
up experienced a little bit of western
00:04:10
ukraine for for a few days and i
00:04:13
experience what i think probably nobody
00:04:14
here has experienced directly which is
00:04:16
total war right a society that's
00:04:18
completely and totally mobilized to
00:04:20
repel a foreign invader right i was in a
00:04:22
city called la viv which is one of the
00:04:24
western cities that sort of free ukraine
00:04:26
and everything there is either men and
00:04:27
weapons and trucks going east or women
00:04:30
and children and refugees going west
00:04:31
that's all you would see that's all that
00:04:33
would happen there and all of society
00:04:35
from the interpreter i had because
00:04:36
unfortunately i speak no ukrainian to
00:04:38
the driver who would drive me around to
00:04:40
the hacker interviewer who was like
00:04:42
ddosing russian websites all of them
00:04:44
would punctuate their statements with we
00:04:46
will win right and that's when i
00:04:47
realized that the big mistake that
00:04:48
everyone had made i think particularly
00:04:50
in the u.s discourse is underrating
00:04:52
ukrainian resolve and their zeal for
00:04:54
their own nationalist project right
00:04:56
after
00:04:59
after spending a day there and again
00:05:01
remember this is the relatively early
00:05:02
days of the war keeve is still encircled
00:05:05
it wasn't clear if they were if the
00:05:06
belarusians would start a western front
00:05:07
it was all still up in the air but i was
00:05:09
starting to think you know i i don't see
00:05:10
how the russians win this like this just
00:05:12
seems impossible ukraine is the size of
00:05:14
texas it has a population of 40 million
00:05:16
people roughly the size i imagine the
00:05:19
russians showing up with 200 000
00:05:20
soldiers and trying to control
00:05:21
california it's going to be very
00:05:22
difficult to do particularly when
00:05:23
literally everybody is staring at you
00:05:25
and saying we will win which is what
00:05:26
what happened and that's when i realized
00:05:28
that this whole story was very different
00:05:29
than it's being projected in the united
00:05:31
states and that's i felt um i felt
00:05:33
vindicated and going because i think
00:05:35
there aren't that many american
00:05:36
journalists there and i think a lot of
00:05:37
the discourse in the u.s tends to skew
00:05:39
towards iraq or towards projection of
00:05:41
american political domestic neuroses and
00:05:43
not the facts on the ground in
00:05:45
ukraine in which you have devastated
00:05:47
cities you have women and children
00:05:48
refugees you have literally a total war
00:05:50
situation that the western world hasn't
00:05:52
seen since world war ii that's the
00:05:54
reality of ukraine and what i hope to
00:05:56
debate here
00:05:58
all right thank you glenn
00:05:59
great so i certainly have respect for
00:06:02
anyone's decision to go actually see a
00:06:04
place that you want to talk about i
00:06:07
think that there is though a question of
00:06:10
how much you can actually learn about a
00:06:11
country of 44 million people with an
00:06:13
incredibly complex history with extreme
00:06:15
diversity of thought
00:06:17
in terms of the population by going for
00:06:19
whatever it is a week or 10 days to a
00:06:21
kind of sliver of that country that has
00:06:23
extremely different views than another
00:06:25
region for example if in 2003 you wanted
00:06:27
to go before the war in iraq and figure
00:06:29
out what iraqis thought if you went to
00:06:31
the kurdish regions of iraq you would
00:06:33
hear nothing but i want the united
00:06:35
states to come and liberate us from
00:06:36
salaam hussein if you went to the sunni
00:06:38
triangle you would hear if you come if
00:06:40
the united states comes here we're going
00:06:41
to make this a graveyard
00:06:43
of of americans and and similarly if you
00:06:46
go to western ukraine of course you're
00:06:47
going to hear
00:06:49
we want american help we want to fight
00:06:50
the russians to the end if you go to the
00:06:52
eastern up regions of ukraine which are
00:06:54
russian speaking who identify with
00:06:55
moscow you're going to hear the exact
00:06:58
opposite so i think you know it it's
00:07:00
commendable to go to a country like
00:07:02
ukraine i think we have to be humble
00:07:04
about our ability to
00:07:06
understand
00:07:08
the thoughts of the population the
00:07:09
reality on the ground when you go to
00:07:12
certain segments that you select um and
00:07:15
that are almost likely to kind of feed
00:07:16
back to you what it is that uh you're
00:07:19
already expecting to hear the other
00:07:20
thing i think is very important to note
00:07:23
is that
00:07:24
you know first of all
00:07:26
i'm a little surprised by the idea that
00:07:29
i guess it was implicit that antonio
00:07:31
felt that the media narrative has been
00:07:34
off or one-sided in the sense that it
00:07:37
hasn't been favorable enough to the idea
00:07:40
that ukraine is the victim that needs
00:07:41
help and russia is the
00:07:43
clear aggressor i can't remember
00:07:46
ever reading an article on the
00:07:47
mainstream press since the invasion that
00:07:49
said anything other than that which is
00:07:52
why you know 80 percent of americans the
00:07:54
entire bipartisan class in washington of
00:07:57
both parties are essentially unified in
00:07:59
support of the narrative that antonio
00:08:02
believes in my opinion with great
00:08:04
sincerity i think there's been if
00:08:05
anything a kind of
00:08:07
lack of dissent available
00:08:10
in the united states on the other side
00:08:12
and this is one thing i want to
00:08:13
emphasize is
00:08:14
there has been this claim this sort of
00:08:16
implicit claim sometimes explicit claim
00:08:18
that the entire war is united behind the
00:08:20
united states behind ukraine against
00:08:22
russia
00:08:23
the reality is overwhelmingly
00:08:26
the
00:08:27
most of the world is in fact not united
00:08:30
behind the united states and then in a
00:08:32
position on ukraine most of the global
00:08:34
south 15 of the most of the 20
00:08:37
most populous countries on the planet
00:08:39
either abstained or voted no when it
00:08:41
came time to decide whether to expel
00:08:43
russia from the human rights council
00:08:46
and some of those countries are
00:08:48
tyrannies many of them such as india the
00:08:50
world's largest democracy brazil the
00:08:53
second largest democracy after the
00:08:54
united states um
00:08:56
very much deviates from the re the the
00:08:59
consensus in the united states and and
00:09:01
sometimes i think if we're americans and
00:09:03
we're living in a country in which we're
00:09:05
bombarded with one message it's
00:09:07
incumbent upon us to ask why it is that
00:09:09
so much of the rest of the world does
00:09:12
not believe that the united states is
00:09:13
participating in the war in ukraine with
00:09:15
benevolent intentions or with the desire
00:09:18
to protect democracy or protect against
00:09:20
aggression when in fact the the rest of
00:09:23
the world looks at the history of the
00:09:24
united states not just distant but very
00:09:26
recent and sees a country not devoted to
00:09:28
protecting democracy but to propping up
00:09:31
tyranny to
00:09:32
fighting wars not to protect innocents
00:09:34
but to sacrifice innocence in its own
00:09:37
interests and so i think that's one
00:09:39
really important thing is to make sure
00:09:41
that we're looking at this war not as a
00:09:44
country that's essentially a belligerent
00:09:46
in it but as a country that is just a
00:09:49
small part of the rest of the world that
00:09:51
has a lot of opinions the other thing i
00:09:53
would point out is
00:09:55
war in general
00:09:56
is
00:09:58
the worst thing that humanity can
00:10:00
unleash upon itself there is no war that
00:10:02
doesn't involve extreme amounts of
00:10:04
atrocities extreme amounts of war crimes
00:10:08
all kinds of hideous things and if you
00:10:10
look at any war any war
00:10:13
not just the ones that united states the
00:10:15
united states adversaries have started
00:10:17
but once the united states has started
00:10:19
ones that the united states is allies
00:10:21
have started that we support
00:10:23
you're going to find enormous amounts of
00:10:25
atrocities and any decent person
00:10:28
with any kind of a minimum moral compass
00:10:30
who looks at any war like that is going
00:10:32
to walk away horrified and disgusted and
00:10:34
wanting to do something about it
00:10:36
the only difference between what's
00:10:38
happening in the war in ukraine and so
00:10:40
many other wars
00:10:42
is that the u.s media is constantly
00:10:44
showing us images
00:10:46
and stories about ukrainian victims as
00:10:50
it should
00:10:51
but think about the wars that the united
00:10:53
states has itself started or is propping
00:10:55
up like for example the war in yemen
00:10:57
that has been going on for many years
00:10:59
that is still going on because the
00:11:00
united states is supplying saudi arabia
00:11:03
not exactly a democracy with enormous
00:11:05
amounts of weapons and and money and
00:11:07
intelligence to fight that war
00:11:09
and think about how much you've heard or
00:11:12
seen
00:11:14
about the victims of yemen how many
00:11:17
yemenis have you heard from talking
00:11:19
about their relatives who have been lost
00:11:21
in in in battle or how many uh people
00:11:24
who we bombed in wedding parties and the
00:11:26
like have been lost and well and so i
00:11:28
think what this can happen is it can
00:11:30
create an imbalance in our perception
00:11:32
the imbalance isn't that the war in
00:11:35
ukraine really isn't horrible it is but
00:11:37
that there's really nothing
00:11:39
extraordinary about what's taking place
00:11:41
in that war all wars including the ones
00:11:43
we start the ones that were waging the
00:11:44
ones that were supporting have the same
00:11:46
kinds of atrocities and the question
00:11:48
ultimately becomes does the united
00:11:50
states really have benevolent motives in
00:11:52
trying to
00:11:54
defend ukraine instead of sacrifice it
00:11:56
and secondly does the united states have
00:11:58
the ability to foster a positive outcome
00:12:00
on the other side of the world involving
00:12:02
extremely complex cultures and histories
00:12:05
and two countries of very intertwined
00:12:08
geostrategic interests that even if we
00:12:10
did have the right motives would we
00:12:12
really have the ability by flooding this
00:12:14
country with weapons and all the other
00:12:16
things we typically do in wars to foster
00:12:18
a positive outcome and i think that's
00:12:19
why the rest of the world has a lot of
00:12:21
doubts
00:12:22
okay thank you lin so glenn went a
00:12:23
little bit longer so antonio i want to
00:12:25
give you a couple of minutes to respond
00:12:26
to that and then i want to ask you both
00:12:27
a question okay i think i've welcomed
00:12:29
the wrong thing i didn't realize we're
00:12:30
debating yemen instead of ukraine glenn
00:12:32
um or indian foreign policy instead of
00:12:34
our own um one thing i'd say is one
00:12:36
thing you said is just completely wrong
00:12:37
it's not the case that eastern ukraine
00:12:39
is pro-russian if so how do you explain
00:12:41
mariopol a city completely destroyed
00:12:43
that fought to the last man with
00:12:45
civilians literally hauling up in a
00:12:46
steel plane how do you explain all the
00:12:47
successes in the eastern part of the war
00:12:49
you never actually mentioned the facts
00:12:50
of the war you're is what abouting other
00:12:52
countries reaction to the war the fact
00:12:54
that the eastern front in russia the war
00:12:55
is going very poorly for russia how do
00:12:57
you explain that fact that if eastern
00:12:58
ukraine is actually pro-russian that the
00:13:00
russians are doing so poorly there the
00:13:01
other thing i would say i don't think
00:13:03
it's the fact if you look at most polls
00:13:04
and it's funny this poll came out and
00:13:06
instantly your friend tucker carlson as
00:13:08
well as jd vans have to change their
00:13:09
line on ukraine because they realize
00:13:11
that it's hard to be a populist if your
00:13:12
views aren't very popular right ap did a
00:13:14
poll and not just democrats support
00:13:17
biden being tougher on russian
00:13:18
republicans do as well right and why is
00:13:21
that because you have a small country
00:13:22
that's getting crushed by a country
00:13:24
that's been the historical sworn enemy
00:13:26
of the united states as long as anyone
00:13:27
can remember i live out in the middle of
00:13:29
nowhere in a red state trump country in
00:13:31
the desert outside of reno and people
00:13:33
are flying ukrainian flags along with
00:13:35
the u.s flags i don't think that's
00:13:36
because they read the new york times
00:13:37
right
00:13:38
um
00:13:40
the other
00:13:43
so antonio let me ask a question so we
00:13:46
recently had
00:13:47
uh well previously binding can i just
00:13:49
address one last thing there because
00:13:50
several points there um you know the
00:13:52
other thing i would say is that you know
00:13:54
this in that country don't support it
00:13:56
one thing i found one aspect of the
00:13:58
story that i found was very interesting
00:13:59
was that all of europe has shown up on
00:14:01
ukraine's door to help out the
00:14:03
ukrainians right usually i'm
00:14:05
i'm both eu us citizen usually i read
00:14:07
both media it's like the u.s that is
00:14:09
like the hard line real politique and
00:14:11
then the eu that's in like geopolitical
00:14:13
la la land i think in the case of this
00:14:15
story it's been reversed
00:14:16
and i think the us is taking ukraine and
00:14:18
projecting it in its own domestic
00:14:19
political narratives like lenas and i
00:14:21
think the europeans actually see their
00:14:23
own collective history in the ukrainian
00:14:24
story because whether it be the spanish
00:14:26
civil war whether it be the germans they
00:14:28
all remember what total war actually
00:14:30
means what it is to stumble through
00:14:31
destroyed streets and be a refugee and a
00:14:33
displaced person americans don't have an
00:14:35
experience of that they can't really
00:14:36
resonate with that fortunately for us to
00:14:38
be clear but i think europeans do so if
00:14:40
you go to that border area you will see
00:14:42
all of europe as far away as spain
00:14:43
denmark whatever showing up to actually
00:14:45
help the ukraines the last thing i would
00:14:47
say is i think one thing that unites i
00:14:49
think the old left that you probably put
00:14:51
yourself into in with glenn like a
00:14:52
bernie leftist and the new right is that
00:14:55
both consider two key things one the us
00:14:58
can never act abroad in a legitimate
00:15:00
good way everything the u.s does abroad
00:15:02
is always a fiasco and then two
00:15:03
everything that happens abroad is our
00:15:05
fault like literally the entire world's
00:15:07
events are downstream of the state
00:15:08
department phone call and i just don't i
00:15:11
just don't think that's true being in
00:15:12
ukraine it doesn't seem to me as if the
00:15:14
us is pulling all the strings on the
00:15:16
contrary it seems like a very chaotic
00:15:17
situation where the ukrainians are
00:15:19
trying to improvise as much as they can
00:15:20
and so again on the one hand i reject
00:15:21
the fact that the u.s can't act abroad
00:15:23
well i think it can if you look at
00:15:24
things east asia japan korea western
00:15:27
europe itself the u.s has created the
00:15:28
conditions for democracy in the past
00:15:29
okay but antonio is there a limit to
00:15:31
wise us involvement in ukraine so
00:15:34
you know we have biden basically said
00:15:37
that putin cannot remain in power and
00:15:38
then immediately his own press secretary
00:15:40
walked that back as a gaff he then had
00:15:42
secretary of defense austin say that our
00:15:45
objective in ukraine is not just to
00:15:48
expel the russians but to weaken russia
00:15:51
as a great power so it can never
00:15:52
threaten anyone again you then had seth
00:15:54
moulton the the uh a democrat of the
00:15:56
house armed services committee saying
00:15:58
that we were in a proxy war with russia
00:16:00
and then cindy hoyer the house majority
00:16:02
leader said we are at war with russia do
00:16:05
you think we are at war with russia and
00:16:06
is that wise no we're in a proxy war
00:16:08
we're in a proxy worth russia what is
00:16:10
the vital national interest of the
00:16:11
united states that compels us to be in a
00:16:13
war admittedly through a proxy with
00:16:16
russia that has six thousand nuclear
00:16:17
weapons even if i were to grant that we
00:16:20
should be trying to out of humanitarian
00:16:23
motives expel the russians
00:16:26
from ukraine do you believe that we
00:16:28
should be trying to destabilize and
00:16:29
topple putin
00:16:31
let me counter that with the questions i
00:16:32
feel like i'm debating two people but
00:16:33
like i jumped in my tweet the odds are
00:16:36
even worse for the ukrainians so i'll
00:16:37
take it but um
00:16:40
i mean i ask you this question in miami
00:16:41
not too long ago david um you're the one
00:16:43
who said oh we're threatening world war
00:16:45
three we're engaging in nuclear
00:16:46
brinksmanship by the way things that we
00:16:48
did all throughout the cold war right i
00:16:50
was raised as an 80s kid here in miami
00:16:52
we used to do this thing all the time at
00:16:53
what point would you stop at what point
00:16:54
do you think it's actually worth rolling
00:16:55
the dice at what point between levive
00:16:58
and warsaw and your front door would you
00:17:00
stop and say actually world war iii
00:17:01
nuclear war is worth risking because
00:17:02
that's an answer i don't get out of the
00:17:04
appeasers at what point do you actually
00:17:05
put your foot down
00:17:06
well i mean look what i've said is that
00:17:08
i'm willing to arm ukraine under cold
00:17:11
war rules i.e the way that we armed the
00:17:14
mujahideen in afghanistan so we provided
00:17:17
them with stingers but it wasn't a u.s
00:17:18
flag on the box and we didn't draw you
00:17:20
know it wasn't us flags on the trucks we
00:17:23
there were a certain set of rules by
00:17:25
which we engaged in to avoid the risk of
00:17:27
world war three with the russians do you
00:17:29
feel that's not the case now i think
00:17:31
it's i know because we have now defined
00:17:33
our objectives in a much more expansive
00:17:35
way and i'll let glenn speak for himself
00:17:36
because i think he would not go as far
00:17:38
as me i'm sort of
00:17:39
i'm willing to do a little bit more but
00:17:41
um but no i mean look you have the
00:17:44
president united states saying
00:17:46
that he wants to basically topple putin
00:17:49
you've got austin saying that our
00:17:50
objectives here go beyond ukraine it's
00:17:53
basically to kick russia out of the
00:17:54
league of great powers and moreover
00:17:57
you've got the state department
00:17:58
declaring that we're in a global
00:17:59
struggle between autocracy and democracy
00:18:02
so we've defined the struggle in
00:18:04
manichaean terms and if somehow ukraine
00:18:06
were to lose there's like there's a
00:18:08
domino theory where dictators are going
00:18:09
to take over the whole globe and so i
00:18:11
think we've invested ukraine i would
00:18:14
give them
00:18:15
some help but i would not allow the
00:18:18
we no american president has ever
00:18:20
claimed that the united states has a
00:18:22
vital national interest in ukraine name
00:18:25
of the president has done it before can
00:18:26
i
00:18:28
so first of all
00:18:29
at the start of every war that we fought
00:18:32
over the last 60 years the same climate
00:18:34
if we were in the united states would
00:18:35
prevail as the one that's in this room
00:18:37
every time some comment was made that
00:18:38
the united states is on the right side
00:18:40
we're actually doing the right thing
00:18:41
we're fighting on behalf of everybody in
00:18:43
the auditorium
00:18:44
a pod it's really good it's a good
00:18:46
feeling to feel like your country your
00:18:48
government is doing something deeply
00:18:50
moral so again i just want to show and
00:18:53
maybe you know this doesn't matter
00:18:56
because you think that most other
00:18:58
countries are
00:18:59
primitive or arrogant or immersed in
00:19:02
propaganda and we're we're not but here
00:19:05
are the top 20 countries by population
00:19:08
and the ones in yellow are the ones who
00:19:10
refuse to support the u.n resolution
00:19:12
expelling russia
00:19:14
from
00:19:15
the un human rights council and you can
00:19:17
see that it's nine out of the ten
00:19:19
most populous countries that are on the
00:19:21
opposite side of all the cheering that's
00:19:22
taking place in this auditorium this is
00:19:25
exactly what has repeated itself every
00:19:27
time we've gone to war in vietnam in
00:19:29
iraq in afghanistan in libya in syria
00:19:33
all americans across the board 80
00:19:36
percent 85 are on board with the war in
00:19:38
the beginning because it feels so good
00:19:40
to believe your country is going to
00:19:42
where to do something positive and then
00:19:44
six months later or a year later or five
00:19:47
years later every single one of those
00:19:49
wars overwhelming majority say it was a
00:19:52
huge mistake that at least to me would
00:19:54
cause some humility to ask why does that
00:19:57
pattern keep repeating itself
00:19:59
why am i as american an american always
00:20:02
so susceptible to cheering my
00:20:04
government's involvement in a war when
00:20:06
the rest of the world is telling you
00:20:09
that actually you're being propagandized
00:20:11
that the motive the united states
00:20:12
government is claiming to have which is
00:20:14
defending democracy is not actually
00:20:16
their motive as illustrated by i don't
00:20:19
know why the rule is we're not allowed
00:20:21
to evaluate other things the united
00:20:23
states is doing to determine whether
00:20:25
those motives are real like what we do
00:20:27
in saudi arabia or what we do in yemen
00:20:29
it seems like if someone comes to you
00:20:31
and claims that they're acting with a
00:20:33
certain motive to determine whether
00:20:34
that's really the motive you'd want to
00:20:36
look at the history of that person and
00:20:38
whether their behavior is consistent
00:20:40
with that motive that's what the rest of
00:20:42
the world is doing and the reason why
00:20:44
they find these propagandist claims of
00:20:47
the united states so preposterous
00:20:49
because so many of them have been
00:20:51
victimized by the united states
00:20:53
overthrowing their democratically
00:20:55
elected governments not in the distant
00:20:57
past but in the recent ones here's the
00:21:00
next uh 10 most populous countries 6 out
00:21:02
of 10
00:21:03
also deviates from the us position and
00:21:06
then as far as what david was saying
00:21:07
this was
00:21:09
barack obama so it's not what antonio
00:21:12
was saying people on the far left my
00:21:14
friend tucker carlson evil far right
00:21:16
people this is barack obama in 2016 on
00:21:20
his way out the door
00:21:21
he was confronted in a very lengthy
00:21:23
interview by jeffrey goldberg the
00:21:25
neoconservative editor-in-chief of the
00:21:26
atlantic who probably did more than
00:21:28
anybody else to convince americans to
00:21:31
support the war in iraq in 2002-3
00:21:34
by claiming that al-qaeda was in an
00:21:36
alliance with sodom hussein and he was
00:21:38
demanding to know why obama spent his
00:21:41
presidency refusing to arm the
00:21:43
ukrainians and refusing to confront
00:21:45
moscow and here's what jeffrey goldberg
00:21:48
in 2016
00:21:50
quoted obama as saying this is
00:21:51
goldberg's uh quote for obama quote
00:21:54
obama's theory here is simple
00:21:56
ukraine is a core russian interest but
00:22:00
not an american one so russia will
00:22:02
always be able to maintain escalatory
00:22:05
dominance there quote the fact is that
00:22:07
ukraine which is a non-nato country is
00:22:09
going to be vulnerable to military
00:22:10
domination by russia no matter what we
00:22:12
do it's realistic but this is an example
00:22:15
of where we have to be very clear about
00:22:17
what our core interests are and what we
00:22:19
are willing to go to war for and then
00:22:22
here is the
00:22:24
current cia director william burns who's
00:22:27
also not on the far left or part of the
00:22:31
far right who in 2008 in a memo to
00:22:34
condoleezza rice when the bush
00:22:35
administration wanted to expand nato up
00:22:37
to russian borders warned this is what
00:22:39
he wrote quote ukrainian entry into nato
00:22:42
is the brightest of all red lines for
00:22:44
the russian elite not just putin in more
00:22:47
than two and a half years of
00:22:48
conversations with key russian players
00:22:50
from knuckle draggers in the dark
00:22:52
recesses of the kremlin to putin's
00:22:54
sharpest liberal critics i have yet to
00:22:57
find anyone who views ukraine and nato
00:22:59
as anything other than a direct
00:23:01
challenge to russian interests this has
00:23:03
been conventional wisdom in washington
00:23:05
up until february 24th when it suddenly
00:23:08
became taboo to talk about russia
00:23:11
views ukraine as the most vital interest
00:23:13
to it because it was twice used by
00:23:16
germany to invade russia in the 20th
00:23:17
century and virtually destroy it and
00:23:19
that ukraine never has been and never
00:23:22
will be of vital interest to the united
00:23:26
states okay let me let's go to antonio
00:23:28
okay give him a chance okay glenn i
00:23:29
think that arguments on it better than
00:23:30
the original russian to be honest i mean
00:23:32
i don't know why you're sitting here
00:23:33
citing six-year-old atlantic pieces
00:23:34
about obama are you going to address the
00:23:36
reality what we're talking about in that
00:23:37
list of nations by the way you included
00:23:39
such human rights luminaries as iran and
00:23:41
china as having voted against it let me
00:23:42
ask you a direct question should russia
00:23:44
be sitting on the u.n human rights
00:23:46
council a country that routinely
00:23:47
incarcerates journalists and has a
00:23:49
heinous human rights record i mean the
00:23:50
quote
00:23:51
if you look at who else is on the human
00:23:53
rights council like the united states
00:23:55
like you're always what about it just
00:23:56
answer the question it's not what about
00:23:58
ism to say you have to look at what the
00:24:01
rest of the world is doing in order to
00:24:03
understand the moral framework why is it
00:24:05
that the united states that still has
00:24:07
people in guantanamo for 20 years with
00:24:09
no trial that destroyed the country of
00:24:11
iraq a country of 25 million people that
00:24:14
is the created the worst humanitarian
00:24:16
crisis in yemen that is imprisoning
00:24:18
journalists like julian assange with no
00:24:20
charges for over a decade now has any
00:24:22
moral credibility to say we are morally
00:24:25
superior i know it feels good to say
00:24:27
that but the reality is the united
00:24:30
states if you look at what it's actually
00:24:31
doing which is going around the world
00:24:33
and has always done this supporting
00:24:35
tyranny not supporting democracy
00:24:37
propping up despots not fighting them
00:24:40
if you want to believe that there's a
00:24:42
way to go into ukraine and defend the
00:24:45
ukrainians and all of that i believe
00:24:47
that that's what you want to do but it
00:24:49
would be incredibly naive to refuse to
00:24:51
ask ourselves whether that's really the
00:24:53
goal of the united states given
00:24:55
everything we know about the government
00:24:57
and if the goal of the united states is
00:24:59
not the benevolent one that you hope
00:25:00
they have and that you have but it
00:25:02
instead is a different one
00:25:04
namely not to defend ukraine and
00:25:06
ukrainians but to sacrifice ukraine in
00:25:09
pursuit of this broader geopolitical
00:25:11
goal that david mentioned that they're
00:25:13
now admitting which is to weaken russia
00:25:15
and bring about regime change then
00:25:17
you're cheering for a war that is
00:25:19
completely different than the war that
00:25:20
is actually being fought no i disagree
00:25:22
and i think i think you've spent too
00:25:23
long in plato's cave of twitter and you
00:25:25
don't you don't stare at reality anymore
00:25:27
to be quiet no no what i showed you
00:25:28
excuse me twitter not what i just showed
00:25:30
you came from twitter yeah it came from
00:25:31
the six-year-old atlantic piece it's
00:25:32
even less relevant just this week the
00:25:35
finnish and swedish parliaments voted to
00:25:37
join nato why is that your your argument
00:25:40
is completely backwards russia's not
00:25:42
aggressive
00:25:43
hold on hold on let me finish the
00:25:44
thought right right no hold on russia
00:25:46
let me respond to the point that you sat
00:25:48
there for two minutes staring at russia
00:25:49
is not surrounded by nato
00:25:51
russia isn't aggressive because it's
00:25:52
surrounded by nato it's surrounded by
00:25:54
nato because it's aggressive okay and
00:25:56
countries like finland and sweden have
00:25:57
been living under the russian boot and
00:25:59
finland most of all knows it from the
00:26:00
winter war and that threat has been
00:26:02
there constantly so
00:26:03
again what do you know that the finnish
00:26:05
and swedish parliaments who are trying
00:26:07
to make a decision for their people
00:26:08
don't know right if i were a country and
00:26:10
i and the and and i had the option to
00:26:12
have the richest and most powerful
00:26:14
country with the biggest military tell
00:26:17
me that if anyone invades you i'm gonna
00:26:19
go into war and fight against you i
00:26:21
would say yeah i would love that also
00:26:22
that sounds like a really great thing of
00:26:24
course every country would love to have
00:26:26
a pledge from the world's greatest
00:26:27
military that if anyone are you
00:26:28
seriously saying that countries would
00:26:30
line up to be ukraine
00:26:31
what do you know what do you know
00:26:33
about united the united states
00:26:35
intentions that all of the countries i
00:26:37
just showed you not including tyrannies
00:26:40
many of which are on the united states
00:26:42
side but many democracies who have had
00:26:44
their democracy subverted by the united
00:26:45
states who are saying we do not believe
00:26:48
the united states is well intentioned
00:26:49
that every time the united states
00:26:51
involves itself in a war it convinces
00:26:53
its own citizens that it's going to do
00:26:55
benevolent things but the reality is
00:26:57
exactly the opposite what do you know
00:26:59
that the entire rest of the world
00:27:00
doesn't it's not the entire rest of the
00:27:02
world the europeans
00:27:03
the europeans who are close to the
00:27:04
conflict completely disagree with you
00:27:06
the danes the cuddly little danes are
00:27:07
seeing left lethal aids ukraine first my
00:27:09
own country the spanish are us and
00:27:11
europeans are let's make shift gears i
00:27:13
want to get another aspect of this topic
00:27:14
so
00:27:15
um let's let's start with you antonio
00:27:18
what is the outcome that you would like
00:27:19
to see here and um
00:27:22
you know right now the way that victory
00:27:24
is being defined
00:27:27
by ukraine and by
00:27:30
our state department is that
00:27:32
we kick russia out of ukraine maybe even
00:27:36
crimea too that's the official policy
00:27:38
and maybe we destabilize and topple
00:27:40
putin
00:27:41
i mean where wh
00:27:43
where's the like what do you what's the
00:27:45
outcome that you think our objective
00:27:47
should be here my ideal outcome is
00:27:49
whatever the ukrainians want for
00:27:50
themselves which
00:27:52
seems to be
00:27:54
if you listen to them
00:27:56
seems to be a liberal democratic ukraine
00:27:58
that wants to join the greater eu
00:28:00
western sphere if you look at the the
00:28:02
maidan protest in 2015 this is when
00:28:04
everyone kind of revolted against the
00:28:06
the pro-russian leader at the time and
00:28:07
there were civilian shootings and if you
00:28:09
talk to ukrainians i mean there's been
00:28:10
200 years or longer of ukrainian sort of
00:28:12
nationalism kind of brewing but the
00:28:14
2014-2015 protests were really a
00:28:16
formative period where the ukrainians
00:28:18
really said this is it we've got our own
00:28:20
country and if you talk to them they're
00:28:21
like we've had seven years of democracy
00:28:22
we're not giving it up now right and if
00:28:24
you look at things like the mass graves
00:28:26
discovered abuca when the russians
00:28:27
pulled back they look at that and they
00:28:28
say if we fail that's the future that
00:28:30
awaits us right so they want the
00:28:32
opposite of that
00:28:33
apparently 80 to 90 of the population in
00:28:35
crimea is russian and wants to be part
00:28:38
of russia does that go back to ukraine
00:28:40
or does that go to russia
00:28:42
it's a good question but the ukrainians
00:28:45
under zielinski believe that crimea
00:28:47
belongs to them so is he wrong about
00:28:49
that
00:28:50
doesn't the principle of
00:28:51
self-determination mean that those
00:28:53
peoples should get to decide which
00:28:55
country they go with
00:28:56
i mean that's as much a question for
00:28:58
crimea as it is catalunya in spain i
00:28:59
mean uh
00:29:00
you want me to speak for the lens
00:29:02
but but the russians have a naval base
00:29:04
at sevastopol that gives them control
00:29:06
over the black sea and if you tell them
00:29:08
that
00:29:09
that what ukrainian victory means here
00:29:11
as they get kicked out of that naval
00:29:13
base and lose control of the black sea
00:29:16
you have threatened them existentially
00:29:18
and you know their policy with regard to
00:29:21
nuclear weapons is it's allowed if their
00:29:23
nation is existentially threatened so we
00:29:26
are playing with fire here is that an
00:29:27
objective that we are willing to risk a
00:29:29
nuclear war for
00:29:31
as we did in cuba with nuclear weapons
00:29:32
there
00:29:34
i don't think we should be so
00:29:36
we need to define our objectives here in
00:29:38
a more limited way than just whatever
00:29:39
the ukrainians say but here's the
00:29:41
reality right again this is one of the
00:29:43
things you get into american political
00:29:44
discourse everything isn't downstream of
00:29:46
american decision this will come down to
00:29:48
the fortunes of war on the ground in
00:29:49
ukraine which is partially a function of
00:29:51
how much it would give them obviously
00:29:52
yes and we can put strings on those
00:29:54
weapons right
00:29:56
40 billion of weapons are going there
00:29:57
and it's just this month's delivery
00:30:00
so i mean and it's a good question to
00:30:01
ask what happens to those weapons after
00:30:03
which i'm sure is a concern do you
00:30:05
believe our state department is working
00:30:07
for a negotiated peace
00:30:09
i don't know the inner workings of the
00:30:10
state department but should they be
00:30:13
no i think the worst stops in the
00:30:14
ukrainians wanted to stop
00:30:16
glad your views
00:30:18
there's so many countries all over the
00:30:20
world who want the united states to do
00:30:22
things that we don't that we don't do
00:30:24
for them the yemenis have been begging
00:30:27
the united states for six years to stop
00:30:30
sending huge amounts of weaponry and
00:30:32
intelligence to
00:30:33
the the saudis and you can say oh yeah
00:30:35
yemen is a totally different country
00:30:37
yemen's a different country but it's
00:30:39
still the united states government and
00:30:40
it is extremely disturbing to me i have
00:30:42
to say
00:30:43
that we suddenly seem to care so much
00:30:46
about the lives of
00:30:48
ukrainians and seem to care very little
00:30:52
about the lives of all the countries in
00:30:53
which we ourselves are the aggressors
00:30:56
and you can say well that's a completely
00:30:58
different issue but it's not a
00:31:00
completely different issue because what
00:31:01
the united what the outcome is of the
00:31:03
united states's role in ukraine is
00:31:05
determined by the us motive and what you
00:31:08
have to do to look at what the us motive
00:31:10
is is not pick the rhetoric that makes
00:31:13
you feel good we're on the side of
00:31:15
liberation that's what george bush said
00:31:17
in his 2003 state of the union speech
00:31:19
we're going to iraq because we love
00:31:21
democracy and we're going to liberate
00:31:23
the iraqi people from saddam hussein
00:31:25
that's what lyndon johnson said about
00:31:27
why we're getting involved in the war in
00:31:29
vietnam we love the south vietnamese
00:31:31
democrats and we're going there to
00:31:32
protect them from the south vietnamese
00:31:35
communists maybe if that had been true
00:31:37
those words would have had much
00:31:38
different outcomes but that wasn't the
00:31:40
reason that was the propagandistic
00:31:42
pretense and so to refuse to say i'm
00:31:45
going to interrogate the authenticity of
00:31:47
what u.s motives are is it just wash
00:31:50
your hands of the reality of the war
00:31:52
instead of what you hope the war is and
00:31:55
and that's
00:31:56
given antonio the last word yeah
00:31:58
okay right
00:31:59
we're good i'm gonna give you the last
00:32:00
one we're gonna give antonio the last
00:32:02
word since he was a little bit outgunned
00:32:03
here uh not outgunned because you did
00:32:05
more than fine on your own but there was
00:32:07
a little bit of two on one so we're
00:32:08
gonna give interview a lot david what
00:32:10
what were you guys talking about
00:32:12
somalia apparently or yemen apparently
00:32:14
but anyhow so when i was coming back
00:32:15
from ukraine and i was crossing back and
00:32:17
suddenly i was obviously i wasn't really
00:32:18
a refugee but i was in the refugee line
00:32:20
along with all the ukrainians leaving
00:32:21
and you're at the border it's the middle
00:32:22
of nowhere by the way it's not like a
00:32:24
big city or anything and you saw a sign
00:32:26
in polish that said you're entering
00:32:27
poland and the eu flag right and as a
00:32:29
new citizen that flag never really meant
00:32:30
much to me but and again not that my
00:32:33
time in ukraine was that bad but it did
00:32:34
feel precarious and it was a war zone
00:32:36
and sirens going off and all that stuff
00:32:38
to go back to what seemed like an
00:32:39
ordered liberal world seemed magical to
00:32:41
me i had the same feeling i went to
00:32:42
report on cuba on the internet years ago
00:32:44
for wired magazine and when i landed at
00:32:46
miami airport here was like man god
00:32:48
bless america i'm glad to be back here
00:32:49
there's a certain order and and rules to
00:32:51
life i think the global liberal order is
00:32:54
real and i think those who tend to [ __ ]
00:32:56
on it or at least question its value are
00:32:58
those that typically tend not to live
00:33:00
outside of it for one and undervalue its
00:33:02
importance in the world ladies and
00:33:04
gentlemen a debate for the ages well
00:33:06
done
00:33:15
[Music]
00:33:23
it to the fans and they've just gone
00:33:24
crazy with it
00:33:29
[Music]
00:33:34
besties
00:33:36
[Music]
00:33:48
it's like this like sexual tension but
00:33:50
they just need
00:33:51
[Music]
00:33:58
we need to get these
00:34:01
[Music]
00:34:07
i'm going on
00:34:09
[Music]

Episode Highlights

  • The Refugee Crisis in Ukraine
    Antonio Garcia Martinez shares his firsthand experience witnessing the immense refugee situation in Ukraine, highlighting the staggering number of displaced individuals.
    “The human situation is just kind of mind-boggling.”
    @ 03m 48s
    May 25, 2022
  • Ukrainian Resolve
    Antonio emphasizes the underestimated determination of Ukrainians in the face of war, challenging common narratives.
    “I realized that the big mistake was underrating Ukrainian resolve.”
    @ 04m 50s
    May 25, 2022
  • The Nature of War
    Glenn Greenwald discusses the inherent atrocities of war, stressing that all conflicts involve extreme suffering.
    “War is the worst thing that humanity can unleash upon itself.”
    @ 09m 56s
    May 25, 2022
  • Perception of the Ukraine War
    Glenn argues that the media's focus on Ukrainian victims creates an imbalance in understanding global conflicts.
    “There's really nothing extraordinary about what's taking place in that war.”
    @ 11m 41s
    May 25, 2022
  • The Illusion of Moral Superiority
    The speaker questions America's moral credibility in foreign conflicts, highlighting past failures.
    “The reality is the United States is supporting tyranny, not democracy.”
    @ 24m 33s
    May 25, 2022
  • Defining Objectives in Ukraine
    A discussion on the need for clearer, limited objectives in the Ukraine conflict.
    “We need to define our objectives here in a more limited way.”
    @ 29m 36s
    May 25, 2022
  • The Global Liberal Order
    A reflection on the importance of the global liberal order and its perceived value.
    “The global liberal order is real and important in the world.”
    @ 32m 54s
    May 25, 2022

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Ukraine Debate00:04
  • Refugee Situation02:49
  • Ukrainian Resolve04:46
  • War Atrocities10:04
  • Media Narratives10:44
  • War Objectives29:36
  • Moral Dilemma30:42
  • Global Order Reflection32:54

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Podcast thumbnail
E100: Reflecting on the first 100 shows, fan questions, nuclear threat, markets, Amazon & more
Podcast thumbnail
E70: EMERGENCY POD! Russia invades Ukraine: Reactions, Putin's ambition, Biden's response and more
Podcast thumbnail
Break up Google, Starbucks CEO out, Kamala’s price controls, Boeing disaster, Kursk offensive
Podcast thumbnail
E65: VC markup dynamics, Russia/US tensions over Ukraine, Altos Labs raises $3B, Stripe mafia & more
Podcast thumbnail
#AIS: Glenn Greenwald & Matt Taibbi discuss the new political divide, moderated by David Sacks
Podcast thumbnail
E173: Google buying HubSpot? FTX depositors not made whole, AI job fears, Ukraine joining NATO
Podcast thumbnail
E151: WW3 risk, War with Iran?, 4.9% GDP, startup failures growing, new Speaker & more
Podcast thumbnail
E102: Elon closes Twitter deal, $META uncertainty, Zuck's historic bet, big tech decline & more