Search Captions & Ask AI

Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot

February 13, 2026 / 01:05:50

This episode of Pivot covers topics such as subscription cancellations, the impact of social media on addiction, and the ongoing Epstein hearings. Hosts Cara Swisher and Scott Galloway discuss the economic consequences of unsubscribing from tech platforms, referencing Chelsea Handler's influence on user behavior.

They highlight how individual actions, like unsubscribing, can significantly affect companies' market valuations, with Galloway providing specific examples of financial impacts. The conversation shifts to the testimony of Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding the Epstein case, where she faced criticism for her handling of sensitive information.

Swisher and Galloway also address the trial against Meta and YouTube, focusing on the addictive nature of their platforms and the implications for young users. They discuss the alarming statistics regarding teen addiction to social media and its correlation with mental health issues.

The episode concludes with reflections on the broader implications of surveillance technology and the responsibilities of tech companies in protecting user privacy. The hosts emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in the tech industry.

TLDR

Hosts discuss subscription cancellations' economic impact, social media addiction, and the Epstein hearings' implications.

Episode

1:05:50
00:00:00
I'm glad they got these pictures of this guy. At the same time, this is an edge
00:00:04
case. They're they're keeping your video that which I which everyone thought they
00:00:08
were doing and they said they weren't. >> Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York
00:00:18
Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Cara Swisser. >> And I'm Scott Galloway.
00:00:22
>> Scott, we just did a great on with Cara Swisser about resist and unsubscribe,
00:00:27
but I'd like >> you have another podcast. Did I find that out? This >> dude, you were quite substantive. Where
00:00:32
are we right now? Give us a quick update. >> Uh, it lulled Tuesday and Wednesday. It
00:00:36
appears to have come back today because Chelsea Handler, who reached out to me, posted something of all the things she
00:00:43
was unsubscribing to. And just to give you an example of how much impact one person can have. Uh, I went on AI, I
00:00:50
went on to my site analytics. I think she just that one video she did on Instagram, that one post is going to
00:00:55
inspire 6 to 7,000 unique site visits. conversion of 5% that's 300 people unsubscribing average of two platforms
00:01:04
600 unsubscribes average 200 that's $12,000 times or excuse me $120,000 times 10 so
00:01:12
$1.2 $2 million in market cap getting taken out of these companies because of one Insta Post. So,
00:01:17
>> Right. Exactly. And, you know, I'm going to see her uh tomorrow night, I think.
00:01:22
Um, tomorrow night. She's here in DC. We should get them all to do things like
00:01:26
that. Let's let's reach into the celebs, we know, and get them to do. >> I'm going to bug them all.
00:01:32
>> Okay. >> I like it. Thank you. >> Yeah. If they do that and put even just
00:01:35
one thing up, it matters and it's an easy thing for a lot of them. And they >> what people don't realize about about
00:01:40
economic protests, the most famous one was a Montgomery bus strike. It wasn't
00:01:44
the one cinematic moment. It was it was um an organization of thousands of car pools over the course of a year.
00:01:50
>> Yeah. >> So it takes it takes a while, but >> any individual who subs unsubscribes
00:01:56
from Open AI OpenAI right now is taking $10,000 out of their market valuation, >> which is great. And that
00:02:02
>> and there's a substitute, the free the free chat GBT >> and also all kinds of other free
00:02:07
services. Gemini, all the others, you don't have to pay for it necessarily. And by the way, you can use things for
00:02:13
free. You're taking stuff from them, right, without paying them. Like paying
00:02:17
is the issue is what you pay for. So just keep that in mind. Everyone's like,
00:02:20
"Oh, now I can't use Google." I'm like, "No, it's free."
00:02:24
>> Well, just just to give an example how how these this unsubscribes to these
00:02:27
recurring revenue tech platforms or tech companies, T-Mobile just had an earnings
00:02:33
call. They were projected to add 992,000 new subscribers. they added 962. So 30,000 fewer because 30,000 people
00:02:42
didn't show up for subscription. So not only do these do these actions punch
00:02:46
above their weight class in terms of economic impact, if you take if Sam Alman is grows his subscriptions 7 12%
00:02:55
versus 8% month, he's not going to close his $850 billion round. >> Yep.
00:03:01
>> So this is literally this is the string. If you if if you don't have the time or
00:03:06
the energy to do some of the very other important work, whether it's protests or
00:03:09
or or calling your congressman, you can have a massive impact by unsubscribing right now.
00:03:15
>> Yeah, you can. Now, speaking of which, and something the administration does
00:03:18
care about, Attorney General Pam Bondi, who we'll talk about more in a minute,
00:03:21
was testifying in front of the the Jan, crazy Jan, was testifying in front of Congress about Epstein on Wednesday. She
00:03:28
made it clear she'd prefer to be talking about other things. What did she zero in
00:03:31
on? Let's listen. Dow is over $50,000. I don't know why you're laughing. You're a
00:03:37
great stock trader as I hear rascin. The Dow is over $50,000 right now. The S&P at almost 7,000
00:03:46
and the NASDAQ smashing records. Americans 401ks and retirement savings are booming. That's what we should be
00:03:56
talking about. >> Well, she's not the Treasury Secretary, but this is what shows what they care
00:04:00
about. They really do. the fact that it was inappropriate to bring this up in here given they were talking about
00:04:05
victims sexual uh uh abuse victims, but nonetheless, this is what floats their boat is is this money, right? And so,
00:04:14
let's also listen to a great idea one of our listeners sent in. >> Every child of an elderly person should
00:04:21
also go through all of their parents subscriptions. I went through my mother's this weekend and was able to
00:04:28
take $125 off of some bills by unsubscribing subscriptions she didn't even know she
00:04:35
had. >> That is a great idea. I do that with my mom all the time and I'm trying very
00:04:39
hard to take the New York Post off of her subscriptions. >> Two years after my mother died, I found
00:04:44
that Geico was still taking $220 out of her bank account a month for car insurance.
00:04:50
>> Wow. Crazy. if you don't, and I've used this example before, when I unsubscribed
00:04:54
from AT&T, went to Noble, I'm saving about 20 or 30 bucks a month, but in
00:04:58
addition, I found out >> I had four accounts with AT&T for Blackberries and iPads, which have been
00:05:03
in landfills for years, cuz I never went on and unsubscribed them. And even though they know they're not getting a
00:05:08
GPS signal from these things, and they could send you an email saying, "Hey,
00:05:11
you know, you're paying 70 bucks a month >> for something you haven't used in 5
00:05:15
years, >> you're going to save money. It's these companies are very good at figuring out
00:05:19
a way to get you to subscribe and get you to forget that it's coming that this
00:05:23
money is coming out of your pocket every month. >> Yeah. You know, there's a couple
00:05:25
services and I don't have the names to show where your subscriptions are and to
00:05:29
unsubscribe, but this is a better way to do it. But then you can use those services to find them all over the
00:05:34
place. You'd be surprised of what you're I found an AT&T thing. I was still from
00:05:38
when Apple first had the iPhone when they had unlimited if you remember. Anyway, uh it's a great thing to do.
00:05:44
Keep going. We're going to do more. We're gonna every little thing we can
00:05:47
pull on. The administration cares about this issue. Uh it's the only thing left
00:05:51
is the DAO at this point. The fallout from the >> What's that $50,000? She's the [ __ ]
00:05:56
attorney general. She clearly knows nothing about economics. What is she talking about? She called the Dow.
00:06:02
>> I know. Also, also calling a representative Rascin. Who does [ __ ] does she think she is? She's in his
00:06:08
house. She's in his house. He calls him Rascin. I'm going to call you Galloway
00:06:12
when I use your house. Hey, Galloway. Anyway, the fallout from the Epstein files continues. Speaking of which, as I
00:06:18
mentioned, crazy Attorney General Pam Bondi, who really needs to be medicated, testified before the House Judiciary
00:06:25
Committee on Wednesday, and things got heated. She soiled herself multiple times. Um, Bondie sparred with
00:06:31
Democrats, not just Democrats, over DH's handling of the Epstein files and refused to apologize to survivors. She
00:06:37
wouldn't even look at them there. It turned out she's never talked to them.
00:06:40
She also clashed with uh GOP Congressman Thomas Massie. Massie criticized Bondi and the DOJ for failing to redact
00:06:46
victim's names while blacking out the names of businessmen uh businessman Les
00:06:50
Wexner. Let's listen to the exchange. >> Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was
00:06:56
added back >> within 40 minutes of me catching you redhanded. >> Red hand. There was one redaction out
00:07:06
and we invited you in. We This guy has Trump derangement syndrome. He needs to get You're a failed politician.
00:07:14
Uh really crazy crazy craziness I have to say. I just don't know what to say.
00:07:19
She's What is wrong with her? Like ser speaking of derangement syndrome. Like
00:07:25
honestly I don't know what she was doing up there. I know it's an audience of one
00:07:29
but he can't even find this impressive. It's grotesque. I mean I don't know.
00:07:35
>> Yeah. It really feels like we have >> wheels are coming off. I mean it's it's
00:07:39
it's a shame because it's just so >> it's a serious issue >> weird and it's the attorney general
00:07:46
making a mockery of the institution and just u no no decorum but for I'm curious what
00:07:54
you thought about the hearings but the moment that I found really chilling was when I think it was representative
00:08:02
Jaipal had um some of the the survivors uh stand up and asked how many of them have
00:08:10
reached out to the DOJ >> to provide evidence or input, but all these survivors stood up.
00:08:16
>> Yeah. >> And it was clear they've reached out to the DOJ and the DOJ has um has is has
00:08:22
ignored them. And you thought, let me get this, the Department of Justice >> investigating what is arguably may go
00:08:28
down as the crime of the century to date >> and survivors and people with direct
00:08:33
knowledge about what happened or what didn't happen. They could also, quite frankly, they might exonerate some
00:08:38
people. >> Right. Exactly. >> They don't want to talk to them. >> Right. Right. And she wouldn't look at
00:08:42
them. That was another moment. She wouldn't turn around. She wouldn't do
00:08:46
it. She This woman is insane. I just I don't She a crazy one. She's like, it
00:08:52
was so strange. And And I know this audience of one they always do, but in this case, I was like, "Wow, you people
00:08:57
are desperate and terrified of what's coming next for you." You know, I
00:09:01
thought Massie was effective. I thought Becca Balant was effective. I thought Gipol's effective, Rascin, um I thought
00:09:08
they all one of the things someone who works there said, "How do you think it
00:09:11
went?" And I said, "The only problem with this kind of thing was you lay down
00:09:17
with pigs. The only one only people that like wrestling with pigs are the pigs, right? If you get in the mud with them."
00:09:23
But I thought they rel they relatively handle it well. It's just that the the
00:09:27
craziness is what gets attention and not the victims, right? It becomes a ridiculous circus. And on some level,
00:09:33
what was interesting is Fox didn't show it, right? They they they they keep they're obsessed with the Nancy Nancy
00:09:39
Guthrie kidnapping, which is a terrible thing, too. But they're not even airing
00:09:43
it. They don't want to see show you the crazy like and any normal person looking
00:09:47
at this would be like, "What? Honey, you need some you need some therapy like
00:09:52
stat kind of thing." And you're you know, and what happened to you? So, I
00:09:56
thought that was it was a really interesting This Epste thing isn't going away, Pam. I'm sorry. It's just not now
00:10:01
cuz it's so very clear that you didn't do your job and neither did people
00:10:05
before you, by the way. But guess what? >> It's a valid point. >> You're in the chair now. I don't really
00:10:10
>> It's her It's her DOJ. >> It's her DOJ >> and her boss her boss is mentioned
00:10:15
>> in the Epstein files more times than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible or the
00:10:19
term meth is mentioned in Breaking Bad over eight seasons. And I felt like every day, every time yesterday, she
00:10:25
>> she claimed that, you know, the president had been the most quote unquote transparent president. When she
00:10:30
uses the term transparent, I think some somewhere there's a thesaurus filing for
00:10:34
protective custody. It's just >> why are you laughing at me was just and al just it's it was so weird. It's
00:10:43
so weird. It's so culty. It's so strange. One of the things I do think is
00:10:46
effective is a lot of these Congress people are going in and seeing unredacted versions which are very
00:10:50
upsetting. um >> when they come out and they look like they've seen a ghost.
00:10:54
>> I know. Even Cynthia Lumis who was I didn't know it was there now. Whoa.
00:10:59
Whoa. Folks, like Cynthia Lumis, I'm so glad she's leaving politics. But I have
00:11:04
to say, even someone like that who literally puts in the least effort possible. Um same thing. They're looking
00:11:10
like, "Oh my [ __ ] god, you're kidding me here." And you know, nobody's
00:11:14
>> I got to be honest. I didn't I didn't realize it was this bad. >> Yeah. when the more information you you
00:11:20
read about this >> Yeah. >> in terms of the number of victims. >> Yeah.
00:11:25
>> In terms of how many people were involved, uh how many >> how many opportunities there were to
00:11:31
stop it. >> Yeah. >> And it just gets the web keeps getting deeper and uglier.
00:11:36
>> Yes. And the lies like when commerce secretary Howard Letic was on Capital
00:11:39
Hill this week as well. He told the Senate committee he and his family had lunch on Epstein's island in 2012, but
00:11:44
insisted he'd not have a relationship with him. Of course, this was he had given this sort of haha interview with
00:11:50
one of these right-wing outfits where he said, "I never in that." >> He was indignant. I was disgusted by him
00:11:56
and I said, "We're never we're going to have no contact with him again." And
00:12:00
here's the thing. >> He took his kids. I I I took my four kids and their nannies and I got all the
00:12:05
kids off the island. That by >> But this is the thing. It's not It's
00:12:09
It's not It's usually not the the infraction itself. It's the cover up. If
00:12:13
he had said, >> why'd he say the first thing? That's >> But if he had just said right up front,
00:12:18
he's a neighbor. He had powerful friends. I didn't do the diligence I should have. I went with me and my kids
00:12:23
to his island once cuz it sounded like fun. >> Yeah. >> Okay. Poor judgment, but go along, get
00:12:29
along. >> Instead of trying to wrap yourself in some sort of indignance that you
00:12:33
immedately smelled a rat and you're lying >> and you decided to >> I mean, if he just come clean in the
00:12:40
beginning, said like, "Yeah, it was bad judgment. took my kids to his island,
00:12:43
had a lunch. I'd heard he was a big philanthropist and who knows maybe it was okay. All right. Bad judgment. Move
00:12:51
along. But it again, it's the cover. >> He had to take a laugh. He had to take a
00:12:56
I'm so pure laugh. And he that's cuz he's a [ __ ] Let's let's be clear. This
00:13:00
guy's a [ __ ] And people are asking for him to resign. He really is a liar. He's
00:13:03
a liar and a [ __ ] And it doesn't mean he had to do anything, but he's a liar
00:13:08
and a [ __ ] The one that one that's interesting under scrutiny is entertainment executive Casey Wasserman.
00:13:14
Chapel Rowan and other artists have cut ties with Wasserman as is their right after latest file show exchanged emails
00:13:19
was Julian Maxwell seemed to have some kind of relationship with her probably extramarital who knows who serves as
00:13:26
chairman of the LA Olympics organized appears to be holding on to that role. They're backing him. There were other
00:13:31
names floated to take his place. He let me be clear for people not letting him out but it was 2003 before any of this
00:13:38
was known. He may have been able to pick it up. That's different. Um but uh but
00:13:43
this was well before the first conviction, the first um sweetheart deal that Epstein did with in Florida. Um so
00:13:52
he's even even he's under scrutiny and people are cutting ties. And again, this
00:13:57
is this artist right. They don't like the cut of his jib. That's perfectly
00:14:00
fine. In his case, there's just the the blast zone of this is so far right. It's
00:14:06
really >> it's so indiscriminate. And again, I go to the following. >> Yeah.
00:14:10
>> If we had an institution we could trust, including the Department of Justice and
00:14:14
the institutions that actually assembled these files, if they could go through it
00:14:17
and go, "Okay, there are three circles here. There's people who either engaged
00:14:22
in provided infrastructure or trafficked and facilitated crimes, we are going to
00:14:27
release those names in the form of grand jury indictments, and we're going to go
00:14:31
after these people." That's the headline here. That's what the Department of
00:14:34
Justice isn't supposed to ruin people's careers. It's supposed to create an
00:14:37
incentive system where people follow the law by prosecuting criminals and exonerating people who are not guilty.
00:14:43
That is what they are there to do. And then the second circle, and this is a harder one, is okay, if a cabinet, if a
00:14:50
cabinet member has clearly lied under their testimony or under oath, should they release that information? Didn't
00:14:56
didn't commit a crime. This is Howard Lutnik. Should the president, who has not so far been accused of a crime, if
00:15:02
he's mentioned in this thing 6,000 times, should we release that information? I think that is a really
00:15:08
important point. The biggest circle, quite frankly, is go I have seen on Tik Tok and on Instagram people talking
00:15:16
about models, how they talked about going to a museum with Jeffrey Epstein and we should no longer uh have anything
00:15:24
to do. They're trying to shame all these people and it's like, you know what,
00:15:27
folks, that's just pure gossip. And unfortunately, the ring light shaming of
00:15:33
all these courageous, virtuous people when they're behind a a keyboard and have much higher standards for other
00:15:38
people than they do for themselves, that is distracting from what the Department
00:15:42
of Justice is supposed to do. And that has put pedophiles in prison. >> Yeah, I would urge people to read. It
00:15:48
was really interesting. you know, Kathy Katherine Rumler, who's the the legal
00:15:52
head of Goldman, you know, she was she had a lot of emails and very chummy kind of emails with Epstein going on for a
00:15:59
while. Um, I thought Bill Cohen did a great job talking about why she was in that relationship and most of it was in
00:16:08
fact she was professional. She's looking for work, right? And that's a whole
00:16:12
different >> guy who knows rich guys who can send me a for wealth management.
00:16:15
>> Yes, exactly. So I would urge people to read that and again one or two of them
00:16:20
and and one or two places she when he said oh I it was only prostitution she goes that's justice abusive Jeffrey like
00:16:27
she she unfortunately he kept saying there are gifts there was a business relationship I thought it was it was
00:16:32
actually a really um complex situation that made me think god if she was a guy and she did like golf with him she'd get
00:16:41
off because she was a woman was vaguely flirty kind of she wasn't like it was it
00:16:47
was a great piece cuz it made me rethink I was like okay like not great judgment
00:16:53
right should have known better should have stopped talking to him after the first thing um but didn't business it
00:17:01
was just interesting it was it made me think a lot I recommend Bill Cohen's column in pock and I thought this was
00:17:08
this is his area of expertise in finance and I thought okay I got this is why there she was he was trying to explain
00:17:14
why they haven't let her go, right? So, I thought that was interesting. Anyway,
00:17:18
um speaking of uh um power, six Republicans joined Democrats in the House on Wednesday to vote for a
00:17:23
resolution aimed at ending President Trump's tariffs on Canada that it's a
00:17:27
symbolic gesture, even if it clears the Senate. Uh Trump would veto it, but that
00:17:31
didn't stop him from making threats. Trump posted on True Social, that any Republican who votes against the
00:17:35
terrorists would seriously uh suffer consequences come election time, and that includes primaries. Uh I think he's
00:17:41
losing the grip, as they say. What what do you think? >> Well, there's some new data that shows
00:17:46
that about So, the initial notion was the tariffs would uh mostly be paid by either
00:17:52
corporations, sort of a populist thing, or the uh uh importer or excuse me, the exporter themselves, the the country
00:18:01
would absorb it or whoever was sending the products. It ends up and there's finally analysis 94%
00:18:07
of the costs have been borne by US consumers and then the other 6% have been borne by companies either deciding
00:18:12
to take a bit of a hit or the the importer themselves or excuse me the exporter themselves reducing their
00:18:19
prices. You have about 15% of the economy is um imports. It they thought the tariffs average
00:18:27
around 20% so that's 3%. some managed to get out of it. So, call it a 2% to the
00:18:32
economy, but the problem is it's an unnecessary 2% hit to the economy. To be
00:18:37
fair, it hasn't had the catastrophic effect a lot of people thought it was going to have, but in a weird way.
00:18:44
>> Well, if Yeah, it's just >> I feel it myself and the shelves are
00:18:48
emptier. It's weird. I never have noticed that. >> Well, but why reduce people's prosperity
00:18:52
by 2% for no real reason? It doesn't cause growth. It doesn't cause innovation. And all it's doing is is is
00:18:58
urging or reconfiguring the supply chain >> around the United States. The EU is
00:19:02
entering into an agreement with Merkasaur. There all kinds of new trade zones being opened up such that people
00:19:08
are not as reliant on the US. And a weird a weird thing though is that if his tariffs are overturned
00:19:16
in by the Supreme Court or by the Congress, I actually think the markets will rip. So, in a weird way, it could
00:19:23
end up it could end up helping him if if these things are turned back. I think the markets will scream if these tariffs
00:19:31
are found to be uh illegal. >> Yeah. Well, we'll see. And although apparently he's got all these plans to
00:19:36
put other kinds of fees in place to take their place that are that he that he'll
00:19:41
have to go back to court and stop him for those. He's doubling down. This is
00:19:45
something he's talked about for years. So, I don't know if he's going to back
00:19:47
off so quickly and take the >> take the victory here. He'd like to take
00:19:52
the L. Honestly, >> I don't know. No, they you know that lunatic Peter Navaro talks about him
00:19:58
like that we have a whole bunch of things to happen if the Supreme Court >> overturns this. What's taking the
00:20:04
Supreme Court so long by the way? Anyway, uh we'll see what happens. I do think on the broader sense that there's
00:20:09
lots more um Republicans willing to push back because of their own political survival is not linked to Donald Trump
00:20:16
as much anymore. The other thing is it looks like they may lose control of the House.
00:20:20
>> That's right. Another person's resigning, right? >> So, you know, they're one they're one
00:20:25
sick person away from losing having the Democrats in control. So, it's a really
00:20:30
interesting time. He doesn't have the the power is slipping away and that's
00:20:33
why he screamy Pam or this nonsense and stuff. So we'll see more of that I think. Um okay Scott let's go on a quick
00:20:40
break. When we come back social media on trial very important case support for pivot comes from anthropic.
00:20:48
There are bumps in the road. The ones you can just throw a band-aid on and be done with it. And then there are the
00:20:53
bigger problems. The ones where you really have to stop and think through. The ones when you finally crack it feels
00:20:59
unbelievable. And for those problems, you're going to need a partner to help
00:21:02
you understand where you're at, where you're going, and how you're getting
00:21:05
there. Claude from Anthropic is that partner. Claude is the AI for minds that don't stop at good enough. It's a
00:21:12
collaborator that actually understands your entire workflow and thinks with you, whether you're debugging code at
00:21:17
midnight or strategizing your next business move. Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that
00:21:22
matter. Plus, Claude's research capabilities go deeper than basic web search. It can use comprehensive,
00:21:28
reliable analysis with proper citations, turning hours of research into minutes.
00:21:33
Ready to tackle bigger problems? Start with Claude today at claude.ai/pivot. That's claude.ai/pivot.
00:21:41
And check out Claude Pro, which includes access to all the features mentioned in
00:21:45
today's episode. Claude.ai/pivot. Support for the show comes from Corewave. AI isn't just a new tool. It
00:21:59
encompasses so much more. It's spurring a revolution across all industries and
00:22:03
reshaping itself to become a big part of our future together. Coreweave is at the
00:22:07
center, powering some of the biggest names in AI. As the essential cloud for AI, Corewave provides an AI platform
00:22:13
that combines next generation infrastructure, intelligent tools, and expert support. It's powering the
00:22:18
world's most complex AI workloads faster and more efficiently. From medical research and diagnosis to education,
00:22:23
from complex visual effects from movies to breakthroughs in science and technology. If it's AI, Cororeweave is
00:22:29
uniquely ready to power it with purpose-built tech. The big ideas, the wild visions and what-ifs and why nots.
00:22:35
Cororeeve is working to build what's never been built before. Cororeweave is
00:22:39
the essential cloud for AI. Ready for anything, ready for AI. To learn more about how Coree powers the world's best
00:22:44
AI, go to corweave.com/refor. Scott, we're back with more news. A landmark social media trial got underway
00:22:57
this week with Meta and YouTube accused of deliberately designing their platforms to addict young users. You
00:23:02
think the lawsuit is the first of more than500 similar cases to go to trial. This is something that's been building
00:23:07
for a long time. The plaintiff's lawyer is arguing that his client, a 20-year-old woman, got hooked on these
00:23:12
apps as a kid because they were like digital casinos delivering dopamine hits. Instagram head Adam Msari uh
00:23:18
testified on Wednesday that he doesn't think users can be quote clinically addicted to the app. Adam Msari is not a
00:23:24
doctor, just so you know. I can't believe he said that. It was kind of a a mistake on his part. Meanwhile, and also
00:23:30
he's wrong. Meanwhile, YouTube is arguing it's not social media, it's an
00:23:34
entertainment platform like Netflix and it's not addictive. That is also not
00:23:38
true. The jury, anyone who has kids knows that. Uh it's very different from Netflix. The jury trial, I mean, it's
00:23:44
become more like Netflix recently, but it's also an addictive situation. The
00:23:48
jury trial is expected to last six to eight weeks with Mark Zuckerberg and YouTube's Neil Mo expected to testify.
00:23:54
This is a really important trial. The big names are coming out and talking about an issue you and I have talked
00:23:59
about for years. Um, what what are the actual effects and who is responsible for creating an addictive product? And
00:24:07
I'm sorry, Adam. I'm not a doctor either, but any fool will tell you it's
00:24:11
anyone, not fool, any person will tell you it's addictive. Anyone who uses it.
00:24:15
Um, and you design and there's so much proof that you've designed it like a
00:24:19
casino or a cigarette or whatever it happens to be. Thoughts? >> Well, imagine you're 14 and someone you
00:24:26
go into your room and if you were like me, your mom wasn't home until 6:00 or 7
00:24:30
p.m. and you're home alone. >> Gilligans Island >> and yeah, that's it was Bugs Bunny and
00:24:34
Gilligans Island and I Dream of Genie for me. But what if in the corner there was a casino? What if there was an
00:24:41
arcade? What if there was? What if there was unlimited music? What if there And then you say, "No, no, no.
00:24:50
Study. What if there was the high school cafeteria where I could say something mean about someone else or someone could
00:24:57
say something mean about me and all I could think about the rest of the day and night was what they were saying
00:25:00
about me?" That the high school cafeteria never never left. And it ends up that about 6% of teenagers are
00:25:08
clinically addicted or or meet the clinical definition of addicted to either drugs or alcohol. But under that
00:25:15
same those same standards, 24% are addicted to social media. And just some data, the average American team teen
00:25:22
spends 4.8 hours a day using social media. 16% of teens or one in six use Tik Tok almost constantly. 15% for
00:25:30
YouTube, 13% for Snap, 12% for Instagram. And roughly half of all teens report feeling addicted to social media.
00:25:38
And you say, well, okay, fine. What's the impact? Teens who are in the highest
00:25:43
use group expressed two times more suicidal intent or self harm than those in the lowest use group. And the highest
00:25:50
use group also express poor uh body image at three times more than the lowest use group. And it typically takes
00:25:58
a society or it takes America 20 to 30 years to respond to really negative externalities. Took us 30 years with
00:26:06
tobacco. It took us 20 years with opiates. And if you think about social going on mobile in 2012, it 20 years is
00:26:14
probably the right number. I think when I'm I mean parents always ask me what
00:26:17
should I do with my kids and I say how old are your kids? And if they say three or five, I'm like, we'll have it figured
00:26:21
out by then because the data here is so overwhelming and we're up against uh
00:26:28
intrigence and people trying to delay an opuscate similar to those tobacco executives and they have more money and
00:26:33
they're more skilled this time. But eventually the tide, the tsunami of parental concern here, you know,
00:26:41
understandable parental concern is washing over all this [ __ ] where so I think in I would say I mean you have
00:26:48
entire countries now age gating. Look at what Australia is doing. I think another
00:26:53
two to three years I'm hopeful the landscape's going to be much different
00:26:57
for children. The the remedies would be warning sign there's lots of remedies
00:27:01
like with cigarettes peopleating age gating warning signals um they check ages legal liability the age checking is
00:27:10
harder >> what every what every other substance company and manufacturers media company
00:27:15
is subject to >> they've got to be kidding you know there's so much you they have so many
00:27:20
emails of them talking about this that's the problem for Adam is sorry to say
00:27:24
this he doesn't think it's clinically addictive come on Adam, come on. We all
00:27:28
think it is. We The problem is every adult knows this in their bones, right? It's like
00:27:33
>> cuz we're addicted. >> We're addicted. Like, we are. It's a
00:27:36
problem. You cannot put it down. And it is different from television. It is very
00:27:40
different. And television. Listen, Gilligans Island's addictive enough. I can't believe I watched all that [ __ ]
00:27:45
But you can walk away from it in a way. You cannot walk away from this. It's I
00:27:50
find myself I'm I have to throw the phone across the room, right? Sometimes I'm like, "Put it down." Um, you know,
00:27:57
every Amanda, same thing. We just It's really interesting. And sometimes I think about it. I'm like, I like news
00:28:03
and I'm read I'm mostly reading news, but I don't stop. That's the difference.
00:28:07
I put down magazines. I put down newspapers. And I love news. So, this is the all this stuff as it gets out, as
00:28:14
you see the emails in inside the company talking about it. And especially early on, they knew just what they were doing.
00:28:21
And um perhaps they weren't meaning to be malevolent at the beginning, but it's
00:28:26
malevolent for many young people and the impact is huge. And then they just keep
00:28:30
doubling down with AI relationships and synthetic relationships and everything else. This is the time has come round at
00:28:37
last for these companies. We'll see how well how how this trial does, but it's
00:28:41
going to it's going to just uncover more and more about what they knew. very much
00:28:45
like the cigarette companies. >> When you have hundreds of billions of dollars in shareholder value, trillions
00:28:50
of dollars of shareholder value, hundred billions in revenue, millions of some of
00:28:53
the brightest people in the world, and trillions of data points, all trying, all aiming towards one thing. How do we
00:28:58
get people to spend one more second every day on social and less time somewhere else, whether it's sports,
00:29:08
friends, studying, sleep, and they're winning. And young people, especially young men, who have this tremendous fall
00:29:13
in their brains where they're constantly dopah hungry, they're up against an
00:29:17
indomitable foe. And then the other >> like sugar. It's like sugar. It's the
00:29:22
same thing. It's the same. >> And then there's two or three. But your
00:29:25
kid your kid can take, you know, a 10 pound bag of sugar into his bedroom with him.
00:29:30
>> The the the other kid my kid could, but go ahead. >> The other two things it is a cumulative
00:29:36
effect that I think have really hurt our youth are one. I do think parents have some culpability here and that is we
00:29:44
have decided that our job is to clear out all borders and obstacles for our kids. We engage in concierge and
00:29:49
bulldozer parenting and by the time the kid gets to college he or she has never had a sea or a disappointment
00:29:55
>> and we've created this princess and pee um generation with good intentions. We
00:30:00
thought we were doing our kids a good thing. And then something that doesn't
00:30:03
get talked a lot about but I absolutely think is adding up to a generation that is at a disadvantage and that is if you
00:30:11
are 21 since the age of 10 the person you are supposed to look up to most in the world is Donald Trump. So
00:30:21
performative verality, coarseness and cruelty, >> online scams, >> crypto, doubling down on lies. This has
00:30:31
been the role model >> as kids brains are being wired during puberty. And no matter who is president
00:30:38
or what you think of the office, >> president is the person that millions of
00:30:44
young Americans look to as the as the ultimate of success in American values. So what have we done? We've raised a
00:30:51
generation of kids who are dopah hungry and their primary role model maybe with a close second the richest man in the
00:30:58
world >> the greatest control of all time >> are exhibiting values that are very
00:31:04
>> I mean and what do you know these 21 year olds are not it's shocking it's
00:31:09
shocking what good people they are what they have to deal with >> I would agree I think they do resist
00:31:14
more than you think and actually there are a lot of parents one of the things I spent a lot of time doing with my kids
00:31:19
whenever like can Can you go get this from me? Can you talk to that person if they wanted something? I'm like, you
00:31:23
need to do it. Like you I you figure it out has became one of my lines with my kids, my older kids. You figure it out.
00:31:31
I do it with my younger kids now. With Saul, I'm like, you figure it out. I don't know. I know, but you can do it
00:31:36
yourself. And so that's it's the best piece of advice you can give to like a
00:31:40
kid. You >> I've started giving my kid pounds when he gets good grades. Is that wrong?
00:31:45
>> I slip him I slip him a 20 pound. And I slip him a note when he gets an A on a
00:31:49
test. >> Do not do that. Well, >> totally. >> No. No. >> Anyway, um
00:31:54
>> that's called that's called capitalism. >> Okay. >> You got to get a bunch of money.
00:31:58
>> Okay. All right. Whatever. Whatever you want to do there, Scott. We should write
00:32:01
competing parenting books. Uh in the same genre about surveillance, as you know, that's another thing I go crazy
00:32:06
about. Um investigators in the Nancy Guthrie abduction case have recovered footage from the Nest doorbell. Nest is
00:32:12
owned by Google. It was initially thought to have no video because there was no active subscription. When you
00:32:16
sign up, you have, for people who don't know, for Nest or any of these things,
00:32:20
you can buy a subscription. If you don't, they say they don't keep the video. As it turns out, they do. The
00:32:26
incident shows that Nest uploads video to Google Cloud before you decide to keep it with a paid plan so it can
00:32:31
linger after it says it's been deleted, is supposed to be deleted. I'm glad they
00:32:37
got these pictures of this guy. At the same time, this is an edge case. They're
00:32:41
they're keeping your video that which I which everyone thought they were doing
00:32:45
and they said they weren't. The FBI working with Google engineers took 10 days to recover the footage from
00:32:49
Guthri's camera. I the companies need to spell out in plain English how long
00:32:55
deleted footage actually remains on their servers. And by the way, they're also getting incredible push back from
00:33:00
the Ring ad for the Super Bowl, which is like, "We're watching everybody, but
00:33:04
only for your dogs." And there's been a million memes about only for people we
00:33:08
need to take away. like the surveillance of these kind of things and the ease of
00:33:14
which they are hacked by the way not just taken off the door like this terrible person did um but hacked into
00:33:21
are quite something a lot of people are getting them hardwired into their house so that they can't do that and also so
00:33:27
that they can't be um taken via wireless there's a lot of wireless activity here
00:33:32
but there are ways to a lot of these things are open season on your home I don't when I Just speaking of my son, my
00:33:40
kids, Alex took I had one of them up at one of our houses when we bought it. It was there, one of these Amazon or Echo
00:33:47
or whatever. He took them all out. He took one day I came back and everything was gone. And I was like, "Why?" And he
00:33:53
goes, "Because they can watch us." And I was like, "Don't be paranoid." He goes,
00:33:56
"I'm not." And he was right. So >> I think we're I think we have a bit of a
00:34:01
different view on this in the sense that I think technology I think we gave up our privacy a long time ago. Yes, Scott
00:34:07
McNeely, we did >> what I want to see. Oh, remember Scott? >> Yeah, he said that
00:34:12
>> privacy doesn't exist. Get used to it. Remember, >> if you are in London or New York, you
00:34:17
can't go more than I think it's 30 feet agree >> outside without a camera.
00:34:21
>> And the reason they did that was they implemented massive they have like a a
00:34:25
security headquarters because of 911. And I actually what I think you need though is really really wellthoughtout
00:34:34
laws and institutions that say we're not going to go fishing unless it's a felony
00:34:41
crime. We don't investigate it. >> In other words, people have the right
00:34:45
You said something I've thought about a lot and that is people have the right to
00:34:48
have secrets. >> Yeah. >> And if you want to if you want to go into a store, if you're I don't know,
00:34:55
you you should be able to do what you want. If you murder somebody then quite frankly and there are enough there's
00:35:03
enough evidence to say that you are a reasonable person of interest then we are going to utilize uh cameras data
00:35:14
video footage >> I agree with you I just think you buy this product and it says it isn't
00:35:18
keeping it if you don't pay for it then it's not keeping it like I'm sorry
00:35:22
that's just the deal that's just the deal when you buy I have several of
00:35:25
these and I've taken most of them off my house, but they say ex and I pay a lot
00:35:30
of attention. We if you don't pay this stuff is deleted. This is deleted. If it
00:35:36
says it's deleted, it should be deleted. That's all. It's just the deal you make
00:35:40
with them. And so I don't think they should keep it if it's supposed to be
00:35:43
deleted. Same thing with Echo. It shouldn't be listening if it says it's
00:35:47
not listening. Right. That's what that's if you want it to listen, you can tell
00:35:51
it. That's in your home. I'm talking about this outside. I think we've lost
00:35:55
that battle. They're going to their cameras are everywhere in talk about London. Monte Carlo is really wired. So
00:36:00
is the United States of America. And that's a good thing when it comes to crime, but it's a very bad thing when it
00:36:06
comes inside of your house. Cuz Scott, I know if you want to wear your frilly underwear, I think I Oh, wait. Was that
00:36:12
a secret? Um, I back people in their homes. I'm just >> Daddy goes commando. Big and the twins
00:36:19
want to be free. But I I think it's it's in this case it was good to be able to
00:36:24
get the picture of this guy. At the same time, she didn't the intent wasn't to.
00:36:30
So if plain English of what you're doing and how long it remains and then it
00:36:34
should tell you when it's deleted and permanently deleted. If they say permanently deleted, it needs to be
00:36:40
deleted. That's I I feel like that's >> at some point you should be able to
00:36:44
have, you know, I have cameras around my house. You can see almost everything. I try to sneak in all the time
00:36:48
>> if someone were to break in. But I think what you want is like this is the hack that I think is coming.
00:36:58
Somebody hacks into Uber with your Uber. If you use Uber a lot, I think you can find out when someone is with a thin
00:37:05
layer of AI on top of your Uber trips where >> they go. >> Mhm. >> They'll be able to know if you just
00:37:09
terminated a pregnancy. >> Yep. >> Or if you're a Russian spy. Why is this
00:37:13
person continually going to the Russian embassy? Why is this are you having affairs with sameex?
00:37:19
A thin layer of AI on top of your ride history when and where you are going places.
00:37:26
>> It would be they would it would be very easy to say, okay, this person is
00:37:31
clearly suffering from diabetes. This is why they keep going to this >> type of clinic. You could. This person
00:37:39
is clearly engaged in a love affair with this dude at this address. This person is clearly
00:37:49
>> sure is constantly going to Amtrak. But go ahead. >> This person is clearly cooperating with
00:37:53
the CIA as evidenced by the fact they keep going to this one address that is a co. They could find out. So that hack,
00:38:04
folks, this is this is the trade we all make and we all talk a big game. Anyone who talks about privacy is typically
00:38:11
over the age of 50 and in Brussels or DC. We consistently trade our privacy for utility.
00:38:18
>> Yep, we do. >> And and what I want is massively Okay. Unless it's a felony, maybe even
00:38:26
more than that, it's a felony that with that has a threat of violence and there's really strong evidence against
00:38:33
one person, all that [ __ ] is off limits. No one can use it. >> All I'm saying is if they say it's off,
00:38:39
it needs to be off like >> or at least give you the power to delete it. >> It's like if you buy like I don't know,
00:38:45
organic apple, it's not organic. You can't do that. I mean, >> it's the same thing. You're selling a
00:38:50
product, you say what it is, stay with what you say it is. But at the same time, I love the fact, okay, when when
00:38:56
there's a crime, >> crime is hitting despite all the scariness and everyone saying whether
00:39:00
it's whether they saying saying it's, you know, Eric Adams or mom Donnie or
00:39:04
it's it's bedum in the streets, >> crime, the number of shootings in New
00:39:08
York last year, I think, hit like an all-time low. >> Violence is going and crime, violent
00:39:13
crime has consistently gone down the last several decades. It was, is it because we're a better people? I don't
00:39:19
think so. is because if you commit crimes now, everyone has seen those Law and Order SUVs
00:39:25
>> that if you if you go into a 7-Eleven in the middle of [ __ ] nowhere >> and shoot the clerk,
00:39:32
>> they're film >> ATMs have cameras. So, was there any ATMs outside? Then they check the
00:39:37
footage on the ATM. I like I don't like a surveillance state. I like a state I
00:39:42
like a place where if a really strong lawyers that where they consistently say, "I get you think a crime is
00:39:49
committed here. There's not enough evidence. You do not have access to this video.
00:39:53
>> Right. >> Stop. There's evidence that you're planning a terrorist attack. Sorry,
00:39:58
boss. We're violating your privacy rights. Every ring light, but we have Uber. We still I still think we have a
00:40:05
dupe process. We can't have the wrong people getting a hold of stuff. Anyway,
00:40:09
I I hope they find Nancy Guthrie and I hope it helps that they have these, but we have to be it brings up a big issue
00:40:17
about surveillance and we should pay attention to it. Um, and I hope it helps find find her and bring her home safely
00:40:24
to her family. Um, anyway, let's go on a quick break. We come back, uh, we'll
00:40:29
talk about the latest in AI news. There's a lot of it. Support for the show comes from Indeed.
00:40:35
Hiring isn't just about finding someone willing to take the job. It's about
00:40:38
connecting with someone who can move your business forward. For that, check out Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Indeed
00:40:44
sponsored jobs boosts your job post for quality candidates so you can reach people that can help your business
00:40:49
thrive. People are finding quality hires on Indeed right now as we speak. In the
00:40:53
minute I've been talking to you, 27 hires were made on Indeed, according to Indeed data worldwide. Join the 3.3
00:40:59
million employers worldwide that use Indeed to connect with quality talent that fits their needs. Spend less time
00:41:04
searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more
00:41:09
results now with Indeed sponsored jobs. And listeners to this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help get
00:41:16
your job the premium status it deserves at indeed.com/pivot. Just go to indeed.com/pivot
00:41:22
right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast,
00:41:26
indeed.com/pivot. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring, do the right way with Indeed.
00:41:36
Support for this show comes from Quint. Style doesn't come from chasing new trends every season. Real style comes
00:41:43
from slowly and intentionally cultivating a wardrobe filled with highquality staples that will last. And
00:41:47
if you're on the lookout for a perfect addition to your closet, look no further
00:41:50
than Quint. You'll find organic cotton sweaters, polos for every occasion, light jackets that will help keep you
00:41:55
warm as the seasons change year after year. Not to mention their famous 100% Mongolian cashmere. If there's anything
00:42:01
better than Kashmir, I'd love to hear it. Every Quint's item is built for
00:42:05
everyday wear and made with ethically sourced materials from top factories. And by partnering with manufacturers
00:42:10
directly, Quint keeps things affordable. So, you're only paying for the quality
00:42:14
clothing and not the brand markup. I have finally bought new Quint clothes, not just uh soft pants that I can wear
00:42:20
when I do sports. I actually bought more of those, but I also bought a lovely cardigan that is so soft. I wear it all
00:42:25
the time. I fell asleep in it the other day. I bought a beautiful jacket and I just love it. I have to say this this
00:42:31
cardigan I'm wearing is so comfortable. It's really good-looking. The fabric,
00:42:35
everything else, it feels richer than it was. Um, and the same thing with the coat. It's really good-looking and I
00:42:40
really like wearing it. Again, comfortable, simple, uh, and just lovely. I really, really like it.
00:42:47
Refresh your wardrobe with Quint. Don't wait. Go to quint.com/pivot for free shipping on your orders and
00:42:53
365day returns. Now available in Canada, too. That's quinc.com/pivotpivot t to get free shipping and 365day
00:43:03
returns. quint.com/pivot. Scott, we're back with more news. Time for rapid fire of AI news. First up,
00:43:12
Anthropic is in the final stages of raising $20 billion in new capital at a valuation of $350 billion
00:43:19
uh valuation. And also at Anthropic, a researcher submitted a resignation letter saying the world is in peril,
00:43:25
saying employees constantly face pressures to set aside what matters most. That researcher is going off to
00:43:31
write poetry, by the way, which should trouble you. Over at XAI, Elon Musk has lost two co-founders, Jimmy Ba and Tony
00:43:38
Woo. Both announced their departure is a big restructuring over there too when he
00:43:42
as he's brought it into uh SpaceX. The company at OpenAI, the company's fired
00:43:47
an executive after she opposed plans for an AI erotica feature in chat GBT citing
00:43:52
sexual discrimination. We don't actually know what happened here. Uh Anthropic
00:43:56
raised the funding uh raised twice the funding initially sought based on investor demand. Uh so thoughts on any
00:44:03
of these stories? Lots of different lots of stuff happening around AI again. >> Yeah, the why people get fired or why
00:44:10
they say they were fired? I don't know. I haven't sorted through that. What I I
00:44:13
think is already happened whether it's reflected in the valuations or not. I
00:44:18
think Anthropic is now worth more than open AAI. I think open AAI >> what was their valuation? 800 billion.
00:44:24
>> Well, they're I think they're trying to close around at 850. >> Yeah. 850.
00:44:27
>> But that one VC who kind of if there was a moment where the the the balloon was
00:44:34
burst, if you will, the bubble was burst. It was when that VC had Sam Alman on his podcast and said, "You've made a
00:44:40
trillion dollars in spending commitments on a company with 20 billion in revenue.
00:44:43
How are you going to do that?" And he got very defensive about it. And they've
00:44:47
gone consumer anthropics gone enterprise. Uh they haven't made the kind of crazy commitments. I I think
00:44:56
there's been the kind of the mother of all industrial pivots. I think now, if
00:45:01
you will, Avis is now hurts. I think Anthropic is now worth more or will be soon than Open AI.
00:45:07
>> They are not making the money. >> Yeah, that's but they're they're
00:45:12
stronger in the enterprise. Anyways, I none of this makes any sense in terms of a multiple on revenues, but uh I think I
00:45:19
think Open AI is in real um I don't know, crisis is the wrong word. There's a lot of arguments over on
00:45:28
X about that they have now do not have he his big thing was I have the best AI researchers now he does not right from
00:45:35
what most people intelligent people are saying about it but you know he always does this he always goes in and shakes
00:45:42
the tree and then shakes the tree again that's that's his emmo I guess they're a
00:45:47
distant what third or fourth something >> well these guys are all here's an a
00:45:53
symbol of how easy it is and how difficult or how vulnerable they are. It says, "Here are some Daario and Daniela
00:46:00
Emodi. Uh, we're at OpenAI now at anthropic." Ilia Sitsker, open AAI, now at safe
00:46:08
super intelligence. Aravan Shinavas, Open AI, now at Perplexity. Mera Morati, open AAI now at thinking machines.
00:46:15
Arthur Mench was at Google, now at Mstral AI. It's the brightest minds here are supposedly in I used to work with a
00:46:24
lot of luxury brands and they said the biggest problem they were having in China
00:46:27
>> Mhm. is that at the biggest malls, if Prada was had a store across the street
00:46:31
from Bautega Vanetta, >> if if the manager of that Prada didn't have people show up, he could go across
00:46:38
the street during the lunch hour to the lunch court and offer someone 11 bucks an hour from the Bautga store who was
00:46:45
making 10 and they wouldn't even go back after their lunch break. They would go
00:46:49
over and work out. It was just so easy to pick off people by offering them a dollar more per hour. And it feels so
00:46:55
many of these deep these people who have, you know, fairly or unfairly have established themselves as some of the
00:47:03
few minds that really understand this stuff. The amount of money and temptation to go do their own thing or
00:47:09
join another firm. It is I mean supposedly wasn't there reports that Zuckerberg was paying some people$100 or
00:47:17
$300 million and then he wasn't. >> I mean it just feels like it's total I
00:47:22
don't know bedum right now. Right. It's it's they all think they're going to be
00:47:26
the one, right? I'm going to be the final one standing and I'm going to own
00:47:29
the world essentially, which is a bet. It's a bet, right? I think one of the
00:47:34
things that continues to plague these companies are these researchers who are like, we're [ __ ] everybody. Like they
00:47:40
come out and almost, you know, like they're sort of like, sh it's going to
00:47:45
kill us, >> I think. But quite frankly, K, I think a lot of it is people backfilling
00:47:53
uh the reason why they're living with leaving with morality sometimes or some
00:47:57
sort of victimhood. If you look at just to go back to musical chairs here, if you look at XAI, the company lost its
00:48:04
second co-founder in just two days. And that means that half of XAI's founding
00:48:09
team, six of the 12 have left the company in less than three years of existence. and Mus said, you know, we we
00:48:16
reorganized XAI to improve the speed of execution, which required parting some ways with some people. And I think for
00:48:23
some of these founders, there's legal risk to staying at XAI. The EU is currently investigating the company for
00:48:29
its creation of non-consensual sexual deep fakes based on real people, including children. So, this really is
00:48:36
the wild west. This is um you know, I don't know. I I think it's just it's so
00:48:43
difficult to even keep track of >> Yeah. Yeah. >> You know, who ends up where and why.
00:48:48
>> It's like as if a science people went crazy, right? But I I do think the
00:48:53
warnings are getting really interesting. They're like I wish someone would just
00:48:56
explain what we're in peril. How how are we in >> Yeah. How does that manifest? What does
00:49:01
that mean? Hey. Hey. Like, oh, it's like the people who knew that we were about,
00:49:06
you know, in those movies where a bunch of people know we're about to get hit by
00:49:09
a like a comet or something and they're not telling us. They're like, I would
00:49:15
>> love your family. Why >> is it Arnold Schwarzenegger showing up at your door wearing Oakleys and a lot
00:49:21
of leather? Like, what is it? >> What is happening? >> What does it look like here? What does
00:49:24
it What does it mean? Cuz the employment destruction that was supposed to be already well underway, I would argue is
00:49:29
not happening yet. I don't know. But why would someone say they're in peril?
00:49:33
We're in peril and set aside what matters most, which is safety presumably. And then they go off and
00:49:38
write poetry. I would like some more information if you don't mind. If you're
00:49:42
going to do that, you need to tell me. >> Yeah. Why exactly why are we in peril?
00:49:46
>> Why are we in peril? But >> from what? Tell me. Tell us. I know. I
00:49:51
know there's these legal things, but if it's so terrifying, you need to like
00:49:55
step out and like tell us tell us what it is and have bring proof, too. by the way, would love to know when the comet's
00:50:02
going to hit us. In any case, uh >> but the VP of product policy at OpenAI
00:50:06
was fired after she voiced opposition to Open AI's upcoming erotica features for
00:50:11
adult users. >> Yeah, >> she she did something else >> that enabling erotica would likely
00:50:17
strengthen feelings that users already have for the chatbot. Based on a recent report released by OpenAI, out of chat
00:50:23
GBD's 800 million weekly users, >> 1.2 And 2 million users are prioritizing
00:50:29
talking to chat GBT over their family, friends, school, or work. That's less
00:50:32
than I would have thought. Roughly 560K are experiencing psychosis or mania. This is shitty research. As a as a as a
00:50:41
ratio by 800 million people, is that normal or not normal? >> That's a lot.
00:50:44
>> And about 1.2 million people discuss suicide with chat GPT. Again, what I
00:50:49
want to see is someone to say, >> "All right, is that just a function of
00:50:52
people who are depressed thinking they can talk to chat GPT just as they would talk to a friend or a therapist, right?
00:50:57
>> Or is it something about talking to chat GPT?" >> Right? You get the psychosis,
00:51:01
>> suicidal ideiation or psychosis. >> Ladder, you know, interesting. I just
00:51:05
did an interview with Sher Challe from my doc series and she's been saying it
00:51:08
for years and she's like, I've never seen anything like it now. It was before
00:51:12
on the sidelines and in the darker places or people had, you know, it was a small group of people. She goes, "It's
00:51:18
really gone mainstream in a way. I I would like the information from these people. Would you come out and bring a
00:51:23
bag and bring it to me or Scott or something like that?" >> Anyway, Carisher, on a separate note, speaking
00:51:31
of sort of normal journalism and getting information out, one of the most depressing things, Hong Kong media mogul
00:51:37
and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lie was sentenced this week to 20 years in prison after he found guilty in a
00:51:42
sedition and collusion with foreign forces. It's the longest sentence ever handed down under a death sentence.
00:51:48
>> Death sentence. Uh Eli's children are saying a potential visit by President
00:51:51
Trump April could be crucial in securing the release of their 78-year-old father.
00:51:55
This is something Trump should do. Back in December, Trump said he asked uh President Xi to consider releasing lie.
00:52:01
But on the campaign trail in 2024, he was a lot more confident saying 100% I'll get him out. He'll be easy to get
00:52:06
out. He's not so easy to get out. Let's not forget the real surveillance
00:52:11
economy, the real control economy. We've talked about these issues around control
00:52:15
and the uses of AI for badness. Um, China wins the boats everywhere and they they go after this guy who's a really
00:52:24
important uh figure um uh figure in in this area. And so if President Trump can do anything, please do it. If anyone can
00:52:34
do anything, but Jimmy Li is a hero and and what's happened to him is is as you
00:52:39
say a death sentence. >> Look, I go to the economics. when you start imprisoning journalists, whether
00:52:44
it was Turkey in 2012, Soviet Union at the turn of the century or China, uh, putting the, you know, taking a very
00:52:53
hardfed approach to Hong Kong in 2021 as kind of best epitomized by Timi being imprisoned,
00:53:00
distinct of the morality of it, distinct of the importance it plays in a society,
00:53:05
the nation gets poorer and angrier. It's a it is literally a conard a canary in
00:53:09
the coal mine saying we are about to send a chill across some of the most talented people and scrutiny about what
00:53:15
can be said about companies that hurts the economy. The nations get poorer and angrier and it's literally a symbol of
00:53:24
when an economy is about to move to an authoritarian state which is really bad for innovation for attracting outside
00:53:30
capital. When you're thinking about investing in Turkey, and all of a sudden they
00:53:36
start locking up journalists. Does that thing does that does that if you're Google, you think, "Yeah, I'm going to
00:53:41
start I'm going to open an office in I'm going to open an office in Istanbul."
00:53:46
You think, you know, I'm going to wait and see if they sort that out. If you're
00:53:49
one of the brightest PhDs in the world and you're doing research on authoritarian governments or you're
00:53:56
doing research on innovation and you're worried that your research might might
00:54:01
contradict something that the leadership is espousing to do you go teach at those
00:54:05
universities? No, you go somewhere else. So this is look China is not you know is
00:54:13
not a model for but having said that I was just supposed to be on with Don Lemon who got
00:54:19
arrested. Why the [ __ ] why are they arresting Don Lemon? >> Don Lemon like give me a break. They
00:54:24
shouldn't be arresting any journalist like this. It's just ridiculous. I would
00:54:28
agree. Um I'm going to finish up with any Jimmy L. Let's get him out. Let's
00:54:32
let's get him out. He's a hero. Um I'm going to finish up with something that
00:54:35
just happened. Um Gail Slater, who a hugely respected lawyer, antitrust lawyer who was running antitrust of DOJ,
00:54:42
just announced she's stepping down. It follows uh the the resignation of a guy
00:54:46
named Mark Hammer, who was one of his her top deputies. She's had clashes with
00:54:51
Pam Bondi over the Hanley antitrust investigations. I have heard she was in a real bind over the Paramount thing.
00:54:58
They're trying to like shove through things that are friendly to the Trump administration and she just can't do it.
00:55:04
She can't do it. that during her 11 months on the job, she found herself in this bind caught between the Trump
00:55:09
administration's um she was close to JD Vance. This is a very respected and well- reggarded
00:55:16
antitrust version. This should be an enormous signal that Gail Slater is stepping down. Um I had hoped to talk to
00:55:22
her, but everyone had told me they didn't know what she was going to do about the the Netflix Paramount thing.
00:55:28
Um you cannot be against the Netflix thing if you're not against the Paramount thing. I'm sorry. like and of
00:55:34
course she's being, you know, she she had a she's been put in a bind all over
00:55:38
the place. A talented and and well regarded person has put into a bind and so she's stepping down. Um I just don't
00:55:45
know who they'll put in some idiot like a Brandon Carr type of person who will
00:55:49
just do what they say. Um but it really brings it down rather significantly. Even even um Megan Del Reinver works for
00:55:56
Paramount actually now very well regarded like they're going to have to put in it in a village [ __ ] idiot in
00:56:02
the Pam Bondi mode. So not a good sign. Not a good sign. >> Yeah, great. >> Anyway, uh one more quick break. We'll
00:56:08
be back for predictions. >> Support for the show comes from Netswuite. We all hear all the time how
00:56:14
AI can push businesses to new frontiers. If you're still not sure what that actually looks like, particularly for
00:56:19
you and your company, then look no further than Netswuite by Oracle. Netswuite is a top AI cloud ERP trusted
00:56:26
by over 43,000 businesses. It's a unified suite that brings your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and
00:56:31
CRM into a single source of truth. With all that connected data, your AI doesn't
00:56:35
throw out its best guess. It actually knows what it's talking about. It can intelligently automate routine tasks,
00:56:40
deliver actionable insights, and help make fast AI powered decisions with confidence. Now with Netswuite AI
00:56:46
connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect to your actual business data. Plus, you can automate
00:56:51
those tiresome manual processes. It's AI built into the system that runs your
00:56:55
business, affording you total flexibility. Get ahead of the game and put AI to work today with Netswuite. If
00:57:02
your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get the free business guide, Demystifying AI, at netsweet.com/pivot.
00:57:09
The guide is free to you at netsweet.com/pivot. netsweet.com/pivot. >> Okay, Scott, let's hear a prediction.
00:57:18
>> I think that what was supposed to be the most anticipated IPO, maybe with the expect
00:57:24
exception of kind of Space X, AI, Tesla, the >> whatever Tesla's not in there yet.
00:57:30
>> Probably the most anticipated was Open the IPO of Open AI in 2026, sometime
00:57:36
this year, early 27. I don't think that's going to happen. Um I think that
00:57:42
yeah I think this company is is now is gone into full um I don't call it panic mode but it
00:57:50
feels as if the m momentum has a habit of creating more momentum and I think the momentum is really negative around
00:57:56
this company >> what happens where does it go what does it do >> well I think they'll substantially
00:58:03
um scale back there I mean have you already seen the war have you already seen Jensen Hang and Sam Alman who were
00:58:09
you Bud buddies are already [ __ ] posting each other, >> right? >> Claiming that the hundred billion dollar
00:58:14
agreement with was a framework and they're actually not the hundred billion investment.
00:58:18
>> May I just say you said that >> well that was ridiculous. These circular
00:58:23
deals I'll give you a hundred billion. I'll invest 100 billion if you invest
00:58:26
100 billion in our chips. And now and now quote unquote Jensen's backtracking
00:58:30
and saying well it was just a framework they couldn't justify it. Nvidia stock
00:58:35
has gone down because people are worried about exposure to open AI. Right. So what does OpenAI do? They start ship
00:58:40
posting Nvidia and saying no was because their chips didn't live up to our expectations. When when the biggest
00:58:47
player in the space Jensen Hong and kind of the young gun Open AI start ship posting each other and and they back out
00:58:55
of this hundred billion dollar investment framework. That is a really bad sign. >> He kept using what was the word? We're
00:59:02
honored to be invited. What was he saying? It was so funny. Yeah, but they're both going on background now and
00:59:07
blaming each other. >> Oh, totally. Utterly. Like, can I just give people a lesson? When you hear
00:59:12
sources close to the situation, if they were any closer to either of them, they'd be on the other side of them.
00:59:17
>> That's them, right? The >> So, I think I think the momentum the the
00:59:23
worm has turned. And it's not that OpenAI isn't an unbelievable company that could go public at like a $50
00:59:28
billion market capitalization. But the problem is when you sell some investors in at 250, 450, and then if he's able to
00:59:34
close this round at 850, they're not willing to go public or let you have a liquidity event that cuts there. What
00:59:41
happens in an IPO? Say he went public at 300 billion next year and said, "Okay,
00:59:45
the market isn't what we thought." Unless there's a couple years where the
00:59:49
latest round of investors get so fatigued they're willing to take a 60% haircut. All of your shares, the last
00:59:55
round of investment has a preference, meaning they they're the first money out. So the 50 or 100 billion going in
01:00:01
at 850 doesn't want to give up their liquidity preference and let them go public if they're going public at less
01:00:07
than 850, which I think they would. So your last round of investors become a veto block for going public unless
01:00:14
you're going to go public at a valuation greater than 850. >> So what do they do? You haven't answered
01:00:19
my question. >> They'll dramatic, in my opinion, they'll dramatically scale back their capital,
01:00:24
their capex and they'll end up with a much smaller, much less ambitious amazing company that's only worth a
01:00:30
100red or 200 billion. It's only one of the 30 most valuable companies in America. Not the
01:00:35
>> get bought what? Well, that means everyone else will get collapsed, right?
01:00:38
Or not. I think the whole my opinion if you look at and I look at weird signals the percentage of ads at the Super Bowl
01:00:44
right if you look at all this I think there's a ton of anecdotal evidence showing that while AI may live up to its
01:00:51
potential the market cap of the biggest players this year is about to throw up which isn't to say that similar in 2000
01:00:59
when the market cap of Amazon went down 95% it's still not going to be an unbelievable company but I think we're
01:01:05
about to see a dramatic recalibration in the markets which includes Open AAI's
01:01:09
IPO plans getting queered. Now, who's going to take their place? And this is
01:01:13
the prediction. >> Mhm. >> The most impressive numbers hands down that no one I wasn't expecting.
01:01:20
>> Khi's year on year >> and not Poly Market, right? >> Well, Khi's Khi is actually of the two
01:01:29
the clean well-lit space of this I see. Okay. >> Of this marketplace, right? It's a
01:01:35
little Cali is CFTC regulated. It's also in the US. It's peer-to-peer trading.
01:01:41
It's federally regulated. Um I have some I don't have moral clarity around these
01:01:46
issues because I do think they tap into the dopa of a young more risk aggressive
01:01:50
male brain. But just let me go straight to the numbers here. >> In 2026 or in this Super Bowl, right,
01:01:58
>> over a billion dollar in trading volume on Cali. That's up 2,700%. It was up 28fold this year. And you know
01:02:08
who's getting absolutely the [ __ ] kicked out of them is Flutter is the gambling
01:02:13
sites. They're killing these guys. The sports market accounted for about 90% of Kow's
01:02:19
activity this month. And it's it's having an incredible impact on traditional gambling and sports book. Um
01:02:28
analysts have noted that Khu's ride ride rise coincides with the underperformance
01:02:32
in major sports books stock prices draft kings flutter as traders shift some activity towards prediction markets and
01:02:39
with a venue that's easy to access nationwide which koshi is even in states without legal sports betting the firm is
01:02:45
attracting betterers who might otherwise um have used traditional sports books. So this is this company and my my
01:02:53
prediction is the following. Open AI way to the downside doesn't get public. Khi is about is going to be in
01:03:01
my opinion the kind of IPO we're all trying to get into in Q2 of Q3 of this year.
01:03:07
>> Kchi it is. All right. Well, that's interesting. You've been sounding this
01:03:10
alarm for these companies. Interesting. Fascinating. That's a big one, Scott.
01:03:14
That's a big one. >> We'll see. Right. >> Yeah. Anyway, we want to hear from you.
01:03:19
Send us your questions about business, tech, or whatever's on your mind. Go to
01:03:21
nymag.com/pivot to submit a question for the show or call 85551 pivot. Uh elsewhere in the
01:03:28
Cara and Scott universe this week on Profy Markets, Scott spoke with Esar Prasad, professor of trade policy and
01:03:34
economics at Cornell University to discuss why he thinks economics, domestic politics, and geopolitics are
01:03:40
stuck in a doom loop. Doom loop. Let's listen to a clip. Globalization used to
01:03:46
be seen as a positive sum game where countries could benefit mutually from trade and that would be an offset to
01:03:53
what is intrinsically the zero sum game of geopolitics where one country can gain influence only at the expense of
01:04:00
another. But now even globalization has become seen as a zero sum game. So it isn't offsetting the zero sum game of
01:04:07
geopolitics and worse some of the negative dynamics of globalization have started infecting domestic politics not
01:04:14
just in the US but in many other countries. >> God I feel smarter already my people
01:04:19
>> you know there's professor um >> Prasad that one of the things that
01:04:26
struck me and I said this >> we graduated the same year from undergraduate me from UCLA him from the
01:04:32
University of Madras. >> Mhm. I graduated with a 2.27 GPA with an incredible ability to make bongs out of
01:04:39
any household item. >> He won a scholarship in India that identified like one of the 50 smartest
01:04:44
kids of a billion kids. >> And so what what do what does a guy who's one of the 50 like he this guy
01:04:52
could walk into the Rose Bowl and take the average IQ of those 80,000 people up a couple points. That's how smart and
01:04:58
hardworking this man is. So what are we doing to what are we saying to these people now? Can you imagine a kid coming
01:05:02
out of the University of Memphis right now in 2026? Is he going to go to Brown? >> Yeah.
01:05:07
>> No, he's going to go to Miguel or he's going to go to Instituta or he's going
01:05:11
to go to >> INSEAD >> or who knows maybe >> maybe the University of Cordova in
01:05:16
Argentina. I mean, >> speaking of doom loops, academic doom loops. >> We're the sports team that used to have
01:05:22
access to the number one draft at any college in the world and we've said no,
01:05:27
we don't want >> and now we just have Prof coming back to the Anyway, it's it sounds like a great
01:05:34
interview. I'll be listening to it. That is the show. Thanks for listening to
01:05:37
Pivot and be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. Uh we'll be back
01:05:41
next week.

Episode Highlights

  • The Power of Unsubscribing
    One social media post can lead to thousands of unsubscribes and significant market impact.
    “One Insta Post can inspire 6 to 7,000 unique site visits.”
    @ 00m 55s
    February 13, 2026
  • Impact of Subscription Choices
    Unsubscribing can have a massive economic impact, affecting market valuations significantly.
    “You can have a massive impact by unsubscribing right now.”
    @ 03m 14s
    February 13, 2026
  • Epstein Investigation Continues
    The fallout from the Epstein files is far from over, raising serious questions about accountability.
    “This Epstein thing isn’t going away, Pam.”
    @ 09m 59s
    February 13, 2026
  • Social Media Trial Begins
    A landmark trial against Meta and YouTube over addiction claims kicks off this week.
    “This is a really important trial.”
    @ 22m 57s
    February 13, 2026
  • The Impact of Social Media on Teens
    Data reveals alarming statistics about teen addiction and mental health issues related to social media use.
    “24% are addicted to social media.”
    @ 25m 15s
    February 13, 2026
  • The Illusion of Privacy
    Privacy is a myth in modern society, especially in major cities.
    “Privacy doesn't exist. Get used to it.”
    @ 34m 12s
    February 13, 2026
  • Surveillance and Crime Rates
    Despite fears, crime rates have been declining due to increased surveillance.
    “Violent crime has consistently gone down the last several decades.”
    @ 39m 16s
    February 13, 2026
  • AI's Troubling Trends
    Concerns arise as AI companies face internal turmoil and ethical dilemmas.
    “The world is in peril, saying employees constantly face pressures.”
    @ 43m 25s
    February 13, 2026
  • Trump's Potential Involvement
    Eli's children believe a visit from Trump could help secure their father's release.
    “This is something Trump should do.”
    @ 51m 55s
    February 13, 2026
  • The Stakes of Imprisoning Journalists
    Imprisoning journalists signals a shift towards authoritarianism, impacting the economy.
    “It's literally a symbol of when an economy is about to move to an authoritarian state.”
    @ 53m 24s
    February 13, 2026
  • Gail Slater Steps Down
    Gail Slater, a respected antitrust lawyer, resigns amid clashes with the Trump administration.
    “This should be an enormous signal that Gail Slater is stepping down.”
    @ 55m 20s
    February 13, 2026

Episode Quotes

  • You can have a massive impact by unsubscribing right now.
    Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot
  • It’s the cover-up that gets you.
    Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot
  • We’re addicted. Like, we are. It’s a problem.
    Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot
  • We consistently trade our privacy for utility.
    Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot
  • Why are we in peril?
    Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot
  • Let's get him out. He's a hero.
    Nancy Guthrie Disappearance Raises New Surveillance Questions | Pivot

Key Moments

  • Social Media Influence00:55
  • Economic Impact03:03
  • Epstein Fallout09:59
  • Cover-Up Consequences12:13
  • Trial Insights23:56
  • Teen Mental Health25:40
  • Trump's Confidence52:03
  • Gail Slater Resignation54:44

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown