Search Captions & Ask AI

Rahm Emanuel: “Nobody Believes Our President” on Iran | Pivot

April 10, 2026 / 01:04:56

This episode of Pivot covers topics such as Rahm Emanuel's political ambitions, the state of the Democratic Party, and recent developments in U.S. foreign policy. Guests include Rahm Emanuel, former mayor of Chicago and ambassador to Japan, who discusses his potential presidential run and the importance of education and community college initiatives.

Emanuel shares insights from his conversations with Americans about their needs, including healthcare and job opportunities. He emphasizes the need for the Democratic Party to focus on a positive agenda rather than simply opposing Donald Trump.

The episode also touches on the current political landscape, including election results in Georgia and Wisconsin, and the significance of independent voters in shaping future elections. Emanuel argues for a compelling narrative to unite voters and move the country forward.

Additionally, the conversation shifts to foreign policy, addressing the Iran war ceasefire and the challenges facing the current administration. Emanuel critiques the lack of clear objectives and accountability in U.S. foreign policy.

The episode concludes with a discussion on the importance of addressing corruption and the need for a proactive agenda in the Democratic Party to secure future victories.

TL;DR

Rahm Emanuel discusses his presidential ambitions, the Democratic Party's future, and challenges in U.S. foreign policy and elections.

Episode

1:04:56
00:00:00
I would like to say you have dropped the
00:00:02
fbomb three times on
00:00:04
>> I know. I know. I know. I know. You can
00:00:06
do it anytime.
00:00:06
>> I'm zero.
00:00:14
>> Hi everyone. This is Pivot from New York
00:00:16
Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast
00:00:17
Network. I'm Cara Swisser. Scott is off
00:00:20
still. I don't know where Scott is. He's
00:00:22
just off rambling around. Actually, I'm
00:00:24
going to see him tonight at the premiere
00:00:25
of my uh new series for CNN. Uh, but I
00:00:28
brought on another incredible co-host.
00:00:30
He's been ambassador to Japan and the
00:00:33
mayor of Chicago. It seems like he's
00:00:35
running for president. It's Rahm
00:00:36
Emanuel. Hey, Rah. How you doing?
00:00:38
>> I'm good. How are you?
00:00:40
>> Good. Good. You have been everywhere.
00:00:42
What What's happening?
00:00:43
>> Try to tell us what's happening besides
00:00:45
lecturing the Democratic party, which
00:00:46
we'll get to in a minute. But what what
00:00:49
what are you doing?
00:00:50
>> Well, um, first of all, I'm listening to
00:00:51
American people. been out and uh talking
00:00:54
to them about things like how to make
00:00:56
sure they get ahead, their families get
00:00:58
ahead on the community college plan. Uh
00:01:00
but also, you know, like a young man I
00:01:02
met in Spartanberg who's going to
00:01:03
community college, he's got a job
00:01:05
waiting at GE for 33 an hour with
00:01:08
benefits and he was unemployed. And what
00:01:10
they're doing at that community college
00:01:11
is exactly what I want to see us do
00:01:13
everywhere. Something similar we did in
00:01:14
Chicago, something similar lacrosse. but
00:01:17
also, you know, listening to the nurse
00:01:19
in Iowa who's talking about that she now
00:01:21
spends close to 50% of her time arguing
00:01:23
with the insurance companies. So, and
00:01:26
about how to make sure that people get
00:01:27
the healthcare that they're actually her
00:01:29
and the doctor are prescribing.
00:01:30
>> You've been a public figure, but often
00:01:32
in the in the in the national way,
00:01:34
you've been a sort of behind this and
00:01:36
you've been a congress person, but how
00:01:38
do you how is it different what you're
00:01:39
doing here in terms of running for
00:01:41
president or trying or thinking about
00:01:43
running for president?
00:01:44
>> Yeah, I mean that's fair. Look, I mean,
00:01:45
I've been a congressman. I've been a
00:01:47
mayor of both.
00:01:48
>> Not insignificant.
00:01:49
>> Front facing. Yeah. Front facing.
00:01:51
>> Yeah. Also chairman of a leadership in
00:01:54
Congress. But that said, I mean, you're
00:01:57
evaluating uh and one of the things I
00:02:00
know about running for office uh is you
00:02:02
got to make sure your head, your heart,
00:02:03
and your gut are all align.
00:02:05
>> Uh I I'm going to just say it up front.
00:02:07
I don't need a title.
00:02:10
I got more titles. I can auction them
00:02:12
off. I'm also I'm about getting stuff
00:02:15
done. Like take something I'm very proud
00:02:17
about. You know this because from our
00:02:18
many conversations, we raised our
00:02:20
graduation rate from 56 to 83%. 98% of
00:02:25
our kids had a pan post high school
00:02:27
college community college branch of the
00:02:29
armed forcification school. I'm not I'm
00:02:31
about getting stuff done, not about
00:02:33
getting another title. and do I think I
00:02:36
actually understand what it takes to
00:02:38
move this country and move help the
00:02:39
American people get ahead and their kids
00:02:42
get ahead and do I have the fortitude to
00:02:44
do that and so that's what what I'm
00:02:46
looking at I'm not I don't need as I
00:02:48
said titles is for other people getting
00:02:51
crap done is what we did in Chicago
00:02:53
20,000 kids went to community college
00:02:55
for free every child had a plan post
00:02:57
high school on education we started prek
00:03:00
and kindergarten so I'm into moving
00:03:03
stuff and as I We like to say in
00:03:05
Chicago, taking the garbage out, getting
00:03:07
stuff done. And
00:03:08
>> so what
00:03:08
>> do I think I do? I So you evaluate that,
00:03:12
>> right?
00:03:12
>> But you know, this also takes I jokingly
00:03:15
said when I was recruiting candidates
00:03:16
for Congress,
00:03:18
>> takes a a little level of a little kind
00:03:20
of irrational act because you're jumping
00:03:23
over without uh any nothing below and
00:03:25
nothing above. Mhm. So if you're like
00:03:28
Ram Rahm Emanuel evaluating you as a
00:03:30
competitor, what would be your biggest
00:03:32
asset and your biggest negative from
00:03:34
your perspective? If you were like, I'm
00:03:36
going to get this. Let's go ahead. This
00:03:39
I'm getting on the couch and we get to
00:03:40
make sure Blue Cross covers that at one
00:03:42
level
00:03:44
on the positive side and here's how I
00:03:46
stand it is
00:03:48
>> putting out ideas from like we did on
00:03:51
elementary uh school and learning and
00:03:53
reading and addressing the 50% of our
00:03:55
kids can't read. went to Mississippi
00:03:58
how to reform our high schools so
00:03:59
they're less about diploma more about
00:04:01
college career planning and community
00:04:02
college educational ed to social media
00:04:05
ban basically a wealth of ideas I am
00:04:07
tired of having a debate about how to
00:04:09
restore a past and about how to build a
00:04:12
future and that is what I'm so on that
00:04:14
point get an A uh on the kind of
00:04:18
strength and energy that is determined
00:04:20
not only for the job
00:04:21
>> Mhm. uh bringing there uh an agame as
00:04:24
well. And I also think more importantly
00:04:27
>> telling people the truth.
00:04:28
>> I'm not going to tell you what you want
00:04:29
to hear. I'm going to tell you what I
00:04:30
think you need to know and we're in this
00:04:32
together rather than trying to fight
00:04:34
each other all the time. And that's a
00:04:36
rare moment for a middle child to say
00:04:37
that. Uh on the other side is you have a
00:04:41
campaign which is slightly about it's
00:04:43
not slightly there's a big debate about
00:04:46
generational change and I've been
00:04:48
around. Now, the good news of that is uh
00:04:51
I I think I know the family room. I know
00:04:54
what I could call uh the classroom, the
00:04:57
break room, the boardroom, the situation
00:04:59
room, and I want the Democratic party to
00:05:00
get out of the bathroom. I'm tired of
00:05:02
being there. That said, you're all your
00:05:05
strengths are your weaknesses. So, the
00:05:07
long resume, I can hit the job one. The
00:05:10
problem with the uh resume is in a
00:05:11
period of change, you're you kind of
00:05:13
don't represent that from one level. The
00:05:16
other part of change though is for a
00:05:19
party known for its weakness.
00:05:21
>> I don't bring that. I bring a different
00:05:22
level of strength.
00:05:23
>> Sure. Right.
00:05:24
>> So that's how I evaluate it.
00:05:25
>> Is it I'm just curious. Is it Do you
00:05:27
ever worry about like you and I are both
00:05:29
I would say difficult people in a good
00:05:31
way necessarily and I'm I'm saying that
00:05:33
about myself too. And
00:05:34
>> we're let's just let's do it smoother.
00:05:36
We're we're acquired taste,
00:05:38
>> right? That's what I mean. We're
00:05:40
acquired taste. Do you I mean cuz you
00:05:42
know there's there's a there's a a
00:05:44
likability kind of thing and I I like
00:05:46
you but do you think about that or has
00:05:48
that changed in in in
00:05:50
>> No, you know uh no because uh first of
00:05:54
all I know how I am out with I'm out
00:05:57
about people where I was in Lacrosse
00:05:59
Wisconsin in Grand Rapids Michigan in
00:06:03
Franklin New Hampshire or in the uh what
00:06:06
is referred to in South Carolina as a
00:06:08
corridor of shame and Abbyville etc. all
00:06:10
the black counties that were ignored by
00:06:14
uh Colombia, South Carolina. So, I know
00:06:17
that on the other hand, I am I am I
00:06:19
mean, again, this gets back to this is
00:06:21
true for you, it's true for me, it's
00:06:22
true for everyone, which is your
00:06:23
strengths, your weakness. I'm direct.
00:06:25
I'm forthright. Nobody walks away from
00:06:27
me and go, "Boy, was he subtle? We
00:06:29
didn't really know what he said." Uh,
00:06:31
now that one level
00:06:34
>> that works. At another level,
00:06:36
>> it doesn't. And that, but here's the
00:06:38
thing. I'm at a point in my life
00:06:40
This would be the last race. I'm going
00:06:41
to tell you what I think has to happen.
00:06:43
As I said, in 2024, you didn't have a
00:06:46
choice. 2028, it's going to be Baskin
00:06:48
and Robbins. And I plan on being Rocky
00:06:50
Road.
00:06:50
>> Right. Rocky Road.
00:06:52
>> I'm I'm going to say this is in this
00:06:53
moment of where I'm with my therapist,
00:06:55
Miss Dr. Swiss or
00:06:56
>> Yeah, right. That's me.
00:06:58
>> I am liberated at a different place than
00:07:00
I've been as President Obama's chief of
00:07:02
staff or as mayor or ambassador or
00:07:04
whatever.
00:07:05
>> I'm going to This is it. Final race. I'm
00:07:09
going leave it on the field in the sense
00:07:10
of we as a country
00:07:14
literally have hunger games. I'm This is
00:07:17
about the future. We've had two
00:07:19
presidents who've argued about restoring
00:07:21
a past that's not coming back and either
00:07:23
we're going to build that future or
00:07:25
we're going to talk about America in
00:07:26
past tense and I don't want to do that
00:07:27
and I'm not going to selines commenting
00:07:30
about it.
00:07:31
>> Yeah. Yeah. You've run out of but
00:07:32
you never had Fox Rom. So that's that's
00:07:34
kind of an interesting situation. This
00:07:36
is really interesting. I really am
00:07:38
fascinated. You know, a lot of people
00:07:39
ask me, I'm like, I don't know. Maybe
00:07:40
it's appealing to people, right? You
00:07:42
don't have to be slick. You don't have
00:07:43
to be likable, you know, and obviously
00:07:46
Trump has turned from he had a charisma
00:07:48
to something else. That's really good.
00:07:50
>> But I don't, you know, the one thing I
00:07:52
know about presidential politics,
00:07:55
President Obama was an answer to George
00:07:56
Bush. George Bush was an answer to Bill
00:07:58
Clinton. Bill Clinton was an answer to
00:08:00
the Reagan Bush years.
00:08:02
Not where is Donald Trump. You're
00:08:04
interested in clicks.
00:08:07
I'm not that. I'm interested in kids
00:08:09
knowing calculus. You're interested in
00:08:11
social media posts. Great. I'm
00:08:12
interested in making sure we know our
00:08:14
social studies. So, that's not it. And I
00:08:16
think where the puck will be in 2028
00:08:19
isn't about how do you how do you
00:08:21
imitate Donald Trump? It's actually how
00:08:24
do you act like an adult? And I think if
00:08:26
we're all honest with ourselves, I do
00:08:29
look, President Biden, uh, Build Back
00:08:32
Better,
00:08:34
>> Donald Trump's MAGA is about restoring
00:08:36
something that is not coming back. The
00:08:39
sooner we get to figuring out a future
00:08:41
and then how to work together to get
00:08:43
that done will actually matter. And the
00:08:48
reason all the things I happen to think
00:08:51
education is a ticket to the middle
00:08:53
class and to families making it and your
00:08:55
kids making it.
00:08:57
>> The reason I've been so focused on it is
00:08:58
you're not getting there with 50% of our
00:09:01
kids not able to read at grade level.
00:09:03
You're not getting there when we don't
00:09:06
have a plan how to make sure that we
00:09:08
have the electricians, the carpenters,
00:09:10
the sailors, the nurses,
00:09:12
>> or the chemical engineers. not just
00:09:14
people who know how to do fast trading
00:09:17
on the stock market, but the engineers
00:09:18
that know how to actually build
00:09:19
something for the future. Uh that to me
00:09:22
is more important. And if it's not
00:09:25
rejected, my ego is not hurt. I'll have
00:09:28
done what I think I think is important
00:09:29
to shape the debate and get us focused
00:09:31
on the future in a way that I think the
00:09:34
last 20 years focused on the past.
00:09:36
>> It certainly can't be anti-Donald Trump
00:09:39
or it can be a little bit as you said. I
00:09:40
remember you said let's make the to 2026
00:09:43
anti-Donald Trump and then we leave him
00:09:45
behind in the dust bin like if they win
00:09:48
2026 is we just coming in the shadows of
00:09:51
Wisconsin. It is a referendum on Donald
00:09:54
Trump and a rubber stamp Republicans.
00:09:56
2028 is a choice election and unless we
00:09:59
have a compelling story to tell about
00:10:00
the future and what we're going to do,
00:10:03
we won't win that. We have to have a
00:10:06
compelling story and that is my focus
00:10:08
not only for the campaign but more
00:10:09
importantly for the country and that
00:10:12
also I can tell you from being all over
00:10:15
the country we have to make common cause
00:10:18
with the largest party in America which
00:10:20
is independent non-aligned
00:10:23
stop talking to ourselves and start
00:10:24
talking to the people that will
00:10:25
determine because in the last three
00:10:27
presidential elections seven states
00:10:30
700,000 voters have determined who's
00:10:32
president of the United States and if we
00:10:34
don't find common pause with quote
00:10:36
unquote independent voters, right?
00:10:38
>> We will continue to be a minority party.
00:10:40
>> That was exactly what my political just
00:10:42
told me in an interview I did with him
00:10:43
last week. Same thing. Um, so let's get
00:10:46
to the news then. Let's talk about
00:10:47
what's happening right now and we'll
00:10:49
talk a little bit more about the future
00:10:50
after that. But as of this recording,
00:10:52
the Iran, this is an important thing for
00:10:54
the future. The Iran war ceasefire is
00:10:56
looking a little shaky. There's
00:10:57
confusion around the status of the
00:10:58
Strait of Hormuz and the disagreement
00:11:00
over whether the truce includes Lebanon.
00:11:03
Uh the truce includes Lebanon. Trump
00:11:05
announced a two-we ceasefire on Tuesday
00:11:06
night. Two weeks is always his magic
00:11:08
number. He backed down from his threat
00:11:10
of a whole the whole civilization would
00:11:12
die if the deal wasn't released. Um
00:11:14
reached. Jimmy Kimmel called it the taco
00:11:17
Tuesday of all. Taco Tuesday. Um and
00:11:20
then of course, you know, it's um you
00:11:22
know, walk back Wednesday essentially.
00:11:25
Uh Megan Kelly, I'm going to play her. I
00:11:26
don't usually do it because she gives me
00:11:28
a headache. Wasn't too happy either. Um
00:11:31
but listen to this. Listen to this.
00:11:33
Let's play it.
00:11:34
>> I don't know about you, but I am sick of
00:11:36
this I'm just I'm I'm sick of it.
00:11:40
Can't he just behave like a normal
00:11:43
human? I mean, honestly, like the
00:11:45
president, 3D chess, just shut up.
00:11:49
shut up about that You
00:11:52
don't threaten to wipe out an entire
00:11:54
civilization. We're talking about
00:11:57
civilians just casually in a social
00:12:00
media post.
00:12:02
I don't often agree with Megan, but
00:12:04
there you go. I think she's sort of
00:12:06
articulating what's happening on the
00:12:07
right.
00:12:07
>> Donald Trump's bringing people together
00:12:09
rather than dividing them. You like
00:12:10
Megan Kelly. Think of the upside of this
00:12:12
a new a new level of humanity in you
00:12:16
that's been found towards people you
00:12:18
disagree.
00:12:18
>> It's not humanity. It's like are you I
00:12:20
agree with her. And I I find
00:12:22
common cause with Marjorie Taylor Green,
00:12:24
right? Until I start talking about some
00:12:26
other topics. But Pope Leo is also
00:12:28
weighing in calling the threat against
00:12:29
Iranian people truly unacceptable. He's
00:12:31
in a his for some reason Trump's gotten
00:12:33
in a beef with the pope which is
00:12:35
terrible. In terms of what happens next,
00:12:37
Vice President JD Mance is traveling to
00:12:38
Pakistan to for peace talks this weekend
00:12:40
along with Steve Witco and Jared
00:12:42
Kushner. Uh Dumb and Dummer Trump says
00:12:45
that all US military personnel and
00:12:47
assets will stay near Iran until real
00:12:49
agreement is reached. Talk a little bit
00:12:51
about this. You've been in these rooms.
00:12:52
Like what is It seems like he's not
00:12:55
playing chess. he's eating the pieces
00:12:57
like or or something or maybe he's not
00:12:59
getting good advice or else he's
00:13:00
cognitively has
00:13:02
>> I don't want I don't want to just say
00:13:04
about the room but
00:13:06
>> it's clear there isn't a situation room
00:13:08
they've moved it into the oval office
00:13:11
and whoever walks in there's a couple
00:13:13
doors there's four doors there's there's
00:13:15
one outside there's one to the uh you
00:13:17
know where the assistant lit sit there's
00:13:19
one to the goes to the roseell room and
00:13:21
there's one that also goes to the uh
00:13:23
first president's library and they've
00:13:25
moved
00:13:26
all in there. There's not a serious
00:13:28
analysis. Uh think about this. You have
00:13:31
Vice President B is going there. You
00:13:33
have Wickoff and uh and Jared Kushner
00:13:36
with no diplomatic uh support. Go back
00:13:39
to when they're meeting uh in Geneva.
00:13:42
There was no experts around the nuclear
00:13:44
capacity or everything. Wikoff and
00:13:46
Kushner were winging it and it clearly
00:13:48
showed because the UK intel officer who
00:13:51
was there
00:13:52
>> said Iran was actually offering us
00:13:55
something very serious in the sense of
00:13:57
concessions to avoid the military
00:13:59
confrontation and neither Kushner or W
00:14:03
>> understood it. Now
00:14:05
>> I said this jokingly but I'm very
00:14:06
serious. if they ever do a sequel to
00:14:08
Dumb and Dumber, there's going to be a
00:14:09
lot of competition for who gets to play
00:14:11
the lead in this administration.
00:14:13
>> Right
00:14:13
>> now, the other piece is, and you led on
00:14:16
this, and we're talking about what Megan
00:14:17
Kelly uh said. Um, look, there's a lot
00:14:21
of different roles to the president.
00:14:24
There is the moral voice of the
00:14:27
presidency when the challenger goes
00:14:29
down, you know, bringing the country or
00:14:31
9/11 like President Bush. There is the
00:14:33
commanderin-chief
00:14:35
which is the most solemn position of the
00:14:37
president of the United States.
00:14:40
The president the commanderin-chief
00:14:44
Roosevelt understood it when he said
00:14:45
America would be the arsenal of
00:14:47
democracy.
00:14:49
Lincoln understood at the beginning of
00:14:50
the war. He understood it midway when he
00:14:52
did the Emancipation Proclamation
00:14:54
changing the definition of the war. We
00:14:56
have a president of the United States
00:14:57
who has asked 50 plus thousand
00:15:00
servicemen and women, not counting all
00:15:02
the other pieces that are supporting
00:15:03
those 50,000 on the front line to
00:15:05
achieve a mission of national security
00:15:08
importance for the United States. And
00:15:10
he's talking about obliterating a
00:15:11
civilization. You owe the troops a
00:15:14
definition of why. You owe the
00:15:16
servicemen and the country. You owe the
00:15:18
servicemen here's what victory will look
00:15:20
like. So, we've accomplished our goals
00:15:22
and here's how it's going to end and
00:15:24
this is how we know we have succeeded in
00:15:26
one and two. None of that by the
00:15:29
commander-in-chief has been
00:15:30
accomplished.
00:15:31
>> Right. They declare they have been
00:15:33
declaring victory over and over in
00:15:34
Carol.
00:15:35
>> But but but but this is what I say. But
00:15:38
here, step back underneath what you just
00:15:41
said. You know, and everybody else in
00:15:43
the world knows except for people of
00:15:44
1600 Pennsylvania. Nobody believes our
00:15:46
president. Now, this has been overused
00:15:48
as an anecdote. When Stevenson goes to
00:15:51
see De Gaul during the Cuban missile
00:15:52
crisis, he's about to take photos out.
00:15:55
>> De Gaul says,
00:15:56
>> "I have the word of the president of the
00:15:58
United States. I don't need those
00:15:59
photos." Nobody would do that here.
00:16:01
Everybody is looking at our our Keystone
00:16:04
cops at 1600 Pennsylvania. They know a
00:16:07
president of the United States who
00:16:08
literally truth is the most flexible
00:16:10
thing he's ever seen. He doesn't believe
00:16:12
in truth. He believes in spin. And so
00:16:15
this is the degradation of the word, the
00:16:18
credibility and the and the mantle of
00:16:20
the president of the president of the
00:16:21
United States and more importantly the
00:16:22
United States of America because this is
00:16:24
a baton that gets handed off. So at
00:16:27
every level, not only did they start not
00:16:30
knowing that they actually had
00:16:32
accomplished something, they were too
00:16:34
foolish and stupid and arrogant to know
00:16:36
that. B, they go into a war without
00:16:38
clear objectives
00:16:40
and then they literally talk about a
00:16:43
victory here. Now I have I thought about
00:16:45
the you know there's two points I would
00:16:47
make right now
00:16:49
>> because they went into a war to
00:16:51
obliterate degradate whatever word you
00:16:54
want to use the nuclear capacity of
00:16:56
Iran.
00:16:56
>> They already had even we obliterated
00:16:59
then we obliterated it again and then
00:17:01
now we're going to obliterate it. He was
00:17:02
even making fun of the of
00:17:04
>> Iran discovered they have a nuclear
00:17:05
operation called the straight of
00:17:06
hermoose. So, first and foremost,
00:17:09
declare a policy either all ships get
00:17:11
out or no ships get out. That would cut
00:17:15
off Iran's economic lifeline to China
00:17:17
and would put pressure on both of them.
00:17:20
two m medium-term
00:17:23
the United Nations international
00:17:25
maritime uh group would run the straight
00:17:28
of Hermuz in the sense of a fee that
00:17:30
would be split between Iran, Bahrain,
00:17:33
UAE,
00:17:35
Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, all the countries
00:17:37
affected. So they don't collect it. The
00:17:39
United Nations and international
00:17:41
association does. And it's split because
00:17:43
the war affected both parties, not one
00:17:45
party. Third and doesn't allow Iran to
00:17:48
control the straight arm which is an
00:17:50
international body of water body
00:17:52
long-term
00:17:54
take the Abraham Accords for the United
00:17:56
States as a party to and do three things
00:18:00
and use it which doubles down on America
00:18:03
as a permanent power in the in that part
00:18:05
of the world which is the Iran's goal
00:18:08
which is to get us out to build
00:18:11
pipelines for Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, UAE
00:18:17
and other countries in that region out
00:18:19
to the straight of Hermuz to the Red Sea
00:18:21
or to Oman uh Gulf, the Gulf of Oman
00:18:24
that would have a short-term,
00:18:26
medium-term, long-term plan and would
00:18:28
also reinforce that the Abraham Accords
00:18:30
the United States has is the vehicle for
00:18:33
our Gulf allies and countries that don't
00:18:35
become now subjugated to Iran's
00:18:38
blackmail and corrosion uh coercion. To
00:18:41
me, that is the most important. Now, I
00:18:44
don't think, in fact, I can tell you
00:18:45
this since I haven't seen a single idea
00:18:48
where except for the president says,
00:18:49
"Well, Iran's 10 points are pretty
00:18:51
good." I can't believe a president of
00:18:52
the United States, a commander-in-chief,
00:18:54
a leader of the free world, a person
00:18:56
with a military uh instruments that he
00:18:58
has, just said the other party,
00:19:02
their term sheet is the term sheet we're
00:19:05
going to work off of. Everybody in the
00:19:07
quote unquote art of the deal, you don't
00:19:09
use the other side's term sheet. So at
00:19:12
every level I find this uh incredibly
00:19:15
dangerous, reckless. What is it?
00:19:17
>> What's occurring here? Because his own
00:19:18
people are like he doesn't know. Like
00:19:20
what was really interesting about the
00:19:21
the New York Times piece is like they're
00:19:23
all running for the hills cuz they're
00:19:25
all telling them wasn't me. Wasn't me.
00:19:27
It was him.
00:19:28
>> They're pointing fingers at him
00:19:30
directly, not or at BB Netanyahu, but
00:19:33
they're certainly trying to say, "I
00:19:35
thought it was Farc." That's obviously
00:19:37
from the head of the CIA. I thought it
00:19:39
was wrong. Susie Wilds, etc., etc.
00:19:42
>> Yeah. No, they're going to let they're
00:19:43
going to let one guy wear the the guy
00:19:44
with the duncap gets to keep the duncap
00:19:46
at the end of this process. Here's what
00:19:48
I would say to you is there are four
00:19:51
tools in your national security uh
00:19:54
toolbox. Military power, economic
00:19:57
statecraft, political persuasion, and
00:20:01
cultural attraction. And you will
00:20:03
assemble them
00:20:05
differently in different parts of the
00:20:06
world, in different areas, etc.
00:20:09
somewhere in the second term. The now
00:20:12
the president degraded the first three,
00:20:14
but in the second term as opposed to the
00:20:17
first term, he's decided military power
00:20:21
is the most not only the most important
00:20:23
tool, the tool he's most comfortable,
00:20:24
which was not true in the first term. He
00:20:27
is degraded through tariffs. He's
00:20:30
degraded through belittling our NATO
00:20:32
allies and not consulting them and the
00:20:34
brand of America from a cultural
00:20:36
standpoint. So all three of the four
00:20:38
tools have been totally drained of any
00:20:42
capacity and a person who was risk
00:20:45
averse in the first term is now reduced
00:20:48
America's national security to a single
00:20:50
tool and made it the toolbox and what is
00:20:54
dangerous about that is obviously the
00:20:57
servicemen and women uh are becoming
00:21:01
literally a play toy for the
00:21:02
commander-in-chief with no respect for
00:21:04
the what he's asking of them who have
00:21:06
volunteered ed to serve the national
00:21:08
interest of this country and more
00:21:10
importantly the other tools are
00:21:13
atrophying at this very time and we
00:21:16
economically politically culturally as
00:21:18
you can see the way he's banging out of
00:21:20
NATO are more isolated than leading you
00:21:23
can't be a leader if nobody is following
00:21:27
that was the casualty here our NATO
00:21:29
allies and our Gulf allies and our Asian
00:21:33
allies are not following the United
00:21:35
They're distancing themselves
00:21:38
in that case. What is what happens next?
00:21:42
Cuz his own people are distancing
00:21:44
themselves. Also, speaking of leaders,
00:21:46
>> watch what he does. He's going to blame
00:21:48
somebody.
00:21:49
>> He's now going to the next thing is who
00:21:51
he tries to blame. And that's kind of a
00:21:53
palace coup type, palace, you know,
00:21:55
intrigue game.
00:21:56
>> I'm into not that. And I understand the
00:21:59
lore of that. My thing is what do we do
00:22:03
to take a generational approach to
00:22:05
restore the trust, credibility, and the
00:22:07
capacity of this country?
00:22:09
>> Well, how can we with him in the seat?
00:22:11
He's in the seat. Whether I mean some of
00:22:14
the seat
00:22:15
>> and this is my argument both to
00:22:17
Democrats but also Republicans as a
00:22:18
country.
00:22:19
>> Mhm.
00:22:20
>> We're Americans. There's no reset button
00:22:23
at the Resolute Desk. I try to lay out a
00:22:27
different scenario by different parts of
00:22:28
the world. How do you assemble these
00:22:30
different tools into different kind of
00:22:31
stacking orders of priority? There's no
00:22:34
reset. So the when Carne when Prime
00:22:36
Minister Carney in Canada says this is a
00:22:39
rupture, you're not getting superlue and
00:22:42
reassembling. We have to earn not only
00:22:44
the trust, we have to build our
00:22:46
strengths that have been atrophying.
00:22:48
Where is the political uh power? Where's
00:22:51
the cultural persuasion? How do we
00:22:53
recreate the economic state craft where
00:22:56
again the American economy is central to
00:22:58
the world not sidelined and I do think
00:23:01
the last 25 years when you look at this
00:23:05
war if you look at covid you look at uh
00:23:07
different things that have happened in
00:23:08
the last 25 years this will be the era
00:23:11
of supply chain uh and will be known as
00:23:14
the era of supply chain you took oil
00:23:16
take uh ammonia take the petrochemicals
00:23:20
of the region you take what happened
00:23:21
during covid medical gear
00:23:23
etc. and the pharmaceutical products to
00:23:25
deal with the vaccines. This is the era
00:23:29
of supply chains, little things that
00:23:32
hold the entire whether it's the
00:23:33
straight of Hermoose or whether it's the
00:23:36
products coming out of the straight of
00:23:37
Hermoose or whether it's medical
00:23:39
supplies and vaccines, little things
00:23:42
take the entire global economy to a
00:23:44
whole drone. A drone a $50,000 I said
00:23:48
this the other day and I'll just repeat
00:23:49
this. You have two countries Mhm. with
00:23:52
no navy, but they control both
00:23:54
waterways, Ukraine and Iran,
00:23:56
>> without a navy. We have a theory in
00:23:59
America's national security being able
00:24:01
to fight two wars simultaneously.
00:24:04
>> We're going to have to rewrite it to be
00:24:05
able to fight two different wars
00:24:07
simultaneously. One conventional and one
00:24:10
unconventional.
00:24:10
>> That's it. He's still president for a
00:24:12
long time. Even, you know, you've got
00:24:14
maybe to the midterms where he loses a
00:24:16
lot of power
00:24:17
>> or three more years. What happened? What
00:24:21
from your if you had to guess what
00:24:24
happens next because they're not these
00:24:26
people look like they're not going to
00:24:27
keep. You have Megan Kelly saying
00:24:28
you. You have people in the cabinet
00:24:30
clearly leaking saying not us.
00:24:33
Something's got to give. Or does it?
00:24:36
>> Well,
00:24:36
>> I mean someone did stop Nixon, right?
00:24:38
Someone walked up to Pennsylvania.
00:24:41
I mean
00:24:42
>> Yeah.
00:24:42
>> Yeah. I mean, I don't want to look. I
00:24:44
didn't listen to the podcast with
00:24:47
Senator Tillis.
00:24:48
>> Mhm.
00:24:48
>> But, you know, I I this is a criticism.
00:24:52
You were the you were the key vote for
00:24:54
headsets becoming Secretary of Defense.
00:24:55
I'm sorry. Like, you know, okay, fact is
00:24:59
you have a person with a drinking
00:25:00
problem and other types of problems who
00:25:02
now the head of a military who's
00:25:04
involved right now
00:25:06
>> in a military political purge of the
00:25:09
military. The greatest turnaround in
00:25:11
American history was the armed forces
00:25:13
post Vietnam. I've worked with the the
00:25:16
head of the seventh fleet, head of
00:25:18
Indopaccom. These are incredible men and
00:25:20
women. Amy and I I just want to side
00:25:22
note. We do a ROC scholarship named
00:25:26
after Lisa Franchetti, the former CNO of
00:25:29
the Navy. She's an incredible capacity.
00:25:32
Fired out of political retribution. This
00:25:35
is stuff you read in China,
00:25:36
>> right? and Senator Tillis who obviously
00:25:39
has found his conscience and that's good
00:25:42
>> but you confirmed this person that you
00:25:44
knew in your gut
00:25:47
>> was not right and I want to say one
00:25:48
thing when I was chief of staff I was an
00:25:50
employee when I was senior adviser to
00:25:51
president I was an employee how many
00:25:53
times I've walked into the Oval Office
00:25:54
daily and said no and here's the
00:25:57
consequence of you you're a US senator
00:25:59
you're independently elected you're
00:26:01
independently elected congressman you
00:26:02
have your own voting card you have your
00:26:04
own pin for security what are you doing.
00:26:06
>> Mhm.
00:26:07
>> You imagine they'll do it or are they
00:26:09
just waiting for the end?
00:26:11
>> I think what's going to happen is the
00:26:12
United States Congress is going to flip.
00:26:14
The Senate's 50/50 and you're going to
00:26:16
finally have the third branch of
00:26:17
government that has been basically in
00:26:19
deep freeze for the last two years.
00:26:21
>> I said this once privately couple
00:26:23
months, right? That's
00:26:25
>> Yes. I said this privately to a
00:26:26
Republican senator.
00:26:28
>> I said, "You're going to want a
00:26:29
Democratic president."
00:26:30
>> He goes, "Oh, no, no." I said, "Yeah,
00:26:32
the reason is you put your manhood in a
00:26:34
lock box and you're finally going to
00:26:35
take it out in about three years from
00:26:36
now, right? That's what's going to
00:26:37
happen. You I can't believe these
00:26:39
individuals who know better and say it
00:26:41
privately under cloaked force of course
00:26:43
and what will happen is elections have,
00:26:45
as to quote my good friend and my former
00:26:49
boss, President Obama,
00:26:50
>> elections have consequences. Yes, we got
00:26:53
X months till November.
00:26:56
>> Republicans doesn't hear the hear the
00:26:59
sound of the footbeat coming. You saw
00:27:00
that in Wisconsin. You're going to see
00:27:02
it in Indiana. Saw it in North Carolina
00:27:04
the other day. You saw it in Georgia.
00:27:06
>> And the fact is you're going to have the
00:27:07
third branch of government, co-equal
00:27:09
branch, finally exert its
00:27:11
responsibility.
00:27:12
>> You are you are it's just it's a matter
00:27:14
of time. We're going to move over this.
00:27:15
But I would agree with you. They're
00:27:16
suddenly appearing on my podcast. So,
00:27:18
you know what I mean? Like suddenly
00:27:19
they're like I do I wanted is so
00:27:23
frustrating. Take the take a look at the
00:27:25
center of Louisiana. Mhm.
00:27:27
>> You confirmed a guy, Health and Human
00:27:29
Services, Kennedy. You as a doctor, you
00:27:31
know, was wrong.
00:27:33
>> The president turns around, flips on
00:27:34
you, and and you try to do that to
00:27:37
encourage favor or, you know, bring
00:27:40
favor to yourself, and he's going to
00:27:41
mess with your reelection, and you knew
00:27:45
Kennedy was not right. Senator Tillis,
00:27:47
I'm glad he's speaking up. I'm I'm glad
00:27:49
he found his voice,
00:27:50
>> but when your vote was needed,
00:27:52
>> Mhm.
00:27:53
>> he decided, you decided to go somewhere.
00:27:55
out. Maybe you're making up for lost
00:27:56
time, but the rest of us, most
00:27:58
importantly,
00:27:59
>> the men and women in uniform
00:28:01
>> have to deal with a secretary of
00:28:03
defense.
00:28:03
>> And so now therefore, I mean, he
00:28:06
certainly did the I hate to use the term
00:28:07
killshot to gnome, but he did. He did.
00:28:10
And some people are like, it's too late.
00:28:11
I'm like, but he did it, so he has to
00:28:13
keep doing it is what you're saying. I
00:28:14
like that.
00:28:15
>> Yes.
00:28:15
>> Yeah. He has to keep and not only have
00:28:18
to say that, you have to work with
00:28:19
others to finally uh get your vote and
00:28:22
your voice to kind of line. Your vote
00:28:24
was not where your voice is or your
00:28:26
conscience.
00:28:26
>> Yeah, reach down and grab it. Okay,
00:28:28
Rahm, let's go on a quick break. When we
00:28:29
come back, Democrats keep the momentum
00:28:31
going with another string of election
00:28:33
wins.
00:28:34
>> Support for this show comes from
00:28:36
MongoDB. If you're tired of database
00:28:38
limitations and architectures that break
00:28:40
when you scale, it's time to think
00:28:42
outside the rows and columns. Because
00:28:44
let's be honest, you didn't get to tech
00:28:45
to babysit a broken database. You got
00:28:48
into it to actually build something.
00:28:50
MongoDB lets you do that. It's flexible,
00:28:52
developer first, acid compliant,
00:28:54
enterprise ready, and built for the AI
00:28:56
era. Say goodbye to bottlenecks and
00:28:58
legacy code. Start innovating with
00:29:00
MongoDB. There's a reason it's trusted
00:29:02
by so many of the Fortune 500, and
00:29:05
that's because it's a platform built by
00:29:06
developers for developers. They swear by
00:29:09
it, literally. They call it a great
00:29:11
database. Start building at
00:29:14
mongodb.com/build.
00:29:19
Rom, we're back. Democrats notched their
00:29:21
biggest shift yet in the House special
00:29:22
election, dramatically narrowing the gap
00:29:24
in Georgia's 14th. Trump carried the
00:29:26
district by 37 points in 2024, but even
00:29:28
in the race, the margin shranked around
00:29:30
12 points, a major swing, even though
00:29:31
the Republicans took the win. Democrats
00:29:33
also expanded their majority on
00:29:35
Wisconsin's Supreme Court, very
00:29:36
significant, from 4 to 3 to 5 to two,
00:29:38
and that'll last for for a decade, I
00:29:40
think, for something like that or a very
00:29:42
long time. You recently wrote a piece in
00:29:44
the Wall Street Journal titled How
00:29:45
Democrats can use their coming majority.
00:29:47
You say investigations of Trump won't
00:29:48
satisfy voters and that energy be better
00:29:50
spent on a positive agenda. You and I
00:29:52
have talked about this. Talk about, you
00:29:54
know, your ideal plan. You just sort of
00:29:56
vaguely mention it up to the midterms
00:29:59
and assuming they have a strong showing
00:30:01
without any um nonsense from Trump or
00:30:04
any hijinks or whatever he's trying to
00:30:06
do, but it doesn't seem like it's going
00:30:08
to work. Um in recent days, over 70
00:30:10
lawmakers have said Trump's cabinet
00:30:11
needs to invoke the 25th Amendment. Um,
00:30:14
>> uh, that's he's supposed to be in a coma
00:30:17
apparently for that, but we'll we'll
00:30:18
see. Um, I don't I don't see them doing
00:30:20
that. They can hardly speak up in any
00:30:22
way. Talk about the distraction of it
00:30:25
because one of the things is if you
00:30:26
spend all your time investigating and
00:30:28
certain people, by the way, should be
00:30:29
investigated for corruption.
00:30:30
>> No, let me let me be really clear,
00:30:34
etc. Yeah.
00:30:35
>> As I said in that piece, I said there's
00:30:36
a difference between corruption and
00:30:38
dishonesty. I'm for absolute
00:30:41
investigation of all the corruption.
00:30:43
This is crony capitalism run a muck.
00:30:47
People trading on inside information.
00:30:49
They abnormalize corruption 100% for
00:30:52
that. I the c you cross the line when
00:30:56
it's all about retribution, vindication,
00:30:59
and not addressing what I think is not
00:31:02
only the affirmative agenda, but I do
00:31:04
believe the their corruption. I've said
00:31:06
it two years ago. That's the backdrop.
00:31:09
So, I'm 100% for what did Christine
00:31:12
Gnome do at DHS? I'm 100% for everything
00:31:15
the inspector generals have reported and
00:31:17
all the type of corruption both inside
00:31:19
outside members of family
00:31:20
>> or the Trump kids
00:31:23
100% for that.
00:31:24
>> Don't get caught in a game of politics
00:31:26
of retribution where then the people go
00:31:29
it's just more Washington.
00:31:30
>> Right.
00:31:30
>> Now, on the affirm I think on the
00:31:32
affirmative and this was part of that
00:31:34
piece. If you go back to the
00:31:36
presidentials of both President Clinton
00:31:39
and President Obama first terms '08 and
00:31:41
1992,
00:31:43
what George Mitchell does in 1990,
00:31:45
forcing President Bush to raise taxes
00:31:48
and break his pledge on read my lips,
00:31:50
and what we did in forcing Bush to veto
00:31:55
the children's health insurance
00:31:57
initiative in 2007 sets up 1992 Bill
00:32:01
Clinton and sets up President Obama
00:32:04
2008.
00:32:05
2027.
00:32:08
I look at the uh kind of landscape of
00:32:11
all the issues from minimum wage to
00:32:15
predictive markets to health care cost
00:32:18
control andor a rateayers bill of
00:32:20
rights. I lay out a number of piece
00:32:22
ideas in that piece. you now a part of
00:32:25
this politically is determining you have
00:32:27
the Senate or not is get a bill on the
00:32:30
desk that one creates divisions within
00:32:33
the Republican party and two
00:32:36
either force the president like Bush
00:32:39
does in 1990
00:32:41
signs a bill or vetos a bill like
00:32:44
President Bush does in 2007 on the
00:32:48
children's health insurance program that
00:32:50
creates divisions inside the Republican
00:32:52
party and advance
00:32:54
your agenda that you're ready to take
00:32:56
and secure the future. So, I do think
00:33:00
Democrat, let's just just fast forward.
00:33:02
Democrats win both the House and the
00:33:04
Senate. What they do in 2027 will be as
00:33:08
determinative as who we nominate in
00:33:10
2028. My view, this is mine,
00:33:15
is go to those predictive markets and
00:33:18
put a piece of legislation on the
00:33:20
president's desk that ban all members,
00:33:24
Congress, Senate, executive branch,
00:33:26
judicial branch, staff, family from
00:33:29
participating in the predictive markets
00:33:31
and that there's a division of the
00:33:32
criminal market. Right. Yeah.
00:33:35
>> Yeah. And the reason is and first of
00:33:38
all, all that can be done by executive
00:33:39
order.
00:33:40
>> Mhm. president will not do it because
00:33:41
his two sons are investors in it
00:33:44
>> and you drive right there because the
00:33:46
Republicans are there, independent
00:33:47
voters are there, the president of the
00:33:49
United States is not there. And I would
00:33:50
take that bill and run it right down
00:33:52
through one end of Pennsylvania Avenue
00:33:54
to the other and put it on his desk
00:33:57
because everybody and I can tell you
00:33:58
this from Lacrosse, Wisconsin to
00:34:00
Franklin, New Hampshire to Abbyville's
00:34:03
partner,
00:34:04
>> everybody in their gut
00:34:06
>> knows that these prediction markets are
00:34:08
being played and manipulated with inside
00:34:10
information. And yes, and people other
00:34:12
people are putting their lives at risk
00:34:14
while little Nepo babies in Palm Beach
00:34:16
are making money. Most importantly, Don
00:34:19
Jr. and the rest of the family and
00:34:21
Lutnik's kids and Wickoff's kids. Put it
00:34:24
on his desk. Make him pick his wealth or
00:34:27
the American people's democracy and
00:34:29
political and economic.
00:34:31
>> I already know the answer to that.
00:34:34
>> I mean, you ask me that's what I would
00:34:35
do because you were talking about things
00:34:37
that you wish would happen probably
00:34:38
won't pass. You should do like all like
00:34:41
$25 minimum wage, whatever it happens to
00:34:43
be. It doesn't have to win it. You just
00:34:46
have to make a stance is what you're
00:34:47
talking about right now.
00:34:48
>> In 1990, in 1990, President Bush signs
00:34:52
the bill. It actually does help reduce
00:34:54
the deficit, but it creates Pap Buchanan
00:34:56
and a Republican revolt. And 20
00:35:00
Republican senators support that, but
00:35:03
the other 25 do not. In 2007 when we do
00:35:07
the children's health insurance bill,
00:35:09
President Bush 43 vetos it, but 60
00:35:13
Republicans in the House and Senate
00:35:15
align themselves with Democrat. What
00:35:17
brings us together? What divides the
00:35:20
other side? And whether it's signing or
00:35:23
vetoing as I would say to quote that
00:35:25
great philosopher, when you get to a
00:35:27
fork in the road, take it.
00:35:29
>> And that's what you want to do to the
00:35:31
Republicans,
00:35:32
>> right? And you want to constantly be
00:35:33
saying what you're for. And that says
00:35:34
what you're for
00:35:35
>> and even if you fail,
00:35:36
>> says what you're for,
00:35:38
>> who you're going to fight for
00:35:39
>> and what the other side
00:35:41
>> is willing to do. And I think this
00:35:42
president
00:35:43
>> is running a crony capitalist system.
00:35:47
It's from everywhere. It's how much you
00:35:48
pay and how much he gets. And what you
00:35:51
want to do is drive your
00:35:55
car right to that division point inside
00:35:58
the Republican party. And the
00:35:59
Republicans
00:36:00
know they're not in on this prediction
00:36:03
market in a sense
00:36:05
the way the Trump kids are. And the
00:36:06
president and I would also taunt them.
00:36:09
>> Sign an executive order.
00:36:10
>> Yeah. Do something.
00:36:11
>> No, Mr. President, you signed all these
00:36:13
other executive orders. I mean, yes,
00:36:14
here's one that you can do,
00:36:15
>> right?
00:36:16
>> He won't do it. And so drive right
00:36:17
there.
00:36:18
>> What do you make of these shifts in in
00:36:20
the the Democrats have done rather well
00:36:22
all over the place, right? Even
00:36:23
including in Palm Beach. Speaking of
00:36:24
Palm Beach, no babies, they now have a
00:36:26
Democratic.
00:36:26
>> I actually think one thing that slightly
00:36:29
uh didn't get the coverage. I mean, I
00:36:31
went up to Wisconsin 6 weeks ago for the
00:36:34
Supreme Court for Rebecca Cook in the
00:36:36
third district, Southwest Corner. In
00:36:39
Wisconsin, battleground state. First of
00:36:42
all, the Supreme Court candidate does
00:36:46
better than any of the other two from a
00:36:48
year ago.
00:36:49
The Democrats in Wisconsin win the
00:36:52
important county outside of Milwaukee.
00:36:54
That's the Republican base that counters
00:36:56
the Milwaukee vote. We now have the
00:36:58
county executives. The Supreme Court
00:37:00
nominee in the third congressional
00:37:01
district, the southwest corner where
00:37:03
Lacrosse is, etc. that Ron K used to
00:37:06
represent and is a Republican there that
00:37:08
Trump won. The Supreme Court Democrat,
00:37:11
not Democratic, but the progressive
00:37:12
candidate takes 57%.
00:37:18
Donald Trump won that with overwhelming
00:37:19
amount. That tells you if you win that
00:37:22
seat, you're winning the majority. So
00:37:25
when you look at Wisconsin at the top
00:37:28
all the way down and all the races
00:37:30
between, it's a unbelievable
00:37:33
victory and it says the same thing.
00:37:36
>> It's the independence.
00:37:37
>> Massive energy in the Democratic vote
00:37:39
base and Republican turnout depressed.
00:37:42
>> Mhm.
00:37:43
>> The two the election in North Carolina
00:37:46
>> Mhm. when Donald Trump uh endorsed a
00:37:49
state senate majority leader, the most
00:37:53
powerful Republican, he loses the
00:37:55
Republican primary.
00:37:56
>> Mhm.
00:37:57
>> That was more important than Mara Lago.
00:37:59
I get the value of Mara Lago. It's kind
00:38:01
of I get it. But the fact is power over
00:38:05
the Republican primary voters,
00:38:06
>> right?
00:38:07
>> You want to call liberation day, that's
00:38:09
liberation day. So all you Republican
00:38:11
congressmen and senators, Senator
00:38:13
Tillis, that you were scared of your
00:38:14
shadow for the last four year year and
00:38:17
four years ago, you don't have to be
00:38:18
scared of your shadow,
00:38:19
>> right? What about Texas? Obviously,
00:38:21
that's
00:38:22
>> Well, now in the Senate in Texas, I
00:38:25
think that you have a Republican primary
00:38:27
that ends up it doesn't matter who who
00:38:29
wins in one level, they're going to both
00:38:31
be a weakened candidate for the general
00:38:33
election.
00:38:34
>> Mhm.
00:38:35
>> That's what I think. Can I you know and
00:38:37
I happen to one thing I would also say
00:38:38
to my fellow Democrats
00:38:40
>> when you look at the healthc care for
00:38:44
President Obama
00:38:46
>> or the IRA the clim the climate bill
00:38:49
under President Biden
00:38:52
under the healthc care bill. Senator
00:38:54
Nelson from Nebraska
00:38:57
helps us pass that. It's the 60th vote
00:39:00
and the senator from West Virginia
00:39:04
helps pass the IRA.
00:39:08
If you don't win in purple to red states
00:39:13
as a Democrat, we're not going to get
00:39:15
the type of economic and political legis
00:39:18
and social legislation we want. The two
00:39:20
most significant pieces of legislation
00:39:22
Democrats passed in the last 20 years,
00:39:25
they clinched the vote
00:39:27
>> with a Republican,
00:39:28
>> with a senator from a state that is not
00:39:30
quote unquote safe blue. So winning in
00:39:33
Ohio, winning in North Carolina, winning
00:39:36
in Texas, winning in Iowa,
00:39:38
>> winning in places Democrats have not
00:39:41
presidentially won
00:39:43
>> is how you secure the type of
00:39:44
legislation.
00:39:46
>> Interesting. And I just met Telerico. I
00:39:48
call him the baby Jesus.
00:39:50
Anyway, what one of the things, of
00:39:52
course, look, Democrats are not
00:39:54
slathering himself in perfection right
00:39:56
now. Um, as Trump waited into the
00:40:00
California governor's race this week by
00:40:01
endorsing former Fox News host Steve
00:40:03
Hilton, who I know very well, actually,
00:40:05
mostly as a husband of someone I know
00:40:07
very well, but I actually know Steve. My
00:40:09
favorite Steve thing is he was lecturing
00:40:11
me on populism and the elites when he
00:40:13
was staying at the Bair Hotel and I was
00:40:15
like I can't afford this place
00:40:17
my friend like and you're telling me
00:40:19
about like elites. Um anyway I he's a
00:40:22
funny guy actually. There might be um
00:40:24
good news for Democrats the the the
00:40:26
Trump um backing there. But Democrats
00:40:28
have been worrying about a doomsday
00:40:30
scenario with the state's jungle primary
00:40:31
and people don't know there it's there's
00:40:34
there's not primaries is who the top two
00:40:36
are. If the two GOP candidates, Hilton
00:40:38
and Sheriff uh Chad Biano, and ex
00:40:41
exactly what he sounds like, um first
00:40:43
and second in the primary, Democrats
00:40:46
would be locked out in the general
00:40:47
election. It's a concern. And there's
00:40:48
eight Democrats in the race with no
00:40:49
clear front runner. Um but by
00:40:52
consolidating G support behind Hilton,
00:40:54
Trump may have helped reduce the
00:40:55
chances. And I've noticed both Jane
00:40:57
Vaugh and Ro Con are backing the
00:40:59
billionaire, which is unusual, Tom
00:41:02
Styer. Um uh which is fine. like all the
00:41:04
left went crazy, but I'm like, well,
00:41:06
he's he's he's different. He's he's not
00:41:09
like there's he's not Mark Zuckerberg.
00:41:11
Let me just be clear.
00:41:12
>> But um that said, there's all kinds of,
00:41:14
you know, issues there um um with with
00:41:18
what's happening there. And you've got,
00:41:20
you know, a number of candidates that
00:41:21
each have a little chunk. It's not like
00:41:23
one has the biggest chunk. So, I'm
00:41:25
sitting there, I'm like, where's Nancy
00:41:27
Pelosi hitting heads or where's Nuome or
00:41:29
what's what is happening there? And you
00:41:31
I'm sure you've spoken to them. If
00:41:33
you're running the Democratic party
00:41:34
>> mean what's happening in the Democratic
00:41:36
>> party. What has to happen there in order
00:41:38
to like knock people out? They don't
00:41:40
seem to be leaving any of them. It looks
00:41:42
like
00:41:43
>> Yeah. I don't I Well, that you know,
00:41:45
California is not
00:41:47
>> Chicago,
00:41:48
>> right?
00:41:49
>> We would find something wrong with their
00:41:50
signatures and knock them out that way.
00:41:52
>> Yeah.
00:41:53
>> You're not getting on the ballot on this
00:41:55
one. You want another race? That's
00:41:56
evidence. You know, uh I don't you know
00:41:58
I have no idea what I think the
00:42:00
leadership of the party has stood back.
00:42:02
I part of me wonders whether Kla Harris
00:42:05
thinks again like maybe I made a
00:42:07
mistake. I should have gone for that
00:42:08
office etc. Given when you look at the
00:42:10
field I think this is a jump ball. You
00:42:13
got a uh I look at it from a distance
00:42:16
but about four candidates all kind of
00:42:19
hovering within two points from each
00:42:22
other. And so my guess is the leadership
00:42:23
of the party doesn't want to put their
00:42:25
thumb on the scale prefer looking like
00:42:27
they don't have the leadership that they
00:42:29
thought they did.
00:42:30
>> So what happens? It could be. Is that a
00:42:32
bad thing for the
00:42:35
>> you know I I uh I I do buy the
00:42:37
conventional wisdom
00:42:40
>> that the president's endorsement of uh
00:42:44
Mr.
00:42:44
is a kiss of death.
00:42:46
>> Mhm. And I think that will uh bear out
00:42:49
uh and I what happens
00:42:52
eventually there's a co coalescing
00:42:55
that trigger hasn't happened yet but I
00:42:58
instinctively believe it will happen
00:43:01
well how the papers endorse what
00:43:04
something will happen that will tri that
00:43:05
will be a conversion that will convert
00:43:08
the moment it will be a catalytic
00:43:10
conversion of the moment and then there
00:43:12
will be a coalesing around a singular or
00:43:14
two candidates that catapult to the
00:43:17
front of the class
00:43:17
>> possibly.
00:43:19
Do you remember the movie Face Off where
00:43:20
they're all pointing guns at each other?
00:43:22
That's what it feels like. Someone's got
00:43:24
to put the gun down, you know, and then
00:43:25
the the pigeons fly.
00:43:27
>> It's a little early for that, but you'll
00:43:28
get that.
00:43:29
>> You'll get that. You'll get Is there any
00:43:31
candidate you think
00:43:32
>> will emerge of all those? I'm not close
00:43:34
enough to uh to uh I'm not close enough
00:43:38
to that race to I mean in the back of my
00:43:40
head I'm it will be a Democrat
00:43:43
>> and you know there's 90% of them agree
00:43:45
on the same thing so it won't uh matter.
00:43:48
Now it could I could you know obviously
00:43:50
this is electoral politics so it could
00:43:52
be totally wrong. Mhm.
00:43:53
>> Uh but so far I believe that there will
00:43:57
be a coalescing at the very end at least
00:43:59
around one if not two candidates and the
00:44:01
rest will really
00:44:02
>> be seen as a wasted vote. Um the one
00:44:05
good news is uh the president's
00:44:07
endorsement is going to uh force the
00:44:09
Democrats to kind of shape up real
00:44:11
quickly.
00:44:12
>> Shape up real quickly. Yeah.
00:44:13
Interesting. It's a real it's a real
00:44:14
wrinkled Steve is like are you kidding
00:44:16
me? I mean, my thing my thing is
00:44:19
>> Mhm.
00:44:19
>> look, take Iowa and take Ohio
00:44:24
and then take Florida and Georgia. And
00:44:26
I'll tell you why on those is
00:44:28
>> Ohio. The Democratic nominee for
00:44:30
governor, which was in Governor DeWine's
00:44:33
public health official, she's ahead. In
00:44:36
Iowa, you have an open senate, also an
00:44:38
open governor. And the a state auditor
00:44:42
in Iowa is in a very strong position. uh
00:44:45
been elected twice already statewide for
00:44:47
the governor's race and we're going to
00:44:49
have a pretty competitive uh nominee I
00:44:51
think for the Senate and I think what's
00:44:53
happening because of what the president
00:44:55
did to the rural economy the corn
00:44:58
soybean wheat farmers
00:45:00
>> business and the gone out of business
00:45:02
the rural economy is really hurting this
00:45:03
war has really touched them fertilizers
00:45:06
etc
00:45:07
>> you're going to see something in the
00:45:08
Midwest in the prairie states that's
00:45:10
going to come and bite the Republicans
00:45:12
right where they need to be bitten and
00:45:14
kicked
00:45:14
Yeah.
00:45:15
>> Then you go down to Georgia and Florida.
00:45:19
In both cases in the Democratic primary
00:45:22
are former Republican- elected officials
00:45:24
who've decided the Republican party
00:45:25
under Donald Trump's not their home
00:45:27
anymore. The Democrats are. Whether they
00:45:29
get out of the primary or not, I'm not
00:45:31
sure. But there is a 10 to 12% of
00:45:34
Republicans and I've also seen this
00:45:36
going all over the country who don't
00:45:39
identify
00:45:40
with Donald Trump.
00:45:43
Not sure about the Democrats. They all,
00:45:45
you know, they say way too left for them
00:45:47
culturally, politically, economically.
00:45:50
But you have a fraction of what we I
00:45:52
call traditional Republicans that rather
00:45:55
than a look at this election or the
00:45:57
future elections as transactional,
00:46:00
we should look as transformational.
00:46:02
They have chosen those two candidates in
00:46:05
Florida and and Georgia to see
00:46:08
themselves and their future politically
00:46:11
more at home with the Democratic party
00:46:14
than Republicans.
00:46:15
>> At least for now.
00:46:15
>> That tells you the beginning, right?
00:46:17
Well, that is the first steps
00:46:19
>> towards a realignment of coalitions.
00:46:22
>> And we as a party have to look at these
00:46:24
elections, right?
00:46:26
>> I'll give you one analysis. I Okay.
00:46:27
Because we're going to move on and
00:46:29
stuff. Yeah. Go ahead.
00:46:29
>> Okay. I'll be really quick. In 2020, you
00:46:32
had what I call Joe Biden Republicans.
00:46:35
And the real question was, were we going
00:46:37
to govern with the idea of making that
00:46:39
transformational or transactional? And
00:46:42
one of the mistakes I think made in the
00:46:44
Biden administration was rather than try
00:46:45
to unite the country, a lot time was
00:46:47
spent trying to unite the party
00:46:49
>> and we lost the bigger narrative in that
00:46:51
process.
00:46:52
>> Right. That's a very fair point. Um, I'm
00:46:53
going to move on to some business stuff.
00:46:55
Um, lots going on in this area of AI of
00:46:58
something that you've written about a
00:46:59
lot and you and I have talked about
00:47:00
social media and everything else. Now,
00:47:02
in this case, Elon Musk wants to have
00:47:04
OpenAI CEO Sam Alman and President Greg
00:47:07
Brockman removed from the company as
00:47:08
part of a case claiming the company
00:47:09
deceived him to donating $38 million. I
00:47:12
was there when that happened, actually.
00:47:13
Meanwhile, OpenAI sent a letter to the
00:47:15
California and Delaware AGs alleging
00:47:17
Musk has been working to undermine
00:47:19
OpenAI through various attacks,
00:47:20
including by working with Mark
00:47:22
Zuckerberg. I mean, this is true. Um,
00:47:24
Serge jury selection begins in this
00:47:26
high-profile trial where the tech is
00:47:28
sort of eating each other. Like, it's a
00:47:30
really interesting time. And while we're
00:47:32
talking about AI, hopefulness among AI
00:47:34
among young people has dropped to 18%
00:47:36
from 27% last year. You're welcome every
00:47:39
at tech. I'm I'm glad to help it do
00:47:41
that. Almost a third of young adults uh
00:47:43
say AI made them feel angry. Um, and
00:47:46
speaking of Elang, shortly after he
00:47:47
filed his SpaceX IPO last week,
00:47:49
speculation is growing about a merger
00:47:51
with Tesla. Um, I've been saying this
00:47:53
would happen. Let's listen to a clip
00:47:55
from last April. It looks like he's not
00:47:57
interested in making cars anymore or
00:47:59
he's making other things. He wants to
00:48:00
shift Tesla and I I think you're going
00:48:02
to merge XAI
00:48:04
X and this together in a big on the
00:48:07
whole.
00:48:08
>> Yeah. Mhm.
00:48:09
>> Yeah. I had already predicted that he
00:48:11
would put Twitter into Grock and then
00:48:13
they would put it into SpaceX and it
00:48:15
made sense for a lot of thing. Um, so
00:48:17
>> there's a whole new meaning of rollup.
00:48:19
>> Yeah. And actually there there there's a
00:48:21
story in Reuters they're going to
00:48:22
possibly make a cheaper EV which he
00:48:23
should have done four years ago but
00:48:25
that's another issue. Talk a little bit
00:48:27
that's the only answer for Tesla given
00:48:29
how the numbers are declining. He has to
00:48:30
either have a great car or he has which
00:48:33
he's not seemingly interested in a
00:48:35
really great car that sort of wins
00:48:37
everything or he has to merge them all
00:48:38
together and then he can hide the losses
00:48:40
pretty easily in this spectacular IPO
00:48:43
that's going to happen with SpaceX. Um
00:48:45
so which is hugely overvalued but that's
00:48:47
all right. people are going to buy into
00:48:49
it. So talk a little bit about what's
00:48:50
happening here in AI because there's a
00:48:52
whole shift of people not trusting these
00:48:54
people. You know, it's sort of like a
00:48:56
pox on all their houses. Which side do
00:48:58
you want to pick? Altman or Musk or
00:49:01
these people or David Sachs who's like
00:49:03
pushing the president even as the
00:49:05
numbers are declining?
00:49:08
>> I think there's three categories that I
00:49:10
kind of take back from this week. One is
00:49:14
the tech bros all basically urinating on
00:49:17
each other's leg telling you the other
00:49:19
guy it's raining outside and Americans
00:49:21
aren't going to stand for sit on the
00:49:23
sidelines literally
00:49:24
>> while Alman and Daario and Alam Musk all
00:49:29
play and fight with each other like
00:49:30
little kids in the sandbox without adult
00:49:33
supervision. The second
00:49:36
is both open AI and anthropic withhold
00:49:40
product because it's too risky to the
00:49:43
>> right. I was going to mention that too.
00:49:44
These are these are new products
00:49:46
>> that they have coming that they're
00:49:48
worried about security issues and now
00:49:50
they brought a coalition together to try
00:49:52
to patch things but quite dangerous. But
00:49:54
go ahead. And then the third thing which
00:49:56
is whether forget the motivation for say
00:50:00
Sam Alman puts uh out a kind of updated
00:50:05
AI New Deal social contract to compete
00:50:09
in my but again I shouldn't do that
00:50:12
because I said don't put aside the
00:50:13
motivation with Daario
00:50:17
own's view which is this is going to be
00:50:20
so disruptive we have to figure out not
00:50:23
only how the product and the and the
00:50:25
industry, but also how we include the
00:50:28
American people in this. So, it's a net
00:50:30
win rather than three guys win and 333
00:50:34
million lose. Those three boxes are
00:50:37
they're all overlapping.
00:50:40
Now, I step back also as a former mayor
00:50:43
and chief of staff to a president in
00:50:45
massive changing times. the government
00:50:47
is set up to kind of set up a
00:50:50
regulation, wait 30 years to see if it
00:50:52
work, which is an industrial model, and
00:50:55
you're good. You're in the post analog,
00:50:57
postdigital into something totally
00:50:59
different. And I do think when you look
00:51:02
at Daro and and Open AI deciding not to
00:51:06
put a product out, forget the boys
00:51:09
acting like boys,
00:51:12
they're
00:51:14
they are begging
00:51:16
for oversight and rules and they're
00:51:20
making it up as they go. The government
00:51:22
needs industry leaders, academics,
00:51:27
and comments in real time to be making
00:51:30
decisions in real way. We can't rely on
00:51:33
two CEOs social conscience to say I'm
00:51:35
withholding a product because it's
00:51:37
dangerous. While I appreciate that they
00:51:39
did that, that is not how this is going
00:51:41
to work. So, we're going to have to have
00:51:43
a a board that is required to update its
00:51:47
rules and regs and oversight in real
00:51:50
time with an industry that's changing at
00:51:53
a pace the government's not used to.
00:51:55
There's going to have to be principles
00:51:57
that guide it. Now, is a threat from
00:51:59
China real?
00:52:00
>> 100%.
00:52:01
from a competitive standpoint
00:52:03
>> which I find one side note
00:52:06
>> we're a country with a lot of social
00:52:09
whether you think it should be expanded
00:52:11
social insurance our country is fearful
00:52:14
from AI China has none of the social
00:52:16
infrastructure underneath it so if you
00:52:18
fail to get support healthcare
00:52:20
unemployment insurance etc and yet
00:52:22
they're hugely optimistic about AI
00:52:25
>> the countries are in different places
00:52:27
given the support that the public sector
00:52:29
and I find that just as a polit as a
00:52:32
>> they do a lot more monitoring of it. The
00:52:34
c the government does much more
00:52:36
monitoring than we do.
00:52:37
>> Well, there's a confidence since
00:52:38
somebody's going to control and that
00:52:41
you're not going to be left out on the
00:52:42
sideline. So to me, we're going to have
00:52:45
to have a real and I do think this
00:52:48
regardless of whatever my personal
00:52:51
the
00:52:53
two Sam Alman's kind of social contract
00:52:57
Dario's view that uh from anthropic that
00:53:01
we need a kind of a new agreement which
00:53:04
is the difference between kind of
00:53:05
capital versus labor but how AI will b
00:53:08
what I say democratize the benefits of
00:53:11
AI to more people from both skills but
00:53:15
also jobs and economic opportunity and
00:53:17
if you don't the American people are
00:53:19
going to data center rebell you know re
00:53:23
rebellion against it's just minor
00:53:25
compared to what's going to happen
00:53:26
>> and the government's going to have to
00:53:28
step in and do this from an executive
00:53:29
branch standpoint
00:53:30
>> but the tech the tech people are still
00:53:33
aside from those guys like David Sachs
00:53:35
was like how dare you do this this is
00:53:36
our greatest thing and is pushing Trump
00:53:39
even as this is happening and he has
00:53:41
been integral to what I think has been a
00:53:44
disaster for the tech industry in terms
00:53:45
of their imagery, right? They look like
00:53:48
villains now. They're villains now.
00:53:49
They're the villains.
00:53:50
>> Well, they are babies,
00:53:53
>> right? I mean, they're they're villains
00:53:54
and they're actually also they want to
00:53:57
take all the benefit and you're just
00:53:59
going to live in their world. Now, I'm
00:54:02
sorry, that's not how a democratic
00:54:04
capitalist system works. There is real
00:54:06
opportunity.
00:54:08
Look, given the competitiveness with
00:54:10
China, this is going to be one one like
00:54:12
fusion, like quantum computing, etc.
00:54:14
like life sciences, one of the dominant
00:54:17
uh technologies of the future, but it's
00:54:19
not going to be three winners and 333
00:54:21
million losers. That is not how we're
00:54:23
keeping score.
00:54:24
>> I think that in the end of the day, like
00:54:26
everywhere else,
00:54:29
>> industry likes regulations because it
00:54:31
sets rules, guidelines, and principles.
00:54:33
Correct. when you go back to what's
00:54:34
happening like insider training
00:54:38
>> that for the fact that businesses are
00:54:40
not calling that out this is going to
00:54:42
come back to bite you right in the butt.
00:54:43
>> That's what I said. I you know it's
00:54:45
interesting when I saw those statistics
00:54:46
and then David Sachs yammering on about
00:54:48
it. I was like you know David sit the
00:54:50
down because the American people
00:54:52
don't like what you're doing. So and
00:54:54
Trump is stupid to listen to.
00:54:56
>> What?
00:54:56
>> You have dropped the fbomb three times
00:54:58
on that side.
00:54:59
>> I know. I know. I know. I know. You can
00:55:01
do it anytime. That's more your
00:55:02
brother's thing. That's more your your
00:55:04
elderly brother's thing.
00:55:06
>> You will never find me ever saying it
00:55:08
publicly.
00:55:09
>> I know.
00:55:09
>> In my whole career. Do not do that.
00:55:11
>> I know you don't. That I'm just telling
00:55:12
you that's your brother. I have a tape.
00:55:14
Even though my mother Even though my
00:55:15
mother is deaf, she'll hear it and come
00:55:17
and grab me.
00:55:19
>> I have a voice of your brother saying,
00:55:20
"Caris Swisser, you." So, I'm going
00:55:23
to keep it for the rest of I'm making
00:55:25
thinking of making it my way.
00:55:25
>> That was probably a term of endearment.
00:55:28
>> It was. It was. It's because he didn't
00:55:29
invite me to some party. Anyway, I don't
00:55:31
want to go to his party. It doesn't
00:55:32
matter. But happy birthday. Um, all
00:55:34
right, Rahm, let's go on a quick break.
00:55:35
When we come back, we'll talk about very
00:55:37
quickly RFK getting into the podcast
00:55:39
game. Rahm, we're back with just one
00:55:41
more quick story. I regret to inform you
00:55:43
that RFK Jr. is launching a podcast. You
00:55:45
know, it's trouble. Now, the pod will
00:55:47
focus on telling the truth, especially
00:55:48
when it's uncomfortable in confronting
00:55:50
the spiritual malaise. Let's watch a
00:55:53
clip of the announcement. I guess it's
00:55:54
not quite as bad as his as his strange
00:55:57
porn movie with Kid Rock, but let's go.
00:56:00
If we want a healthy nation, we have to
00:56:02
confront the lies that have made us
00:56:04
spiritually, morally, and physically
00:56:06
sick. The time for half measures is now
00:56:09
over. We're launching a new era of
00:56:11
radical transparency in government here
00:56:13
at HHS. I hope you'll join us in our
00:56:16
mission to make America healthy again.
00:56:18
>> Oh my goodness. And of course, just as
00:56:20
there is news in the Washington Post
00:56:21
that they're trying to suppress a CDC
00:56:23
report that vaccines are good for you,
00:56:25
uh, COVID vaccine. So, just transparent
00:56:28
>> gives a whole new me. Yeah. Yeah. I was
00:56:30
going to say it gives a whole new
00:56:31
meaning to what transparency is not.
00:56:33
>> Yeah. So, is he just preparing for his
00:56:35
next career when he gets bounced or what
00:56:36
what is happening? And I hope are you
00:56:38
co-hosting his podcast?
00:56:39
>> First of all, two things. One is he's
00:56:42
preparing that, but it's also to uh
00:56:43
airbrush his past. He has been an
00:56:45
absolute horrible secretary of health
00:56:48
and human services on every measure
00:56:51
>> outside of what's happened with opiates
00:56:53
and he has nothing to do with it. United
00:56:55
States.
00:56:55
>> Best friend to measles is what I call
00:56:56
him. Best friend to measles.
00:56:58
>> Yes. measles, the lack of confidence in
00:57:01
the American CDC, our other types of our
00:57:04
life sciences, our capacities, our
00:57:07
health care cost, everything that he has
00:57:08
touched in the great tradition of this
00:57:11
administration is broken. It needed
00:57:14
repair. It needed to be strengthened.
00:57:15
And across the board, you cannot walk
00:57:17
from a single agency or department. And
00:57:19
he's been the kind of a point of
00:57:20
despair. It's the largest domestic
00:57:23
agency in the United States, health and
00:57:26
human services. and he has made a mess
00:57:29
of it and the people he's appointed have
00:57:31
made a mess of it from CDC to NIH to
00:57:34
what Medicare Medicaid
00:57:36
>> and they have done nothing
00:57:39
>> to measurably improve the health of the
00:57:41
American people
00:57:42
>> and
00:57:43
>> I will say having dealt with this as
00:57:45
both chief of staff but more importantly
00:57:47
when I helped pass the ACA or President
00:57:49
Clinton's children's health insurance
00:57:50
but as mayor of the city of Chicago 8%
00:57:53
of our workforce was driving 70% of our
00:57:57
healthare costs around chronic
00:57:59
illnesses, heart, obesity, etc. He could
00:58:02
have focused on something that actually
00:58:05
moved the needle in both dropping health
00:58:07
care costs and improving public health.
00:58:10
>> Yeah.
00:58:11
>> And rather than bring the country
00:58:12
together like everything in this
00:58:14
administration, never lose an
00:58:15
opportunity to divide Americans. They
00:58:18
have they have from the president to his
00:58:20
cabinet have found m multiple
00:58:22
opportunities
00:58:23
>> to divide people and and literally
00:58:25
repressed examples where they could
00:58:28
actually bring people together of
00:58:29
different political views to work on a
00:58:31
common issue
00:58:32
>> and shame on doctors in the Senate who
00:58:34
voted for him. I mean I just the
00:58:36
Republican would
00:58:37
>> well that gets back to you know Senator
00:58:39
Ga Senator Cassidy is going to pay the
00:58:41
price like Senator Tillis
00:58:43
>> for having basically taking your
00:58:44
conscience and put it in a lock box when
00:58:46
the vote came and you knew what was
00:58:48
right. You took the polit politically
00:58:51
expedient case and I don't want to draw
00:58:52
this to myself but since I'm on I'll
00:58:54
draw it to myself. I can't tell you how
00:58:55
many times I used to walk into Clinton's
00:58:57
office or President Obama's oh I said
00:58:59
you're out of your mind if you do this
00:59:01
this is the Christ. I'm going to let you
00:59:03
lay it out to you. You'll have a debate
00:59:04
about it, but understand the
00:59:06
consequences of this. I was an employee.
00:59:09
Get out of here. This You're an
00:59:11
independent US senator. I was a
00:59:12
congressman. I was You got elected.
00:59:15
>> You have a responsibility
00:59:17
to what the
00:59:18
>> trust has told me, you know what a
00:59:20
martyr is? He's dead. Like he was he was
00:59:23
like, you can't you can't operate from a
00:59:25
position of dead. And that I still was
00:59:27
like, I don't care. Be dead then.
00:59:29
>> You know what I mean? Cuz you'll you'll
00:59:32
say that politically. Yeah,
00:59:33
>> he may say that politically,
00:59:35
>> Mhm.
00:59:35
>> but that vote gave a license to a guy to
00:59:38
do a political purge of the greatest
00:59:40
military forces this country did, the
00:59:42
greatest turnaround this country did.
00:59:43
I've worked with these men and women at
00:59:45
all levels. The amount of dedication,
00:59:48
the amount of understanding of politics,
00:59:51
culture, history, working
00:59:53
diplomatically, working militarily.
00:59:55
Hex doesn't hold a candle any of the
00:59:58
people.
00:59:58
>> Same thing with RFK. So, you won't be
01:00:00
listening to his podcast. In other
01:00:01
words, all right. Uh, one more quick
01:00:03
break. We'll be back for predictions.
01:00:05
Okay, Rahm, let's hear prediction.
01:00:07
There's so many things. Keep it brief.
01:00:09
We got just a little time. I want to
01:00:10
play one thing at the end from NASA um
01:00:13
from the Artemis. But what is your
01:00:15
prediction?
01:00:16
>> Prediction that nobody will be held
01:00:18
accountable for playing the games in the
01:00:20
prediction market with inside
01:00:21
information. The CFTC, the SEC, the
01:00:24
Justice Department not only are asleep,
01:00:27
they're in on the scam.
01:00:29
>> Nobody for now.
01:00:32
Nobody for now under this administration
01:00:34
until they're held accountable.
01:00:36
>> And
01:00:36
>> can I do one thing personal?
01:00:37
>> Sure, please. Absolutely.
01:00:39
>> All right. My son runs a 2hour 39minut
01:00:43
marathon. He did it in Boston.
01:00:44
>> Amazing.
01:00:45
>> He's going to run the Boston Marathon
01:00:46
again. I think he'll have a personal
01:00:47
best.
01:00:48
>> Oh,
01:00:48
>> he ran a 2-hour 39 uh which was
01:00:50
incredible
01:00:51
>> in uh marathon.
01:00:54
>> I think I think this coming Boston he's
01:00:56
running again. He's going to get a
01:00:58
personal best. Oh, that's very
01:01:00
>> a prediction, a hope and a wish. And I'm
01:01:02
very proud of him.
01:01:02
>> Oh, that is amazing. You should run with
01:01:04
him. You should run with him. No, I
01:01:06
couldn't do it.
01:01:07
>> I'm not that. No, that Amy runs
01:01:09
marathons. As I always say, we're going
01:01:11
to have to do a test because I don't
01:01:12
know who your father is. I have no idea
01:01:14
about this man.
01:01:15
>> The kid's an incredible runner.
01:01:17
>> Uhhuh. Okay. And that I want to leave a
01:01:20
thing of hope. Speaking of hope, that's
01:01:21
wonderful. I one of the things I did
01:01:23
feel I think Americans really start
01:01:25
really watch this Artemis flight done by
01:01:27
NASA. It was sort of a wonderful moment.
01:01:29
All all Americans it was the numbers are
01:01:31
quite high which is wonderful. Um NASA
01:01:34
and they did a great job on social media
01:01:35
and this crew is just so wonderful. Men
01:01:38
hugging and crying and saying wonderful
01:01:41
things and laughing and it just has been
01:01:43
a real it's a wonderful group of people
01:01:45
up there and it sort of represents the
01:01:47
best of America in that regard. Kind and
01:01:50
good-hearted. NASA is preparing for the
01:01:52
return of Artemis 2 after this historic
01:01:54
moon flyby. These pictures are
01:01:55
delightful and amazing and astonishing
01:01:57
and it also makes you appreciate Earth.
01:01:59
So, let's listen to a clip from crew
01:02:01
member Christina Cook after the
01:02:03
spacecraft passed by the moon. I thought
01:02:05
it was just one of the most beautiful
01:02:07
things. Let's listen.
01:02:08
>> We will explore. We will build. We will
01:02:11
build ships. We will visit again. We
01:02:14
will construct science outposts. We will
01:02:16
drive rovers. We will do radio
01:02:18
astronomy. We will found companies. We
01:02:21
will bolster industry. We will inspire,
01:02:24
but ultimately we will always choose
01:02:27
Earth. We will always choose each other.
01:02:30
>> Just what you were talking about, Rahm
01:02:33
Maker, the head of NASA.
01:02:34
>> I actually think it was a a perfect
01:02:37
antitheical spirit to what you're seeing
01:02:41
uh out of this administration.
01:02:43
>> We'll choose Earth and we'll choose each
01:02:44
other
01:02:45
>> in a period where we did a war of
01:02:47
choice. Yeah, it was a act and it
01:02:49
touched. Look, I do think there's this
01:02:51
yearning
01:02:53
out there to actually not see our fellow
01:02:56
Americans as the enemy or the it could
01:02:59
be an opponent but from a political
01:03:01
standoint but it's not your enemy and I
01:03:03
thought she touched that human
01:03:05
conspirator and also most importantly
01:03:06
for uh the United States that's
01:03:09
something we can unify around I I don't
01:03:11
know about you I get on the you know
01:03:14
open my iPad first thing I do is see the
01:03:16
pictures they're sending
01:03:17
>> they're beautiful
01:03:18
>> and uh look at the I looked at the earth
01:03:20
from that eclipse photo which I Mhm.
01:03:22
>> was most beautiful
01:03:25
>> shot. And then there was also
01:03:26
complimentary the web telescope put out
01:03:29
new pictures of the galaxy.
01:03:30
>> Yeah.
01:03:31
>> And it's just it it it there's it
01:03:34
kindles and it's and it has that little
01:03:36
light that illuminates in you of
01:03:38
something that
01:03:39
>> uh you can as you said hopeful, proud
01:03:42
and optimistic about
01:03:43
>> and I thought her message was uh just
01:03:45
>> beautiful. It's a beautiful
01:03:47
>> family like the popes.
01:03:48
>> We have a beautiful planet. Anyway, we
01:03:50
want to hear from you. to send us your
01:03:51
questions about business, tech, or
01:03:53
whatever's on your mind. Go to
01:03:54
nymag.com/pivot to submit a question for
01:03:56
the show or call 8551 pivot. Elsewhere
01:03:59
in the Karen Scott universe this week,
01:04:00
my new CNN show, Caris Wisher Wants to
01:04:02
Live Forever, is premiering this
01:04:04
Saturday, April 11th at 9:00 p.m.
01:04:06
Eastern. Scott is actually going to
01:04:07
interview me at the premiere in New York
01:04:09
tonight. And also, your brother Zeke is
01:04:11
in it, and he's hysterical. He and I are
01:04:13
wearing Colonial Garb together, and we
01:04:16
had a ball. Um he he worked for the
01:04:18
season. He's he's he's really good. It's
01:04:21
a making of a star. Anyway, you're all
01:04:23
you're all fascinating. The Emanuals. Um
01:04:25
anyway, thank you so much for joining me
01:04:27
today. There's never a dull moment.
01:04:30
That's the show. Thanks for listening to
01:04:32
Pivot and be sure to like and subscribe
01:04:34
to our YouTube channel. We'll be back
01:04:35
next week. Scott will be back from
01:04:37
wherever the hell he's gone. Uh and
01:04:39
we're excited to have him back. But all
01:04:40
the guest hosts, Kristen Sultz, Anderson
01:04:43
Rom, uh and Anthony Scaramucci have been
01:04:45
amazing. And I really appreciate it.

Episode Highlights

  • Rahm Emanuel's Political Philosophy
    Emanuel emphasizes action over titles, focusing on tangible results in education and community support.
    “I'm about getting stuff done, not about getting another title.”
    @ 02m 15s
    April 10, 2026
  • Final Race for Emanuel
    Rahm Emanuel declares his commitment to the upcoming election as his last chance to make an impact.
    “This is it. Final race. I'm going to leave it on the field.”
    @ 07m 09s
    April 10, 2026
  • The Importance of Education
    Emanuel stresses the need for a strong educational foundation to secure a better future for children.
    “I'm interested in kids knowing calculus.”
    @ 08m 09s
    April 10, 2026
  • The Era of Supply Chains
    The last 25 years have highlighted the importance of supply chains in global economics, especially post-COVID.
    “This will be the era of supply chains.”
    @ 23m 14s
    April 10, 2026
  • Democrats Narrow the Gap in Georgia
    Democrats made significant gains in Georgia's 14th district, reducing Trump's margin from 37 to 12 points.
    “A major swing, even though the Republicans took the win.”
    @ 29m 30s
    April 10, 2026
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court Shift
    Democrats expanded their majority on Wisconsin's Supreme Court from 4-3 to 5-2, a significant change for the next decade.
    @ 29m 36s
    April 10, 2026
  • Democratic Victories in Wisconsin
    Democrats achieved significant wins in Wisconsin, indicating a shift in voter sentiment.
    “It's the independence.”
    @ 37m 36s
    April 10, 2026
  • Trump's Influence Wanes
    Trump's endorsement fails to secure victories for Republican candidates, signaling a shift in power.
    “Liberation day.”
    @ 38m 07s
    April 10, 2026
  • AI Industry Turmoil
    Elon Musk and OpenAI face off in a high-profile trial amid declining trust in AI.
    “They're the villains now.”
    @ 53m 49s
    April 10, 2026
  • RFK Jr. Launches Podcast
    RFK Jr. is launching a podcast focused on confronting uncomfortable truths. "It’s trouble."
    “The time for half measures is now over.”
    @ 56m 09s
    April 10, 2026
  • NASA's Artemis Mission
    NASA prepares for the return of Artemis 2 after a historic moon flyby. "It represents the best of America."
    “It’s a wonderful group of people up there.”
    @ 01h 01m 45s
    April 10, 2026

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Getting Stuff Done02:15
  • Final Race07:09
  • Education Focus08:09
  • Credibility Crisis15:46
  • Democratic Gains36:58
  • Republican Setbacks37:56
  • AI Controversy47:30
  • Marathon Pride1:00:43

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Anthony Scaramucci: Trump Is Waging War With "A 12-Year-Old's Mentality" | Pivot
Anthony Scaramucci: Trump Is Waging War With "A 12-Year-Old's Mentality" | Pivot
Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot
Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot
Is Trump Using the WHCD Shooting as an “Opportunity” to Push His Agenda? | Pivot
Is Trump Using the WHCD Shooting as an “Opportunity” to Push His Agenda? | Pivot