Search Captions & Ask AI

The Price of Power: Donald Trump and the Tech Broligarchs | Pivot

December 17, 2024 / 10:37

This episode discusses ABC News' $15 million settlement with Donald Trump over defamation comments made by George Stephanopoulos, the implications for media and business, and the influence of wealthy individuals in politics.

The conversation highlights the legal battle stemming from Stephanopoulos' remarks regarding Trump's liability in a civil suit brought by E. Jean Carroll. The jury found Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation, but Stephanopoulos inaccurately stated he was found liable for rape, prompting the settlement.

Experts share opinions on the broader implications of Trump's legal strategies, suggesting that businesses may feel pressured to settle to avoid potential retaliation. The discussion touches on the intersection of government power and corporate interests, with a focus on how this dynamic could affect innovation and competition in the U.S.

The episode also examines the role of tech billionaires, including Elon Musk, in shaping political landscapes and their potential miscalculations in aligning with autocratic figures. The hosts reflect on historical parallels and the current state of democracy in America.

Overall, the episode raises concerns about the future of business and governance in a climate where wealth and influence may overshadow democratic principles.

TLDR

ABC News settles with Trump for $15 million over defamation, raising concerns about media influence and corporate power in politics.

Episode

10:37
00:00:00
ABC News has agreed to pay $15 million to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Donald Trump the suit Senator on
00:00:05
comments that ABC's George stephanov made against a in a civil suit against Trump brought by egene Carroll he said
00:00:11
he was found liable for rape when he actually been found liable for sexually assaulting and defaming
00:00:17
Carol uh the judge had had had mentioned that it was in most terms that would be
00:00:22
considered that and that's I think why he said it um but in fact the the jury had found him liable for sexual assault
00:00:29
uh defamation under the terms of the settlement ABC News will donate uh the money $15 million uh to a future
00:00:37
presidential vation of Museum and Stephanopoulos and ABC Al also issued a statement of regret for the mistake um
00:00:44
many experts thought I I've talked to a dozen lawyers they thought ABC would have won and Trump is typically does
00:00:51
this a lot as a as a and so does speaking of Elam mus we just talked about him they use legal uh threats as a
00:00:56
means of of of uh having people acquest so talk a little bit about this I mean from a business point of view again it's
00:01:04
using censorship it's using legal means it's using anything but actual competition or just like things work out
00:01:13
it's more than that what we're seeing is that I mean some of us had warned that um that uh a trump ad second Trump
00:01:22
Administration would be one in which the uh coercive power of the government uh against business would become huge that
00:01:30
it mean that we're in a a mixed economy the government plays a big role uh private sector plays a big role a lots
00:01:38
of things in the private sector depend upon government decisions that are reasonably favorable um as long as you
00:01:45
have rules Norms rule of law um then that kind of works okay but if you start to
00:01:53
have arbitrary exercise and then one of the things we're worried about on tariffs um it happens to be the case
00:01:59
that the way that our trade laws are written the president has enormous discretion in tariff setting and in some
00:02:05
ways one of the worst things about Trump tariffs will be not the tariffs he applies but the ones he doesn't because
00:02:11
he can play favorites with who gets to get Exempted from a tariff there's some evidence he did that even on the
00:02:18
relatively small tariffs he imposed in the first term so if you were ABC and you're looking at uh at all the ways
00:02:26
that Trump can hurt you if he wants to uh then you you know pay protection money that's what just happened and this
00:02:34
is a much bigger thing than just competition this is basically um big business already acknowledging that
00:02:40
we've become a uh uh a protection racket pay pay for play and uh that's that's scarier than anything I mean it's uh it
00:02:51
that's uh uh is one of those reasons to wonder whether you know uh 2024 was maybe the last real election so talk a
00:02:59
little bit about because from a business from an economy point of view you can have a very robust economy even with
00:03:05
this cooperation or does It ultimately end this oligarchy and in lack of innovation which has been the Hallmark
00:03:12
of the US really um dominance and Innovation and new fresh ideas we it's really been a remarkable Run for the
00:03:19
United States over the last 40 we've had an extraordinary the last 25 years you know the uh in 2000 roughly all advanced
00:03:27
countries seemed to be about on the same level technologically the US has now pulled well ahead um and there one of
00:03:34
the pieces I've written recently says a lot of that is actually just geography there's probably room for only one
00:03:39
Silicon Valley anywhere in the world and it happens to be here but the um but a lot of it is also yeah
00:03:49
openness uh rule of law uh success depends upon upon actually producing stuff that people want and can use um on
00:03:58
being able to attract the best and brightest from around the world to work and all of that is at risk you're in a
00:04:05
situation where uh you we know that there are people with influence on Trump who who think of tech jobs as being
00:04:12
goodies to be handed out and don't not don't let foreigners have those um we know that uh we're May well be heading
00:04:21
for a situation in which um in which success in business depends upon pull with the administration depends on
00:04:29
whether you're in or out of favor um and we even have I mean uh for what it's worth uh regimes like that according to
00:04:38
an IMF meta study um it subtracts about 1% from growth year after year in year after year how do you look at with all
00:04:45
these billionaires around him and they certainly are just one it's mostly Tech that's going there but Disney just did
00:04:51
this right this is Bob Iger doing this uh making he he had had to approve of this settlement and uh he has not you
00:04:58
haven't seen him at Mar but this is his version of that right yeah um how what is that what are were you surprised that
00:05:05
it's been the tech people who had mostly stayed out of government right and until
00:05:09
they realized there was there was an interview that Mark andreon did who I've known for a long time I and largely a
00:05:15
Despicable character but um uh one of the things he said he was terrified by what Biden was going to do and he was
00:05:21
scared and that's what drove him into Trump's arm which I think is absolute Insanity
00:05:28
unlikely I mean I am actually not surprised because I'm I'm a cynic and the thing about tech by the way is you
00:05:34
know these are no longer upstart innovators that we're talk about now we're talking about people who you know
00:05:39
who were who made their their billions very very young but they're now middle-aged and um and
00:05:47
they're sitting on in many ways on on these uh Monopoly positions created by by their past efforts um and of course
00:05:56
they're going to try and Curry favor with the government the the libertarian IDE ideology was never more than Skin
00:06:02
Deep um but I also think that some of the backing Trump you know this is the classic error uh oligarchs it's funny in
00:06:12
a in a democratic rule of law Nation great wealth brings a lot of power with it uh and it's natural to think well if
00:06:22
I help elect an autocrat who will uh you know will is sympathetic to my interest
00:06:28
that th I'll have even more power but you very quickly find out that actually all of the power is on the other side
00:06:36
that the uh uh and you know I don't think analogies with Putin I mean I'm hoping that we're not going to go full
00:06:43
Putin but the analogies are really clearly there and the oligarchs who helped put Putin in power thought that
00:06:48
they had bought themselves a government and they found out that they were working for him not the other way around
00:06:54
right and if they didn't uh work for him they were you know their Fortune can disappear quite quickly Windows started
00:07:01
to look very well and then falling out of Windows I hope we don't get to the falling out of Windows stage but it
00:07:05
could right and so no this is a and that's going to happen very very fast I mean I'm I think there's a reasonably
00:07:12
strong case to that that Elon Musk and Trump will have a falling out and uh musk will not be the winner and I don't
00:07:20
know that for sure but I'm actually kind of looking forward to it to be honest okay to that where do you where does it
00:07:29
where does that break is because rich people have always been quietly running the country right the the whole idea of
00:07:35
whoever down degrees and degrees yes but what is this unprecedented I don't think
00:07:40
so right it's totally precedented this is about this the story of Putin's Russia this what about in our country
00:07:47
that there have been wealthy people behind the scenes they just aren't as performative they don't jump down at a
00:07:52
rally and show off their belly and stuff like that what how is this different I actually have had been wondering about
00:08:00
that and planning to do a little you know I'm not a historian but I think it it really is an interesting question you
00:08:06
we had a Gilded Age um in which there were enormous fortunes and and a lot of raw corruption and yet Democratic
00:08:16
institutions were not corrupted too much I mean there a lot of purchased votes and all of that but in the end when
00:08:23
people voted for something different those votes were honored uh we we didn't lose
00:08:30
um uh in some ways the essence of what America's about despite all of that and it's an interesting question to ask why
00:08:40
why didn't the uh the JD Rock fellas and the JP Morgans um you know go to the Limit why were they willing to allow you
00:08:50
Teddy Roosevelt to be elected um FDR wealthy person JFK wealthy like billionair well FDR brought us closer to
00:08:59
than we like to think but yeah um but the but the you know how did the Progressive Movement manag to flourish
00:09:07
in a time when the wealthy also had that and I don't quite know the answer although it's possible hard to believe
00:09:14
it's possible that people actually had at least some values and ideals enough to say that okay I will go this far but
00:09:20
not beyond that point I'm not so sure with this crew we'll see I'm not so sure either we'll
00:09:26
see I know I'm certain they will go as far as they take because they are perpetually grieved they're grieved Paul
00:09:32
because they're very VI they're the victims just so you know oh yeah that it's one thing I mean you would know
00:09:36
better than me but my my my really strong sense is that particularly the the tech Bros um I mean everybody loved
00:09:44
and admired them 10 15 years ago and now they're they still have more money than
00:09:49
God but yeah they're not loved and admired universally and I think that really you know I do spend enough time
00:09:55
in meetings with uh people of of various people at the top of multiple status hierarchies yeah and everybody wants to
00:10:04
be what they aren't yeah and uh and these These are people who can buy anything except except love and
00:10:11
agulation that's correct it was funny funny you say that because one of them uh was in touch with me and that like
00:10:16
see we won and I said you're still an I still think you're an and so I'm sorry can I say this but I I
00:10:24
apparently somebody used uh grock to search for the most the word most commonly used to characterize Elon Musk
00:10:30
yeah and it was

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 70
    Most shocking
  • 70
    Most talked-about
  • 60
    Most intense
  • 60
    Most surprising

Episode Highlights

  • The Power of Legal Threats
    Experts discuss how legal threats are used as a means of coercion in business.
    “It's using anything but actual competition.”
    @ 01m 07s
    December 17, 2024
  • The Risk of Favoritism in Tariffs
    Concerns arise over Trump's discretionary power in tariff settings and its implications for businesses.
    “The worst thing about Trump tariffs will be the ones he doesn't apply.”
    @ 02m 07s
    December 17, 2024
  • Tech's Relationship with Government
    The tech industry's shift towards government relations raises questions about innovation and favoritism.
    “Success in business depends upon pull with the administration.”
    @ 04m 27s
    December 17, 2024

Episode Quotes

  • This is basically big business acknowledging that we've become a protection racket.
    The Price of Power: Donald Trump and the Tech Broligarchs | Pivot
  • They can buy anything except love and adulation.
    The Price of Power: Donald Trump and the Tech Broligarchs | Pivot

Key Moments

  • Legal Coercion Discussion01:07
  • Tariff Concerns02:07
  • Tech Industry Dynamics04:27
  • Wealth and Power06:18

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown