Search Captions & Ask AI

Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot

August 27, 2024 / 18:00

This episode discusses Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign strategies, the concept of joy in politics, and leadership qualities of Harris and Trump. Key topics include fundraising, collective effervescence, and the effectiveness of positive messaging in political campaigns.

The conversation begins with Harris's campaign raising $540 million, with $82 million coming during the Democratic National Convention. The guests discuss the importance of joy and hope in energizing voters, referencing past successful campaigns by Obama and Reagan.

They analyze Harris's leadership qualities, noting her momentum and fresh energy, while also addressing the challenges she faces in defining her principles. The discussion shifts to Trump's campaign strategies, including his attacks on Biden's age and the effectiveness of his messaging.

The guests also compare the communication styles of both candidates, highlighting how Harris's approach resonates with voters. They emphasize the need for leaders to be open to dissenting opinions and the impact of groupthink in politics.

Overall, the episode provides insights into the current political landscape, focusing on the dynamics of the Harris and Trump campaigns as they prepare for the upcoming election.

TLDR

Kamala Harris's campaign emphasizes joy and hope, contrasting with Trump's negative messaging as they prepare for the election.

Episode

18:00
00:00:00
vice president kamla Harris is moving into the next phase of her campaign with the Democratic National Convention now
00:00:04
in the rearview mirror the Harris campaign said over the weekend and now raised $540 million since launching last
00:00:11
month with 82 million coming during the convention nearly a third of those donations from the conven came from
00:00:16
firsttime contributors um I wanted I I I started with the idea of joy that the Harris
00:00:22
campaign and Democrats are leaning into heavily uh we heard it mentioned in a number of convention speeches last week
00:00:27
talk a little bit about it what do you think about the politics of Joy you've written in the past about the power of
00:00:32
collective effervescence which is kind of a cooler way to say it but joy is an easier word three just three letters
00:00:38
essentially group happiness that was that was especially powerful postco can you talk a little bit about this yeah I
00:00:44
think the sociologist jhe first read about Collective effervescence is that sense of energy and purpose you get in a
00:00:50
group when you have a common goal together and I do think that's what the comma Harris campaign has created for a
00:00:55
lot of people who you know either thought Biden was too old or just weren't energized by his candidacy at
00:01:02
the same time you don't you don't want to be paana as a leader um you want people to to understand that you
00:01:09
recognize the pain and the hardship they're facing and that's why I would frame this much more as hope than Joy I
00:01:14
think Joy is about the was taken by Obama but go ahead well you you could say that but I I think in analyzing it
00:01:22
right what we're really talking about is energy people have around a possible future mhm not about the present
00:01:28
nobody's feeling Joy um around this if you know if Trump wins so I think that you know the fact that it's
00:01:35
forward-looking means it really is hope not Joy um I think it's anticipatory I think it's excitement about what's to
00:01:41
come and I do think that energizes people to vote and I think you know we we have had a a long political I guess
00:01:50
streak of you know of politicians bashing and trashing each other but I don't want to assume it always has to be
00:01:56
that way I I look for example at the campaign that holl Thomas daughter ran in Iceland for president recently where
00:02:03
she won refusing to attack her opponents running a campaign based on curiosity and hope and enthusiasm and people
00:02:11
resonated with that now Iceland is a tiny country right but I I wouldn't assume that America which is often
00:02:19
regarded as the most enthusiastic country on Earth um couldn't operate that way too and I guess I guess we'll
00:02:25
find out as people begin to turn out at the the polls what do you think Cara uh you know I think think I think it work I
00:02:30
think it's fine I don't know why they have to crap all over Joy it's like they're like a skunk at a garden party
00:02:35
it's like let them have it for a minute I mean it worked for Obama it worked for
00:02:39
Clinton it works it works it worked for Reagan right Reagan was the original morning in America guy right it's and he
00:02:45
was talking about the future I think what um I think she has pretty definitely talked about problems right
00:02:52
she just doesn't do them with a sense of shrug shoulders right like let's goward
00:02:58
dread dread right it's all I think the Biden campaign I was talking to someone in uh again this weekend and when they
00:03:05
go democracy is on the ballot I'm like oh no really I have to save democracy you know you I think it it it's
00:03:11
overwhelming and and it makes you grief stricken ironically as dark as Trump was
00:03:16
in 2016 I alone can fix this was the overwhelming message that a lot of people heard so that was a good it was a strong
00:03:24
man I can help you I can I'm big daddy kind of thing can how does you Channel it into strategy and policy um what are
00:03:32
some effective leadership qualities positive and negative you're seeing from both of them from KLA Harris and Trump
00:03:38
um you were posting about the study about uh looking at the negative impact of rudess and disrespect on team
00:03:44
performance in other fields that's all he's got at this point he he hasn't been able to Pivot to anything hopeful in any
00:03:51
fashion talk a little bit about negative qual qualities you're seeing for both of
00:03:55
them and positive well I think I think one of the things that the the Trump campaign was doing well was attacking
00:04:02
Biden on age and they did not it doesn't seem like they had much of a backup strategy once Harris took over and they
00:04:08
they seem to be scrambling quite a bit now um if I were them I would I would probably take a little bit of ownership
00:04:14
over weird and say look you know America has always been weird um weird has been
00:04:19
a driver of innovation has been you know a major source of fuel for disruption and I I think there might be a missed
00:04:25
opportunity there as a as opposed to trying to prove no no no we're normal yeah anyone who says they're not weird
00:04:31
is weird that's the thing that's I anyone who's been to high school knows that one right knows that trick um so
00:04:36
you would take over weird they can't they seem perpetually offended by it it seems to have hit quite effectively yeah
00:04:43
which which is I think surprising in some ways I wonder if part of the reason it works is because it's not as heavy as
00:04:49
the other attacks that have been tried right um you know everybody's exhausted by the Felon rapist you know immoral
00:04:57
like oh this is just so much to think about and it's also just not persuasive to people who are undecided or
00:05:03
independent because if they thought that they would have already decided not to vote for him right right so I think
00:05:09
there's a missed opportunity there what does the word why does that an effective
00:05:13
word over deplorables seem seem delst and rude and yeah it's also just I think it's not as um it's not as
00:05:21
judgmental um I think that we all know weird people that we accept M so it's a way of of saying hey you're not like us
00:05:30
without saying you know you're less than us right got that so one of the things she did I thought effectively it seemed
00:05:35
to work when she was listing a bunch of things they were doing and then she's like they're out of their damn Minds the
00:05:41
way she talked how talk about that that was effective I think maybe it wasn't but I felt it was what did you think was
00:05:47
effective about that I'm curious cuz I because I've heard regular people say it like when someone you're at work and
00:05:52
your boss does something and you're like they're out of their damn mind like you
00:05:55
can feel everybody feels good about talking like it doesn't feel really rude yeah it it so it sounds like in part
00:06:03
it's validating what some people are already feeling as and I think it's also at some
00:06:10
level I I don't know I don't know how far I would go with this Cara but part of me hears that language and thinks
00:06:18
okay we're tired of all of this trying to reason through and rationalize the you know the appeal of trump right how
00:06:27
many articles were written in 2016 and 2017 well actually you know it's it's not X Y
00:06:33
or Z that you hate it's it's really you know people are feeling you know that economic precarity and you know they
00:06:41
feel seen by Trump it's like no some of this is just ridiculous and unacceptable
00:06:46
let's not legitimate it right yeah so what is the what is her best quality and the one you think is problematic for her
00:06:53
possibly problem and and the same with him okay so I think her best quality right now um is momentum mhm freshh
00:07:02
energy uh I think that's that's what we're all riding on mhm uh I think her her biggest challenge is a lot of people
00:07:09
don't think they know what she stands for they're either proxying Biden's policies as hers or they're saying I I
00:07:15
don't really know what her principles are I don't know what she's going to try to implement yeah I call it comml
00:07:20
curious in a positive way that's a great way to frame it yeah um I I do think she
00:07:25
handled that really effectively in Her speech when she talked about Israel's right to exist but also how you know
00:07:32
some of the Israeli government actions in you know in Gaza were unacceptable and how Palestine has a right to
00:07:39
self-determination too I thought she walked that line very effectively in a way that frankly very few people have
00:07:44
done it was you know I I took I looked at and each sentence was strong right it was so it felt like everybody was
00:07:51
addressed but it didn't feel like she was modulating wimpy right that that's how I took it too and I I think those
00:07:59
kinds of messages will probably be helpful in the next two months I I probably wouldn't debate Trump at this
00:08:04
point I think oh well he might not he's trying yeah he it looks like he's waffling but I don't see a lot of upside
00:08:10
for her do you I do I do CU he she could get him to say something terrible like one more terrible thing I mean how how
00:08:17
many more do we need though I think she could get him to say something very terrible do you really think okay let's
00:08:23
assume she could do it yeah do you really think there's anything he could say at this point that would
00:08:30
hurt his candidacy there are several words he could say about her and about people of color yes everyone's talked
00:08:37
about him saying those words but him saying them in a public setting is a very different situation it's super ugly
00:08:43
it's like B bu Conor if if you could get him into a Bull Connor moment that would
00:08:48
be effective if he could say something terrible about women not nasty woman something worse and he's called her
00:08:56
worse names yeah you could yes there are words and you think her ability to think
00:09:01
on her feet and her prosecutor experience will allow her to De bait him in a way that other people have tried
00:09:06
and failed not so much well she's good at it that's that she has the skills certainly but I think the her very being
00:09:12
offends him I do think what was interesting to me recently is he keeps attacking walls who doesn't matter even
00:09:19
though he's totally appealing but he never attacks her like he attacks walls and I'm like oh you think you're running
00:09:25
against walls it doesn't matter like he's just an extra added cherry on the top of this happy Fest right he's not
00:09:32
like he matters but he doesn't matter kind of thing yeah I I think part of his strategy is he throws a lot of things
00:09:38
against the wall to see what sticks and walls is a new Target yeah right KLA Harris is not entirely new he's he's
00:09:45
been dealing with her over the course of the Biden presidency okay go to his negatives and positives very quickly
00:09:52
yeah well look I think one thing that he's doing effectively and it it bothers me to my core that this is effective is
00:09:57
he's continuing to delegitimate all the sources of credibility that would call into question his competence and his
00:10:03
character right so you can't trust the media they fake news it has created I think some lingering questions in the
00:10:09
minds of people who would otherwise in a different era have said you know what we
00:10:13
got to move on this guy is not qualified to lead and what about negative qualities I
00:10:19
think on the negative side beyond what we've already talked about I think he's he seems to be even more undisciplined
00:10:25
than he was before um there isn't a semblance of his strategy right now and for somebody who's as effective at
00:10:31
communicating on the fly as he is you would expect a little bit more focus and not rambling well one of the things
00:10:36
could be age and it's interesting that the media is not covering his obvious cognitive deficits now you wrote about
00:10:42
President Biden a column in New York Times back in July shortly before he stepped aside you talked about how there
00:10:47
was a group think happening with no one being honest about the reality of the situation um this is pretty common in
00:10:53
politics and business particularly with a powerful controlling leader um what how do you first of all what do you see
00:11:00
as the best way to communicate get people to see TR or reality and tell me why you decided to write that I thought
00:11:05
I was surprised and also thought it was terrific oh thank you why were you surprised uh because you don't seem to
00:11:11
go you're not a limb goer you know what I mean like I can see George Clooney doing it but although I was inspired by
00:11:16
George cloney actually I was like huh I was too this is going to cost you right like and and calling him we we gotten
00:11:23
Scott and I got in trouble for saying he should step aside a lot um so talk a little bit about why you did that and
00:11:29
what the best way to get out of group think happening I just thought it was an interesting take on what was happening
00:11:34
there all right yeah I'll start with a why so I don't think about this from a cost benefit perspective I think about
00:11:39
it more in terms of is is this an issue where I have unique expertise to bring to the table right and so I I don't
00:11:46
weigh in on a lot of politics because I don't I don't think it's a social scientist I'm adding value there but in
00:11:52
this case you know he's making a leadership decision yeah and I'm watching him first of all fall in the
00:11:57
escalation of commitment trap where he's throwing good money after bad and digging his heels in when he should be
00:12:03
doing a a cleare eyed analysis of what are my odds of winning and how much am I hurting the Congressional races down the
00:12:10
ticket which took way too long to happen in my view and so I thought okay there's
00:12:14
an analysis waiting to be done there that actually brings you know evidence from organizational psychology to the
00:12:18
table I have something to say here and nobody else is talking about it and then you know in terms of how to get out of
00:12:25
that kind of situation um I think that unfortunately what you need is you know a group of
00:12:31
people who are committed to principles larger than you know just accusing the leader so you know if I'm if I'm talking
00:12:37
to team Biden you know back in July the first conversation I'm having with them is is your goal to make Biden feel good
00:12:45
about you and solidify that relationship or is your goal for Trump to lose the election and if you focus on that latter
00:12:52
goal it becomes a lot easier to be candid right I think too many people are doing the political calculus and this is
00:12:58
what You' see in the research group think is people ask well you know is this going to help me or hurt me and
00:13:04
what you want is not a logic of consequences as Jim March first put it but a logic of appropriateness of what
00:13:10
should a person like me do in a situation like this what's the right thing to do and there's no question
00:13:14
there the right thing to do is to challenge him and get him to recognize the very real possibility that he's he's
00:13:21
basically driving a sinking ship so only one person did that very effectively Nancy Pelosi and she said it she goes my
00:13:28
goal is to defeat Trump and unfortunately our relationship is the you know the collateral damage
00:13:35
essentially you had a great conversation with Nancy Pelosi about that I think she
00:13:39
was the only person who did it effectively publicly I I heard from a bunch of people who had private conversations
00:13:46
with Biden I even got one note from somebody who said I used your article as a template for how to talk to him I said
00:13:52
you could have just called me we know each other yeah but they wouldn't have called me and I had to write to them in
00:13:59
the pages of the New York Times which was a hot moment for me but I guess you've experienced that many times many
00:14:04
times how how how do you get a leader to do that because you know here you are you finally got to the presidency after
00:14:10
all these years you do have cognitive issues right you're you're like stubborn as a personality before you were older
00:14:17
um and it only it only you know calcifies I think in people's their personalities calcify essentially yeah
00:14:24
my my impression from talking to people who were close to Biden around this was that the Legacy conversation was
00:14:30
effective that getting him to think about how he wanted to be remembered and also following the footsteps of George
00:14:35
Washington who walked away from Power um not wanting to take that third term when
00:14:40
the people around him were encouraging him to do it I think that precedent was very powerful I think you know a lot of
00:14:46
people focused on the loss message which was not effective um he did not want to
00:14:50
believe that he was not the best person to beat Trump and so reframing that is a
00:14:54
gain and and this comes right out of the evidence on how to get people to deescalate their commitment um was was
00:14:59
effective in in getting him to say okay there's actually upside here right I can
00:15:03
pass the torch I can solidify my legacy I can Elevate the Next Generation I can lift up a woman of color for a shot at
00:15:10
the presidency I think those arguments landed and that that is very much what we see outside of the Oval Office is if
00:15:16
you're going to have that kind of conversation with a leader in power um you you have to help them recognize that
00:15:22
they're compromised in their judgment that they're obviously going to be looking for information that convinces
00:15:27
them that they're going to win and discount anything that would lead them to lose so I would have gotten him to
00:15:33
pre-commit to say okay they they group of people I trust or there're a group of polls that I would be willing to trust
00:15:39
and if the polls you know hit a certain level then yes I will step aside right now that's difficult I was just reading
00:15:45
there was a excerpt from a new book about the Twitter takeover and a lot of it was about uh people who knew better
00:15:52
this was particularly around the blue roll out which wasn't going to work and a lot of us said this like come on um in
00:15:59
Al that knew that and continued tried to say it and then couldn't and there was all these people that how to cope with
00:16:05
the leader you know who was different one-on-one versus in a group where they had to feel dominant in a group some
00:16:12
situations are impossible correct that you can't because it's their you know it's their pop stand and so they're
00:16:17
going to do what they want it it is frustrating how much of this rests on the shoulders of a leader right to to
00:16:23
not only ask for dissenting views but to prove that they can handle the truth if
00:16:28
you have a leader that doesn't do that yeah I think you're going out on a limb there I think the first thing you could
00:16:33
do is you know is just say I'm worried that people are not going to be honest with you because they care a lot about
00:16:38
your approval and your opinion you know it has real weight around here can we do
00:16:42
an anonymous PLL and sometimes that's enough if the leader's open to it um I think to your point it's a lot easier to
00:16:49
have trust one-on-one than it is in a large group setting and so I would try to catch the leader before or afterward
00:16:55
U but easier said than done you know I think that that weak leaders shoot the messenger I think that strong leaders
00:17:02
praise the messenger but truly great leaders promote the messenger and I don't think we have enough leaders doing
00:17:08
that no not any actually in my experience I don't know anyway um it's a really interesting we'll see what
00:17:13
happens um I do think one of the things I I will say about KLA Harris having spent a lot of time with her is she
00:17:19
really does try to listen to a lot of opinions I I I I was always struck by that about her she'd always have me in
00:17:25
and say what's the worst thing here what's the you know very much like a lawyer would like what what can I get
00:17:31
hit with what can I and it wasn't so much political it was more like challenge me so I can make a better
00:17:36
argument it was interesting she's a really interesting that's encouraging yeah it was it was and I was always like
00:17:41
oh you're [ __ ] on that one you know and she welcomed it and she I didn't say she welcomed him but she she wasn't
00:17:46
pretending it wasn't true anyway um that's that's what good I think that's what good leaders do collect all kind
00:17:52
and then make a decision even if it's wrong

Episode Highlights

  • Kamala Harris's Campaign Momentum
    Harris's campaign has raised $540 million, energizing supporters with a message of hope.
    “The Harris campaign raised $540 million since launching last month.”
    @ 00m 08s
    August 27, 2024
  • Collective Effervescence in Politics
    The discussion highlights the power of collective joy and energy in political movements.
    “Joy is about the energy people have around a possible future.”
    @ 01m 37s
    August 27, 2024
  • Challenges of Leadership Communication
    Exploring the difficulties leaders face in accepting dissenting opinions and feedback.
    “Weak leaders shoot the messenger; strong leaders praise them.”
    @ 17m 00s
    August 27, 2024
  • The Nature of Leadership
    Good leaders gather information and make decisions, even if they might be wrong.
    “That's what good leaders do.”
    @ 17m 51s
    August 27, 2024

Episode Quotes

  • Joy is about the energy people have around a possible future.
    Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot
  • I think she has pretty definitely talked about problems right.
    Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot
  • I think you're going out on a limb there.
    Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot
  • That's what good leaders do.
    Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot
  • Even if it's wrong.
    Kamala Harris and the Democrats are Running on Joy — Is That a Winning Strategy? | Pivot

Key Moments

  • Campaign Energy00:08
  • Collective Joy01:37
  • Leadership Challenges17:00
  • Leadership Insights17:51
  • Decision-Making17:54

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown