00:00:00
There is a bit of a housing
crisis right now in America, and it is driven by a variety of
factors. One of the areas of
00:00:07
most concern is affordable
housing, and this is a problem seen quite a bit in our bigger
cities. Things like rent control
00:00:14
have led cities to rely on
lotteries in order to provide housing benefit to its citizens.
But this isn't always a good
00:00:22
thing, because it can develop a
hidden market in housing. Pleasure to be joined right now
by Judd Kessler, who's Professor
00:00:29
of Business, Economics and
Public Policy here at the Wharton School. He is also
author of the book <i>Lucky By</i>
00:00:35
<i>Design</i>, which looks at these
hidden markets. And he joins us right now. Hi, Judd, great to
catch up again.
00:00:42
Thanks so much for having me.
Happy to be here. All right, so you and I have talked about these hidden
markets, but specifically, you
00:00:48
wrote an article recently about
kind of a hidden market within the housing sector. So kind of
explain what you're seeing.
00:00:55
Yeah. So a hidden market is, as
you described, a market where there's more people who are
demanding something at the
00:01:03
prices that they're being
charged than we can reasonably serve. So economists like me
call this excess demand, more
00:01:11
people who want something than
we have available. And in these markets, we need different rules
to decide who gets access to the
00:01:18
scarce resources and who does
not, because the normal mechanism of the price goes up,
and some people decide they'll
00:01:24
buy it, and some decide that
that it's too expensive. That doesn't work when the hidden
market is setting the price too
00:01:31
low. So you mentioned this
hidden market in housing, and the dynamic that's playing out
is, in a lot of these cities,
00:01:40
mostly kind of the large
democratic cities in the country, we have for decades,
not allowed there to be as much
00:01:48
housing development as would be
necessary to meet population growth and other kind of demands
in these towns and cities. So
00:01:58
as a result, rents and property
values have been going up steadily. This is kind of
typical supply and demand,
00:02:05
right? You restrict supply,
demand goes up. Prices are going to rise. And so as a— as a
consequence, or as a kind of
00:02:11
reaction to that, affordable
housing, housing that is set up so that tenants only have to pay
a fraction of their income— so
00:02:22
it's— typically 30% is the kind
of maximum that you can ask a potential tenant to pay. There
are developments that are set up
00:02:31
or sets of units within
developments that will be offered for— as affordable
housing for folks who won't have
00:02:40
to pay market rate rents. So
will pay below-market rate rents, to the level that they can
afford. Now the issue with that
00:02:48
is, of course, there are many
more people who want to have an affordable unit, because the
affordable units are much
00:02:53
cheaper than the market rate
units. And that is what creates the hidden market. Because now
you're going to have thousands of
00:03:01
people who might want to live in
the same unit because they would only have to pay, you know, a
few $1,000 a month, instead of
00:03:07
what might be twice that if they
got it on— outside of the affordable housing system.
- Right.
00:03:13
And no matter what, when you
have the component of lower cost versus supply, lower cost is
always going to win out, isn't it?
00:03:21
If you are offering something at
a below market price, so at a discount, and you're always
going to get more people who
00:03:29
want to buy the thing than there
are available. That's kind of by definition. That's what it means
to be offering at a below-market
00:03:35
price. And so that's what you
see in, you know, live event tickets, when ticket prices are
very low relative to what you
00:03:42
could get away for charging. Or
a lot of people want to get into a hot restaurant, and they're
giving away the reservations for
00:03:49
free, right? These are all
situations where you have a below market price. You're going
to get a ton of people who want
00:03:56
to be the ones to clean it. So then, in these cities, they
have lotteries to try and help
00:04:02
determine who gets these lower-
cost living spaces. What kind of impact is the lottery having on
kind of the— you know, the
00:04:13
general scope of real estate in
some of these cities? Yeah. So, you know,
there's lots of ways that you
00:04:19
could try to allocate these
limited set of scarce resources to the many, many people who
want to live there. So
00:04:27
lotteries are not the only way,
although they're becoming more and more common, I think because
the other ways have been
00:04:32
revealed to have their own
problems. So often, cities will do things like long waiting
lists. Like, I sign up to— say I
00:04:39
would like to get a spot in a
subsidized apartment or in public housing. But those
waiting lists in some cities
00:04:45
stretch decades. Like, you sign
up now in the hopes that 25 years from now, you'll get a
apartment in Chicago public
00:04:52
housing. And that obviously is
going to be untenable for lots of families. So the lottery is
a potentially— I mean, it's a
00:05:03
fair kind of potential solution
to this, where the way that it works is, a new development is
getting built. The development—
00:05:10
the city is going to require it
to have a certain fraction of its units be affordable, so be
kind of rented in this
00:05:17
particular way, at below market
prices. And typically, they'll get some kind of tax credit, or
the ability to kind of build
00:05:24
more units than they would
otherwise, if they consent to this affordable housing,
building some affordable housing.
00:05:32
And then, so that the units can
be rented immediately by people who need them, they will put
them into a lottery, and the
00:05:42
lotteries will have hundreds of
people applying for each unit. So in the last full year of data
that I saw in New York
00:05:50
City, there were 10,000 units
that became available in these lotteries, and there were 6
million entries in those
00:05:57
lotteries. So in any given— for
any given unit, if you enter the lottery, you have a one in 600
chance of winning. Now, of
00:06:04
course, the right strategy for
you as a market participant is just, like, enter into every
lottery that you have a chance
00:06:11
of winning, because that's just
kind of more draws. More draws, more bites of the apple, so to
speak. But of course, not every
00:06:19
housing unit is your ideal unit.
So you often end up entering in lotteries that are
for places that you would be
00:06:27
happy to live at the very cheap
rate, but not your ideal place to live, not necessarily your—
even your ideal neighborhood.
00:06:33
That was going to be my next
question. Because, you know, you're dealing with the
component of where these
00:06:39
properties are. And it may or
may not be a place that you would want to move to in the
first place.
00:06:44
And this is one of the problems
with using these lottery systems. At least as they're
designed, where I enter a
00:06:50
lottery for each housing
development, one at a time in a serial fashion.
Because say you and I both want
00:06:59
affordable housing. Say you want
to live in neighborhood A, I want to live in neighborhood B,
those are our first choices. But
00:07:04
of course, we'd be happy to live
anywhere if we could get below- market rates. We could end up
winning the— entering, you
00:07:11
know, all the lotteries, winning
in the other person's favorite lottery. So I get a spot in your
favorite neighborhood. You get a
00:07:17
spot in my favorite
neighborhood. There's no mechanism for us to swap our
wins, right? I just happened to
00:07:22
get lucky in the lottery that
you cared more about. So one of the things I talk about in the
article is, look, if this is
00:07:28
where we're going to be, we're
going to be in a world where we're going to be doing
allocations of these affordable
00:07:35
housing units by lottery. Let's
at least try to solve this low- hanging fruit of kind of, how
can we at least give people some
00:07:44
way of signaling what their
preferred lotteries are, so we don't end up in these situations
where people are kind of winning
00:07:52
a lottery and then stuck in that
housing development, because there's no easy way to swap out.
And if you're saving a few
00:07:59
thousand dollars a month on rent, you
know, you're going to feel tied to that particular unit. You
know, maybe we could design
00:08:06
these lotteries better so we
don't have these problems. Well, and it sounds like it's a little
bit like what we're seeing going
00:08:11
through right now with interest
rates, in that if you've got a low mortgage rate, why would you
want to move if you got a three
00:08:17
and a half percent mortgage
rate, to potentially get one that's six, six and a half percent?
So the people that get
00:08:23
into these rent-controlled
buildings, the last thing they want to do is move, even if it
is maybe not the best location.
00:08:30
Yeah. So— and it's— it's a
very similar phenomenon of, you know, kind of— we call it
golden handcuffs, right? Even
00:08:37
though we're— these are— these
are units that you're in where you're saving thousands of dollars a
month, the same way that if your
00:08:44
interest rate is three and a
half percent on your mortgage, you might be saving, you know, a
substantial sum versus six and a
00:08:49
half percent. And yeah, if—
in this situation, where it's the city deciding who gets— you
know, how the lotteries are run,
00:09:00
the city can make improvements.
They could say, "All right, we're going to not have people enter
lottery by lottery by lottery,
00:09:06
but we're going to— you know,
every three months, we're going to take all of the developments
that are going to be lottery
00:09:11
units, and we're going to let
you enter simultaneously in all of them, and we're going to let
you rank which ones you want
00:09:19
more than others. And that's
not— you know, in New York City, we— families are familiar with
that kind of system because we
00:09:25
do it for getting our kids into
a public school in New York. So in the next couple of weeks,
people who want to send their
00:09:31
kids to kindergarten in New York
City public schools are going to rank kindergarten programs.
My first favorite program,
00:09:36
second favorite program. So
these systems are straightforward to design and
explain to folks, and at least
00:09:44
then we could make sure that,
you know, if I'm going to be stuck with golden handcuffs
somewhere, it was the place that
00:09:50
I wanted to be, not, you know
three— three neighborhoods over, and, you know, where my commute is
much longer to work.
00:09:56
Judd, great to talk with you.
Thanks very much for your time. And again, all the luck with the
book.
00:10:00
Thanks so much for having me. Thank you. I said that
intentionally. <i>Lucky By Design</i> is
00:10:05
the name of the book. Judd
Kessler, Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy here
at the Wharton School.