
This episode covers decision making, gender diversity in hiring, the isolated choice effect, toucanism in corporate boards, and the effectiveness of diversity training.
The guest discusses the isolated choice effect, which shows that women are hired more frequently when hiring decisions are made in groups rather than individually. This research highlights the importance of context in decision-making processes.
Additionally, the concept of toucanism is introduced, where organizations tend to stop efforts for diversity after achieving a certain number of women on boards, specifically two. This phenomenon raises concerns about the commitment to ongoing diversity efforts.
The guest also evaluates the impact of diversity training in organizations, revealing that the outcomes are often disappointing and that such training may not significantly improve conditions for women in the workplace.
Research shows group hiring improves women's outcomes, but diversity training is often ineffective.

Diversity training is likely to be a terribly useful way to improve outcomes.Women & Work: Does Diversity Training Work? | Katy Milkman — Ripple Effect Podcast