Search Captions & Ask AI

Basel III, CFPB, and the Future of U.S. Financial Regulation

April 20, 2025 / 09:15

This episode features David Zaring, a Professor of Legal Studies and Business Ethics at the Wharton School, discussing the potential changes in financial regulations under different administrations, particularly focusing on the banking sector.

Zaring highlights the differences between the Biden and Trump administrations regarding financial regulation, noting that while the Biden administration struggled to implement a new capital rule, the Trump administration may pursue the Basel III Endgame rule.

The conversation touches on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Trump administration's approach to reputational risk in banking, suggesting a shift in how agencies operate rather than the regulations themselves.

Zaring reflects on the effectiveness of the Dodd-Frank reforms post-financial crisis, indicating that the banking system performed well during the pandemic, which may influence future regulatory approaches.

Finally, Zaring discusses the global implications of the Basel III Capital Accords and the importance of U.S. decisions on international banking standards, particularly concerning mid-sized regional banks.

TLDR

David Zaring discusses potential changes in U.S. banking regulations under different administrations and the implications of Basel III.

Episode

9:15
00:00:00
Dan Loney: One expectation as the Trump administration took office was that the regulatory landscape might see some significant
00:00:07
change, and that still could be some of the case with some of the potential impacts playing out. But will the regulations
00:00:15
themselves change, especially in and around the banking sector? Pleasure should be joined right now by David Zaring, who is
00:00:21
Professor of Legal Studies and Business Ethics here at the Wharton School. Hi, David, great to talk to you again. David Zaring: It's great
00:00:27
to be here, Dan. - All right, so as the election played out and you're thinking about the landscape of regulation, what
00:00:37
were your thoughts about what we potentially could see us with some of the rhetoric that had been put out
00:00:45
there? - Yeah, I thought there could be some real differences between sort of second Biden term and Trump administration term. Maybe
00:00:55
not as many in financial regulation as you might see in other places. The Biden administration had tried very
00:01:03
hard to get a new capital rule across the finish line, and they eventually failed to do that. So I assumed they were going to
00:01:12
come back with something. But the Trump administration has also said, or at least Chairman Powell has said, that the Fed
00:01:19
wants to do a Basel III Endgame rule. That's the rule that the Biden administration couldn't get done. And so we'll
00:01:27
see if that happens. But in some ways, I think financial regulation may well be different. I think there's a
00:01:35
concern that there's too burdensome set of sort of oversight on normal banks, and that's going to change maybe.
00:01:47
There will be some tailoring of rules to make it more modest. The CFPB is obviously going to be completely different over the
00:01:54
course between the Biden administration the Trump administration. That's the Consumer Financial Protection
00:02:00
Bureau, which the Trump administration looks like they kind of want to shut down. And then, I think, has a really
00:02:05
different approach to crypto. - So is it not necessarily then the regulations themselves, but
00:02:13
how maybe the agencies would work? You mentioned the CFPB. There's talk about, you know, maybe some changes and different
00:02:21
approach there. There's talk about maybe cutting regulators from the Treasury Department. So it might not necessarily be the
00:02:28
regulations, but how these agencies work. - Yeah, I think that will be something -- excuse me. And one of
00:02:37
the things that you have seen, and I wonder if this will change a little bit, but banks used to be worried that their
00:02:47
supervisors would sanction them on the basis of reputational risk, and that is the risk that you're sort of doing business
00:02:55
with some unsavory or maybe unsound clients. That's going to be bad for your reputation. And banks complained a lot during
00:03:04
the Biden administration that they were being sort of encouraged to de-bank crypto firms and to maybe consider
00:03:12
getting out of energy lending because of reputational risk. You don't want to be seen as somebody who's opposed to, you
00:03:20
know, caring about the planet, that kind of thing. And the Trump administration is completely getting rid of
00:03:26
reputational risk as something supervisors can consider. But the way they did it is kind of interesting, because they just
00:03:35
sent out a memo to all their supervisors and told them to stop considering reputational risk. So the problem there is
00:03:42
in the next, you know, Elizabeth Warren, or whatever administration, she can just rescind that memo and put
00:03:49
back another memo. And so that's a difference where, you know, personnel is all that matters, but personnel
00:03:55
doesn't always change regulation for forever. And so I sort of wonder if they'll think about doing a rule making on stuff
00:04:02
like reputational risk, which would be more permanent. - Does this, to a degree, though, show how much the focus around the
00:04:11
banking sector in the wake of the financial crisis, you know, the changes that were made were really even maybe more
00:04:19
substantive than we gave them credit for? - Yeah, I think there was some sense that, you know, the
00:04:27
Dodd Frank and the Obama administration, after the financial crisis, didn't do enough to reform a financial
00:04:37
system that had really gone awry. And I thought that the pandemic suggested that maybe the Obama administration had
00:04:46
done a pretty good job there. The banking system really sailed through that crisis with flying colors. And you know, it was not
00:04:54
an easy crisis for other sectors of the economy by any stretch of the imagination. So that is, you know,
00:05:04
a reform that maybe worked out fine. And now the question is, as the financial crisis gets further and further in the rear
00:05:13
view mirror, you know, banks are going to complain, "We're being over regulated. You know, when we finalize this Basel III
00:05:21
Capital rule, you're departing too much from the minimum standards that is really where we should be to
00:05:28
create a level playing field at the global level, and not, you know, gold plate there." And I
00:05:36
think that we're seeing a current administration that looks like it's going to be receptive to some of those
00:05:41
complaints. And so there, you may not just see difference in personnel and policy of the
00:05:48
administration, but some sort of more longer term efforts to ease that regulatory burden. - Well
00:05:54
take a moment and talk for a second about Basel III and the potential impact that it could have, because we talk so much
00:06:00
about, you know, the banking sector in the US, but there are certainly been instances we've seen play out in the last few
00:06:06
years of banks overseas and in Europe specifically, that have had their issues and have kind of gone awry of the rules.
00:06:15
- Yeah, yeah. No, I think it's fair to say that, you know, American regulators kind of take the position that European
00:06:25
banks are systematically under capitalized, and that doesn't matter for all of them, but that does mean that some of them are
00:06:33
not sort of resilient to a bunch of crises which have proven to be problematic for the European Union where the economy isn't so
00:06:42
great, and so the banking sector is finding that lending is difficult and asset valuations are hard to improve upon. And
00:06:52
then in addition, you had this effort to sort of finalize the Basel III Capital Accords to make sure that everybody was
00:07:01
well capitalized. And that sort of hit a pause right now, because the United States can't figure out exactly what it wants
00:07:09
to do. And so the European Union said, "Okay, well, we'll wait to see what happens in America, and depending on what they do,
00:07:16
that'll affect what we do." And the same thing goes for the United Kingdom as well. So, you know, we had this sort of global
00:07:22
agreement that was supposed to create uniform standards for banks, and it's largely done that. But the most recent effort
00:07:30
to, you know, improve upon those standards is really kind of in turnaround while everybody waits to see what, if anything, the
00:07:38
United States does. - Well, then I'll wrap it up with this. What are you most watchful on then right now, in terms of
00:07:46
how the landscape could potentially be adjusted in the months ahead? - I will be interested in seeing if the US is serious about
00:07:57
finalizing its Basel III obligations. I'll kind of be interested in knowing, once it does that, what's it think about
00:08:04
these mid-sized regional banks? There's a ton of them in Europe, and there were some in the United States. And there was a
00:08:09
blip in 2023 that really affected those regional banks. And so one of the things that the Biden administration's
00:08:16
proposal wanted to do was bring them into the toughest aspect of Basel III. And I think it's a very open question as to whether
00:08:27
the next administration, the current administration, will continue that effort. So I'll be interested to see, does Basel
00:08:34
happen? If it does, what happens to those mid-sized banks in the United States? And then I'll be looking at sort of gobbledygook
00:08:40
stuff like the supplemental leverage ratio and whether that continues to be applied or exempts treasury bills. Banks
00:08:48
care a lot about this, and hopefully your listeners do too. - Yeah, absolutely. Hey, David, always great to chat. Thanks
00:08:54
very much for your time today. All the best. - Yeah, happy to do it. - You got it. David Zaring, Professor of Legal Studies and
00:08:59
Business Ethics here at the Wharton School.

Episode Highlights

  • Basel III Endgame Rule
    The Trump administration aims to implement a Basel III Endgame rule, a significant shift in financial regulation.
    “The Trump administration wants to do a Basel III Endgame rule.”
    @ 01m 14s
    April 20, 2025
  • Reputational Risk in Banking
    The Trump administration is eliminating reputational risk considerations for bank supervisors, changing the regulatory landscape.
    “Banks complained they were encouraged to de-bank crypto firms.”
    @ 03m 06s
    April 20, 2025
  • Impact of Dodd-Frank
    The Dodd-Frank reforms may have been more effective than previously thought, as the banking system thrived during the pandemic.
    “The banking system sailed through the crisis with flying colors.”
    @ 04m 50s
    April 20, 2025
  • Future of Mid-Sized Banks
    The future of mid-sized regional banks hangs in the balance as Basel III obligations are considered.
    “What happens to mid-sized banks in the U.S.?”
    @ 08m 34s
    April 20, 2025

Episode Quotes

  • The Trump administration wants to do a Basel III Endgame rule.
    Basel III, CFPB, and the Future of U.S. Financial Regulation
  • Banks complained they were encouraged to de-bank crypto firms.
    Basel III, CFPB, and the Future of U.S. Financial Regulation
  • The banking system sailed through the crisis with flying colors.
    Basel III, CFPB, and the Future of U.S. Financial Regulation
  • Are we being over-regulated?
    Basel III, CFPB, and the Future of U.S. Financial Regulation
  • What happens to mid-sized banks in the U.S.?
    Basel III, CFPB, and the Future of U.S. Financial Regulation

Key Moments

  • Reputational Risk Changes03:26
  • Basel III Discussion05:54
  • Mid-Sized Banks Concern08:34

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown