00:00:00
We are seeing the impact of the
benefits of federal subsidies with the Affordable Care Act,
because we have also seen 1.5
00:00:08
million people quit their health
care plans through the ACA in 2026. This all because the
subsidies were held up by
00:00:16
members of Congress. That number
also expected to rise due to the rising costs of health care. It
shows just how important a
00:00:24
financial component from the
federal government is to this program. So what is the future
for the ACA and what should we
00:00:32
be thinking of an idea brought
forward by President Trump of providing funds but letting
people go pick the plan that
00:00:39
they want? Pleasure to be joined
by Mark Pauly, who is Professor Emeritus of Healthcare
Management here at the Wharton
00:00:45
School. Mark, great to have you
back again. Thank you for your time.
- Thanks, Dan.
00:00:49
Obviously seeing people
drop their plans en masse, this was kind of
expected, especially if Congress
00:00:57
was not going to be able to come
to some sort of resolution on the— on the benefits.
00:01:02
What's happened already is that
the subsidies that were increased during the period of
COVID have snapped back to their
00:01:10
original design from 2014. And
that has caused an estimated— well, we don't know yet, because
the official sign-up period
00:01:22
ends January 15, today. But the
early returns suggest that when the dust clears, maybe up
to 7 million people out of the
00:01:36
24 million or so, 21 million
people who are buying insurance through the exchanges, they'll
drop off of exchange coverage.
00:01:44
There is a silver lining,
though. Many of the— those who drop exchange coverage because
it now becomes more expensive
00:01:53
with a smaller subsidy, will go
back onto employment-based coverage. Say, pick up a
spouse's coverage or go to
00:02:03
unsubsidized coverage,
individual coverage off the exchange. So at least the smart
money says that the net net
00:02:10
impact on the number of people
who are uninsured is going to be on the order of 2 million
people. That's millions of
00:02:16
Americans, of course, but that's
less than 1% of the total population. So the sky's not
falling here, although, if you
00:02:25
remove any subsidy program,
whether it was reasonable or unreasonable, the people who are
getting the subsidy are going to
00:02:31
suffer when the subsidy is taken
away. Doesn't this, though, also
highlight, again, something that
00:02:37
I think you and I have talked
about in the past, is, just the general need to focus on
healthcare costs and look at
00:02:43
what needs to be done in the
future, if anything can be done, to make it more affordable for
the public, en masse?
00:02:55
Well, yes and no. I mean,
most of what the consternation surrounding the ending of the
enhanced Affordable Care Act
00:03:05
subsidies is because of the
subsidy. And of course, if your premiums are, for example—
I actually looked these numbers
00:03:15
up. A 50-year-old would
have, under the enhanced subsidy, been paying only 7% of
the total premium, and when the
00:03:23
subsidy snaps back to the old
level, that goes up to 19%. That more than doubles their premium.
So they get a big kick in the
00:03:31
head. But on the other hand,
the amount of subsidy that's being provided by the rest of us
isn't really reduced all that
00:03:42
much. So mostly it's the subsidy
removal that's causing the consternation here. If you look
at, to get a more reasonable
00:03:53
picture, what's happening to
insurance coverage for people who get private insurance the
way most people get private
00:04:00
insurance, which is through
their job, that premium is going up maybe five to 7%.
Somewhat higher than average.
00:04:09
And, you know— and it's not a
good thing unless you're getting something for the money. But it's
not near the doubling
00:04:17
and tripling that CNN will
tell you about that you should be concerned about. Of
course, you know, frankly, I'm
00:04:26
on Medicare, so this doesn't
matter to me, personally. Other than that I'm such a soft-
hearted person.
00:04:32
So the idea being presented by
President Trump of allowing the public to try and, you know,
receive funds and go get their
00:04:40
own healthcare, is that one that
is a viable option in your mind? Well, it's probably viable in
the sense that if it happened,
00:04:48
it would happen. My guess is,
depending on the rules— now, the rules in different bills
are different. But depending on
00:04:56
the rules, I would expect and
would hope that most people would take that money and
go buy the insurance they would
00:05:03
have bought anyway. Maybe a
little more affordable now, because they are getting the
government subsidy. The
00:05:16
alternative strategy of saying,
"Well, I'll just put the money under my mattress and use it if
I get sick." Well, that's okay,
00:05:24
as long as you don't get too
sick. But if you have a six-figure bill, you're not going to get a
big enough subsidy to cover
00:05:31
that, so you'll be exposed to
financial risk. So I would advise people to take their
subsidy money, if they call me,
00:05:38
and go buy whatever insurance,
with their enhanced income, they think they most prefer. The sort
of mirror image that some people
00:05:52
are talking about that could be
linked with the cash subsidy from lump sum subsidy is either
a health savings account or a
00:06:03
much more limited coverage plan
that people might be able to buy as short term insurance. But
they could renew that year after
00:06:13
year. That seems to be much less
expensive insurance in terms of its premium than even the bronze
plans. But again, you don't get
00:06:23
something for nothing. That
limited coverage insurance is limited coverage, and it exposes
you to a fair amount of out of
00:06:29
pocket risk if you get really
sick. What do you think, then, has
been the role that the ACA has
00:06:36
played in our healthcare system
over the last several years? Well, I think the main positive
one, of course, is dramatic drop
00:06:44
in the fraction of the
population that's uninsured. Most of that drop occurred in
the first round of the ACA. The
00:06:50
enhanced subsidies pushed the
percentage uninsured down a couple or three percentage
points more to an all time
00:06:59
low. But we're getting into the
range of diminishing returns, where there are what I call the
Evil Knievels of health
00:07:07
insurance, people who think that
they will never get sick and won't buy insurance unless you
make them buy it. And even if
00:07:14
it's free, you have to make them
sign up for it. But so— but— but— so that's, I mean, putting
in a plug here. That's why
00:07:24
I favor a mandate that says, if
you don't buy insurance, we're going to buy some insurance,
some bare bones insurance for
00:07:31
you. And if you want, you can—
you will have to pay something for that, but it's— so it'd be
like a tax. But— and then if you
00:07:40
want, you can top up that
coverage. But that idea of pairing a health savings account
or a deposit type of subsidy
00:07:53
with less generous, more
catastrophic coverage, it's an old idea, actually an old
Republican idea. It's been
00:08:01
around for a long time. That
seems to be what the President has in mind, although we don't
know what the President really
00:08:06
has in mind. Nor does he always. No, that's true. Yes. Mark,
great to talk to you. Thanks
00:08:12
very much for your time today.
All the best. All right, thanks, Dan. You got it. Mark Pauly, who
is a Professor Emeritus of
00:08:19
Healthcare Management here at
the Wharton School.