Search Captions & Ask AI

Jeremy Siegel: Supreme Court’s Tariff Decision and Its Market Implications

February 27, 2026 / 08:55

This episode covers tariffs, market impacts, and economic forecasts with guest Jeremy Seagull, a finance professor and senior economist.

Jeremy Seagull discusses the recent tariff decisions made by the Scotas administration, including the increase to 15% and implications for markets and the economy. He notes that while there may be some uncertainty, the final outcomes may not differ significantly from previous negotiations.

The conversation shifts to the current state of the economy, highlighting the resilience of the Dow and S&P indices despite global events. Seagull emphasizes the importance of upcoming developments in Iran and their potential impact on oil prices.

Seagull also shares his thoughts on Kevin Worsh, the next potential Fed chair, and the possibility of further cuts to the Fed funds rate depending on labor market data. He expresses optimism about the market's performance in 2026.

Throughout the discussion, Seagull provides a detailed analysis of economic indicators and the potential for future market movements, emphasizing the importance of data dependency in economic policy.

TLDR

Jeremy Seagull discusses tariffs, market resilience, and economic forecasts, focusing on the impact of upcoming events in Iran and Fed decisions.

Episode

8:55
00:00:00
And as always, great to spend some time every month with Wharton ameritus professor of finance Jeremy Seagull,
00:00:06
who's also a senior economist at Wisdomree. Jeremy, obviously lots to discuss since we last talked. I guess
00:00:13
let's start with the Scotas's decision on tariffs and obviously the potential
00:00:17
impact that it's going to have uh on the markets, on the economy and such. Give
00:00:21
us your thoughts. >> Yeah. Wow. Um, I mean, we we we knew it the the prediction market said it was
00:00:32
going to be NYX, but we didn't quite know how. Um, so, uh, let let's say
00:00:39
where we stand. Um, obviously what he has gone to is section 122, which he first said was going to put a 10% and
00:00:48
then he he realized that the max was 15, so why not go to 15, >> right? % which then he went to on
00:00:56
Saturday. Um that does lower uh um the average a couple of points from what it was under the AIPA tariffs. Um uh
00:01:09
particularly from China and several other Asian countries. Of course, it raises it on several like uh the UK
00:01:16
which negotiated a 10% raise. Um uh uh remember Trump likes to go in with a big stick and and then go down from there.
00:01:27
>> Um so now his at least by using that his his big stick isn't quite as big.
00:01:34
However, he has lots of other powers. I mean he has powers to dequery embargos on certain uh um uh goods. He has a
00:01:43
number of other authorities that he can use. One of the scariest authorities you
00:01:48
can use is the section 338 that goes from the smooth holoy tariff of of of um of of 1932 which of course was one of
00:01:58
the most damaging tariffs we've had that allows up to 50% with no uh requirement
00:02:04
of federal agency and no limit on duration. Now that would be extreme. Yeah. But he has that in a back pocket
00:02:10
if he wants to use something like a hammer >> uh to do that. Um, let let's let's talk
00:02:18
about what the consequences are likely to be. I I don't think the final tariffs are going to be all that much
00:02:25
different from what they would negotiated. Uh, I know there's some I think the ones
00:02:30
that haven't negotiated will go through. Um, he can still, as I say, say, "Hey,
00:02:36
listen, I have other powers that can be much more than 15% if I want to use them." and and therefore I think he's
00:02:43
going to proceed along those same lines. A um a big question mark of course is the um uh the refunds which was uh
00:02:54
unfortunately not specified by the Supreme Court and by the way this decision should have come 6 months ago.
00:03:01
I mean there was no there was no evidence they had to find a search for anything like that. I mean it was right
00:03:06
in the text to begin with and we would have avoided a lot of hardship and and mess as uh uh Justice Kavanaaugh in fact
00:03:16
used that very word. So there's a whole question of the refunds um that could be
00:03:21
litigated for months if not years. Um so there's more uncertainty because we you
00:03:28
know exactly what rates are going to be and how are things has been put a monkey
00:03:32
wrench. However, I don't think the final outcome is going to be all that much
00:03:36
different. >> And um uh I think the economy actually looks fairly good looking forward.
00:03:44
>> Yeah. And and since the last time we talked to you, the Dow has crossed
00:03:48
50,000. Uh the S&P I think dipped across 7,000 in an intraday and then headed
00:03:54
back. uh the the markets have been fairly resilient to all of the stuff that has gone on out there whether it be
00:04:03
the tariff impact or you know some of the global events that have gone on as well.
00:04:09
>> Yeah. I mean the big event coming up I think is Iran obviously and how he's
00:04:14
going to act on that. That's the next I think really significant thing that affects oil and a lot of others. We
00:04:20
don't know what he's going to do and how he's ne negotiate that. one of the the
00:04:24
speed bumps uh as we know Kevin Worsh being appointed is a favorable sign. So uh you know uh and the government
00:04:33
shutdown was avoided in Maine but there's still TSA uh you know and flights uh that could be disrupted if
00:04:42
this go on for several months but that is sort of in the background. The government is uh funded outside of
00:04:48
Homeland Security all the way till September 30th. So that's more on the back burner. I would say the Iran thing
00:04:55
is the big thing coming up. Uh I wish I could predict what's going to happen,
00:05:00
but I cannot. Um I think the tariff thing is is really going to fade into something that is is not going to be
00:05:08
that much different uh than um what the levels we would have seen under AIPA. >> Since you mentioned Kevin Worsh, let me
00:05:18
ask you your thoughts on Mr. Worsh the next Fed chair, assuming that you know the that his nomination goes through in
00:05:26
Congress. Um I like him. I liked him as among the four choices. I thought he was the best.
00:05:37
So I was pleased that Kevin Worsh I mean he's a man that's been on the Fed for
00:05:42
quite a number of years during the financial crisis under Bernani. Um he he's he's a smart guy. uh how he won't
00:05:51
take over the meeting until the June meeting uh which is quite a bit from now when we're going to have you know
00:05:56
there's so much that can happen between now and then uh we we don't know how we
00:06:01
how we going to react. Uh I I will stick with my feeling that I had I think in the in the last month. I still think we
00:06:08
have a ways to go down on um the uh uh Fed funds rate. I would like to see two more cuts. I'd like to see the Fed fund
00:06:17
rate in the low 3s. right and going forward. Um but if whether it's done, you know, next meeting or two or three
00:06:27
meetings from now is is not that significant. Well, and and interesting you mentioned that because there were
00:06:33
comments by Christopher Waller uh earlier today as we taped this on a Monday. Um that uh he can see that if
00:06:41
there is some some issues with the labor data the next you know couple of times we get reports uh that he could see uh
00:06:49
you know the Fed going to a move to a cut. So it seems like >> Oh absolutely. I mean it is it's
00:06:55
completely data dependent. But if we see some weak data now we see some weak labor market data which we have not so
00:07:01
far. >> Yeah >> we have not seen weak neighbor labor market data. I mean those those jobless
00:07:08
claims are remaining in there. Um you know ob we we think the equilibrium amount of monthly payroll gains is
00:07:15
somewhere in the neighborhood of 40 50,000. we've been in that area, but it could deteriorate certainly uh you know
00:07:22
uh and and if it does deteriorate there would be no question that there would be
00:07:27
a cut. Um but I think they're holding firm if we t see the type of labor market data that we have actually seen
00:07:35
over the last 3 months. >> So obviously Iran is the top thing on your on your radar right now. Anything
00:07:40
else that is really drawing your attention as well? Yeah, I think I I think I think Iran is
00:07:47
is is definitely the big thing. I mean, there's going to be a lot of churning
00:07:52
and little bit more uncertainty as a result of of these terrorists, but I would not, you know, I I would use that
00:08:00
uncertainty I think is is a buying condition. I think that I think the market is still going to go up here in
00:08:05
2026 because I don't think the final outcome of the tariff, in fact, I think
00:08:10
it's welcome that there was a limit put on the president. and he can't just
00:08:13
throw around any rate that he wants. Again, in his back pocket, he has a few nuclear options here with this Mudhalli
00:08:19
tariff and embargos that he uh could use as a big stick, but at this particular point, doesn't look like he is uh uh
00:08:28
wanting to use those. >> Jeremy, always great to catch up. Thank you very much, sir.
00:08:34
>> Thank you very much, Dan. >> You got it. Jeremy Seagull, who is professor emeritus of finance here at
00:08:39
the Wharton School and senior economist at Wisdom Tree.

Episode Highlights

  • Impact of Tariffs on Markets
    Jeremy discusses the potential impact of tariff decisions on the economy and markets.
    “I don’t think the final tariffs are going to be all that much different from what they would have negotiated.”
    @ 02m 24s
    February 27, 2026
  • Iran's Influence on Oil Prices
    The conversation shifts to the upcoming events in Iran and their implications for oil prices.
    “The big event coming up I think is Iran obviously and how he’s going to act on that.”
    @ 04m 11s
    February 27, 2026
  • Kevin Worsh's Fed Chair Nomination
    Jeremy shares his thoughts on Kevin Worsh as the next Fed chair.
    “I like him. I liked him as among the four choices.”
    @ 05m 18s
    February 27, 2026

Episode Quotes

  • Wow. Um, I mean, we we we knew it.
    Jeremy Siegel: Supreme Court’s Tariff Decision and Its Market Implications
  • He has a few nuclear options here with this Mudhalli tariff.
    Jeremy Siegel: Supreme Court’s Tariff Decision and Its Market Implications

Key Moments

  • Discussion on Tariffs00:13
  • Market Predictions03:41
  • Iran's Impact04:55
  • Fed Chair Nomination05:18

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown