Search Captions & Ask AI

Adams Karen SF

February 25, 2016 / 06:58

This episode features a discussion on security studies, forecasting, and the Good Judgment Project with a focus on international relations and the rise of China.

The guest shares their background in security studies and how it relates to forecasting vulnerabilities and strategies. They highlight their familiarity with trade and national security issues.

Key discussions include the application of structural realist theory and the importance of understanding biases in making predictions. The guest emphasizes the significance of focusing on questions within their area of strength.

The guest also discusses the benefits of anonymous forecasting, which built their confidence in making predictions without the fear of reputational impact. They explain how this experience has influenced their work on an article about China's rise.

Overall, the conversation illustrates how participation in the Good Judgment Project has dramatically changed the guest's perspective on international relations and their approach to forecasting.

TL;DR

The guest discusses forecasting in security studies and how the Good Judgment Project influenced their views on China's rise in international relations.

Episode

6:58
00:00:08
well in my work on security a big part
00:00:12
of the question is whose security might
00:00:16
be in danger in the coming years so
00:00:19
secure this field of security studies
00:00:21
inherently is about forecasting making
00:00:24
predictions about how actors might be
00:00:26
vulnerable what strategies might help
00:00:28
them and so forth so I got interested in
00:00:31
the good judgment project because I
00:00:32
wanted to build these skills
00:00:37
well I think there were a couple of
00:00:39
factors one was that I am in the middle
00:00:42
of my career now and I've spent a lot of
00:00:43
time studying exactly the kind of issues
00:00:46
that the good judgment project was
00:00:47
focusing on and so I was familiar with
00:00:51
trade issues I was familiar with
00:00:54
national security issues the rise and
00:00:57
fall of governments that kind of thing
00:00:59
so it really was right in my issue area
00:01:01
also I I use a theory that can be well
00:01:07
applied in this kind of situation it's
00:01:09
called structural realist theory and it
00:01:12
gives a sense of big recurring outcomes
00:01:17
and international relations the rise and
00:01:19
fall of great powers the tendency for
00:01:22
military conflict to occur competition
00:01:26
and trade and so forth and so I had a
00:01:28
kind of broad understanding of
00:01:30
International Affairs that I could apply
00:01:33
to particular situations and the beauty
00:01:35
of this theory was that it was it's
00:01:37
really pretty open states have a lot of
00:01:39
choices about how they act and so I
00:01:44
wasn't falling into the trap of thinking
00:01:46
that something was inevitable but
00:01:48
instead was investigating which things
00:01:51
were more likely which things were less
00:01:52
likely so this theory was really
00:01:55
conducive to probabilistic forecasting
00:01:57
and my background knowledge was really
00:02:00
helpful in having a big set of
00:02:02
information to draw from and also
00:02:05
knowledge about where to find things
00:02:07
where to find information that would be
00:02:09
helpful
00:02:13
well the first thing was to really
00:02:16
explore my biases to realize that I
00:02:20
often would have a first impulse about a
00:02:22
question and I didn't want to just go
00:02:25
with that sometimes it was right but I
00:02:27
didn't want to just go on impulse and
00:02:30
secondly I really learned to think about
00:02:35
what my strengths were to focus on
00:02:37
questions that I thought were in my area
00:02:39
of strength and in particular to focus
00:02:42
on questions that I thought were were
00:02:45
being answered wrong or you know where
00:02:47
the the general consensus was different
00:02:50
from what I thought it was because there
00:02:53
I could make the most difference in
00:02:55
shifting opinion or contributing
00:02:57
knowledge that might sway the crowd and
00:02:59
make the group as a whole more accurate
00:03:01
so I think those things are really
00:03:04
important
00:03:08
well every year in the tournament I kept
00:03:11
a running list of what questions I'd
00:03:13
answered when i first answered them how
00:03:16
i first answered them and it was really
00:03:18
helpful to see how my opinion changed
00:03:21
his new information came along so I was
00:03:23
all kind of keeping myself honest about
00:03:25
what was my original opinion and what
00:03:27
was making me change my mind and I think
00:03:30
that was really helpful because I
00:03:32
learned a lot about what kind of pits I
00:03:34
might fall into you know if I get over
00:03:37
optimistic about suddenly there's a lot
00:03:38
of news on a certain issue I might have
00:03:41
a tendency to think that something was
00:03:42
more likely to happen whereas maybe
00:03:44
wasn't really more likely to happen so
00:03:47
keeping track of my predictions was very
00:03:50
helpful I thought it was really
00:03:51
important that i was at forecasting
00:03:54
anonymously at first it made it more i
00:03:58
made me more confident about making
00:04:01
predictions without worrying about their
00:04:03
effect on my reputation and after all
00:04:05
you know i was in this to get better
00:04:08
about forecasting so i wanted to have
00:04:10
the ability to take to make bets or you
00:04:14
know answer questions in a way that i
00:04:15
thought was correct without worrying
00:04:17
about how that might be seen somewhere
00:04:19
else and that really built up my
00:04:21
confidence and actually through being
00:04:23
right then frequently to it built up my
00:04:27
confidence to the point that i was
00:04:29
willing to reveal who i was and then got
00:04:31
to experience the whole other dynamic of
00:04:34
people knowing I was an expert wondering
00:04:37
what I thought about things and then
00:04:38
having to be cautious about not relying
00:04:40
too much on my expert knowledge but
00:04:42
still thinking about the wisdom of the
00:04:44
crowd so I think the anonymity is really
00:04:46
important and also realizing that the
00:04:49
magic of this whole study is in
00:04:52
revealing that everybody has important
00:04:55
information and at different times
00:04:57
different people's information will be
00:04:59
really valid and especially important
00:05:02
and finding that right balance between
00:05:04
being confident in your own views and
00:05:06
and being open to the views of others
00:05:12
so in my work this experience has been
00:05:17
extremely important I am now working on
00:05:20
an article about the rise of China that
00:05:23
I would not have written if it had not
00:05:26
been from my experience in the good
00:05:27
judgment project by having to constantly
00:05:30
update my knowledge about China's
00:05:33
economic capabilities and its military
00:05:34
capabilities in order to do well in this
00:05:36
game I kept up at a much finer green
00:05:40
level with things that were happening in
00:05:43
China and that have changed my forecast
00:05:48
about how international relations will
00:05:50
work over the next couple of decades so
00:05:52
I'm an international relations scholar
00:05:53
one of the most important things in the
00:05:55
international relations field right now
00:05:58
is this question of of does the United
00:06:00
States have peer competitors is China
00:06:03
one yet and this experience helped me
00:06:06
see that it is so it's really
00:06:08
dramatically changed my career and the
00:06:10
process of going through the confidence
00:06:14
building process of you know learning
00:06:17
how to articulate forecasts learning how
00:06:20
to be how to express them in
00:06:24
probabilistic terms how to be confident
00:06:26
even if I'm not completely sure has made
00:06:29
me willing to take the risk of going out
00:06:31
on this really controversial subject
00:06:52
you

Episode Highlights

  • The Good Judgment Project
    Engaging in the Good Judgment Project enhanced my forecasting skills and confidence.
    “I wanted to build these skills”
    @ 00m 31s
    February 25, 2016
  • Exploring Biases
    I learned to explore my biases and focus on my strengths.
    “I didn’t want to just go with that impulse.”
    @ 02m 20s
    February 25, 2016
  • Anonymity in Forecasting
    Forecasting anonymously built my confidence and allowed me to focus on accuracy.
    “It made me more confident about making predictions.”
    @ 03m 54s
    February 25, 2016
  • Impact on Career
    My experience in the project dramatically changed my career and understanding of international relations.
    “This experience helped me see that it is.”
    @ 06m 08s
    February 25, 2016

Episode Quotes

  • I learned to think about what my strengths were.
    Adams Karen SF
  • Keeping track of my predictions was very helpful.
    Adams Karen SF
  • The magic of this whole study is in revealing that everybody has important information.
    Adams Karen SF
  • This experience helped me see that China is a peer competitor.
    Adams Karen SF

Key Moments

  • Forecasting Skills00:31
  • Bias Exploration02:16
  • Anonymity Benefits03:54
  • Career Transformation06:08

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Superforecaster Full Video
February 26, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:01:33
Superforecaster Full Video
Roth Steve SF
February 25, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
06:12
Roth Steve SF
Why an Open Mind Is Key to Making Better Predictions
October 02, 2015
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
26:30
Why an Open Mind Is Key to Making Better Predictions
Topp William SF
February 25, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
13:27
Topp William SF
Beugoms, Jean Pierre
February 26, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
11:26
Beugoms, Jean Pierre
Rich Elaine SF
February 25, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
06:53
Rich Elaine SF
Chang Welton SF
February 25, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
08:57
Chang Welton SF
Rogg David SF
February 25, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
08:15
Rogg David SF
Building Better Forecasters
May 18, 2015
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
12:14
Building Better Forecasters
Untangling Skill and Luck in Business
March 06, 2013
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
21:21
Untangling Skill and Luck in Business
The Rewards of Studying Risk
December 17, 2015
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
36:25
The Rewards of Studying Risk
See Sooner, Act Faster
January 10, 2020
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
27:34
See Sooner, Act Faster