Search Captions & Ask AI

Cartels: A Hidden Evil in the Marketplace

April 28, 2016 / 12:54

This episode features Wharton professor Joe Harrington discussing his research on the duration of discovered cartels and its implications for antitrust policy.

Harrington explains that collusion among firms leads to artificially high prices and reduced competition, a significant concern for antitrust authorities. He references Justice Antonin Scalia's view of collusion as the "supreme evil of antitrust." The conversation highlights the challenge of understanding the actual number and duration of cartels, as only discovered cartels are observed.

The discussion covers Harrington's theoretical framework for analyzing cartel duration, which suggests that the average duration of discovered cartels may be an overestimate of all cartels. He provides data indicating that the average duration of discovered cartels is around five to eight years.

Harrington also discusses the implications of his research for evaluating antitrust policies, particularly the corporate leniency program. This program encourages whistleblowing among cartel members, and Harrington plans to analyze its impact on cartel duration.

In conclusion, Harrington notes that the bias in measuring cartel duration is not as significant as previously thought, which could influence the robustness of economic conclusions drawn from existing data.

TL;DR

Professor Joe Harrington discusses cartel duration and its implications for antitrust policy, emphasizing the challenges of measuring undiscovered cartels.

Episode

12:54
00:00:01
i'm here at wharton professor Joe
00:00:03
Harrington to talk about his paper what
00:00:06
can a duration of discovered cartels
00:00:08
tell us about the duration of all
00:00:10
cartels welcome professor I'm glad to be
00:00:14
here so tell us about your paper well it
00:00:17
starts with the issue of collusion and
00:00:19
the probably was best stated by recently
00:00:23
deceased Justice Antonin Scalia who
00:00:25
referred to collusion as the supreme
00:00:27
evil of antitrust so collusion is all
00:00:30
about the fact that firms which we count
00:00:32
upon to compete for the business of
00:00:33
customers and in doing so result in
00:00:36
lower prices better products and the
00:00:37
like in some industries they decide that
00:00:40
that leads to profits that are too low
00:00:42
and so what they do is they engage an
00:00:44
unlawful coordination of their behavior
00:00:46
they decide to set of driving prices
00:00:49
down in order to get customers business
00:00:52
a sigh well well how about we all set
00:00:54
artificially high prices share the
00:00:56
market and we'll all earn high profits
00:00:58
and so collusion is a real challenge has
00:01:01
become particularly so in the last
00:01:02
several decades I would say 30 years ago
00:01:05
if you asked an official the Antitrust
00:01:07
Division the Department of Justice they
00:01:08
whether there are any global cartels
00:01:10
other than the type like OPEC they would
00:01:13
have said no but the fact is we observed
00:01:15
many global cartels as well as many
00:01:17
domestic cartels in in the last couple
00:01:20
decades so a challenge in terms of
00:01:23
understanding cartels you know asking
00:01:26
well how many unlawful cartels are there
00:01:28
out there you know how bad are they how
00:01:30
much do they raise prices how long do
00:01:32
they last we face a challenge which is
00:01:36
common to criminal behavior which is
00:01:38
these criminals want to hide themselves
00:01:40
so what we observe are just those
00:01:44
cartels that are unfortunate enough to
00:01:46
be discovered and convicted so a
00:01:49
challenge gets to be which is well we
00:01:51
know how many discover cartels are out
00:01:53
there we know how long they last we know
00:01:55
how high a price they said but is that
00:01:58
representative of the actual latent
00:02:00
population of all cartels so where this
00:02:03
again kind of specifically for example
00:02:04
manifest self in terms of a policy
00:02:06
challenge is suppose the Antitrust
00:02:09
Division puts in place a new program and
00:02:11
they want to know is it kind of is it
00:02:14
proving to be beneficial
00:02:15
is it actually helping to reduce the
00:02:17
presence of collusion well all we can
00:02:19
observe is what's happening to the kind
00:02:23
of population that of discover cartels
00:02:25
so if for example we observe more
00:02:28
discover cartels is that because the
00:02:30
program maybe is working to make
00:02:32
discovery more likely and that's good or
00:02:34
maybe is counterproductive maybe what's
00:02:37
doing is actually creating more cartels
00:02:38
and that's why there's more discover
00:02:40
cartels so that's kind of the starting
00:02:42
point to this research which is trying
00:02:45
to determine what is it what it is we
00:02:47
can learn about the underlying latent
00:02:50
you know Universal cartels from those
00:02:52
that we actually discover and
00:02:54
specifically what the research is
00:02:56
concerned with is the issue of the
00:02:58
duration of cartels so we can measure
00:03:01
and there have been many studies that
00:03:02
have measured how long discovered
00:03:04
cartels last these studies if the
00:03:07
average duration ranges from five to
00:03:09
eight years depending on the study and
00:03:11
the issue as well as that kind of a good
00:03:13
proxy for the duration of all cartels
00:03:16
and so what this research is designed to
00:03:18
do is to try to provide a kind of a
00:03:22
method to kind of getting at you know
00:03:24
how much bias there might be in looking
00:03:27
at discover cartels with regards to the
00:03:30
universe of cartels so what are some key
00:03:33
takeaways of the paper well the the
00:03:36
paper kind of to answer that question
00:03:38
they say that the paper kind of big stew
00:03:40
contributions first what it does is it
00:03:42
puts forth a theoretical framework
00:03:44
that's kind of think through these
00:03:45
issues and understand well when will
00:03:48
bias occur in what direction and what in
00:03:50
the way it does this it constructs a
00:03:52
model of the birth death and discovery
00:03:55
of cartels and and one of the things
00:03:57
that it shows and this is in the context
00:04:00
of if you read many papers and the
00:04:02
literature some economists will say that
00:04:04
well the measured duration of discover
00:04:08
cartels is an over estimate of the
00:04:10
actual true duration and some will say
00:04:12
it's an underestimate and so what we
00:04:14
want to do is put forth a theoretical
00:04:16
framework where we can say precisely you
00:04:17
know when is it an over under estimate
00:04:19
what drives that and so what we find is
00:04:21
that if cartels differ a lot in terms of
00:04:26
their the likelihood that they'll
00:04:28
collapse
00:04:29
once again think about the death here of
00:04:30
a cartel you know Cardinals born it
00:04:33
could just internally collapse as we've
00:04:35
observed with sometimes lawful cartels
00:04:37
like OPEC which is right now now that
00:04:40
you know not very functional of and so
00:04:42
it could just die that way it could be
00:04:44
discovered and its conviction would lead
00:04:47
to its collapse so we can think about
00:04:49
cartels is differing in these two key
00:04:51
characteristics what's the likelihood of
00:04:53
collapsing at say in a year what's
00:04:55
likely to being discovered in a year if
00:04:57
cartels tend to vary really largely in
00:05:01
terms of the likelihood of collapse what
00:05:04
we find is that the measured duration of
00:05:06
discover cartels is an over estimate of
00:05:09
the true duration and the reason the
00:05:11
intuition is that if you have a cartel
00:05:13
that's really very stable with a low
00:05:15
chance to collapse it just hangs around
00:05:17
for a long time and has plenty of
00:05:20
opportunities to be discovered cartels
00:05:22
that are short live will tend to die and
00:05:25
avoid discovery so so the bias in that
00:05:28
case will work towards saying that well
00:05:30
if we measure for example the average
00:05:33
duration discovered cartels to be lets
00:05:35
say six years that that probably is an
00:05:37
over estimate now there's other
00:05:40
assumptions you can make whereby you
00:05:42
give buys go in the other direction so
00:05:44
but but one contribution and takeaways
00:05:46
is to be able to kind of frame these
00:05:48
issues so we can understand okay what
00:05:50
drives bias the other contribution and
00:05:54
more where I think the the key takeaway
00:05:55
is is to then uses framework to get a
00:05:58
measure about the extent of this bias
00:06:00
how big is it so we take this framework
00:06:03
and we use data on convicted cartels by
00:06:07
the Antitrust Division from say 1961 to
00:06:11
cartels that were born from 61 to 80 4
00:06:13
and we can use that data to get a map
00:06:17
first of all if you just you could just
00:06:18
measure the average duration of these
00:06:20
convicted cartels and it's a five point
00:06:22
eight years but we can use this
00:06:24
framework then get a sense of how big is
00:06:26
the bias with regards to the duration of
00:06:29
action all the cartels those also those
00:06:32
that are undiscovered and what we find
00:06:33
is that and I think one of the
00:06:35
surprising kind of results is that the
00:06:37
bias is actually is not that large we
00:06:38
find kind of a kind of high likelihood
00:06:41
the duration
00:06:43
average duration of all cartels probably
00:06:45
ranges from about five point two to six
00:06:47
point eight years right so what are some
00:06:50
practical implications of your research
00:06:52
I think probably the most subsidy one is
00:06:55
regards to evaluating policy you know
00:06:58
it's a I think there's been a lot of
00:07:00
policy innovations by various
00:07:02
competition authorities one of the big
00:07:04
challenges is determining well are they
00:07:07
helping in the fight against cartels you
00:07:09
know are they resulting in fewer cartels
00:07:11
reducing the overcharge resulting in
00:07:13
lower duration and I said the challenge
00:07:16
here is that we don't directly measure
00:07:17
those things so it's not like with some
00:07:20
types of crime where we can measure the
00:07:23
crime rate because all the crimes are
00:07:25
reported in case the cartels it is
00:07:28
criminal but those who are harm don't
00:07:31
necessarily know that they've been
00:07:32
harmed they don't know that they paid
00:07:34
excessively for this good so so that's a
00:07:37
real policy challenge and they could be
00:07:39
more concrete about this probably the
00:07:42
biggest innovation in policy in fighting
00:07:45
cartels in the last 30 years has been
00:07:46
the revision of the corporate leniency
00:07:48
programme by the Antitrust Division so
00:07:51
this is kind of an age-old idea with
00:07:53
conspiracies which is that if someone
00:07:57
from the conspiracy comes forward
00:07:58
cooperates with the authorities they'll
00:08:00
be absolved the government penalties
00:08:01
okay so this was a program that was in
00:08:03
place starting in nineteen seventy eight
00:08:05
but it had certain design flaws to it
00:08:07
was rarely used 93 it was revised I was
00:08:11
made kind of you know kind of
00:08:12
structurally sound and immediately the
00:08:14
leniency application started coming in
00:08:16
so it's been certainly successful as
00:08:19
measured by the number leniency
00:08:21
applications it's been adopted by many
00:08:23
other jurisdictions probably more than
00:08:26
50 countries and unions have a leniency
00:08:27
programme but still the question is well
00:08:31
but is it affecting the actual
00:08:33
population of cartels and that's a
00:08:34
difficult question so one of the things
00:08:37
we want to do here is with this kind of
00:08:40
approach is it can provide a method to
00:08:43
try to measure the impact of a program
00:08:46
such as the leniency programme to
00:08:48
specifically address the question of has
00:08:51
it for example resulted in cartels be
00:08:54
enough shorter duration that would be an
00:08:56
immediate
00:08:56
benefit from that and so so that's
00:08:59
something we plan to do kind of in the
00:09:01
next step of this research project we've
00:09:02
looked at using this model to measure
00:09:07
the underlying duration of cartels with
00:09:10
data prior to the revision leniency
00:09:12
programme and that was somewhat do to
00:09:14
kind of data limitations but a new data
00:09:16
set has recently become available and
00:09:18
that will encompass cartels that were
00:09:20
born and died after the advent of
00:09:23
leniency programme and so we can redo
00:09:25
the analysis and then see well what has
00:09:27
happened to the duration of cartels kind
00:09:29
of before and after the leniency
00:09:31
programme this won't be able to tell a
00:09:33
kind of causality story but I think it
00:09:35
will provide some kind of kind of needed
00:09:38
data to speak to the issue of well what
00:09:41
impact are these programs having what
00:09:44
conclusions of any surprised you I think
00:09:47
the biggest one was that there wasn't as
00:09:48
much bias as I would have expected I
00:09:50
think that's been a a running concern of
00:09:53
of economists and policymakers in this
00:09:56
context but the bias is definitely there
00:09:59
we definitely find evidence of it but
00:10:01
it's not as large as one would have
00:10:03
thought so so let's Viswa yup I think
00:10:06
some of the conclusions drawn based upon
00:10:09
what were known to be biased estimates
00:10:12
probably most of them are robust because
00:10:14
of the fact that we find the device
00:10:15
isn't actually that large so what sets
00:10:18
your research apart from prior work in
00:10:21
this area well I think this is a topic
00:10:24
which people kind of talked about and
00:10:28
mentioned as they engage in the analysis
00:10:30
saying well okay our data is probably
00:10:33
biased because it's just discovered
00:10:35
cartels and and those could be very
00:10:37
different from the universe of cartels
00:10:39
you could easily imagine that well we're
00:10:42
just discovering the ones that are you
00:10:44
know that very ineffective and that's
00:10:46
why they're being discovered of or as I
00:10:49
said before we could be discovering the
00:10:51
ones that are really stable and
00:10:52
effective and so they're around for a
00:10:54
long time with lots of opportunities to
00:10:56
be discovered that was kind of
00:10:59
recognized and mentioned and then people
00:11:01
just went forward and just kind of did
00:11:04
their work as if the the data was not
00:11:06
biased this is really the first study to
00:11:08
say well let's see what we can actually
00:11:10
say
00:11:10
the extent to the bias and is it really
00:11:13
that large and to what extent can we
00:11:14
kind of compensate for it you know in
00:11:16
our conclusions so how will you follow
00:11:19
up this research well I think right now
00:11:22
what we're going to be doing as I said
00:11:23
it's going to be a follow-up empirical
00:11:25
analysis kind of looking at date using
00:11:27
data from the post leniency programme
00:11:29
era so C would get some sort of
00:11:31
assessment about whether duration has
00:11:32
been impacted by Lindsay program I think
00:11:36
where one can also make advances in
00:11:39
terms of the theoretical framework right
00:11:42
now the framework itself is kind of
00:11:44
sparse in terms of how it models the
00:11:46
birth death and discovery of cartels but
00:11:49
there's kind of a developing literature
00:11:50
in economics on how to how to model
00:11:54
birth you know what determines whether
00:11:56
or not a cartel is created you know what
00:11:57
in kind of inspires managers to say well
00:12:01
let's not compete anymore let's collude
00:12:03
what causes cartels to collapse there's
00:12:06
a kind of a rather large does body work
00:12:09
on that and unless so in terms of what
00:12:11
leads to discovery but I think trying to
00:12:14
take it into account those those
00:12:15
structures get a richer structure to
00:12:18
embed that within our framework so we
00:12:20
can tell kind of a richer story about
00:12:22
the kind of the life cycle cartels from
00:12:24
when they're born and when they die well
00:12:27
thank you very much for joining us it's
00:12:29
a pleasure been in being here
00:12:46
you

Episode Highlights

  • Understanding Collusion
    Professor Harrington discusses the nature of collusion and its implications for antitrust law.
    “Collusion is all about the unlawful coordination of behavior.”
    @ 00m 37s
    April 28, 2016
  • Research on Cartel Duration
    The paper investigates the duration of discovered cartels and the biases in measurement.
    “The measured duration of discovered cartels is an overestimate of the true duration.”
    @ 05m 06s
    April 28, 2016
  • Impact of Leniency Programs
    The revision of leniency programs has increased applications but questions remain about their effectiveness.
    “The biggest innovation in policy in fighting cartels has been the revision of the leniency program.”
    @ 07m 45s
    April 28, 2016

Episode Quotes

  • Collusion is the supreme evil of antitrust.
    Cartels: A Hidden Evil in the Marketplace
  • The bias is actually not that large.
    Cartels: A Hidden Evil in the Marketplace

Key Moments

  • Collusion Defined00:23
  • Duration of Cartels02:58
  • Leniency Program Impact07:45

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Collusion Among AI Traders – Wharton Professor Itay Goldstein Explains Research
June 17, 2024
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
12:21
Collusion Among AI Traders – Wharton Professor Itay Goldstein Explains Research
How to Regulate Innovation -- Without Killing It
February 03, 2017
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
21:11
How to Regulate Innovation -- Without Killing It
AI presents the risk for collusion in investing in financial markets.
August 01, 2024
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
00:52
AI presents the risk for collusion in investing in financial markets.
Collaboration or Competition? Why Many Business Alliances Break Down
July 29, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
14:58
Collaboration or Competition? Why Many Business Alliances Break Down
Wharton Professor Olivier Chatain on Friction and Competition
July 21, 2009
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
08:19
Wharton Professor Olivier Chatain on Friction and Competition
The Hidden Tax Strategy Behind the Unilever–McCormick Merger
April 17, 2026
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
10:07
The Hidden Tax Strategy Behind the Unilever–McCormick Merger
The Re-wiring of Global Supply Chains
March 02, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
17:13
The Re-wiring of Global Supply Chains
How Disinformation Spreads Online
November 18, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
20:49
How Disinformation Spreads Online
Doha Debacle: What's Next for Global Commerce
August 06, 2008
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
24:04
Doha Debacle: What's Next for Global Commerce
Trade War with China
May 02, 2019
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
30:13
Trade War with China
Unlocking Green Tech at Home
February 18, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
16:16
Unlocking Green Tech at Home
How Big Data Ties Politically Connected Bankers to Pre-TARP Insider Trading
September 26, 2016
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
21:58
How Big Data Ties Politically Connected Bankers to Pre-TARP Insider Trading