
This episode features Wharton professor Joe Harrington discussing his research on the duration of discovered cartels and its implications for antitrust policy.
Harrington explains that collusion among firms leads to artificially high prices and reduced competition, a significant concern for antitrust authorities. He references Justice Antonin Scalia's view of collusion as the "supreme evil of antitrust." The conversation highlights the challenge of understanding the actual number and duration of cartels, as only discovered cartels are observed.
The discussion covers Harrington's theoretical framework for analyzing cartel duration, which suggests that the average duration of discovered cartels may be an overestimate of all cartels. He provides data indicating that the average duration of discovered cartels is around five to eight years.
Harrington also discusses the implications of his research for evaluating antitrust policies, particularly the corporate leniency program. This program encourages whistleblowing among cartel members, and Harrington plans to analyze its impact on cartel duration.
In conclusion, Harrington notes that the bias in measuring cartel duration is not as significant as previously thought, which could influence the robustness of economic conclusions drawn from existing data.
Professor Joe Harrington discusses cartel duration and its implications for antitrust policy, emphasizing the challenges of measuring undiscovered cartels.

Collusion is the supreme evil of antitrust.Cartels: A Hidden Evil in the Marketplace
The bias is actually not that large.Cartels: A Hidden Evil in the Marketplace