Search Captions & Ask AI

Retention Plans: Why Offering Rewards to Stay Can Drive Customers Away

May 26, 2015 / 07:47

This episode discusses the efficacy of retention campaigns, featuring a case study with a cell phone company. Key topics include the effectiveness of mass marketing versus targeted campaigns, customer behavior analysis, and the importance of data-driven decision-making.

The conversation highlights a field experiment where a retention campaign was implemented for one group of customers while another group received no campaign. Surprisingly, the group that received the retention campaign experienced a higher churn rate, with 10 percent leaving compared to 6 percent in the control group.

Key findings suggest that retention campaigns may not be effective on a broad scale. Instead, they should be targeted to specific customer segments based on observable behavior patterns, such as usage trends and consumption variability.

The discussion also emphasizes the importance of correctly analyzing A/B testing results. It notes that self-selection by customers can skew perceptions of campaign success, making it crucial for companies to understand the causal impact of their marketing strategies.

Future work in this area includes a collaboration with a company in Austin to study energy consumption and smart meters, aiming to enhance consumer understanding of tariff structures through field experiments.

TLDR

Retention campaigns can backfire if not targeted; a case study reveals higher churn rates with mass marketing.

Episode

7:47
00:00:02
um so this particular research involved looking at the efficacy of retention campaigns so many companies do retention
00:00:08
campaigns this is basically campaigns which are targeted towards consumers they want to keep those consumers so
00:00:13
they might give incentives for example you might kind of say for your next purchase you might get ten dollars off
00:00:18
so these campaigns are very common and many companies think that these campaigns work do they really work so we
00:00:24
had an opportunity to work with a cell phone company which was trying to do these retention campaigns what was great
00:00:29
for us is that they actually did a field experiment for one group of customers who were randomly selected they did a
00:00:35
retention campaign this was a pricing plan campaign for another group customers they did nothing what did we
00:00:40
find the group of customers who are actually in the retention campaign actually left a lot more in fact
00:00:47
staggeringly a lot more this was pretty bad for the company so what's the big
00:00:51
picture do retention campaigns work actually on mass they might not work what we found was a more nuanced finding
00:00:57
they work but only if you're that targeted so do retention campaigns but do it in a targeted way
00:01:06
so the key takeaways again focus on retention campaigns i think primarily as many companies start thinking about
00:01:12
these campaigns the typical thing that most companies do is do a mass-marketed campaign send a retention package to
00:01:19
every one of their customers why because it's easy to do they don't have to think
00:01:22
too much they'll send it to everyone what did we find sometimes actually sending campaigns to people might
00:01:28
actually make them start questioning their own behavior for instance in this particular case for the cell phone
00:01:34
company when they sent a retention campaign which was basically about looking at people's behavior their usage
00:01:39
patterns and saying look there might be other plans that might be better for you
00:01:43
it made many customers question whether a they were getting a good deal and if they're getting a good deal here
00:01:49
why not look elsewhere so what that suggests is retention campaigns must often be targeted campaigns so think
00:01:55
carefully about who in your customer base might be likely to leave don't do it mass do it on a targeted
00:02:02
basis so on the surface when you think about it again going back to this idea of
00:02:09
retention campaigns most people think the retention campaigns work so let me give you some hard numbers what we found
00:02:15
so in the study that we did when we did the retention campaign and this was for a bunch of customers
00:02:20
from a telecom service we monitored their behavior three months before the campaign and three months after the
00:02:25
campaign what we found was when when these customers who were in the retention campaign we looked at what happens three
00:02:31
months afterwards 10 of these customers left the service as opposed to a control
00:02:36
group where no campaigns were done six percent left the service so you would imagine on the surface four percent is a
00:02:42
staggeringly high rate of churn now should companies not do these campaigns that's not what we found what
00:02:48
we found was on average yes it's very hard to kind of find evidence whether retention campaigns work but it
00:02:54
was very easy to find evidence for who it worked for there were many sets of customers which had certain
00:03:00
characteristics which are very easy for firms to observe for whom these campaigns work so surprising fact was on
00:03:06
average they didn't work and for many companies i think this is an eye opener because what they should
00:03:11
be thinking carefully about is how should we customize even our retention campaigns
00:03:19
so i think this is very interesting in terms of customization what is uh what is very good nowadays is especially many
00:03:25
companies who are data driven they have a lot of information about their customers so for instance in the mobile
00:03:30
phone context companies routinely gather information about past consumption in our case we had information for example
00:03:37
in the past three months that we had been collecting you know what was the level of overage which is the amount
00:03:41
that people are going consuming over the number of plant minutes we had information about how much variability
00:03:47
do they have you know in one month are they using 100 minutes in the other month are they suddenly using 200
00:03:51
minutes or two you know 500 minutes so these are very observable types of patterns that you can find in your own
00:03:57
customer base so many times what we found was cutting up the data on customers using these observable
00:04:02
patterns might be a great way to customize so let me give you a specific example
00:04:07
in our case what we found was that people who were consuming a lot way above the number of minutes that they
00:04:13
had consumers who had a huge amount of variation consumers who had negative trend over
00:04:18
the time that they were consuming less and less those were the people who are likely to
00:04:22
leave and it cannot be surprising for many of these customers doing the retention
00:04:27
campaign actually made them more likely to leave so sometimes it's best to let sleeping
00:04:33
dogs lie now i think one of the interesting thing that's going on nowadays especially if
00:04:41
you think about big data analytics and all of that is companies are rapidly experimenting
00:04:46
so many many companies out there do routinely do a b testing now what did we find here what we found here was it's
00:04:52
not enough to just do a b testing it's important to analyze the data correctly
00:04:56
so let me give you a specific example in our a b test one group was the people who received recommendations the other
00:05:02
group was people who received no recommendations on the surface people who received
00:05:06
recommendations in that group and who accepted them actually churned less as compared to the control group
00:05:13
now you would imagine well then one might think that the retention campaign worked but what's
00:05:18
important to remember is that customers decided to accept the campaign so there is self-selection there so even for
00:05:25
people who are exposed to the campaign and decided not to accept it they actually churned a lot more so the very
00:05:31
fact that they were exposed to the campaign changed their behavior so it's important when companies are doing a b
00:05:37
testing they think carefully about what's randomized and what's self-selected by consumers glossing over
00:05:43
the fact can actually lead them to think that some campaigns are successful when
00:05:47
they are not and a b testing is something that we believe is going to be rapidly taking
00:05:52
off in this date of in the day of data analytics but again doing a b testing is easy
00:05:58
analyzing it and interpreting the results correctly is way more important so a lot of people including some of my
00:06:07
own work has looked at pricing plans and how customers choose among pricing plans
00:06:12
what's a big problem there many of these things are self-selected by consumers so
00:06:16
from a company's perspective if they want to look at the causal impact of what happens when they give pricing
00:06:21
plans it's difficult to do so a prior right because there's an aspect of
00:06:25
consumer self-selection involved so how do we get around this convincing a company that they should do a field
00:06:30
experiment that is the gold standard of causal interpretation what we ended up doing was doing a field experiment where
00:06:37
again people were given some pricing plans and some people were not given any recommendations so that helped us give a
00:06:43
causal interpretation which was very very hard to do so just using secondary data which many researchers have done
00:06:53
so i think what i'd like to continue on is work more on this area of pricing
00:06:57
plans and recommendations i'm actually working with a company down in austin
00:07:00
which is starting to look at energy consumption and the whole idea of smart meters how do we make people understand
00:07:07
that when they are they are consuming electricity they are on different tariffs and different tiers what we're
00:07:11
trying to do actually is to do a field experiment again making things salient to consumers and seeing how they might
00:07:17
change their energy consumption over time or over days depending upon how much they're consuming now so that's the
00:07:22
next plan you

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 60
    Most shocking
  • 60
    Best concept / idea
  • 60
    Biggest twist

Episode Highlights

  • Retention Campaigns: Do They Work?
    A study reveals that mass retention campaigns may not be effective, highlighting the need for targeted approaches.
    “What we found was a more nuanced finding: they work but only if you're targeted.”
    @ 00m 55s
    May 26, 2015
  • The Power of Data Analytics
    Companies must analyze customer behavior data to customize retention campaigns effectively.
    “Analyzing it and interpreting the results correctly is way more important.”
    @ 05m 58s
    May 26, 2015

Episode Quotes

  • Do retention campaigns work?
    Retention Plans: Why Offering Rewards to Stay Can Drive Customers Away
  • Sometimes it's best to let sleeping dogs lie.
    Retention Plans: Why Offering Rewards to Stay Can Drive Customers Away
  • It's important to analyze the data correctly.
    Retention Plans: Why Offering Rewards to Stay Can Drive Customers Away

Key Moments

  • Retention Campaigns00:51
  • Targeted Marketing00:55
  • Data-Driven Decisions05:58

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown