Search Captions & Ask AI

NCAA Settlement Reshapes the Future of College Athletics

June 20, 2025 / 09:55

This episode discusses the implications of the recent House versus NCAA ruling on college athlete compensation, featuring insights from Rob Deji, a sports marketing lecturer at Wharton.

Rob Deji explains the significance of the judge's decision that allows colleges to pay athletes, highlighting the potential changes in college athletics. He notes that the ruling will enable current athletes to share in revenue generated from media, sponsorship, and ticketing.

The conversation addresses the impact on non-revenue sports, with Deji expressing concerns that funding for these programs may diminish as universities allocate more resources to football and basketball.

Deji also discusses the rise of collectives, where donors pool resources to pay athletes, and the legal complexities surrounding this new compensation structure. He emphasizes the uncertainty of the future of college athletics as schools adapt to these changes.

Finally, Deji reflects on the potential transformation of college sports into a minor league system, raising concerns about the loss of amateurism and the essence of student competition.

TLDR

Rob Deji discusses the implications of the House versus NCAA ruling on college athlete compensation and its future impact on college sports.

Episode

9:55
00:00:00
Well, the question of paying college athletes for their performance on the field has been one talked about for many
00:00:06
decades with the last five years really seeing even greater focus. But a recent judge's decision in the House versus
00:00:13
NCAA case has now led to a door opening where colleges will be able to pay athletes without breaking any previous
00:00:21
rules. But what does this mean for the future of college athletics? Pleasure to be joined by Rob Deji who's a lecturer
00:00:27
in the sports marketing department here at the Wharton School and also founder of Iron Horse Marketing. Hi Rob. Good to
00:00:33
talk to you again. Nice to speak to you too, Dan. All right, so let's I mean
00:00:37
we've known this was it's been here for a little while, but in terms of this
00:00:42
settlement, what was your reaction? Well, it it took a while for her final approval. The big last hearing was on
00:00:50
April 7th, so everyone was just waiting. Is today the day? is today the day and finally late Friday the final approval
00:00:57
came down really with minimal changes from that last hearing on April 7th grandfathering in really walk-ons
00:01:05
because of the change of roster limits now replacing scholarship limits. So I I'm I'm thrilled that the new era is
00:01:12
here and excited about all the people commenting about it and eager to see what happens because it's anything new
00:01:18
like this is going to drive a lot of different changes. And for those that don't follow it, a lot of this will be
00:01:24
based on the revenues that the universities are able to uh bring in uh for their athletic programs. Correct. In
00:01:32
terms of how much they will be paying out. Well, the calculations in the settlement were definitely generated by
00:01:37
that. There's a couple different components to this settlement. First, there's the
00:01:42
issue of back pay for damages for players who participated between 2016 and 24. But going forward, current
00:01:49
athletes will share in revenue generated from media sponsorship and ticketing revenue. And that was calculated by 22%
00:01:57
of the average revenue from those sources across the power five now power four conferences.
00:02:05
All right. But when you talk about this, then there's the discussion about what
00:02:08
has been and what will be moving forward in terms of the other parties that have
00:02:15
either legally or illegally contributed finances to athletes. Uh it used to be, you know, donors under the table. I
00:02:23
guess it kind of developed into collectives. What does this mean for that side of this equation? Well, I
00:02:30
think that's a big open issue. Since July 1st, 2021, the NCAA removed its restrictions on
00:02:37
students earning student athletes in particular earning money on their uh name, image, and likeness. What quickly
00:02:43
came together with these collectives where essentially donors would pull their money to set up a company that
00:02:49
contracted with the student athlete who would receive compensation in return for
00:02:55
some voluntary days. It's really odd. It's I've just said something quite
00:02:59
contradictory there. compensation for their volunteering efforts. Yeah. Right. They would volunteer at a a charity and
00:03:06
that charity could use their name, image, and likeness, but they would be paid a million dollars for that. What
00:03:12
that really means is we need a new left tackle and you could get that money. It's different than using your name,
00:03:17
image, and likeness to drive uh test drives at a car dealership. And so, there's two separate types of NIL. I
00:03:24
talk about this in class. There's there's real NIL and there is the payforplay NIL. So what the big question
00:03:31
is what happens with that payforplay NIL that is really a means to exceed this new compensation cap which is different
00:03:40
than a pro cap because that's a negotiated amount between a the management and a union. In this case
00:03:46
it's a cap resulting from a legal settlement. So now what happens with this extra money? What I'm worried
00:03:53
about, what people, the way I see it, it's as if NFL teams were passing the hat around the stadium because they
00:03:58
wanted to exceed the salary cap that had been legally negotiated with the management in the union. In terms of the
00:04:05
money though that universities will be able to pay out, the expectation is that uh the football and basketball programs
00:04:12
will be the ones that see the majority of the money. So I guess the question becomes what happens to or what do the
00:04:18
athletes in the nonrevenue driving sports get at you know probably the the the crumbs at the bottom of the barrel?
00:04:26
Well the that is a is a issue right for additional legal thing legal uh challenges but what's worse is they
00:04:34
don't just get the crumbs they may get worse than no payment. their sports may
00:04:39
be eliminated because the athletic departments are going to have to come up with this this money to pay the athletes
00:04:45
somewhere. And like any other business, if you suddenly have a new expense, you're either going to have to generate
00:04:50
more revenue or cut expenses from elsewhere. And so, we're going to see schools cutting expenses, cutting staff
00:04:56
in their athletic department, not having as much money to pay coaches, or doing things a little more aggressively from a
00:05:01
revenue generating standpoint than they've never done before. jersey patches say on their uniforms. Uh and
00:05:08
you we're already as you said seeing examples of that. One which some people
00:05:12
may know about is from here in the Philadelphia area uh Brennan College uh eliminated all of its sports and they
00:05:20
had 800 students in their school. 400 of them played athletics. So this is you know these are the stories we're going
00:05:27
to see play out. St. Francis making its changes from division one to division three. We're we're talking about, you
00:05:33
know, all the changes that have occurred in college athletics in the last few years with conference jumping. I think
00:05:38
we're getting ready for a whole new set of of changes coming forward. It's far
00:05:42
we have not reached the destination. This is one milestone in the journey. There are going to be so many changes
00:05:48
going on over the next few years fueled by additional legal challenges by schools adapting to suddenly having to
00:05:54
pay $20 million a year uh elevating every year 4%. Uh, and so those kind of things are real serious things and no
00:06:04
one not there's going to be a lot of unhappy people. What are your greatest concerns then moving forward with how
00:06:10
these dynamics look now and may play out for I think for the larger scale future
00:06:15
of college athletics? Well, there's so many different things. The power four is
00:06:21
truly going to be like a minor league conference now where basketball and football are going to be compensated.
00:06:27
We're going to lose other sports. We are don't know what's going to happen with
00:06:31
collectives. There's going to be significant antirust violations here where uh where there is a violation of a
00:06:40
salary cap, but it's not a collectively bargain cap and there's not a collective
00:06:44
bargain agreement because there's no union because there's no employees. So
00:06:47
all those issues are still to be addressed. So I I everything is a concern because it's going to be a
00:06:54
massive transformation. And when people ask me how when's this going to finally
00:06:58
end, when's this going to end up? I said, I have no idea. The one thing I'm
00:07:01
certain of, it's not going to end for years. And for the schools that are in
00:07:06
kind of that that grouping of paying uh portions of their revenue out to athletes, uh realistically, they have to
00:07:15
spend all of that money if they want to remain competitive, don't they? Absolutely. If you're in the SEC,
00:07:21
Georgia and Alabama are certainly going to pay their $20.5 million. So, Mississippi State and Vanderbilt and uh
00:07:28
Arkansas are all going to have to step up to stay competitive. And then it trickles down to the other conferences
00:07:34
well as well. And if the conferences all came together and said, "Hey guys, this
00:07:38
is too much. Let's make it $10 million." Well, there'll be a lawsuit on that for
00:07:42
collusion because now it's a free market system on this. What's going to be
00:07:47
interesting is that the division one no football schools like the Big East Conference, they're not going to have
00:07:52
the burden of having to pay for a football program. So, they may have you're going to see Yukon and
00:07:57
Villanovavva, even though they have they don't have top FBS uh football, they're
00:08:02
going to have more resources to pay their basketball players than Alabama and Florida. But when you think about
00:08:07
the structure of these teams and the people that they're bringing onto their
00:08:11
staffs, I guess this is part of the reason why we're seeing the role of a so-called general manager for school
00:08:18
football programs these days and for basketball programs. and you're going to
00:08:23
see maybe a CEO of the athletic department of which the athletic director much like a pro team where you
00:08:29
have someone handling the sports side and someone handling the business side instead of it all being rolled up into
00:08:34
one like it has been historically. Are you feeling worried about the path that we could be
00:08:42
headed on right now? I'm worried because of the essence of students competing
00:08:47
against students is going away. And that's part of that's ingrained in the
00:08:52
foundation of what college sports are. And it that what um John Paul Stevens in a 1984 trustees versus Oklahoma against
00:09:00
the NCA case said said the revered tradition of amateurism in college athletics. That was 40 years ago. We
00:09:07
know that is that has long gone away. And so at some point what I what I'm worried about is people say, "Well,
00:09:14
let's just forget about this whole going to class thing." And that what a school
00:09:18
is going to do is license its intellectual property, its name, and its logo, and lease its facilities, and
00:09:23
you're truly just going to have a minor league business on the campus of the
00:09:27
university, and the whole students competing against students thing goes away. Rob, great to talk to you again.
00:09:32
Thanks very much. All the best. Always good to speak to you, Dan. Thank you. the Rob DeC lecturer in the sports
00:09:37
marketing department department here at the Wharton

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 60
    Most intense
  • 60
    Best concept / idea
  • 60
    Most influential

Episode Highlights

  • New Era for College Athletics
    A recent judge's decision allows colleges to pay athletes, changing the landscape of college sports.
    “I’m thrilled that the new era is here.”
    @ 01m 12s
    June 20, 2025
  • Concerns Over Non-Revenue Sports
    As universities pay athletes, non-revenue sports may face elimination due to budget cuts.
    “They may get worse than no payment.”
    @ 04m 36s
    June 20, 2025
  • The Future of College Sports
    The transformation of college athletics is just beginning, with many changes on the horizon.
    “We have not reached the destination.”
    @ 05m 42s
    June 20, 2025

Episode Quotes

  • What does this mean for the future of college athletics?
    NCAA Settlement Reshapes the Future of College Athletics
  • This is going to drive a lot of different changes.
    NCAA Settlement Reshapes the Future of College Athletics
  • The one thing I’m certain of, it’s not going to end for years.
    NCAA Settlement Reshapes the Future of College Athletics
  • The essence of students competing against students is going away.
    NCAA Settlement Reshapes the Future of College Athletics

Key Moments

  • NCAA Decision00:13
  • New Compensation Era01:12
  • Concerns for Non-Revenue Sports04:36
  • Transformation of College Athletics05:42

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown