Search Captions & Ask AI

Obama Correct on Net Neutrality

November 19, 2014 / 07:15

This episode features Reid Hunt, former chairman of the FCC, discussing net neutrality and President Obama's recent support for it. Key topics include the implications of net neutrality for internet access and competition among broadband providers.

Hunt explains that President Obama's statement on YouTube emphasized the need for equal access to content without discrimination from internet service providers. He argues that the internet should function like a telephone line, allowing users to connect freely.

The discussion also covers how the President's comments affect content providers like Netflix, highlighting the need for fair treatment among different companies. Hunt notes that the President's message to the FCC was to ensure that all Americans can access the internet equally.

Hunt reflects on the challenges faced by the FCC in gaining bipartisan support, particularly from Republican commissioners. He believes that the President's call for action could be a pivotal moment for net neutrality.

In conclusion, Hunt stresses the importance of the FCC's role in regulating internet access and protecting consumers from monopolistic practices.

TLDR

Reid Hunt discusses net neutrality and President Obama's support for equal internet access in this episode.

Episode

7:15
00:00:02
i'd like to welcome reid hunt to knowledge at wharton today reid is a former chairman of the federal
00:00:07
communications commission i want to ask you what you think about the president president obama recently coming out in
00:00:15
favor of net neutrality i ask you as a former chairman of the fcc and uh obviously knowledgeable about these
00:00:22
issues but also in the context there's a professor here kevin wereback who has
00:00:26
said along with others that the real danger to the internet ecosystem in the us is the
00:00:33
dearth of competition at the broadband provider level so in light of all that what what was your what's your view on
00:00:40
net neutrality and what's what's happened based on the president's statements so
00:00:44
there are two things about the president's statement the first is that he made his statement on youtube this is
00:00:49
a case where the medium is the message he was basically saying you see me on youtube here
00:00:56
everybody in america ought to have the capability to get access to this content or any other
00:01:05
content they want without having to ask the permission of the internet service provider
00:01:11
he was basically saying without without using these words the internet service provider should not
00:01:17
be a sensor or an editor or a gatekeeper who says what website you can get to or
00:01:22
whether or not when you get to that website you can actually watch the video in a high enough quality
00:01:29
he was basically saying there shouldn't be any discrimination imposed on your
00:01:35
personal preferences by the fact that you're limited to just one or two companies that are giving you
00:01:41
internet service so it should access like a telephone line in the old days and you can call anyone you want is that
00:01:46
the idea that's basically what he said um so that was pretty cool the medium
00:01:50
was the message right uh and the second thing he said was he didn't use exactly these words but i
00:01:57
think this was also pretty pretty clear fcc you have had a lot of trouble getting the courts to accept your rules
00:02:05
and you've clued together lots of different compromises just say the following
00:02:11
there is one single common medium of communication for the united states and from the world and it
00:02:17
is called the internet it doesn't need a lot of rules but from time to time we might need the fcc to
00:02:23
establish some rules that will guarantee just two things everybody will have access to this
00:02:30
medium and number two when you have access to it you get to go to the websites that
00:02:35
you want to and you get to do the picking that's what he told the fcc now what
00:02:40
that means legally is please invoke title ii of the law but his message was not meant to be
00:02:51
bogged down in the legal niceties he was saying just do it declare it title ii you don't need that many rules but you
00:02:59
do need to give a guarantee to all americans that they can share as a community in the internet and they can
00:03:07
get to the websites and to the content that they want to reach now that addresses the consumer accessing the
00:03:13
internet behind the internet you have providers you know the netflix and others of the
00:03:18
world who want sort of unrestricted access or they don't they don't want to
00:03:22
be in a slow lane does the president's comments also affect that side of the
00:03:28
internet also yes the president in effect is saying to the fcc suppose that the internet service
00:03:35
provider cuts a sweetheart deal with some particular content company and the purpose of that deal is to
00:03:41
exclude some competitor to that content company suppose that uh the internet service provider says i
00:03:50
like nbc and abc but i don't i'm going to give them the ability to use the internet to
00:03:57
broadcast their material not just over the year but i don't like the local broadcasters
00:04:03
so much so i'm going to keep that person out of the package the president was saying you can't do
00:04:07
that that's another way to discriminate against different content providers and i want
00:04:13
everyone to have the chance to sell on the internet and everyone to have the chance to buy on the internet at the
00:04:18
same speed always or he's saying roughly the act quality of the access needs to
00:04:24
be approximately equal okay uh anything else that we that that we should learn from that statement
00:04:31
what's likely to happen i know there's been it's been difficult for congress to
00:04:35
come to any agreement on on any sort of rules and to give the fcc much direction
00:04:40
there's been conflicting directions that have been trying to be there are five
00:04:44
commissioners at the fcc uh three are democrats two are republicans i would imagine
00:04:52
that the president doesn't expect the republican commissioners to agree with
00:04:56
his position unfortunately as pretty much everyone in the united states knows the president
00:05:02
has really had a hard time getting republicans in congress or at the fcc or in the senate to agree with him on any
00:05:09
topic and i know that he's tried and he's tried and he's tried so the president
00:05:14
then really needs the three democrats at the fcc to listen to pay attention to to inwardly digest and
00:05:24
ultimately to decide to agree that the president is right i think that they will
00:05:29
so um looking at the long game you think that this is a game changer moment i do i don't think it has tremendous uh
00:05:39
economic significance for any of the content companies or any of the internet service providers
00:05:46
they aren't right now basing their business plans on discrimination but you just want to be
00:05:54
careful to make sure as a government that if somebody gets unchallenged to monopoly position in
00:06:03
internet service or builds a tremendous vertical integration business where content and conduit are
00:06:09
combined that you could step in and protect the little guy against the powerful and
00:06:15
that's why it's right for the fcc to declare that it does have the jurisdiction
00:06:20
to look out for everybody in the country if needed so it's providing a level or will provide if
00:06:27
all is approved a level of certainty that's been missing this regulation that
00:06:31
we're talking about is called title ii and some people will say to title two or
00:06:35
not to title two that is the question i would say that really for the agency it is to be or not to be
00:06:43
if you're an agency and you don't have a jurisdictional basis you don't have the
00:06:47
legal authority to pass rules then you're out of business thanks very much you

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown