Search Captions & Ask AI

How Geopolitics Is Hitting Local Gas Stations

February 20, 2026 / 10:41

This episode discusses the impact of US sanctions on Lukoil gas stations in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, focusing on family-run franchises.

Serguei Netessine, a Professor at the Wharton School, explains how these local businesses are affected by geopolitical tensions and sanctions against Russia due to the Ukraine war.

Netessine highlights that while the gasoline is refined in the US, the brand association with a Russian company leads to customer avoidance, complicating the financial situation for franchisees.

The conversation covers the challenges of banking relationships and compliance risks that franchisees face, as well as potential solutions like divestment and rebranding.

Ultimately, Netessine emphasizes the need for transparent customer messaging and collaboration among franchise owners to navigate these difficulties.

TLDR

US sanctions on Lukoil affect family-run gas stations in the Northeast, causing financial and reputational challenges.

Episode

10:41
00:00:00
Lukoil is a company that supplies gasoline to consumers in the New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania region. And those
00:00:07
gas stations are run like most, with a franchisee model. But ongoing sanctions by the US against Russia over the Ukraine
00:00:15
war is having an impact on those stations, many of which end up being family run. So it's an interesting story of how small
00:00:23
business is being impacted by something half a world away, and still needs to try and survive.
00:00:30
Pleasure to be joined to discuss how they go about this by Serguei Netessine, who is a
00:00:34
Professor of Operations, Information and Decisions here at the Wharton School. Serguei, great to catch up with you. How are you, sir?
00:00:42
Very good. Thank you for having me, Dan. Thank you, sir. Well, like, as I said at the top, a
00:00:48
lot of these stations are family run, so it has to be quite the challenge being caught in the middle of all of this.
00:00:56
Yes, absolutely. This is a very unfortunate situation where, you know, Lukoil's US footprint was built largely through
00:01:06
acquisitions of existing station networks. First it was Getty stations, and then there was some Mobile, Exxon Mobile
00:01:14
portfolio, followed by gradual rebranding. So today you have local operators running community businesses under a
00:01:22
brand whose ownership is a geopolitical flashpoint. So that's what's going on.
00:01:27
What is the relationship, then, that these local stations have with the larger company? How does that work out?
00:01:35
Well, many of those stations are family run, locally operated businesses caught in the middle, really. They're kind of like a
00:01:44
collateral damage, because they are franchised locations, and sanctions imposed on Lukoil, they really target ownership and
00:01:54
control. But the shock travels straight to family run franchisees who have, really, nothing to do with with the
00:02:02
ownership of the franchise. Right. And it's important to note that while these stations are from a Russian company, the gasoline
00:02:13
from, what I read, from these stores, is gas that's refined here in the US, not in Russia.
00:02:20
So those people that may have a concern of thinking that they are supporting Russia, that may
00:02:25
not necessarily be the case. That is correct, yes. So the molecule— molecules in the tank
00:02:33
may be American, but the reputational risk is about the logo, not the refinery. And this is what a lot of customers
00:02:41
see. They see the logo, and the logo is from the Russian company, and that's why they often stop buying gasoline, even—
00:02:50
even before any sanctions. Even, you know, above and beyond the effect of the direct sanctions imposed on Lukoil.
00:02:56
And so the financial side of this for the companies is a challenge because they have certain relationships set up in
00:03:06
terms of how they can bank the level of credit, where they can get credit from, and it's a challenge for them right now.
00:03:12
Exactly, Dan. And the problem is that stations depend on credit card payments or debit card payments. And typical franchisee
00:03:23
in this business gets something like 85 to 90% of their sales from cards. And cards are controlled by the bank, of
00:03:34
course. And when the bank sees a risk— like in this case, a risk of sanctions— they just stop accepting payments. And so
00:03:44
customers come to the station, payments are not accepted. On the other hand, the franchisee agreement corners the owner as
00:03:52
well. Because when you are in a franchising agreement, you have to use certain equipment, you have to use certain bank. You
00:04:00
have to use certain branding. And so these owners cannot even go to a different bank and say, "Hey, you know, my bank is not
00:04:09
accepting payments. Let me go with a different bank." They are squeezed from both sides. There is a compliance risk on one side
00:04:17
and then the contract default risk on the other side. So that's— that's a very, very unfortunate situation.
00:04:24
And so if they wanted to go to another bank just to be able to solve their problems temporarily, what are some of
00:04:31
the potential repercussions of doing that? Well, they would violate, potentially, rules of the franchising agreement.
00:04:41
And that typically means they can get sued by the— by Lukoil, by the parent company itself. I mean, I'm not giving
00:04:50
legal advice here. You know, I would definitely want to read their agreement and probably consult with a— with a lawyer and
00:04:56
understand how the agreement works. But typically, that's what happens. You— you would violate the rules of the
00:05:02
agreement, and potentially just lose entire franchising unit that you have. So then for the company, Lukoil, I guess, one
00:05:14
of the potential solutions might be if they were to sell their assets to another owner, then. Correct?
00:05:21
Yes, that would be probably the best solution for everyone. Divestment is kind of a cleanest structural solution I can think
00:05:28
of. But the problem is, with timelines and approvals, that could be slow because of the sanctions. Because OFAC
00:05:37
explicitly addressed this, and they said that, look, the general license that they give, it authorizes negotiations and
00:05:48
all kinds of contingent contracts, plus due diligence, but it doesn't authorize the actual sale. So when it comes to
00:05:55
sale, it still has to be approved. So that probably means extra months and months that are going— that are going to take place
00:06:04
between the agreement is reached and then the approval is gained. So policy-wise, the sale is a nice off ramp, but it's a
00:06:12
regulated off ramp. So— - Right. It would be a slow off ramp. But if you did have something like that occur, I would assume
00:06:20
most likely that— well, I can't assume it, but would there need to be a rebrand of the stores?
00:06:27
Practically, yes. Yeah. I think in most cases, either immediately or part of the sale. And there are multiple reasons.
00:06:36
There is a commercial reason. You want to avoid kind of a customer seeing this sign, and the reputational drag is there. But
00:06:46
then there is also compliance, operational reason. So banking and payment partners will be more comfortable. And then there
00:06:55
is a contract reason. Usually rebranding is required as a part of termination of the agreement and sale of assets. So even
00:07:03
if the fuel supply would stay the same, most likely, rebranding can be the difference between this political headline and a
00:07:11
local corner store. A corner store. What, potentially, then, is the path that these local store
00:07:18
owners need to consider right now? I mean, as you said before, they're kind of stuck in the middle here, and it doesn't
00:07:26
feel like they have a lot of options at this moment. No, unfortunately not. And, you know, they kind of should have
00:07:32
seen this coming. I'm frankly surprised that Lukoil wasn't sanctioned earlier. You know, it took so long. You know, the war
00:07:41
has been going on for such a long time, and Lukoil is clearly supporting the Russian government in the war. There
00:07:49
are a few things you can do. You can try to find redundant payment options. You know, try to encourage multiple processors
00:07:58
to accept payments, for example, and hopefully there are some banks that are not as worried about sanctions. So that's kind
00:08:06
of in the mediate, in the mediate term, to investigate. Then you really want transparent customer messaging. I would
00:08:14
have— I would have, everywhere, "Locally-owned, employs local staff, fuel supply through US distribution," and so on, to just
00:08:23
help customers understand that, you know, this is really— has nothing to do— it doesn't have much to do with a Russian
00:08:30
company business. This won't solve sanctions, but it can soften this brand avoidance disturbance. And then you
00:08:40
probably want to engage in some trade associations, start talking with each other, and push for practical guidance from
00:08:49
OFAC and so on. So then you can get engaged into some medium term, you know, seek compliance pathways and negotiate some kind
00:08:58
of franchising relief. That would involve some kind of a consultations with a lawyer, probably.
00:09:03
How much is this really a story of kind of the nature of how small businesses have to deal with, you know, some very unique
00:09:12
situations that may come out of the blue, that they may not have expected when they, you know, wanted to be an owner of a
00:09:18
business like this? Yeah, it's— it's an— it's unfortunate in this case, that
00:09:25
the policy goal is to cut off sanctioned cash flows, right? So you want to cut off cash flows to Russia, not to wipe out
00:09:34
American family businesses, right? So, of course, I think OFAC realized this a little bit late, and kind of created this
00:09:45
solution where they allowed stations still to operate, but then there is still a backlash, because customers see the brand
00:09:53
and, you know, they kind of perceive it as not a good brand. So there are, unfortunately, no great solutions
00:10:03
right now. Really, this acquisition would be the best. So it should be encouraged. It should be made relatively fast,
00:10:10
because this really would be a good outcome for everyone. Serguei, great to talk to you again.
00:10:15
Thanks very much. All the best. Yeah, thank you. Thank you, Dan. - You got it. Good to see you, as usual.
00:10:21
Absolutely. Serguei Netessine, who is Professor of Operations, Information and Decisions here at the Wharton School.

Episode Highlights

  • Impact of Sanctions on Local Businesses
    Ongoing US sanctions against Russia affect family-run Lukoil gas stations in the US.
    “It's an unfortunate situation for local operators caught in the middle.”
    @ 00m 56s
    February 20, 2026
  • Potential Solutions for Lukoil
    Divesting assets may be the best solution for Lukoil amidst sanctions.
    “Divestment is kind of the cleanest structural solution I can think of.”
    @ 05m 21s
    February 20, 2026

Episode Quotes

  • They're kind of like collateral damage.
    How Geopolitics Is Hitting Local Gas Stations
  • This is really has nothing to do with a Russian company business.
    How Geopolitics Is Hitting Local Gas Stations

Key Moments

  • Collateral Damage01:40
  • Reputational Risk02:37
  • Franchisee Challenges03:56
  • Slow Off Ramp06:12
  • Limited Options07:26

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown