00:00:00
Why then designate them a supply chain risk? Why not just abandon them, move on, use the other vendors? Like why take
00:00:06
this kind of punitive action? >> I don't view it as punitive. And I'll
00:00:09
tell you why. It's if their model has this policy bias, let's call it, based
00:00:15
on their constitution, their culture, their people, and so on. I don't want Loheed Martin using their model to
00:00:22
design weapons for me. I don't want the people who are designing the things that
00:00:26
go into the the componentry to come to me because if that poison if you believe the risk of poisoning threat yes it can
00:00:35
enter into any part of the defense enterprise but it's just the defense enterprise. So Boeing wants to use
00:00:42
anthropic to build commercial jets have at it. Boeing wants to use it to build fighter jets. I can't have that because
00:00:49
I don't trust what the outputs may be because they're so wedded to their own
00:00:53
policy preferences. I worried about them shutting off our system at a moment of need. If you don't want your stuff to be
00:00:59
used for department war stuff, you shouldn't be selling to the Department of War.
00:01:03
>> Pretty straightforward. >> It's in the name. It's in the name.