Search Captions & Ask AI

JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024

September 10, 2024 / 46:06

This episode features JD Vance, vice presidential candidate, discussing his political journey, views on innovation, immigration, and the economy. Key topics include his military service, experiences in the tech industry, and thoughts on Donald Trump's presidency.

JD Vance shares insights on his transition from a critic of Trump to his running mate, emphasizing the importance of understanding both sides of political issues. He reflects on how media narratives can distort public perception and the need for honest dialogue.

The conversation touches on immigration policy, where Vance argues for a focus on legal immigration and the need to address illegal immigration effectively. He discusses the economic implications of immigration and the importance of prioritizing American citizens.

Vance also addresses the relationship with China, advocating for a balanced approach that fosters American manufacturing while maintaining necessary trade relations. He highlights the importance of energy independence and reducing regulatory burdens to stimulate economic growth.

The episode concludes with Vance expressing gratitude for the opportunity to share his views and the importance of engaging in meaningful political discourse.

TLDR

JD Vance discusses his political journey, immigration policy, and economic growth strategies as he runs for vice president.

Episode

46:06
00:00:00
this speaker is not on the program not on the program but I did notice there was a little bit of security here
00:00:05
today little extra security this is your saxs red meat moment yes all right here
00:00:11
we go little red meat for Sachs uh please welcome me in joining vice presidential candidate jie
00:00:20
Vance let your winners ride Rainman David and instead we open source it to the fans and they've just gone crazy
00:00:32
[Music] with hey guys man good to see you man how you doing time all right see you hey
00:00:50
guys welcome so Zach is GNA introduce you welcome to the Lions who who's here with us Z well do we do we actually need
00:00:57
a a big introduction here but I'll I'll give you I'll give a few um those of you
00:01:01
who are really bad at context clues I'm JD Vance I'm running for vice president and normally he's he's beside
00:01:09
his wife Usha but now you get that's right she's at like the tarpits or whatever yeah yeah oh yeah we brought a
00:01:15
three kids out here so she wanted to take and see some fossil stuff so they'll have fun good I'll say a couple
00:01:21
of things about JD because um he's a friend I think what what I think um really made me want to support JD for
00:01:31
for Senate and also for the VP position is that I think he represents two you could almost say
00:01:37
contradictions uh back in 2003 when JD graduated from high school uh you know this was after the Twin Towers had come
00:01:44
down and we gotten involved in the Iraq War he was gung-ho to go fight America's
00:01:49
enemies and he enlisted in the Marine Corps and went off uh to serve in in the Middle East eventually he came to
00:01:56
realize that that war was a mistake and I thought that really represents uh one of the traits
00:02:03
that we really want in in a vice president or someone next to the president uh which is that he had the
00:02:09
patriotism and the courage to go serve America but also the wisdom to realize when America shouldn't get involved in a
00:02:16
war so I want to [Applause] just the the other uh like I said almost contradiction that JD represents is that
00:02:29
he had worked in the tech industry he had been a a venture capitalist he had been in rooms like this and he
00:02:36
understands what it takes to make America a more Innovative place at the same time he comes from a part of the
00:02:45
the Midwest Appalachia that's a very poor part of the country and did not grow up in a privileged uh environment
00:02:52
at all and he still remembers those people and he represents those people and I think his ability to understand
00:02:59
both parts of the country makes him uh I'd say a pretty unique political figure so with that let me stop and do you want
00:03:05
to react to any of that uh well you know first of all thanks to all for having me
00:03:11
I've been a big fan of the Pod for a while I think my first appearance so it's good to be with you you know I the
00:03:15
only thing I'll say to that David is I I do think there is a deep connection between the the poverty that I saw
00:03:21
growing up and the fact that our entire economy is just less Innovative than we pretend that it is and you know I know
00:03:27
you know Peter teal and Tyler K other folks have talked about this but if you look at the real innovation of the
00:03:32
American economy it's been in the world of software if you look at where the economy has been most stagnant it's been
00:03:39
in basically the heavily regulated parts of the economy which is where 90% of the
00:03:43
people that I represent in the Senate and 80% of the people that I hope to represent as their vice president
00:03:48
actually make their living run their business and go to work every single day and I think that you know when I think
00:03:54
about tech one of the things I'd like us to do is broaden the aperture a little bit and think about innovation not just
00:04:00
in software but innovation in transportation and Logistics and Innovation uh in energy and the whole
00:04:05
Suite of things because unless our economy is actually technologically Innovative then the stagnant economy is
00:04:12
is fundamentally like the worst thing and I think a lot of actually America's pathologies right now stem from the fact
00:04:19
that we feel like we live in a very zero some country because in some ways we do
00:04:24
right when when when the econom is growing four 5 6% a year then Democrats can kind of get what they want
00:04:29
Republicans kind can kind of get what they want and it all makes sense if the economy is growing between 0er and 1% a
00:04:35
year then I think it makes the whole society and our political system a much much much more insane and I think it's
00:04:41
kind of a subtext of what's been going on in this country for the last 30 years um let me start by going back a little
00:04:47
bit I think three of us um initially would have been described sort of like you know non-trump people yeah um and in
00:04:57
different ways and shapes and form we were all V about it because of what was presented to us through the filter of
00:05:03
the media and we've all gone through an evolution in large part by meeting the person and this is the first time
00:05:09
actually where a presidential candidate I've known and I've kind of known a vice
00:05:13
presidental candidate in this case as well get try you know they try to Corner you and paint you in a certain way can
00:05:19
you just talk about what you realized and the person that you got to know and what it says about what we need to do so
00:05:26
that we don't get manipulated yeah so first of all when Biden was running against Trump one of the things the
00:05:32
media tried to do is to say well you know you have these two guys who are a little bit older than average and both
00:05:36
of them clearly aren't fully with it and I would hear the media talk about Biden
00:05:41
like this and then talk about Trump like this and it's like guys Donald Trump remembers exactly what I said about him
00:05:47
n and a half years ago to the minute to the day to the exact line like trust me his memory is 100% there uh even if it
00:05:54
would be in more more in my interest if it wasn't and you know what what what changed for me I mean two things I mean
00:06:00
one Chim you just sort of hit on this is a lot of the things the Press said about
00:06:05
Donald Trump and says about Donald Trump are just straight up Fabrications and so
00:06:08
if you think the Press is like biased that's one thing but if you think the Press is fundamentally trying to tell
00:06:14
you the truth even if it's in a bias way and then you realize that like Donald Trump never called white supremacist
00:06:19
very fine people after Charlottesville a total fabrication of the American Media
00:06:23
it's like okay what other things am I hearing about Donald Trump that are actually not true right the second thing
00:06:29
is you know and we talked about this a little bit last night but look if you go back to the date of my or the year of my
00:06:36
birth which is 1984 there's this chart that's really interesting and it tracks corporate profits the wages of workers
00:06:43
and the size of government and for pretty much my entire life the wages of workers were stagnant corporate profits
00:06:50
were going up and the size of government was going up and there was a 4-year period where the wages of workers
00:06:55
outpace the size of government corporate profits it's the four years that Trump was president and I think that we have
00:07:01
to like give some credit to where it's due the policies actually work and if you go into the presidency
00:07:08
saying I don't think Donald Trump's going to be a good president and then lo and behold he's the best president at
00:07:13
least in a generation it's like okay time to change my mind admit to myself but also to all the people who listen to
00:07:19
me I was wrong about Donald Trump he was a hell of a good president of course I'm
00:07:22
running as his running mate I think he'll do it again let's flip it around now what what does it say about him that
00:07:28
he I mean how's that process of saying JD you said this yes I did I changed my mind I then but then he has to change
00:07:34
his mind so that says something so talk us about that you know I think the the president one thing I'll say about him
00:07:40
is the again the media perception of Donald Trump is that he's like this deeply AG grieved guy who holds really
00:07:48
terrible grudges the actual reality of Donald Trump is that yeah he remembers what you said about him because it's
00:07:54
like part of the inputs that he takes as he tries to evaluate a human being but most most importantly he's asking like
00:08:01
what what can you do now how can you help the country now how can you help me as I try to help the country now and I
00:08:07
think for whatever complicated set of factors he decided that I was the guy who could help him the most um but no I
00:08:12
mean it's it's it is interesting the perception of him as this guy who holds grudges he selected a guy who was very
00:08:19
much a Critic of his back in 2015 as his running mate clearly something doesn't make sense and I think that what doesn't
00:08:25
make sense is this idea that Trump is more motivated by grievance than he is by the public interest he's actually
00:08:30
much more motivated by the public interest that's the truth that's awesome you're um thanks for coming of course um
00:08:37
you're going to replace um Mike Pence uh as I hope so yeah as uh GNA be a close election but um if you
00:08:47
do um Mike Pence um your new boss Trump is a little upset at Mike Pence because Mike Pence refused to uh overturn in the
00:08:57
election results and um if you were in that same position what would you do would you have overturned
00:09:04
the election results well I think it's let me take itue with the premise a little bit Jason because I don't think
00:09:09
the argument was Mike Pence could overturn the election results I think the argument was that Mike Pence could
00:09:15
have done more whether you agree or disagree Mike Pence could have done more to sort of surface some of the problems
00:09:22
in the election would you have not certified the El well I I think that what I would have done I mean look I I I
00:09:28
happen to think that there were issues back in 2020 particularly in Pennsylvania even you know some of the
00:09:32
courts that refused to throw out certified ballots did say that there were ballots that were cast in an
00:09:37
illegal way they just refused to actually decertify the election results in Pennsylvania do I think that we could
00:09:43
have had a much more rational conversation about how to ensure that only legal ballots are cast yes and do I
00:09:50
think that Mike Pence could have played a better role yes but I again the the the two premises that I take issue one
00:09:55
is one pence was not asked to overturn the election he couldn't have but two the reason asked to not certify
00:10:02
it sure so would you have certified it last year for the third again I would have asked the states to submit
00:10:07
alternative slates of electors and let the country have the debate about what actually matters and what kind of an
00:10:13
election that we have states to be clear I would have asked the states to submit
00:10:18
alternative slate to that's that's what I would have done again I've said that publicly many times but again Jason the
00:10:24
important part is we would have had a big debate and it doesn't necessarily mean the results would have been any
00:10:29
different different but we at least would have had the debate in Pennsylvania and Georgia about how to
00:10:33
better have a rational election system where legal ballots are cast and again I I you know look I have no personal
00:10:40
problem with Mike Pence I've never really talked to him um but I think that the idea that the reason Mike Pence
00:10:45
isn't on board with Donald Trump is over the election of 2020 that's the other thing I want to take issue with Jason
00:10:50
because I think in reality that if Donald Trump wanted to start a nuclear war with Russia Mike Pence would be at
00:10:54
the front of the line endorsing him right now and fundamentally the reason the old guard of the Republican party
00:10:59
hates Donald Trump it's not because of January the 6 2021 whatever your views on it it's because Donald Trump doesn't
00:11:06
think that we should start stupid Wars in foreign countries and that's why they all hate
00:11:10
him can I I have a fall on that let me continue my line of questioning then I'll give it to you because I want to
00:11:17
hear JD's since he's here I've heard yours many times um so uh how many how many followups how many follows are you
00:11:24
going to have about January 6 we 2 minutes talking about I want to hear David especially if he gets me out of
00:11:28
answering so I think we've you've had like three follow-ups on on J first of all freeberg
00:11:36
you never got a chance to ask your question I want to talk about let's let's talk about January 6 for the next
00:11:40
45 minutes I'm sure the most important thing going on in the country right now can we talk about policy for a minute
00:11:45
that'd be great okay I'd love that I I'll just I'll just reflect back on your comment about government growth compared
00:11:53
to wage growth compared to corporate profits there's only so much Capital it gets sucked up somewhere right there's
00:11:58
competing interests that suck Su it up the government is a competing interest that sucks up Capital fundamentally the
00:12:03
government has been successful in sucking up capital and ultimately the government has been proven time and
00:12:07
again to be the least efficient way to grow the economy of allocating capital allocators or labor and um Trump has
00:12:17
made this commentary that Elon who's going to be here later today should come in and help rightsize the government
00:12:22
you've now you've now spent a few years as a senator this is my most distressing
00:12:26
issue right of all the panic attacks I have that Jason teases me about it's government spending the debt level and
00:12:33
ultimately you reach a Tipping Point I believe in democracies where the government is
00:12:37
spending uh most more people are dependent on the government than are not and that ultimately leads to a very bad
00:12:43
outcome for democracy that's how I feel and So based on what you've seen as a senator now for the last few years and
00:12:48
based on the commentary that Elon where where would you go in you know cut where
00:12:53
where's the most kind of efficiency gaining opportunity that we can kind of execute against without needing to go
00:13:00
and negotiate with Congress what's the opportunity ahead for the executive branch to rightsize government to make
00:13:06
things more efficient to hold things accountable to improve the way that the government is functioning which I think
00:13:11
ultimately leads to better economic growth and opportunity for Innovation because Capital flows to the right
00:13:15
places so I agree with you and let me just say let me say two things and I'll try to answer briefly because I know
00:13:19
there are a lot of topics that we can get through so so number one is one of the things that our government should do
00:13:24
obviously I think it should be doing less than it currently does but what it does I want it to do well
00:13:29
and most importantly I want the critical social welfare functions of our government to go to the people who
00:13:34
actually deserve to be here so as United State Senator I have asked multiple staff members I've asked officials in
00:13:40
various government departments if you take the give or take 25 million illegal aliens that are here in this country
00:13:45
right now how much money do we spend on illegal aliens every single year in this
00:13:50
country and I've gotten estimates that range between a100 billion a year to $600 billion a year and where does that
00:13:56
money come from well it comes from Healthcare benefits even though illegal aliens aren't entitled to section 8
00:14:01
housing their children are entitled to section 8 housing there's also a lot of Social Security fraud a lot of Medicare
00:14:05
fraud so one thing that we could save a lot of money on is actually focusing our
00:14:10
national interest on American citizens people who deserve to be here we'd save a lot of money that way that'd be a huge
00:14:16
7.3 trillion budget what do you estimate that impact to be well again and I'm trying to do that scene in the movie
00:14:21
Dave they go in and they just like line up like nope no or like no pulled everything off the board if you call it
00:14:25
a $ 1.7 trillion deficit right uh again it's between $100 billion to $600 billion depending on how you cut the
00:14:32
numbers now the the other thing about that just to answer your question about efficiency is I think the government
00:14:36
procurement process especially in military equipment is really broken uh if you go back to Eisenhower's warning
00:14:42
about the military industrial complex I mean I I was a seed investor in andil I imagine you guys have some andil people
00:14:47
here today um great lucky here great yeah great great chat you know one of the things that that company as as I as
00:14:55
you know I haven't talked to to the guys about the details of their business in the LA in the last few years but one of
00:15:00
the things that they founded the company on was the idea that the procurement process was broken and that is
00:15:04
definitely true in the you know we do way too much cost plus procurement and way too little actual spurring of
00:15:12
innovation and what it ends up meaning is that our equipment isn't as good as it should be and we end up spending a
00:15:17
lot more money than we should be I actually do think you could cut the American defense budget and make our
00:15:22
country stronger but you would have to make the procurement process much more efficient now that's a big thing to
00:15:27
tackle but that's what we're in this business do you pass legislation to do that I don't know that you have to pass
00:15:33
legislation but you really as a president and vice president you have to be willing to take on some very powerful
00:15:38
defense contractors and that's something that I know president Trump and I very much want to do and how would you like
00:15:42
your role as vice president to be cast differentially from how other vice presidents have have operated what would
00:15:48
your role as an individual be just speaking about I want to do all of the good things and none of the bad things
00:15:53
that's my goal as as vice president that's so the ribbon cuttings of the new federal like I mean look I mean
00:16:00
obviously joking but the the reality is that I I want to be a second set of eyes
00:16:06
and ears for the president's agenda right one of the things that was true and he will tell you this the first time
00:16:11
he was he was President of the United States is there were people in government there were people in his own
00:16:15
Administration that he was a newcomer to politics he didn't fully trust everybody
00:16:19
who was around him we want to build a team who's actually aligned on the agenda because agree or disagree with
00:16:24
Donald Trump on a specific policy issue assuming the American people make him the next president pres and I think that
00:16:29
they will that is the next president and his policy determinations should dictate
00:16:35
the executive administration of government if they don't we don't have a real democracy and by the way just not
00:16:40
to weigh back into January 6 territory like what is a bigger threat to American democracy is it that we had a big fight
00:16:46
about some of the uh some of the certification in January the 6 and of course you had some riers at the capital
00:16:52
or is it that for example The Joint Chiefs of Staff didn't obey the president of the United States on Troop
00:16:58
redeployment in Syria which actually happened during Trump's Administration like if we're going to talk about
00:17:03
threats to democracy we need the government to be responsive to the American people's elected president if
00:17:09
you don't have that you don't have a real democracy how [Applause] much a lot of this if you design it in
00:17:20
one way has to go through Congress which as we know is sclerotic and mayic nothing can happen and then the other
00:17:25
path is for you guys to go ham a little bit and say okay what can we do with executive order have you had a chance to
00:17:32
discuss if you win repositioning the focus as basically that what is the totality of everything
00:17:39
that we can do from the White House from the oval and then getting all of these and the other thing that we should talk
00:17:46
about at some point is like it's like a Avengers movie now at this point you Bobby Kennedy Elon Trump so
00:17:54
but I don't the Justice League the Justice League I I don't know which character in that Justice League I am no
00:18:00
but but the point is like you know have you had that discussion about like all right folks let's not wait for Congress
00:18:06
and get a plan ready starting day one of all the stuff that can happen through EOS or how are you thinking about this
00:18:11
well at a high level certainly you know I'm I'm one of the co-chairs of the transition team there are a few others
00:18:16
of us who are working on it you to sort of think about I mean look the way the founders set up our government whether
00:18:20
you like it or not there are certain things especially when it comes to budget and Appropriations you just have
00:18:24
to go through Congress right you fundamentally have to now I I do think that the Congress is willing to work
00:18:29
with us at least you know the first couple of years of an Administration you can largely get the budgetary and
00:18:34
Appropriations things that you need but there's a lot that you can do through EO
00:18:38
and by the way in a lot of ways I think the enlargement of the president at the expense of Congress is a bad thing but
00:18:44
fundamentally there is a lot that happens in our government purely through executive orders through EOS and yes
00:18:49
we're thinking very deliberatively about all the things that you could do through
00:18:53
EOS on day one or in the early parts of the administration and again not to make
00:18:57
this too partisan but one of the ways that that um that Biden and Harris opened up the American southern border
00:19:03
was through executive orders right it was an executive order that suspended deportations an executive order that
00:19:08
ended the remain of Mexico policy so you can screw up a lot through EOS you can also fix a lot through EOS which is
00:19:14
certainly Something That We're focused on let me um uh go in a different direction just in the last couple of
00:19:21
days um Dick Cheney endorsed KLA Harris for president and that endorsement was warmly embraced by by KLA Harris and the
00:19:29
Democrats the same people called him a war criminal like three years ago yeah well yeah I'm old enough to remember
00:19:35
back in 2008 uh Obama first beat Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary because he had opposed the Iraq War and
00:19:42
she had supported it and then he got elected president the United States and the whole country seemed to recognize
00:19:47
that the Iraq War had been a disaster it destabilized Middle East it you know I don't need to go through all the
00:19:52
litanies of of horribles that that happened from it but there seems to be a widespread recognition and like you're
00:19:58
saying Di was kind of demonized as this um like the Darth Vader Prince of Darkness type figure which I think
00:20:05
basically was right I mean he was the principal architect of of the Iraq War and now I find myself agreeing with
00:20:10
everything the Democrats said in 2008 about right total coincidence on a separate track a few weeks ago we had
00:20:17
Bobby Kennedy endorse uh Donald Trump so you now have a dynamic where the bush Republicans are now Harris Democrats and
00:20:27
the Kennedy Democrats are now Trump Republicans clearly something big is happening in our politics here can you
00:20:34
explain this realignment how do you see it yeah I mean look uh one way think about it is that we traded Dick Cheney
00:20:40
for Bobby Kennedy and that's an upgrade I'll take every single day right look I mean one way of
00:20:49
understanding is you have to ask yourself who is benefited and who is harmed from the last 30 years of the
00:20:55
bipartisan consistence in this country right so um you want to talk about a manufacturing policy that I think
00:21:00
promoted the offshoring of millions of good American manufacturing jobs and in the in the process by the way made made
00:21:06
us less self-reliant as a country uh that really benefited people like Dick Cheney and kamla Harris and their donors
00:21:13
it didn't benefit the people that I serve in the state of Ohio okay uh if you ask yourself who actually went off
00:21:18
and fought these ridiculous Wars it was very often working in Middle Class kids in communities like mine it wasn't the
00:21:24
family of our current leadership class by and large though of course they're exception
00:21:29
and you go through each of these issues and what you find is increasingly Republicans are the party of working in
00:21:34
Middle Class people you know Bobby Kennedy has talked about this a lot and I think he puts it better than I ever
00:21:39
could but that you know you go back even 30 years ago and Approximately 80% of the counties that represent sorry 80% of
00:21:47
the wealth in American counties went in places that voted Republican and about 20% of the wealth went to places that
00:21:54
voted Democrat now it's 70% of the wealth goes for Democrat and about 30% of the wealth goes for republicans and
00:22:01
you saw this in a big way I mean just one illustration is I believe that in 2012 Wall Street which I think Wall
00:22:07
Street fundamentally has been the main beneficiary of globalization of of a lot of the policies that I I pushed back
00:22:12
against and criticize over the last 30 years Wall Street went 3 to one for Romney over Obama in 2012 I believe they
00:22:19
went 4 to one for um for Clinton over Trump in 2016 and then like nine to one for Biden over Trump in 201 20 so there
00:22:29
was a massive shift in who makes up these parties wealthy people direct their money to Democrats is what incre
00:22:35
increasingly wealthy people direct their money to Democrats working in Middle Class People direct their money to
00:22:40
Republicans why do you think that is j i i i again because I think their policies
00:22:43
have benefited look the the the unip party the kamla harrises and Dick Cheney their parties have benefited a certain
00:22:50
group of people those people are increasingly Democrats uh Donald Trump has been pushing back against that
00:22:55
consensus in his party in his policies I think benefit the majority of the country so increasingly I think the
00:23:00
working middle class heart of the country is going for Republicans like another another spin on this cuz I know
00:23:05
we're you know focused on Tech in this conference is Big Tech has become increasingly pro-democrat little Tech
00:23:11
has become increasingly Pro Republican right so if you're an upstart if you're in crypto if you're if you're like a
00:23:16
small AI company I think you're much more likely to be pro- Republican if you're a monopolist in big Tech I mean
00:23:22
look at Facebook Google how they're how they're how they're putting their resources it's much much more Pro
00:23:28
Democrats so there are a lot of different spins on it but fundamentally I think the people who've benefited from
00:23:33
the American decline are becoming Democrats the people who have suffered from it and are pushing back against it
00:23:39
their Republicans I have a followup question on that JD which is um you were a venture capitalist uh for a period and
00:23:46
Lena Khan has essentially taken m&a off the table um you well know that if we can't get those singles and doubles in
00:23:53
the industry um it kind of freezes the industry and we have a problem with returns which then is having creating a
00:24:00
a secondary order problem where we can't get LPS to put more money into funds because we're not getting those returns
00:24:06
what's the proper way to look at m&a because you're you want to break up big Tech from what I understand and you have
00:24:12
a major problem with big Tech you mentioned little Tech what's the proper m&a architecture you know to to balance
00:24:21
those two uh goals there yeah so this is obviously very complicated like Jason you probably understand this better than
00:24:26
I do but as as Somebody by the way who's defended Lena Khan against some of her critics from the right I think what Lena
00:24:33
Khan fundamentally gets correct is that big Tech really is a threat it's a threat to free speech it's increasing
00:24:39
oligarchic it controls too much of what we're allowed to say and also it controls a lot of the ways in which
00:24:44
capital gets invested in these various ecosystems but where I think Len lenon goes wrong is that you're exactly right
00:24:51
like you need the singles and doubles you need sometimes a medium-sized company to buy a smaller company for 300
00:24:58
millon right that liquidates Founders that gives the Venture fund some money to go
00:25:02
back into the system and I think that you know not I don't know her super well but my basic read on Lena is that she is
00:25:09
so anti-monopoly as sort of a baseline bias and anti that becomes anti-g and acquisition as a baseline bias that
00:25:17
Google buying YouTube is a much much different thing from a$2 billion market cap Healthcare company buying a $500
00:25:23
million Market healthare company and I think that we have to sort of draw a very big distinction between little
00:25:28
little Tech and big Tech and look I'm going to keep on making that argument both in public and private to Lena and
00:25:33
hopefully she comes around to rvw a little bit because I do think some of her ideas on big Tech are right I think
00:25:37
a good place for us to Pivot would be the border and just talking about this issue more from first principles when
00:25:43
President Trump came on the podcast we talked about hey maybe really talented people we should recruit them to our
00:25:50
country and give them green cards um but very quickly um your group walked that back a bit it's such a political hot
00:25:58
potato and it doesn't seem to me that it needs to be but you spent a lot of time
00:26:01
in government now why can't politicians just do what 80% of the country wants which is allow very talented people into
00:26:10
the country close the border and make it like a a more point-based system like Canada Australia and everybody else like
00:26:18
why is this so weaponized by both of your parties well I think the reason why it's so difficult right now and I mean
00:26:25
look generally I agree that okay we're going to let some immigrants in we want them to be high Talent high quality
00:26:31
people you don't want to let a large number of illegal aliens in obviously that you know that that is that's
00:26:36
president Trump's view but I I think that the reason why it's so broken down right now is because you have 25 million
00:26:41
illegal aliens in this country and you like you can't fix what I would call the minor or sort of less important
00:26:48
immigration question until you fix the real problem and part of that goes back by the way to the way in which the
00:26:54
system got broken in the first place so Ronald Reagan of course great governor of California
00:26:58
a great president but Reagan did in 1986 a massive amnesty program where in some
00:27:04
ways he was trying to do exactly what you're talking about fix the problem of people who are already here make sure
00:27:09
that our immigration system is more proskill but also close down the border and what happened is we got all the
00:27:15
amnesty but we didn't get the closing down of the border and so in order to do anything I think meaningful on
00:27:21
immigration policy meaning legal immigration policy you've got to close down the border and establish some basic
00:27:27
order and and we go back to First principles here I I think that people who are generally I mean look this is
00:27:32
I'm sure a very diverse crowd and I'm sure there are a lot of immigrants In This Crowd legal immigrants uh hopefully
00:27:38
um I'm married to the daughter I'm married to the daughter of legal immigrants to this country and I of
00:27:43
course love not just my wife but the whole extended family I do think they've they brought a lot areal immigrants yeah
00:27:49
um and but but but here's the thing when you allow 25 million people into this country it breaks down the entire social
00:27:57
compact right so think about this okay you're down on your luck you lost your job you get unemployment insurance
00:28:02
you're really down on your luck you need food assistance from the federal government I believe as a conservative
00:28:08
that part of being in the same American Family whether your family's been here for a generation or 10 Generations is
00:28:14
that we support people who are down on the luck we don't want a cradle to grave welfare state but we want to support
00:28:19
people we don't want kids who are dying because of starvation because of no fault of their own we want to promote
00:28:25
some basic fairness and we want to help people out when times get tough but you can't do that if you extend that
00:28:32
generosity to tens of millions of people who can't even be here in in the first place and I think that what what kamla
00:28:38
Harris has done at the border it's not just bad economically it's not just bad for Public Safety she has eroded the
00:28:44
very foundation of the social contract in this country and we talk about division in our politics and kamla has
00:28:50
this ridiculous slogan we're not going back the reason why politics is so divided is because she has turned
00:28:56
American citizens against one another while she's placed theit the the interest of illegal aliens above
00:29:02
American citizens you want to turn the page and get back to Common American citizenship stop putting illegal aliens
00:29:08
to the front of the line of American citizens is the motivation do you do you believe the
00:29:17
motivation is endless empathy or is it as simple as we want new Democratic voters or is there a kind of not
00:29:29
publicly spoken about economic argument about bringing wages down having economic growth having new buyers in the
00:29:35
economy that there's some benefit despite the1 to 600 billion and I'll add another one guilt yeah it's the endless
00:29:42
empathy aspect yeah yeah I mean empathy is different than guilt it's all of these things right I mean so so let me
00:29:47
tell you a brief story and this goes back to my my changing my mind on Donald Trump I was probably it's probably 2017
00:29:53
2018 I was at a business conference and I happened to be seated next to one of the largest Hotel chain CEOs in America
00:29:59
and my wife was there and we talk about this as the Monopoly story because the guy is just going off maybe it had too
00:30:05
much to drink he's going off about how Donald Trump's immigration policies have for had forced him to raise the wages of
00:30:11
his workers and I was like oh that's an interesting fact like explain more about
00:30:15
this sir please I W understand and he said well because we can hire a lot of immigrants and frankly we can hire a lot
00:30:21
of legal immigrants under the table and we can't do that because there are fewer
00:30:25
legal immigrants so we have to pay our American citizen workers more money and I'm like oh that sounds pretty good
00:30:30
actually isn't that like what we want is for people to be earning higher wages for doing a good job so there's
00:30:36
definitely an economic piece of it but I also think I mean look this is this is chilled out a little bit partially
00:30:42
because we're in election year if KLA Harris won I think it would come back with a vengeance but think about all
00:30:46
these like ridiculous land acknowledgements right where people say well you know I want to acknowledge that
00:30:51
this be belonged to like this tribe before I was here and if you genuinely think that you have to acknowledge a
00:30:59
Native American tribe from 300 years ago then one attitude that comes along with
00:31:03
this is why can I control it all who comes into the country right I have no right there's this basic I think this is
00:31:09
the empathy it's the guilt it's sort of all these things but all structural Norms degrade exactly I I have no right
00:31:15
to say who comes into my community and I think again it's it's deranged but I think that's part of it I think the
00:31:21
economic piece of it is part of it it's certainly a vote argument I mean Democrats will say this of course
00:31:25
Republicans are accused of racism for just repeating what Democrats have said when somebody like Chuck Schumer says
00:31:32
well you know we're going to have an emerging Democratic majority because we're going to have all these new
00:31:36
immigrants and all the old Americans well they're going to vote for Republicans but we're going to replace
00:31:41
them with a bunch of new people who vote for Democrats it's like that's pretty sick but again if you call it out you're
00:31:46
somehow a racist even though Chuck Schumer is himself calling it out as if it were a good thing so I just want to
00:31:51
ask on a different topic now thank you for talking about the Border um can I just have one final on this topic okay
00:31:57
goad is um your plan is to deport tens of millions of these people tell us how that will happen practically how are you
00:32:05
going to take million of people put them in cuffs drag them out while people have
00:32:08
their cell phones out recording this or is that just Trump being Trump well Jason
00:32:14
it's I like it you like the balance in the podcast yeah I do I do though In fairness JD told me JD told me
00:32:28
ask the hard questions please I want to address them head on you did say that nothing's I think Jason should be on the
00:32:33
left and David should be on my right appropriately where am I he's been pulling me to the right I'll it's funny
00:32:40
he didn't have any of these hard questions for Reed Hoffman I don't know why SX Jason wait do you want me to leave
00:32:49
the left and go to the right I'm on the left right now but I could go right okay yeah I guess it
00:32:55
depends on perspective my perspective here but you know Jason if if the if the VC
00:33:00
thing doesn't work out you'd make a great panelist at CNN so back but I um no I by the way I love this and I like I
00:33:11
I genuinely think like this is what a person who wants to be your Vice President should actually do is answer
00:33:16
some tough question I do give you credit for that that you will face the hard question so back to the question tell me
00:33:21
about dragging millions of people out of the country Jason here here's why I find
00:33:24
this question a little off and I will answer it but it's like somebody who comes to me and
00:33:30
I'm like eating my lunch and they say look that sandwich is 10 times the size of your mouth how are you possibly going
00:33:35
to eat that whole sandwich and it's like well I'm going to take a first bite and
00:33:39
then I'm going to take a second bite and I'm going to take a third bite and eventually the problem's going to be
00:33:43
look you start out with the million people who are what we call criminal migrants people who have committed
00:33:49
violent crimes in some form or another get them out of our country yes handcuff those people and force them out of the
00:33:54
country but you also do other things simultaneously first of all you stop the bleeding right you undo KLA Harris's
00:34:01
policies that open the southern Border in the first place I've got a piece of legislation in the United States Senate
00:34:06
uh that we've got a lot of colleagues who have signed up for it which would tax remittances right because we know a
00:34:11
lot of people are earning money and then sending it back to Central America where
00:34:15
wherever they came from if you end that practice then you have a lot of people who go backck willingly I think you
00:34:19
ought to make it harder for people to hire illegal labor as opposed to American citizens you tick through these
00:34:25
things and I do think that you know that's the sandwich approach to this is you try to take it one step at a time
00:34:31
but the most important thing and I think the deportation Focus again it is important because we're eventually we
00:34:37
are going to deport people but the most important thing is to stop the bleeding you've got to stop the millions of
00:34:43
people flowing across the southern border every single year it happened because of KLA Harris's policies it's
00:34:48
going to stop when Donald Trump is President let me ask a national security question
00:34:53
yeah there's a lot of videos elon's gone down there Bobby Kennedy has gone down there you've gone down there sure and
00:35:00
the interdictions are not necessarily coming from countries in Central and South America anymore they're coming
00:35:05
from places in you know near around near Asia and a lot of places that you wouldn't normally think people coming
00:35:11
from Middle East Etc from a national security perspective what do we think is happening yeah why is that happening
00:35:18
yeah so well part of the reason it's happening is it's not Hondurans necessarily
00:35:23
it's it's Iranians it's it's people from you know all over Asia Africa look if if you look at
00:35:30
this that is the open door right so if you want to come to this country that is the open door and God knows why some of
00:35:35
them want to be here I mean you know given what's going on in the Middle East I do worry about military age males from
00:35:40
Iran coming into this country through the American southern border um but you know I actually asked a border patrol
00:35:46
agent about this uh on one of my visits and you know great guy was actually kind
00:35:52
of heartbroken because he signed up to protect his country and he's a relatively recent immigrant I could tell
00:35:57
that that by his accent this guy's like very nervous and very heartbroken about the fact that he can't do his job and he
00:36:02
told me this story and I you know I feel like an idiot in hindsight because he's
00:36:06
like we we have a guy who came in here I asked the guy like you why do you think
00:36:09
this guy's Iranian and he said well because he came through and he said that he was Mexican and I was like well
00:36:15
couldn't he have been Mexican he said well he didn't speak Spanish like oh that's a tell you knowy Mexico legal
00:36:20
alien doesn't speak Spanish that's that's probably a pretty significant tell but it it's it's happening because
00:36:25
this is what KLA Harris has done she's created this massive Gap in our national security and people are taking advantage
00:36:31
of it it's really not that surprising J let me just ask you um one more foreign policy question um on China so there's a
00:36:38
balancing act with China but the rhetoric is that's our enemy there's going to be a cold war the CH the the
00:36:45
the the structural relationship that the United States has with China is a very kind of codependent relationship they
00:36:52
buy our bonds I guess they're selling them off now uh we we buy a lot of product from them it allows us to go
00:36:57
into a Walmart and get you know $40 scooters for our kids or $20 scooters for our kids the technology industry is
00:37:05
deeply dependent on a supply chain coming from China there's a great commercial interdependency with China
00:37:10
they have historically been a very important partner to the United States in our economic prosperity and I know
00:37:16
the argument about hollowing out the middle class and so on because of moving everything offshore to China but you how
00:37:22
do we rip that Band-Aid off and not cause massive problems with INF how do we not um you know Drive the cost
00:37:31
of everything up by taring things that are coming in from China what's the the way forward with China is it necessarily
00:37:38
A deeply kind of divisive cold war or is there a path here that allows us to maintain a balanced trading relationship
00:37:46
and and kind of a peaceful transition with with China as they continue to to build up their kind of capabilities
00:37:52
economically and um with energy which I think is one of the biggest drivers for their success well so so there's a lot
00:37:57
there and let me try to sort of take a few pieces of it cuz I know we're relatively short on time so so number
00:38:02
one is the energy piece of it's is very important part of the way that you reshore American manufacturing is that
00:38:06
you open up American Energy it matters for crypto it matters for AI you've got to open up American energy or you're
00:38:12
never going to have whether it's the next generation of manufactured goods or the past Generations you've got to open
00:38:17
up American Energy okay that's number one number two is look I I don't want to go to war with China I think it would be
00:38:22
hugely destructive but I do think that we have to reshore more American manufacturing and you one of the weird
00:38:28
things about China if you think about past eras of developing nations right so go back to like when the UK was the most
00:38:35
advanced economy in the world and America was a developing Nation well one of the things that happened is that like
00:38:40
Capital was flowing from the UK into the United States right from the developed into the developing Nation what's really
00:38:47
weird about China is that it's like Americans borrow money from Chinese peasants to then buy the things the
00:38:54
Chinese peasants are making for us right so it's not just the the goods flow that's jacked up it's the capital flows
00:39:00
that are jacked up and I really think that the next you know Donald Trump is going to be the next president of United
00:39:05
States and this is something we're going to have to figure out is that you need to balance both the capital and the
00:39:09
goods flows okay I'm not saying we're going to have absolutely no trade with China but right now the relationship is
00:39:16
fundamentally that the Chinese have figured out they can create a massively powerful producer Society while America
00:39:23
becomes a weaker weaker consumerist society that is the broken nature of the relationship and I think rebalancing is
00:39:29
the right way to think about it but we have got to do it and I think we're way way behind the you maybe final question
00:39:34
but you said something which I thought was incredibly well said so I just want to repeat it when us growth is 1 and 2%
00:39:40
everybody's fighting exactly but when us growth is 4 to 5% everybody prospers yeah can you walk us through just how
00:39:46
you think about how we get that extra two or 300 basis points of growth and where you need to have less regulation
00:39:52
so that you can have more entrepreneurship or more regulation to kind of constrain folks how do you think
00:39:57
for that energy sector yeah I mean I I I really do think that we have to recognize that we have massively
00:40:06
overregulation Transportation over-regulated energy over-regulated home construction uh I don't know that
00:40:12
it's I don't know how easy it is to get another 300 bips of growth but I think you can get a lot more growth whether
00:40:18
it's 300 or 150 just by massively reducing the amount of regulatory burden in the real economy and again I I'm an
00:40:25
optimist I'm fundamentally an optimist on both you know crypto blockchain web 3 stuff but also on AI and you know the
00:40:34
way out of this may very well be to radically open up the way the technological innovation drives things
00:40:41
in the United States and and just on this point about China uh I don't know how much time we're we have I'll try to
00:40:47
be quick about this one of the things that Bob lik you need okay more about you all right well I'm a politician so
00:40:53
uh Buckle in we're going to be here for three hours L but um one of the real conceits of the 30
00:41:01
years of globalization that I think was really really deranged and hindsight very wrong Bob leiser who is Trump's
00:41:06
trade representative talks a lot about this is we had this conceit that we could separate the manufacturer of
00:41:12
things from the design of things right so if you get an iPhone right now and you get it out of the box you will see
00:41:17
that it says designed in Cupertino California of course the implication is that it's manufactured in chinen or
00:41:23
wherever they're manufacturing iPhones these days that that the idea that the iPhone designed in Cupertino is
00:41:29
increasingly no longer even true right it's something that we lie to ourselves about because the people who are doing
00:41:34
all the manufacturing of the hardware of the iPhone are getting much better at design and Innovation and part of the
00:41:40
reason why I care so much about this manufacturing thing is whether it's antibiotics for example why why haven't
00:41:45
why hasn't America invented an antibiotic in 30 years it probably has something to do with the manufacturer of
00:41:49
antibiotics has done almost entirely in very lowcost manufacturing areas you can
00:41:54
go through a whole host of goods like this but if you want to build a high tech High Dynamic growth economy you
00:42:02
have to have some native manufacturing and some self-reliance and so these two things are very related and I think it's
00:42:10
a big part of getting back to four or 5% growth is accepting that yes we're going
00:42:14
to have trade but we can't let everybody make all of our stuff SX yeah let me a question for you yeah
00:42:20
well I want to I want to wrap this up because I think we're we're basically at Time by um by just observing that both
00:42:28
Donald Trump and JD Vance have been on this podcast and it's not because I'm a crazy right-winger it's because we
00:42:35
invited them just because not just because um it's it's because we invited them and
00:42:42
they accepted we have similarly invited KLA Harris and Tim Waltz to and before that but he
00:42:53
forgot so we're We're still wai he said yes forgot he lost the he lost the zoom link so we we want to re to be on this
00:43:03
call yeah we want to re extend the invitation yes to KLA Harris and Tim Waltz you're welcome to come on the
00:43:10
podcast at any time and the format will be similar yeah and I just want to say JD I think your answers were fantastic
00:43:16
here today and I I really do appreciate you coming on and answering these questions very thoughtfully and you know
00:43:22
from my perspective when I heard that you were announced as the VP I thought well this is great a young person um
00:43:28
who's got a lot of experience in venture capital and Building Things in the world
00:43:33
and somebody who comes from humble beginnings like the four of us um and believes that a meritocracy where people
00:43:39
work hard and get reward for it so you check all my boxes in that way and I really think I feel much better you know
00:43:47
have my issues with your boss but um when you talk about you know the bite-size you know steps to it you know
00:43:56
I think one frame work to look at your relationship with Trump is he says things you know at the top of the the
00:44:01
highest vibration we're going to deport 20 million people and then you have a very practical approach 60% tffs makes
00:44:06
no sense but hey we've got to rebalance this and so I really do like your measured approach to this and I think
00:44:11
that you're a great counterbalance and I think we understand why he picked it I I
00:44:14
want to say one thing um thanks and this is not really related to anything except that you are not
00:44:26
supposed to be here that's exactly right yeah and that is really inspiring to other people who were not supposed to be
00:44:33
here thank you well yeah I appr and if you haven't read JD's book I read your book long before all of this and I just
00:44:40
want to say your book was so inspiring and I I have recommended it long before today to you know literally hundreds of
00:44:47
people it's a fantastic read if you haven't read it well and by the way available wherever books are
00:44:53
sold you're like Jak out exactly do you have an affiliate 529 account for the kids let I just just just two things
00:45:03
first of all Jason I I appreciate what you said but I also just want to defend uh my my running mate here because I
00:45:09
think that again the media doesn't often tell you the truth about Donald Trump Donald Trump cares more about the
00:45:14
details of public policy than almost anyone I've ever met in public life that's actually real he thinks about how
00:45:20
this stuff affects the real economy and Real Americans so if you're on the fence
00:45:25
whether you like what I said or dislike what I said I just encourage you listen to what he actually says because I think
00:45:30
that you'll become a believer that he can make the country great again as he promises uh but but but separate from
00:45:36
that I just want to say this is such an important conversation and you guys hold
00:45:41
and host important conversations every single day we should do more of it as a country but I'm glad to participate
00:45:46
today God bless everyone thank you ladies and gentlemen JD [Music] Vince that's great
00:45:55
[Applause]

Episode Highlights

  • JD Vance's Unique Perspective
    JD Vance represents both patriotism and wisdom, having served in the Marine Corps and understanding the tech industry.
    “He represents two contradictions.”
    @ 01m 36s
    September 10, 2024
  • Changing Opinions on Trump
    JD Vance admits he was wrong about Trump, acknowledging his effectiveness as president.
    “He was a hell of a good president.”
    @ 07m 21s
    September 10, 2024
  • The Role of a Vice President
    JD Vance discusses his vision for the vice presidency, aiming to support the president's agenda effectively.
    “I want to do all of the good things and none of the bad things.”
    @ 15m 55s
    September 10, 2024
  • Political Realignment
    A surprising shift sees Bobby Kennedy endorsing Trump while Cheney backs Harris. 'We traded Dick Cheney for Bobby Kennedy and that's an upgrade.'
    “We traded Dick Cheney for Bobby Kennedy and that's an upgrade.”
    @ 20m 40s
    September 10, 2024
  • Immigration Policy Challenges
    The complexities of fixing immigration policy are discussed, highlighting the need to address illegal immigration first. 'You can't fix the immigration question until you fix the real problem.'
    “You can't fix the immigration question until you fix the real problem.”
    @ 26m 46s
    September 10, 2024
  • Border Security Concerns
    The discussion highlights the urgency of addressing the influx of people at the southern border.
    “You've got to stop the millions of people flowing across the southern border.”
    @ 34m 41s
    September 10, 2024
  • China's Economic Relationship
    Exploring the complex interdependency between the U.S. and China in trade and manufacturing.
    “The relationship is fundamentally that the Chinese have figured out they can create a massively powerful producer society.”
    @ 39m 23s
    September 10, 2024
  • Inspiring Personal Journey
    Acknowledging the inspiring story of someone who wasn't supposed to be here.
    “You are not supposed to be here, and that is really inspiring to other people.”
    @ 44m 26s
    September 10, 2024

Episode Quotes

  • He had the patriotism and courage to serve America.
    JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024
  • What does it say about him that he selected a critic as his running mate?
    JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024
  • It's like an Avengers movie now.
    JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024
  • You can't fix the immigration question until you fix the real problem.
    JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024
  • It's the endless empathy aspect.
    JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024
  • You've got to stop the millions of people flowing across the southern border.
    JD Vance | All-In Summit 2024

Key Moments

  • Security Increase00:03
  • Red Meat Moment00:08
  • Introduction of JD Vance00:16
  • Contradictions in JD's Life01:36
  • Election Certification Debate10:04
  • Avengers Movie17:46
  • Empathy vs. Guilt29:42
  • Border Crisis34:41

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown