Search Captions & Ask AI

E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps

July 08, 2022 / 01:23:33

This episode covers the economic implications of job openings, inflation, and the Fed's monetary policy, featuring discussions on the labor market, consumer confidence, and housing prices.

The hosts, including Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg, discuss the current job market, noting that there are two job openings for every unemployed person in the U.S. They highlight the disconnect between job availability and wage inflation, suggesting that many jobs are not attracting workers due to inadequate pay.

The conversation shifts to inflation, with the hosts debating whether it stems from demand or supply issues. They discuss the Fed's recent actions and the potential for a recession, emphasizing the complexities of the current economic landscape.

Housing market trends are also analyzed, with rising mortgage rates and declining home sales indicating potential trouble ahead. The hosts express concerns about the impact of these trends on consumer behavior and overall economic stability.

The episode concludes with a discussion on the political landscape, including President Biden's handling of inflation and energy policies, and the disconnect between elite policymakers and everyday Americans.

TLDR

The episode discusses job openings, inflation, housing trends, and Biden's economic policies, highlighting disconnects in the current economic landscape.

Episode

1:23:33
00:00:00
you're seeing now the the fresh summer collection of lower piano this jason oh really is the thin summer jale okay
00:00:07
really beautiful cashmere container uh it's called like the king's cashmere or something and then this
00:00:13
is called a lovely yellow boating sweater anyways i took saks to my tailor and i took him to
00:00:20
uh laura piana and then at some point i just [ __ ] lost him and then i haven't seen him since so
00:00:25
you took him to your tailor and to lawrence wow great that the show remains accessible
00:00:33
to the every man and woman they're sucks good to see everybody's focused on what
00:00:58
matters okay everybody welcome to all in episode 86 end of the world except for these two douchebags we thought it'd be
00:01:05
really funny to vote to find the exact same outfit at laura piana i feel fully styled what a great look
00:01:14
you guys look so good it's like dumb and dumber in italy we'll let your winners ride
00:01:23
rain man david hey everybody welcome to episode 86 of the all-in podcasts we're not dead yet
00:01:40
uh still publishing with us from italy uh the rain man and the dictator in matching outfits
00:01:48
gentlemen how is italy it's fantastic and also with us the sultan of science himself david friedberg from an
00:01:57
undisclosed conference uh somewhere which we can't talk about how you doing i'm off the record this
00:02:03
week off the record this week and a little hungover it seems yeah you need a cup of coffee are you
00:02:08
drinking a little scotch last night late night a little scotch i went scotch and beer and it was a
00:02:14
it was a late night all right everybody we got a lot of news to get through let's just parse through some of the
00:02:18
data because data's been coming in and the minutes from the june fed are out the key quote significant risk that
00:02:24
elevated inflation could become entrenched if the public began to question the resolve of the fed so they
00:02:30
went from transient to now fearing entrenched jobs have slipped a little bit this is
00:02:36
something we've been talking about but just to give some context here we're still a historic uh
00:02:42
number of job openings we peaked in march 11.9 million uh in may we uh we dropped down to 11.3
00:02:50
and uh 11 million for six straight months it's just extraordinary if you look at this
00:02:54
fred chart it's just astounding to think that this many jobs are available two for one in
00:03:00
the united states there are two jobs available for every one person who needs a job
00:03:05
and this they're just absolutely stunning if you look at the um what do you think this is a precursor
00:03:13
to uh dropping down dramatically in the white collar sector is what the data is showing
00:03:20
what's your wage or major wage inflation i mean yeah that work that work clearly has to be
00:03:26
done and if you lay people off the number of unemployment not unemployed will go up but at the end of
00:03:33
the day the thing that we know here is we have a structural unemployment problem as you said two
00:03:39
openings for every person which means those openings aren't paying enough for people to leave the sidelines and get on
00:03:44
the field yeah or they've been incentivized to to be on the sidelines exactly so
00:03:51
obviously yeah these these job openings might actually be indicative of the opposite of what the
00:03:57
fed is telling us right the fed wants us to believe that they can just keep jacking up rates and then we're not
00:04:01
going to go into recession because we have all these open job wrecks but what if we should see the labor market as
00:04:07
really two separate markets they're sort of white-collar professionals and you're seeing all of these tech
00:04:14
companies that we're involved in slam on the brakes really quickly right now so we're going to see greater unemployment
00:04:20
there and then on the blue collar side you have this issue of record low labor participation yeah and so you
00:04:29
still have inflation there because they can't fill all the jobs because there's all these like warped incentives around
00:04:35
that there are to just put a number on it saks we're ten percent off the peak in terms of participation and if those
00:04:41
folks would participate it would really fill a lot of these jobs that would increase the production of
00:04:46
goods and services that might take some of the pressure off inflation and it would also increase monetary velocity
00:04:51
rights people would spend the money they make which then get us out of this mess
00:04:55
possibly i think part of the problem with the fed's approach here is that it's assuming that if they just keep
00:04:59
jacking up rates that will that will reduce demand and that will stop or slow down inflation and there's some truth to
00:05:05
that however i don't think this inflation is purely a problem of excess demand i think there's also a supply
00:05:11
problem meaning that not enough goods and services are being produced and the commodities the inputs that we need to
00:05:18
the production of goods and services those prices are increased they've been inflated and that
00:05:24
started well before the ukraine war but i think the ukraine war has now exacerbated this problem with respect to
00:05:29
energy and food if you had seven minutes for your over under uh for saks to mention ukraine you took the under you
00:05:35
won i'm just mentioning it as a exacerbator of the situation i think that's actually really good framing um
00:05:41
that it's an exacerbator um yeah so if you look at the quits let me just give you the quits
00:05:49
number because this is really interesting these are people who are quitting jobs it's still at a record
00:05:53
high so this concept of the great resignation we're still having over 4 million people quit their jobs every
00:05:59
month free pandemic quits averaged under 3 million a month and if you look at that
00:06:04
chart it's just staggering to think that in an economy that's going down people are still quitting now what is that
00:06:11
indicative of it's indicative of people believing that they can get another job you don't quit your job if you don't
00:06:16
think you can get another one or you have some savings available you want a yolo uh maybe you know
00:06:22
um you know spend a little free time going on vacation or there's a new economy emerging right i mean one of the the
00:06:29
cases to be made is that the pandemic and the stimulus that followed created a staggering short
00:06:37
shift in the types of jobs and the types of businesses that people you know used to make money and you know
00:06:44
a lot of people were able to shift to work from home and when you shift to work from home you have more flexibility
00:06:49
and freedom to choose other jobs that you can now do from home and people don't want to work in restaurants they
00:06:54
don't want to work in fast food and if they can find another job a gig like or services like or on demand type job
00:07:01
where they can have more freedom and flexibility and more earnings in their life they'll make that choice and this
00:07:06
happens so quickly because of the shutdown the lockdowns and then the stimulus the trillion dollars or two
00:07:11
trillion dollars that poured in it created all these new opportunities and all these new incentives for new
00:07:17
types of work and the fact is the old economy the old businesses all the fast food restaurants and the coffee shops
00:07:23
they're sitting with half employment and they can't fill the jobs because that's
00:07:27
you know that used to be a job that there was demand for and now it's not the case you know and i think that
00:07:34
that's what by the way i don't i don't know if that necessarily reverts in the near term because i do think that
00:07:38
there's been a substantial almost permanent change in some of these sectors of the economy not necessarily
00:07:43
all some will revert but it leaves big gaps in parts of the economy and maybe fast food restaurants are not going to
00:07:49
be as cheap as they used to be because in order to get people to work there you got to charge more and there's other
00:07:53
parts of the economy like services and you selling stuff on etsy and whatnot that are working for people let me just
00:07:58
put a number on that and then hand it off to you sax so just put a number on that the jobs that fell the most white
00:08:02
collar off 325 000 and manufacturing 200 8 000 the jobs that are increasing the most hospitality and retail so exactly
00:08:11
to your point people feel more options this whole thing was accelerated during the pandemic sex
00:08:16
well the question i want to ask freeberg is do you actually think that these new
00:08:20
options of work from home and remote work have actually made the economy more productive
00:08:26
it seems to me that obviously employees if you give them the no freedom over the decision of
00:08:33
their trade-off between work and leisure and so let's see what's made the economy
00:08:37
more expensive how so if you take a big step back to the day before the lockdowns started
00:08:46
we had a normal functioning economy that was growing by call it two percent a year
00:08:52
and the minute that we enforce these lockdowns i actually think what we did was we
00:08:58
started a supply side recession it's what sac said earlier so what does that mean
00:09:03
let's just say you're a factory and you make wheels okay just make something really
00:09:08
simple you were growing at two percent a year everything seemed hunky-dory you had
00:09:13
employees it was fine you used to sell your products make 10 15 percent profits everything was fine
00:09:18
and then the day after the government said you need to shut your factory down because we can't have people
00:09:24
spending too much time close together because we need to get a handle on this pandemic okay so you shut it down and
00:09:30
then for the next 12 or 18 months what happens that stuff sits idle these people that used to work for you
00:09:38
get two and a half trillion dollars put into their bank accounts they spend their time doing other things
00:09:44
and then all of a sudden people say okay it's time to start the factory up again
00:09:48
people want to buy wheels and now all of a sudden you find that because everything all around the world was shut
00:09:53
down there's no rubber to make the wheels there's no steel to make the axle there's no people to put them all
00:10:00
together and so what happens well prices go up because again you gave everybody else two and a half trillion
00:10:08
dollars so they're like well i used to pay a dollar for your wheel i'm willing to pay you two dollars now just make the
00:10:12
wheel give it to me before you give it to somebody else so that is like the classic definition
00:10:17
of a supply-side recession there's another piece of that too and sorry just to finish the point
00:10:23
and the fed basically confirmed this in the minutes that they just released today jason can you just read the quote
00:10:28
that you had in the in the notes well the one up top significant risk that elevated inflation should become
00:10:33
entrenched if the public begins to question the resolve their result i think the point is that you know we were
00:10:38
kind of in a supply side recession and now by raising rates to some crazy amount the end of which
00:10:44
we're still not sure about may actually then trigger the demand destruction to have a demand side
00:10:50
recession and so i don't i don't know that we have lived in a modern point in time where both things have been true
00:10:57
right there's been a principle of macroeconomics that you're everybody's always kind of debating is this a supply
00:11:02
side issue is it a demand side issue we know that in kovit it was a supply side issue we took all the supply out of the
00:11:08
market and now we're trying to figure out when we exhaust you know all of the money we've given
00:11:14
people and we destroy demand and take the incentives for demand to go away right
00:11:18
consumer confidence is now starting to turn what happens then well we're going to
00:11:23
figure that out in the next six or nine months but the thing is you have both that are true it's not as if the supply
00:11:28
side of the economy has been fixed it's not as if everybody is running at 100 capacity it's not as
00:11:34
if all the supply chain issues have been worked out yep so i don't know i just think it's a very complicated situation
00:11:40
yeah it's a perfect pivot and just to build on that um chamoth the downstream effects we always talk about the second
00:11:46
order uh impact because people are not going to work anymore downtown areas are dying so office space
00:11:54
commercial real estate saks you're in that so you can comment on what's happening
00:11:59
and then restaurants and commuting and all the stuff that was happening downtown san francisco's downtown mayor
00:12:05
london breed had a press conference and she's been tweeting hey we have to revitalize
00:12:09
you know soma in san francisco that's never going to happen that's off the table it's like bite and tweeting we got
00:12:14
to drop gas prices yeah i mean we have complete markets we'll get to politics uh sacks don't worry we've got plenty of
00:12:21
politics real estate i i read an amazing statistic today from uh like one of the
00:12:30
major brokers uh they they said that by the end of the year they're expecting 30 million square
00:12:36
feet of office vacancy 30 million in san francisco by the end of the year san francisco is tiny by the way because of
00:12:43
sub leases and uh and then tenants rolling off so the first thing i did is i tried to google what's the
00:12:50
total square footage in san francisco and i think it's about 75 million of office space oh my gosh you're talking
00:12:55
about 40 vacancy by the end of the year i've never heard of such a thing 40 let's be clear san francisco is fairly
00:13:03
unique and a bit of an outlier in the circumstance because so much of it was you know tech heavy and so much of it
00:13:08
went remote yeah and the city called everyone and it all got crime but like generally that's not the case i mean you
00:13:13
know new york is apparently still pretty stable right and miami's obviously doing
00:13:17
well la often but here's the piece of it that people aren't really thinking about
00:13:20
which is the only reason it's stable is because tenants sign up for long-term leases and this is why it turns out that
00:13:28
we work with a pretty bad business model is because if you're if all your leases
00:13:31
are month to month and you hit a recession your revenue gets whammied this is why landlords like long-term
00:13:38
leases with credit worthy tenants they sign seven years ten years and so letters of credit right right putting
00:13:43
together what that means though is that as these um tenants start to roll their leases roll over the
00:13:50
next few years they don't need as much space because they've either gone remote or they're like hybrid now and so
00:13:56
they're thinking of their office less as a headquarters which everyone needs to go to and more as like a co-working
00:14:01
space their employees occasionally go to so they're all reducing their footprints
00:14:06
this is why san francisco keeps increasing its vacancy is that as more and more of these leases roll
00:14:12
there's just no need they don't need as much space so they're also downsizing now here's the problem here's the
00:14:19
problem is that these buildings have debt on them right and that debt has what's called a debt service
00:14:26
coverage ratio dscr and basically you become you as a building owner become in default on your
00:14:34
debt covenants if your revenue from the building drops below a certain number and here's the problem all these new
00:14:40
leases that get signed to the extent there are any they're going to be at a fraction of what the old leases were
00:14:46
because this this vacancy is going to create a massively low market clearing price am i right to understand that
00:14:52
they're not allowed to sign those leases because they're under it so that's better than nothing or do they
00:14:58
are not allowed to take it it's not that it's just that the market clearing price
00:15:01
is going to be so much lower than their old leases that when they then look at the revenue from the building
00:15:07
and by the way that buildings can have a lot of vacancy on it now they're just not going to hit their their their debt
00:15:12
service coverage ratio so they'll be in default what that means is i don't understand how in a place like downtown
00:15:18
san francisco half the buildings don't end up getting owned by the banks well the banks don't want to own all these
00:15:22
buildings so they're going to be a fire sale going to happen then you need developers to come in and
00:15:42
have the capital to to basically make all those changes again it takes a long time but but think about the systemic
00:15:47
risk from that right if you know that a huge chunk of the real estate in is the commercial real estate in
00:15:55
downtown san francisco which used to be blue chip i mean the most blue chip right yes who are those financial
00:16:00
institutions who own those assets because they are now toxic assets and they will be revealed to be toxic assets
00:16:06
as soon as the leases roll well and then there are debt funds and banks as well right and so
00:16:13
what are the cascading effects when those shoes start to drop yeah okay and so just to put a finer
00:16:19
point also on the the jobs and that was our flop um net international migration um has just
00:16:25
plummeted we're well under a million folks uh coming into the country so the obvious solution to our employment
00:16:32
issues is to recruit people from other countries but let's go to the turn card uh yeah and there it is um we have just
00:16:38
stopped letting people trump just absolutely close the borders as you can see 2016. biden also is in favor of
00:16:44
closing the borders it's also sentiment it's like you know america is not the shining
00:16:50
yeah people still light on the hill it used to be not in the same way and there are we could easily have three
00:16:55
or four million people coming into the country if we wanted to yeah but we have three million people have come in just
00:17:00
under biden and illegal migration does that chart count illegal migration no this is legal this is legal okay well so
00:17:06
just make sure you count that because we've basically had uh open border policy yeah
00:17:11
if we didn't allow those workers then what would happen um okay let's go to the turn card consumer confidence
00:17:15
conference boards consumer confidence index in june fell to 98.7 from 103.2 in may
00:17:22
uh expectation was 100 so it's under the expectation the expectation index so when you look
00:17:27
at consumer confidence there's two your confidence in the present situation that's the blue on the chart and then
00:17:35
there's uh your expectations of the future and what you see is a huge divergence there uh starting to happen
00:17:40
people are starting to look towards the future as negative but they feel pretty good
00:17:44
about today um and so gentlemen what do you think of this chart it seems to me like this is sort
00:17:51
of akin to what saks was relaying about that founder at the co2 conference which
00:17:55
is like you know he thinks everybody else is gonna you know uh roll up their sleeves and and buckle down but he has
00:18:01
no intention of doing it i think people um are roughly the same way and i think their behavior is well you know um if
00:18:09
things are going to get hard i'll deal with it in the future but right now i have money in my pocket and you know if
00:18:14
you look at airlines and um how many people are trying to travel if you just look at
00:18:19
like the cost of a hotel room if you look at what's happening this summer it does not seem like people are slowing
00:18:24
down or tapping the brakes in any way yeah this is where i get concerned about credit because it's not coming from wage
00:18:30
gains you know the increased cost is there the increased income is not and you know we're seeing continue month
00:18:37
after month increases in consumer credit balances um and that i think you know this was
00:18:43
the point i made a few episodes ago was i don't think people are going to slow down how they're living and how they're
00:18:46
spending it's exactly um there's an inertia there's actually i don't know about that
00:18:53
i don't know i i just think after two years of a lockdown i do think that people are anxious to
00:18:58
re-establish some amount of normalcy and this is really the first summer where everybody
00:19:04
wrote large can be out and do the things that they were planning fake summer yeah last year was a little
00:19:09
bit of a head fake and look you have two years of pent-up plans of you know 50th anniversaries and weddings and all
00:19:16
of this stuff that's happening and so i think people are really spending money and if you look at it you know the the
00:19:21
consumer is holding up amazingly it's got to be some combination of jobs home prices um and this inflation but this is
00:19:28
why there has not been a downtick in demand i don't know why everybody thinks that there's been a downtick in demand
00:19:33
there was an article today numbers yet it's not showing up in the numbers yet very subtle okay sure it is there is a
00:19:41
subtle i actually disagree with you guys i actually think that the economy is pivoting on a dime here and it's it's
00:19:47
starting to show up subtly in the numbers here's some other data points consumer sentiment biggest drop in
00:19:52
consumer sentiment in 40 years that was in the last month right track ron track polling only 10 of
00:19:58
the country thinks we're on the right track if you poll people and ask are we in a recession something like plus 60 of
00:20:05
the country already thinks we're in a recession there's a slight political tent to that more republicans than
00:20:09
democrats think we're in a recession however even roughly half of democrats think we're in a recession so
00:20:16
those are all feelings not behavior though sacks we're looking at the data not the sentiment i think the behavior
00:20:22
will catch up with the sentiment i think the behavior is i think the behavior is
00:20:25
pivoting it's just that i think you have to dig beneath the surface and you have to look at things
00:20:30
like retail sales things like that i'm not sure david if you look back on all the number of times consumer
00:20:36
sentiment is dipped that the correlation to spending patterns is so uniformly predictive as we think i mean i think
00:20:42
that there are there's a slight positive correlation i remember but i don't think
00:20:45
it's like you know .75.8 it's not that so there's this weird preference falsification that happens
00:20:52
when you get asked what do you think is going to happen versus what do you do yeah and i think a lot of consumers
00:20:57
that's why they have you know we know the data in america like less than a month of savings or whatever those
00:21:02
numbers are despite all of the sentiment analysis and all of the stuff you would think
00:21:07
that there be behavior change but mostly people kind of just live in the moment and you know that that's partly because
00:21:13
they don't have the structural support to save or other things but the reality is that most
00:21:19
folks from what they say to what they behave there is a gap yeah and to your point
00:21:24
saks um this is starting to catch up we're seeing a slight uh down tick and we'll go to real estate next but if you
00:21:31
look i found i was doing some research on gasoline because that's obviously where people getting hit the most the
00:21:36
average household is now spending 5 000 a year on gasoline that's almost double last year so this is gonna have an
00:21:42
impact it's going to catch up but there's so many jobs available and there's so many people unemployed i
00:21:46
think it's manageable so to your point your mouth it feels like consumers can manage even this great headwind let me
00:21:52
just put a point to it i think the average uh per capita income in the us is about
00:21:59
38 thousand dollars a year that works out to about 17 bucks and 50 cents an hour roughly um
00:22:06
think about a person um with that level of earnings the average household in the
00:22:11
u.s has historically you know spent about a third on housing about 13 on food and about 16 on you
00:22:20
know their car and their gas and they only have about 12 left over for savings so you know if that 13 on food has
00:22:28
jumped by 30 percent the 16 that they're spending on gas has jumped by 40 or 50 percent and even if housing prices take
00:22:36
up a little bit all of a sudden your savings are gone and you're actually not getting it's
00:22:40
actually doubled freeburg it's doubled i guess so yeah by the way it's worse than
00:22:43
you say no it's worse than you say because you're you're using a per capita number yeah yeah and so what
00:22:49
but i think what i'm trying to highlight is that there is a distribution there is
00:22:52
a group of um the united states a small percentage of minority that have earned good income and are having their 50th
00:22:58
anniversary like jamaat is talking about taking their travel and that shows up in
00:23:01
the numbers there's outsized spending happening with a segment of the economy and what saks is saying i think is right
00:23:06
as well which is that the majority of americans are facing this really critical budget
00:23:11
crisis where their personal spending levels are now exceeding their income levels and there's a critical need for
00:23:17
credit and for personal debt and spending to go down and that's what's going to drive significant risk in the
00:23:22
next couple of months and quarters and years is the majority it looks some of the
00:23:27
numbers will look good because there's a segment of the economy that is overspending but the majority of the
00:23:31
economy is as sax is saying probably turning on a dime and i think both things can be true yeah let me let me
00:23:37
maybe tie a couple of these things together because i i tend to agree with you like i think that we
00:23:44
have been in a supply-side recession that is what has caused inflation we have to go through a process
00:23:51
of taking all the excess money that's been put in out and when you do that we will destroy
00:23:58
demand and then that will trigger a demand side recession because people will asset values and we will destroy
00:24:04
asset values so that process asset values went real quick yeah that will happen second
00:24:10
so the balance sheets of that segment of the population that is overspending right now once their balance sheets
00:24:15
really take the hit and they take a hard look at what their savings are they're going to cut spending
00:24:19
right yeah so but the point is i think we're still firmly in that first phase and and i hate to be the bearer of bad
00:24:25
news but the reason why i think that we're still in the first part of this process is because people broadly
00:24:31
speaking still have a lot of savings because of all the stimulus checks there is still a
00:24:37
lot of money so what how will we know maybe is the better point when all of that excess savings has been
00:24:45
you know torn away from these people because of high prices i suspect it's when jason's
00:24:51
first chart starts to close right so when people are you know go they're more motivated to re-enter the workforce i
00:24:57
think that's the signal free br your signal is another one which is when credit delinquencies
00:25:03
really start to spike it's because people then you know tapped out their savings then they tap their credit cards
00:25:08
and then all of a sudden they become delinquent when all of those things happen you're probably now at a point
00:25:13
where that first phase of the supply side issues are largely done and now you get to the
00:25:18
demand destruction but all of those roads unfortunately lead to the same conclusion which is like you know
00:25:25
equities get really under pressure there is no scenario where there's a bid to equities why would you buy something
00:25:31
that has lower earnings in the future or why would you buy something that has a lower discount rate for profits in the
00:25:38
future in this case both are true all right let's get to that because the piece we haven't got to so here's the
00:25:43
river card is housing because people's homes are the majority of their wealth here in the united states and that i
00:25:49
think will be the true indicator chamoth to your point labor participation certainly won but when this hits housing
00:25:55
that's when we're going to know we're in the end game the mortgage rate just hit
00:25:58
5.3 percent um why why do you say housing is the end game well i i think we haven't seen uh the collapse of
00:26:05
housing prices yet we're in a housing shortage and historically mortgages are still at um
00:26:11
you know the 30-year average so let me just give you the statistics here the mortgage rate is uh 5.3
00:26:17
uh if you look at this chart from our childhood on our parents in the 80s were paying 15 16 70
00:26:24
17 for their mortgages we're well below the 50-year average even with the uh rate hikes and so the 50-year average
00:26:32
for mortgages the 30-year mortgage is 7.77 so we're at 5.3 well below that but well uh this has been a very quick
00:26:39
turnaround from two and a half percent mortgages all the way up to five point three percent
00:26:43
home sales have started to show weakness so to sax's point this is starting to show up in the numbers but ever so much
00:26:50
um we're down six percent almost seven percent year over year and 3.5 month over month but we're holding
00:26:56
up historically so for the last 10 years we've been selling over 5 million homes a month with the
00:27:01
exception of the pandemic shutdown and that's this next chart you're going to see here and this is a really amazing
00:27:06
chart i found which is existing home sales versus a 30 year fixed rate mortgage in our childhoods in the 80s
00:27:12
we're selling 2-3 million homes a year as you see the rates that's the orange line come down massively from 17 and
00:27:19
then under 10 percent housing starts to flip people start flipping houses more and more often um
00:27:25
but we're still at that 5 million that number's got to drop down to probably four and then we would actually
00:27:31
have some capitulation uh feedback from the panel i mean look there's an old saying that a recession is when your
00:27:40
neighbor loses his job and a depression is when you lose your job and the reality is we haven't had the big job
00:27:47
losses yet it's starting we can start to see it and the number of open wrecks are
00:27:51
getting closed and then there were those job loss numbers that just came out which were a little higher than expected
00:27:56
so the job losses are starting but so far it's really been the step prior to that which is people are seeing their
00:28:02
401ks get destroyed stock markets down they're seeing their wages get destroyed by inflation food and gas prices being
00:28:09
much higher so there's a really good reason why people are sentiment is so negative out there people feel poorer
00:28:15
than they were before and this could get worse like you're saying jason with their nest egg in their homes getting
00:28:20
hit i agree that's the next shoe to drop just like the commercial real estate is
00:28:24
the next shoe to drop but i think the really big question over the next six months is what sort of job
00:28:30
losses do we see because that really is going to be the big determinant of of how hard this recession hits yeah i
00:28:37
agree with you and it's it doesn't look like if we if we're losing 300 000 jobs a month it's going to take a long time
00:28:43
for us to even get to one for one jobs and so this is just honestly i think i think
00:28:50
you're right but i think we're not even close to that i just don't see where all of a sudden there are these
00:28:57
writ large mass layoffs for example i would believe what you're saying if if the headline
00:29:04
in the wall street journal said walmart lays off 10 000 people right that's not what's happening in in fact it's the
00:29:10
exact opposite walmart's like well you know we seem to have record demand we're raising prices and and every supplier
00:29:16
will have to pay a gas tax and a supplier tax and deal with it so i just think that you're you're going to be
00:29:22
right in the end i just think we're way too early in this process to get to that place where we
00:29:28
did we're debating this i i don't see so chamath are you on board with the the ackman trade basically you know ackman
00:29:34
basically came out that tweet storm a couple of days ago basically saying that listen inflation is still the big
00:29:39
problem not recession the economy is humming along there's plenty of jobs and we're going to have a persistent problem
00:29:45
with inflation i think he's kind of right and kind of wrong i think that you can have inflation and a recession at
00:29:51
the same time this is what my point is i think we have been in a supply-side recession meaning
00:29:57
the day of the pandemic it's not as if demand stopped it's not as if you and i david didn't want to go out or use door
00:30:04
dash or take an uber or watch a movie in a movie theater we were not allowed right and so we found other ways in in
00:30:11
order to fulfill our demand that's why shopify you know did so well on behalf of the merchants that they served that's
00:30:17
why robin hood did so well that's why fortnite did so well right we found other places to spend money
00:30:23
but what went away was the supply and those incentives didn't come back and they're still not back that's why prices
00:30:29
keep going up this is the problem is the definition of a recession right chemotherapy it's not the problem that
00:30:35
most people don't understand that you can have a supply side recession and a demand side recession they just manifest
00:30:40
in different ways so well i think i think i think like i guess ackman is roughly right in some
00:30:46
ways he's roughly not so right in some others i think that we have an issue where we are going to transfer
00:30:54
the supply side issues that are driving inflation to average everyday consumers and their
00:31:00
ability to buy things i still think that the average everyday consumers desire to buy things is what
00:31:07
it was from before and on the margin is probably higher i do think at some point it will start
00:31:13
to change when prices get high enough but i don't think we've reached that point of equilibrium yet and the reason
00:31:20
is because companies like the walmarts of the world who see this demand on literally a real-time basis
00:31:29
knows better than anybody else when and how much they can raise prices downstream into their supply chain so
00:31:34
when you see something like this in the wall street journal i would just encourage us all to say they must see
00:31:39
that demand is the same or better and so they're going to now push those price increases down to everybody else
00:31:46
because now walmart says here is an opportunity for me to defend my earnings power
00:31:51
and this is why i think we're in this first inning of this so i don't know whether ackman is right or wrong
00:31:56
but i think we're in the early phases of a two-phase recession and i don't know what that looks like
00:32:02
because i've never lived through one of those and i think in many ways it's the combination of the two
00:32:08
and it was it was largely because of government failure government failure and how we reacted to the pandemic in
00:32:14
hindsight saks was right all along we overreacted by shutting everything down we probably could have kept some
00:32:19
supply online by understanding masking early on and then second we exacerbated with
00:32:25
failed government policy because we gave everybody trillions and trillions of dollars and we entered the capital
00:32:30
markets and perverted it with another seven or eight trillion more and by the way that has consequences well the
00:32:36
consequences are still talking about giving stimulus now in order to um help people deal with
00:32:43
so we are not we are not learning second you can't pour fire so if i lean on the
00:32:48
fire if i had to basically put what we are all saying into a neat little bow i would say
00:32:55
there needs to be a multi-phased economic correction one that corrects the supply that we
00:33:00
took out of the market during the pandemic one that corrects for all the excess money and then one that corrects for
00:33:07
demand that's a lot of stuff we have to do and so the more misguided government policy we have the
00:33:14
farther away from finding that equilibrium point we're going to be the longer it's going to take the more
00:33:18
damage it's going to be so sax the fed is obviously uh it's pretty much consensus they're going to do another
00:33:24
0.75 75 basis points later this month could be 50 basis points who knows there seems to be a couple of people saying
00:33:31
that that might happen if that does happen and it feels like inflation is starting to top out do you
00:33:37
think inflation you know starts to turn or do you think we're still going to see prices go up
00:33:43
because it does feel like it was starting to bounce along the ceiling what do you think's going to happen if
00:33:48
the 0.75 happens you're seeing the market rally today in the last few days especially growth stocks because of this
00:33:54
idea that the fed is tackling inflation they're raising rates and the market is looking out six months and seeing the
00:34:01
possibility of recession and they believe that is going to bring down demand and bring down prices and it
00:34:07
could i mean what i just described would be a soft landing i just am skeptical there's going to be a soft landing
00:34:13
because of what math is saying which is this is a multi-part problem and until we fix the supply side i don't think
00:34:20
that merely reducing demand is going to get us out of this i really agree with you it's a
00:34:25
production problem it's a demand problem and it's also as we just talked about a few
00:34:31
minutes ago an employment problem because the businesses that need to grow that need to generate revenue cannot get
00:34:37
the businesses that are dependent on people to do service jobs cannot get those jobs filled and so they cannot
00:34:42
grow their revenue cannot make their profits and there's a trickling effect in the economy of that you know what we
00:34:48
talked about that kind of job shift that job market shift that's happened so all
00:34:52
three and so all three are just this like dislocation that's happened totally right and it's unclear you know
00:34:59
someone very smart i was talking to yesterday who's a former um member of um an administration said um
00:35:09
we just there's literally no way to predict we just don't because think about the complexity of throwing three
00:35:14
rocks in a pond how do those three rocks interact and how the ripples interact is
00:35:19
really what we're trying to predict and it's very hard to do i mean if you translate this into the markets for one
00:35:23
second i think what we've done since november of 21 then nick you should play this
00:35:29
clip because you know not to say you know we didn't see this coming but we really did you know we pointed to
00:35:36
you know one of our friends and the person somebody else that we kind of know bezos and elon and we said
00:35:41
when the two smartest capital allocators in the world start divesting they clearly understand and see things
00:35:48
that the rest of us should pay attention to and to ignore it seems reckless or the clip and we'll be back in 30 seconds
00:35:54
after the clip the two most important founders of our generation the two smartest people who
00:36:00
have really consistently won elon musk and jeff bezos have collectively sold more than 11 billion of their holdings
00:36:06
this year alone and if you can't take all of that and decide for yourself what's right for you and your family
00:36:11
you're doing yourself a disservice i think it's important for me to never sort of like be forced to tell folks
00:36:17
whether i'm buying or selling although i'm willing to do it in moments where i think it's important but i think it's
00:36:22
really important to understand the context and so i think like these folks that like think
00:36:26
derisively about individuals who are managing risk i think it's really naive and i think it's um it creates a lot of
00:36:33
missed opportunity for them as well if the smartest people in the world are now selling their core holdings that they
00:36:40
told you they would never sell and you are not reconsidering your position on things
00:36:47
you're either much smarter than them or you're being really really reckless that was november you know and at that
00:36:55
moment i started a bunch of things in process which we can talk about at the end but i also sold a bunch
00:37:01
of the warriors positions i started a process at that point and i sold a piece in december and then i just sold the
00:37:06
last piece this week but then you know i sold a big piece of sofia in that moment
00:37:11
um but the the point was more the following which is since that clip to today what we've gone through is a massive
00:37:20
re-rating of the discount factor of these companies assuming nothing else changes
00:37:26
right that's all we've done we've we've not questioned whether earnings can change
00:37:31
you know all we said is okay well now we're going to take the discount rate up which means the value of this company is
00:37:36
less than it used to be that's all we've done through all of this wealth destruction that's happened since
00:37:42
november but now the second shoe has to drop which is if you believe that after the
00:37:47
supply-side issues are resolved you go through a demand destruction phase the earnings of these companies are in
00:37:53
real trouble and jason you posted something i think about the social media companies and
00:37:58
addresses gonna get hit right so one of the first things to go into recession is
00:38:01
advertising if you're going to belt titan at a company where can you do it well you lay off employees but you can't
00:38:06
get out of your leases as we talked about in real estate but you can cut your spending on marketing and so uh
00:38:12
right now the the it's looking pretty bleak for uh facebook because of the headwinds they have so the earnings
00:38:18
could drop which means and by the way the tax ratio could be totally we talked about that things are not
00:38:23
real right well we talked about that we talked about that over the last few weeks which is every time the market
00:38:28
rallied oddly facebook would be stagnant or trade off and we know when i called people on wall street what they said was
00:38:34
because you know we think this is the company that has the most pressure on earnings i
00:38:38
don't know if that's true or not but they took every opportunity and rallies to trim their position in facebook now
00:38:44
if that's true you have to remind yourself that is one of the 10 best companies in the entire
00:38:48
world and so if you're going to go and question the earnings power of one of the 10 best companies in the world
00:38:54
you may want to consider the earnings power of every other company that's not facebook there are so many things to the
00:39:00
facebook story they are facing a unique disruptive moment with apple uh ankling their ability to target users
00:39:07
supposedly google might follow suit with that which would be super anti-competitive and also the surging
00:39:13
tick tock uh taking market share from them there's some good news in energy which will then dovetail into politics
00:39:19
and into this farming situation freedberg turkish government claims it discovered almost 700 million metric
00:39:24
tons of rare earth minerals it's 15 times china's reserve if this is true you guys probably know we use about 150
00:39:32
000 metric tons a year right now that's going to double by 20 30. this is something like 4 000
00:39:38
years at the current demand and this would put them far beyond anybody else's chamati you've got investments in this
00:39:44
space i don't know if you've been tracking this news thoughts on another massive discovery of rare earths what
00:39:51
did you guys just have dinner dinner reserve what do you guys no that's the best she brought she brought us she got
00:39:55
a little pasta show me there's an incredible restaurant here in milan called desantis which
00:40:01
makes the best paninis you've ever tasted is this a harbinger of the future desantis what could be more perfect than
00:40:06
that oh the desantis panini here you go this is the oracle sex with the subliminal influence absolutely so good
00:40:13
this is what's going to get us out of this situation desantis all right chem off just quickly on the
00:40:18
rare earths uh if this is actually true what would this do uh and have you been tracking this
00:40:24
situation because it does seem to happen there's some truth to it yeah i think it's important to just take a step back
00:40:28
and kind of look at this thing with not like complete skepticism but just a little
00:40:34
skepticism it's okay not surprising that there's additional deposits all around the world meaning
00:40:40
we've always said rare earths are not particularly that rare it's just the question is you know which of the 17
00:40:46
rare earth elements at what grade meaning at what percent concentration does it exist and then
00:40:53
really importantly at what cost to extract it economically yeah right so meaning there's a ton of underdeveloped
00:40:59
rare earth athletes in canada the us africa australia brazil brazil they're just under under developed because when
00:41:06
you put all of these factors together it's really tough so the government release says they're going to process
00:41:11
like 570 000 tons of war that'll produce around 10 000 kilotons per year of rare
00:41:16
earths that implies sort of a 1.75 to 2 grade it's fine so there's just a lot more work i would
00:41:23
just sort of say it's really directionally great a lot more work needs to be done and more importantly
00:41:30
they need to release enough of this detail so folks like us and others can actually diligence it to to tell you
00:41:36
more accurately but the press release was exciting freeberg this reminds me a little bit of the peak oil head fake we
00:41:43
had you know 15 years ago everybody basically said we're not going to find more oil here's what's left of oil and
00:41:49
then norway is like yeah we just found more oil than existed previously it's been pulled out and the whole concept
00:41:54
that the world's going to run out of oil is now gone so freeberg what is happening in science that
00:42:00
we just can't predict what resources are available we know very little about what's inside the below the a certain
00:42:07
depth of the crust of the earth so um you know there's some estimates but we're always surprised and we know very
00:42:15
little about the distribution of those elements in the crust of the earth and below the crust of the earth
00:42:20
you know mining is an incredible industry i don't know the state of the art in engineering and
00:42:25
mining very well but you know from a pure geophysics point of view by some estimates we have
00:42:31
10 billion years of energy reserves below the crust of the earth that we can access in the form of
00:42:39
nuclear reserves geothermal power and that's excluding you know some of the the you know the potential of some
00:42:46
of these elements and what they could do um in building a more sustainable energy
00:42:50
economy why is people so pessimistic when we keep surprising ourselves and more resources
00:42:55
anyone wants a great book uh none of you guys were at the dinner that i did a few
00:42:59
weeks ago where we had stephen pinker come for dinner yeah read his book enlightenment now or you could watch one
00:43:05
of his uh videos on youtube where he's got like all 60 slides and he highlights like you know humans
00:43:11
have a tendency to focus on the risks and the concerns and the downsides and we miss the incredible optimism
00:43:17
um that is apparent as we actually look at the data of what's happening with our
00:43:21
species and what we're doing on our planet we have every reason to be optimistic you know we have fewer wars
00:43:26
than we've ever had murder rate per capita is lowest than it ever been longevity is increasing health
00:43:31
is increasing per capita i think everything's increasing and i think that the same is true in terms of you know
00:43:37
scientific breakthroughs discovery and engineering our way to a more sustainable energy and food future this
00:43:42
is one of the great things about having you as a friend freeberg is your relentless optimism and your actual cool
00:43:48
comp collective lack of anxiety uh another amazing news for me the eu parliament has flipped again credit
00:43:55
thurmberg is completely tilted we talked about the virtual signaling eu parliament you know and uh germany
00:44:02
turning off their nuclear power plants and and just securing the bag for putin the eu parliament flipped and they are
00:44:09
now saying these virtual signaling knuckleheads they came to the sensors and now they believe nuclear is green
00:44:15
also green according to the eu parliament is natural gas so uh this to me feels like the
00:44:21
beginning of the end for putin in saudi arabia uh if you look at the us becoming
00:44:26
a net exporter uh of energy uh it's quite possible the eu could become that as well if they actually
00:44:32
and this is a big f if they actually you know start building nuclear it could be the
00:44:38
beginning of the end of what some people are calling the woke green movement and this is certainly over this
00:44:43
realization that to transition to the next car to the uh beyond the carbon economy is
00:44:49
going to require continuing to invest in and support the carbon economy until those alternative solutions emerge and
00:44:55
to have dual track investing and i think that's what we're seeing around the world in the united states in europe now
00:45:01
and europe has always been farther way farther left in the united states in taking this point of view and i think
00:45:06
now this this has been a wake-up call for everyone and all it took was just a little bit of six dollar gasoline and
00:45:13
for people to personally suffer for them to change their virtual signaling nonsense yeah this is this is markets at
00:45:19
work yeah this is literally educating the public would you rather be beholden to
00:45:23
putin they pivoted because would you rather have nukes they pivoted from banning energy production to banning
00:45:29
food production should we talk about so on the energy side uh i did a in the group chat just a little breakdown on
00:45:37
the math i think it may be interesting for people to understand but today globally around the world
00:45:43
every single country in the world that is involved in the oil business is able to produce exactly one million
00:45:51
more barrels per day than we need so let's assume that we you know need a hundred million barrels of
00:45:58
oil a day as a as a as a world to continue to do everything we want to do we produce 101 million so we're right
00:46:06
on the knife's edge by august we're going to go through um a capacity increase in opec plus which is you know
00:46:15
opec plus russia etc uh saudi arabia is going to go from 10 million barrels a day to 11 million
00:46:22
barrels so not a huge increase um russia has is is thought to be able to cut production if they feel pressure
00:46:31
up to 5 million barrels a day without having any impact to their economy so jp morgan i think and um
00:46:39
uh credit suisse they they did this sensitivity analysis and here's what they found
00:46:44
they found that if russia were to cut three million barrels of oil so we would go from being over supplied
00:46:51
by one million to under supplied by two the price of oil would go to about 180 a
00:46:56
barrel if they cut 5 million so the threshold at which their economy doesn't really
00:47:01
get that impacted the price of oil could go as high as 380 a barrel while you would say okay well we just
00:47:08
need to pump more oil from other places and this is the problem in all of these rules that have existed for so long the
00:47:14
capacity doesn't exist right we were destroying supply governments all around the world were
00:47:20
making it very difficult to generate the supply of nuclear to generate the supply
00:47:24
of oil and to generate the supply of nat gas so saudi arabia says we can get to 12 million
00:47:31
well guess what they can only start the work in 2024 they'll be done in 2027. yeah so to your
00:47:38
point all of a sudden we realize wait we needed these bridge fuels all along how did we allow all of the supply
00:47:46
destruction to happen and now we need to unwind it it's going to be a very complicated process and if any of these
00:47:52
things happen if russia decides to play hardball against europe or america we better hope that
00:47:59
it's a mild winter because very quickly you can go from plus one million barrels
00:48:03
to minus two in a heartbeat yeah at american start and the last point on this about saudi arabia you'd say okay
00:48:09
well saudi arabia is going to go from 10 to 11 so that's good they have been at 11 million for a sum total of eight
00:48:14
weeks in their entire lifetime if we look at this i mean americans also buying 20 to 25 mile per gallon cars
00:48:21
that's got to end too and so personal responsibility uh is part of this the really interesting thing is china
00:48:27
already has this plan uh their nuclear strategy with the belton road initiative is to put 30 nuclear actors
00:48:34
in countries outside of china that they're trying to have influence in and they're they're building 30 nukes right
00:48:39
now they got 150 planned so china's just ultimately savvy and thinking big here about energy
00:48:47
independence and we need to follow them uh other big anybody have anything else on the energy situation before we go to
00:48:53
uh the farming situation let's get to the farming situation okay so dutch farmers are in revolt
00:49:00
after a new proposed law to cut emissions uh on tuesday dutch lawmakers voted on proposals to slash emissions of
00:49:06
pollutants uh like nitrogen oxide and ammonia they're targeting a 50 cut nationwide by
00:49:15
livestock produces these emissions so the plan will likely force dutch farmers to cut their livestock herds or stop
00:49:21
working all together farmers protested they put their tractors outside buildings they dump fertilizer
00:49:28
40 000 farmers gathered last week in the central netherlands agricultural heartland to protest these plans um and
00:49:34
started shooting at them uh these uh tractors were doing some uh pretty gnarly things uh and stopping
00:49:42
traffic and guess um and there were some shots were fired were they no wait the government fired
00:49:49
shots the protesters were unarmed as far as but supposedly they were doing something
00:49:54
dangerous were they honking threatening the safety of this is the other side of the story saks
00:50:10
um listen neither of us were there but according to the sources they were using the tractors to threaten the police like
00:50:16
physical bodily harm and that's why they unload it we don't know all the details
00:50:19
it'll come out but that sounds proportionate i i mean if you had a tractor coming at
00:50:24
you to kill you and you're a police officer okay so let's talk about the science of
00:50:29
its science let's go wait is it like the scene in austin powers where there's a steamroller coming towards austin
00:50:36
exactly jason's like oh they're using the tractor as a weapon that's like really
00:50:41
just i'm i watched people doesn't have a you were not there i was not there i'm just telling you what was reported
00:50:46
reporting and reporting what's reported and nobody knows if those reports are true so i think look i think it's worth
00:50:51
just highlighting because this is a really important this is the first time we've seen
00:50:55
government action of this scale and and the resulting kind of rebound effect on something that's really important humans
00:51:02
use roughly between two and six percent of our energy on earth every year to make ammonia
00:51:08
ammonia is the primary fertilizer we use to fertilize our crops around the world
00:51:13
and if not for the invention of the haber bosch process which you can read about in the book the alchemy of air and
00:51:18
the creation of ammonia as a synthetic fertilizer humans would all have starved in the mid
00:51:23
20th century it's an incredible technology breakthrough what we've learned over the years however is that
00:51:28
when ammonia sits on the ground for too long it volatilizes and it basically binds
00:51:34
with oxygen and turns into nitrous oxide and goes into the atmosphere nitrous oxide is 300 times
00:51:41
more potent as a greenhouse gas than co2 it lasts longer and it absorbs more heat
00:51:48
so there has long been concern about the overuse of fertilizer and the overproduction of ammonia that just sits
00:51:54
on the ground for too long that ultimately creates this incredible greenhouse gas effect and so there has
00:52:00
been talk in the united states under the obama administration under multiple epas
00:52:03
there was a supreme court ruling a few weeks ago that started to touch on whether or not the epa has regulatory
00:52:09
authority here to actually regulate the use of ammonia farmers generally put a lot of ammonia on the ground because
00:52:15
they get higher yields out of their crop the problem is if that ammonia sits there for too long it turns into a
00:52:20
greenhouse gas and so regulating ammonia and regulating this nitrous oxide emission has been you know at the
00:52:26
forefront of green the green movement at the forefront of climate change as one of the ways to
00:52:31
manage um and and and reduce the effects of global warming from human industry um
00:52:36
and now you know the dutch government has come out and started to do some of this regulation it's a little bit um off
00:52:41
because it comes from cows and and we're seeing what happens off free brook can we finally admit that it's the vegan's
00:52:47
fault now well at this point actually um you know is it is that a yes no no the ammonia
00:52:54
production in the netherlands is from i mean the netherlands just you guys know the
00:52:58
netherlands is the world's third largest dairy exporter uh they export three billion dollars a
00:53:03
year of milk to the rest of the world to other countries um and so they have all these cows that
00:53:07
are like densely packed and they're peeing everywhere and that pee is ammonia and it's causing all of these
00:53:12
problems the other problem with ammonia is if you guys look at the united states
00:53:15
corn farmers farm in the midwest when it rains the ammonia on their fields goes into the streams goes into
00:53:21
the mississippi river and goes into the gulf of mexico in the gulf of mexico there is a massive hypoxic zone there
00:53:28
are no fish they're all dead because when ammonia ends up in the water it kills life and so there's this green
00:53:33
algae and no fish and everything dies and so that's what the dutch are trying to regulate and the eu generally has
00:53:37
been trying to regulate is the removal of excess ammonia in ag production and in in right but again i still hear
00:53:45
though that if if if we ate less vegetables this wouldn't be a problem not correct not correct most
00:53:51
of the production of ammonia is used to make animal feed which is used to feed animals to make beef which is a terrible
00:53:55
decision you could feed it olives as we know olives tastes delicious with there because the issue here that is the issue
00:54:02
here that the regulators hit the brakes too hard on these farmers and they should have maybe had a more
00:54:08
gradual landing for that is it's been talked about for a long time and in the us there's just no way a law is going to
00:54:13
pass because the u.s senate is controlled primarily by rural states which are ag heavy so you see a lot of
00:54:20
bit you don't see a lot of bills that hurt farmers get passed in the united states because the senate is controlled
00:54:25
by farmers that are elect sorry senators that are elected by farmer by big farming communities and farming states
00:54:30
and so um you know it's been hard to get a regulation like this past where folks
00:54:35
have tried to and talked about doing it um around the world however in a place like the netherlands and the eu or as i
00:54:41
mentioned before they're far more progressive and have this very kind of green hat on
00:54:46
they're starting to take this sort of climate change action as they're calling it and that climate change action
00:54:52
you know does have the ramifications of destroying by the way one of the things they said is we expect and this will
00:54:58
destroy the livelihoods of many dairy farmers in in the netherlands that was horrible by the way look all kidding
00:55:03
aside i said that they said that directly by the way and the dairy farmers are like fu you're not
00:55:07
destroying our business for climate change i have a specific question though which is has there not been some efforts
00:55:12
to engineer how these plants themselves absorb nitrogen yes i have three businesses on this totally
00:55:20
right technology is going to solve this problem i'm super optimistic on that there are microbes
00:55:26
that are being used to coat seed those microbes can pull nitrogen out of the atmosphere directly so you don't need
00:55:32
ammonia you use far less ammonia there's a couple companies that are doing this really effectively they're growing like
00:55:37
crazy they're doing really well there are other projects uh and there's very simple solutions my last company we
00:55:42
had a product called nitrogen advisor where we basically told farmers instead of dumping all the fertilizer at the
00:55:47
start of the season you paste it out so the fertilizer doesn't sit there and volatilize there's all these solutions
00:55:52
that technology allows from software to bioengineering to these microbial solutions
00:55:57
and so we're definitely um i think going to resolve this but meanwhile these governments are in a frenzy to solve the
00:56:03
climate change problem and you know they're going to start to pass these laws that really hurt the livelihoods of
00:56:08
uh you know ag producers how do you guys think something like this happens because
00:56:13
typically you would expect when a government is about to pass something like this
00:56:16
there's sort of like a pretty fulsome review and all sides are brought together and there's working groups and
00:56:22
all of this stuff and at some point you would talk to some scientists at other points you would
00:56:26
talk to economists at other points you talk to the people who'd be directly affected like the farmers
00:56:32
is it that the virtue signaling around sustainability and climate change is just so high
00:56:38
that people just turn off their brains or well like what is actually happening here i think what's going on is you got
00:56:44
a bunch of technocratic bureaucrats in brussels who don't know anything about farming or these people who live in the
00:56:50
netherlands who've been doing this for generations and they sit there in brussels and they make up these
00:56:55
completely arbitrary guidelines and requirements 50 by 2030 those are suspiciously round numbers
00:57:03
okay and then some other you know authoritarian technocrat in the netherlands then says well we got
00:57:09
to implement this and they pass some crazy law and they don't even think about the impact on these farmers why
00:57:15
because they're deplorables i mean it's complete class bias it's just like the canadian truckers they don't think about
00:57:21
these people they don't factor into their equation they don't know how they live
00:57:25
and so that's what's going on here and so you've got this global elite of of technocrats who are willing to use
00:57:30
authoritarian tactics they're appropriating their farms they're taking them away that's why they're up in arms
00:57:35
see the rest of it which you're not saying it's not just technocrats it's the actual globally writ large have
00:57:42
wrapped themselves around the sustainability blanket and they believe that that word justifies all kinds of
00:57:48
bad unscientific enumerate policies right and by the way they're they've just woken up on energy right they they
00:57:55
had just banned energy production in europe they realized oh wait a second this is making us dependent on russia
00:58:00
and authoritarians well what is the other big export of ukraine it's food so they got smart on energy and now they're
00:58:08
about to repeat their same dumb mistake of basically prohibiting this area where they have an enormous
00:58:14
natural advantage which is food production so you know it's like they just keep making the same mistake over
00:58:19
and over again and by the way let me ask you a question by the way yeah look i'm
00:58:22
not going to question you on the science freeberg but here's what i would say is
00:58:26
i think there's a tendency on the part of these technocrats to think that the science is a lot more
00:58:32
bulletproof than it actually is that is certainly what we saw with covid is we had these same sort of global elitists
00:58:39
these technocrats who claimed to be health experts they made up all these lockdown rules that we talked about the
00:58:44
beginning of the show and what did they do no this isn't speculative but but what
00:58:50
but i will i will they're willing to use they're willing to use heavy-handed authoritarian tactics and i just don't
00:58:55
believe that the science of this especially this 50 by 2030 why is that the guideline who
00:59:02
can prove that those are the exact right numbers and they're willing to use any tactics necessary to to implement their
00:59:08
crazy rules let me ask you a question sex let's assume that there's a technology transition possible that
00:59:13
there are solutions that could be used i highlighted a few of them they just cost
00:59:17
money they require some investment and you know creating this distortion in the market by saying you can't release 50 of
00:59:24
the ammonia that you've been releasing forces a technological shift that otherwise would have taken longer in the
00:59:30
market do you agree that there may be a scenario here whereby you know governments can and should intervene and
00:59:35
i'm not making the case personally i'm just trying to you know highlight for you that i think this is where folks are
00:59:39
coming from right but there are alternative ways to make the dairy there are alternative ways to feed the cows
00:59:44
they're all or um here's where i think you're going with that which could make sense which is
00:59:49
okay you're saying there is a pollution externality here uh being created by the
00:59:53
farmers well we need to basically internalize the externality we need to capture the cost of that so what you
00:59:59
could do is gradually introduce some sort of permit system you know or a tradable permit system
01:00:04
right where that would incentivize the creation of these technologies that you're talking
01:00:08
about you want to do it gradually so you don't destroy the livelihoods of these farmers who've
01:00:12
been doing it for generations so that would probably be the approach you'd want to take i agree with you by the way
01:00:18
i think i think that is what is going to happen around the world is that that sort of cap and trade or taxation system
01:00:23
is going to get slowly rolled out for a lot of these externality costs in production and industry and agriculture
01:00:29
particularly because there are technological alternatives and it will incentivize the switch to those
01:00:34
alternatives because the alternatives will cost less than the taxes saks based on what you're saying is one of the
01:00:39
problems here that these technocrats these professional politicians they don't actually have great strategic
01:00:45
thoughtful um you know real world experience to do planning you know looking at germany their
01:00:51
inability to see the writing on the wall of what building a gas pipeline from russia to germany and shutting down
01:00:57
nukes would do it just seems like over and over they're just really bad strategic thinkers combined with this
01:01:03
fight you're wrong no jason they are influenced by these cultural elites who they want to create
01:01:09
favorites group think it's a lot of group thing going on yeah behind the group think is a class
01:01:15
bias right they only associate with other members of the professional class who have you know basically graduate
01:01:21
degrees they don't even interact with these farmers just like the just like the legislators making covid
01:01:28
rules the health experts never interact with canadian truckers so there's a huge
01:01:33
amount of class prejudice saying that these people just don't matter we can force them to obey our rules and if they
01:01:40
don't like it we'll confiscate their farms and by the way the rest of you you're gonna have to learn to eat bugs
01:01:46
or tofu or tempeh or recycled excrement or whatever i was the desantis what was your
01:01:51
desantis was the desantis uh prosciutto what did you have on there was it some mozzarella
01:01:56
and a roast beef that's a beautiful roast beef beautiful roast beef by disaster brought to you by dessert it's gonna
01:02:03
become a meme after this episode i have prosciutto is the best market campaign ever he's a
01:02:09
lock for president jacob i had prosciutto cotto with brie white truffle cream and lemon i mean did you have the
01:02:14
white truffle on it uh that's like a plus what's that bro this is 80 euros no it's like eight euros eight euros yes
01:02:20
bring something back bring some back uh wait i wanna i wanna say something about
01:02:24
this i hope the democrats uh embrace this agenda wholeheartedly because if we get all the voters who wanna eat roast
01:02:30
beef i'm pretty sure that's the super majority in this country the way to solve this freeberg is with the right
01:02:36
economic incentives there's no reason why the dutch government had to go and basically put thousands of farmers out
01:02:42
of business instead what they could have done is actually created the tax incentive that allowed farmers to adopt
01:02:48
some of these bleeding edge technologies when they were probably too expensive to
01:02:52
make it economically equivalent that i mean by the way that is not a newfangled idea this is not genius talk here so the
01:03:00
reason why they don't do the obvious simple thing is class bias it is exactly what david said it is the influence of
01:03:06
people who look hold on who look down on these people okay and who believe that they are
01:03:13
more virtuous because of their desire to defend climate change there's also a pragmatic piece of this this reminds me
01:03:20
of the cold debates we had there are 62 000 coal miners in this country like this is
01:03:25
a small number of people who are impacted we could just you know basically give them severance
01:03:30
or in a soft landing instead of the you know this crazy or or let them continue to do their job and
01:03:37
egress off naturally the economic free market will manage it will manage it on its own and instead what you could do is
01:03:44
actually green light nuclear subsidize some of these more adventurous ways in which you can extract and refine lng but
01:03:50
my point is this is where it's it's a real head scratcher why politicians don't do this and i think the only thing
01:03:56
that i can come up with is that they are overly influenced by these cultural elites with their perspectives i agree
01:04:03
that do judge very harshly what they believe to be right and what they believe to be
01:04:09
wrong can we take a victory lap here in the united states that we're energy independent
01:04:13
and that we're food independent can we take that victory how much longer jason no well i think we now need to think
01:04:19
instead of just being independent i think our mission should be surplus jason our president you know canceled
01:04:24
the keystone pipeline he cancelled a bunch of exploration permits in the gulf you know again it's we are one bad
01:04:30
winter away from all of a sudden being in the same situation as everybody else so it's not
01:04:36
as solid one bad we're not one freeberg where are we in terms of our independence jkl we are the number one
01:04:42
ag exporter in the world and by the way under under a different president just a
01:04:46
couple of years ago we were the number one energy exporter in the world the fact of the matter
01:04:50
when it comes to food and energy we have the greatest natural resources and we should be developing that we should be
01:04:57
moving but no sex my point is what if the united states took a philosophy of not just being an independent but
01:05:04
being even like a stronger surplus to the point of like building that up we are we're we're
01:05:11
working it out the market's working it out and we're taking you know we're we just need to feels like we could do
01:05:15
better it feels like we do i mean the issue with nuclear power as you know is the regulatory cost so you know it's 10
01:05:22
billion dollars and 30 years to get it let's move to the lightning round no i just want to show you guys the
01:05:27
monmouth pole which i think is worth highlighting okay we didn't talk about it but the monmouth pole that was
01:05:33
published a few days ago which is the june 2022 poll the number one concern that america the number one
01:05:39
thing americans are concerned about nick you could put the chart the table in the
01:05:42
in the uh the show nuts 33 percent care about inflation 20 15 care about gas prices 9 care about the economy six
01:05:50
percent care about everyday bills and groceries you know you add that up um that's the vast majority of what people
01:05:56
are concerned about and all the way down at the bottom of the table is climate change at one percent yeah absolutely so
01:06:02
i think it just speaks to the point about you know there there is and by the way i'm not advocating that this is the
01:06:08
right position but i will say that there is a huge distinction or discrepancy between what the average american is
01:06:16
worried about and you know where political leaders are trying to carry us forward i'm not sure
01:06:22
what the right answer is but there's definitely a disconnect and i think it's being played out in this netherlands
01:06:27
situation right now one point for you on that as well nick i put this article in
01:06:30
the in the chat but the the top esg fund manager in europe um of the of 2022 uh they released their um
01:06:41
results and the guy was up like uh almost 16 percent um and he disclosed what he owns and he turns out that he
01:06:48
owns conoco valero and exxon and according to the esg rules that these folks have passed this qualifies as an
01:06:58
esg fund because he doesn't own weapons porn and um oil sense but it allows all these people to walk
01:07:07
around thinking that their investments are tied up and things that are actually clean so it's not true so the point is
01:07:13
that there are there are these structural lies that have been baked into the system
01:07:17
um that they are supported by very shoddy accounting or rules or science and if we're really going to fix this
01:07:25
problem i think you have to go and inspect these things and call them out but like all of
01:07:29
this esg investing which perpetuates by the way perhaps you know why these governments just have no clue what's
01:07:36
going on sit on top of all of these lies there's nothing esg about conoco and exxon per
01:07:42
se that's ridiculous let's just call it for what it is this guy's a good fund manager it's a he's a good fund manager
01:07:47
he did well in a period where everybody else was down let's just celebrate that and not tell all these it had a good
01:07:52
marketing spin for a while so you know no but it's not just marketing it allows people to believe that there's a
01:07:57
solution that is being affected that is not true that's the part about it that's
01:08:02
super nefarious yeah okay listen we moved science up because science got a short shrift last week what is a
01:08:07
lightning round what is that i just wanted to things that were small that weren't like full segments i my
01:08:13
concept here was to just put things at the end of the show that we missed but what i did was give you a shout out
01:08:18
you're doing a great job moderating today by the way thank you put a couple extra hours in by the way i think
01:08:22
freeberg made a really interesting point a minute ago about me being a great moderator no not that okay um
01:08:28
about the um about the polling the monmouth polling where if you look at what voters care
01:08:34
about and what the elites and the elected politicians care about there's a huge divergence huge that's clearly what
01:08:40
happened in holland right you got these dutch farmers their livelihoods are being
01:08:44
taken away by people in brussels who don't even understand what they do i mean people want to make a living
01:08:50
yeah pretty but but this is why you're seeing populist nationalist uprisings in all
01:08:55
these countries is you've got a crowd of people who go to davos and make policy and they're completely disconnected
01:09:01
they're completely disconnected from the real concern look at pojo electorate bojo just got booted today why
01:09:07
ultimately at the root causes he was throwing covet parties when he was telling the same thing that everybody
01:09:12
nailed gavin newsom for this guy just got booted out as prime minister they're better than the united
01:09:17
states they're hypocrites and they're incompetent at their jobs let's call it what it is the association is you try
01:09:21
and do what you believe to be best for everyone but it's not it's not what's best for you
01:09:26
you know and i think that that's the point like climate fixing climate change stopping kovid i gotta do x y and z for
01:09:33
everyone but i still want to fly in a private jet and i still want to go to a covet party you know to a dinner party
01:09:37
exactly like super spread um this is why i think biden is very unpopular i mean look he's at hold on hold on let me
01:09:42
cheat out for you hold on let me see here okay so we are going to tear up okay i have a good joke just let me do it all
01:10:02
right so all of the free berks stands were breaking my chops that chamoth was cackling and laughing during a science
01:10:08
segment and we rushed him so i moved sides up so to the freedberg stands please stand down now we go to biden
01:10:15
arrangement syndrome segment at the end of the show joe biden's cognitive decline is becoming the topic sacks have
01:10:21
at it well listen if if you call this uh bind arrangement syndrome 62 percent of
01:10:27
the country has biden arrangements because it's like we all did for uh trump violence poll numbers are down to
01:10:31
something like 38 it's historic low for this point in time of a presidency but look the point i was trying to make was
01:10:38
i think that biden's problems flow from this dynamic we're talking about which is he campaigned as scranton joe he was
01:10:46
a working class hero who is going to give us a return to normalcy and what has he done he's basically implemented
01:10:53
every wacky idea of the progressive left he basically is representing that part of the party
01:10:59
that is completely disconnected from the ordinary desires of the working class and what are people concerned about
01:11:05
right now food and energy prices what is biden concerned well first of all he's blaming it on mom and pop gas stations
01:11:11
even even jeff bezos had to that's what was insane yeah so just to queue up the tweet my message is biden suite my
01:11:18
message to the companies running gas stations and selling and setting prices at the pump is simple
01:11:24
this is a time of war and global apparel bring down the price price you are charging at the pump to reflect the cost
01:11:30
you're paying for the product and do it now and then almost all small business franchises which is absurd and that's
01:11:37
just not how the economy works do you think that they look at a chevron and think it's owned by chevron or they
01:11:42
cannot be who's tweeting for what some some millennial some millennial with a couple of master's degrees
01:11:48
and 400 000 if that is rage tweeting from the strategy to make him look incompetent i mean i am forever thankful
01:11:54
for joe biden to getting trump out before he took a third or fourth it would take an eight-second google search
01:12:00
to know that less than ten percent of the gas stations in america are owned by these corporates well here's basis these
01:12:06
are mom-and-pop businesses this is insanity a lot of immigrants it's a lot of south asians this is why it's very
01:12:12
sensitive to me these gas stations they are mom and pop owned a lot of them are owned by immigrants and this is their
01:12:16
small very strengths of the american dream and biden comes along and he's saying you're doing too well i mean
01:12:22
these people their profit margins like two percent two percent two percent nothing my buddy's family by the way
01:12:27
owns a bunch of gas stations in the bay area and he told me they make no money on gas they make all their money selling
01:12:32
cigarettes and soda that's it that's the whole business yeah it's a way to get people into a
01:12:36
convenience store here's my thought i think i'm going to state it right here bezos is going to run for president in
01:12:42
2024. this is why he retired what this is why he's giving money away i will bet anything against them okay
01:12:55
he's playing legacy games no why else would he become a [ __ ] poster on twitter
01:13:00
ouch inflation is far too that wasn't even a [ __ ] post well anyway he's he's basically he doesn't have to run a
01:13:05
company anymore he's bezos after dark that wasn't even a [ __ ] post that was kind of like he was
01:13:10
outraged by the financial illiteracy this year stupidity and the economics take on the president there's no upside
01:13:21
there he's not starting a fight jacob it's just calling out something that on its face that tweet it was not
01:13:28
written by joe biden so let's not pin the blame on him but that office and that strategy is clearly broken because
01:13:34
it is run by someone at a minimum who's enumerate and who's clearly financially illiterate
01:13:39
who doesn't know how to google anything because that's the only way you could write something that insipid biden
01:13:45
should fire whoever it is that wrote that 100 biden is looking for scapegoats okay his popularity is at historic lows
01:13:52
the right track wrong track numbers are at historic lows he's looking for anyone
01:13:56
to blame and he's been going through a whole sequence and the the putin price hike wasn't working he couldn't even say
01:14:01
it right so now they're looking for anyone else remember elizabeth warren did something similar when they had um
01:14:07
food inflation they started blaming the meat the meat packing industry or whatever look this is not how these
01:14:12
industries work but they are looking for someone to blame for their own mismanagement of the economy and biden
01:14:18
baked this cake last year we've discussed this before he canceled energy independence his first day in office and
01:14:25
then moreover look on this ukraine situation if you knew you were going to take this tough putin approach jason
01:14:31
that i know you support okay but if you knew a proxy war was coming or you're willing to let one happen you would want
01:14:36
to basically create an energy glut not an energy shortage you'd want to basically maximize the amount of
01:14:42
american production and you would not want to alienate the saudis so what is biden doing now he's going over saudi
01:14:47
arabia had in hand totally humiliating to beg for forgiveness for last year ostracizing them and calling them
01:14:54
pariahs so no hold on a second they had no grand strategy if they wanted to pursue
01:15:02
a tough on russia strategy they should have maximized energy production instead they didn't even think about it they
01:15:07
didn't even think about it energy inflation i agree with you there it also i will
01:15:13
say is notable i think the democrats are actually now um i think they're quietly pushing the joe
01:15:22
biden cognitive decline so that they can put it they can feel it what do you mean
01:15:26
quietly how do you allow a governor a sitting governor to run ads in a different state against the the presumed
01:15:34
uh republican nominee unless it's ordained well i'm saying the cognitive decline
01:15:40
being i think they're obviously not going to come out jason i don't think this is happening surreptitiously
01:15:45
okay here's the tweet from bezos just so people hear it ouch inflation is far too
01:15:50
important a problem for the white house to keep making statements like this it's
01:15:54
either straight ahead misdirection or a deep misunderstanding of basic market dynamics this is a very strong statement
01:16:02
and the point i was trying to make before is why would bezos why would bezos at this
01:16:09
time why would he take on the administration i think it's important for biden to take control of
01:16:16
his communication strategy and to reclaim more of the center going into the midterms i think a lot of this
01:16:22
content the naming the shaming the blaming tends to be more of the playbook from
01:16:28
the far progressive left and i think that there's probably too many people that have infiltrated the white house
01:16:34
from those ranks and i think he needs to close ranks a little bit more and so uh i don't think he wrote this okay and
01:16:40
i don't think he would have wrote it if he was given a chance so it's clearly something is breaking between what is
01:16:48
being discussed as a team and then what is being executed on the ground sex look
01:16:53
biden's staff the ron claims been with him for years they reflect his desires i think this is classic biden if you look
01:17:00
at his career in the senate he's a grandstander he always like to basically scapegoat and demonize this is this is a
01:17:06
playbook he may not have written the tweet but he certainly endorsed it and he's given speeches now where he's
01:17:11
calling out this scapegoat and that scapegoat for basically the energy prices which are totally his fault he
01:17:15
could have had a better strategy around that santa's versus bezos you heard of your horse on the bezos thing hold on a
01:17:21
second jason you're not taking into account this is actually the second time that bezos has tweeted about inflation
01:17:26
so i'm taking this into account yeah okay that was back in may he called out the administration so yes it's on this
01:17:31
particular issue i think he feels strongly about this issue and i think he's looking at what
01:17:37
the administration is doing into saying this is a level of political stupidity and financial illiteracy that i just
01:17:44
cannot stand and by the way who is jeff bezos bezos is a very liberal guy he's an outspoken
01:17:49
critic of trump and he owns a very liberal media house at the washington post so i think this is a reflection
01:17:55
that biden has even lost the jeff bezos of the world and he's trying to spend it as a good thing as if
01:18:00
we don't need these billionaires but if you're losing jeff bezos you're losing a
01:18:04
lot of people in the center probably the entire follow the breadcrumbs he bought
01:18:08
the washington post he bought the largest house in dc and now he's taking on the administration i think it's a
01:18:14
clear path that he wants to run you can you can you can mention me on twitter if you disagree i'll tell you a
01:18:20
funny story to end uh after after the sale of the warriors completed and i tweeted this thing out
01:18:27
uh it was really beautiful uh dre sent a beautiful text to me um so did david lee
01:18:34
and then i got one text message from phil hellmuth saying i dispute how much credit you've given me i expected more
01:18:42
wow he so seven seconds to fill again it only took seven seconds and then he called and then he called i showed i
01:18:50
showed sax the text right it's it's an unbelievable text sax can sacks can testify to it and then he's like lost
01:18:56
his mind again he lost his mind he said basically like you know he he he took the credit that i gave him want to throw
01:19:01
out the window he thought i really tried to [ __ ] him over and then he said i i'm
01:19:05
gonna block you for a week but then change his mind just tell him you'll buy him into the to
01:19:11
the big game or something and he'll be fine no he didn't tax money he just wanted more credit more credit but you
01:19:16
want more tell him you'll stake him because he did he did introduce you to the deal correctly
01:19:25
is it true is it true that he is that phil hellmuth introduced you to the deal yes or no
01:19:33
he introduced me to joe lacombe got it so if if not for phil you probably would not have made that trade
01:19:39
um i don't know it's not clear because they had maybe they had no they had bankers and i was you know i was using
01:19:44
allen and company so i mean there's not a lot of people running around in that moment trying to write to
01:19:49
ten percent does he deserve any credit for you buying your stake in the warriors in
01:19:54
fact and i thought i gave him an appropriate amount of credit yeah jeremiah tweet stormed it was like it
01:19:59
was phil peter teal and like one other oh and then jacob jacob yeah and it's like better company he couldn't find
01:20:06
himself in like it's the best he's ever been except when he was with michael jordan and jay-z but other than that
01:20:12
this was the best phil's ever done i mean you know when i get did you see he made it to the second when i get my
01:20:17
fourth ring i'm going to take a picture like michael with the four rings but but jamal in the interest of piece maybe
01:20:22
you should just thank uh phil right now oh i have a great idea to tell chill free look at free bricks laughing he's
01:20:28
the only one that got that joke did you get that joke i was wondering if i should tell you to cut it or not i don't
01:20:32
know i think it's good here's a great one you know how don't cut that part i think it's a funny joke
01:20:37
you know how phil gives his bracelets away uh as like a recognition you don't have to do this but pretend
01:20:44
that you're giving since you have four rings that you wanted to thank the other three bessies on the show and that
01:20:49
you're keeping one ring for yourself oh my god giving us the other three rings oh my god thank you for all the support
01:20:54
we've given you all the support for the warriors yeah for the warriors that we gave you and all the council we gave you
01:20:59
over the years this will put him on me super chilly one of the four rings super tough it's the greatest april
01:21:07
actually that reminds me phil's next ring is going to me so i can't say anything critical
01:21:11
bracelet yeah the next bracelet's going to me so i gotta i can't say anything critical you know what you're going to
01:21:15
do whatever i said that was critical i guarantee you takes the bracelet and loses it in the first three days and
01:21:24
never wears it it doesn't care right in the garbage care never talks about it again all right everybody we're
01:21:29
back the team is playing professional crisp ball again point guard is back we'll see you on episode 87 we're gonna
01:21:37
make it to a hundred i feel like we can make it to a hundred bucks yes we're going to make it that the vibe is back
01:21:42
the vibe i love you guys this show in the text but it's great here i got to say i love i love hanging i love hanging
01:21:48
out with saxypoot like live and physical he's a [ __ ] little he's very you just
01:21:53
want to take him yeah he's he's an [ __ ] last time i hung out live with him he had an iv hooked up and
01:22:04
he was recovering from the night before snacks on an iv basically on an iv now that's how bad it's gotten for him
01:22:10
zach you look terrible can you please get some sun and just maybe eat one less sandwich
01:22:17
he's losing weight he looks good i had two no but you could afford to you're in great shape i mean sacks maybe a half of
01:22:24
desantis maybe you should have a half of desantis i think i'm gonna put you on half the centers we'll see you all next
01:22:29
time on the all in love you guys bye bye bye bye and they've just gone crazy with it
01:23:18
get mercies

Episode Highlights

  • Job Openings vs. Unemployment
    There are currently two job openings for every unemployed person in the U.S.
    “This is absolutely stunning!”
    @ 03m 00s
    July 08, 2022
  • San Francisco's Office Vacancy Crisis
    By the end of the year, San Francisco could see 40% office vacancy due to remote work trends.
    “I've never heard of such a thing!”
    @ 13m 01s
    July 08, 2022
  • Consumer Spending Trends
    Despite economic concerns, consumer spending remains strong as people seek normalcy post-lockdown.
    “People are really spending money.”
    @ 19m 18s
    July 08, 2022
  • Housing Market Concerns
    The housing market shows signs of weakness as mortgage rates rise, impacting home sales.
    “Home sales have started to show weakness.”
    @ 26m 46s
    July 08, 2022
  • Job Loss Predictions
    The potential for significant job losses looms, which could deepen the recession's impact.
    “What sort of job losses do we see?”
    @ 28m 30s
    July 08, 2022
  • Musk and Bezos Sell Holdings
    Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos have sold over $11 billion in holdings this year, prompting a reevaluation of investment strategies.
    “You're either much smarter than them or you're being really really reckless.”
    @ 36m 47s
    July 08, 2022
  • Dutch Farmers Revolt
    Dutch farmers protest against proposed emissions cuts that threaten their livelihoods, leading to significant unrest.
    “This is the first time we've seen government action of this scale.”
    @ 50m 54s
    July 08, 2022
  • Climate Change Action in Europe
    The EU is taking aggressive climate action, impacting farmers' livelihoods.
    “They're starting to take this sort of climate change action.”
    @ 54m 41s
    July 08, 2022
  • Class Prejudice in Policy Making
    Technocrats often disregard the needs of farmers, leading to misguided policies.
    “There's a huge amount of class prejudice saying that these people just don't matter.”
    @ 01h 01m 35s
    July 08, 2022
  • Disconnect Between Politicians and Voters
    There's a significant gap between what average Americans care about and political priorities.
    “There is a huge distinction between what the average American is worried about and where political leaders are.”
    @ 01h 06m 04s
    July 08, 2022
  • Bezos's Political Ambitions
    Speculation arises that Jeff Bezos may run for president in 2024, raising eyebrows.
    “Bezos is going to run for president in 2024.”
    @ 01h 12m 40s
    July 08, 2022
  • Biden's Communication Strategy
    Discussion on Biden's need to reclaim control of his communication strategy ahead of midterms.
    “It's important for Biden to take control of his communication strategy.”
    @ 01h 16m 14s
    July 08, 2022

Episode Quotes

  • People are still quitting jobs at a record high!
    E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps
  • There's a gap between what people say and how they behave.
    E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps
  • You're either much smarter than them or you're being really really reckless.
    E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps
  • This is the first time we've seen government action of this scale.
    E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps
  • I hope the democrats embrace this agenda wholeheartedly.
    E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps
  • If you're losing Jeff Bezos, you're losing a lot of people in the center.
    E86: Macro outlook: jobs, housing, inflation + Dutch farmers protests & EU climate missteps

Key Moments

  • Matching Outfits01:10
  • Job Market Insights02:58
  • Supply-Side Recession09:01
  • San Francisco Vacancy13:01
  • Consumer Sentiment Drop19:52
  • Ammonia Regulation52:22
  • Climate Action54:41
  • Biden's Strategy1:16:45

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown