Search Captions & Ask AI

David Friedberg Destroys the House Spending Bill: "Americans should be ashamed."

May 18, 2025 / 09:55

This episode discusses the proposed Trump tax bill, national debt concerns, and spending cuts. Key topics include tax cuts, deficit spending, and fiscal responsibility.

The episode features a discussion on the Trump tax bill, which aims to extend the 2017 tax cuts through 2034. The Tax Foundation estimates that these tax cuts could reduce revenues by $4.1 trillion over ten years, raising concerns about the national debt.

Freeberg expresses his worries about the budget and the potential for the annual deficit to reach $2.5 trillion. He criticizes the proposed bill for not making significant changes to address the fiscal crisis and highlights the rising interest rates on the national debt.

Freeberg suggests two guiding principles for fiscal policy: cutting existing program budgets to pre-COVID levels and avoiding new spending programs. He emphasizes the need for Congress to take action to address the growing debt and deficit.

The conversation also touches on the implications of continued deficit spending, including potential impacts on the U.S. dollar and the economy. Freeberg expresses concern that the current administration is not treating the fiscal situation with the urgency it requires.

TLDR

The episode critiques the Trump tax bill and highlights concerns about rising national debt and deficit spending.

Episode

9:55
00:00:00
Republicans are working hard on the big beautiful bill. The Trump bill would extend the 2017 tax cuts and jobs act
00:00:06
through 2034. That's kind of the big piece here is these tax cuts. And there's a bunch of campaign stuff like
00:00:12
no taxes on tips or overtime things that Trump promised. And the Tax Foundation,
00:00:18
this is a nonprofit that analyzes tax policy, estimates the tax cuts would reduce revenues by 4.1 trillion over 10
00:00:25
years. That's 400 billion a year. And uh the bill also aims to cut 1.5 trillion in spend over the next decade. Some
00:00:31
Republicans think this is weak and are pushing for 2 trillion in cuts or more. Freeberg, you actually I understand from
00:00:38
our group chat did a deep dive here and you I think are responsible in many ways
00:00:43
for bringing the issue of our national debt to the forefront especially particularly with this administration
00:00:50
and doge which we give you a lot of credit for you being a single issue voter for this. Are you worried about
00:00:56
the budget now? We're we're 100 plus days into Trump. Do you think he's got any chance of cutting the deficit? I'll
00:01:02
talk about the House tax bill, which I think is to use your term Jal absolute discard.
00:01:09
I uh bill is a bill is a disc. Wow. It is absolute discard. If you're an American, you
00:01:19
should feel shame that your elected officials are proposing that this is the bill that gets passed, that we vaporize
00:01:25
this much money, that we put ourselves this much further in debt, that we do not treat this situation as the fiscal
00:01:33
emergency that it is. The bill ultimately yields no real change in the annual deficit. that the annual deficit
00:01:40
could climb to $2.5 trillion being added to the federal debt load every single year going
00:01:48
forward. In fact, if you look at the Treasury yields, the 30-year is now kissing
00:01:54
5%. So, the United States has called $ 37 trillion of debt. At 5%, we're paying close to $2 trillion a year just in
00:02:04
interest on our debt. As this debt gets refinanced, the interest rates are going
00:02:10
up because the probability that the US will default on its debt payments, which is what you're buying when you buy US
00:02:16
treasuries, you're getting the US government to pay you some number of dollars with interest over time. And the
00:02:22
market is now demanding that that interest rate be as high as 5%. Because of this fiscal situation that the United
00:02:29
States finds itself in, we are now burning an additional $2.5 trillion a year, adding to our debt load. We are in
00:02:35
a fiscal crisis and we're not willing to admit it. And I've said this from day one that Doge can only do so much. And
00:02:42
clearly that's the case where they're now talking about sub $300 billion a year in potential annual savings from
00:02:47
Doge action. At the end of the day, Congress needs to take action. And this bill from Congress doesn't take much
00:02:53
action. I will tell you that if you look across the board, all of these programs
00:02:57
are still being proposed to be run at a cost that is well in excess of their precoid levels. And so I would set two
00:03:04
guiding principles if I was to be the benevolent dictator of the United States of America. My guiding principle number
00:03:10
one would be that any program that we intend to continue to persist have its budget level cut to pre-COVID to 2019
00:03:18
levels. Second would be and if we did that by the way we would be in a much better fiscal situation. The second
00:03:22
would be that we add no new programs in the moment. There's a whole bunch of new
00:03:25
thrown into this bill as well as increasing the cost and a few cuts here and there. I'll just highlight a couple
00:03:31
that I think are worth noting. You know, there's a cut in the SNAP program, which
00:03:34
is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. That's food stamps. And I talked about this with Brook Rollins in
00:03:40
the interview I did a few weeks ago. You can watch it on YouTube. And we talked a
00:03:43
little bit about how this SNAP program has absolutely exploded in size from 60 billion a year in 2019 to 120 billion a
00:03:52
year today. So, in this budget proposal, they're actually cutting it back by about 30 billion. So, to 90 billion. So,
00:04:00
it's still 50% higher than it was pre-COVID. And there's a lot of kind of stories we could go through on what
00:04:07
happened during CO that caused this thing to blow up the way it did, but political wrangling pulled money out of
00:04:13
the government into people's pockets, and that is persisting today. I'm a big believer in cutting taxes. Obviously,
00:04:20
I'm probably more libertarian than anyone else on this show or that we've ever had on this show, but at the end of
00:04:26
the day, you can't just say, "Hey, let's cut taxes and spend more than we're making. It doesn't make sense." A lot of
00:04:31
this stuff's going to be exploitable. The tips and overtime exclusions are a way to pander to people to get votes and
00:04:37
now keeping your promises on those votes. I think at the end of the day, the tips and overtime rule could invite
00:04:42
a lot of gamesmanship and loopholes that will be created and people will wake up
00:04:45
and be like, "Uhoh." For example, if I'm an independent contractor, I will enter
00:04:49
into a contract with someone that says, "Here's the service I'm providing you for 50 bucks, and then there's an
00:04:54
optional tip you can give me at the end, and then I won't pay taxes on that tip."
00:04:57
And I can give you a hundred other examples that this will create an inordinate number of crazy insane
00:05:03
loopholes. The interest on the debt at $1.9 trillion a year equates to 7% of GDP. That means seven cents of every
00:05:12
dollar that moves in every transaction in this country is being used to pay down interest on money we overspent in
00:05:19
the past. It has become an absolute crisis. I think that there's a few folks that should be shout out on this, which
00:05:25
is Senator Paul and Senator Ron Johnson, who both highlighted how ridiculously underimpressive the spending cuts are in
00:05:34
this bill. I think we've got a lot of work to do. I'm deeply disappointed. I'm scared and I hope that um that this all
00:05:40
gets kind of fixed up and in recon. Do you think that we should line item out all the new spending irrespective of
00:05:47
what it is? All new spending line item out. That's that's rule one. And rule two is all existing programs got to go
00:05:53
back to pre-COVID levels. You do those two things, we're in a great place. Yeah. And just to put some numbers and
00:05:58
some charts behind it, here is the the debt back to Clinton era. Clinton added uh 392 billion in eight years. It's
00:06:05
barely noticeable on the chart. 40 50 billion a year. Bush 5.4 trillion four years about 1.3 trillion a year. Obama a
00:06:13
trillion a year. And then we get to Trump 1.0 two trillion a year. Suddenly we decided we would double it. Biden
00:06:19
same thing. They added almost exactly the same amount to the right on track to do the same.
00:06:27
Yeah. It's not total dollar amount. It's percent of GDP that you're adding. And you know, right now at at two and a half
00:06:34
trillion dollars a year of deficit, we're talking about a deficit to GDP of like 8%. Yes.
00:06:43
8% a year. This is like Argentina. This is like insane. The fact that we don't treat this like a fiscal emergency and
00:06:52
everyone goes up and they tout, oh, we're going to make 60 billion in cuts in Medicaid. That's out of $820 billion
00:06:58
of annual spend. you know, oh, we're making 30 billion in cuts in SNAP. That's still 50% higher spend in total
00:07:05
than we were in 2019, a few years ago, when we didn't have that much of a problem. This has become like such a
00:07:13
reset of expectations. And I worry again that we went into this, I think, in a very optimistic way thinking that this
00:07:19
administration was going to treat things differently. We had Doge, we had alignment on the importance of the
00:07:24
budget. Besson has highlighted it. And then it's kind of back to gamesmanship in DC. all these representatives from
00:07:30
Congress show up and try and get money for their constituents in a way that is not sustainable. We're not going to be
00:07:36
able to keep this up and we're not really having the hard and tough conversations we need to be having. And
00:07:40
every year, everyone wants to get elected by keeping programs and keeping money flowing that their constituents
00:07:45
elected them to do. And they want to add new programs. They can go on CNBC and say, "Look at this cool new program I
00:07:50
stood up. It's great. This is going to create the future of America." And meanwhile, there's no future of America
00:07:55
because we're burning $2.5 trillion dollars a year. It is like an existential crisis that no one's willing
00:08:00
to stand up and highlight just how critical this emergency is. $2.5 trillion of deficit spending on a $28
00:08:07
trillion GDP. Tell me when in history that's actually worked out at the end of the
00:08:13
day except when you're in some war and you're going to end up taking over some country and getting all their resources.
00:08:17
And as you mentioned this actually this has this has you know knock on effects with regard to things like dd
00:08:22
dollararization. Why are you investing in the American dollar if you believe that's why it's going to this is the
00:08:27
debt this is the debt death spiral that we find ourselves in because what happens is people stop owning treasuries
00:08:32
when they start to question whether or not 30 years from now the US government is going to meet its debt obligations
00:08:37
even the smallest marginal question of that drives interest rates up 1% 2%. Suddenly your 30-year Treasury yields at
00:08:44
6% 7%. And then your interest rates climb and then your deficit spending climbs and that's how it becomes a
00:08:50
spiral. So now the debt goes up even more than it did the year before and then the next year it goes up even more
00:08:56
per year than it did the year before. That's why it's called a debt death spiral. One of the things I've heard in
00:09:01
a lot of members of the cabinet that I've met with over the last couple of months is we've got all these new
00:09:05
sources of revenue. I had an interview with Doug Bergam. He talked about unlocking America's assets. We've got
00:09:11
this balance sheet with lots of assets. We're going to do land leases and all sorts of other things. We we met with
00:09:15
Lutnik. He's going to sell the Trump gold card, the immigration card. We met with Bessant. He's got these ideas on
00:09:21
how we're going to drive. Everyone's got great theory on how we're going to grow
00:09:24
GDP and actually grow government revenue. But until those dollars start to flow in, we have to get our fiscal
00:09:30
house in order. We have to cut spending. When those dollars start to flow in, then you can start to spend. But you
00:09:37
can't spend ahead because otherwise the cost of the debt and the economics uncertainty is going to limit our
00:09:43
ability to execute on the back end on that revenue generation. And I'm very worried about no one kind of paying
00:09:48
enough attention to this. So, I just, you know, I feel very passionate having seen this bill that we're just not on
00:09:52
the right track.

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 75
    Most intense
  • 70
    Most shocking
  • 70
    Best concept / idea
  • 70
    Most controversial

Episode Highlights

  • Fiscal Emergency Ignored
    Experts warn that the U.S. is facing a severe fiscal crisis with rising debt.
    “We are in a fiscal crisis and we're not willing to admit it.”
    @ 02m 35s
    May 18, 2025
  • The Trump Tax Bill
    The proposed bill aims to extend tax cuts and reduce spending, but critics call it inadequate.
    “This bill from Congress doesn't take much action.”
    @ 02m 51s
    May 18, 2025

Episode Quotes

  • We are in a fiscal crisis and we're not willing to admit it.
    David Friedberg Destroys the House Spending Bill: "Americans should be ashamed."
  • This has become an absolute crisis.
    David Friedberg Destroys the House Spending Bill: "Americans should be ashamed."
  • It's like an existential crisis that no one's willing to stand up and highlight.
    David Friedberg Destroys the House Spending Bill: "Americans should be ashamed."

Key Moments

  • Tax Cuts Debate00:06
  • National Debt Concerns00:43
  • Fiscal Crisis Warning02:35
  • Proposed Spending Cuts04:00
  • Existential Crisis07:58

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown