Search Captions & Ask AI

E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde

May 27, 2022 / 01:49:26

This episode covers the All-In Summit 2022, featuring discussions on COVID-19 impacts, market trends, and gun control measures. Guests include Chamath Palihapitiya, Brad Gerstner, and David Sacks.

The hosts reflect on their experiences at the All-In Summit, with Chamath sharing his enjoyment of meeting attendees and the organization of the event. He also mentions concerns about COVID-19 exposure, particularly for his elderly mother.

Brad Gerstner highlights the diversity of participants at the summit and the meaningful conversations that took place, emphasizing the importance of community and support among entrepreneurs.

In the latter part of the episode, the conversation shifts to the recent tragic shooting in Uvalde, Texas. The hosts discuss potential solutions, including red flag laws and the need for mental health support, while acknowledging the failures of politicians and the system in preventing such tragedies.

The episode concludes with a call for action and a focus on identifying and helping at-risk individuals to prevent future violence.

TLDR

The episode discusses the All-In Summit, COVID-19 impacts, market trends, and solutions for gun violence after the Uvalde shooting.

Episode

1:49:26
00:00:00
hey everybody welcome to another episode of the all in podcast it's been a crazy uh couple of weeks
00:00:07
here we had the all in summit and boy was it amazing our bestie david freeburg couldn't make it today uh he had uh some
00:00:15
personal things he had to attend to so joining us again is brad gerstner welcome back
00:00:21
to the fifth bestie uh on his is this your fourth appearance now including the uh all in summit i think you've been on
00:00:27
four times now very good all right that's about five percent of the episodes a nice nice uh
00:00:33
i think that's a nice little chip in your uh in your your belt there i mean unworthy replacement to freedberg but i
00:00:40
do what i nobody can replace freeburg that is the truth [Music] [Music] just uh going around the horn here
00:01:01
chamoth did you have a a favorite moment on stage a favorite moment off stage what is your general impressions of the
00:01:08
all-in summit 2022 i thought the people i met were really impressive i really enjoyed meeting people and
00:01:18
learning what they did i also thought you and your team organized really an incredible event and
00:01:28
i forgot how good you are at these things but um so i give you a lot of credit i really enjoyed participating
00:01:34
the only thing that i was nervous about during that whole thing which probably limited a little bit of my fun
00:01:41
was my mom was coming she's 81 and so it's not i was not super psyched to really be in the throes of all the
00:01:49
parties to be honest just because i was like i didn't i didn't necessarily want to
00:01:54
get coveted and i didn't want to introduce it to her and got it yes you know nat ended up getting
00:01:59
really really sick but more uh like a flu and a cold yeah um but you know i've been fine my mom's fine i know a bunch
00:02:08
of folks that came unfortunately tested positive so that was the only that's the only
00:02:13
downside where i would i would have wanted to be a little bit more carefree but um
00:02:19
that was the only thing that was but that's not in anybody's control so yeah i i recall that when i had a christmas
00:02:26
party back in december like a week later he called my christmas party a super shredder even though i
00:02:33
tested everybody at the door every single person was negative at this summit so so my parents went to this conference
00:02:42
they both got coveted my aunt who lives in miami who was in her 70s she got coveted
00:02:49
are they okay by the way are they good yeah they're most important it's you know it's omicron it was like
00:02:54
you know it's like bad for two days and then you get better so they're gonna be fine thank god
00:02:58
or no yeah one did and one didn't so um my brothers got covered in so your brother's got it which one josh josh and
00:03:06
jamie both got it and then josh's wife got it so she um took the pax love and everybody's great now but yeah
00:03:14
if you go to my a lot of people who came to the event it was their first time out
00:03:18
like this was for a lot of people i think very emotional and exciting because it was their first venture out
00:03:23
and if you go to miami to a conference like you're gonna get getting a covet especially if the event
00:03:30
organizer doesn't test anybody it's impractical to test 850 people nobody would come like no if you want to make a
00:03:35
profit right nah it wouldn't have actually been that expensive you could put that on the
00:03:39
people they could just you know share their results but i think at this point you know even on
00:03:43
the planes going out there nobody's wearing masks i don't know if you know well you guys are flying
00:03:48
private but you know my flight out there it was all you know nobody's wearing masks anymore but anyway j cal i think
00:03:54
everybody who went to the conference took the risk upon themselves of getting coveted and you know it's not
00:04:01
the end of the world or anything they're all fine but i'm just pointing out the hypocrisy
00:04:05
my hypocrisy yes exactly it's like you're like nancy pelosi or something where you're criticizing
00:04:12
every time a republican gets covet it's their fault but when you throw a super spreader and i think ais now stands for
00:04:19
all in super spreader yeah it's not your fault it was well beyond your control it
00:04:23
was the virus absolutely and in fact it was probably just florida it was just yes but in mine i tested
00:04:36
yeah it's not even proven that mine was a super spreader all right in all seriousness did you have a favorite
00:04:42
moment on stage or some reflections on the event uh i thought the elon thing was really good by the way and then the
00:04:48
only thing i'll say is the the palmer lucky thing was pretty incredible um yeah which will be we will
00:04:53
be releasing the podcast i think that that episode is uh eye-opening yeah we don't want to say too much but i
00:05:02
think that you were uh really i think you handled yourself really well there oh thank you for that
00:05:09
jamath what actually happened i wasn't there for that portion i haven't heard anything about we give a
00:05:14
mini summary here of it i guess i'll give you the outside inversion he gives what i can only describe as an
00:05:21
incredibly motivating breakdown of american defense and what his company and you know you have to remember to put
00:05:30
it in context this is a 29 year old young man who has now started two multi-billion
00:05:36
dollar unicorns so you know this he's going to be around for a long time doing amazing things
00:05:42
but he talks about anderl which is his defense company really impressive and then the whole you know everybody's kind
00:05:49
of like rousing and cheering and applauding and then he said you know i have something else that i want to get off my
00:05:55
chest and i was standing beside jason backstage jason was looking at the monitor i was
00:06:01
looking at the mirror at myself but uh and check out your sweater uh and uh he said uh you know there's a
00:06:09
person here that that has been you know really hard on me you know tried to ruin
00:06:13
my life attacked my family and represents you know these really this strain of very influential people
00:06:20
in silicon valley who have gotten it totally wrong basically and he called out cancer culture and
00:06:26
then he called out jacob and to jake all's credit after he was done jacob was the first one that walked out
00:06:32
on stage shook palmer's hand and then we all sat down we talked to him and then the two ended up hugging it out at the
00:06:38
end but there were moments that were very heated in the middle of it um the whole thing was
00:06:43
incredible to watch i got to be honest with you super dramatic yeah incredible i
00:06:48
the most shocking and surprising aspect of the whole thing was that a person as important as palmer
00:06:55
lucky felt the need to get revenge on a person as unimportant as jason calcanis that was the part i mentioned when he
00:07:04
was like my career was when he said important people in silicon valley i initially thought oh my god
00:07:09
he's talking about me what did i say i that was i was thrown by that tip if i'm being honest he's like my entire
00:07:17
career was stopped in its tracks and i had to claw my way back because jason calacana said this and i was like
00:07:23
um no actually no i'm looking forward to when you're it's going to be a great episode
00:07:30
it's going to be coming out next week thank you yeah and i i want to give a shout out to
00:07:36
um glenn greenwald matt tybee and antonio garcia martinez for appearing and you know we did two different panels
00:07:42
we did one on domestic politics with glenn and taibi and then the we did a debate on ukraine which has now been
00:07:49
published between glenn and antonio and particularly i want to thank antonio because
00:07:54
it did end up being a little bit of a two one at the end which wasn't my intention but i have my own views on it
00:08:00
too although i did try to be somewhat restrained and even-handed in the moderation but it's a
00:08:06
really good debate we should have had longer we only had about 30 minutes but you can see that online right now it
00:08:13
actually is a great uh example of actually how to listen to somebody else having a completely diametrically
00:08:18
opposed view and still be respectful i thought those guys were great to listen to i think it's a new format sax and i
00:08:22
think you know somebody was like hey maybe you and j cow could do it i think you and i moderating like two people
00:08:27
with different sides it could be like a really interesting format for us for future events brad did you have a
00:08:31
favorite moment on stage maybe outside of elon of course you can mention i would say you know maybe both on stage
00:08:37
and off stage you know i think listen i think this podcast has taken some shots and
00:08:42
probably appropriately so at times for being a bunch of men in a little bro culture
00:08:49
and the effort made to build authentic community and diversity into that room i've been to a lot of
00:08:56
conferences whether it's claire thielke you know patty wexler extraordinary you know
00:09:03
minds women all diverse cultures economic backgrounds when we walked around the floor p you know indiana kentucky
00:09:12
west virginia everywhere right and who were starting companies having authentic conversations and
00:09:19
frankly we're grateful for the community and the advice that they were being given these were from big startups to
00:09:26
very small startups and so for me that was a highlight the effort you made i don't know almost 40 women you know both
00:09:34
economic i thought as well as you know geographic uh diversity and then you know listen i had a moment
00:09:42
after bill and i after gurley and i got off stage um i was stopped by a group of founders
00:09:47
and they said hey we need your help i said what and they said we are that company you and bill were just talking
00:09:53
about and said was screwed we raised 100 million dollars last november from from tiger at 100 times
00:10:00
arr what do we do right and like like the fact that that you know that those conversations are
00:10:07
going on of course they're not screwed and it's a very interesting company but it led to a real conversation that you
00:10:13
don't often have um at conferences like that and so i thought it was much more than just a
00:10:18
bunch of talking heads on stage i thought it was a real give and take in the you know uh in the crowd
00:10:25
afterwards the parties the in-betweens and so i really enjoyed that the other big um thing that we avoided um
00:10:34
failing on was uh putting back the amas i think these amas are some of the most interesting
00:10:41
parts of that conference and i think that we should make sure that we probably do an ama jason like
00:10:46
both days we do a two-day conference the amas are awesome yeah when the audience is asking us and just to
00:10:52
explain to people how we were able to um you know curate the audience we ask people i think it's a good playbook for
00:10:59
other people if they want to steal it to uh they could they could pick the price
00:11:03
they wanted to pay based on their station in life and so people said i want to come i'll pay 500 i'll pay a
00:11:08
thousand i'll pay 2500 instead of the 7 500 ticket price which was like 300 people in the audience and we just said
00:11:14
hey what do you love about the show you know what would coming to the conference
00:11:17
mean to you and we kind of just sorted that and we look for people who are passionate about the show and then you
00:11:21
know the the thing that stuck out to me and i know freeburg uh had a great time as well
00:11:27
was the passion of the audience and how much they appreciate what we do here every week and so the love that we got
00:11:34
people asking to take selfies people telling us what the show meant to us you know and people coming from all
00:11:39
different uh stations in life really it made it not elitist but it felt like the
00:11:44
people who were there were all builders and that was really an interesting part what i instructed the
00:11:50
team to do was anybody who was like a real estate broker or a money manager a sales executive a business development
00:11:55
person i said let's not have them there no offense to those you know critical functions but a lot of people will come
00:12:01
to these events to sell and get customers but i said anybody who's a builder an artist they're making something in the
00:12:07
world let's give them the priority for these the scholarship tickets so you know when you met people they were all
00:12:12
building something interesting in the world and and no press i think also created a certain
00:12:16
vibe there we didn't have the media there criticizing every panel and you know every speaker and so it i think
00:12:24
it just yeah made it magical well i think it really couldn't do it without all you guys uh freeberg and the besties
00:12:30
and brad you were helping behind the scenes so couldn't do without everybody and my team
00:12:34
turned out surprisingly well i thought i thought the whole thing was a j-cal grift and it actually turned out there's
00:12:41
been there was there's some grifting going on for sure we still haven't seen an accounting of of exactly where all
00:12:45
the money went so it's it's close we'll have that accounting any day now saks any day now what could you have done
00:12:51
better what would you change for the next time um you know i it's a great question you know we we
00:12:58
always do a document with lessons learned right after the event so i went through my team and i had 26 people from
00:13:04
my team uh 21 from launch and i think five from insight came and uh you know helped staff the event
00:13:11
a little more time to to work on the speakers in the agenda um if we had a little more time i would have teased out
00:13:17
of each bestie you know maybe five or ten speakers or topics they wanted and worked backwards
00:13:22
so just a little more time to to to to experiment with the format but i i took an experimental approach to it we did
00:13:28
have people who did solo dolo like ted style talks we then had people come on stage uh with the besties and do
00:13:35
discussions but having all besties on stage all the time is a little hard for for everybody i
00:13:40
know david likes to focus on maybe a couple of things other people like chamoth and i like to be on stage for
00:13:44
everything i think um but the format was experimental and there was a couple of great moments i
00:13:50
think when we overlapped folks so i think nate silver overlapped with keith roboy
00:13:55
uh you and bill gurley together tim robert i'm sorry overlapped with keith roboy um those were magical moments i
00:14:01
think and so i have something in my brain about weaving individual talks and data points with
00:14:09
the besties and then having the next speaker on the stage the next speaker and i would have liked to have more time
00:14:13
to refine that format i think okay my only question is was the palmer lucky deal
00:14:19
was that a plant did you plan that no did you put that in there i'll tell you the back
00:14:24
story is i you know i i've had invited him on this weekend starts before all in came out many times he said [ __ ] you
00:14:30
basically in so many words i hate jake out and then when all in came out he's a fan of this show um i think he's
00:14:36
particularly a fan of david sax's and i think david knows a lot of the investors
00:14:41
the investor pools i think overlap in a lot of different circles of ours and um i said would you like to come to
00:14:47
the summit and i and i basically said to him heartfelt like listen i think the work
00:14:51
you're doing to protect the country most people in silicon valley don't believe in building weapon systems but i
00:14:57
kind of am with you on this so we probably have some common ground here i think the mission of what you're doing
00:15:02
is more important than our disagreement from you know the hillary clinton versus
00:15:05
trump days maybe we could just you know put that aside and have you speak and surprisingly these people were like yes
00:15:11
i didn't know they were doing yes because he had a plot to dunk on me but who cares you know like i don't mind
00:15:15
being dunked on if i'm wrong about something or i'm right it's the whole spirit of this show is to
00:15:21
you know to learn and grow and have great conversations so with that maybe we start the show now
00:15:26
let's do it all right let's go let me am i am i still allowed to do intros or is
00:15:30
it too triggering because i do have interest for this week do it say do it okay i got thumbs up only if
00:15:35
they're nice well you know that's the caveat that i cannot guarantee but anyway here we go
00:15:40
getting ready to gallivant across the italian countryside he spent 40k at all in summit on food and wine he took 400
00:15:48
selfies in three hours those sweaters my lord the wreak of power the dictator himself is back shamath polly hoppity
00:15:54
welcome back to the show thank you jason all right his body looks like he doesn't
00:15:58
eat cake he's got a major steak in snowflake you might have heard him earlier on the week with bill gurley
00:16:06
he's the crossover fund manager with that bde our fifth bestie the audience hangs on
00:16:11
every word he has to say the dark knight of namaste welcome back to the program brad gerstner
00:16:17
i like it what's bde if you don't know then you don't know you can look that up urban dictionary
00:16:24
he's about to turn 50 but he looks like he's 65. after 72 hours in miami we're not sure he's still alive the [ __ ]
00:16:31
keeper is jealous of the facts under his eyes his portfolio has been down for 35
00:16:35
straight days no surprise the rayman himself is back david sacks too rough on saks no it's okay is it
00:16:43
okay i felt like i might have gone too rough on sax all right i guess we start with markets and um s p 500 down 15
00:16:51
year-to-date down down 11 two stocks of note uh that did particularly well during covet uh zoom
00:16:56
and snowflake reported their earnings this week and they beat expectations of course
00:17:02
that uh gives them no reprieve uh market cap for uh zoom 31 billion they got almost six
00:17:10
billion dollars in cash uh which was a prescient move to cash up i guess during the
00:17:15
the boom times their stock jumped 18 after the earnings so great for them uh q1 revenue
00:17:22
2023 1 billion 12 year-over-year they got an 80 gross margin for that business pretty impressive
00:17:29
500 million adjusted free cash flow 7 000 employees they're at almost 500 000 per employee
00:17:36
uh at this point and stock is still down 43 year to date but a little bump here so i i guess we might be bumping along
00:17:42
the bottom soon and just to quickly recap snowflake and get your comments after that snowflake reported their
00:17:47
quarterly earnings yesterday 41 billion market cap they got almost 4 billion in cash
00:17:54
they were down slightly at the taping of this episode today and they're down 67 from the peak of 409 a share in november
00:18:01
so they're not in the 85 plus club like coinbase and peloton but still they've lost two-thirds of their
00:18:09
market cap 422 million in revenue 85 year-over-year beat their expectations uh and um
00:18:18
gross margin 72 net retention 174 percent uh 70 on growth within within their existing
00:18:24
customers to david sacks's point about why sas is so great they got 4 000 employees
00:18:30
uh 6 300 total customers so uh i guess maybe starting with you brad since you're in this in the vic of it
00:18:37
thoughts on uh i know your major snowflake early supporter thoughts on what's happening in the market and maybe
00:18:44
any indication uh from these two let's face it strong results uh in the bouncing along the bottom i
00:18:52
think is how we'd all describe what's happening right now well i think listen what makes investing hard is sometimes
00:18:57
you have to hold simultaneous truths right and the reality is there's a lot of cognitive dissonance when you see
00:19:02
something down 30 40 50 but it may be still fair value right we were talking about last october
00:19:09
like make no mistake about it just take snowflake as an example the move from 400 to 200 was probably
00:19:17
just what i would describe as normalization in a world where rates were going back to two and a half or
00:19:23
three percent right the market last october had gone too high we discussed it on this pod we
00:19:30
discussed it on cnbc and so i expected a return to what we call the five year average as we discussed at the summit
00:19:38
what's been surprising to me is the negative reflexivity that's kicked in as a result of the war in ukraine
00:19:45
uncertainty about hyperinflation uncertainty about hyper rates and so now we're seeing software generally all risk
00:19:52
assets growth assets trading now 30 40 50 below the five-year average right so i don't think it's helpful to say
00:20:01
well none of that should have happened no the reality is meant that all of this stuff was going
00:20:07
to be down 20 to 50 percent because it was way overvalued last fall we gaslighted ourselves in many respects
00:20:15
we didn't hedge it perfectly in many respects but that's you know that's what happens in late market cycles so the
00:20:21
question is where are we today and for example like why is the nasdaq up 300 basis points today right this it feels
00:20:28
like whiplash i come in one day and you know you have market caps up 10 percent one day down to 10 the next and so i
00:20:36
think it's really important to help the people listening understand you know like what happened this week and what's
00:20:43
going on it has been kind of a uh a a pretty mixed bag this week in fact of of things going down chamoth
00:20:51
what are you gonna take on this of what we're seeing in the market this week specifically with precipitous drops and
00:20:56
then you know the bouncing up again look we we still had some amount of rate uncertainty from the fed i think people
00:21:07
weren't sure how aggressively they were going to hike but by early this week it was pretty
00:21:12
clear there's going to be two 50-point hikes one in june and one in july and then effectively a pause
00:21:20
because then the fed funds rate will be at around two percent and everything from there will probably be path and
00:21:27
data dependent okay that's effectively what they said now i think the the markets had actually
00:21:35
already started to see that writing on the wall so if you go back to you know one of our
00:21:40
favorite measures which is the 10-year break even it's effectively rolled over which meant that you know which means
00:21:46
that from the highs in sort of late april it started to come down which says that you know they were
00:21:53
thinking that you know the inflation was not going to be as bad in the back half of the year
00:21:58
and then the second is that corporate credit which is really what matters in some ways to the fed because
00:22:04
that's where they can intervene what is the spread above treasuries that a company can issue debt
00:22:11
when it goes crazy and it goes up it means oh no the cost of capital is going up
00:22:16
that's going to be hard for companies to raise money they may have to lay people
00:22:19
off they may need to get into cost cutting mode right that's what goes through everybody's mind
00:22:23
but that's also now about 35 and 40 days rolled over which means that the gap has started to shrink
00:22:30
you know between the us treasury price and what you know decent corporates can can issue debt at
00:22:38
so it looks like we are set up for potentially a decent little rally here the problem is is it a rally that is
00:22:47
sustainable or is it a rally that's basically what we call a dead cat bounce or a bear
00:22:53
market rally where you know you just get some one or two weeks of relief before the
00:22:58
thing spears down again and we're not going to know although tomorrow on friday there's going to be a really
00:23:03
important set of inflation data that gets released and i think everybody's going to be sweating these details so
00:23:09
right now we're in a moment of pause and there is the potential if this data comes back as reasonably
00:23:17
good which means prices are you know not escalating as much as we thought um inflation is not going to be as bad
00:23:24
growth is going to be moderate that that gives a lot of ammo for the fed to kind of take their foot off the
00:23:30
um off the gas here and in that case markets will go boom sax um the interesting note i think is
00:23:39
uh what we talked about here everything was correcting except housing and we were wondering when this uh you know the
00:23:46
increasing rates would hit mortgage rates mortgage is way above five percent uh in the last two weeks i think it's
00:23:52
come down a little bit but the mortgage rate basically doubled and then we finally saw it earlier in this week um
00:24:00
uh what day was it it was two days ago so we're taping this on thursday so i think on tuesday new home sales
00:24:07
591 thousand they expected 749 and i think the last month before that was 763 is that
00:24:16
uh indicative of the uh raising the rates and slowing down inflation has finally occurred and
00:24:24
that maybe we the fed maybe uh steered too much into the turn how do you interpret that
00:24:29
massive it was a pretty massive miss in terms of home sales in the estimate well
00:24:33
the costs of buying a home are going way up because home loans are now more expensive so
00:24:38
that's going to factor into all sorts of consumer purchases anything that's financed can be more expensive
00:24:44
you're also seeing companies starting to slow down spending uh really starting to
00:24:49
slam on the brakes we see it in startup land startups are all slashing costs right now but that's eventually going to
00:24:54
percolate up to big companies too you saw dara's memo basically when he got back from wall street remember he
00:25:00
published that a couple weeks ago saying we need to sharpen our pencils cut everything
00:25:04
uh what wall street is looking for now is free cash flow um so it seems to me like we're headed into a
00:25:11
pretty serious downturn or recession here i mean i've been saying we're in recession for months
00:25:16
um the the the you know the tricky thing for the fed is that they don't have a lot of
00:25:21
good options because we have a lot of recession indicators blinking red right now at the same time
00:25:28
inflation is still high so they're kind of caught between a rock and a hard place i think what the fed
00:25:33
should have done is in 2020 hindsight is back last summer we first got that shock cpi
00:25:41
print remember it was like 5.1 percent seemed to come out of the blue because for years and years we've been talking
00:25:46
about deflation nobody thought inflation was a problem all of a sudden we got that 5.1 percent print
00:25:52
they were in total denial about it they just dismissed it saying that inflation was transitory and you know yellen said
00:25:59
the same thing and so basically everyone just ignored the data for six months and what they should have done was stop
00:26:06
qe right then and there they could have taken a little bit of time to think out you know a rate increase
00:26:12
strategy but they were still basically engaging in qe for nine months after that
00:26:19
you know first inflation warning and if they had stopped qe there then we wouldn't have had this
00:26:24
asset bubble in the second half of last year that's when it inflated the most and we could have had more of a soft
00:26:31
landing unfortunately now they let the they kept inflating and really until the end of q1
00:26:40
and they've yanked away the punch bowl so violently that i think the real economy's gonna go into recession so
00:26:45
that's where we are right now i mean i don't know what that what the right answer is now
00:26:51
given that we're in this you know almost stagflationary position let's try and answer that brad what is if if we didn't
00:26:57
act soon enough if you agree with uh sax's point pretty hard to disagree with um and we didn't take the medicine a
00:27:03
little bit at a time um and now maybe we've overreacted or maybe it's going to get worse what is the right thing for us
00:27:11
to be doing now because all these companies doing hiring freezes layoffs at the same time that the housing market
00:27:17
tanks at the same time crypto tanks at the same time the stock market tanks this feels like a major shock to the
00:27:24
system is it time to maybe reconsider some of these um no you know for the fed to reconsider or just slow
00:27:32
and steady wins the race here what what's the best option first we should erect statues to senator manchin for
00:27:38
saving the republic by vetoing stimmy too that would have been devastating that would have been
00:27:45
devastating so we'll revisit that listen the fed said two really important things
00:27:50
this week they said number one our communications have been helpful in shifting market expectations
00:27:59
what that means the fed is the air traffic control they said to the markets at the
00:28:04
beginning of the year you're 90 degrees off runway heading get your ass back on runway heading it was a slap in the face
00:28:13
to markets and it was a radical adjustment now you hear the fed in these little statements this week they said hey
00:28:21
we're well positioned this year to assess the effects of policy firming in the back half so they're saying we're
00:28:27
going to hit it with 50 50 and then we're going to take a look so now think of it as air traffic
00:28:33
control you're two degrees to the left you're two degrees to the right they're steering us on runway heading i don't
00:28:40
think the fed wants to do anything at this moment to lose credibility in the inflation fight we're going to get 50
00:28:46
we're going to get an another 50. but they're doing what they want to do which is keeping markets sufficiently
00:28:53
tight right they wanted to take the crypto market down they wanted to take all the excessive risk in the stock
00:29:00
market down right you're absolutely right the inventory of 350 000 homes spiked from four months to nine
00:29:07
months right used car prices are rolling over the last three months all the things they needed to do they're
00:29:14
doing right they need to stay the course however the hyperventilation this week by bill ackman on twitter
00:29:22
that the fed needs to be doing radically more that somehow we need to be raising
00:29:26
rates to six seven eight percent in order to squash inflation to me seems highly misdirected and totally out of
00:29:35
touch with the fact that on layoffs.fyi they've already announced 750 companies that are announcing layoffs
00:29:43
right the market is getting the drill i i totally agree with this i think we're in a we're we're in a
00:29:50
pretty reasonable place here the real the real question is now what do you need to take the market
00:29:55
lower and this is more of a nuance but you know when you look at companies that are now quote-unquote cheap right let's
00:30:01
take an example like you um you know well we hear a lot about google or facebook right people say my
00:30:08
gosh this is cheap because if you run a screen on it it's like 10 11 12 times price to earnings
00:30:15
well the price you know because you can look on the screen the real question is are the earnings
00:30:20
right and the thing that can take the market lower is if you actually think earnings are
00:30:27
modeled incorrectly right so we saw this week as well snap i mean completely just blew themselves
00:30:35
46 down intraday yesterday i think i just want to say something about one day they have the most incredible propensity
00:30:43
to self-immolate on earnings calls than any other company i've ever seen there's
00:30:47
probably been three times no less than three times over the last four years where i don't know whether it's just
00:30:55
poorly scripted or not well rehearsed or the people that are helping evan get ready for these things
00:31:04
but these are disastrous calls you know facebook's had a couple in this lifetime
00:31:08
but snap consistently probably once every 18 months will do this anyways the thing just completely implodes the
00:31:16
stock implodes by 48 or something and then it you know rolls over to companies like
00:31:22
facebook and google who then are off eight or ten percent my point in telling you the story is
00:31:26
that if you think facebook and google just as an example again are cheap at 10 times well you better hope that the
00:31:32
earnings are right because the earnings are actually wrong that's actually 27 times in 19 times you
00:31:38
know i'm making these numbers up to give you the example because the earnings are
00:31:41
fundamentally wrong so that's the risk now that's left in the market in my opinion that could take it
00:31:46
much much lower is if that you know all of this slowdown really contracts spend and the earnings are actually not
00:31:54
accurate the forecasted earnings will need to be revised over the next two or three
00:31:59
quarters and that's where we will probably see the low if however growth is muted
00:32:06
and the fed can as brad said it's a really good analogy now just course correct by degrees you know a degree
00:32:12
here degree there we've probably consolidated the lows so said another way we look at a company
00:32:18
like snap or google a lot of their expected value has to do with people's ad spend we now see
00:32:27
less homes being sold so maybe people in real estate stop spending less on ads they're a major advertising category
00:32:32
maybe direct to consumer uh people are not buying because the supply chain issues this stuff is too expensive and
00:32:38
we're not going to spend on ads and so all of this ad revenue that's some of the first to come out of people's
00:32:44
budgets so you know even as great as snaps results actually look they were up 38
00:32:51
year-over-year uh they're generating over 100 million free cash flow the guide was terrible because what they
00:32:57
said was our e right our earnings right are not modeled accurately right and so that's the risk that you now have to
00:33:06
take to every company you cannot look at a screen at yahoo finance or bloomberg look at a price to earnings ratio and
00:33:12
say wow seven times that's so cheap it may not be seven you have to do your own work it could actually be much
00:33:19
higher than that because earnings may be at risk the earnings being at risk is this
00:33:24
contagion that we talked about i don't know six maybe it's like we're going on almost a year now saks we talked about a
00:33:30
contagion happening because we've all experienced it in the last two recessions to the dot com bust in the
00:33:35
great recession so what are you seeing in terms of at companies this contagion risk are people
00:33:41
canceling sas contracts on the margins obviously people are doing hiring freezes obviously people are laying
00:33:48
people off are people gonna start renegotiating uh salaries you know what what's the next couple of
00:33:54
shoes to draw pure sax and that would signal to you a true bottom here like have you seen
00:34:00
i thought maybe one would be if somebody offered somebody an investment with a two or three times liquidation
00:34:05
preference have you seen one of those yet have you seen people say we're going to renegotiate salaries because that's
00:34:09
when it was really dark right the last two times yeah it's going to take time to get to that
00:34:15
point i mean where you start seeing structure and deal is in deals is when a founder
00:34:20
is trying to preserve a valuation they got last year and that can't really be justified but they don't want to just
00:34:25
take the down round so you try to preserve the optics the last round by building all these preferential terms we
00:34:31
don't like to do deals that way but you'll start to see them happen later this year when you know companies get
00:34:36
more desperate that's not the first thing that happens though um i think that that to your
00:34:41
point about the talent market it's definitely going to happen has it happened yet no
00:34:46
what has to happen is first all these open wrecks get cancelled companies freeze their hiring plans then
00:34:51
eventually they do layoffs that's coming and then the talent market cools so those students are here both are here so
00:34:57
what's the next in talent wars well yeah i mean look but within the next six months the talent market's not going to
00:35:02
be as hot and you know in the same way that startups aren't getting 10 term sheets
00:35:08
now that maybe they get one or two if they're a good company same thing with talent right they're not going to have
00:35:12
10 job offers they might have one or two and that's going to create that's not going to create the same
00:35:18
upward pressure continuing upward pressure for um for increases in comp um to your point about like will sas
00:35:26
contracts be cut i mean i think software is pretty sticky i mean if it's a good product
00:35:32
um will deal cycles get longer yes will there be more mortality risk in the startup or smb customer bases of
00:35:42
companies yes i think one concept that starts may want to wrap their heads around is what i would call deferred
00:35:50
mortality risk meaning that during the last few years during the boom times the graduation rate from c to series a to
00:35:57
series b was very high perhaps artificially high so there's a lot of companies that got funded and advanced
00:36:02
to the next round where in more normal times they wouldn't have made it so got it now if those
00:36:08
companies haven't really fixed their issues they've just deferred the mortality so i think all of us probably
00:36:14
in saselian need to be modeling out higher logo churn for uh for customer bases that are skewed
00:36:23
towards startups or smbs and we don't know what those numbers are going to be yet
00:36:27
but that is likely to happen i think that that's right i think the other thing is that um there are there's
00:36:32
a lot of companies that are going to have to get religion on free cash flow conversion asap
00:36:37
and i just think that most ceos to be very blunt are poorly educated and enumerate
00:36:45
so their level of numeracy to even understand this is pretty poor and most uh board directors are equally
00:36:53
can you unpack it right now what does it mean to to get the business uh to free cash flow what does it take why is it
00:37:00
important and what what are the how do those businesses look differently to them to spend less
00:37:06
than you make okay hold on i just want to make sure i got it correct you make money but the number of the
00:37:13
money you make is higher than the number of the money you spend got it okay and then there's a delta
00:37:18
there there's some difference between those two numbers and that number is important to some people is what you're
00:37:22
saying i think increasingly getting that number to be greater than zero is going to be really important
00:37:30
it it allows you again everybody starts to throw out this whole thing which is oh my god you can never slow growth and
00:37:37
the company will die and yeah maybe in a vacuum that that's true but when every other company is
00:37:43
fighting tooth and nail to survive the only thing that you need to do is actually survive by surviving you win
00:37:50
and if you can basically make your cash last as long as possible even if you cut to
00:37:55
the bone and stop growing if you come out the other end and you're the only company that's left you will
00:38:02
win and run over the market you may have pushed to the right a few years your plans of world dominance but they're
00:38:08
still available to you it's the company that foolishly thinks that they can continue to spend money at
00:38:13
the same rate or in the same ways that are going to learn this hard lesson because i think that
00:38:19
investors are not going to tolerate being able to you know provide incremental capital to
00:38:26
organizations funds who are then you know misallocating that capital to basically support a poorly
00:38:34
marked portfolio and i think that is going to be the real come to jesus that actually makes all of this thing come
00:38:39
clean like pension funds family offices endowments all these organizations are smart enough to realize that they're
00:38:47
giving good money after bad if what those folks are going to do is not demand portfolio rehabilitation and
00:38:53
instead are just going to basically keep the marks of their old funds because they're just in a in a game of waiting
00:38:59
it out where the whole taking action greater than you know blind hope and just going you know steady doing what
00:39:07
you've been doing you got to make some changes i mean look i love brad's reaction i think that
00:39:12
most growth-oriented funds are looking at their portfolios and they're trying to balance two
00:39:18
strategies strategy one is get into massive rehabilitation mode the problem is most of these people have never built
00:39:24
or run a company so they have no idea how to rehabilitate anything they're you know market momentum folks and in
00:39:30
that they were excellent but in actually helping ceos build and rebuild a business i think that they're not as
00:39:35
well suited doesn't mean they can't do it but they're not as well suited that's path a
00:39:41
but i think that path is very painful and it requires you to take medicine the bitter medicine which is to basically
00:39:47
mark your portfolio down 50 or 60 just like the public market terminal valuations have gone down
00:39:53
the other alternative is to basically raise enough money to do for example unpriced converts into
00:40:00
those same companies so that you don't have to remark so that the auditors will be allowed to carry these fake
00:40:06
valuations you can maybe mark it down 10 or 15 percent but you don't have to mark
00:40:10
it down 50 or 60 and hope the market returns to his previous state but as we've all talked about
00:40:18
that previous state is probably unreliable because it was a moment where we had a global pandemic where we took
00:40:24
rates to zero and we printed nine or ten trillion dollars of excess liquidity that
00:40:29
inflated these things so i got to think that you know prices in 2019 were a little bit ticking up 2020
00:40:38
we're really ticking up 2021 was egregious in 2022 is to come is you know where it all comes home to roost
00:40:45
uh brad explain to us uh we we hear free cash flow we hear income net income ebitda we hear all these terms now free
00:40:54
cash flow is what everybody is focused on i i believe that seems to be the predominant um
00:41:01
rallying cry in a lot of public market companies now can you explain to people what the difference between these things
00:41:06
are because people kind of bundle them together why would somebody like dara at uber
00:41:11
just say hey you know we've been talking about adjusted ebitda ebitda income net
00:41:15
income all this stuff but free cash flow is what we want to focus on now or is that correct yeah you know and our
00:41:20
friend bill gurley uh rails on this adjusted adjusted and you know look to your left look to your right adjust it
00:41:27
one more time ebitda right like in markets like this what people want to know or what's the green stuff i can
00:41:33
take out of the business and put under my mattress free cash flow distributable free cash
00:41:38
flow and not only that how much per share i think the single biggest issue growth
00:41:45
investors are focused on today is the easy way out for all these companies they'll tap down a little bit
00:41:51
on their hiring they'll tap down on their spend but out of the back door they want to give a bunch of free stock
00:41:56
to employees to help offset that pain this is really important to understand because stock is a real expense
00:42:05
right when a company goes public the more shares you have the lower your price so it is a real expense to
00:42:11
everybody the founders the employees the investors right and so what's what i think the
00:42:17
single biggest conversation going on in boardrooms in silicon valley today is hey
00:42:22
can we have a little bit more stock this year whether it's options or whether it's
00:42:26
outright rsus to give to employees because if we don't give it to employees they tell us they're going to leave
00:42:32
this is a real hard truth i had a ceo of an incredible company call me and say listen
00:42:39
we pay our engineers a million bucks ahead but we give them stock that over the last five years has been worth another
00:42:46
million dollars each year so they built their lives as though they had two million dollars a year in
00:42:52
income they bought a house they bought cars they sent their kids to private based upon that two million dollars and
00:42:59
now when we tell them that this upcoming year the mil we're not making whole on that
00:43:05
million it can't be when when we win you win and when we when we lose you win so the tough conversation is we're not
00:43:12
re-upping you because the stock's been cut in half and so now that engineer's saying yeah but this year that means i'm
00:43:19
only getting paid 1.2 million and the answer the tough answer is yes right shared sacrifice you should have
00:43:27
never assumed that that was going to be worth an incremental million dollars a year but that takes leadership that
00:43:33
takes courage that takes a board that knows what they're doing to explain that over the full arc of that employment and
00:43:40
the first thing the mercenary employee says is well i'll just go work somewhere else
00:43:45
and the right answer for a good leader is okay if you've got your approach to this
00:43:50
business then you need to go work somewhere else i mean you just did a great test right that's a great filter
00:43:56
you you uh you're a mercenary and you know you were with us when we're up but you're not with us when we have to take
00:44:02
some austerity measures is this the end of entitlement across the board sacks i mean we had an entitlement class
00:44:08
everybody thought they could raise a vc fund everybody thought they would have 100 irr because they would just buy nfts
00:44:13
and flip crypto projects that had no released product and the same with employees they just
00:44:19
thought i can just keep you know raising my salary x amount and now it looks like apple said everybody comes
00:44:25
back to work three days a week and we don't see a lot of people quitting apple because there may not be another option
00:44:31
and maybe a lot of the firings that are occurring i'm thinking of cameo here had
00:44:36
top three of their top like six or seven leaders leave i interpreted that as maybe they had
00:44:42
really big comp packages and when they did the layoffs they said you know what the number twos in these positions can
00:44:47
get the job done for a third of the price maybe that's better for the business so
00:44:52
is this the end of austerity the end of entitlement i think so or a lot of it there was a great article here uh in
00:45:00
well that was that came out recently about netflix where netflix they're finally getting real about their kind of
00:45:06
entitled and their woken title employee problem and this is in the new york post but
00:45:11
there's many other newspapers that covered it basically it says here netflix tells woke workers to
00:45:16
quit if they're offended if you find it hard to support our content breath netflix may not be the best place for
00:45:22
you said the memo so period full stop yeah they're just sick of it they're just not gonna put up
00:45:27
with it anymore they're sick of being held hostage by their employees who think that they can kind of muscle
00:45:33
the leaders of the company by starting a petition or boycott campaign every time
00:45:37
they want to drive the company in a certain direction and so i think companies are finally figuring out this
00:45:42
is the only way to react to basically being held hostage if you don't like it quit if you don't have seven eight job
00:45:49
offers you know and recruiters calling you constantly because everybody's on a hiring freeze well then maybe people
00:45:54
will appreciate the contract of i work for you you give me money and then everything else is
00:46:00
superfluous on that note did anybody see the ricky's your vase netflix special yet
00:46:06
netflix it's on netflix it's unbelievable i mean dave chappelle you know in terms of bravery ricky
00:46:15
gervais was like i've already made my money i'm burning the whole building down i mean he went full
00:46:22
equal opportunist and i mean i think the trans issue became like 10 or 20 percent of the of his
00:46:29
latest special so it does seem like the comedians are saying you know what we're gonna make
00:46:34
jokes we're gonna make jokes about everybody we're not gonna buy into this you can't cancel us we're just gonna
00:46:39
keep making jokes and we're gonna keep making money and and that whole concept that
00:46:44
you know people are going to be held hostage i think is over independent of what you think of making jokes of you
00:46:49
know various marginalized or smaller groups of people can we chris go back to something brad
00:46:55
said a while back about how mansion saved the democratic party because i think there's actually an interesting
00:47:00
point there yeah yeah such notorious right-wingers as jeff bezos have said something very
00:47:05
similar lately when uh do you see that where buy biden tried to blame billionaires for
00:47:11
the inflation and bezos was having none of it he said no listen it's not because
00:47:15
of us or our companies because you printed too much money and joe biden or he said mansion saved you from yourself
00:47:22
because it would have been another 4 trillion of spending on top of all the other trillions of spending that we had
00:47:27
last year so it's absolutely the case that that if the administration was left just to own
00:47:33
devices remember they were touting back in december they were touting the idea that this 4 trillion of buildback better
00:47:39
spending would somehow be the cure to inflation imagine if they had poured that gasoline onto the fire i mean we
00:47:44
would go to 20 inflation we might have had a currency uh you know like a serious currency
00:47:50
issue no yeah but let me just finish the points i don't want to just make a partisan point here i want to there's
00:47:55
there's a serious economics point here with or learning i hope our policymakers learn from this which is what happened
00:48:01
over the last couple of years we had 10 trillion dollars of money printing right
00:48:06
why they do that they thought that they could stimulate our way out of this covid recession that they had induced
00:48:12
with lockdowns in any event the point is they thought they could stimulate economic activity by printing money and
00:48:18
maybe cynically politically they thought it'd be good for them in the midterms what actually happened that 10 trillion
00:48:23
goes into the economy but there's no corresponding increase in the output of goods and services so two things happen
00:48:30
first price levels rise and we get inflation and second we get an asset bubble in the stock market and then the
00:48:36
way both those things sort of come crashing down to earth is the fed looks at this inflation and
00:48:42
suddenly has to jack up interest rates that pops the asset bubble it vaporizes something like 14 of global wealth and
00:48:49
then simultaneously workers feel a lot poorer because their wages haven't kept up with inflation so this whole idea
00:48:55
that you can just print money as a way to create wealth and prosperity i hope what we take away from this i think
00:49:02
recession that we're going into is that is not a viable strategy the only thing that creates wealth in a society is the
00:49:08
output of goods and services that people want and you just can't try to sort of play games with that by
00:49:16
creating phantom the sort of phantom money that doesn't represent a real increase in good
00:49:21
services or productivity yeah it's hard for people not to take this all as partisan but if you just look at the
00:49:27
objective facts the last two administrations have printed money like drunken sellers and
00:49:32
it's a mess right now so you you can divorce yourself from any conception that this is partisan
00:49:38
trump spent a [ __ ] ton of money and so did uh biden and who's more qualified than
00:49:43
trump and biden elon bezos the people who appear on this podcast we have much more
00:49:48
of a pulse on what's happening in the actual real economy and in entrepreneurship and capital allocating
00:49:53
than these people and i love the fact that now you know bezos is a [ __ ] poster he just
00:49:59
doesn't get he doesn't care uh and i think we're having like an honest discussion now right one of the one of
00:50:04
the areas where i i don't think elon gets enough credit is when he explains macroeconomics i
00:50:10
think he actually really understands the the what an economy is i mean an economy
00:50:16
is basically a trading system for the production of goods and services if you were to go this point he's made if you
00:50:22
were to go to a desert island and somebody just gives you a billion dollars when you're sitting there on
00:50:27
that island you can't buy anything it doesn't make you wealthier what makes you wealthier is the
00:50:32
production of goods and services that people want and that's ultimately what an economy is
00:50:37
money is just the accounting system the dollar's just the accounting system if you start printing lots of money all
00:50:42
you're doing is debasing the accounting system it doesn't make anyone richer and
00:50:45
yet you know the way that conversations around economics really take place the only thing you ever hear
00:50:52
about is stimulating demand you never really hear anything about production and i mean this is an old debate that
00:50:58
goes back to the 1980s about you know supply side economics but regardless of what you call it wealth ultimately comes
00:51:05
from our capacity to produce goods and services that people want it's a great point chamath all this adds up to
00:51:12
companies and the government's balance sheet becoming tighter and more efficient so the talent
00:51:20
diffusion across the industry perhaps everybody being entitled and getting overpaid uh people not wanting to go to
00:51:26
work people who have jobs not wanting to go to the office all of this seems to have
00:51:30
actually reversed in three months so this medicine we're taking we stopped eating the bad food we started working
00:51:38
out we're getting better sleep this is going to turn around for the the companies that take the medicine the
00:51:43
management teams the capital allocators who do the hard work and sharpen their pencils as we've talked about
00:51:48
this will all result in a more efficient uh and vibrant economy yes i think for the most part i think
00:51:55
there's still going to continue to be examples of folks who basically run themselves into a brick wall because
00:52:00
they don't want to make the hard decisions that is going to be more exaggerated in
00:52:05
silicon valley because we have a culture of tolerance and we have an economic business model
00:52:11
that supports kind of irresponsible decision making and supports poor governance you know
00:52:19
look i i've said this many times but a fund's job ultimately is to make a very important decision
00:52:26
about whether they truly care about generating massive returns or whether the fee income becomes so
00:52:33
meaningful so as to drown out every other incentive that they have and i think by and large in silicon
00:52:40
valley if you track all of the increased frequency and fundraising you can also probably follow those
00:52:49
dollars and they generally will be the most poorly run uh they'll be held the least accountable
00:52:57
and i think those will have the largest negative outcomes and then instead if you follow the
00:53:03
dollars of the the real practitioners who have discipline they look kind of sheepish and silly for years in
00:53:11
the middle of a rally but they're the ones that are able to really reset and help some of these few
00:53:17
companies really win and i think that you're going to go through that cycle over the next
00:53:21
four or five years and so you know i think it's super well said smoth because i have felt at or
00:53:29
i've been made to feel silly by some folks who said why are you asking to do diligence why do you want to have a
00:53:34
board seat why do you want to talk to customers why are you asking for month-by-month revenue you made a
00:53:40
sub-economic decision like the idea that over the last four or five years you optimized for anything except the market
00:53:46
beta was kind of dumb you know and it's and and the worst thing that you could have done in that
00:53:51
period was confuse alpha and beta meaning alpha is what you are able to do because of your discrete skill
00:54:00
versus anybody else beta is when just the market goes up said differently you could take any nba
00:54:07
player and put them on uh a high school basketball team and they would be the you know college
00:54:14
player of the year any single one okay that's beta yeah if you then can be the mvp of the
00:54:20
mba that's alpha yeah okay and i think that a lot of folks um were made to feel very silly or
00:54:30
you know a downer or a wet blanket um in these last few years who will probably have the last laugh
00:54:37
it's been unbelievable brad to watch the changing of attitudes and the entitlement in fundraising and private
00:54:44
markets in the last 60 days and it's been even more pronounced in the last 30. i literally have people we talked to
00:54:51
last month who had really crazy expectations they've come down by 50 they wanted 50 now they're at 25. they
00:54:59
didn't want board seats now they're okay with board seats information rights they
00:55:02
were fighting against information rights i don't know why that's a hill to die on
00:55:06
now they're like information rights yeah sure here's our cfo's email we need to get money in the doors
00:55:11
so um i guess what's the silver lining here it does seem to me as a great setup right now wait jason let me ask you a
00:55:17
question hold on yeah michael ordered brad like and then you're forgetting one other key thing in in the in the race to
00:55:23
raise all of this money what did these folks do they hired these mid-level kids as partners into their venture firms and
00:55:32
gave them money to put into companies what do these people know no mentoring i'm not saying it
00:55:37
disparagingly i'm just like what do they know how do they know how to actually invest investing is just not you see it
00:55:43
you just say okay well i think it sounds cool there are some of those uh younger folks who are going to turn out
00:55:50
to be all-stars and they're just like in the nba and they're going to be some that you know prove to be writing the
00:55:55
beta but let me answer jason's question because you know maybe end on a on a note of
00:56:00
optimism you know in some countries you know notably china right now they're doing a lot to prop up a bunch of
00:56:07
companies that should be allowed to fail right one of the beautiful things about
00:56:11
free market capitalism the creative destruction the cycle time on creative destruction
00:56:17
in this country has never been faster right make no mistake about it if you took money at a valuation over a billion
00:56:25
dollars okay last year you're not that's not a venture capital bet i call it quasi public
00:56:34
right you stepped into the bigs and you said i will deliver this plan and if you don't deliver the plan
00:56:41
there's not going to be a lot of tolerance there's not going to be tolerance for just giving away a bunch
00:56:46
of more stock there's not going to be tolerance for no course correction right maybe in seed or series a
00:56:54
right there's a lot of tolerance because you sign up to a lot of unpredictability
00:56:59
but the level of tolerance that you'll see out of late stage growth investors is going to be akin to what they do with
00:57:06
a public company that runs them off a cliff you know how that is you've been on those earning calls so i think this
00:57:13
is going to shine a light on the bifurcation that we really have we call all of this venture capital
00:57:20
but the truth of the matter is series c and before is venture once you're stepping into the bigs and
00:57:26
taking money at a billion to billions the expectations are different your access to capital will be different um
00:57:33
the expected course correction will be different right but i take it as a um i take it as a sign of strength
00:57:41
that we're going to work through this we're going to have you know the the private markets are absolutely going to
00:57:46
go through a reset but we'll get through it and the winners will win and those who fail to course correct and want to
00:57:51
fly into the wall will do that and we'll get on with the next generation of incredible entrepreneurs solving big
00:57:57
problems the secular curve of technology solving big problems has never been steeper
00:58:03
right and the cycles that overlay that secular curve are not suspended we have not suspended wars we
00:58:11
have not suspended economic cycles and so we're going to have to get through this one it's happening in record pace
00:58:17
exactly actually that's an interesting point i want to let me ask brad a question about that which is what's the
00:58:22
potential here for more of like a v-shaped recession where to your point the market's correct
00:58:28
more rapidly and violently than ever snap misses of you know issues a new forecast down 40 percent
00:58:35
um is there a possibility that this thing gets resolved in say six months that's
00:58:40
not to say that uh valuation levels are ever back to where they were you know in the second
00:58:45
half of 2021 but in six months could we have sort of done this big reset washed out a lot of the problems
00:58:53
and um you know again valuations are not back but the market becomes the the capital markets become become unfrozen
00:59:00
and we're back to a more normal operating environment as opposed to say yeah as opposed to say like more of a u
00:59:07
where we're kind of bouncing around the bottoms here in this volatile state for about 18 months
00:59:13
um you know and then it's more like the dot-com crash we come out of it in two years i see smart people on both sides
00:59:19
of this i hear jason lemkin's been saying i think this is kind of short deep sweet six month reset
00:59:25
fred wilson just wrote 18 months at least i think sequoia is saying two years i mean i think our instinct is 18
00:59:32
months to two years but what do you think the possibility is that we could be in a more normal environment in six
00:59:37
months right so let's let's separate public markets and venture markets because venture markets as you know have
00:59:43
a six to 12 month lag just in terms of the reset but i would say you know the future's a
00:59:48
distribution of probable outcomes there's a downside case an upside case in a base case i think the base cases by
00:59:55
this fall will have very good evidence right of where inflation's rolling over i think it is rolling over what the fed
01:00:02
is likely to do the upward bound on on interest rates and i think we'll be at a point where we can start underwriting to
01:00:08
the five-year average again make no mistake about it the s p and the nasdaq today are still
01:00:16
30 above where they were in january of 2020 30 above where they were in january 2020. how much better is the world today
01:00:27
than where it was in january 2020. well i think what the market is saying is that we've grown the economy on a
01:00:34
nominal basis about 15 during that time and earnings have about doubled right the earnings margins of those companies
01:00:42
are about have about doubled so you would expect normal course and trajectory maybe that
01:00:47
those companies would be 30 percent more valuable the problem is as we look ahead
01:00:52
to chamas point the earnings are likely to come down profit margins are being squeezed so i
01:00:58
think there's a decent argument there's more pain to come in the public markets that we
01:01:03
haven't seen the bottom however i do think that the fed is taking a good course here i don't think that we have
01:01:09
runaway inflation i think that um you know we're going to have an investable environment come this fall however i
01:01:16
think for venture there's a six to a 12 month lag to that so i think you got to add it to those six months to really get
01:01:24
to the market clearing prices for all these companies but i think it's incumbent upon all of us to give really
01:01:30
good feedback today and i see a lot of it right to entrepreneurs about making that
01:01:35
course correction if they're only turning the plane 10 degrees when they see lightning dead ahead they're making
01:01:42
a huge mistake the default action by every founder today should be a 90 degree course
01:01:48
correction unless they have very good idiosyncratic reason in that business in terms of their outperformance to stay
01:01:56
the course plan for the worst hope for the best yeah and yeah you could even bifurcate
01:02:04
the companies in private markets to ones that have strong product market fit and
01:02:09
the ones that don't there's a lot of companies to david's point that we're getting series b's without product
01:02:14
market fit you know it's it's one thing to get your series a when you have this like weak product market fit and a great
01:02:19
story but when you start seeing series b's happening on momentum it's like that to me is is is going to be
01:02:26
impossible to resolve that company has to go to zero or has to reset or give even give money back to founders those
01:02:31
are the really the three things i would see as a true bottom like the really dark moment where people have two or
01:02:37
three liquidation preferences people reset reset comp and tell people listen we're going to cut comp 30 across the
01:02:43
board for management if you don't like it leave and then finally people saying you know
01:02:48
what we're going to give the 60 cents on the dollar back to investors those are the three things i saw during
01:02:54
the two downturns you're saying something that i think is also important that's not really talked about which is
01:02:58
that there's going to be a lot of really good companies with really horrible capital structures
01:03:03
really terrible cap tables really bad valuations really big overhangs of preference stock
01:03:10
that are going to have to get worked out and in getting that worked out going back to
01:03:15
what brad said the person that course corrects 90 degrees will win and the reason they'll win may
01:03:21
not even because they're being that courageous they're just being less stupid than everybody else quite
01:03:26
honestly because you have to remember in most of these markets over the last four
01:03:29
or five years we funded four or five versions of every imaginable company right and there's going to be two
01:03:36
winners 70 and 30 yeah and and there's really only going to be one winner and then there's going to be a marginal
01:03:42
second kind of also rant that captures some value and everybody else is not that valuable and you know that's
01:03:49
roughly been true but the reason we were able to support that was that every company looked kind of interesting
01:03:54
anyone with traction could be you know competed against because the only differentiator at the
01:04:00
time was very cheap money that was effectively free and it was flowing in you know faster than you could count
01:04:06
so all of that has to get sorted out so i just think that that those dynamics shouldn't be ignored and so you know
01:04:12
again hard work too i mean to the thing we've been saying here the it's hard work for a board and founders to do this
01:04:17
but what choice do you have well the problem is the pro if you take much more sophisticated markets like the debt
01:04:23
markets which i would say are much more sophisticated okay cutthroat liquid covenants when you see the people that
01:04:31
make the money two things are true number one is their incredibly sharp elbow to number two is
01:04:36
they make money in moments like this right if you look at apollo's great returns or blackstone's great returns or
01:04:42
cerebrus you know these folks were the you know they they really were the barbarians at the gates and they made
01:04:48
all the money in moments of true dislocation if you apply that construct here you
01:04:54
know we've never had to go through a period where there are some real terms and conditions attached to the
01:05:00
incremental dollar and i think that if that does come to pass in silicon valley you're just going
01:05:05
to have a reckoning and i think that that what it will really do is just sort out
01:05:10
the winners and the losers and it will sort out the folks that were able to get to default or close to default to live
01:05:15
or at least default life support exactly default festival i like that one too i mean zach's made a great tweet he
01:05:23
basically said it's not default alive or dead investible or not and that's an even finer filter
01:05:29
default default alive is fantastic if you can get there basically just means cash flow positive i mean all default
01:05:35
alive means is that your cash flow positive or you're going to be cash flow positive based on the money you have you
01:05:40
don't need money exactly you don't need money well of course that's the best place to be is you don't need money but
01:05:44
i think you know for early stage companies that's almost an impossible standard you know it takes time to get
01:05:50
to the point of encounter positive so therefore i was trying to propose a standard that i thought was more
01:05:55
actionable for founders because it was because it wasn't impossible and i call it default investible which is here are
01:06:02
the metrics that you need at least i can tell you what they are in the sas world
01:06:06
you know here's what great metrics look like here's what good metrics look like here's some danger zone metrics and you
01:06:12
need you know out of the five key metrics you really need three or four great ones and one or two good ones to
01:06:17
raise in this environment and no dangerous metrics and if you don't have those you need to give yourself the time
01:06:23
to fix the problems in your business to get to those metrics um on that note you
01:06:28
know sequoia had a really good chart called survival the quickest that illustrates this concept of giving
01:06:33
yourself time and i threw it in the chat um but basically what it shows is there's a
01:06:39
green line and an orange line that the green line is the company that realizes in may of 2022 that we've gone into a
01:06:46
very different environment and they slash their burn in half and they basically double their runway
01:06:53
and then there's the other company that just keeps going along the same path they were at
01:06:57
until they realize oh wait a second you know and then that you know some point in the future they realize there's
01:07:02
been a change they make a small cut they make another small cut and they're always behind the eight ball and i've
01:07:07
seen this so many times before that the company doesn't make cuts until they're forced to
01:07:13
and so they never really lengthen their runway and then when they finally do make the cuts they go into a death
01:07:17
spiral and die and now they're over the atlantic and there's not enough fuel to get to a landing strip and you just
01:07:23
plunge into the cold ocean and die founders really have to think about the the asymmetry of the risk that they face
01:07:30
right which is let's say that you cut too much and the environment is better than you think it's going to be well you
01:07:37
can always hire back i probably have a lower price in all likelihood i promise you'll be able to hire back okay but on
01:07:42
the other hand if you don't cut enough and the situation is worse than you think then you just die
01:07:48
so you this is why andy gross said only the paranoid survive you've got to think about the downside risk and be
01:07:55
more skewed towards the bad scenario than sort of the the sort of wishful thinking scenario okay survive
01:08:03
just just one final point here you know because we have all these decks flying around now by venture capitalists
01:08:09
telling founders to go make these really tough decisions being a little self-reflective
01:08:17
where were we all six months ago where were we in october when we were putting more money in and they were
01:08:23
hiring like crazy where were we in november right i remember some of the conversations that
01:08:29
we were having but i look i posted in in chat layoffs.fyi right the number one company on that
01:08:37
list gets here sequoia company okay are they making a course correction you bet your ass they are they're laying
01:08:44
of 4 500 people 15 of the workforce the second company on that list lace work an altimeter software company
01:08:52
that's doing terrific growing hundreds of percent laying off 300 people 20 right a 90 degrees turn of the plane
01:09:02
right that company will never need cash again but it's not just flying toward the lightning they're making the tough
01:09:08
decisions because that's what leaders do in businesses that are even good businesses there are a lot of companies
01:09:14
that are ship businesses that should be on this list but they're bumbling along and not making the tough decisions we
01:09:20
need venture capitalists that instead of you know this being a popularity contest
01:09:26
venture capitalists need to look inside as well and say what about our firm didn't didn't work right why weren't we
01:09:34
issuing these course corrections and telling people to tap the brakes a little bit when we knew markets were
01:09:40
overheated last year right and so i think there's there's a lot of responsibility that sits on both
01:09:45
sides of the table um but i'm you know there's 714 startups on this list by the time we're done there are going to be at
01:09:53
least 3 000 startups out of zero that's another reason i say the fed is getting what it wants right
01:10:00
this labor market is you know was cooling down very quickly at least in silicon valley well i mean
01:10:06
and the fact that people felt like they didn't need to take a job and they could
01:10:09
live off credit and there would always be jobs for them i think people are going to have to rethink like
01:10:14
can i be unployed forever and you know do i need to take my career seriously do i need to pay down my debt do i need to
01:10:20
have a a balanced uh balance sheet do i need to my personal balance sheet needs to be in
01:10:26
order as well i think that's what individual workers need to think about yeah i mean
01:10:31
brad's right that there's certainly enough blame to go around in the ecosystem and you know vcs bought into
01:10:37
these frothy evaluation levels last year to some degree we're all gaslit by by the fed and these low interest rate
01:10:43
policies i wrote my post about burn multiple and how to measure capital efficiency two years ago
01:10:49
um it's getting a lot more retweets now than it did back then but uh but look i do vcs have some
01:10:55
self-reflecting to do definitely but you know i'm seeing a lot of tweets going around basically saying
01:11:00
like people objecting to this advice on the grounds you'll hear something like if you
01:11:06
vcs wanted us to operate more efficiently then you should have invested more efficiently or if you
01:11:13
wanted us to be disciplined you should have been more disciplined in your investing and to me that's kind of
01:11:18
missing the point it's kind of cutting off your nose despite your face the reason we're giving this advice is
01:11:23
because we just want our companies to survive and we don't want a zero we don't want a zero we've been through
01:11:28
multiple down cycles and the truth of matter is unless you've been in the business world for over 14 years you've
01:11:34
never been through a down cycle i mean that means that you know no founder under the age of
01:11:40
what like 36 has even seen a down cycle before they don't know what it can be like when you go into a
01:11:47
two-year nuclear they probably they probably weren't the pilots at that time anyway so it's more like people who are
01:11:51
40 45 have the scar tissue because they were in the pilot seat totally totally so the reason you're hearing all these
01:11:57
vcs all of a sudden say get more discipline this is mainly because we've seen this movie before and we don't want
01:12:04
to run out of money and die i think you can safely short if you could the stock of all of these
01:12:12
rando peanut gallery ceos tweeting their disdain on twitter if you're a writer it would be a great
01:12:18
index fixing stuff just write that company to zero yeah just turn your [ __ ] twitter
01:12:24
back and just sharpen your pencils um i i we we would be remiss if we didn't talk about uh at least for this last
01:12:31
segment about the tragedy in uvalde uvalde texas uh 80 miles west of san antonio tuesday
01:12:39
19 elementary kids two adults were murdered um how are we gonna talk about this without losing our
01:12:46
[ __ ] it's really hard i think maybe the roadmap tremendously i did give this a
01:12:50
lot of thought i was like why why is this first segment on the market trundling along on [ __ ] life support
01:12:56
for an hour and ten minutes and i think part of it is because none of us can really talk about this without losing
01:13:00
our cool it's really hard and but i do think we did good work chamath i was thinking about the good work we did
01:13:07
in the episode of roe v wade and we actually came to a point where we said you know here are the extreme positions
01:13:13
and then you're like hey wait a second i found this data point i found this data
01:13:15
point we actually figured out hey 80 percent of people want this definition of abortion in the united states so i
01:13:24
i'll throw it to you tomorrow you know we're all outraged we're all frustrated but maybe we could start there is there
01:13:30
a consensus of what could be accomplished here that you've come to i've started to
01:13:35
think about it a whole bunch but you know we're all outraged we could all yell and
01:13:39
scream here but a path forward is where my mind goes i'll just tell you what i what i
01:13:45
um have been thinking about okay this is just a random stream of consciousness let's do it
01:13:53
i think that the democrats will not make any progress because they try to make this unfortunately
01:14:04
a moral virtue signaling issue the republicans will not make any progress because they
01:14:13
become sort of very binary adamant absolutists about constitutional rights and the interpretation of that right in
01:14:20
a very specific way the truth is in the middle you know if you go back before we talk
01:14:27
about yuvaldi um peyton johndron who was the kid that shot up at tops supermarket in buffalo and
01:14:34
killed umpteen you know black shoppers lived in a state where there was a red flag law for those that don't understand
01:14:44
what red flag laws are david you know tweeted some stuff about it as well but essentially it allows a community member
01:14:50
or a family member or a school uh teacher or a police officer to essentially put
01:14:56
a restraining order around an individual that they think could cause harm and use that as a way to
01:15:02
confiscate their weapons people have talked about red flag laws as being possible while he lived in a state the
01:15:08
kid was you know put under a cycle you know a year ago and it it all just falls through the
01:15:14
cracks now you know ted cruz or somebody else said let's spend 10 billion dollars and
01:15:19
only have one door into a school and put an armed guard there well then you find
01:15:23
out that yuvaldi you know doubled their security spend over the last two or three years they actually had a person
01:15:32
that may or may not have just kind of like stepped to the side or something to let
01:15:35
them in the police according to the uh ap showed up and stood around for 40 minutes before they were able to
01:15:43
actually breach the school you know so much so that the quote in the ap article was that there was a parent that
01:15:49
tried to get other parents to for 40 minutes they were standing there you know in california you have you know
01:15:57
very restrictive measures um but we've had you know in san bernardino and other places we've had
01:16:03
mass shootings here as well because the guns can just get transported across state lines and there's there's no real
01:16:07
way to stop this the nra i find out just so if you guys are interested uh mitt romney took 13.6 million dollars
01:16:16
from the nra this is the moral finger wagger of the republican side who you know last time i checked is a
01:16:24
multi-sentient millionaire but somehow still needs to take 13 million from these folks
01:16:29
rich burr took 7 million roy blunt 4.5 million tom tillis 4.4 million cory gardner 4 million marco rubio 3.3
01:16:37
million there's no effective counter lobby that says how about we have a more moderate and
01:16:44
restrained pro-gun set of rights and field candidates on the left and the right that could jason find this middle ground
01:16:53
and so you know we're in this two or three day period it seems like where folks will
01:16:59
get extreme and then nothing will happen here's one thing that i think we can all
01:17:04
agree as well if you look at the underlying family situation of all of these mass shooters
01:17:11
there is a really disturbing theme that i think is worth putting out there these are all universally young men
01:17:18
18 19 odd years old they come from broken families this individual salvatore ramos
01:17:27
father was absent again according to the times in the wall street journal article i read mother
01:17:33
intermittent drug use issues lived with the grandmother bullied they're unemployed barely graduated if
01:17:39
graduated at all in high school they harbored these deep resentments towards women or minority groups
01:17:46
um they then project a lot of their frustration they were bullied potentially in high
01:17:51
school growing up and all of the they were posting all kinds of very challenging content you know apparently
01:17:59
this kid had a one tick talk of where he sat in a car with a dead cat in a paper
01:18:04
bag you know he would post on instagram of assault rifles and nothing happens so
01:18:11
i just think that we have to acknowledge that there's a complete failure of our politicians
01:18:18
and at this point i think they should all be replaced writ large every single one
01:18:23
nobody has added value to this solution is nobody has really tried to figure this out
01:18:28
but then also like parents have to do something incrementally more from the perspective of the community
01:18:36
because these kids are going to school with our kids and the red flags are there the red flags are there so just
01:18:41
one last thing and i said i said brad i said to my kids when you interact with your friends i
01:18:46
just want you to understand when you're on social media and you encounter this content
01:18:50
i hope you're never like either scared or embarrassed or unsure enough to just show somebody when this stuff is
01:18:56
happening so that you can let somebody with a little bit more maturity and judgment try to figure out what to do if
01:19:01
anything at all but these communities are completely failing uh these kids as well brad you
01:19:07
have some dead i would say that um every [ __ ] country on the planet has kids with mental health disorders
01:19:15
but not every country on the planet has kids getting shot up in schools and supermarkets and churches
01:19:23
that is a unique feature of the system that we accept this the system we created
01:19:30
right i'm not against guns you guys know i took my kids to a shooting range last weekend
01:19:36
but the idea that we let you know assault weapons be sold in this country with no background checks
01:19:46
that we let assault wipe rifles be sold in this country with no limits on magazine sizes that
01:19:53
you can just replace magazines it's total insanity right so i think this is a country that
01:20:01
does a lot to self-help but we are not self-helping here after the assassination attempt of ronald reagan
01:20:10
amazingly republicans found their voice and they said let's have an assault ban on assault weapons or let's have a
01:20:19
ban on assault weapons that expired and we as a i asked my analysts i said plot the number
01:20:27
of shootings since the expiration of that ban and it's terrifying yeah it's obvious
01:20:35
and it should be something that we just like don't accept like the middle ground
01:20:39
jason i saw what you tweeted there is an obvious middle ground right there's about whether it's
01:20:46
background checks that steve kerr i mean he's gone viral yeah feeling the same way we all feel but they're also
01:20:53
technical solutions why the hell do we let assault weapons why why not put a scrambling device on
01:21:00
these weapons so that you can't fire them in schools and churches if somebody says that's a breach of
01:21:07
their second amendment rights i'm sorry i'm also not going to allow you to drive
01:21:12
into the school yard with nuclear material there are some rational limits we can agree to
01:21:19
so i don't think this is a partisan thing at this point in time nobody's saying you know ban all guns
01:21:25
right in fact i i think there's a plurality among gun owners they too want reasonable limitations on these
01:21:34
things which are killing machines not hunting machines sex any thoughts on this yeah i mean i i so i think we're looking
01:21:41
for solutions i think these red flag laws and building on them is is the way to go um you know the the problem with
01:21:48
with background checks and and i'm not against them i mean you know i've i've gone through background checks to get
01:21:54
you know my guns and i'm in favor of them but they wouldn't have done anything to stop the buffalo shooter
01:22:00
they didn't i mean you know the buffalo shooter was in new york they've got the toughest gun control
01:22:04
laws in the nation the background check didn't stop him from getting the gun because he bought it lawfully didn't
01:22:09
have a criminal record so you know it doesn't that by itself isn't going to do it so i think where these
01:22:16
red flag laws are useful is that we've seen with these all these school shooters they have a similar kind of
01:22:22
profile right they are disturbed young men like in their who are still school age 18 19 early 20s
01:22:32
exactly now this shooter in uh uvalde i mean there are reports coming out now that he had been cutting
01:22:38
his face that he had aimed a bb gun at people so he was clearly idioting towards this
01:22:44
idea of shooting people he had posted um violent fantasies basically of mass shootings on social media and he told
01:22:54
his classmates he wanted to kill him i mean there's almost always a call for help here
01:22:58
same with the buffalo shooting i mean the people who these like psychos go to school with are the least surprised they
01:23:04
all know because these people have been warning they've been saying that they're gonna
01:23:08
do it so i think we have this problem of we've got these young psychotic people and i
01:23:14
think the reason why it happens young is when somehow they get into adulthood whatever this mental
01:23:21
illness they've got basically takes hold and they snap they become psychotic and
01:23:26
it doesn't take long for them to act on those fairness those violent fantasies so the simple solution here i think is
01:23:34
to prevent those people from getting guns you know if you threaten mass violence
01:23:39
uh you shouldn't be able to get a gun and i you know i personally don't think that's an
01:23:43
abridgement of second amendment rights because look felons can't get guns either if you commit a felony you can't
01:23:49
get a gun these people haven't committed a felony yet but i don't want to wait until they
01:23:54
do if they're if they have these kinds of red flags against them then there should be a way to file
01:24:00
to basically get a protective order perfectly if we don't we don't let 12 year olds drive cars we don't let them
01:24:05
drink beer because we don't want 12 year olds drunk driving right and then at some point there's a licensing that
01:24:10
occurs i think a lot of this is framing i think it's just once again very analogous to this abortion issue where
01:24:17
most people are pro-choice and want restrictions on abortion where they don't occur after a
01:24:23
certain number of weeks just like europe got to and i was just you know ideating on this and i think
01:24:29
replacing the nra to your point your moth they have funded people they've become a key funding
01:24:36
source for a lot of folks and they've they've been over funded themselves um what if we had americans for reasonable
01:24:41
gun safety and we have this organization raised a ton of money and they just outbid the nra for republicans uh and
01:24:48
for people who are against background checks and we just a good question but look mike bloomberg started every town
01:24:53
for gun control after newtown and it did it hasn't really had i think the impact
01:24:58
that that we wanted i mean well i think part of it is cheap what you said so let
01:25:03
me just give you my my little four bullet points here and have you react it you you are right that people
01:25:08
are absolutists no abortion you know no restrictions and no guns or no restrictions on guns background
01:25:16
checks we all agree on make them more intense and make them proportional to the caliber of the weapon if you want
01:25:22
one of these weapons why don't we have you go through a training course so for a pistol you've got a two-hour training
01:25:27
quest for an ar-15 or something that's more powerful how about an eight-hour course a four-hour course then you could
01:25:32
actually see the red flags emerge and with somebody who has this red flag issue go through that
01:25:37
the red flag laws should be national and they should be very strong and then finally what if we introduced insurance
01:25:43
for certain classes of weapons not all if you want to get a rifle you know to go hunting or a pistol for self-defense
01:25:49
maybe you don't need to have insurance or maybe if you have one you don't need to have insurance but once you get to
01:25:53
high caliber once you get to having clips that are a certain size what if we just had some
01:25:59
basic insurance because that would force then somebody to underwrite the danger of that weapon jk i mean look the trick
01:26:05
here is to figure out a system that has the least possible impact on law-abiding americans there's maybe a
01:26:12
few thousand of these um mentally highly mentally disturbed uh young men but like i said their schools know who
01:26:22
they are yeah right and what we need is a process where you know that doesn't turn into the no-fly list
01:26:29
where all of a sudden everybody's on it or uh training or insurance or content moderation or something like that this
01:26:35
is the problem look this is what the nra is afraid of is that you create a red flag process and all of a sudden
01:26:40
thousands or millions of people could be on it right so you need a right but that's not true because you had you had
01:26:46
this kid who could have been put on it in in new york he wasn't right no no no look i think we need to i think we need
01:26:51
to figure out how do you create due process around this and i i think i think if a school they know i mean you
01:26:58
get multiple affidavits from a teacher they should be put on the list yeah school is a no-brainer
01:27:04
the problem isn't that these these kids aren't identifiable because as you say david they're hiding in plain sight in
01:27:09
these schools the problem is that there's no mechanism or incentive for any of these kids
01:27:15
parents educators teachers community members to do something about it because they don't know what that something is
01:27:22
and this is where these kids are left to fester fester fester and then and it boils over and it's all of us that have
01:27:28
to pay a collective price david can you it's even it's even worse than that chamoth because in the buffalo case the
01:27:34
the buffalo shooter was referred to for psychiatric evaluation because they thought he did have mental illness and
01:27:40
then they released him releasing after a weekend and then he got the gun he got the gun so he should have been put on a
01:27:46
red flag list and that should have been the end of it and it should be a database like a federal database which
01:27:50
they're the nra fights too yeah i also want to say something about these technology companies
01:27:55
there is an explicit decision that technology companies can make to be able to review
01:28:02
content from certain kinds of accounts and start to build a cluster and a distribution of
01:28:08
risk it is possible i helped build one for one of these companies so don't tell me
01:28:13
it's not and i i will not tolerate some non-technical person telling me it's not
01:28:17
possible it is absolutely possible and these technology companies should have a mechanism to be able to say you
01:28:24
know what here are these thousand accounts david in the united states of these thousand individuals
01:28:31
that you know are sort of getting to a red line here yeah incline whatever but it's it's also it's it's not it's not
01:28:37
just gonna be what they post on social media it's although in both cases buffalo and
01:28:42
uvalde they both posted that they were going to do what they did but in addition to that
01:28:48
breadcrumbs early warning system is a great idea with uvaldi the the cops were called out multiple times for
01:28:57
violent disturbances you know and you combine that with what he's telling people in the schools and what he's
01:29:03
posting on social media you it's there's an identifiable profile here it's not one red flag it's multiple red flags
01:29:10
where this is where these corporate social media companies need to take off all of this for-profit
01:29:18
focus that's extreme at this point be willing to degrade margins to hire the tens of thousands of people to
01:29:26
manually review content okay there should be a mechanism that allows these folks to plug into some
01:29:31
system that law enforcement can use there is an early warning system that can be built yeah earlier
01:29:38
great idea human review before this stuff gets out of control david to control people's individual civil
01:29:44
liberties okay but that is a big step forward from where we are today which is nothing there is zero
01:29:50
leadership in america can i just ask david one question david you you correctly pointed out i think it's
01:29:55
astute that um we can't penalize people who are legally getting guns or create too much
01:30:01
friction for them i understand that would you consider training or insurance and just take each
01:30:06
one individually for high capacity these deadly assault rifles would you consider
01:30:12
what would you consider each of those in terms of realistic you know having some basic training a
01:30:17
four hour training class i mean like like you do for uh like you do for driving a car should we have that for
01:30:21
assault rifles and then should insurance be required what training does is prevent accidental shootings okay that's
01:30:28
right i'm not against training i love training i do training but but look should be mandatory what
01:30:34
training prevents is is accidental shootings buffalo and uvaldi and all these school shootings they're not
01:30:39
accidental shootings they're going out there and killing as many people as possible and they know how to use these
01:30:42
weapons i mean the problem is is what their objectives are so i don't think training solves it well let me ask
01:30:48
you this if you were in training for four hours and you're an instructor and you were trained to look for red flags
01:30:53
and it brought in some friction from this person going and buying it and doing the next day wouldn't that help
01:30:58
and then going to have to buy insurance the buffalo shooter cased this this grocery store for like four months i
01:31:03
mean they are patient they are methodical in how they go about so they would have gone
01:31:08
i think so that but we don't even necessarily need that filter jake out because i'm just
01:31:12
telling you that the profiles of these psychos it's so dramatic when you go back and look i mean again multiple red
01:31:20
flags they're killing animals i just wanting bb guns they've been the cops have been called
01:31:25
out on them they're posting on social media their classmates are all terrified of them their own families are terrified
01:31:30
of them we just need to basically we need an incentive to jamaa's point for schools i
01:31:37
think to create these profiles and file the right forms the affidavits in the database now do insurance for high
01:31:43
capacity assault rifles would you be in favor of and do you think it's a viable what does that do i don't understand
01:31:48
what that does well it means you would have to apply and say hey i'm jason calacanis i'm 18 years old i'm in the
01:31:54
school i would like to apply to own an ar-15 and then some insurance companies say okay you're 18 years old you're a
01:31:59
male you live in texas your bill is going to be 600 a year for this gun oh okay you're a 45 year old
01:32:06
male in wyoming your bill is going to be 100 for this because we've done some actuary tables on the actual risk would
01:32:12
you be in favor of insurance i think the key to solving this problem is to create
01:32:16
the minimum disruption on law-abiding americans okay tens of millions of them who like
01:32:21
insurance look i don't know what that would do exactly i want to stop the basically
01:32:26
that i think what are a relatively small number of psychos young psychos maybe there's only
01:32:33
a few hundred or a few thousand sort of candidates in the entire country i i don't want i don't want to wait for them
01:32:39
to become felons to to basically prevent them from getting jobs and by the way there's a there's there's a bunch of
01:32:46
study about this there's been a lot of social science studies about the individuals that own guns
01:32:52
legally and those individuals that sort of break and commit these crimes and whether we want to admit it or not there
01:32:59
is a definable archetype it starts with gender then there's socioeconomic conditions then there's
01:33:06
you know home family conditions these are knowable things these can be built into a combination of
01:33:14
software and human review and we need to create incentives so that these kids can get some kind of help or
01:33:21
intervention and the worst case is we kind of you know do something with them in a way that
01:33:27
helps us protect everybody else because sorry to interrupt we do this every day we turn this country on its head after
01:33:35
september 11th we started profiling everybody and to sax's like minimum standard of
01:33:43
disrupting other people's lives the department of homeland security disrupted everybody's lives take off
01:33:50
your shoes go through the security before you get on a plane we changed everything in months
01:33:57
because we said we're under attack but there we're under attack by a foreign presence a foreign terrorist
01:34:04
presence here we're under attack by sick kids who need help okay but we need to disrupt our lives we
01:34:12
need to change things right in order to save these innocent kids who are being shot up in schools
01:34:18
where they're supposed to be safe and so i agree let's profile them let's get these companies doing their jobs helping
01:34:27
us identify these kids get these kids help but we need to raise the volume and raise the urgency in dc the way we did
01:34:35
after september 11 2001 that this is a national crisis as opposed to going back to the normal
01:34:43
right distribution here by the way after 2011 um i was on a no-fly list and i think i've told you guys a story before
01:34:50
but i would have the triple s on my boarding pass for years until about 2007 or 2008. um
01:34:57
constantly profiled you know put in the back room the whole nine yards but in the end you know did did it make
01:35:06
me feel kind of like less than a lot of other people yes but did i do it because
01:35:11
uh i think it was the on the broad strokes the right thing to do yeah so you would take a little friction and so
01:35:17
you know if i needed to basically turn over all my kids you know social media or there was a mechanism where you know
01:35:25
as much as we try to teach our kids you know all of these other things that that allow us to make a socially
01:35:30
progressive society if the guidance counselor also sat around and asked these kids anonymously hey is there
01:35:35
anybody in your class you think needs your help why don't you do that too um there's there is friction because
01:35:42
that that i think we're all willing to take because the counter factual is too horrible to bear
01:35:49
and this is an example of one of those things would you be in favor of insurance and training chamath
01:35:56
assault rifles i don't i think these are good ideas okay i don't think they will
01:36:01
curb the issue i do think what david said is right there's a level of evil or mental illness in these people
01:36:11
that caused them to be incredibly methodical and i think that we shouldn't underestimate
01:36:18
so they would get to the insurance screen and get through the training screening well i think i think you know
01:36:21
look there's a lot of people that drive cars without insurance right it's you can drive enough and you can be insured
01:36:27
and you know so i think that those are good ideas jason where it will falter is we have a
01:36:35
political system where the primaries for both sides are dictated by the looniest 10 percent
01:36:42
of the left and the right yeah we got a vote in our primary it makes practical gun control just like abortion an
01:36:48
impossible task unless we completely turn our political class upside down on both sides of the aisle
01:36:56
okay so i think these are good ideas but in the meantime i think parents have to
01:37:01
do something because nobody's coming to our aid and i think this the most important thing we can do is just say
01:37:07
the truth out loud there is an identifiable archetype of these we should profile these kids we should
01:37:13
profile them there's no doubt there the politicians who are making this about lawful gun ownership they're not helping
01:37:19
they're they're actually hurting because you're activating millions of americans
01:37:24
who lawfully own guns and believe in the second amendment to oppose reasonable measures
01:37:31
like like i'm saying hyper-targeted measures like these red flag laws right and so
01:37:37
if we make the whole issue about gun ownership in general you're not going to get any
01:37:42
reasonable changes the opposite the sales go up the sales go up every time we have this happen my
01:37:47
kids and i'm sure your kids as well have now uh gone through multiple active shooter drills in our school yep but at
01:37:55
no point have my kids been sat down and taught some of the warning signs of their fellow classmates and a mechanism
01:38:02
to raise their hand and say you know what this is actually really worrisome here
01:38:06
they don't have that training they do have training on how to lock the door how to flip a desk how to go into a
01:38:12
closet which is a horrible thing to have to teach a child but if we're already there i just say take the extra step and
01:38:19
teach the kids because they're living on instagram and tick tock every day they see their friends and their you know
01:38:25
classmates every day and we need to start figuring out an early warning system because what is
01:38:31
happening continues to happen these politicians are ineffective they do nothing to help parents right it's
01:38:38
true i i like i like the early warning system because you're right like they're so so first of all the the red flag laws
01:38:44
are something that's done on a state-by-state basis something like 19 states have red flag laws including new
01:38:49
york but it didn't work in new york the buffalo shooter because got one federal no one used the system no i don't think
01:38:54
it has to be federal i just think that people are actually interested i think people just have to use this system so
01:38:59
you had in the buffalo shooter the kid was referred for psychiatric treatment and they still didn't read flag him
01:39:04
that's just bonkers so people have to the school systems have to learn how to use these laws
01:39:10
and so to jamaa's point we need an early warning system we need that translating
01:39:14
into red flags that go on someone's record and then they can't buy guns after that it's it's really simple at
01:39:19
least till maybe they turn 30 or something um i mean it's it's um the the the problem is that
01:39:27
about half the states don't have this mechanism and then the half that do aren't using it effectively enough i
01:39:32
just shared with you guys a chart it the the the most pernicious part of this debate and i think this is a pretty
01:39:38
solid debate we had here so thank you to the gentleman for all participating in it um
01:39:43
is every time we have one of these gun sales spike if you look at the chart in the new york times i just shared a nick
01:39:47
you can you can share it on the youtube channel uh two million guns in the january after
01:39:51
obama's re-election the sandy hook shooting we hit peak guns obviously during coronavirus people got scared and
01:39:56
bought a bunch of guns after september 11th they bought a lot of guns but these moments are sadly going to drive
01:40:02
the ar 15 sec that is because all the conversation is about banning guns yeah and what we
01:40:08
should be doing is preventing psychos from getting guns known psychos reasonable gun control
01:40:14
increased by 50 in the last 10 years the last 10 years have been the safest 10 years in our lifetime
01:40:21
yet for some reason people feel the need to arm themselves more and more and more
01:40:26
now i as an immigrant into this country accept the rules of the country that i come to there's a constitution there's a
01:40:32
second amendment i respect people's rights to own gun i've held a gun twice once in my life i had a panic
01:40:39
attack and i had to put it down i had to so it's not for me okay but i respect your right to have them um
01:40:46
i think that we need to teach people how to think about the precursors before they get the hold of these things really
01:40:53
sadly uh what's killing our kids um it turns out i just put a i just put the tweet in the
01:41:00
chat for you guys to take a look at new england journal of medicine massive uptick now guns deaths
01:41:07
combined it's all gun deaths includes gangs includes suicide and includes mass shootings
01:41:14
but firearm related deaths and injuries now exceeds motor vehicle crashes and so
01:41:19
does opioids so we have a crisis after at new england journal of medicine just to be very honest
01:41:25
it's no it's not necessarily only about kids because they included 18 and 19 year olds in that chart sure so those
01:41:31
are adults okay young adults and kids um and so drug overdoses and firearm related are spiking massively
01:41:40
this is my point about having this debate this is being armed by the by the left and then the right says well
01:41:46
hold on it doesn't include 18 and then everybody gets caught in that hole absolutely the shooting these shootings
01:41:53
are being done by people 1819 but putting all this aside i just want to make a bigger point about our children
01:41:58
like in the last two years with this covet the spike occurred during covid of drug overdoses and firearms so there's a
01:42:05
lot of suicide in here as well so we should think holistically about you know how kids are dying oh yeah one
01:42:10
other thing to that which is we have plenty of gun laws on the books that aren't enforced right now in san
01:42:14
francisco you can't get chase abu deen to enforce a gun charge he uh a young kid named kelvin chu got killed
01:42:23
because his his killer a guy named zion young he was arrested weeks before on gun charges and jason boudin just let
01:42:30
him go and in uh la with gascon he's dropped all gun enhancements to charges the whole the whole thing so
01:42:38
you've got progressive prosecutors who aren't even prosecuting the gun laws we got on the books that's got to change
01:42:44
and ted cruz thinks this is about the back door being unlocked i mean the the stupidity across the board left to right
01:42:50
everybody in between the incompetence is stunning and it has to stop yeah but jake out look i mean if you make this
01:42:56
about people's lawful gun ownership they're going to oppose what you want to do we got to make it well there has to
01:43:00
be some incremental controls don't you agree there has to be control the controls are basically preventing known
01:43:07
psychos from getting weapons okay so you want to focus on that but to be clear no
01:43:12
additional gun control for you background checks or anything or not background checks right now i just want
01:43:17
to be clear red flag laws and background checks are good i know we have to wrap i think the consensus was around red
01:43:24
flag there's a known profile chamath articulated it well david i don't think we helped the cause
01:43:31
to build the consensus by calling a sick 16 year old kid struggling with self-identity a psycho
01:43:39
and because their their kids who live all around us this isn't about lecture this is about building consensus i think
01:43:45
we can profile those folks they clearly have psychotic uh uh challenges right but there is
01:43:53
intervention to help these kids i know a lot of kids who frankly had challenges during high school who turned out to be
01:43:59
great great human beings so these are kids at a very vulnerable age we should profile them within the community social
01:44:07
networks should help us identify these folks and we should get them help and i think you can build a reasonable
01:44:12
consensus around that yeah i agree just to explain myself i'm by when i use the word psycho i'm
01:44:18
referring to the the ones who actually became shooters you know i'm referring to those ones um you're right that if
01:44:24
we're talking about people who haven't done anything yet who are mentally ill yes we should get
01:44:29
them help so mental illness you know this is and this goes to healthcare as well we should have
01:44:36
national mental health services available freely to every american we are in a mental
01:44:41
health crisis between covid and just modern life and suicide is becoming the number one cause of death
01:44:47
sadly for many um demographics now including our kids and so while we do a great job making cars
01:44:54
safer and creating life-saving drugs and and emergency rooms and and medical attention has gotten unbelievable and
01:45:01
we're making all these uh you know great advances mental health we're not making the
01:45:06
advances we need i'm so so so sorry to all those families yeah this is just heartbreaking
01:45:12
i guess you're emotional yeah but i'm just so sorry for all those people dealing with it it's
01:45:17
heartbreaking yeah yeah heartbreaking let's take some action here enough with the thoughts and prayers let's actually
01:45:23
come up with a [ __ ] plan and just i've been profiled for years i put up with it sorry for the
01:45:29
indignity it's okay i said uh my honest perspective is there's a clustering and a technology
01:45:37
component to this that can meaningfully help and we need to start knowing that there are these patterns we
01:45:44
need to say the words out loud they are patterns for these school shooters for these mass
01:45:50
shooters those patterns can be written down they have been written down and we need to do something about it
01:45:56
they need to be codified in some form of algorithms and if we've already taught our kids how to duck and hide i think we
01:46:02
can also teach our kids how to raise their hand well before they need to learn to duck and i identify who's being
01:46:06
bullied into your point your mouth about being profiled if we profile somebody and they're not a mass shooter candidate
01:46:12
but they're just depressed or they're being bullied well that's ver that they deserve help as well so there's no
01:46:19
downside to profiling somebody who's struggling you're profiling them with the intent of getting them help
01:46:24
so let's just profile the kids who are struggling profile them for good and you you'll catch some you know who's
01:46:31
struggling a priority my point is that you actually well they're being bullied they're going to probably be struggling
01:46:35
i mean you know the kids getting bored psychographic and demographic profiles of the
01:46:40
99 of the cases that we've seen over the last two decades and all i'm encouraging
01:46:47
politicians and technology companies to do is come together create some standard
01:46:52
you know what's the downside what's the downside none zero we have mechanisms like this by the way where um you know
01:46:58
these technology companies already do these kinds of profiles on other kinds of situations you know typically you
01:47:04
need a physical request and other kinds of like legal interventions in order to unlock this data
01:47:08
but it's not as if this is uh you know antithetical to what they do in other situations they certainly do it for
01:47:14
fraud in advertising it's not as if the technological prowess of these companies
01:47:17
cannot be applied to a k-means clustering of this issue okay just to use a simple machine learning context
01:47:23
like this is they put a lot of effort into finding click fraud right this is going to be a very similar problem
01:47:30
we don't allow angry young men who've been emailing with the middle east who are citizens of this country who've
01:47:38
been posting online that they want to run a plane into a building to go get their pilot's license
01:47:44
right we profiled them after september 11th and we said no moss and all chamath is saying is use your
01:47:51
[ __ ] common sense identify these folks that we know are struggling to need help and put them on
01:47:57
a list and say they can't buy an assault weapon period yeah all right everybody it's
01:48:02
time to go uh thank you uh to uh brad kirschner for sitting in uh thanks again to the dictator tremofita and
01:48:10
uh thanks saks and thanks to everybody who uh spoke at the all in summit we've been um releasing all of the videos
01:48:16
freyberg will be back next week as well the hammer lucky explosive episode so look for a great week of all in content
01:48:24
next week we'll see you all next time rain man david sacks and it said we open source it to the
01:48:38
fans and they've just gone crazy with it [Music] besties [Music] we need to get back
01:49:18
[Music]

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 85
    Most heartbreaking
  • 80
    Most emotional
  • 80
    Biggest cultural impact
  • 75
    Most shocking

Episode Highlights

  • Palmer Luckey's Controversial Moment
    Palmer Luckey calls out cancel culture during his speech, creating a dramatic atmosphere.
    “He called out cancel culture and then he called out Jacob.”
    @ 06m 26s
    May 27, 2022
  • All In Summit Reflections
    The hosts share their thoughts on the recent All In Summit, highlighting emotional moments and community engagement.
    “I thought it was much more than just a bunch of talking heads on stage.”
    @ 10m 18s
    May 27, 2022
  • Home Sales Miss
    New home sales fell significantly short of expectations, signaling potential market issues.
    “It was a pretty massive miss in terms of home sales.”
    @ 24m 16s
    May 27, 2022
  • Earnings at Risk
    Concerns grow that companies' earnings forecasts may be fundamentally wrong, impacting valuations.
    “The earnings being at risk is this contagion we talked about.”
    @ 33m 24s
    May 27, 2022
  • The Bitter Medicine of Portfolio Management
    Investors must face the harsh reality of marking down portfolios to reflect true valuations.
    “You got to make some changes, I mean look, I love Brad's reaction.”
    @ 39m 08s
    May 27, 2022
  • Wealth Creation Explained
    The discussion highlights the importance of real goods and services in creating wealth, not just money printing.
    “The only thing that creates wealth is the output of goods and services.”
    @ 49m 05s
    May 27, 2022
  • Market Dynamics and Reset
    The venture capital landscape is undergoing a reset, impacting expectations and valuations. 'The cycles that overlay that secular curve are not suspended.'
    “The cycles that overlay that secular curve are not suspended.”
    @ 58m 06s
    May 27, 2022
  • Survival Metrics for Startups
    Founders need to focus on actionable metrics to ensure survival in a challenging environment. 'I call it default investible.'
    “I call it default investible.”
    @ 01h 05m 55s
    May 27, 2022
  • The Profile of Mass Shooters
    Mass shooters often share a disturbing profile: young men from broken families with deep resentments.
    “These are all universally young men, 18, 19 years old, from broken families.”
    @ 01h 17m 11s
    May 27, 2022
  • The Need for Gun Control Solutions
    The discussion emphasizes the need for reasonable gun control measures to prevent future tragedies.
    “There's an obvious middle ground on gun control that we can agree on.”
    @ 01h 20m 39s
    May 27, 2022
  • The Need for Urgent Action
    After September 11th, we changed everything to protect ourselves. Why not now?
    “We need to disrupt our lives to save these innocent kids.”
    @ 01h 34m 12s
    May 27, 2022
  • Mental Health Crisis
    Mental health issues are skyrocketing, especially among the youth.
    “Mental health is becoming the number one cause of death.”
    @ 01h 44m 45s
    May 27, 2022

Episode Quotes

  • I thought the whole thing was a J-Cal grift and it actually turned out well.
    E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde
  • We're headed into a pretty serious downturn or recession here.
    E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde
  • If you don't like it, quit.
    E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde
  • The default action by every founder today should be a 90 degree course correction.
    E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde
  • This is a unique feature of the system we created.
    E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde
  • We need to profile these kids, we should profile them.
    E83: Market slide continues, and how to address Uvalde

Key Moments

  • Emotional Connections03:19
  • Palmer's Speech06:26
  • Fed Dilemma25:21
  • Red Flag Laws1:14:46
  • NRA Influence1:16:13
  • Community Responsibility1:18:36
  • Gun Control Solutions1:20:39
  • Call to Action1:45:21

Tension Over Time

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown