Search Captions & Ask AI

How a $70B Fund Manager Thinks About Investing in IPOs 💵

June 24, 2025 / 01:24

This episode discusses the differences between SPACs, direct listings, and traditional IPOs, focusing on the importance of asset quality, float size, and lockup periods.

The conversation highlights that the quality of the underlying asset is paramount, with emphasis on long-term value rather than the method of going public. The guests discuss how liquidity and float size impact investment decisions.

They mention that a larger float is preferable for achieving a truer price and reducing volatility. The episode references LinkedIn's IPO, noting its small float percentage and resulting volatility.

Key points include the significance of the lockup period in direct listings and how it can affect pricing dynamics.

TLDR

The episode covers SPACs, IPOs, and asset quality in public offerings.

Episode

1:24
00:00:00
do you care about how these companies go public like do you care about spack versus direct listing versus IPO i don't
00:00:06
i only care about the quality of the underlying asset and what I think it can be worth 5 years from now now obviously
00:00:12
I do care about the liquidity that I'm getting in the IPO Chimoth am I getting a million or 100 million or a billion as
00:00:19
the float right that's number one and obviously I also do care about the percentage that is floating and I do
00:00:25
care about the lockup those three elements are really important in terms of a company going public and how we
00:00:29
think about participating give the listeners the guidance there so for the first thing bigger is better than
00:00:34
smaller correct so it's number one can I even buy it if the IPO is so small and we can't get a large enough position it
00:00:41
doesn't really make sense for us so that would be point number one point number two is how much of the company is
00:00:46
publicly floating bigger is better there as well correct you kind of get a truer
00:00:51
price when a higher percentage of the company floats it's also most likely going to be less volatile and less
00:00:57
susceptible to predatory pricing and manipulation and things like that chath you may know this i think LinkedIn went
00:01:03
out at like 10% or something i remember it being really small yeah and a lot of us thinking like wow that is a small
00:01:08
percentage which ended up being very volatile i think 20% is in my opinion kind of a minimum so number two the
00:01:15
float and then number three the lockup first is there one in a direct listing there may not be one you may get in that
00:01:21
scenario to a truer price faster

Episode Highlights

  • The Importance of Float Size
    A larger float percentage leads to a truer price and less volatility.
    “Bigger is better than smaller, correct?”
    @ 00m 32s
    June 24, 2025
  • Lockup Periods Matter
    Understanding lockup periods can affect pricing in direct listings.
    “Is there one in a direct listing?”
    @ 01m 17s
    June 24, 2025

Episode Quotes

  • Bigger is better than smaller, correct?
    How a $70B Fund Manager Thinks About Investing in IPOs 💵
  • 20% is in my opinion kind of a minimum.
    How a $70B Fund Manager Thinks About Investing in IPOs 💵

Key Moments

  • Company Size Matters00:32
  • Float Percentage01:13
  • Lockup Periods01:17