Search Captions & Ask AI

Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?

February 20, 2026 / 01:40:42

This episode of the Waveform Podcast covers the Pixel 10A, a March Apple event, and updates on Ring doorbell features. Hosts Marquez, Andrew, and David discuss the Pixel 10A's similarities to the 9A, the implications of Apple's upcoming event, and the recent backlash against Ring's surveillance features.

The hosts share their thoughts on the Pixel 10A, noting that it has minimal upgrades compared to the 9A, including a slightly brighter display and faster charging. They express disappointment in Google's decision to release a phone that feels like a minor update.

They also discuss the upcoming Apple event, speculating on potential announcements, including new MacBooks and the possibility of a cheaper A-series MacBook. The conversation touches on Apple's strategy in the education market and the competition with Chromebooks.

Additionally, the episode features a segment on Ring's recent decision to abandon a controversial surveillance feature after public backlash. The hosts reflect on the implications of such technology and the company's vision for a future with reduced crime.

Finally, the episode wraps up with trivia and games, keeping the conversation light and engaging while touching on various tech topics.

TL;DR

The hosts discuss the Pixel 10A, upcoming Apple event, and Ring's surveillance feature backlash.

Episode

1:40:42
00:00:00
You're what?
00:00:01
>> Sad at how the A series phone.
00:00:02
>> It's not like you'd ever buy it anyway.
00:00:04
>> I used to have a I used to be an A
00:00:06
series guy, not a main Pixel guy.
00:00:08
>> I think base Pixel's got to make moves
00:00:09
this year.
00:00:10
>> Agreed. Part agreed.
00:00:12
>> In what way?
00:00:13
>> They're just tanking for a rebuild.
00:00:16
>> I saw that.
00:00:16
>> They want to get trapped.
00:00:22
>> Yo, what is up people of the internet?
00:00:24
Welcome back to another episode of the
00:00:25
Waveform Podcast. We're your hosts. I'm
00:00:27
Marquez.
00:00:28
>> I'm Andrew.
00:00:28
>> And I'm David. This week we've got the
00:00:31
Pixel 9A uh 10A, sorry, almost the same
00:00:34
thing. 10A, a random March Apple event
00:00:37
that has been announced. We'll have some
00:00:38
thoughts, a Ring doorbell update. You
00:00:40
might have heard us crash out about that
00:00:41
last week. And also video on Apple
00:00:43
Podcasts, and we're going to wrap it up
00:00:45
with a game from Adam.
00:00:47
Also, make sure you subscribe. Just just
00:00:50
just before we get into it at all, uh we
00:00:53
saw a comment on the last episode that
00:00:55
said you could still hype us. That was
00:00:57
They've been saying it since we hit
00:00:59
500,000. So, for a couple episodes,
00:01:01
>> we're either wrong about the
00:01:02
requirements for being hyped or you guys
00:01:05
are like breaking YouTube.
00:01:07
>> YouTube has already forgotten about
00:01:09
hyping.
00:01:09
>> Yeah. Let's Let's make sure we're far
00:01:11
enough clear past 500K that we're
00:01:13
definitely past 500K. So, make sure you
00:01:15
subscribe if you haven't already. And if
00:01:16
if you do see a hype button, let me
00:01:17
know. Like, tweet it at us.
00:01:19
>> Press it first.
00:01:20
>> Yeah. Press press it and then screen
00:01:21
record it and then send it to us.
00:01:23
>> Click it. I want to start off this
00:01:26
episode with I' I've been thinking of
00:01:27
like a segment we can do to start
00:01:29
>> an apology to Xfinity.
00:01:31
>> That is never happening. I do have I'll
00:01:33
have a very brief update on that later,
00:01:35
but um
00:01:36
>> I was thinking of an idea and I sent
00:01:38
this all to you guys so you can all
00:01:39
brainstorm it for future episodes, but
00:01:41
like a really fast five minute segment
00:01:43
to start every episode off with. Um so
00:01:46
my conclusion was a little segment we're
00:01:49
going to try called Did they even test
00:01:51
this? because people really liked our
00:01:53
crash outs last week and kind of they
00:01:55
love when we complain about super random
00:01:58
things that we don't are so minuscule
00:02:01
but that frustrate us and there's so
00:02:02
many
00:02:03
>> that's like my entire personality.
00:02:04
>> It is I this stem from me wanting to do
00:02:07
a seg an episode where all of us record
00:02:10
every time a piece of tech does
00:02:12
something we don't want it to do during
00:02:13
the day.
00:02:14
>> And I think it's way more than you would
00:02:15
think. Um but this can be we can slowly
00:02:18
write them all down. But anyways, this
00:02:19
is just going to be a very
00:02:22
obvious thing that is wrong in a piece
00:02:24
of tech that you have and every week
00:02:25
we'll do one, whoever wants to do it.
00:02:27
I'm going to start mine with
00:02:29
>> I need my phone here.
00:02:31
>> Um, in Slack,
00:02:33
>> you know, Slack has plenty of issues by
00:02:36
itself.
00:02:38
>> Slackessions.
00:02:39
>> Yeah. So, if you go into Slack and go to
00:02:42
write a message and use the emote button
00:02:45
either to react or to just put an emote,
00:02:47
>> there's an emoj button.
00:02:48
>> Emo
00:02:49
>> emoji button.
00:02:50
>> Emoji.
00:02:51
>> You'll see this list of icons that are
00:02:53
the categories for what all of the
00:02:55
different because we're at hundreds and
00:02:56
hundreds of emojis now, right? One of
00:02:58
these icons is a heart.
00:03:00
>> Mhm.
00:03:00
>> What do you think would be under the
00:03:02
heart icon category?
00:03:03
>> Different types of hearts,
00:03:04
>> body parts.
00:03:06
>> It is actually the symbols category.
00:03:08
>> Oh, what? There's not a single heart.
00:03:11
>> What
00:03:11
>> in the symbols category, which is
00:03:14
>> why does heart denote a symbol?
00:03:16
>> Well, it is a symbol, but not that kind
00:03:19
of symbol.
00:03:20
>> Yeah, it's when the heart is one of the
00:03:22
most used reaction slash like emotes
00:03:26
probably most people use.
00:03:28
>> Yeah.
00:03:28
>> Uh you think they'd have that right, but
00:03:30
I've been tricked by this so many times
00:03:32
where I go to like heart one of
00:03:34
someone's posts in Slack and I get this.
00:03:37
Uh, one thing we found that's kind of
00:03:38
weird about it is I believe on like on
00:03:41
desktop in my Slack, it's actually a
00:03:44
piece symbol instead.
00:03:46
>> Uh,
00:03:46
>> which makes more sense.
00:03:47
>> That does make more sense.
00:03:48
>> So, this may possibly be just a weird
00:03:52
mobile thing they didn't fix.
00:03:54
>> Yeah, I'm checking on my
00:03:55
>> is that on my phone as well? Yeah.
00:03:56
>> And then I go to press heart and I get
00:03:58
ATM biohazard sign uh yin-yang arrows
00:04:05
used. Hopefully, it's in your frequently
00:04:07
used.
00:04:07
>> Uh, it's not always, but anyways.
00:04:10
>> Wow.
00:04:10
>> I use our HDR emote way too much emoji.
00:04:13
Um, but yeah, so that is my um I want to
00:04:16
keep it brief. That is my Did they even
00:04:17
test this?
00:04:18
>> The heart category with no hearts in it.
00:04:20
>> Yeah, we should. Slack, if you're
00:04:21
listening to this, maybe update that. I
00:04:23
have a feeling there's a lot of things
00:04:24
that we're going to find that the
00:04:26
companies
00:04:27
>> Yes.
00:04:27
>> kind of just forgot about
00:04:29
>> and then we reservice it and they go,
00:04:31
"Oh, yeah." And then they can just they
00:04:32
can just fix it.
00:04:34
>> Yeah. But Salesforce owns Slack and I
00:04:36
imagine all they think about is KPIs and
00:04:38
not hearts.
00:04:39
>> Yeah. And making a Mr. Beast commercial.
00:04:40
>> Yeah. But there's got to be someone from
00:04:42
Slack who watches this podcast.
00:04:45
>> Like one person
00:04:46
>> probably.
00:04:47
>> There's got to be one person.
00:04:48
>> Yeah.
00:04:48
>> And they can they can fire off an email.
00:04:51
They I'm sure they have an internal
00:04:52
Slack at Slack, right? They can send a
00:04:54
send a quick Slack message.
00:04:55
>> They actually use Teams.
00:04:56
>> Teams. Oh no. Well, they can find a way
00:04:59
to to to hopefully maybe update that.
00:05:01
We'll see if we can get it done.
00:05:02
>> Okay. That'd be good. Next week we'll
00:05:04
find another thing.
00:05:05
>> My did testice is um is metal watch
00:05:08
bands. Does anyone They always pull your
00:05:11
hair.
00:05:11
>> This feels like a Seinfeld joke. What's
00:05:13
the deal with metal watch bands?
00:05:15
>> I mean, they've been, you know, classic
00:05:17
for many years, but they always just
00:05:19
pull your arm hairs. Maybe I'm just too
00:05:21
hairy. I don't know. Same same here.
00:05:23
>> It wants you to remember you've got a
00:05:25
sick watch on all the time.
00:05:26
>> That's true. Yeah, that's true.
00:05:28
>> Yeah.
00:05:29
>> We We solved that one.
00:05:30
>> We solved the
00:05:31
>> Yeah. everyone uh put it in your notes
00:05:34
app.
00:05:34
>> Let's try and do one every week. I think
00:05:36
it'll be fun and it's our due diligence.
00:05:40
Let me know.
00:05:41
>> Um I'll also very quickly do a quick
00:05:43
internet update. I did have my internet
00:05:45
back by the time I got home on
00:05:46
Wednesday.
00:05:47
>> Don't clap. Please do not clap. They do
00:05:50
not deserve a clap.
00:05:50
>> Comcast.
00:05:51
>> One funny thing that happened was I get
00:05:54
a call on Friday and it's a person
00:05:57
saying, "Hey, this is blah blah blah
00:05:58
with Xfinity. Did you know no one's home
00:06:00
right now?" And I said, "What?
00:06:01
>> I did know no one's home right now. Why
00:06:04
are you at my house?"
00:06:05
>> My home.
00:06:05
>> And he's like, "Oh, there were some
00:06:06
other wires hanging low and I got a a
00:06:09
thing to come and fix them." I was like,
00:06:12
"Okay, no one told me that." And he
00:06:14
said, "Well, they're technically
00:06:14
telephone wires." And then that guy,
00:06:17
super nice, the actual technician, he
00:06:19
was like, "They're not even our wires,
00:06:20
but I think I have something that can
00:06:21
probably move them up a little bit so
00:06:23
nothing actually accidentally touches
00:06:24
it." Mhm.
00:06:25
>> He winds up doing the whole thing and
00:06:26
giving me his personal cell phone number
00:06:28
because he says, "Don't even try calling
00:06:29
the 1-800 number. It accomplishes
00:06:31
nothing."
00:06:32
>> That is uh so shout out to that guy.
00:06:34
>> Exactly. The the technicians who come
00:06:36
are basically always actually
00:06:38
knowledgeable and helpful.
00:06:39
>> Yeah. They're poorly managed.
00:06:41
>> I just can't you can't get in touch with
00:06:42
them.
00:06:43
>> Yeah. So
00:06:44
>> I do feel like I had a very similar
00:06:45
experience for some reason like getting
00:06:48
fiber installed. I don't remember what
00:06:49
exactly happened, but I remember the
00:06:51
actual in-person technical person being
00:06:54
way more helpful than anyone at the
00:06:55
company trying to get them there.
00:06:57
>> One more funny story about this really
00:06:59
fast is um I got an email
00:07:02
>> last week, let me find it real fast,
00:07:05
from Comcast business point of contact
00:07:08
who tried to contact us to see if we
00:07:10
needed any business needs from Comcast,
00:07:13
which was possibly the worst timing ever
00:07:15
after everything happened last week. So,
00:07:17
my little piece of uh
00:07:21
help or revenge, I guess, is I just got
00:07:24
to send him a nice email that said,
00:07:25
"There's zero chance after the horrible
00:07:28
experience I had last week." And that
00:07:30
we're not interested at working with
00:07:31
Xfinity at all. That was my little soul
00:07:34
solace of that whole experience.
00:07:36
>> Hopefully, some human read that instead
00:07:37
of just AI filtering it over.
00:07:38
>> Well, he even says in his email, "Save
00:07:41
my contact information. No need to wait
00:07:43
on our 1-800 lines for an available
00:07:45
remote agent call center. Do
00:07:48
>> you think this was in response to your
00:07:50
rant?
00:07:50
>> No, because it's just a salesperson
00:07:52
probably spamming people.
00:07:53
>> So, you think it was just like
00:07:54
coincidence that they did this?
00:07:56
>> Just a really unfortunate coincidence.
00:07:58
>> Damn. Well,
00:08:00
internet is a monopoly.
00:08:04
>> Other things that are not monopolies,
00:08:06
but could be surveillance states. Uh, we
00:08:09
have a little update to our Ring story
00:08:11
from last week. So, if you didn't listen
00:08:12
to last week's episode, effectively one
00:08:14
of the Super Bowl commercials that came
00:08:15
out was that Ring, the doorbell company
00:08:17
owned by Amazon, had this new feature
00:08:20
that they were going to turn on um where
00:08:22
basically all the rings would act as
00:08:25
surveillance state cameras and if you
00:08:28
lost your dog, it would identify your
00:08:30
dog and totally not people and
00:08:32
>> only your dog.
00:08:33
>> We record this episode, we record this
00:08:35
uh podcast on Wednesdays. On Thursday,
00:08:38
uh Ring came out and basically was like,
00:08:40
"Never mind. we're not. So, they spent
00:08:42
all that money on the Super Bowl ad and
00:08:44
then they were like, actually, we're not
00:08:46
going to be working with Flock to do
00:08:48
this anymore. They cited a bunch of
00:08:51
reasons that uh probably were not the
00:08:53
reasons. And really, the real reason was
00:08:55
just that everyone was like canceling
00:08:57
and unsubscribing and getting rid of
00:08:59
Ring and etc., etc., etc. Um, but what's
00:09:02
kind of ironic about this is like the
00:09:04
the CEO of Ring, the founder of Ring,
00:09:07
uh, they
00:09:08
>> Mr. Ring,
00:09:09
>> Mr. Ring himself, he has been very
00:09:12
outspoken in this fact that like he
00:09:14
actually wants there to be a
00:09:16
surveillance state specifically because
00:09:18
he is like laser focused on getting
00:09:20
crime down to zero. And he's like,
00:09:22
"Yeah, I mean I I eventually want all of
00:09:25
these cameras to just continuously be
00:09:28
recording everybody everywhere and going
00:09:30
to police and we want to work with
00:09:31
police,
00:09:31
>> everyone everywhere all at once."
00:09:34
>> There are there are two schools of
00:09:35
thought here.
00:09:35
>> That's why he started the company. It is
00:09:37
not untrue that crime goes down when
00:09:40
people think that they are going to get
00:09:41
caught obviously right so that that is
00:09:43
these two schools of thought that people
00:09:45
have and he's been very outspoken on the
00:09:47
fact that he thinks that this is the way
00:09:49
forward um there's actually a good
00:09:51
decoder episode with Nei about this that
00:09:53
uh he went on and did with him and he's
00:09:55
pretty straightforward on what he wants
00:09:57
to do with this but obviously all of
00:09:59
that backlash uh made it so that they
00:10:01
are deciding that they are not going to
00:10:03
do this anymore so
00:10:04
>> I think they said like it was taking
00:10:06
longer than they expected and definitely
00:10:08
had nothing to do with
00:10:10
>> the immense backlash that came after
00:10:12
them spending probably almost $10
00:10:14
million on a commercial.
00:10:15
>> I'm just looking back. I mean 10 million
00:10:17
is almost nothing to them. But it is
00:10:18
funny that like they called it search
00:10:20
party.
00:10:20
>> Yeah.
00:10:21
>> There's just I'm looking back like how
00:10:23
did this make it all the way to the end?
00:10:24
you know,
00:10:25
>> well, I have somebody had the idea and
00:10:27
was like, "Here's a great idea." And
00:10:29
everyone in in marketing was like,
00:10:30
"Yeah, yeah." And then not one single
00:10:32
person went,
00:10:33
>> "Hey, you know what this looks like?"
00:10:35
And and it just went all the way to the
00:10:36
end.
00:10:37
>> I I was at a bakery this weekend and
00:10:40
someone in our town lost their dog. And
00:10:42
I saw a couple go look at the thing and
00:10:44
say, "Oh, did you see that commercial in
00:10:45
the Super Bowl? Like it can find lost
00:10:47
dogs? That's pretty cool." And I was
00:10:49
like,
00:10:52
>> that's how they were hoping it would go.
00:10:53
Yeah, that's exactly what they were
00:10:54
picturing.
00:10:55
>> So, there are people who do think that.
00:10:56
It's just also really funny when you
00:10:58
think about the numbers they put in the
00:10:59
commercial of being like
00:11:01
>> a million people lose their pets and we
00:11:04
find one per
00:11:05
>> we find like 0.01% of dogs that get
00:11:08
lost.
00:11:09
>> Yeah.
00:11:09
>> And also everything compassionate
00:11:12
>> uh valid use case for something that
00:11:14
could obviously be used for way worse
00:11:16
things.
00:11:17
>> And they're like, "Oh, it doesn't even
00:11:18
have access. It doesn't even have the
00:11:19
ability to recognize faces. That's our
00:11:21
separate feature called familiar faces.
00:11:23
But they don't touch each other at all.
00:11:24
Like, okay,
00:11:26
>> but we can recognize dogs like really
00:11:27
well.
00:11:28
>> But only dogs.
00:11:29
>> We trained our model on a thousand dogs.
00:11:31
We know
00:11:32
>> they need to hire the uh marketing
00:11:35
people at Apple who just make you
00:11:36
terrified of not purchasing their
00:11:37
products. That would work a little bit.
00:11:39
>> Yeah, that like
00:11:42
Yeah, the bear in the house video. Yeah.
00:11:44
>> Yeah. Um Okay. Well, another thing that
00:11:49
happened where we thought it would be
00:11:50
better, but it actually got worse is
00:11:52
that the Google has announced that the
00:11:55
Pixel 9 series is now going to have the
00:11:57
ability to use AirDrop as well. So, if
00:12:00
you remember a few weeks ago, Google
00:12:01
added compatibility for the Pixel 10
00:12:03
series to have AirDrop. They said, "We
00:12:05
are excited to bring this to more
00:12:06
Android phones soon." We were hoping
00:12:08
that more Android phones would be more
00:12:10
Android phones, not more Google phones.
00:12:13
Um, and so they're being added to it's
00:12:15
being added to all Pixel 9 devices
00:12:18
except for the 9A.
00:12:20
>> And uh, when reached for comment about
00:12:23
this, Google just kind of gave their PR
00:12:25
answer of we're excited to bring this to
00:12:27
more Android phones in the future. I was
00:12:29
really hoping they were just going to be
00:12:31
using the Pixel 10 series as a test bed
00:12:33
to make sure it worked on Android at all
00:12:35
and had enough stability, etc., etc. But
00:12:38
now they're just putting pushing it to
00:12:39
the 9. They still haven't done the
00:12:41
eight. There's all these other phones. I
00:12:42
don't really know what needs to be done
00:12:43
here. But
00:12:44
>> can I do you think they didn't do 9A
00:12:47
because when 10A drops 10A will have it
00:12:50
and they need to wait a couple months
00:12:52
for 9A to get it. So then 9A doesn't
00:12:54
have it cuz nothing We'll talk about it
00:12:56
in a minute, but not much has changed in
00:12:58
the 10A.
00:12:58
>> That is a Google thing to do. But doing
00:13:01
that off the back of finally having an
00:13:04
Apple feature is just very strange. They
00:13:07
usually do that in Google Photos. They
00:13:08
don't usually do that. Yeah, that's
00:13:10
common with other features.
00:13:11
>> I'm a Blip stand. Sorry. Before we get
00:13:13
off airdrop blip rules.
00:13:15
>> Blip kind of hit the studio this year
00:13:17
hard and like we've been an AirDrop
00:13:20
Studio as you probably have been
00:13:22
familiar. Like a lot of us are using
00:13:24
Final Cut Pro and and Max in the studio.
00:13:26
So, we like pass files back and forth
00:13:28
and it's decently useful for I'd say
00:13:31
anything up to about one gig. But as
00:13:34
soon as I see like 890 megabytes and I
00:13:36
need to send somebody a file, I'm like,
00:13:37
do I really want to airdrop this? like
00:13:39
it's going to not work some of the
00:13:40
times. DUI also speaking of did you test
00:13:43
this? Every time I go to open to share
00:13:44
an airdrop, it starts populating and it
00:13:46
goes 3 6 12 15 a ton of devices and I go
00:13:50
to click the one to airdrop to and then
00:13:51
it slides over and it slides again to
00:13:53
the next row. Every single time I miss
00:13:55
and I send it to the wrong person and
00:13:57
it's really annoying. So, please test
00:13:58
that Apple. Anyway, uh Airdrop usually
00:14:01
doesn't work after a large enough file
00:14:03
size or it's extremely slow. And Rufus,
00:14:05
I think, is the one who brought Blip to
00:14:06
the studio. He's like, "Have you guys
00:14:07
tried Blip?" And we're like, "What's
00:14:08
that?" And he's like, "Yeah, it's just
00:14:09
an app that does the same exact thing,
00:14:11
but it actually works
00:14:12
>> and crossplatform
00:14:13
>> and it's crossplatform and it's local.
00:14:15
It's faster."
00:14:15
>> We got to give Rub a little more credit
00:14:16
cuz it was the kind of thing where he
00:14:18
was like, "Let me blip this to you." We
00:14:19
were like, "Dude, you want me to
00:14:20
download a thing just so you No, I'm not
00:14:23
getting another."
00:14:23
>> Yeah. It's like AirDrop's right here,
00:14:24
bro. It's right here. It works.
00:14:25
>> And then everyone sends their first blip
00:14:27
and it's like,
00:14:27
>> "Whoa, what?"
00:14:30
>> Do you know what? For the super niche
00:14:32
content tech content creators out there
00:14:34
who might be reviewing Android phones
00:14:36
and editing on a Mac, being able to send
00:14:39
the files through Blip instead is
00:14:41
>> life-changing.
00:14:42
>> It's huge. I'm going to send my four
00:14:44
people.
00:14:45
>> Yeah, all four of us who are reviewing
00:14:46
Android phones,
00:14:47
>> bro. Yeah, it's really good.
00:14:49
>> Anyway, Google uh decided to drop the
00:14:51
Pixel 10a this week. They were teasing
00:14:53
it for a little bit. They were sort of
00:14:55
teasing it because it looks the same, so
00:14:58
they just showed us what it looked like
00:14:59
already. Now, we have all the official
00:15:00
specs and all the official numbers and
00:15:02
everything, and it's
00:15:06
it's the same as the Pixel 9a,
00:15:10
almost literally the same. So, I went
00:15:12
into this thinking it's the same phone.
00:15:13
I I have the spec sheet in front of me
00:15:15
here. Display, same size, same
00:15:17
resolution. I'm going back and forth.
00:15:19
Okay. Display, batteries, same size.
00:15:21
Okay. Okay. Cameras, same exact cameras.
00:15:23
All right. Uh chip, same exact Pixel,
00:15:27
the Tensor 4 chip. So, I'm like, what do
00:15:29
they actually change in the Pixel 10A?
00:15:31
It's the same price. Uh, in case you're
00:15:34
curious, I have a full list here of
00:15:36
everything that's different about Pixel
00:15:38
10 A
00:15:39
>> versus Pixel 9a. Ready?
00:15:41
>> I'm ready.
00:15:42
>> The camera bump, which was pretty flush
00:15:45
before.
00:15:46
>> It was like very flush.
00:15:47
>> It was actually It's like a millimeter
00:15:50
protruding. Now, it's actually zero
00:15:52
flush.
00:15:53
>> So, it took an angle grinder to it.
00:15:54
>> Yeah.
00:15:55
Um, the uniform bezels, I can't tell
00:15:59
with my eyes, but I'm told they're
00:16:01
slightly thinner.
00:16:02
>> 10% as they say. It doesn't look it.
00:16:05
>> Uh, wired charging goes from 23 watts to
00:16:07
30. Wireless charging goes from 7 and a
00:16:09
half 7 and 12 watts to 10.
00:16:10
>> Okay.
00:16:11
>> And the display is 10% brighter.
00:16:13
>> Did they tell you the wired charging
00:16:14
thing?
00:16:15
>> Their spec sheet they sent
00:16:16
>> is so vague and annoying.
00:16:18
>> 10% brighter.
00:16:19
>> Yeah. On the spec sheet they sent us, it
00:16:21
just says uh
00:16:23
>> it's like imperceivable brightness
00:16:25
change.
00:16:25
>> It was like 2700 peak brightness to
00:16:28
3,000.
00:16:28
>> Yeah, but brightness is logarithmic
00:16:30
already. So like
00:16:31
>> yeah, it's not going to blow your mind,
00:16:32
but
00:16:33
it's uh it's a little brighter. And
00:16:36
yeah, otherwise it's the same phone,
00:16:38
same Tensor G4, same 8 gigs of RAM.
00:16:40
>> Does it have
00:16:41
>> Nope.
00:16:43
>> Probably not.
00:16:44
>> Nope. Ah,
00:16:45
>> my one, this is the thing about
00:16:48
releasing a new phone that's basically
00:16:50
the same as last year. A lot of people
00:16:52
sometimes like to complain like, oh, you
00:16:53
didn't change anything. But I think
00:16:55
without any substance for what they
00:16:57
should have changed, that's kind of an
00:16:58
empty complaint because change for the
00:17:00
sake of change isn't doesn't really help
00:17:01
anyone. Like you want to keep it
00:17:02
consistent. You've got a brand, you
00:17:04
know, you have to keep something
00:17:05
consistent.
00:17:06
So, what should they have changed is the
00:17:08
real question. And the number one thing
00:17:11
that comes to mind is you did this whole
00:17:13
pixel snap thing with the Pixel 10s. The
00:17:15
G2 magnets in the back. This would have
00:17:17
been perfect. You could have just one
00:17:18
up. You could have made an ad about how
00:17:19
the base iPhone 17 or 16e or whatever
00:17:22
doesn't have it. This would have been
00:17:24
fun. You could have had it across the
00:17:25
whole Pixel 10.
00:17:26
>> And they didn't add magnets.
00:17:27
>> That's crazy.
00:17:28
>> They didn't uh move to the Tensor G5.
00:17:31
They didn't add uh they didn't go 256
00:17:34
gigs of base storage. They didn't do any
00:17:35
of the things they could have done that
00:17:37
I think would have been nice at this
00:17:39
$4.99 price.
00:17:40
>> Taking notes from Samsung.
00:17:42
>> Yeah. So, at first I was like, why even
00:17:45
release a new phone at all because it's,
00:17:48
you know, you don't have to every year.
00:17:50
But then I was like, you know what?
00:17:52
You're Google. You kind of just do. You
00:17:53
just you just go through the motions.
00:17:55
And I felt that vibe the entire time I
00:17:56
was like shooting the phone. We went to
00:17:57
the city and like had a little briefing
00:18:00
and they brought us to this back room. I
00:18:01
always feel like they usually like shut
00:18:03
down that area of the building to keep
00:18:05
it quiet so that we can shoot. There was
00:18:07
just Google employees walking by. Oh,
00:18:09
they're doing the thing. Like nobody
00:18:10
seemed to care. We shot the phone.
00:18:13
>> Uh it it was very much an afterthought
00:18:15
type of phone. So it's updated.
00:18:17
>> I wanted you so bad to bring a 9A and
00:18:20
just leave it on one of the platforms
00:18:22
and then see if anyone accidentally
00:18:24
recorded the wrong phone and made it
00:18:25
into a different review. It's perfect
00:18:27
because the colors of the phones,
00:18:29
there's four colors, are almost exactly
00:18:31
the same, just a little bit more
00:18:34
saturated. And I saw the spec sheet had
00:18:36
different color names and I was like,
00:18:37
"Oh, maybe there's different colors cuz
00:18:38
there's like
00:18:40
>> fog and obsidian. And then there's like
00:18:42
a sort of a reddish and a purplish one.
00:18:44
I forgot the names.
00:18:45
>> Lavender and berry, right?"
00:18:47
>> Uh, I think that's the new ones. Yeah.
00:18:49
Had some name like peony and porcelain
00:18:52
or something else. And so they like
00:18:53
renamed the white one porcelain to fog,
00:18:56
but it's still the same color.
00:18:59
>> And then they have this.
00:19:01
>> If you're going to change everything by
00:19:02
like such an imperceivable amount, why
00:19:04
even change it?
00:19:06
>> Exactly.
00:19:06
>> Like you could you should just call it
00:19:08
the Pixel A 2026. Pixel A 2027. At this
00:19:13
point,
00:19:13
>> at least the companies used to be a
00:19:15
little bit more honest about it. They'd
00:19:16
go, "Oh, this is the iPhone 6S." Cuz
00:19:18
it's it's a small update from the iPhone
00:19:21
6. In fact, it's the same design, just a
00:19:23
little bit of a spec bump, like a a
00:19:24
couple small things.
00:19:25
>> This isn't even a spec bump.
00:19:27
>> Yeah. And at least with that, you'd be
00:19:28
like, "All right, I'll probably skip the
00:19:29
S and just wait for the next one. This
00:19:31
one, they it's just a 10A and it's it's
00:19:34
just the same as the last phone." And I
00:19:37
ended up thinking about that for the
00:19:38
video. And the conclusion I came to is
00:19:40
like the Pixel is very much a
00:19:43
softwaredefined thing.
00:19:44
>> Yeah. Like the reason you get a Pixel,
00:19:46
especially the A series Pixel, like that
00:19:48
buyer isn't going, I want the latest
00:19:49
chip or I want the, you know, the
00:19:52
highest resolution display or whatever,
00:19:54
it's just it's just a phone that works
00:19:56
that has the Pixel features and it's
00:19:59
still that. And so that's the reason why
00:20:01
it's probably fine for most of those
00:20:03
people. But yeah, as someone who reviews
00:20:05
phones year-over-year, this was like,
00:20:08
huh, I don't think I've ever seen that
00:20:09
before. We've talked about them having a
00:20:11
lot of sort of like uh friendliness with
00:20:14
Samsung. It seems like they're taking a
00:20:16
lot of lessons from Samsung over here.
00:20:17
>> Yeah. This is like we've been joking
00:20:19
about how we've on we're on the what S23
00:20:22
>> S23 plus+. Um, but this is like another
00:20:26
level of a whole lot of nothing, which
00:20:28
we might see get beat in a week or in a
00:20:31
couple weeks with,
00:20:33
>> we'll talk about it later, but if iPhone
00:20:35
17e is the exact same thing, it's going
00:20:38
to be even funnier this year.
00:20:40
>> Even
00:20:40
>> when the uh the base iPhone got so good
00:20:43
last year.
00:20:44
>> Yeah, there might be a lot of L's.
00:20:45
>> I'm just more with Marquez here. Why
00:20:47
even release this 10A? I think they
00:20:49
could have just been like, you know, the
00:20:51
9a is still pretty good for people that
00:20:53
like want a cheap entry-level Pixel.
00:20:55
>> Yeah.
00:20:56
>> And everyone would would have been like,
00:20:57
"Okay, yeah, yeah, good point."
00:20:58
>> And the iPhone SE used to just be every
00:21:00
couple years and that was fine. We get
00:21:02
an iPhone SE like every 3 years and it
00:21:04
would be like budget phone.
00:21:05
>> Apple knew how to do it. They just
00:21:06
called it SE so that there wasn't the
00:21:08
confusion of like every year. Yeah.
00:21:10
Because now they kind of had to release
00:21:11
the 10A because they had to have a 10
00:21:14
version of the A phone. But if they just
00:21:16
call it like the Pixel E,
00:21:17
>> I think that's literally exactly what
00:21:20
they're doing is somebody is going to
00:21:22
some new shopper is going to start
00:21:24
looking for a budget phone and they will
00:21:25
see that there is a 9A and no 10A and
00:21:27
they'll go oh I guess there is no 10A
00:21:29
and they'll go oh it's old news and move
00:21:32
on. But if there's a 10A they'll
00:21:34
consider it.
00:21:34
>> I mean Apple learned that also they
00:21:36
stopped doing SE and now they did 16E
00:21:39
and possibly 17E right that seems worse.
00:21:42
Seems like they wor still call it SE
00:21:45
because then they can sell the same
00:21:46
phone for a long time.
00:21:47
>> They can, but I think people want to see
00:21:50
>> this number, new number. I want new
00:21:53
number even if it's cheaper.
00:21:54
>> Yeah.
00:21:55
>> Which is unfortunate.
00:21:57
Probably the marketing is the numbers
00:21:59
are probably proving it.
00:22:01
>> Bring back the Pixel 4a. Better phone
00:22:03
than this. Better phone than this. Had a
00:22:05
headphone jack. Cheaper.
00:22:06
>> Wait, can I just confirm really fast the
00:22:09
you so you said they told you 30 watt
00:22:11
wireless charging? is all they say in
00:22:12
here is fast charging up to 50% in 30
00:22:15
minutes using 45 watt USBC charger or
00:22:19
higher sold separately.
00:22:20
>> Yeah, they will sell you separately a 45
00:22:22
watt charger and if you use that one
00:22:23
then it can peak at 30 watts instead of
00:22:25
23 like last year.
00:22:27
>> This is
00:22:29
putting this in the the briefing
00:22:31
document that they send you for as a
00:22:33
reviewer's guide is
00:22:33
>> and isn't that 45 watt charger like
00:22:35
pretty expensive too?
00:22:37
>> It's a thing that I'm sure a lot of
00:22:38
Pixel A buyers won't buy. Yeah,
00:22:40
>> they'll just use whatever one they have.
00:22:41
>> Yeah,
00:22:41
>> I would not be surprised if a bunch of
00:22:44
>> day of reviews today get this part wrong
00:22:47
because of how poorly this is worded in
00:22:49
the reviewers guide.
00:22:50
>> Yeah, it's a lot of deciphering.
00:22:52
>> I mean, at a certain point, these just
00:22:54
become Gemini boxes. That's what Google
00:22:56
wants. That's their endgame. They just
00:22:57
want them to be magical Gemini boxes
00:23:00
that do the thing.
00:23:01
>> They're not going to do this with the
00:23:02
11, are they?
00:23:03
>> Uh, make it look the same. You mean
00:23:05
>> they can't have it be the same spec
00:23:06
sheet as the 10, right? They're just
00:23:08
going to add new tensor accelerators and
00:23:10
that's it.
00:23:11
>> Yeah, that's actually kind of
00:23:14
>> God, that's already doing. Yeah, it's
00:23:16
like that's all that matters now.
00:23:17
>> The the raw horsepower, GPU power, all
00:23:19
that of Tensor has never been the reason
00:23:21
you buy it.
00:23:22
>> Yeah.
00:23:22
>> And so it's just going to be more tensor
00:23:24
cores and more AI chops and kind of the
00:23:27
same specs anyway.
00:23:28
>> With the acceleration of AI that we've
00:23:29
seen in the last year, I imagine that IO
00:23:32
is going to be pretty crazy this year.
00:23:34
Yep. uh which we did get a a date for
00:23:36
officially as of yesterday
00:23:38
>> summer.
00:23:38
>> Jumping ahead a little bit, but that is
00:23:40
happening in May. It's May 19th and
00:23:42
20th.
00:23:43
>> Um so we'll see if that stacks up. But I
00:23:45
imagine there is so much competition in
00:23:47
the AI race. It's not even about the
00:23:49
phones anymore. It's just about Gemini
00:23:51
and what they can do with Gemini. So
00:23:53
yeah, they already have the Pixel
00:23:54
experience pretty laid out.
00:23:55
>> That's what makes a Pixel a Pixel, I
00:23:57
guess.
00:23:57
>> That's what makes it.
00:23:58
>> Yeah. And 128 gig base storage.
00:24:00
>> Yeah. still. So,
00:24:03
I don't know how we even talked about
00:24:04
that for that long, but
00:24:07
honestly,
00:24:07
>> we had we had our segways going really
00:24:09
nicely. We just kind of moved through a
00:24:11
bunch of topics effortlessly because
00:24:12
we're so good at that.
00:24:13
>> Speaking of a lot of topics that you may
00:24:16
or may not get correctly or incorrectly,
00:24:19
>> I see what you did there.
00:24:20
>> Maybe trivia time.
00:24:27
By the way, audience, I promise it will
00:24:29
get more interesting. We have more
00:24:31
stuff. We have
00:24:32
>> I promise nothing of the sort.
00:24:33
>> I thought that was super interesting.
00:24:35
>> We have a lot more interesting. That's
00:24:36
interesting.
00:24:37
>> Actually, if you don't know what if you
00:24:39
didn't look at our thumbnail for the
00:24:41
main channel and also look at the Pixel
00:24:42
9a thumbnail.
00:24:44
>> You should go look because I think it's
00:24:46
one of the
00:24:46
>> it was the most interesting thing about
00:24:48
our video.
00:24:49
>> And it's not a photoshop, by the way.
00:24:51
Some people are thinking we photoshopped
00:24:52
the Pixel 9a thumbnail to change the
00:24:55
color of the phone. No, we reshot.
00:24:58
I wore the same jacket.
00:25:00
>> We actually got a new shot.
00:25:02
>> That was more effort than Google put
00:25:03
into the
00:25:05
>> Tim did change your shirt color cuz you
00:25:07
wore the exact same one but the phone
00:25:10
colors were different. So Tim swapped
00:25:11
your shirt.
00:25:12
>> All right, Adam, hit him hit us with
00:25:13
some easier trivia questions cuz I don't
00:25:15
think any of us have gotten a point in
00:25:16
like
00:25:17
>> Okay, here's the easiest month trivia
00:25:19
question.
00:25:20
>> Okay,
00:25:20
>> let's go.
00:25:21
>> What is Marquez's social security
00:25:22
number?
00:25:22
>> I know it.
00:25:23
>> 606. I knew it. No. So, we spoke about
00:25:26
the 10A just now, but the first Pixel A
00:25:30
phone was the 3A.
00:25:31
>> Mhm.
00:25:32
>> Made by which giant manufacturer?
00:25:35
>> I know this.
00:25:35
>> Oh, yeah.
00:25:36
>> Who made it?
00:25:36
>> Yeah. Back when they were like
00:25:38
>> 50% chance
00:25:39
>> rotating through a couple manufacturers
00:25:41
to make pixels.
00:25:42
>> Yep.
00:25:43
>> Well, and Nexuses. The Nexuses mostly.
00:25:46
Nexy. All the pixels are kind of made by
00:25:49
the same team.
00:25:50
>> Yeah.
00:25:50
>> No, the first couple pixels were the 4A
00:25:52
was big. Wasn't it? They were all made
00:25:55
by the same team. It was just they use
00:25:57
like different screens.
00:25:58
>> Team Pixel.
00:25:59
>> The Pixel 2.
00:26:01
>> Yeah, they were made by Team Pixel.
00:26:03
>> Um, which was the one where the Pixel 2
00:26:05
had the screen issue because it was like
00:26:06
some had the screens from Samsung and
00:26:08
some had them from LG,
00:26:10
>> right?
00:26:10
>> What was the one where like didn't HTC
00:26:12
make the small version and LG made the
00:26:14
XL?
00:26:16
>> That was the Nexus.
00:26:19
I mean, the five was made by the 5X was
00:26:22
made by LG and the 6P was made by
00:26:24
Huawei. Yeah.
00:26:26
>> Yeah. Anyway, I miss those days. We're
00:26:28
talking about how you don't need to
00:26:30
update things because, you know, it's
00:26:31
the same. I missed the Nexus days, but
00:26:33
we had no freaking
00:26:34
>> completely different.
00:26:36
>> What's it going to be? I don't know.
00:26:38
It's going to be a totally random weird.
00:26:40
>> We tried We tried a Shamu, then we tried
00:26:42
a visor, then we went back to Shamu,
00:26:44
>> then we did this. Oh, and then you like
00:26:46
the five. We're going to make it again,
00:26:47
but instead of that, we're also going to
00:26:48
have the 6P.
00:26:49
>> What do you guys think of orange?
00:26:51
>> I mean,
00:26:52
>> Pixel 2 HTC 2XL LG.
00:26:55
>> That's
00:26:56
>> made by
00:26:56
>> Mhm.
00:26:57
>> Wow. Wow. Well, you just kind of looked
00:26:59
up
00:27:00
>> Pixel 2. Well, that's Pixel 2.
00:27:02
>> Yeah.
00:27:02
>> You were talking about the Pixel One.
00:27:04
>> No, Pixel 3a.
00:27:06
>> Oh, the first a phone.
00:27:09
>> Okay.
00:27:10
>> I'm definitely not giving either of you
00:27:11
hints because you probably know this
00:27:13
exactly. I'm the one who needs a hint. I
00:27:15
think I know it, but we'll see.
00:27:16
>> They think they know it, they say.
00:27:18
>> All right,
00:27:18
>> we shall see.
00:27:19
>> Well, answers will be at the end like
00:27:20
usual. We'll be right back.
00:27:30
Support for the show comes from Framer.
00:27:32
A website should help your business
00:27:34
grow, not slow it down. If updates to
00:27:36
your.com feel harder than they should,
00:27:38
Framer is the shortcut you've been
00:27:39
looking for. Framer is a website builder
00:27:41
that can transform your.com from a mere
00:27:43
formality into a tool for growth.
00:27:45
They've already helped thousands of
00:27:46
businesses from earlystage startups to
00:27:48
Fortune 500s build better websites
00:27:51
faster. Framer is an enterprisegrade
00:27:53
noode website builder used by teams at
00:27:56
companies like Perplexity and Miro to
00:27:58
move faster. With real-time
00:28:00
collaboration, a robust CMS with
00:28:01
everything you need for great SEO, and
00:28:03
advanced analytics that include
00:28:05
integrated AB testing, your designers
00:28:07
and marketers are empowered to build and
00:28:09
maximize your.com from day one. Changes
00:28:11
to your Framer site go live to the web
00:28:13
in seconds with one click without help
00:28:15
from engineering. So whether you want to
00:28:17
launch a new site or test a few landing
00:28:18
pages or migrate your full.com, Framer
00:28:22
has programs for startups, scaleups, and
00:28:24
large enterprises to make going from
00:28:26
idea to live site as easy and fast as
00:28:28
possible. So learn how to get more out
00:28:29
of your.com from a framer specialist or
00:28:31
get started building for free today at
00:28:33
framer.com/wave
00:28:36
for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan.
00:28:39
That's framer.com/wave
00:28:40
for 30% off. framer.com/wave.
00:28:43
rules and restrictions may apply. All
00:28:45
right, welcome back. Uh it is February
00:28:49
which means we are getting now a little
00:28:51
bit more into the meat of the year. We
00:28:52
have a Samsung event coming up and we
00:28:54
also have just announced an Apple event
00:28:57
coming up. Uh I don't know what's going
00:29:00
to be announced at any of these events.
00:29:02
It could be anything but we can
00:29:05
speculate
00:29:07
plus nothing.
00:29:08
>> I think we know what's getting announced
00:29:09
at the Samsung event.
00:29:11
>> Yeah. Do we
00:29:12
>> the S2?
00:29:13
>> It could be anything. Andrew,
00:29:14
>> what if it's a folding?
00:29:16
>> They haven't said.
00:29:17
>> Why are your hands in your pockets?
00:29:19
>> Why are they Why are they spending so
00:29:21
much money on this on this launch event
00:29:22
in San Francisco when it's literally
00:29:25
somebody somebody put on Twitter the the
00:29:28
launch event from last year and they
00:29:30
said leaked S26 launch event. All the
00:29:33
comments were like, "Wow, so cool that
00:29:35
you got this or like literally nobody
00:29:37
even could realize that it was that it
00:29:39
was last year's." Samsung's official
00:29:40
invitation says, "Unpacked February
00:29:43
2026. The next AI phone makes your life
00:29:46
easier." That could be anything.
00:29:51
>> Maybe what if they This whole event is
00:29:53
just them reannouncing Bixby.
00:29:56
>> I I can't wait for that day.
00:29:58
>> Bixby comes back.
00:29:59
>> The Galaxy Home will finally come out.
00:30:01
>> It's going to be S26. S26. That was
00:30:03
peak.
00:30:03
>> The Galaxy phone finally launches.
00:30:05
>> Galaxy speaker. Anyway, but the Apple
00:30:07
event we actually don't know also, but
00:30:08
we uh kind of probably also do know.
00:30:10
Yeah, we can we can guess. What do we
00:30:12
hope gets in house at these types of
00:30:13
things?
00:30:14
>> Well, I wanted to see new Mac minis to
00:30:17
run Claude. Just kidding.
00:30:20
>> Um, no. No,
00:30:21
>> I'm only kind of kidding. Um, but there
00:30:24
are all these rumors of the new Apple A
00:30:28
series MacBook that we've been talking
00:30:29
about for many, many, many months now.
00:30:32
Yeah. And this seems to actually be the
00:30:34
thing that people are saying might come
00:30:35
out because the invitation that went out
00:30:38
for people with there's this March 4th
00:30:40
event that's happening that is
00:30:41
apparently just going to be sort of an
00:30:43
experience event and people are saying
00:30:45
that there's not going to be like a
00:30:46
keynote. They're going to release that
00:30:47
stuff separately.
00:30:48
>> But the colors in that launch event
00:30:50
poster are the colors that people are
00:30:53
saying that these MacBooks might be
00:30:54
colored as. It's like a light green, a
00:30:56
light yellow, sort of a sort of a really
00:30:58
cheap $700 model. Well, can I just say
00:31:01
every time we do the like speculation
00:31:03
about what the event invite means, I
00:31:05
always wish that someone had done like a
00:31:08
how close were we about previous event
00:31:12
invites and what it actually ended up
00:31:14
being.
00:31:15
>> Someone's probably done that.
00:31:16
>> I think someone's done they've like
00:31:17
analyzed every invite and then
00:31:19
>> and like what the hint was and what it
00:31:20
turned out to be.
00:31:21
>> Okay, so this is the possible new colors
00:31:24
of this colorful new
00:31:25
>> cheaper entry-level MacBook powered by
00:31:27
an A series chip.
00:31:28
>> Yeah,
00:31:29
>> I'm very interested in this. I think
00:31:31
right now we're in a spot where like
00:31:32
Apple silicon's gotten super super good.
00:31:34
And whenever we talk about MacBook Air,
00:31:36
which is the current cheapest laptop
00:31:38
they make,
00:31:39
>> it is such an easy to recommend $1,000
00:31:42
$1,100 laptop. It's almost like the
00:31:44
default way of getting into Apple
00:31:45
laptops.
00:31:47
>> But there are lots of laptops that are
00:31:48
way cheaper than that. And the Mac Mini
00:31:50
came out and was maybe the best deal in
00:31:52
tech at like $600 and being just enough
00:31:55
computer for anyone who just needs a
00:31:57
computer. But what if you need a laptop
00:31:59
and you have $600? This is a spot that
00:32:01
Apple can probably ship a ton of
00:32:04
laptops.
00:32:04
>> Oh my god.
00:32:05
>> And if the A series chip is good enough,
00:32:08
like they don't need to ship an M1 in
00:32:10
this thing, they can ship an A series
00:32:12
chip in super high volume, it could be a
00:32:15
winner. I mean, they really want to
00:32:16
compete with uh the Chromebooks on the
00:32:18
education front because Google really
00:32:20
locks people the hell in. I mean, I
00:32:22
think the fact that they came out with
00:32:23
the education bundle so recently, the
00:32:27
creative apps for education and all that
00:32:29
stuff is not a coincidence because the
00:32:31
biggest the biggest thing that really
00:32:33
moves people through Google's ecosystem
00:32:35
is using Chromebooks while they're in
00:32:37
elementary school and they just have
00:32:38
Google accounts. They just continue on
00:32:40
with it. So, Apple's like, "We really
00:32:41
want a piece of that pie."
00:32:42
>> And considering if they're selling this
00:32:44
to consumers at $700, I would imagine
00:32:47
that they would give them to uh schools
00:32:49
for even cheaper.
00:32:50
>> Yeah. So they could really they could
00:32:52
really ship a lot of these. But I think
00:32:54
most people don't need the power of M5,
00:32:57
M4, you know, in their laptops.
00:32:59
>> Yeah.
00:32:59
>> So honestly, like an A18, it's basically
00:33:03
just an iPad, but with a interface that
00:33:06
makes sense. I think that that could be
00:33:08
a winner. Yeah. It's funny because
00:33:09
there's this whole other slate of
00:33:11
possible things we're thinking Apple
00:33:13
might announce. Another one is a
00:33:15
touchscreen MacBook Pro. Maybe at like
00:33:17
some point late this year or next year,
00:33:19
something like that. Yeah.
00:33:20
>> And so we're kind of keeping an eye on
00:33:22
how Mac OS is evolving and what the app
00:33:24
situation looks like and how that's
00:33:26
happening. Uh and obviously they're so
00:33:29
similar in architecture anyway, like
00:33:30
you're running lots of of those apps. It
00:33:32
it makes total sense that an A series
00:33:34
chip would work in a cheap MacBook.
00:33:37
>> Yeah.
00:33:37
>> But it now makes even more sense that we
00:33:39
could see a touchscreen version of Mac
00:33:41
OS.
00:33:41
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
00:33:43
>> It is interesting because the what
00:33:44
happens to the MacBook Air? I mean, they
00:33:47
kind of created this really, really big
00:33:49
pipeline of computers at that point
00:33:51
where the MacBook Air was supposed to be
00:33:53
the cheapest, most affordable model and
00:33:56
it's 13 in. So, is the only
00:33:59
differentiating factor going to be the
00:34:00
fact that it has a not as strong
00:34:02
processor. The main thing
00:34:04
>> Air will go back to meaning middle. I
00:34:07
think it would be middle, but like I'd
00:34:08
assume the if we're if we're guessing
00:34:12
that this A18 version of the MacBook is
00:34:14
going to be something almost like a
00:34:16
Chromebook that we give to schools, I'd
00:34:17
assume the chassis that it's in is going
00:34:19
to be pretty
00:34:20
>> a little cheaper.
00:34:21
>> Yeah. Yeah. A cheaper version of it,
00:34:23
which means thicker, which means
00:34:24
probably more ports and stuff like that
00:34:25
for kids when So then like are we
00:34:29
assuming this is the like
00:34:31
>> the cheaper in all aspects version of
00:34:33
the MacBook? Then the Air is kind of
00:34:35
like the in between. I understand I
00:34:37
don't need a ton of processing power or
00:34:39
ports. Thinner, I'm traveling all the
00:34:41
time. Gets everything done I need to be
00:34:43
the cheaper I don't say grown-up
00:34:45
version, but and then then we have the
00:34:47
pros that are pro models.
00:34:49
>> Yeah, I I kind of see it as an expansion
00:34:51
of the lineup downward. And I don't know
00:34:54
what to expect ports wise from this. I
00:34:57
think naturally if it's going to
00:34:59
education, you have to have a couple of
00:35:00
ports, but I could see Apple not doing
00:35:03
that, which is interesting.
00:35:04
>> Everything's on USB ports.
00:35:05
>> Yeah, maybe not more ports.
00:35:06
>> Do you even do you But all that
00:35:08
education stuff is on the internet.
00:35:10
>> That's a good point.
00:35:10
>> Do you really need any ports besides a
00:35:12
charging port?
00:35:13
>> I just I always picture an HDMI port,
00:35:15
but I haven't been in a classroom in so
00:35:17
long that I'm not even sure you need
00:35:18
that anymore.
00:35:19
>> The kids don't need it.
00:35:20
>> They definitely don't need an HDMI.
00:35:21
>> The kids don't need it. HDMI is like
00:35:22
only for the pros.
00:35:23
>> I guess if you want to think about it of
00:35:25
like the iPad lineup of like they had an
00:35:28
iPad mini, an iPad Pro, and then they
00:35:30
had the like iPad for education one that
00:35:33
still had the old button and everything
00:35:34
for super super cheap. Like
00:35:37
>> this MacBook would be that I guess.
00:35:39
>> Exactly. Yeah. So it puts iPad it puts
00:35:41
Air in the middle again. So in the iPad
00:35:43
lineup it's iPad, then there's Air and
00:35:45
there's iPad Pro
00:35:47
>> and then Air is in the middle. So the
00:35:48
MacBooks it would be like the MacBook.
00:35:50
This is like the 12-inch MacBook they
00:35:51
wanted to do well. I literally have that
00:35:52
pulled up right now. It's like a
00:35:54
slightly smaller, slightly cheaper,
00:35:56
slightly underpowered, but totally fine
00:35:58
for most people laptop. And then if you
00:36:00
really need the upgrade, okay, here's a
00:36:01
bigger screen. Here's a bigger battery.
00:36:02
It's the MacBook Air. It's 1,100 bucks
00:36:04
and it's all the computer you probably
00:36:06
need. And then the pros for the people
00:36:08
who need that.
00:36:08
>> Yeah,
00:36:09
>> Air is in the middle again.
00:36:10
>> And then what else is Air? I mean,
00:36:12
iPhone Air is kind of in the middle.
00:36:13
Sort of. Price-wise, it's technically in
00:36:15
the middle.
00:36:16
>> So, yeah, it kind of works.
00:36:17
>> True. it. Um, it's rumored to have a
00:36:19
12.9 inch display whereas the MacBook
00:36:21
Air has 13.6. Not a huge difference
00:36:24
there. It's something. I was really
00:36:26
hoping they would go for an actual like
00:36:28
12 in super hyper portable display,
00:36:30
especially if they're trying to get into
00:36:31
the educ like the education market where
00:36:33
kids backpacks are like the size of a
00:36:35
purse. I think that could be really
00:36:36
helpful.
00:36:37
>> Am I the only one just straight up
00:36:38
picturing the MacBook from 2015?
00:36:40
>> No. Yeah, for sure. 12in MacBook. Make
00:36:42
the bezel bigger and that or smaller.
00:36:44
You know what's funny about this? I
00:36:45
mean, I would love that. I think that
00:36:47
the 12-inch MacBook, hear me out, and
00:36:50
the trash can Mac Pro have a lot in
00:36:52
common. Ready? Ready for this? I'm gonna
00:36:55
blow your mind. I'm
00:36:56
>> ready.
00:36:57
>> This was back in the in the earlier days
00:36:59
of almost like late Johnny Eye of Apple
00:37:01
of ultra minimalism where they had an
00:37:04
idea of a computer that they wanted to
00:37:06
make, but they didn't have the silicon
00:37:07
to really make it a reasonable computer.
00:37:09
>> Concepts of a computer. So, the Mac Pro
00:37:12
trash can was like this ultra small
00:37:15
single fan computer with like a Intel
00:37:18
chip in there and like dual Radeon GPUs.
00:37:21
It was ridiculous. It was crazy that
00:37:22
they even tried that, but they did. And
00:37:25
it was a computer that would readily
00:37:26
overheat and leave dead pixels in your
00:37:28
video exports, but it was a thing that
00:37:31
they probably could have done with Apple
00:37:32
Silicon a couple of years later really,
00:37:34
really well.
00:37:35
The 12-in MacBook is the same thing.
00:37:37
That was powered by an Intel Core M3 or
00:37:40
i5 or i7 or whatever back in 2017.
00:37:43
>> And it was a smaller, a little bit
00:37:46
underpowered, a little bit too much heat
00:37:47
throttle type of computer where like if
00:37:49
they had Apple Silicon back then, that
00:37:51
would have actually been a reasonable
00:37:53
computer. So, I think this is them
00:37:55
revisiting that concept. I don't think
00:37:57
they're going to revisit that trash can
00:37:59
Mac Pro. I think that's just Mac Studio
00:38:00
now. But that's like the too early for
00:38:03
Mac, too early for Apple silicon idea
00:38:06
that can come around and actually be
00:38:07
good again.
00:38:08
>> I wish that they would release the trash
00:38:10
can again as the trash can fan edition
00:38:12
Mac Pro.
00:38:12
>> They could
00:38:13
>> with an M chip. That would be so sick.
00:38:15
>> I have so many other thoughts about Mac
00:38:16
Pro. Mac Pro is basically dead. Yeah,
00:38:20
>> I think and we're we can get to some of
00:38:21
these other rumors because we're
00:38:22
expecting more M5 MacBook Pros and like
00:38:25
higherend like finishing out the M5 chip
00:38:29
lineup like an M5 Pro and an M5 Max.
00:38:32
>> Whether Ultra ever gets upgraded from M2
00:38:34
Ultra, I'm not sure
00:38:36
>> cuz yeah, the Mac Pro is still on M2
00:38:38
Ultra.
00:38:38
>> Yeah,
00:38:39
>> at this point there is an M3 Ultra chip.
00:38:41
It's only in Mac Studio. There is no M4
00:38:43
Ultra chip yet. If they did make it,
00:38:46
does that mean you cannot buy a Mac Pro
00:38:49
that can do ray tracing then? Because I
00:38:52
think ray tracing was added an M3.
00:38:55
>> Look that up. Someone fact check me on
00:38:56
that.
00:38:57
>> If that's true, then yeah,
00:38:58
>> that's crazy. That's a bummer. RTX on,
00:39:00
baby. RTX.
00:39:01
>> I have a Mac Pro on my desk. I've been
00:39:03
using and editing it. It's M2 Ultra.
00:39:04
It's a great computer. I also have one
00:39:08
internal PCI card in there. It's got
00:39:10
like a 90 terbte SSD RAID and that's
00:39:13
super useful for my backup. There is no
00:39:15
reason I should be using a Mac Pro
00:39:17
still. I should just use a Mac Studio.
00:39:19
>> They're so funny cuz they're like 90%
00:39:21
air on the inside.
00:39:22
>> Yeah, it's just Airflow.
00:39:24
>> That's the Mac Air.
00:39:25
>> So, I might as well at this point like
00:39:27
my next desktop computer is I think an
00:39:30
M5 Ultra Mac Studio with like a single
00:39:34
Thunderbolt cable to like my little SSD
00:39:36
backup. I think that's what it has to be
00:39:38
because I think Mac Pro is just Apple's
00:39:40
done with like giving that attention and
00:39:41
resources
00:39:42
>> because what you should do is they make
00:39:43
these like rack units that have for a
00:39:46
Mac Studio that have a Thunderbolt port
00:39:48
like built into the back. So as soon as
00:39:50
you put it in the rack, it like plugs
00:39:51
into the Thunderbolt and then it adds to
00:39:54
like one or two PCIe card slots in it.
00:39:59
>> So you can still use your giant hard
00:40:00
drive. And what's really cool is there's
00:40:02
like this a lot of them have this
00:40:03
mechanical situation where you push a
00:40:05
button on the front that pushes an
00:40:07
armature that links around the back. So
00:40:09
it moves the power button to the front.
00:40:11
>> Oh, that's hilarious.
00:40:12
>> It's funny cuz I the difference now that
00:40:14
Thunderbolt 5 is out, it's it's enough
00:40:17
bandwidth for me to do what I was going
00:40:19
to do with that PCI storage. I think
00:40:20
there's still people who use PCI for
00:40:22
other things they need all that
00:40:22
bandwidth for, but for me accessing like
00:40:24
40 terabytes of backup footage,
00:40:27
>> I can edit off of a Thunderbolt 5 drive
00:40:29
at this point. Yeah, you're going to
00:40:31
need to edit off of those drives you
00:40:32
already have because the cost of storage
00:40:33
is up 10x from what it was a year ago.
00:40:36
>> Yeah.
00:40:37
>> So, so yeah, I think my Mac Pro is is on
00:40:39
its way out at some point and I'm hoping
00:40:41
to see an M5 Ultra even though we don't
00:40:43
even have M4 Ultra yet.
00:40:44
>> It would be nice. It'd be nice. Yeah.
00:40:46
Well, speaking of, there's some other
00:40:47
things that we're probably going to see.
00:40:48
Probably an M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook
00:40:51
Pro because they still have not released
00:40:54
M5 Pro and M5 Max. That's correct,
00:40:56
right?
00:40:56
>> Yep.
00:40:56
>> No, no Mac Mini with M5 Pro.
00:40:58
>> Just base M5. They haven't talked about
00:40:59
the Mac Mini. Um, apparently some new
00:41:02
potentially cheaper displays which would
00:41:05
could be cool because currently you've
00:41:07
got the studio display which is cheaper
00:41:10
and then you've got the Pro Display XDR
00:41:13
which has not been updated in a really
00:41:14
really really long time.
00:41:16
>> Maybe something in the middle could be
00:41:18
nice. You know, something that's Pro but
00:41:20
isn't $6,000.
00:41:21
>> Both of those displays are in a really
00:41:23
weird place in the market. Like Andrew,
00:41:25
you know a lot more about like displays
00:41:27
and the variety of displays you can get,
00:41:30
but I just feel like the Pro Display XDR
00:41:32
is a $5,000 monitor.
00:41:34
>> Well, and a thousand stand.
00:41:35
>> Plus $1,000 stand plus $1,000 nano
00:41:37
texture coding that's on mine. It's like
00:41:40
and it's a 60 Hz display. So on paper it
00:41:42
looks ridiculous, but it has the
00:41:43
brightness. It has the color
00:41:44
calibration. It has like what we need
00:41:46
for everyone on the studio seeing the
00:41:48
exact same color, which is awesome.
00:41:50
The studio display, correct me if I'm
00:41:53
wrong, $1,700, I think.
00:41:55
>> I think it's $1,700.
00:41:56
>> Also 60 Hz.
00:41:58
>> Yeah.
00:41:58
>> 27 in display. It's It's kind of It gets
00:42:01
pitched by Apple in these like kind of
00:42:03
creative scenarios sometimes cuz it's a
00:42:05
studio display.
00:42:06
>> Yeah.
00:42:06
>> But also like the display for your
00:42:08
bedroom or the display for just the
00:42:10
computer you have in your house. It's
00:42:11
kind of a silly buy. The rumor is going
00:42:14
to be studio display 2.
00:42:17
>> Okay.
00:42:17
>> So, just update to it. And this is from
00:42:19
95 Mac and they're saying that they are
00:42:21
thinking it will have a higher refresh
00:42:23
rate either 90 or 120 Hz,
00:42:24
>> please.
00:42:25
>> Uh an A19 chip in it because currently
00:42:28
it has the A13 Bionic chip in it. That's
00:42:30
uh to allow this camera and speakers and
00:42:32
stuff to do all the Apple magic.
00:42:34
>> Sure.
00:42:34
>> Uh potentially a miniLEDD display
00:42:37
>> which could be good. And HDR support.
00:42:39
>> Sure.
00:42:40
>> So, and that is probably I think all I
00:42:42
would need of that computer and
00:42:44
hopefully it's reasonably priced. Not
00:42:45
sure I can cross my fingers.
00:42:47
>> Well, the last part. Yes,
00:42:48
>> say goodbye to, but
00:42:49
>> I imagine it'll be about the same price.
00:42:50
I think that there are just not that
00:42:52
many good Thunderbolt displays right
00:42:54
now. And that's what a lot of people
00:42:56
come back to when they talk about the
00:42:58
Studio Display is like it's lacking on a
00:43:00
lot of features, but there are just not
00:43:02
a lot of displays where you can just
00:43:04
plug in one cable and everything just
00:43:05
works perfectly.
00:43:06
>> Yeah, there's a small handful. I've seen
00:43:08
some reviews. There's like the LG Ultra
00:43:10
Fine stuff and I think we have like a
00:43:12
Dell one now that I've I've gotten
00:43:14
really It's like the giant 5K big. Uh,
00:43:17
so there's some there's some interesting
00:43:18
choices out there. Almost all of them
00:43:20
are at least higher refresh rate. I
00:43:22
can't believe Apple's still shipping
00:43:23
like this expensive a display at 60 Hz.
00:43:25
>> It's hard to compare like you said the
00:43:27
Pro Display XDR because you're looking
00:43:28
at things that are like color
00:43:30
calibrated. And once you start getting
00:43:31
into those monitors, they're niche as
00:43:33
well and super expensive. So if you were
00:43:35
looking at pure specs, you could
00:43:36
probably find 800 monitors that are
00:43:39
better
00:43:39
>> for six grand.
00:43:40
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
00:43:41
>> But then you get into that so niche and
00:43:44
they're
00:43:44
>> in color calibration world. There's like
00:43:46
$40,000 monitors that
00:43:47
>> you want a cheese grater on the back,
00:43:49
which is the most important part that's
00:43:50
behind your wall.
00:43:51
>> It's huge. Yeah. Every day I walk around
00:43:53
the side of my desk and I just check the
00:43:55
back just to make sure the cheese grater
00:43:56
holes are still there.
00:43:57
>> Nice. Nice.
00:43:59
>> Uh yeah. And then some other potential
00:44:00
updates. A18 base iPad. So just kind of
00:44:03
bumping that up. M4 iPad Air. So it's in
00:44:05
the middle. Finally getting M4. iPhone
00:44:08
17e, which again we don't really expect
00:44:10
anything to be different from the 16.
00:44:12
It's going to be so funny.
00:44:14
>> They got to have Max.
00:44:15
>> I hope they do the same thing Pixel just
00:44:18
did because if 16e was already bust of
00:44:21
the air last year, terrible phone to
00:44:23
buy. If 17e is exactly the same when
00:44:26
they then made the base 17 like a deal.
00:44:30
Like we finally said an iPhone was a
00:44:32
deal. If then it's the same as the 16e,
00:44:34
it's going to be somehow a worse deal
00:44:37
than it already was.
00:44:38
>> Head scratching. That would be crazy.
00:44:39
and none of us would be surprised by it
00:44:41
at all.
00:44:42
>> So, it's just a new chip and maybe the
00:44:44
new like dynamic island, I guess. Is
00:44:47
that it? I guess
00:44:48
>> I can't even remember what the
00:44:49
>> I don't even have
00:44:52
60 Hz notch
00:44:54
>> thicker bezels, no Mag Safe, no fast
00:44:58
charge. It has wireless charging um but
00:45:00
no magnets obviously.
00:45:01
>> Yeah.
00:45:02
>> And like black or white are the only
00:45:03
colors. Single camera, like really truly
00:45:06
a base phone. like single speakers at
00:45:08
the bottom, like really bass phone.
00:45:10
>> I don't see them changing a lot of that
00:45:12
stuff. They're just going to probably do
00:45:13
a chip bump and maybe a display bump to
00:45:16
like the at this point like the the
00:45:18
first dynamic island LCD that they ever
00:45:20
made. Did they ever do an LCD dynamic
00:45:22
island? Maybe not. So maybe it's an
00:45:24
OLED. Maybe it's an OLED.
00:45:25
>> Only OLED. Yeah, I would that would have
00:45:27
to be OLED if it was Dynamic Island.
00:45:28
>> So that'd be cool. Yeah. And then I
00:45:30
guess the same phone otherwise sadly.
00:45:33
>> Yep. Starting at 600 bucks. Hm.
00:45:37
>> Yeah.
00:45:37
>> Okay. 16e is already OLED, so that's
00:45:39
good. It'll be OLED. That's good.
00:45:40
>> It seems like it's quite a month of um
00:45:44
quote unquote updating things.
00:45:45
>> Slight updates for
00:45:46
>> slight updates. It's like Samsung,
00:45:48
Google, and Apple are all just not
00:45:51
really updating things. They're
00:45:52
>> And these these are still the companies
00:45:54
that are like mega companies that are
00:45:55
big enough to not be as price sensitive
00:45:59
with memory with all that's happening.
00:46:01
Yeah. Right. Like we think GPUs, memory,
00:46:03
all that stuff.
00:46:04
>> Yeah, that's the I mean, I think Apple
00:46:06
can basically just eat the cost at this
00:46:07
point. Even if it eats into their margin
00:46:09
to the point where they lose money, I
00:46:10
think that they're willing to eat the
00:46:12
cost thinking that maybe within a year
00:46:14
memory will go back down because they
00:46:15
don't want to be unstable and
00:46:16
dynamically change their pricing
00:46:18
constantly, especially for a mega
00:46:19
corporation like that and that would be
00:46:20
a bad look.
00:46:22
>> Um, we do have one more event though.
00:46:24
the there's going to be a nothing event
00:46:26
for the nothing 4A on the 5th and Carl
00:46:30
Pay decided to do what Carl Pay does and
00:46:32
he took the Apple event invite and he uh
00:46:34
made a little Photoshop spray paint
00:46:36
thing of nothing and over the Apple logo
00:46:40
and then put March 5th instead of March
00:46:42
4th. Um, neat
00:46:44
>> funny kind of almost a call back
00:46:46
>> almost a call back to 2018 when there
00:46:50
was going to be a OnePlus event that
00:46:51
Carl was the head of
00:46:53
>> and they announced it and it was a big
00:46:54
fanf fair and then two weeks before the
00:46:57
before Apple was like actually we're
00:46:58
going to have an event on that day and
00:47:00
then OnePlus had to literally move to a
00:47:02
week later because they're like we
00:47:04
literally cannot compete.
00:47:05
>> They move it a week. I thought they
00:47:05
moved to like one day they moved it a
00:47:07
week.
00:47:08
>> I think they moved it a week later. It
00:47:10
was really funny though because everyone
00:47:11
in my world was like, "So, which one are
00:47:13
you going to?" Yeah, we all knew.
00:47:16
>> If this is a call back to that,
00:47:18
>> I'll give Carl some credit for this.
00:47:20
It's funny. I think if you can joke
00:47:22
about something funny that happened to
00:47:24
you in the past that probably screwed up
00:47:25
a lot of things.
00:47:26
>> Yeah. Well, ironically, this 4A seems to
00:47:28
be the only thing that has a new design.
00:47:30
So,
00:47:31
>> I guess you got to give you got to give
00:47:33
credit where it's due.
00:47:34
>> Fair enough. I've got a kind of a thing
00:47:36
here on we're getting a lot of tweets
00:47:38
>> because Apple just announced video
00:47:41
podcasts through Apple podcasts
00:47:44
>> and obviously
00:47:46
>> like Spotify a lot of people have been
00:47:47
asking us if we are going to put it on.
00:47:48
So let me um explain what's happening
00:47:51
and then explain if we will be on it or
00:47:53
not. Uh they lost launched their video
00:47:55
podcast experience on the podcast app
00:47:57
which lets people stream through HTTP
00:48:00
live streaming and you will be able to
00:48:02
download for offline viewing. Um, this
00:48:05
is something they just announced on
00:48:06
Monday, I think it was. In their press
00:48:07
release, Apple said, "We are putting
00:48:09
creators in full control of their
00:48:10
content and how they build their
00:48:12
businesses while making it easier than
00:48:13
ever for audiences to listen to or watch
00:48:15
podcasts." So, everyone's asking us,
00:48:18
will we be putting it on it? And right
00:48:19
now, the answer is no, because we can't
00:48:22
because Megaphone is not one of the
00:48:24
partners that's working with this. So
00:48:25
far, it is opening with uh art 19, Omni
00:48:29
Studio, Simplecast, and Ads Wiz. Those
00:48:32
are all the platforms of publishing that
00:48:34
will be able to use this. Does say there
00:48:37
will be more participating partners
00:48:38
later. Um, but we're in the Vox Media
00:48:40
Podcast Network and we use Megaphone,
00:48:42
which is also owned by Spotify. So, I
00:48:44
don't know when they will be joining the
00:48:45
Apple podcast video platform for this.
00:48:48
Um, but it is kind of cool that they're
00:48:51
allowing dynamically inserted video ads,
00:48:54
including host reads, which is a big
00:48:56
thing in video podcasting right now.
00:48:58
That's still kind of weird. If you watch
00:48:59
us on YouTube, those are obviously not
00:49:01
dynamically inserted. They're based
00:49:03
videos. Till that gets added, we'll see
00:49:05
what that does. Um, podcasting and
00:49:08
podcast ads are so based on dynamically
00:49:10
inserted ads because when you're just
00:49:12
downloading and streaming audio all the
00:49:14
time, it gets swapped out and that's
00:49:15
kind of how people can find ways to
00:49:18
advertise on there. It's much easier
00:49:20
when you can't see if the host is
00:49:21
wearing a different shirt or not. Um, on
00:49:23
video podcast, we re-record our ads
00:49:26
every week. I think Vox thinks we're
00:49:28
crazy that we do that, but we do because
00:49:30
we like things to be as high quality as
00:49:33
they are, even if it's an ad you're
00:49:34
gonna skip. Um, so we'll see what that
00:49:37
does. The reason we're we still have to
00:49:39
see how this plays out though because
00:49:41
the way Spotify did video and the reason
00:49:43
we're one of the reasons we're still not
00:49:44
on there is like we were worried and it
00:49:48
might still take over the if they take
00:49:49
the video audio and turn that into the
00:49:52
audio thing. We might lose all of the
00:49:54
advertising that's coming through Vox or
00:49:57
whichever podcast network we're with.
00:49:59
And
00:49:59
>> if they're doing their weird ads just
00:50:01
from Spotify if Apple were to do
00:50:03
something like that. I don't know. We
00:50:05
need to see what it does because I don't
00:50:06
think people realize how much ads and
00:50:08
podcasts is what
00:50:10
>> makes or breaks a podcast.
00:50:11
>> And also just to be transparent like
00:50:13
we're we're we're we're half a podcast
00:50:15
or half a YouTube channel basically. And
00:50:18
we need to keep getting views on YouTube
00:50:20
because that's how we grow and make
00:50:22
money, discoverability, that kind of
00:50:23
stuff.
00:50:24
>> And it's just kind of awkward now that
00:50:26
everyone's like just put it in here
00:50:28
because we don't get paid for that. So,
00:50:30
I understand the the flexibility and
00:50:33
being able to jump between the audio and
00:50:34
the video in the same app is nice, but
00:50:36
if if the waveform YouTube channel
00:50:39
starts getting less and less views
00:50:40
because people are watching it on
00:50:41
Spotify and and Apple podcast and then
00:50:43
we don't get money for that, it's kind
00:50:45
of hard to
00:50:46
>> It's also weird.
00:50:47
>> It'll be once like podcast networks who
00:50:50
seem pretty be I don't want to say
00:50:52
behind, but the pod podcasting in
00:50:55
general is not really up to date with
00:50:57
advertising everywhere else. So once
00:50:59
they get stuff working and figuring out
00:51:02
rates and stuff like that, it could
00:51:03
totally work. And I I wonder how much we
00:51:06
would lose on if it would be on Spotify,
00:51:08
like if it's just our audio listeners
00:51:10
wanting to hop into video, if that would
00:51:12
actually hit our YouTube at all. There's
00:51:14
>> there's just a lot more to it than just
00:51:15
can you post it on
00:51:16
>> Yeah. Like the reason Joe Rogan took
00:51:18
that $10 million deal or whatever it
00:51:21
was, $100 million
00:51:22
>> is because we turned it down.
00:51:24
>> Cuz we Yeah. Because they were he was
00:51:25
the B plan. But the reason he took the
00:51:27
$100 million deal was like he was making
00:51:29
a lot of money on YouTube.
00:51:31
>> Yeah. That's how much it cost to
00:51:32
convince him to not put it on YouTube.
00:51:34
>> Exactly.
00:51:34
>> Yeah.
00:51:35
>> So, yeah. And I think it's also, you
00:51:37
know, worth remembering that YouTube is
00:51:39
still technically the largest podcast
00:51:43
platform and has a lot of influence on
00:51:45
how podcasts get made and shared. And we
00:51:47
are a podcast, but as you said, we're
00:51:49
we're a YouTube channel as well. And so
00:51:51
there's different things we optimize for
00:51:52
and different formats that you you lean
00:51:54
into.
00:51:54
>> Yeah. Yeah. So,
00:51:55
>> Apple podcast does a decent job of doing
00:51:57
like charts and different suggested
00:51:59
shows. So, I think some some podcasters
00:52:01
who maybe are smaller that have video or
00:52:04
like introducing it to that might
00:52:06
introduce you to a new audience.
00:52:07
>> Totally.
00:52:07
>> Um, which could be cool, but in terms of
00:52:10
us doing it quite yet,
00:52:12
>> we've got a lot of stuff to figure out
00:52:14
before we hop on that. I think Apple
00:52:15
podcast may be in my opinion, in my
00:52:18
limited experience, the only other
00:52:20
podcast platform that is big enough and
00:52:22
has enough discoverability through those
00:52:24
charts that you could be swayed to go,
00:52:26
"All right, we should be putting
00:52:28
everything on Apple Podcast because
00:52:31
people will find us there and we'll
00:52:33
chart there sometimes and get new
00:52:34
viewership there." I could see that.
00:52:36
>> Yeah,
00:52:36
>> it's much easier to convince someone
00:52:38
about YouTube there. But
00:52:39
>> yeah, I could see that.
00:52:40
>> And either way, competition is good.
00:52:42
Like if Vimeo ever got big enough to be
00:52:44
competitive to YouTube, people would
00:52:46
have better ad rates on YouTube.
00:52:48
>> It's true.
00:52:48
>> So
00:52:49
>> there' be Vimeo podcast.
00:52:50
>> Yeah. If Spotify and Apple and YouTube
00:52:53
all want to like battle it out on who
00:52:54
pays the most to video viewers, then go
00:52:57
at it. Like
00:52:58
>> be my guest.
00:52:59
>> Be my guest. That would be nice.
00:53:01
>> We love it. Is podcasting dead?
00:53:03
>> Podcasting is more of a concept.
00:53:06
>> That's fair.
00:53:06
>> I think that it's not what it used to
00:53:08
be. Everything's just a talk show now.
00:53:10
>> Yeah, pretty much. I feel like the
00:53:11
beauty of podcasting before was that you
00:53:13
could just record something, put it on
00:53:14
RSS, and like be done with it.
00:53:16
>> Yeah.
00:53:16
>> To have like ads now. The problem I wish
00:53:19
there was like just some free third
00:53:21
party thing where we can upload our own
00:53:23
video
00:53:24
>> protocol. If only there was some way to
00:53:27
like insert it dynamically in an open
00:53:30
manner into each video.
00:53:32
>> That'd be crazy.
00:53:33
>> Yeah. But YouTube, Spotify, Apple, none
00:53:34
of these platforms are ever going to let
00:53:36
that happen. So this is the the
00:53:38
conundrum we're in where this podcast
00:53:40
industry is kind of exploding. It's on
00:53:42
Netflix now. HBO has podcast.
00:53:45
>> It's just like there's so many different
00:53:47
places to upload video. The fear too is
00:53:49
like while we're with a podcast network
00:53:51
that does audio ads and stuff like that
00:53:53
is going through an RSS feed and where
00:53:55
whenever we start seeing Spotify or
00:53:57
Apple trying to do it, it's like well
00:53:58
what cut are they going to start trying
00:54:00
to take or figuring out or controlling
00:54:02
ads and jumping on it first as a
00:54:05
established place doesn't seem like the
00:54:06
best idea.
00:54:07
>> If there were an open federated
00:54:09
protocol, we wouldn't have to have a
00:54:11
middleman. Just saying. Maybe that's
00:54:13
something I should vibe code it with my
00:54:14
Claudebot at Claude Con. Claw Con or
00:54:17
whatever it's called. Okay. Well, um, we
00:54:20
love games on this podcast. We have
00:54:22
lately been playing more and more games
00:54:24
just like people keep playing games with
00:54:26
my heart. So, I think Adam is going to
00:54:29
do a game with us after we do this
00:54:31
second trivia question.
00:54:34
>> We do less games if phone companies made
00:54:36
phones fun at all anymore.
00:54:38
>> You can't afford this.
00:54:39
>> That's right. If you're a gamer, you
00:54:42
cannot afford this. I'm sorry,
00:54:44
>> guys. Earlier in the episode, we talked
00:54:46
about Ring, but Ring was not always
00:54:50
called
00:54:52
Ring.
00:54:53
>> Weren't they on Shark Tank?
00:54:55
>> They were on Shark Tank.
00:54:56
>> They were.
00:54:57
>> They were Shark Tank.
00:54:58
>> And Kevin Olirri tried to get it and he
00:54:59
said no.
00:55:00
>> He They didn't make a deal. And then
00:55:01
they went on to sell to Amazon for a baz
00:55:04
a billion. Was it a billion? I believe.
00:55:06
Same as Instagram. A bazil.
00:55:08
>> Yeah, it was a bazil.
00:55:09
>> A bazillion.
00:55:10
>> A bazil. Yeah.
00:55:10
>> Jeff Bezos was like, I could do so much
00:55:12
evil with this.
00:55:15
Surveillance Day, you say?
00:55:17
>> Melania movie, you say?
00:55:19
>> Um, but before it was called Ring, was
00:55:21
it called
00:55:22
>> Surveillance Day?
00:55:23
>> A doorbot,
00:55:26
B. Campbell,
00:55:28
or C. Stoop watcher.
00:55:32
>> There's no way it was any of those.
00:55:35
>> Campbell. Yeah. Wait, I'm not going to.
00:55:37
>> It's one of those three terrible names.
00:55:39
>> Yeah. So,
00:55:40
>> I love my Campbell soup.
00:55:42
>> Yeah. I was going to say they was sued
00:55:44
immediately if they used Campbell.
00:55:45
>> It was like how like Amazon's original
00:55:47
name was like Abra or something. Like
00:55:49
all of these companies like start off
00:55:50
with something goofy and then eventually
00:55:51
hire a marketer who's like, "Okay, we
00:55:53
got to do something about this."
00:55:54
>> Abra at least is like the other ones are
00:55:57
just
00:55:58
>> attempting to do a pun really poorly.
00:56:00
That sounds like what chat GPT would
00:56:02
tell me if I was trying to make
00:56:03
>> what the internet. I didn't get any like
00:56:04
primary sources to confirm this, but
00:56:06
what the internet sort of seemed to
00:56:07
indicate was that like they started off
00:56:09
like as a camera company like like
00:56:11
camera for your house and that was not
00:56:15
marketing well. And so they pivoted to
00:56:17
being a smart doorbell that happened to
00:56:20
have a camera. And now that people are
00:56:22
just okay with being surveiled 24/7 now
00:56:25
they're like, "We're a camera company."
00:56:26
I guess not. I guess they try to be
00:56:27
like, "Guys, we're a camera company.
00:56:29
here's a Super Bowl ad. And everyone was
00:56:30
like, I didn't like that. Just just go
00:56:33
ring ring. Someone's at the front door.
00:56:35
>> We'll think about it. We'll be right
00:56:37
back.
00:56:46
Support for the show comes from Shopify.
00:56:48
The early days of starting a business
00:56:50
are equal parts exciting and terrifying.
00:56:52
It's a big risk, but it's one worth
00:56:54
taking as long as you have the right
00:56:55
tools. And if e-commerce is part of your
00:56:57
new business, here's a tip. Shopify.
00:57:00
Shopify is the commerce platform used by
00:57:01
millions of businesses around the world.
00:57:03
They say they can help you tackle all
00:57:04
these important tasks in one place. From
00:57:06
inventory to payments to analytics and
00:57:08
more. Uh no need to save multiple
00:57:10
websites or try to figure out what
00:57:12
platform is hosting the tool you need.
00:57:13
Everything's all in one place, making
00:57:15
your life easier and your business
00:57:16
operations smoother. Let Shopify be your
00:57:19
commerce expert with worldclass
00:57:20
expertise in everything from managing
00:57:22
inventory to international shipping to
00:57:24
processing returns and beyond. You can
00:57:26
get started with your own design studio.
00:57:28
With hundreds of readytouse templates,
00:57:30
Shopify helps you build a beautiful
00:57:31
online store that matches your brand's
00:57:33
style. It's time to turn those whatifs
00:57:35
into
00:57:37
with Shopify today. You can sign up for
00:57:39
your $1 per month trial and start
00:57:41
selling today at shopify.com/wwayform.
00:57:44
So go to shopify.com/wwayform.
00:57:46
That's shopify.com/waveform.
00:57:51
Welcome back. We are going to play two
00:57:53
truths and a lie. Producer table versus
00:57:57
host table.
00:57:58
>> Oh.
00:57:58
>> So, there will be points up for grabs. I
00:58:01
will say a product and we're going to
00:58:03
tell you three specs from that product.
00:58:06
One of them will be completely made up.
00:58:09
>> Two truths, one lie about all of these
00:58:11
products. You guys need to agree on
00:58:14
which one you think it is.
00:58:15
>> Okay. And then if we fooled you, we get
00:58:17
the point. If you get it right, you get
00:58:19
the point.
00:58:20
>> Okay.
00:58:20
>> All right.
00:58:20
>> Real products.
00:58:21
>> Yeah, real products.
00:58:22
>> All right.
00:58:23
>> Let's start easy.
00:58:23
>> All right.
00:58:24
>> Pixel 10 Pro.
00:58:25
>> Yep.
00:58:26
>> The first spec.
00:58:27
>> Mhm.
00:58:27
>> It comes in two screen sizes. The Pro,
00:58:29
which is 6.3 in, and the Pro XL, which
00:58:32
is 6.7 in. Second spec.
00:58:34
>> Yep.
00:58:34
>> 7 years of software updates.
00:58:36
>> Mhm.
00:58:37
>> The third spec comes with a year of
00:58:39
Google AI Pro, a $239 value.
00:58:44
I'm like trying every single thing.
00:58:46
>> The seven years is of uh security
00:58:48
updates and pixel drops, not fullon
00:58:51
software updates. Are there
00:58:52
technicalities like this?
00:58:53
>> There have to be.
00:58:54
>> There are, but I'm pulling this straight
00:58:56
from their website.
00:58:58
>> And you said seven
00:59:00
>> seven years of software updates.
00:59:01
>> I think that's a lie.
00:59:02
>> That's my guess because it's security
00:59:04
updates, not
00:59:05
>> Yeah. And and pixel drops. I think it's
00:59:07
the lie because in seven years uh AI
00:59:10
will have destroyed humanity so they
00:59:11
won't be able seven years of new
00:59:13
features and updates if that changes it.
00:59:15
>> It does.
00:59:18
>> Okay.
00:59:19
>> Okay. So
00:59:20
>> 6.3 and 6.7 does that sound right for
00:59:23
>> 6.3 6.7? Yes, that sounds right. 10 Pro
00:59:27
10 Pro XL. Yep.
00:59:28
>> And then
00:59:29
>> or did they change the screen size by
00:59:31
0.1 or was that Apple? I have the Pro on
00:59:33
my desk. I'm fair Oh, no. I think that's
00:59:35
right. I think that's right. 6.3.
00:59:37
>> So maybe it doesn't come with Google AI
00:59:39
Pro for a year.
00:59:41
>> I thought it did.
00:59:41
>> Or maybe it wasn't a $230.
00:59:43
>> Oh, it doesn't come with Ultra.
00:59:44
>> No.
00:59:44
>> No, it doesn't. That's crazy.
00:59:47
>> That's the $200 one.
00:59:48
>> Pro is $20 a month.
00:59:49
>> Do you want me to reread that?
00:59:50
>> Sounds like something that would come.
00:59:51
>> Let's hear it one more time, Adam.
00:59:53
>> Two screen sizes. The Pro 6.3 in and the
00:59:56
Pro XL 6.7 in. Seven years of new
00:59:58
features and updates or comes with a
01:00:02
year of Google AI Pro, a $239 value.
01:00:06
>> Is it not a $239 value?
01:00:09
>> This is the easy one.
01:00:11
>> This is the easy one because it's like a
01:00:13
very modern device. It's like things off
01:00:15
their website, you know.
01:00:16
>> C.
01:00:16
>> I think it's C. Yeah.
01:00:18
>> All right. Part of me thinks he's
01:00:20
throwing one screen size off.
01:00:23
>> Go see. I'll go see.
01:00:25
Let's go. C is the last C is the last.
01:00:28
>> Wrong. We get the point.
01:00:29
>> What?
01:00:30
>> The size.
01:00:30
>> The Pro XL was 6.8 in.
01:00:32
>> I knew they changed it by 6.9.
01:00:35
>> 6.8.
01:00:36
>> I knew they changed it by 0.1 in.
01:00:39
>> Okay, you got us.
01:00:41
>> Yay.
01:00:42
>> Damn it.
01:00:43
>> We're losing this game.
01:00:45
>> Also, can I just say uh I love that we b
01:00:48
well not we, but the Royal Wii bullied
01:00:50
these Google into seven years of
01:00:52
software updates. We slowly we slowly
01:00:55
bullied these companies into actually
01:00:57
providing seven years is a long time. I
01:00:59
mean, didn't the iPhone what iPhone just
01:01:01
got an update after like 10 years
01:01:02
recently? There was some headline. It
01:01:04
was just some security update.
01:01:05
>> Oh, it was like a security. Yeah.
01:01:06
>> It was like a four, wasn't it?
01:01:09
>> But very few companies update things for
01:01:11
seven years. That's a long time.
01:01:12
>> They usually forget it exists after one
01:01:14
year.
01:01:14
>> Yeah. You know, Marquez, I'm really glad
01:01:15
you brought that up because the next
01:01:18
product
01:01:19
>> on our list, arguably the greatest
01:01:21
consumer product ever released by any
01:01:23
company ever.
01:01:25
>> I know a lot about the human AI pin for
01:01:27
sure.
01:01:27
>> Better than the human AI pen.
01:01:28
>> Oh,
01:01:29
>> more benefit to society than penicellin.
01:01:34
>> The iPhone 12 mini.
01:01:37
>> The wheel.
01:01:38
>> Are you guys way more than the wheel?
01:01:40
Way more than fire.
01:01:42
>> Dude, I'm too hot.
01:01:44
Anyway,
01:01:45
>> he's that
01:01:45
>> guys. iPhone 12 mini
01:01:48
>> a the iPhone 12 mini has a screen to
01:01:51
body ratio greater than 85%. The iPhone
01:01:56
12 mini is the oldest iPhone still fully
01:01:59
compatible with iOS 26. Fully
01:02:02
compatible. I'm not talking about
01:02:03
security patches. I'm talking about iOS
01:02:06
26.
01:02:07
>> That's right. I think the 11 is
01:02:09
>> the iPhone 12 mini was part of the first
01:02:12
series of iPhones to have ceramic
01:02:14
shield.
01:02:14
>> I think the 11 is the the 11 is the 26
01:02:18
one.
01:02:20
>> I swear Ellis said something about his
01:02:22
phone being the last.
01:02:24
>> It was one of the ones that had ceramic
01:02:25
shield cuz the 12 the 12 is what added
01:02:28
ceramic shield. I do remember the I feel
01:02:30
like I remember 12 being ceramic shield.
01:02:32
>> It was. Yeah.
01:02:32
>> And then what what was the first thing
01:02:33
again? The iPhone 12 mini has a screen
01:02:35
to body ratio greater than 85%.
01:02:38
>> It's probably like 86.
01:02:40
>> I kind of think it's like just under.
01:02:41
>> I think it has under 85%
01:02:43
>> cuz I think the notch in a phone that
01:02:45
small
01:02:46
>> Yeah.
01:02:46
>> and it's bezels.
01:02:48
>> If we're thinking about OG like screen
01:02:50
to body ratios, we're like 88.
01:02:52
>> I need I need I need one solid answer.
01:02:54
>> It's a Well, I got outvoted.
01:02:55
>> So, the screen to body ratio is the lie.
01:02:58
>> Yes. Got outvoted,
01:03:00
>> guys. What? The screen to body ratio of
01:03:01
the iPhone 12 mini is 85.1%.
01:03:05
Making it higher than 85%. You want to
01:03:08
know something even more infuriating?
01:03:09
>> It's the 11.
01:03:10
>> It's the 11, baby.
01:03:11
>> Guys,
01:03:13
>> when will you learn to listen to me?
01:03:15
>> The one before I said I think it's the
01:03:17
screen size and you told me no.
01:03:18
>> Yeah, I didn't know about that.
01:03:20
>> I know about this one.
01:03:22
>> So, the iPhone 11 is the one that's
01:03:24
fully supported.
01:03:25
>> iPhone 11 is the oldest phone. Fully
01:03:27
supported. I IO.
01:03:28
>> You did call that immediately. Good.
01:03:30
>> Wow.
01:03:30
>> Immediately. You guys ready for number
01:03:32
three?
01:03:32
>> Any hesitation?
01:03:33
>> Well, David got his one right, so he
01:03:34
can't get any other right so far. So,
01:03:37
>> go get any hesitation.
01:03:38
>> We're losing, guys. We're down.
01:03:40
>> All right. All right. Oculus Rift S.
01:03:42
>> Okay.
01:03:43
>> It was made by Oculus VR and Lenovo.
01:03:47
>> Used an OLED panel with an 80 Hz refresh
01:03:50
rate.
01:03:52
>> Featured software only IPD adjustment.
01:03:55
IPD meaning interpupilary distance.
01:03:58
>> That sounds insane. Um,
01:03:59
>> how do you do that?
01:04:00
>> It's 90 Hz.
01:04:02
>> Wait, can you say the three things
01:04:04
again? Because I didn't I thought you
01:04:06
were still explaining the Oculus Rift. I
01:04:08
didn't know you were doing the thing.
01:04:09
>> Partnered made in partnership with
01:04:10
Lenovo.
01:04:11
>> Okay.
01:04:12
>> Uses an OLED panel that has an 80 Hz
01:04:14
refresh rate.
01:04:15
>> No, it's got to be 90.
01:04:16
>> Featured uh software. Oh. Had software
01:04:20
only IPD interupary distance.
01:04:21
>> I'm pretty sure Valve put out like a
01:04:23
paper that said for people to not get
01:04:26
sick, it has to be 90 or higher. That
01:04:28
sounds
01:04:30
>> I think a lot of these companies focused
01:04:31
on 90 Hz.
01:04:32
>> I want to believe David again.
01:04:35
>> I've also seen some weird refresh rates
01:04:37
on VR headsets.
01:04:39
>> Yeah,
01:04:40
>> like 48.
01:04:43
>> Really?
01:04:43
>> And 96.
01:04:44
>> 48. Maybe not 48. That sounds too low.
01:04:47
>> That sounds too low.
01:04:48
>> But let's go with that. I got to say
01:04:50
this one for stipulation. I'm not as
01:04:53
sure.
01:04:53
>> Nope. Nope. cuz I've never seen software
01:04:57
only IPD ever. I've never heard of that.
01:04:59
>> You mean fiated rendering?
01:05:01
>> No. When like the when you first set up
01:05:02
a headset and you hear the motors move
01:05:04
the lenses to match your eyes. I've
01:05:06
never heard of software only IPD. I mean
01:05:08
I've it's possible that the Rift is the
01:05:10
cheapest one in
01:05:11
>> but this is the Rift.
01:05:12
>> This is like
01:05:13
>> this is the crazy one.
01:05:14
>> The Rift S,
01:05:15
>> which was I believe the last one before
01:05:17
I had
01:05:19
>> A was made by Lenovo.
01:05:21
>> A was made by Oculus VR and Lenovo. Did
01:05:23
Lenovo make this? I don't know that one
01:05:25
at all. I don't know.
01:05:27
>> Lenovo could be behind a thousand
01:05:29
products and I would never know about
01:05:30
it.
01:05:31
>> We have no clue.
01:05:31
>> Behind every great product is even
01:05:34
greater.
01:05:34
>> There's somewhere in that product is the
01:05:36
little red mouse button.
01:05:38
>> You see, is it still a Valve paper? They
01:05:40
probably wouldn't ship their own under
01:05:42
90 Hz.
01:05:43
>> No, but Valve Yeah, but that's the but
01:05:45
that's the val that's Valve. That's not
01:05:47
Lenovo/
01:05:49
Oculus.
01:05:49
>> Oculus. like Oculus might have.
01:05:52
>> I feel like Lenovo did not make the
01:05:53
Oculus S.
01:05:54
>> Yeah, I go that. I don't see them in
01:05:58
that space at all.
01:06:00
>> I need Yeah, I'll confirm. I'll go with
01:06:04
that. But
01:06:04
>> yeah, I think it's because they they did
01:06:06
make the Windows VR headset, the Lenovo
01:06:08
Windows VR headset, but that was not
01:06:10
Oculus S.
01:06:12
>> So, I'd say but it means they've been in
01:06:13
that space before.
01:06:16
>> This is a shot in the dark.
01:06:17
>> Shot in the dark Lenovo. Yeah,
01:06:18
>> Lenovo is a lie.
01:06:20
>> Oh my god.
01:06:21
>> Wow, you guys are doing great.
01:06:23
>> Oh my god.
01:06:24
>> It was an LCD panel, not an OLED panel.
01:06:27
>> That was the guy.
01:06:28
>> He said OLED.
01:06:29
>> Should have heard OLED cuz that feels
01:06:31
really obvious now that I
01:06:33
>> didn't even
01:06:33
>> You guys were going so hard on
01:06:35
everything else. I was like, they missed
01:06:36
the most obvious.
01:06:36
>> What number was that?
01:06:37
>> That was B. Number two. Used an OLED
01:06:39
panel with an 80 Hz refresh rate.
01:06:41
>> And I knew throwing the hertz in there
01:06:43
would really get you guys. When I was in
01:06:44
Philly on Monday,
01:06:47
I was like locked in. When I was When I
01:06:50
was in Philly on Monday, I went to a um
01:06:52
this museum type thing where everything
01:06:54
is a mosaic. And there's like a uh
01:06:56
there's like a thing where you have to
01:06:58
find specific things in the mosaic. And
01:07:01
it's this felt like one of those things
01:07:03
where you're staring directly at it, but
01:07:05
you just didn't see the one thing that
01:07:07
it asked for. And I just didn't even
01:07:09
hear you guys say OLED. So, I wasn't
01:07:10
even thinking about it. I was thinking
01:07:12
about everything around it. Yeah.
01:07:14
>> Okay. This This one This one should be
01:07:16
way easier, I think.
01:07:16
>> Okay. I'm I'm locked in.
01:07:17
>> Lock in. Lock in. Lock in. Lock in.
01:07:19
>> Locked in.
01:07:19
>> There's a three-pointer.
01:07:20
>> This category. This one's
01:07:22
>> This one's You know how confident I am?
01:07:26
Like a This is an eight pointer. Let's
01:07:27
do it.
01:07:29
>> Ready?
01:07:30
>> All right.
01:07:32
>> There is a cucumber emoji.
01:07:35
>> No, there's
01:07:36
>> There is an orca emoji.
01:07:37
>> There is. Seen it.
01:07:38
>> There is.
01:07:39
>> There is a barbecue emoji.
01:07:40
>> There's no cucumber.
01:07:41
>> Barbecue. like a barbecue like the
01:07:44
stand. I've seen that too. It's There is
01:07:46
no cucumber.
01:07:46
>> It's the cucumber.
01:07:47
>> Cucumber. Final answer.
01:07:48
>> Cucumber.
01:07:49
>> Cucumber.
01:07:49
>> Final answer.
01:07:50
>> Final answer.
01:07:52
>> Is it the barbecue?
01:07:54
>> Yeah, there's there's no barbecue
01:07:55
because I don't remember a barbecue.
01:07:56
>> It's probably because Slack might have
01:07:57
its own barbecue emoji.
01:07:59
>> Yeah. Also, that was sort of a trick
01:08:00
question cuz the Orca is not in iOS yet,
01:08:03
but it is in Unicode.
01:08:06
>> What?
01:08:06
>> Yeah. They just haven't added it to the
01:08:08
Apple Apple keyboard yet.
01:08:09
>> But you didn't say Apple. I didn't.
01:08:11
Which is why there Oh my god, there's a
01:08:12
cucumber. There is a That's why there's
01:08:15
just if you search Orca emoji on your
01:08:17
iPhone, it will not come up.
01:08:18
>> I can't believe there's a cucumber and a
01:08:20
pickle. Oh my god, there is a cucumber.
01:08:21
>> Wait, there's a cucumber and pickle.
01:08:22
>> The pickle is also not I actually think
01:08:24
the pickle is going to be
01:08:25
>> I don't see a pickle.
01:08:26
>> It's the same as a cucumber.
01:08:28
>> No, no, no, no, no. I have the answer to
01:08:29
this. The pickle is So, right now we're
01:08:32
the most recent like confirmed approved
01:08:34
in Unicode emoji is 17. That's not in
01:08:38
iOS.
01:08:39
18 is going to get confirmed I think in
01:08:42
the coming weeks. And there is a pickle
01:08:44
I believe in emoji 18.
01:08:45
>> What's the difference?
01:08:48
>> Literally pickled.
01:08:49
>> I want to see like how they make the
01:08:50
visual difference between that.
01:08:53
>> Next, Android Honeycomb.
01:08:56
>> Mhm.
01:08:56
>> This is on you.
01:08:57
>> Famous for its hollow user interface.
01:09:00
>> Yep.
01:09:01
>> Debuted on the Samsung Galaxy Nexus.
01:09:04
>> No.
01:09:05
>> Introduced recent apps for multitasking.
01:09:08
>> Yeah. Which one is
01:09:09
>> honeycomb is five,
01:09:11
>> I believe.
01:09:12
>> And it debuted on the zoom on the t
01:09:14
Yeah, the zoom tablet. Motorola Zoom.
01:09:16
>> Yeah. So,
01:09:17
>> agree.
01:09:18
>> Yeah.
01:09:18
>> Unless it's wrong.
01:09:19
>> Are you locking it in?
01:09:20
>> Honeycom is a tablet UI only. So, it did
01:09:22
not debut on the Galaxy.
01:09:24
>> Four tablets. It had to be. Yeah.
01:09:25
>> The Samsung Galaxy Nexus.
01:09:27
>> It was hollow on
01:09:28
>> the Galaxy Nexus is a phone.
01:09:29
>> Mhm.
01:09:30
>> Yeah. It was ice cream sandwich on the
01:09:31
Nexus 4.0 and then uh five was
01:09:35
>> But just to be sure, can you reread
01:09:38
The question and the possible answers.
01:09:40
>> The question is, Android Honeycomb. Here
01:09:44
are the three things about it. One,
01:09:46
famous for its hollow user interface.
01:09:49
Two, debuted on the Samsung Galaxy
01:09:52
Nexus. Three, introduced recent apps for
01:09:55
multitasking.
01:09:57
>> It didn't debut on the Nexus.
01:09:58
>> Honeycomb. Honeycomb.
01:10:02
Eclair Freyo. Gingerbread.
01:10:04
Honeycomb ice cream sandwich
01:10:07
>> ice cream sandwich was 4.0 right
01:10:12
on the
01:10:15
>> I'm fairly sure that honeycomb was
01:10:18
famous for hollow. It was for tablets
01:10:20
and it debuted on my Motorola Zoom and
01:10:22
it later showed up on the Asus
01:10:23
Transformer tablet. So I'm going with
01:10:26
>> Yeah.
01:10:26
>> the debuted on a Nexus.
01:10:28
>> That's correct.
01:10:29
>> Correct. Finally, they're on the board
01:10:31
with one.
01:10:32
>> We're goss.
01:10:33
>> That was a layup. Gosh.
01:10:34
>> All right, let's do let's hit him with
01:10:36
another Marquez. I guess that was that
01:10:38
all of you guys knew that. But this
01:10:39
one's really the Marquez special, but
01:10:41
you should all also know it except maybe
01:10:44
>> Andrew
01:10:46
off.
01:10:46
>> Well, no, it's not. It's cuz you use the
01:10:48
other one sometimes
01:10:50
>> cuz this product is
01:10:52
>> I wish I had a drum roll. I guess that's
01:10:54
the next button I got to put. Um, Final
01:10:57
Cut Pro was originally called Keygrip
01:11:00
and developed by a company called
01:11:02
Macromedia. Final Cut Pro was acquired
01:11:05
by Apple in 2001. And Marquez, this one
01:11:09
is just for you. You can temporarily
01:11:11
disable Final Cut Pro's signature
01:11:13
feature, the magnetic timeline, by
01:11:17
holding down the TY key. He's never done
01:11:19
that before.
01:11:20
>> I know he does it in a different crazy
01:11:23
way.
01:11:23
>> You can do that. You
01:11:26
Okay, we're here.
01:11:26
>> I could be lying.
01:11:27
>> Allegedly.
01:11:28
>> So,
01:11:30
>> so when I was in high school, I was
01:11:31
using Final Cut
01:11:34
>> six, I believe.
01:11:35
>> Seven, probably.
01:11:36
>> And that was 1864, right? Yeah. I used
01:11:39
>> It may have made it seven by my senior
01:11:41
year. My senior year in high school is
01:11:43
2008.
01:11:44
>> So, if 2001
01:11:46
was when it got acquired, that would
01:11:49
presumably be Final Cut one. Mhm.
01:11:52
>> And then so the timing kind of
01:11:55
>> like
01:11:55
>> matches up right then.
01:11:56
>> So if we're facteing the 2001 part
01:11:58
because I remember Apple acquired it. I
01:12:00
remember it was Keygrip before.
01:12:01
>> Okay.
01:12:01
>> I don't remember the name of the company
01:12:03
that developed it, which if that's the
01:12:05
gotcha, then I'm not going to get it.
01:12:06
But it was Keygrip and it was acquired
01:12:08
by Apple. And if so, if 2001 makes
01:12:10
sense, then the things that we're
01:12:12
facteing are the tilda or the name of
01:12:16
the company that owned it before Apple.
01:12:18
>> 2001. The 2001 could be like a year off.
01:12:21
>> I'll make it a little more interesting.
01:12:24
>> It's not the name of the company is not
01:12:25
the gotcha here. I'm not saying whether
01:12:27
it was actually called Keygrip or not,
01:12:29
but we're not we're not double double
01:12:31
tricking you on that.
01:12:32
>> I was using Final Cut 7 in 2006 through
01:12:35
2008. I know that for sure.
01:12:37
>> Okay. So, but that was already owned by
01:12:40
Apple by then.
01:12:41
>> Yeah.
01:12:42
>> Yeah, it was
01:12:43
>> Yeah. Final Cut Pro. I didn't
01:12:45
>> actually I don't know if it was owned by
01:12:46
Apple by then.
01:12:48
I think I just used it on a Mac.
01:12:49
>> It was pretty It was pretty much like
01:12:51
the Apple thing. It was actually one of
01:12:54
its most popular versions was seven.
01:12:56
>> Yeah.
01:12:57
>> Uh
01:12:58
>> so is the gotcha there potentially?
01:13:00
>> So keygrip turned it into Final Cut
01:13:02
before Apple acquired it or
01:13:04
>> Oh no.
01:13:05
>> Is that what you guys are saying? Cuz I
01:13:07
just assumed when Apple acquired it
01:13:08
that's when it became Final Cut.
01:13:09
>> Yeah, Apple.
01:13:10
>> But I don't know the lore there.
01:13:12
>> So did Apple acquire Final Cut or did
01:13:13
they acquire Keygrip?
01:13:15
That's not the gotcha either.
01:13:17
>> Okay.
01:13:18
>> So, the gotcha is either the tilda or
01:13:19
>> I think it's the tilda to screw with
01:13:21
you.
01:13:21
>> There's no there's no there's no it's
01:13:23
just one of them is just a line.
01:13:25
>> Could be the tilda.
01:13:26
>> The tilda.
01:13:26
>> I think they're trying to
01:13:27
>> Maybe you can hold down another key.
01:13:29
>> Yeah, I think it's the tilda. I don't
01:13:30
think you can disable magnetic timeline.
01:13:32
I think you can disable magnetism of
01:13:34
clips like your your play head with the
01:13:37
tilda. Or maybe not the tilda, but you
01:13:39
can disable and enable magnetic uh
01:13:42
snapping.
01:13:43
>> Oh, yeah. but not the whole magnetic
01:13:44
timeline.
01:13:45
>> I think it is snapping.
01:13:46
>> So, I'm going to go with I'm going to go
01:13:47
with C is the actual Yos.
01:13:51
I think it's snapping.
01:13:52
>> What do you mean?
01:13:54
>> What in like the magnetic snapping?
01:13:56
>> You can disable magnetic snapping, but
01:13:57
>> So, the magnetic timeline is when you're
01:14:00
dropping clips onto the timeline itself
01:14:01
and when you shorten a clip, every
01:14:03
single clip after it moves with it. If
01:14:06
you don't use that and you you stack
01:14:08
above and below the magnetic timeline,
01:14:10
you can still snap clips together
01:14:13
instead of having to get to the exact
01:14:14
key frame because of the magnetic
01:14:17
feature.
01:14:18
>> Okay.
01:14:18
>> Of the playhead.
01:14:19
>> I get it. I get it. This one I just have
01:14:21
to think.
01:14:22
>> So,
01:14:22
>> we were right.
01:14:23
>> You're not right. But the thing is is
01:14:25
like because it's kind of like
01:14:27
accidentally right because
01:14:28
>> the best kind.
01:14:29
>> So, the the the tilt just lets you move
01:14:32
clips everywhere. They don't they don't
01:14:34
magnetize to stuff.
01:14:36
>> I don't know if when you're moving stuff
01:14:37
with the ty the tilda key if other stuff
01:14:39
still snaps to it. If you just want
01:14:42
other stuff to not if you just want
01:14:45
other clips to not respond magnetically,
01:14:47
you use the P key which switches to the
01:14:49
position tool. So now I'm like you're
01:14:52
wrong, but like you may have
01:14:53
accidentally like stumbled on a right
01:14:55
answer because I wasn't like specific
01:14:57
enough, you know,
01:14:58
>> which deals in line with OLED versus
01:15:00
LCD. Is keygrip also a lie? No, I'll
01:15:03
give you that one just because No, Key
01:15:04
Rip is is true and it we lied about the
01:15:06
year it was acquired.
01:15:07
>> Okay.
01:15:08
>> I feel like I should give you that point
01:15:09
just because you did get me on the
01:15:11
specifics.
01:15:12
>> Yeah.
01:15:12
>> Final Cut 7 was released in 2009 or so.
01:15:16
>> I Well, you got to cut the part where I
01:15:17
said I was using in 2006.
01:15:19
>> Wait, what the was I using then?
01:15:21
>> Six.
01:15:22
>> They look exactly the same. Six and
01:15:24
seven
01:15:25
were exactly the same
01:15:26
>> in 2006.
01:15:27
>> They were just
01:15:29
Who knows? Speaking of sevens, the
01:15:31
iPhone 7. Okay. iPhone 7. Yep.
01:15:34
>> Comes in rose gold, gold, silver, black,
01:15:38
jet black, and product red.
01:15:40
>> Mhm.
01:15:41
>> Has a 32, 64, and 128 GB capacity.
01:15:45
>> That's the lie. That's the lie. Featured
01:15:47
the A10 Fusion chip.
01:15:49
>> It's There's no It Sorry, there's no
01:15:52
128,
01:15:53
>> right?
01:15:54
>> 3264.
01:15:55
>> Can you say it? But I like David's
01:15:57
conviction.
01:15:58
the confidence to the level of
01:16:00
interruption there.
01:16:02
>> Sorry.
01:16:02
>> No, no, no, no, no, no. I like inter if
01:16:05
you interrupt him. I'm team David here.
01:16:07
We're like, that's how I know.
01:16:08
>> I'm interrupting. So, the first one
01:16:11
>> comes in rose gold, gold, silver, black.
01:16:14
>> Can I interrupt? I don't know what we're
01:16:16
talking about.
01:16:16
>> iPhone 7.
01:16:17
>> iPhone.
01:16:17
>> iPhone 7.
01:16:18
>> All the colors were okay.
01:16:20
>> Rose gold, gold, silver, black, jet
01:16:24
black, and product red. Number two, has
01:16:27
a 32, 64, or 128 GB capacity.
01:16:31
>> And number three, featured the A10
01:16:34
Fusion chip.
01:16:34
>> Okay, I remember the jet black iPhone.
01:16:36
Wasn't that the
01:16:37
>> No, there. No, I agree. But he said rose
01:16:38
gold and gold.
01:16:40
>> Yeah, painted.
01:16:41
>> No, he was saying Oh,
01:16:42
>> he said it came in rose gold and gold. I
01:16:44
thought it just came in one of those.
01:16:46
>> I'm just trying to remember.
01:16:46
>> And then it came in black and gold.
01:16:47
>> They never had a truly gold.
01:16:49
>> The phone that had a jet black didn't
01:16:51
also have a black though, right?
01:16:52
>> No, I thought it did.
01:16:54
>> Really? I thought it it wasn't only one
01:16:56
of them, the like seven plus. I think
01:16:59
seven was right with the jet black
01:17:00
because that thing that was right when I
01:17:02
started working.
01:17:03
>> That wasn't the eight.
01:17:04
>> No, cuz the eight came out with the 10.
01:17:06
>> We haven't even started discussing the
01:17:07
fusion chip though. We haven't even
01:17:09
started discussing
01:17:10
>> or we feel like it's the seven that had
01:17:13
gold, rose gold, black, and jet black.
01:17:16
>> I don't think there was gold and rose
01:17:18
gold. Has Apple ever released a purely
01:17:20
gold phone? I don't think so.
01:17:22
>> Yeah.
01:17:23
>> What? What
01:17:24
>> was there like a 5S that was gold?
01:17:25
There's like silver and a gold version.
01:17:27
>> Yeah.
01:17:27
>> I thought they've always been rose gold.
01:17:29
>> That might have been rose gold.
01:17:30
>> Silver and gold. Silver.
01:17:32
>> I don't know why I'm nodding and
01:17:33
shaking.
01:17:33
>> Yeah, I don't either. I don't know if
01:17:34
you're
01:17:34
>> I think it was rose gold cuz it was like
01:17:36
pink.
01:17:37
>> Rose gold's pink, right?
01:17:38
>> Yeah.
01:17:38
>> They never had a phone that had also
01:17:40
gold
01:17:40
>> was
01:17:41
>> I don't know.
01:17:41
>> Eight. The rose gold that just looked
01:17:43
like a band-aid.
01:17:45
>> That cuz that was glass back, right?
01:17:47
>> Yeah. Eight was glass back.
01:17:49
>> Seven.
01:17:50
>> What color?
01:17:51
>> Well, I guess. Wait, wait. It was seven
01:17:53
glass back or metal back?
01:17:55
>> Seven. Uh,
01:17:56
>> it was glass, right?
01:17:58
>> Yeah, cuz the eight was the first
01:17:59
wireless char. Yeah, first wireless
01:18:01
charging iPhone was the eight.
01:18:03
>> So then seven was
01:18:04
>> seven had a jet black glossy version,
01:18:08
but it didn't uh wireless charge. I
01:18:10
remember that phone. It was like super
01:18:11
It fingerprints. It had like scratches
01:18:14
super easily. Single camera,
01:18:16
>> but I don't think it had wireless
01:18:17
charging. But it was the one that was
01:18:18
like polished. No, they added wireless
01:18:20
charging on the 11 eight.
01:18:23
>> No, the 12. Oh, wireless charging.
01:18:25
>> Wireless charging.
01:18:26
>> Eight. Mag Safe was 12.
01:18:28
>> Didn't 10 they had wireless charging.
01:18:30
>> Eight and 10 came out at the same time.
01:18:32
>> Yeah, eight and 10 at the same time.
01:18:33
Yeah.
01:18:37
>> What are they talking?
01:18:39
>> So, the Zoom, the iPhone 7, did it have
01:18:43
gold? Sounds like too many colors.
01:18:44
>> Rose gold?
01:18:45
>> I don't think it had gold.
01:18:46
>> Silver?
01:18:47
>> I think it's the color. Can I make a
01:18:48
clarification question? Yeah. When you
01:18:50
say seven, do you mean seven lineup or
01:18:52
just the seven? Are you counting seven
01:18:54
plus?
01:18:55
>> On Apple's website for documentation in
01:18:58
technical specifications, it just says
01:19:00
iPhone 7.
01:19:01
>> I don't think it came in gold and rose
01:19:02
gold. I don't remember an iPhone 7 in
01:19:05
regular gold color.
01:19:07
>> I'm like wondering if one of them came
01:19:09
in the seven and one came in the
01:19:10
>> aluminum. Aluminium
01:19:13
>> gold and rose. I can picture it with the
01:19:17
antenna bands, but maybe I'm just making
01:19:18
that up in my head.
01:19:20
>> No.
01:19:20
>> A10 fusion chip. Is that um
01:19:23
>> I don't think there's any way to know.
01:19:25
>> Well, we're on A10.
01:19:27
>> We're A10 in the iPhone 10.
01:19:29
>> We're on A8, right?
01:19:31
>> Wait, let's go backwards. A10 in the
01:19:33
iPhone 7 would mean A9 in the iPhone 6,
01:19:36
which would mean A8 in the iPhone 5. Or
01:19:38
wait, 6S.
01:19:40
>> Well, no, no, no, no, no. We should go
01:19:41
back from the top because we start.
01:19:43
We're on iOS 26 right now.
01:19:45
>> Shut up.
01:19:46
>> A
01:19:48
iPhone 17.
01:19:49
>> So it' be a 16 is a 17. 15 is 16. 14 is
01:19:55
13.
01:19:56
>> 12 is
01:19:58
>> No, no, no. 13 is 12.
01:20:00
>> iPhone 13
01:20:01
>> is 12
01:20:02
>> is A12.
01:20:03
>> Yo, for any young aspiring podcast
01:20:10
>> iPhone 12 is a 13.
01:20:11
>> Shut up. iPhone 12 is A3. iPhone 11 is a
01:20:16
12. iPhone 10
01:20:18
>> 10/8
01:20:20
is A1 A1. So it would be A10. Yeah.
01:20:24
>> A10 Fusion.
01:20:25
>> Okay. It lines up.
01:20:27
>> Yeah.
01:20:28
>> Okay.
01:20:28
>> Or did they not do the
01:20:29
>> I hope it's the gold thing cuz it said
01:20:31
it 14 minutes ago.
01:20:32
>> Let's go with the gold. Let's go with
01:20:33
the colors.
01:20:34
>> What about the fuse?
01:20:35
>> No.
01:20:36
>> David was right at the beginning. David
01:20:38
interrupted the question and was right.
01:20:40
>> There's no 128. Well, there's no 64, but
01:20:43
it was the storage thing.
01:20:44
>> The courage of my convictions, bro. We
01:20:46
got to go.
01:20:46
>> Wait, they had
01:20:47
>> So, they had a 32 and a 128,
01:20:50
>> and they had a gold and a rose gold and
01:20:52
a black and a jet black.
01:20:54
>> 32, 128, 256 were the storage options.
01:20:58
>> They just went from 32 to 128.
01:21:00
>> What's even funnier is at the top of the
01:21:02
page, they have the gold and the rose
01:21:04
gold right next to each other. So, you
01:21:05
guys are like, there's no way they never
01:21:06
did both gold and rose gold. We're just
01:21:08
like looking at these two. I forgot that
01:21:09
they used to do like 32 and then if you
01:21:12
if you pay the money you can get like a
01:21:13
real storage.
01:21:15
>> Wait, that gold one's kind of nice. Was
01:21:16
this the best lineup of colors
01:21:18
>> and it had the best camera?
01:21:19
>> Dude, this red.
01:21:20
>> Gold is really good. And that was a good
01:21:22
product red with the like metal.
01:21:24
>> Yeah, iPhone 7 was the best.
01:21:25
>> Jet black was overrated though. Damn, I
01:21:26
forgot they did black and jet black.
01:21:28
>> Jet black sucked. But black was good.
01:21:29
>> Black fire. Damn. Okay. Okay. Okay.
01:21:31
Okay,
01:21:31
>> guys. This one's not a trick. There's no
01:21:33
That saying that really makes it sound
01:21:35
like it's a trick. I was going to say
01:21:37
>> this one's just like straight up true or
01:21:39
lie. Ready?
01:21:41
>> This the the consumer product
01:21:44
>> for this one.
01:21:46
>> The pause means there's a trick
01:21:47
somewhere in here.
01:21:48
>> The trick is that it's not a consumer
01:21:50
product. It's facts about me. Ellis,
01:21:53
>> facts about
01:21:54
>> Are you ready? Fact number one.
01:21:56
>> Mhm.
01:21:57
>> I have owned two phones with full cordy
01:22:01
keyboards, physical cordy keyboards on
01:22:03
them. two phones over the course of my
01:22:06
entire life.
01:22:07
>> Okay.
01:22:08
>> Fact number two, I owned three iPhones
01:22:13
before the iPhone lost the home button.
01:22:15
Meaning I had three iPhones between one
01:22:18
and eight, right? Yeah.
01:22:21
>> Can Never mind.
01:22:22
>> Yeah. No, clarify. Hit it.
01:22:24
>> I feel like saying three is this exact
01:22:26
number. Is it like more than three or
01:22:28
less?
01:22:28
>> No. Exact number. If it's it's either
01:22:30
three or everything else.
01:22:33
>> Same thing with the two. And get it.
01:22:36
Last fact, I have only ever owned one
01:22:40
phone in my entire 12-year-old life that
01:22:44
had a T9 dialer keypad. And you know
01:22:46
what I mean when I say T9? I mean
01:22:49
>> 12 buttons arranged in a three column
01:22:52
four row grid.
01:22:53
>> Was it the LG Voyager?
01:22:55
I'm not I can't
01:22:57
>> the Voyager had a touch screen and No,
01:23:02
>> it wasn't.
01:23:03
>> So, one phone with a T9 keypad.
01:23:06
>> Mhm.
01:23:07
>> Three iPhones with home buttons.
01:23:10
>> Mhm.
01:23:10
>> Two phones with full cordy keyboards.
01:23:14
>> I
01:23:14
>> It's three iPhones.
01:23:15
>> I think it's I don't think he owned a
01:23:17
phone with a T9 keyboard.
01:23:19
>> I think he did.
01:23:20
>> I think that's the lie.
01:23:22
>> Oh, yeah. You're right. Do you remember
01:23:23
when he said he bought his first phone
01:23:25
and it was
01:23:26
>> it was a slider slider phone. It was
01:23:27
like a Yagasaki or whatever.
01:23:29
>> Yes. A T9 would be
01:23:31
>> what?
01:23:31
>> Like a Yamaha
01:23:34
Mitsubishi.
01:23:35
>> Matsubishi.
01:23:36
>> So if the first phone slider, then we're
01:23:38
going
01:23:39
>> I think we never owned a T knife.
01:23:41
>> Yeah, I think it was the slider only.
01:23:43
>> No, it was the Yamaha Kawasaki hybrid.
01:23:47
>> My first phone was Korean. It was a
01:23:49
Samsung. It was a Samsung.
01:23:51
>> Was it really? Yes.
01:23:53
>> Did it have T9?
01:23:54
>> Oh, no.
01:23:55
>> Andrew, you are correct. I never owned
01:23:58
>> I know nothing about tech and everything
01:23:59
about Ellis. That's
01:24:02
>> it's great as it should be.
01:24:03
>> That was a six-pointer.
01:24:05
>> Six pointer. So, we're Oh, we're we're
01:24:06
ahead.
01:24:06
>> I did not.
01:24:07
>> Did you say that?
01:24:08
>> No.
01:24:09
>> Working 9 to5.
01:24:11
>> So, score producers five hosts three.
01:24:14
Next question.
01:24:15
>> Okay.
01:24:16
>> Is about Microsoft.
01:24:18
Number one. The first Microsoft Store
01:24:20
was in Scottsdale, Arizona. Number two,
01:24:24
Bing is actually the rebrand of an older
01:24:27
Microsoft search engine called Live
01:24:29
Search. Or number three, while the Zoom
01:24:32
no longer lives, the music store where
01:24:34
you can get files for Zoom, Groove
01:24:35
Music, is still up and running.
01:24:38
Which one is it?
01:24:40
>> What?
01:24:41
>> One of these.
01:24:42
>> The
01:24:43
>> I feel like the first store was in um
01:24:46
Santa Clara. So, I I can picture like
01:24:48
the first ever Microsoft store uh and us
01:24:51
all going, "Oh, wow. It's a pretty glass
01:24:52
store." But I don't remember where that
01:24:54
was.
01:24:55
>> I would assume it's in Washington,
01:24:57
>> which is where the HQ is.
01:24:59
>> Yeah.
01:24:59
>> Yeah.
01:25:00
>> I think the other thing I'm thinking
01:25:01
about is I own a Zoom HD and never once
01:25:03
used whatever he said was the name of
01:25:05
the music store.
01:25:08
>> It would not be up and running still,
01:25:09
right?
01:25:10
>> No way.
01:25:10
>> Groove Music. I remember Groove Music. I
01:25:12
remember Groove.
01:25:13
>> That feels like the weird thing that
01:25:14
we're supposed to pick. I didn't use
01:25:16
Groove Music. I used the Zoom store and
01:25:18
bought I bought music from the Zoom
01:25:20
store. I never I don't think it was
01:25:21
called Groove Music.
01:25:23
>> I don't think
01:25:24
>> I would pick that.
01:25:25
>> I'm pretty sure there is a Groove Music.
01:25:27
>> What was it for?
01:25:29
>> Music.
01:25:30
>> But like for what?
01:25:31
>> I mean, so for PC or like what would you
01:25:34
why would you buy it?
01:25:35
>> I think it was
01:25:38
like an MP3 purchasing platform.
01:25:40
>> Well, because it was like old iTunes
01:25:41
where you used to buy your songs
01:25:43
individually. So, that makes sense. And
01:25:44
I could see it have potentially
01:25:46
pivoting.
01:25:48
>> I need I need to clarify one of the
01:25:49
things in this because a little more
01:25:51
nuance. The the first like Microsoft
01:25:54
store as we know Microsoft stores to
01:25:56
exist was in fact in Scottsdale,
01:25:57
Arizona. I can confirm that.
01:25:59
>> Um there was a like prototype Microsoft
01:26:02
store like like seven or eight years
01:26:05
before this opened that was operated by
01:26:08
like a Sony consumer retail division uh
01:26:11
in San Francisco. So it was there for
01:26:14
like a twoish years. So
01:26:17
>> technically there was a retail
01:26:19
experience called the Microsoft store.
01:26:22
However, what we now know as Microsoft's
01:26:24
Microsoft Store retail thing. Scott
01:26:28
Arizona is still factually correct
01:26:29
there.
01:26:30
>> So now you got a 5050 chance.
01:26:32
>> Yeah, we have a 50-50 chance.
01:26:33
>> I I Oh.
01:26:37
>> All right. Yeah.
01:26:38
>> So, probably like I don't think Groove
01:26:40
is still up and running unless they
01:26:41
pivoted to a streaming service, but I
01:26:43
doubt it because who would
01:26:45
>> I
01:26:45
>> I don't know where Bing came from.
01:26:46
>> I I feel like it has to be the
01:26:48
>> feels right.
01:26:50
>> The groove is the thing Adam wants us to
01:26:53
pick
01:26:54
>> because it feels so obviously not.
01:26:56
>> Does it help to say that I did not write
01:26:59
this question?
01:27:00
>> No. Um
01:27:03
calling something live feels really on
01:27:06
brand.
01:27:07
>> It does. which could be is it two on
01:27:09
brand called live
01:27:10
>> live translation.
01:27:11
>> Come on, it's right in front of you.
01:27:12
Come on, you got this. You got this.
01:27:13
>> I know it's there. I just
01:27:15
>> later tonight we'll play some Halo and
01:27:17
hop on.
01:27:18
>> Oh, Xbox Live.
01:27:19
>> Also, thank you.
01:27:21
>> Live translation and uh
01:27:24
>> I don't it Windows Live. Windows Live.
01:27:28
>> What's Windows?
01:27:29
>> What was the name of the search engine
01:27:30
you're saying?
01:27:31
>> Live search.
01:27:32
>> Live search.
01:27:33
>> Yeah,
01:27:34
>> that live search. It feels like
01:27:36
>> I can picture the blue in the logo.
01:27:39
>> Life search. I don't I know it's
01:27:43
Microsoft.
01:27:44
>> If I was making up a fake early
01:27:46
generation like internet search engine
01:27:49
name,
01:27:49
>> especially from
01:27:50
>> I would call it live search cuz I'm
01:27:52
searching the internet live.
01:27:54
>> It makes more sense to ask Jeeves, but
01:27:57
>> I know
01:27:57
>> we all remember that instead.
01:27:59
>> Bing. I don't remember a a time before
01:28:03
Bing. Maybe I'm too young.
01:28:04
>> Whoa. I really don't remember the great
01:28:07
LLM at this point.
01:28:08
>> Did you have a time base in there or did
01:28:10
you just say it was before Bing? Damn, I
01:28:11
can't remember pre-banging. There's like
01:28:13
BC.
01:28:15
>> PB PB and AB.
01:28:18
>> Yeah, I'm I'm exclusively a postb uh
01:28:21
type person.
01:28:22
>> We just live in the postb world.
01:28:24
>> So, I think I have to choose the the
01:28:25
Zoom one.
01:28:26
>> I'll go I'm somehow fight. I don't
01:28:29
believe either of them somehow or I do.
01:28:31
Yeah, I don't know.
01:28:32
>> I remember group music. I don't if
01:28:34
they're still operating. They pivoted.
01:28:36
>> So what? So let's go with that.
01:28:37
>> Yeah. What's the answer I need you guys
01:28:38
to
01:28:39
>> Well, they just said they're still
01:28:40
operating, right?
01:28:41
>> Yeah.
01:28:42
>> So it's probably the other one.
01:28:43
>> So you think it's the search? I'll go
01:28:45
with search.
01:28:46
>> I'm thinking search.
01:28:48
>> Okay, I'll go with that.
01:28:52
>> Guys, our group music is not operating
01:28:54
anymore.
01:28:56
>> You guys had a 50/50 chance. We gave you
01:28:58
that one.
01:28:59
>> Coin flip. You walked in too hard.
01:29:01
What's funny is if you didn't say the
01:29:02
other thing, I probably would have
01:29:03
argued that we should pick Scottsdale.
01:29:04
>> All right. Well, this next one you guys
01:29:06
need to get because two out of three of
01:29:08
you have lived in this state your entire
01:29:09
life. So,
01:29:10
>> oh boy. Okay,
01:29:11
>> guys. That's right. This final category,
01:29:14
this final consumer product is the great
01:29:17
state of New Jersey.
01:29:20
>> Well, I'm going to get this wrong.
01:29:23
>> The top half of New Jersey. First fact,
01:29:27
>> the first baseball game ever recorded as
01:29:31
being played was played in Hoboken, New
01:29:34
Jersey.
01:29:35
>> The first baseball game.
01:29:37
>> The first the first baseball game that
01:29:39
is like recorded and we have the score
01:29:40
and what happened.
01:29:42
>> It's so funny thinking of Hoboka now,
01:29:45
>> but like baseball has been around for a
01:29:48
very long time. So,
01:29:49
>> in true New Jersey sports fashion, both
01:29:52
of the teams were named for New York
01:29:54
City.
01:29:55
>> It was the New York Knicker Bachers
01:29:57
versus the New York Nine.
01:29:59
>> Second New Jersey fact.
01:30:02
>> New Jersey has a spoon museum in
01:30:05
Patterson. This spoon museum has over
01:30:08
5600
01:30:10
spoons.
01:30:11
>> I can see that
01:30:12
>> species of spoons.
01:30:14
>> Watch the technicality of 5,599. Third
01:30:18
New Jersey fact.
01:30:21
New Jerseyy's very own Atlantic City is
01:30:25
the basis for the property names in the
01:30:28
popular board game.
01:30:31
Yeah,
01:30:31
>> that's true.
01:30:32
>> Shoots and Les
01:30:36
Candy. You guys ever played Candy Land?
01:30:38
Like,
01:30:38
>> hell yeah, bro.
01:30:38
>> But you've never been to the gumdrop
01:30:40
forest in New Jersey.
01:30:42
>> The gumdrop where B is.
01:30:45
>> Okay. Um, the spoons one, I have no
01:30:47
idea. I've never heard of it, but it
01:30:49
wouldn't shock me. So, that's where I'm
01:30:51
at with that one. The Monopoly one, I
01:30:53
know that that is true and I believe
01:30:55
there's no gotchas in there. That sounds
01:30:56
correct.
01:30:57
>> Yeah.
01:30:57
>> So, the first one is the first ever
01:31:00
baseball game recorded was in Hoboken.
01:31:04
>> Was it called Hoboken at the time?
01:31:07
>> The first ever baseball game is so long
01:31:09
ago.
01:31:11
>> Yeah, so long ago. Hoboken was I mean
01:31:14
Hoboken. Okay. To be fair, Stevens was
01:31:16
founded in like the 1870s, but
01:31:18
baseball's older than that, right?
01:31:19
>> What came first, baseball or Hoboken?
01:31:21
>> What is How old is the first baseball
01:31:23
game?
01:31:23
>> Yeah. When did the Louisiana Purchase
01:31:25
happened?
01:31:25
>> Hold on. I'll be
01:31:26
>> The first The first baseball game ever
01:31:29
recorded.
01:31:31
>> What year could that be?
01:31:32
>> I'm getting it for you.
01:31:34
>> 1894.
01:31:36
>> BB before Bing
01:31:37
>> cuz I'm fairly sure
01:31:39
>> 46.
01:31:40
>> Damn. So Stevens was founded in Hoboken
01:31:42
in like 1876. So, I guess it's it's
01:31:44
possible that there was a Hoboken in
01:31:45
1840 something. Wow.
01:31:48
>> It's probably called like New York
01:31:50
extension at that point.
01:31:52
>> New York across the river.
01:31:54
>> New York. Oh, was that part of it that
01:31:56
they're called New York nines and New
01:31:58
York Nickerbuckers?
01:31:59
>> Probably.
01:32:00
>> I have no idea if that's probably
01:32:01
>> that wasn't part of the actual question.
01:32:03
That was just more context. The Hoboken
01:32:05
thing.
01:32:06
>> No, the New York teams the teams. I
01:32:10
can't believe you haven't commented on
01:32:12
anything that this was a technically a
01:32:13
Knicks game.
01:32:14
>> I know.
01:32:15
>> Yeah, Nicker Buckers was funny.
01:32:17
>> New Jersey Knicks.
01:32:18
>> They had Jaylen Brunson.
01:32:20
>> I don't know.
01:32:22
>> Patterson.
01:32:26
>> Might as well be the Spoon Museum. I
01:32:27
have no idea.
01:32:29
>> Spoon.
01:32:29
>> I know very little about
01:32:30
>> I bet it wasn't called Hoboken. That's
01:32:32
my guess.
01:32:33
>> I kind of think
01:32:34
>> Is it a fork museum instead? I I kind of
01:32:37
think the Spoon Museum
01:32:39
>> I think that's
01:32:40
>> I have no opinion. The Spoon Museum
01:32:42
seems like one that we would skip over
01:32:44
and just assume it's true. And I think
01:32:45
that's what makes it a good lie.
01:32:47
>> Can I suggest that maybe we make this
01:32:49
worth four points?
01:32:52
>> So either you win or you lose on this
01:32:55
answer.
01:32:55
>> All right. All right. That's fine.
01:32:56
>> Changes my confidence in this question.
01:32:58
>> We're going to just guess anyway.
01:33:00
>> All right. And your guess is
01:33:01
>> Spoon Museum. Spoon.
01:33:02
>> Spoon Museum is correct. Not just David.
01:33:06
was correct again. The spoon museum only
01:33:08
has 5,400 spoons, not the
01:33:11
affforementioned 5600.
01:33:13
>> Wait, so the lie is not that there's a
01:33:14
spoon museum.
01:33:15
>> No, there is a spoon museum in
01:33:16
Patterson. It just doesn't have quite as
01:33:18
many.
01:33:18
>> That's actually right. Oh my god.
01:33:20
>> I thought they said there was a fork
01:33:21
museum.
01:33:22
>> No, earlier in the episode I said I said
01:33:25
watch the technicality is going to be
01:33:26
that it has like 5599.
01:33:29
>> So they they have they say over 5,400.
01:33:32
So not not the over 5600. I said, which
01:33:34
means you guys with your four points
01:33:36
have taken it to seven points, meaning
01:33:39
you guys
01:33:40
>> Hey,
01:33:40
>> beat the hosts.
01:33:42
>> Can you play the Can you play the
01:33:44
extravaganza music?
01:33:45
>> David, I would take us to trivia.
01:33:47
However, I heard because you told me 30
01:33:49
seconds ago that we have
01:33:52
breaking news. Breaking news.
01:33:55
This is WFRM.
01:33:58
We're coming at you with some breaking
01:34:00
news here. Finally, we're not late on a
01:34:03
topic. We talked about Ring earlier and
01:34:05
how uh Ring is going to not use Flock
01:34:08
for its search party feature. It's kind
01:34:10
of not going forward with it. Um now
01:34:14
there is a new report from 404 media
01:34:15
that just dropped uh that has some
01:34:18
leaked emails from the CEO of Ring.
01:34:21
>> Whoops.
01:34:22
>> Where he says, "This is by far the most
01:34:25
innovation that we have ever launched in
01:34:26
the history of Ring. And it is not only
01:34:28
the quality but quantity. I believe that
01:34:31
the foundation we created with Search
01:34:34
Party, first for finding dogs, will end
01:34:36
up becoming one of the most important
01:34:37
pieces of tech and innovation to truly
01:34:40
unlock the impact of our mission. You
01:34:42
can now see a future where we are able
01:34:44
to zero out crime in neighborhoods. So
01:34:47
many things to do when we get there. But
01:34:49
for the first time ever, we have the
01:34:51
chance to fully complete compete
01:34:53
complete what we started.
01:34:55
>> That was the ring CEO, not the Palanteer
01:34:57
CEO.
01:34:57
>> Yeah, it was the ring CEO.
01:34:58
>> Oh, okay. So, you know, they're like
01:35:01
dogs only, dogs only, dogs only,
01:35:03
>> unless
01:35:03
>> unless
01:35:04
>> we we are so lucky, man. Like, ring guy
01:35:07
is going to like make crime zero. Sam
01:35:09
Alman is going to make cancer zero. Elon
01:35:12
is going to make poverty zero. Like,
01:35:14
these guys just are so good.
01:35:15
>> They're so good at making alive.
01:35:17
>> Thanks, boys.
01:35:19
>> You know, sometimes there's a little bit
01:35:22
too much skepticism, but I think that we
01:35:24
have the perfect amount at this moment.
01:35:27
>> Um,
01:35:27
>> well, you know what? You should have
01:35:28
more skepticism about
01:35:29
>> Yep.
01:35:31
>> my trivia questions because so often
01:35:33
they require
01:35:34
>> Oh my god, we haven't trivia yet.
01:35:36
>> No.
01:35:37
>> Mhm.
01:35:37
>> But we're about to do it now.
01:35:39
>> And then we're going to do another game
01:35:40
in the next episode.
01:35:42
>> Surprise.
01:35:45
>> We're playing games, boy. I got games,
01:35:47
boy.
01:35:48
>> Quick update on Marquez with 14.
01:35:51
>> Still.
01:35:52
>> Still.
01:35:52
>> And still.
01:35:53
>> David with 16.
01:35:55
>> Andrew with 17. Carrying the one.
01:35:57
>> Carrying the one.
01:35:58
>> How long have I had 17 for? I don't
01:36:00
think I have a point in the new year.
01:36:02
>> No, you have a point in the new year.
01:36:03
It's just
01:36:04
>> I don't have a point since Marquez
01:36:06
complained about not having a point in
01:36:07
the new year.
01:36:09
>> You think you haven't gotten a point in
01:36:10
like eight episodes?
01:36:12
>> Since whenever Marquez whined about it,
01:36:15
>> he cursed you.
01:36:16
>> He did curse me.
01:36:17
>> It's like you're the Philadelphia 76ers
01:36:20
and Marquez is Jared McCain getting
01:36:22
traded away.
01:36:24
>> Yeah. God bless Jared McCain. Anyway, we
01:36:26
spoke about the Pixel 10A, but the first
01:36:29
A series Pixel was the 3A. Which giant
01:36:31
manufacturer made it?
01:36:36
And I mean like the company that
01:36:39
actually manufactured it, not the one
01:36:41
that designed it, because we all know
01:36:43
Google designed it.
01:36:44
>> Oh,
01:36:45
>> there's your hint, Andrew.
01:36:49
>> BBK,
01:36:52
>> the great
01:36:52
>> Who's that?
01:36:53
>> Blues musician. I didn't think they I
01:36:55
didn't think they existed anymore.
01:36:58
>> Flip them and read. What do you got?
01:37:02
>> What' you say?
01:37:03
>> I hope I'm right.
01:37:04
>> Uh, I said HTC.
01:37:06
>> David, what' you say?
01:37:07
>> I said HTC.
01:37:08
>> It's right.
01:37:11
>> Wrong. Andrew, what' you say?
01:37:12
>> LG.
01:37:13
>> Also wrong. It was Foxcon.
01:37:17
>> Really?
01:37:18
>> Yeah. You guys looking it up before
01:37:19
confused you.
01:37:20
>> Well, that's a bummer.
01:37:21
>> I definitely thought you guys were going
01:37:22
to get that one. I was trying to throw
01:37:25
you a bone. Now you're stuck with
01:37:26
>> Foxcon. You thought Foxcon was throwing
01:37:28
us a bone.
01:37:29
>> They make most of the phones in the
01:37:31
world.
01:37:31
>> Yeah, they made every phone actually. I
01:37:34
thought they Okay. Well,
01:37:37
>> question number two, guys. Ring was not
01:37:41
always called Ring. Before they were
01:37:44
Ring, they were called
01:37:46
>> A. Doorbot,
01:37:50
B. Ham bell
01:37:53
C. Stoop watcher. Also, I should have
01:37:56
said stoop watcher does not have an E.
01:37:58
It's just Stoop Watcher
01:37:59
>> with an R.
01:38:00
>> Yeah, because this is like a real
01:38:01
>> Oh, that does sound really un
01:38:04
>> Yeah.
01:38:04
>> I mean, it depends where they were
01:38:05
headquartered.
01:38:07
>> Sesame Street.
01:38:11
>> Is that a real place?
01:38:12
>> Sesame Street.
01:38:13
>> Yeah.
01:38:13
>> Yeah. It's in Atlantic City with the
01:38:14
rest of the Monopoly properties.
01:38:17
Right next to the gumdrop floor. It's
01:38:19
right into the gumdrop for
01:38:21
>> it's in New York City.
01:38:27
>> You're at Taco Bell.
01:38:28
>> Just read
01:38:29
>> Campbell.
01:38:30
>> Who? Okay. What? What?
01:38:32
>> We all put something different.
01:38:33
>> No, Marcus and I put the same thing.
01:38:34
>> Yeah. Andrew and I put B. Campbell.
01:38:36
>> Campbell. Like the soup.
01:38:38
>> Yeah.
01:38:39
>> I wanted that to be right so bad.
01:38:42
>> I put C stoop watcher.
01:38:44
>> No, it was called doorbot.
01:38:46
>> My god,
01:38:47
>> you guys are on one. Dorba is a what?
01:38:50
Doorbot.
01:38:50
>> It's a horrible name.
01:38:52
>> This makes it easy for me cuz I don't
01:38:54
have to update the sword graphic. So,
01:38:55
>> it's the same graphic for like 6 weeks.
01:38:58
>> We thought it was called Camell.
01:39:00
>> Instant. That was
01:39:01
>> instant cease and desist.
01:39:03
>> You guys are getting good at when we ask
01:39:04
questions to like
01:39:06
>> answer the questions on the fake things
01:39:08
really believably.
01:39:10
>> Honestly, when Ellis said with an R, I
01:39:12
should have known it wasn't that one.
01:39:13
Well, we tried. Um, doorbot. I think
01:39:16
like most of this podcast was just Adam
01:39:18
and I not telling the truth
01:39:20
>> like
01:39:21
>> and us like floundering and Yeah, it's
01:39:24
but
01:39:25
>> yeah,
01:39:25
>> what makes it a bot?
01:39:26
>> I don't know. It just seems like a cool
01:39:28
thing to say.
01:39:31
>> But yeah, thanks for uh subscribing.
01:39:33
Thanks for hyping if you are still
01:39:36
hyping or able to. We appreciate that.
01:39:38
Uh thanks for liking and thanks for uh
01:39:40
rating us on whatever podcast app you
01:39:42
choose. We'll be back with you next week
01:39:44
in uh that'll be what? Samsung event
01:39:47
first. Yeah. See you see you soon after
01:39:50
the Samsung event and then the other
01:39:51
event and then the other event after
01:39:52
that where nothing new will be
01:39:53
announced.
01:39:54
>> No, something from nothing will be new
01:39:56
and
01:39:57
>> that's next next week.
01:39:58
>> Okay. So nothing new will be announced
01:40:01
from anyone.
01:40:03
>> New nothing is in two weeks. Nothing new
01:40:04
is next week.
01:40:06
>> Amazing. Thank you so much.
01:40:07
>> Yeah. Perfect.
01:40:08
>> Wait for produced by Adam and Elsen.
01:40:11
Why did that sound so weird?
01:40:12
>> Great sweetie.
01:40:12
>> Waveform is produced by Adam Molina and
01:40:14
Ellis and partnered with Vox Media
01:40:16
Podcast Network and Entra Music was
01:40:17
created by Vain Still.
01:40:18
>> Bingo.
01:40:32
This is all pure speculation. I'm not
01:40:35
holding any of them in my pockets right
01:40:37
now. By the way, these are facts. Are
01:40:38
you
01:40:39
>> These are facts.
01:40:40
So,

Episode Highlights

  • Tech Apologies
    A new segment called 'Did they even test this?' aims to address tech frustrations.
    “That's like my entire personality.”
    @ 02m 04s
    February 20, 2026
  • Pixel 10A Announcement
    Google announces the Pixel 10A, which is almost identical to the Pixel 9A, raising questions about innovation.
    “I went into this thinking it's the same phone.”
    @ 15m 12s
    February 20, 2026
  • The Dilemma of Incremental Updates
    Discussing the frustration with companies releasing phones that feel too similar to their predecessors.
    “Why even release this 10A?”
    @ 20m 47s
    February 20, 2026
  • Apple's Education Strategy
    Apple aims to compete with Chromebooks in education by offering affordable laptops.
    “Apple wants a piece of that pie.”
    @ 32m 41s
    February 20, 2026
  • The Future of MacBooks
    Rumors suggest a cheaper MacBook with an A series chip could be on the way.
    “This could be a winner.”
    @ 33m 08s
    February 20, 2026
  • Apple's Video Podcast Announcement
    Apple announced video podcasts, giving creators control over their content. "We are putting creators in full control of their content."
    “We are putting creators in full control of their content.”
    @ 48m 09s
    February 20, 2026
  • The Evolution of Podcasting
    Podcasting has transformed into a concept dominated by talk shows and advertising. "Everything's just a talk show now."
    “Everything's just a talk show now.”
    @ 53m 08s
    February 20, 2026
  • The iPhone 12 Mini's Features
    The iPhone 12 Mini boasts a screen-to-body ratio greater than 85%. "The screen to body ratio of the iPhone 12 mini is 85.1%."
    “The screen to body ratio of the iPhone 12 mini is 85.1%.”
    @ 01h 03m 01s
    February 20, 2026
  • Final Cut Pro's Origins
    Final Cut Pro was originally called Keygrip and developed by Macromedia before being acquired by Apple in 2001.
    “Final Cut Pro was originally called Keygrip.”
    @ 01h 11m 00s
    February 20, 2026
  • The Best iPhone Colors
    The discussion about the best iPhone colors leads to a nostalgic debate.
    “Dude, this red.”
    @ 01h 21m 19s
    February 20, 2026
  • Trivia Challenge
    The hosts engage in a trivia challenge, testing their knowledge on various topics.
    “That was a six-pointer.”
    @ 01h 24m 03s
    February 20, 2026
  • Doorbot's Origins
    Before Ring was called Ring, it was known as Doorbot. A name that didn’t stick!
    “Doorbot. It’s a horrible name.”
    @ 01h 38m 50s
    February 20, 2026

Episode Quotes

  • Internet is a monopoly.
    Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?
  • This isn’t even a spec bump.
    Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?
  • It’s hard to compare the Pro Display XDR because you’re looking at color calibrated things.
    Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?
  • We slowly bullied these companies into actually providing seven years of software updates.
    Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?
  • Shut up.
    Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?
  • Spoon Museum is correct.
    Why Bother with the Pixel 10a?

Key Moments

  • Xfinity Update06:29
  • Nothing Event46:24
  • Credit Given47:18
  • Podcasting's Shift53:03
  • Oculus Rift S1:03:40
  • Final Cut Pro1:11:00
  • iPhone Color Debate1:21:18
  • Upcoming Events1:39:44

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Productivity Apps and Apple Invites!
August 30, 2024
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:16:40
Productivity Apps and Apple Invites!
The iPhone 17 Rumor Roundup!
September 05, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:24:12
The iPhone 17 Rumor Roundup!
The Next iPhone Will Be…Orange?
August 01, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:13:22
The Next iPhone Will Be…Orange?
Gadget Season 2023 Has Officially Started!
September 01, 2023
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:06:38
Gadget Season 2023 Has Officially Started!
CES 2026 Actually Has Some Bangers?
January 09, 2026
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
02:34:45
CES 2026 Actually Has Some Bangers?
Samsung S24 Leaks and Our Favorite Tech of 2023!
January 05, 2024
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:40:21
Samsung S24 Leaks and Our Favorite Tech of 2023!
What Does the iPhone Event Invitation Mean?
August 29, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:31:36
What Does the iPhone Event Invitation Mean?
Samsung Galaxy Unpacked: No Peeking!
February 27, 2026
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:12:39
Samsung Galaxy Unpacked: No Peeking!
Live at SXSW 2026: Can They Convince Marques to Shoot 24fps?
March 17, 2026
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:05:21
Live at SXSW 2026: Can They Convince Marques to Shoot 24fps?
Do Earbuds Need a Touchscreen and Last Minute Apple Predictions
September 02, 2022
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
48:47
Do Earbuds Need a Touchscreen and Last Minute Apple Predictions
Samsung’s Tri-Fold Phone is Coming!
July 18, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:26:50
Samsung’s Tri-Fold Phone is Coming!
The Nintendo Switch 2 is Finally Here!
June 06, 2025
Captions not detected. You can watch the video, but not search it. If you think this is an error, contact support.
01:29:56
The Nintendo Switch 2 is Finally Here!