Search Captions & Ask AI

Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363

November 18, 2022 / 53:51

This episode of True Crime Garage discusses the case of Jennifer Kessie, focusing on her disappearance and the investigation surrounding it. Key topics include the discovery of her car, surveillance footage, and the involvement of her boyfriend, Rob.

The Orlando Police Department received a call about Jennifer's car parked at Huntington on the Green, a less desirable area near her condo. The car was found locked, and police noted that Jennifer's boyfriend was a prime suspect. They observed his reaction when they opened the trunk, which did not contain her.

Surveillance footage showed a person exiting Jennifer's car shortly after it was parked. This individual was estimated to be between 5'3" and 5'5" tall, but their face was obscured by a fence post in the footage. Despite efforts to enhance the video, the identity of the person remains unknown.

The episode also covers the tracking dog that traced a scent from Jennifer's car back to her condo complex, suggesting a possible connection between the suspect and the area. The investigation faced challenges, including the lack of evidence found in her car and the failure to process her condo.

Listeners are encouraged to engage with the case and share their thoughts on the evidence presented, as the search for answers continues.

TLDR

The episode covers Jennifer Kessie's disappearance, car discovery, surveillance footage, and police investigation challenges.

Episode

53:51
00:00:00
foreign [Music] [Applause] today [Music] welcome to True Crime garage wherever you are whatever you are doing thanks
00:00:43
for listening I'm your host Nick and with me as always is a man who goes by Dennis Solari because you know Phil is
00:00:50
dead he is the captain that's why I make all my passengers sign a waiver it's good to be seen and it's good to see you
00:00:56
thanks for listening thanks for telling your Phil [Music] we are sipping on Carlson Amber ale by
00:01:07
the Exquisite Brewers over at the Elizabeth brewing company from out west in Elizabeth Colorado this medium-bodied
00:01:15
Tawny colored ale is brewed with roasted barley and Dark Crystal malts making it
00:01:20
almost as nutty as the captain and we have been drinking cold beer thanks to our good friends right here first up
00:01:26
cheers to Nicole in Houston Texas and a big shout out to Sherry Oh Sherry from Kaysville Utah next up a cheers to our
00:01:36
friend Ally all the way out in Australia yeah it's a shame about those fires right now in Australia big shout out to
00:01:43
Jesse in Columbus Ohio next up we have a cheers to Maya in Paris France wee wee and last but not least we have a big
00:01:51
high five to Samantha in Salem Oregon thanks to everybody for filling up the fridge for this week's show if you want
00:01:58
to help us out with next week's show go to True Crime garage.com and click on that tiny little donate button and right
00:02:04
now till January February 12th you can order a zodiac zip up hoodie or the True Crime garage Brewing Company pullover
00:02:13
hoodie those are on pre-order right now till January 12th go to True Crime garage.com and click on the store page
00:02:20
that is enough of the biggest news all right everybody gather around grab a chair grab a beer let's talk some true
00:02:26
crime [Music] [Music] thank you [Music] days after Jennifer vanished around 8 15
00:03:02
a.m on Thursday January 26th the Orlando Police Department received a call from a
00:03:09
resident at what was at the time described by many as a CD apartment complex or like the crispy Colonel would
00:03:17
call it poopy that's a real estate term this is just one mile down the road from
00:03:23
Jennifer's condo the apartment complex is called Huntington on the green a Huntington on the green was a straight
00:03:31
shot from Jennifer's condo complex down Conroy Road which turned into Americana Boulevard and then a quick left on South
00:03:41
Texas Avenue this brought you to the entrance of Huntington on the green this complex was in a significantly less
00:03:50
desirable area than Mosaic at Millennia in an area known for drugs and prostitution
00:03:57
Joyce Cassie said that Jen would never go to this area of town the caller from Huntington on the green had seen the
00:04:06
stories about Jennifer kessie all over the local news and believed that her car Jennifer's car was parked in the lot
00:04:15
across from the Huntington on the green pool the police checked it out and sure enough it was Jennifer's black four-door
00:04:24
Chevy Malibu the doors were locked and it was parked front end in the in a visitor's spot in the lot oh yeah you
00:04:32
want to lock the doors because it's a bad area now we have no idea who this caller was
00:04:38
who called to report the vehicle that they believed to be the missing girls the Orlando Police Department has never
00:04:45
addressed the identity of this person the car was locked and one report we've seen says that Jennifer had a coded key
00:04:56
not one that could be copied so if that's true whoever accessed the car did so using Jennifer's own Keys the Orlando
00:05:06
Police Department never asked Drew for his spare key to Jennifer's car so it's not clear how they opened it apparently
00:05:15
police had their eye on Jennifer's boyfriend Rob as a POS possible suspect we can surmise this because he was
00:05:24
called to the location of the car by the police department and he was made to stand by as they Pride open the trunk
00:05:32
this is strange to me I've seen this in many cases to be honest with you really yeah and this is
00:05:39
to they want to observe the reaction of the person who at the time is probably their Prime Suspect right but everybody
00:05:48
reacts differently correct so so their idea is that we found this car or somebody told us where the car was
00:05:58
we go check it out it's Jennifer's car our number one suspect right now is her boyfriend
00:06:05
but this is also because they've been telling the parents and everybody else who will listen well we think that she
00:06:11
just had an argument with her boyfriend and she went off for a while and she'll be back
00:06:17
but now they're going okay well our number one suspect is the boyfriend let's take him to the car
00:06:24
and when we open up the trunk because we might find her there we want to see what his reaction is
00:06:31
if they if they open up that trunk and she is in there that's a that's breaking it down right
00:06:39
I think they want to see his reaction either way okay the problem with this tactic just like many other police and
00:06:46
detective tactics is you in a sense you're showing your hand a bit because while you want him there
00:06:54
to observe his reaction to whether she's in the trunk or not you're also giving up some details about
00:07:02
the car should you because he's there he's an observer yeah so but also you're running the risk of showing your hand to
00:07:12
him and if he's your number one suspect now he becomes less Cooperative lawyer up become less cooperative
00:07:20
and I think the other thing too is that you want to not just observe his reaction and this might even be more key
00:07:28
because as you very astutely point it out everyone reacts differently to any given
00:07:36
situation so there's you can't just write down oh he did this and and we find that to be guilt that's not you
00:07:43
can't sell that to a jury you can attempt to you don't know that they're going to buy it or not no what I think
00:07:49
this provides you more so is if she is in the trunk God forbid you want to Acqua you want to question
00:07:58
him immediately you want him in a state of of vulnerability when you start to question
00:08:05
him and you might be able to get that on the scene at that moment right rather than him being able to prepare himself
00:08:13
be it emotionally or otherwise with a phone call that says hey we found her car we found her body we need you to
00:08:21
come down to the police department to answer some questions no and now it's hey good news we just found her car it's
00:08:29
over here can you be there oh you can great uh perfect because we are we just found it we're getting ready to open it
00:08:35
up and we're probably going to need your assistance and we're probably going to have some questions yeah I'm guessing
00:08:40
there's two detectives so if it's me and you who would open up the trunk and who
00:08:44
would be staring at his face I don't I don't think that matters or probably a team of people there not just two
00:08:50
detectives now to everyone's relief and we know this obviously Captain Jennifer was not in the trunk of her car
00:08:59
police put the car on a flatbed without locking it and removed it for processing
00:09:05
here is what we know so they didn't they didn't process the condo but they're going to process
00:09:13
the car okay here's what we know was found there was one small fiber found one latent print that has no match has been
00:09:24
made to date a DVD player was strapped into the back seat with the seat belt a cell phone car charger unplugged
00:09:33
wrapped around the gear shift a pair of expensive sunglasses that Jen wore to Saint Croix flip-flops Jen's broken mail
00:09:44
key okay now we mentioned earlier that her key ring contained her car keys contained her house keys and a mail key
00:09:52
this mail key was broken and had been replaced so there was a new operating key operable key on her
00:10:03
keychain whatever was in the trunk this is interesting has never been disclosed or discussed by Orlando Police
00:10:12
Department that's curious right remember the missing briefcase her work briefcase
00:10:18
right some of her friends have said she may she kept it in the vehicle sometimes
00:10:24
overnight you know like that I think that's a pretty normal thing like if there's something that you're not so
00:10:29
you're not really worried about anybody taking it right and it's something that you all you are doing essentially is
00:10:35
lugging it schlepping it from your vehicle to your home and then back again first thing in the morning
00:10:41
I think we all do that sometimes there's there's things that you just go I better
00:10:46
off leaving leaving this in my car well yeah sometimes you need it because you want to do some work at home but most of
00:10:52
the time you can leave it in your car you used to do that all the time had a book bag that I'd take to guitar lessons
00:10:57
with me and most of the time I didn't need it so on top of that we have some friends saying that she likely at times
00:11:06
would put this in the trunk of the car so what I find interesting about this whole thing is we have a trunk that was
00:11:14
opened that was processed there may have been something in it there may not have been whatever was in
00:11:20
that trunk has never been publicly released has never been discussed by the police department but what I'm getting
00:11:27
at here is one of the items that is determined to be missing and still missing to this day is her work
00:11:32
briefcase which could have been in the trunk of that car I'm just simply pointing out there is a chance that for
00:11:40
whatever reason it's not actually missing the detectives have it the police department has it what is that uh
00:11:46
website you were talking about there's a Facebook page and there's also the uh website okay see
00:11:53
jenniferkessie.com okay and then the Facebook page I believe it is help find Jennifer Cassie Facebook page okay so
00:12:00
the but the boyfriend is still friends with the family right yeah yeah there's no problems there right so I was just
00:12:07
wondering like he would have some information of what was in that trunk and so I didn't know if they had any
00:12:14
information on one of those websites about what was in the trunk I'm I'm guessing he might actually not remember
00:12:20
though because he's probably so believed not to it's traumatized by the possibilities
00:12:27
right you know that before they bust open that trunk the other thing too is he may have been told to stand back you
00:12:33
know what I mean to stand up to stand a little ways away and then if they open up the trunk and find what
00:12:42
right whatever their strategy is for having him there then you you have him approach or you're you're telling him
00:12:49
this is what we found is this if you were a detective is this a strategy you think you'd use I would use it for the
00:12:56
purpose of not so much his reaction or or judging his reaction I would use it for the purpose of questioning him
00:13:02
immediately afterwards right because he's going to be vulnerable either way either he's innocent that he's a victim
00:13:09
and his his girlfriend potential love of his life was just killed right throw him
00:13:15
off guard and he finds out this is still days there's still hope at this time for
00:13:20
all of her loved ones that she is going to come back yeah no matter how she was taken or why she is gone there's a good
00:13:28
chance we're talking depending on how you you cut it you know we we said that 10 hour window
00:13:35
of time she could still only be missing technically for 48 Hours by this point right
00:13:42
so you want to question him when he's vulnerable and I mean vulnerable either way either he's innocent
00:13:50
and they find her and you're going to throw him at questions and he may agree to be questioned and and talk with you
00:13:58
at length or he's guilty in hiding something and he's vulnerable of his from the
00:14:05
standpoint of he's got something to hide and now you and him know it all at the same time
00:14:12
so I would use it from from that uh from that perspective all right so we don't know what was found in the trunk and we
00:14:19
don't know what was missing from the trunk correct and here's the other thing though too some of these items they're
00:14:25
not very specific on where they're found in the car so just to be clear we're not
00:14:30
saying when we say they say they've never said what was in the trunk or what was not
00:14:36
we're not saying that any of these items were not found in the trunk we just don't know we're going based off of what
00:14:43
the police has stated regarding this vehicle one thing that I found to be extremely interesting and this is an
00:14:50
area where they did seem to put a lot of effort and do their due diligence was they checked the gas level of the
00:14:59
car and their statement was that the level the gas level in the vehicle was consistent with Jennifer gassing up in
00:15:07
Fort Lauderdale and then driving to work in Ocoee on Monday and then driving home
00:15:13
from work Monday night so whatever happened in this car it did not travel a long way
00:15:20
unless someone put more gas in the tank they could determine that the car did not go through any tolls or toll booths
00:15:30
remember that Jen drove through one daily to and from work so her car did not pass through this toll or any other
00:15:39
tolls since she did herself at 6 15 pm on Monday night so what this means here is and you and I both lean toward the
00:15:49
side that she whatever took place whatever happened to her it happened after she got ready for work
00:15:56
and so if you want to use that as your angle as your go-to then what we can point out here is
00:16:05
she didn't make it very if she got to her car and started driving toward work she did not get very far because she did
00:16:13
not pass through this toll again nor did whomever took her in the photos available of Jennifer's car there is
00:16:20
what appears to be some dried mud that is visible on the lower driver's side door panel and possibly on the tires as
00:16:28
well there was some DNA that was found now that is about as much as we know about
00:16:35
the DNA was found statement yeah it's it's one of those things I understand why they have to keep so
00:16:46
much to their chest right hold it close to the vest but I wish we knew but what else wasn't found I would guess
00:16:57
captain that likely this could just be something as basic and unfortunate as touch DNA which is it does have some use
00:17:05
but could be less this also could be you know if they found a hair you know because one of the statements is one
00:17:12
small Fiber Well there's chance that there could be often this is not the case but there is a chance that there
00:17:19
could be DNA on that hair or Fiber that was found so what was not found was some of
00:17:26
Jennifer's stuff this being like her car keys her purse her iPod and either cell phone hers and Travis's
00:17:35
cell phones were not found in the vehicle if anything else was found other than the items listed above the Orlando
00:17:41
Police Department has never made this public or addressed it one thing that we do know though because Rob observed this
00:17:50
remember he's near the vehicle or on the scene at the time Rob says that Jennifer's driver's seat
00:17:57
was pushed way back further back in his opinion more so than what Jennifer would
00:18:03
have left it this could imply that whomever last operated the vehicle was taller than Jennifer who is listed at
00:18:11
five seven or five eight there was no evidence of any disturbance inside the car however as Joyce told CNN
00:18:19
quote there was no sign of trauma in the vehicle whatsoever end quote the Orlando
00:18:24
Police Department believes that the car was wiped down wiped clean crime scene texts scoured the Huntington on the
00:18:33
green area and picked through a trash container at one point they are seen photographing a gym bag and some other
00:18:40
items it is not known whether these items are even related to Jennifer or Jennifer's case
00:18:47
contrary to online rumors her keychain was never found there there were some reports out there that eventually I
00:18:58
think this was quite some time later that I a keychain and or a key fob belonging to Jennifer was later found
00:19:06
and that is just not true but it's pretty clear that the vehicle was processed yes everything from the car
00:19:14
this includes whatever was in the trunk was sent to Crime Labs operated by the FBI and the Florida Department of Law
00:19:24
Enforcement so how did Jen's car get to Huntington on the green Jen yeah or Huntington on the
00:19:34
poop Jen never activated the satellite GPS system in the vehicle this is because it cost a
00:19:43
monthly fee police surveyed the area to see if there were any surveillance cameras and sure
00:19:50
enough on the roof overlooking the pool area of this apartment complex were some
00:19:55
ancient it was like 30 year old cameras which still took shots of the pool and parking lot area
00:20:05
this is every two to three seconds so just to be clear here this is not like a a constant motion recording video
00:20:14
recording this is more or less every couple of seconds snap a photo snap a photo snap a photo
00:20:22
this would make somewhat you know Herky jerky video when you try to watch it later the time stamp on the surveillance
00:20:30
cameras was off by an hour and as you and I know that it's always off well we we discussed that and I have some I have
00:20:39
some background in this being a Security administrator for years at a condo complex yeah
00:20:48
the thing that that often takes place and this is usually just by smaller operations we had a larger operation and
00:20:55
we were you know these were that's what she said these were higher skill level positions
00:21:02
than what you find at most areas in most areas what you have is you have some third-party
00:21:09
um Boy Scout looking well that's giving them too much credit because the Boy Scouts would have been fantastic at
00:21:14
security work they're always prepared the but this is some kind of Rinky Dink operation that's usually hired off
00:21:23
some third-party operation that comes in they don't really care I actually called
00:21:27
Rinky Dink security company they're not they're not invested in caring about the
00:21:32
actual job these are guys and women that come in there they make slightly above minimum wage they're just there to sit
00:21:41
in a seat and provide the Optics of actual security what takes place then is the people in charge of these cameras
00:21:49
regardless if they're 30 years old or 30 months old right when we fall ahead or spring forward no
00:21:57
one bothers to update the time on the cameras so when you have to go back later and try to find something that
00:22:04
creates another obstacle for trying to locate whatever it is that you may or may not be uh what you believe you're
00:22:12
looking for right so despite all of this there was some useful material found on
00:22:19
the footage stored in the cameras Jennifer's Malibu drove into the parking lot at Huntington on the green around 11
00:22:27
59 a.m on Tuesday January 24th this is right around the time that the kessies were mobilizing for their Drive North
00:22:38
they've already been made aware of something's going on they are in route to get to Jennifer's place to see and
00:22:45
find out what's going on the car drove front end into a parking spot with its rear facing the camera whoever was
00:22:54
driving stayed inside the car for 32 seconds before exiting the vehicle then another camera captured the same person
00:23:04
walking on the sidewalk along the fence line surrounding the pool the pool area walking out of view never looking back
00:23:14
this was big police had footage of the driver of the car of an abducted Jennifer Cassie
00:23:22
surely this was going to be the break that the family and the detectives needed but sadly the black and white
00:23:29
video footage does not help us find the killer or the abductor yeah the person who walked away from the car
00:23:40
it's been released they are estimated to be this is by the FBI estimated to be between five foot three inches and five
00:23:49
foot five inches tall whoever this person is got the luckiest of all Lucky breaks
00:23:56
yeah when you hear this hold on to your seats right now when you hear this you're not going to believe it despite
00:24:01
the fact that he or she is not in any way attempting at all to hide their face his or her face is obscured by the fence
00:24:11
post in every one of the shots taken by the camera yeah there's three pictures I
00:24:17
believe right yeah and each time and there's two thicker poles and twice the person's face is blocked
00:24:28
by the thicker pole yeah you know how I mean when you have a fence and you you know you got all the little but then you
00:24:35
have the post it's almost like this person got lucky enough that there they happened the
00:24:40
picture was taken at an angle and their face their what I can only only guess would be a hideous ugly face as
00:24:49
completely covered by the fence post like you said the thicker portions I mean you can't get any luckier than
00:24:58
that yeah even if you paid somebody to try to recreate this they probably couldn't do it so Drew
00:25:07
Cassie has stated publicly that even NASA try to enhance these snapshots or the video but what we can see online is
00:25:16
the best that they say they could do the only thing that we can tell for certain
00:25:21
from the video is that the person of interest for that what is what he or she was
00:25:28
declared to be by law enforcement right it's believed to be wearing or shows wearing light-colored clothing that
00:25:35
appears White black shoes and has his or her hair in possibly a bun or has some kind of hat
00:25:43
on people have seen this video usually believe that the person of interest is wearing some kind of uniform like a
00:25:50
painters or drywallers clothing or even maybe a blind cook yeah uniform but the Orlando Police Department has announced
00:25:59
that the person of interest clothing was likely darker than it appeared and was not white so unconcluded was able to
00:26:09
clarify that the video footage taken by that camera washed out everyone's clothing color right this comes from
00:26:18
Jennifer's mother Joyce so what appears to be white clothes seemingly worn by the person of interest May in fact not
00:26:26
be so white right shockingly even though the Orlando Police Department finally released this
00:26:34
video to the public after a year of keeping it under wraps releasing it only they only released the still shots taken
00:26:43
from the video no one has been able to identify the person who we know to have been driving Jennifer's car so just to
00:26:51
be clear we have those three shots I was talking about but you're claiming that there's also actual video
00:26:57
I can't say that for certain because if there was video we'd be able to stop that video at different points
00:27:04
to get get us some kind of better look at this individual's hideous face well no because look at me
00:27:10
the way that the camera itself operated it's not operating every second it's not
00:27:16
a complete consistent okay smooth motion uh it's just a yeah it's just getting a little bit here
00:27:23
and there well there is a lot of debate that there is portions of the video that
00:27:28
has not been released and I think that's because we are only seeing um you know some snapshots that's what
00:27:35
came out a year into this case and so there there's been debate on what we're not seeing look the whole purpose of
00:27:43
releasing what they could see on there was to identify this guy so if if there is any
00:27:51
footage be it snapshot or otherwise that shows this individual's face there's no reason to not release that
00:28:00
you see what I mean it's not like it's not like we're there's some missing footage somewhere that police are
00:28:06
holding on to that shows this person's face thank you [Music] all right we're back cheers mates cheers
00:28:30
to you captain so I want to ask you a question when I'm looking at this like like I said I can
00:28:36
see three different images and that's just me Googling you can that's just me Googling
00:28:47
um Jennifer kessick yeah so they're valence is what I'm Googling yeah there's a bazillion places you can find the person
00:28:56
of interest Stills is what it's generally called here and eventually the full video or it eventually video was
00:29:05
actually released and we'll get into that in a little bit but really these Stills show you as much
00:29:13
of the person as as you're going to see at any other point right so I think especially for people that are
00:29:22
unfamiliar with this case they probably if they're right now listening and they don't have the opportunity to look this
00:29:28
up probably want to know what we think we're seeing or what we're looking at I will say this
00:29:36
like like we already mentioned the first thing I noticed there appears to be no the person is in no way trying to hide
00:29:46
or conceal their face right it's just happenstance that we can't see this individual's face and then to take that
00:29:53
a step further I believe that that the person has no idea or maybe does not care
00:30:02
that they could be film camera or yeah seen on camera um the other thing here too is with this
00:30:12
fence and with this post these this is where I have a little bit of an issue with what the statements are from
00:30:20
the police department saying that you know even though the the the person of interest even though their clothing may
00:30:27
appear to be white or lighter in color we've run some tests and it tends to White out or whitewash a lot of what the
00:30:38
camera is picking up do we know if it does anything with the darker colors because if you look at the individual's
00:30:43
shoes there there's no detail it looks like a shadow basically well and I think a lot
00:30:49
of that is because of the distance between this person and the camera the where I call this into question and
00:30:56
I'm not saying they're wrong and I'm not saying that they're lying to us I just when I look at this I'm seeing different
00:31:02
varying colors of of dark and Light right and I I just it doesn't make sense to me it seems to me like if it was
00:31:10
going to whitewash or white out it should be doing that to everything right or at least in some form or
00:31:18
fashion now I do know that they according to their statements they came up with this by placing officers and FBI
00:31:26
agents and such in front of these cameras and filming them and then looking at it afterwards and they're
00:31:31
like oh you're maybe your brown jacket appeared to be gray or appeared to be almost white so I agree with what
00:31:39
they're saying where it's not reliable information what our eyes are telling us here regarding the clothing color of the
00:31:47
person of interest however we can clearly see a dark colored fence it it appears to me like I feel I could
00:31:54
confidently say this individual is wearing lighter clut colored clothing the other thing that I want to throw out
00:32:01
there too is I can't say this with 100 certainty but everything I'm seeing tells me that this individual is male
00:32:11
um again what was the height of then well that's the other issue they stated that the person that is in the video is
00:32:21
either between five foot three inches tall and five foot five inches tall that's pretty small the problem with
00:32:27
that according to Jennifer's father is that the family was told that several agencies different law enforcement
00:32:35
agencies try to determine what the approximate height would be of the person seen in these photos right and it
00:32:43
doesn't take Sherlock Holmes or Albert Einstein to really try to figure this out because we
00:32:50
have these fence posts and there's these height markers along the way if you were
00:32:54
to throw in the angle of the camera and so on and so forth you could get a general sense for what the height would
00:33:00
be however the three different agencies came up with varying Heights each one of
00:33:06
them came up with something different what they later told the family was well even though we had different
00:33:13
thoughts on what the height of the individual could be we just decided to go with what the FBI came up with
00:33:19
so I don't know that that's 100 her father's on record is saying that they were told that they were they were
00:33:27
getting Heights as tall as five foot eleven so I really feel like you have to go
00:33:34
this could be five foot three all the way up to five foot eleven I think it's just six foot I think you just take all
00:33:40
all of all of those numbers and just throw them in together and that's the range that I believe we're looking at
00:33:46
five foot three to five foot eleven there's also a big white sign which you would typically see on a pool area
00:33:53
anywhere that don't pee in the pool well this individual would have um it would have concealed this
00:34:02
individual somewhat probably not the face looking at this angle but yeah the person gets lucky I think what I'm
00:34:08
seeing is a short-haired male who is Tanner than the his skin tone is more tan than the shirt that he is wearing
00:34:17
yeah I agree he's wearing dark shoes and I don't see anything to indicate a hat some people say a hat
00:34:26
um I do see what I think could be a bun like a hairstyle with a bun but that that's what's often reported
00:34:34
yeah but I you know what I think is given the illusion of this bun hairstyle I think that it's the the height
00:34:43
of this individual contrasting against the fence that is is so dark in these pictures I believe
00:34:50
right and but I also believe that it's the first picture the first picture it looks more like a male bob cut or
00:34:59
something you know like a yeah you know what I mean I don't see the bun in that in that picture the only
00:35:07
time that I really see a bun is look I believe that's the third picture that was taken
00:35:12
and the third picture to me I go ah that could be a bun yeah if if you had to if
00:35:18
you had to ask me exactly what I believe I'm seeing I believe I'm seeing a male and I a lot of this is gut feeling
00:35:26
Captain I don't ask me to point out hardcore evidence here what my gut tells me I'm seeing is a male who's probably
00:35:33
on the younger side I would put him no older than late 20s this could even be somebody that's
00:35:42
17 to to 28 29 his skin tone would be slightly tanner than his his the color of his shirt
00:35:52
which again we don't know what the color of that is well have you seen the image and I would
00:35:57
put him it just below to average height see somebody took the image and and reversed made it a negative
00:36:10
and in the third image it almost looks like there's something uh because where the head would be is in
00:36:19
between like a triangle like in the fence and it almost on the first image on the
00:36:27
well yeah on the first image and on the third image the the back of the head is in that little triangle not triangle in
00:36:38
the corner of the square yeah yeah the rectangle and but it's almost like there's something
00:36:47
blocking it so when they made it a negative it makes that what appears to be like a
00:36:54
bun a man bun or right that's what I said earlier I believe you're getting the appearance of that because of the
00:37:00
contrast between this person's head and the the fence itself yeah because if you
00:37:06
see like it it gives the appearance and I can't tell if this looks like it's radiating from the
00:37:13
Sun from you know that it's changing what the camera is picking up based off of the sun and the angles in play here
00:37:19
and what you're getting is some flashing off of that fence which is giving the appearance that there is nothing there
00:37:26
where this individual clearly has darker hair making it have the appearance of a bun
00:37:32
which it could be flush and flat there right and then that's what it definitely appears more that way when they reverse
00:37:40
and have a negative of the image so I think that's a very good thing that he pointed out
00:37:46
so yeah I for a minute I was leaning more towards female when I was looking at it but now
00:37:55
when you talk about the difference and and the height that could be you know anywhere from yeah three to five eleven
00:38:02
possibly even six foot and I almost feel like it's the the walk the gate yeah it's very long yeah
00:38:10
yeah it just the again I you know the motion or the stills just feel to me like I'm seeing a a man there so we have
00:38:20
Bridge guy from uh Delphi I guess now we have fence guy yeah from here yeah um we did say that the video was
00:38:28
eventually released this took place when uh Drew and Joyce Cassie persuaded the Orlando Police Department to release the
00:38:37
video this took place in May of 2007. this was in hopes that someone would recognize the suspect as one of the
00:38:44
detectives on the case told CBS News quote we're hoping that somebody would come forward and say oh yeah that's my
00:38:51
boyfriend or that's my cousin we know that did not happen right now we have zero information about the supposed
00:38:59
small amount of DNA found in Jen's car in 2016 a detective said that the DNA from the car or from items found in
00:39:10
Jennifer's car would be sent in for re-testing using new techniques it has not it's not known whether anything came
00:39:19
of this more recent testing once the Orlando Police Department finished processing the Chevy Malibu
00:39:28
they did return this vehicle to Jen's parents the car was a lease and unfortunately it was returned to the
00:39:36
leasing company so any new techniques for extracting evidence that they didn't find at the time or couldn't locate at
00:39:44
the time cannot be done since this car is gone so the thing here though Captain I feel
00:39:53
like is a very important question that we have to ask ourselves why did or why would the person of
00:40:03
interest park her car at Huntington on the green what is the motive for this movement
00:40:12
because when we look at this we have to or we could easily I know I shouldn't say have to but we could
00:40:22
easily surmise that whatever happened to Jennifer or whatever stopped her from going about
00:40:30
her day as she routinely would this took place before this vehicle was placed there so potentially this was
00:40:37
something that was unnecessary to The Taking of Jennifer this is something added that the person
00:40:45
of interest that's what they're calling the man seen in the footage right this is something extra that that he did
00:40:52
so what do we think could be the motives for this extra movement this extra action yeah I see what you're saying I I
00:41:00
lean towards the idea that that she she could have been in her car and then she was carjacked and this could have
00:41:07
happened right outside her condo or this could happen on her way to work and and to me then it just makes the
00:41:16
most sense that she's hijacked and then and then whatever wherever they take her and then and then
00:41:27
they return the car because it's a lot easier to hide a body or a person than it is to hide a vehicle right the thing
00:41:36
here though is under that scenario then we have to there there's a couple more ideas that
00:41:42
would be involved in that so one there's no sign of trauma or struggle in the vehicle itself
00:41:49
now that doesn't mean that somebody couldn't gain control of this young woman without there being a struggle
00:41:55
that it's very possible but we would have to assume that that then took place then take that a step further now if
00:42:04
she's not in the vehicle driving around her condo complex or immediately coming out of the condo complex
00:42:11
very likely the perpetrator unless they decided to look at her address on her driver's license mind you she just moved
00:42:20
there less than three months before might not even be updated by this point the the then driver the perpetrator
00:42:27
would have no idea where the vehicle came from so that would mean they're just picking a random spot they didn't
00:42:33
pick hunting a Huntington on the green because they knew it to be different from the origin of the vehicle that
00:42:39
morning right what I'm pointing out here and this is not 100 your your theory is as
00:42:46
good as any out there until we know what happened to Jennifer Cassie what I'm pointing out here is that if in
00:42:53
fact this is an added action and if in fact this took place meaning she was abducted from her
00:43:00
condo on the way from her condo to her car or as she's getting in her car right if that's what took place then this is
00:43:09
certainly an added action that is unnecessary to what the original motive would be the original motive would be to
00:43:16
abduct a young attractive woman right not to abduct a young attractive woman and move her car
00:43:23
what it points out to me that is if in fact this is an added action then what that means is
00:43:29
the victim and the perpetrator have they share something in common and what they
00:43:36
share in common is this condo complex now we need to set up a situation a scenario where the police and detectives
00:43:44
can easily surmise that she might not have been abducted from her condo or from the complexes grounds
00:43:53
now I'm putting the vehicle in another location to give a whole different realm of possibilities removing me or at least
00:44:02
making me a less likely suspect because her and I the perpetrator and the victim
00:44:08
share one thing in common the condo complex right but I think you're a little Brazen to want to move
00:44:16
the vehicle because it's a it gives you another scenario where you can get caught
00:44:22
and maybe you have some story that you can explain away why you have the car but to me if so that would probably mean
00:44:30
that you knew the victim better than just being acquaintances with her right and that's where I say what is the
00:44:38
motive for this added action because you're putting yourself at further risk of getting caught so that
00:44:44
must have been great enough the motive must have been great enough for you to risk that right and truly you're right
00:44:51
and and I'm right no one really knows for sure at the end of the day I just wanted to point out that I believe the
00:44:59
proximity to the Mosaic at the Millennia uh and where the vehicle is found is likely
00:45:07
not a coincidence the two locations are just about a mile apart in a huge City and I think you and I are agreeing here
00:45:16
in the sense that this means something that this either means the vehicle itself is a crime scene even if that
00:45:25
wasn't later detected by anybody or this is to throw off the police meaning that the person of interest had some
00:45:33
connection to the location where the car came from the apartment the condo complex yeah and look I'm a little call
00:45:41
to action here I'm gonna post those three images their surveillance images onto our Instagram at True Crime garage
00:45:49
I will also toss them up on our Facebook so if you're on Facebook True Crime garage as well or you could Google them
00:45:57
but let us know in the blog what you think maybe somebody out there can see something that somebody else
00:46:05
hasn't yet yeah or or has some kind of life experience or whatever that will will play into some idea that we've not
00:46:12
discussed right but we're not done with this uh car yet right or the person of interest so despite initially looking
00:46:21
promising the car and then the surveillance video they're not really super helpful right
00:46:30
right and another piece of confusing evidence in this case the Orlando Police Department employed a tracking dog named
00:46:37
Beau to sniff Jennifer's car in the Huntington on the green lot and then track that scent
00:46:47
he walked the 1.1 miles straight back to Mosaic at Millennia instead of going through the main gate
00:46:57
he walked past that area through a large break in the fence which separated the development from the public sidewalk and
00:47:07
to the bottom of the open air back stairwell that leads up to Jennifer's condo on the second floor
00:47:15
okay if the tracking dog is accurate then whoever drove the Malibu left it in that parking lot and then walked back to
00:47:25
the condos where Jennifer lived yeah it this that seems to be the primarily the reason that the the kessies Drew
00:47:35
Joyce and Logan all believe that one or more of the workers that were working there are responsible for what happened
00:47:42
to Jennifer now there has been some argument that the dog here's the problem and I've
00:47:52
discussed this well there's always problems with dogs well every case you got to believe it or
00:47:58
not you gotta believe the dog or not well and they can't exactly they're not telling you exactly they're they're
00:48:03
tracking something they can't tell us exactly what it is that they are tracking so keeping that in mind many
00:48:10
people have pointed out well is it possible that the dog is just retracing the the movements of this
00:48:17
vehicle all the way back to where it came from right I understand that argument the problem I
00:48:24
have with that argument is that it didn't the dog didn't go through the main gate
00:48:29
the dog essentially went through a hole in the fence went through a broken down portion of the fence and then back to
00:48:37
that's where that's how somebody would go on foot not the movements of the vehicle
00:48:43
somebody drive that vehicle off-road so I find it you don't know I I find it to be more
00:48:53
heavily more accurate or more likely I should say right that the person of interest whoever left that vehicle in
00:49:00
that parking lot went back to the condo on foot right but if the person of the interest wasn't in the car that long you
00:49:07
would think that the dog would have a hard time picking up that person's scent and that's what they would be following
00:49:13
back if they only move the car from the condos to the apartments it's only a mile
00:49:22
right so I I don't know but then you have to call in a question what is the dog tracking right because it seems
00:49:30
again like I pointed out with the the where the vehicle was placed and where we know
00:49:38
it would have been at one time regardless if Jennifer moved it or the the person of interest no no no no no no
00:49:43
no I I agree with you somewhat but what I'm saying is if that perpetrator or the POS
00:49:51
was in that car for a little bit longer then maybe that would be more of a substantial
00:49:58
substance for the dog to track that's what I'm saying right no I know exactly what you're
00:50:04
saying I'm just pointing out that I think I find it too big of a coincidence that the car is found within
00:50:10
1.1 walking miles distance right from where it started off or should have been so to me that that is too much of a
00:50:19
coincidence that it was moved for any other reason other than for it not to be found at the condo company and then to
00:50:25
top that off the dog does not know where Jennifer kessie lives it's too much of a
00:50:30
coincidence that the dog then returns to the apart to the condo complex right right but okay to be clear it just the
00:50:38
dog doesn't go to to her door it just goes to this it's a parking garage where her car came from right
00:50:48
yeah that's well not the garage her parking spot it goes to the stairwell that led this
00:50:56
these are the stairs that she would have had to go to and from to get from condo
00:51:02
to car car to condo yeah because I I just wonder if it's possible that this individual didn't just go back
00:51:09
to the condo unit to get in a car and leave if he actually went back into her condo
00:51:16
I can't yeah I can't see which makes me very upset that they didn't process her condo I feel like had this this
00:51:25
individual I mean why would the dog stop all of a sudden there I mean the the dog traced this scent for
00:51:34
1.1 miles to the to the stairs or near the stairs in that parking area right if this perpetrator went back up to her
00:51:45
condo you think the dog would go I think the dog would have went all the way up there I think you're right I think that
00:51:51
I think this individual the reason why the dog stops there is the foot traffic scent that was created by this
00:51:58
perpetrator ended there meaning this individual got into his vehicle or somebody else's and left right
00:52:06
that Captain technically is the end of the actual known evidence all of it in this case but it is far far from over
00:52:16
and there is so much more to discuss all right Colonel do we have any recommended reading this week well we've
00:52:31
done missing persons cases for the last two weeks so I think it's only fitting that we feature a great book called The
00:52:39
Lost Brothers a family's decades long search by Jack elhi this is the story of a decades-long ordeal one of the oldest
00:52:48
known active missing child investigations told by a writer whose own research for an article in 1998
00:52:54
sparked new interest in the boy's disappearance check that out by going to truecrime garage.com you can find all of
00:53:02
our recommended titles there on the recommended page yeah make sure you check us out on the Stitcher app you can
00:53:08
get all of our old episodes for free and you can check out our other show off the
00:53:14
record our bonus show off the record on Stitcher premium until next week be good
00:53:21
be kind and don't litter foreign [Music] [Applause] [Music]

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 60
    Most heartbreaking

Episode Highlights

  • The Mysterious Call
    A resident reported seeing Jennifer's car parked at a nearby complex, raising questions.
    “The caller believed that her car was parked in the lot across from the pool.”
    @ 04m 06s
    November 18, 2022
  • The Locked Car
    Jennifer's locked car was found with no signs of forced entry, raising suspicions.
    “The doors were locked and it was parked front end in a visitor's spot.”
    @ 04m 24s
    November 18, 2022
  • Surveillance Footage
    Cameras captured the driver of Jennifer's car, but the footage was not clear enough to identify them.
    “This was big; police had footage of the driver of an abducted Jennifer Cassie.”
    @ 23m 16s
    November 18, 2022
  • The Luckiest Break
    A person of interest's face is obscured in every shot, raising questions about luck.
    “You can't get any luckier than that!”
    @ 24m 54s
    November 18, 2022
  • Video Release Hopes
    Despite the release of video footage, no one has been able to identify the suspect.
    “We're hoping that somebody would come forward and say, 'Oh yeah, that's my boyfriend.'”
    @ 38m 46s
    November 18, 2022
  • The Lost Brothers
    A family's decades-long search for a missing child, reigniting interest in the case.
    “Check that out by going to truecrimegarage.com.”
    @ 52m 41s
    November 18, 2022

Episode Quotes

  • This is just one mile down the road from Jennifer's condo.
    Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363
  • There was no sign of trauma in the vehicle whatsoever.
    Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363
  • It's almost like this person got lucky enough that their face is covered.
    Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363
  • This individual is male, probably on the younger side.
    Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363
  • It's too much of a coincidence that the dog returns to the condo complex.
    Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363
  • I can't see which makes me very upset that they didn't process her condo.
    Jennifer Kesse /// Part 2 /// 363

Key Moments

  • Cheers to Listeners01:26
  • Jennifer's Vanishing02:59
  • Police Investigation05:06
  • Height Debate32:23
  • Walking Back46:47
  • Dog Tracking Debate47:15
  • Coincidence Discussion50:10
  • Case Not Over52:16

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown