
This episode covers the case of Jordan Brown, an 11-year-old boy accused of murdering his soon-to-be stepmother, Kenzie Houck, in 2009. Key topics include the background of Jordan's family, the investigation, trial, and the eventual overturning of his conviction.
The episode begins with a discussion about Jordan's family dynamics, including his mother's allegations against his father, Chris Brown, and the impact of Kenzie's arrival in their lives. The hosts highlight the jealousy Jordan may have felt, which some believe could have motivated the crime.
Details of the investigation are presented, including witness testimonies and the evidence against Jordan, such as gunshot residue found on his clothing and a shotgun in his room. The hosts question the validity of the evidence and discuss the inconsistencies in witness statements.
The trial is covered in depth, with the prosecution arguing that Jordan acted with premeditation. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and does not definitively link Jordan to the crime.
Ultimately, the episode concludes with the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Jordan's conviction due to insufficient evidence, leaving listeners with lingering questions about the true perpetrator of the crime.
Jordan Brown, 11, was accused of murdering his stepmother; his conviction was later overturned due to insufficient evidence.

This episode stands out for the following:
Jordan needed to learn how to deal with his emotions.Getting Away With Murder /// Part 2 /// 552
This is incredibly misleading.Getting Away With Murder /// Part 2 /// 552
It's a complete [ __ ] yes.Getting Away With Murder /// Part 2 /// 552
It's almost like law enforcement dismissed any idea of an intruder Theory.Getting Away With Murder /// Part 2 /// 552
It ain't bringing back Kenzie and the baby.Getting Away With Murder /// Part 2 /// 552
This whole story... it's all very unsatisfying.Getting Away With Murder /// Part 2 /// 552