Search Captions & Ask AI

Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842

May 14, 2025 / 01:11:53

This episode of True Crime Garage covers the case of Laurianne Hill's murder, focusing on Walter Zmpic, his conflicting statements, and the investigation that led to his arrest.

The hosts, Nick and Captain, discuss Zmpic's initial interviews in 1985, where he provided inconsistent alibis regarding his whereabouts on the night Hill disappeared. Despite passing a lie detector test, cold case investigators revisited the case in 2008, leading to new revelations from Zmpic's mother, Carol, about phone calls from Hill seeking Zmpic.

In 2008, Zmpic admitted to lying to police but could not recall why. The hosts analyze the implications of his mother's statements and the inconsistencies in Zmpic's accounts. They also highlight the role of cold case investigators in uncovering new evidence, including witness testimonies and Zmpic's scratches observed by a family friend.

The episode details Zmpic's arrest in 2008, his trial, and the defense's arguments regarding the lack of physical evidence linking him to the crime. The hosts discuss the impact of a mistrial and the subsequent dismissal of charges against Zmpic.

Finally, the episode touches on the aftermath of the case, including a Dr. Phil appearance featuring Zmpic and Hill's sister, Rachel, who expressed her belief in Zmpic's guilt. The episode concludes with a discussion of a potential new suspect, James Dean Warley, in the murder of Hill.

TLDR

Walter Zmpic's conflicting statements lead to his arrest for Laurianne Hill's murder, but a mistrial raises questions about his guilt and new suspects emerge.

Episode

1:11:53
00:00:00
At Eisener Ramper, we are creative problem solvers that take a 360° approach, focusing on you. We're an
00:00:06
award-winning firm with decades of experience. Eisener, let's get you ready. The rural
00:00:14
way of life is about making everyone feel at home. Tractor Supply chose advanced 5G solutions from T-Mobile for
00:00:20
business to transform intelligent customer service. Together, we put the power of AI to work across 2200 stores,
00:00:28
keeping things running seamlessly inside, curbside, and countryside. This is elevated customer experience. This is
00:00:35
tractor supply with T-Mobile for business. Take your business further at t-Mobile.com/now.
00:00:42
[Applause] [Music] Welcome to True Crime Garage. Wherever you are, whatever you're doing, thanks
00:01:28
for listening. I'm your host Nick and with me as always is a man who is like the Michael Jordan of being a son of a
00:01:35
[ __ ] Here is the captain. Yeah, the roof is the ceiling. It's good to be seen and good to see you. Thanks for
00:01:42
listening. Thanks for telling a [Music] friend. Today we got some more beer in the old garage fridge. We are drinking
00:01:51
Lawn Mower Yard Logger by Churchill Brewing Company. Lawn Mower Yard Logger is delightfully crisp and refreshing.
00:01:59
It's lightbodied, a little malty, and very crushable. Garage grade, three and a half bottle caps out of five. And
00:02:06
let's give some thanks and praise to our good garage friends. First up, a big shout out to Christy Ha in Vancouver,
00:02:14
Washington. And a big time we like your jib goes out to Justin from Castle Rock,
00:02:20
Colorado. Here's a cheers to April C in Ramsay, Minnesota. I purposely let you have this one because you came up with
00:02:28
this nickname. So, the shout out is to Jessica and Captain Big Dick, somebody we met at at a Crime Con. And they're
00:02:35
from Clayton, North Carolina. Jessica and Captain Big Dick from Clayton, North Carolina. And raise your glasses in the
00:02:41
air to Jessica and Captain Big Dick and Clayton, North Carolina. And last, but certainly not least, here's one close to
00:02:50
the garage. We got to cheers to Dominic in Columbus, Ohio. Everyone we just mentioned, they went to
00:02:55
truerimedg.com, clicked on the pint glass, helped us out with this week's beer run for the beer fund, and for that
00:03:02
we thank you. Yeah. BW are you in? Beer run. If you have a topic that you'd like
00:03:07
to hear on the show, whether it's the the big show like we call the big garage show like we call this show or off the
00:03:16
record, hit us up. Captain True Crime Garage. And that is enough of the business. All right, everybody. Gather
00:03:22
around, grab a chair, grab a beer. Let's talk some true crime. Where we left off here, Captain, was the
00:03:45
police talking and speaking with Walter Zempic back in 1985, giving conflicting statements to different investigators,
00:03:54
conflicting statements about his whereabouts of the night in question to different law enforcement agencies.
00:04:01
However, what we do know is that police moved on from Walter Zmpic after he passed a lie detector test back in
00:04:11
1985. The exam, which was of course all centered around on questions if he had killed Lori, revealed no deception. So,
00:04:21
at some point they decided to move on from him and the case went cold until 2008. So, let's fast forward back to
00:04:28
2008. go back to the future here. The cold case investigators reviewed that case file and were struck by these
00:04:36
inconsistencies that they were seeing in Walter Zimpik's stories. They spoke with
00:04:41
his mom, Carol. Now, his mother, Carol, had been interviewed in 1985, but because Zimick had already passed that
00:04:49
lie detector test when she was spoken to, she was never really asked about her son's alibi in ' 85. She was only asked
00:04:58
about like his character. Now, in 2008, she tells the cold case investigators the following. That on the evening that
00:05:06
Laurianne Hill disappeared, Zmpic had left their home to go find her, stating that later that evening, Hill called the
00:05:14
house three times looking for Walter Zimp. The first call was early in the evening. We don't we're not getting
00:05:21
exact times on some of this, Captain, but keep in mind, she's being asked these questions 23 years after the fact.
00:05:27
So during this first call, Carol answers the phone. She says that she was surprised. She thought that that her son
00:05:34
was already with Lorie Hill. So she was surprised that Lori was calling and looking for her son. Then she says there
00:05:41
was a second call. This took place several hours after the first call. And this is the one that it sounds like
00:05:51
investigators believe that this is the call that most likely came from Mr. G's Pizza. And this is because Carol, when
00:06:01
she's talking to the police, she says, "Look, I remember it being very noisy in the background. And I also remember Lori
00:06:09
being very angry when I told her, look, I already told you he's not home. So, he's still not home at this time,
00:06:18
several hours after the first call. Well, this call could have came from the party as well. We don't know if she made
00:06:24
a call from the party. That's a good point. And we also don't have timestamps for these calls. Exactly. So, she also
00:06:30
remembered that Lori was again very angry during a third call, which she says she believes was 1 hour later.
00:06:39
Approximately 1 hour later, she even swore at the mother, saying something nasty to the mother and then hung up on
00:06:47
her. During the third call though, the mother Carol says that she couldn't hear noise in the background. There wasn't a
00:06:54
bunch of noise in the background like she had heard on the second call. Carol further remembered that the phone rang
00:07:00
two more times that night. The the first of those two was very late. Again, it was this time it was Hill's sister,
00:07:08
Lorianne Hill's sister, Rachel, calling looking for her. Carol remembered that after that phone call, her son Walter
00:07:16
Zmpic came home with his friend whose last name Carol remember being Lon L O N W A Y. We would later learn, so she
00:07:29
doesn't know this in her statement uh at at this time when she's giving the statement in 2008. We would later learn
00:07:36
that a a friend of Zmpix did exist with the last name of Lon and his name was Willie Lway. So
00:07:47
Zmpic's mother, Carol, stated that Lon was a good friend of Zimpics and that he was around Zimpik's age. Carol noted
00:07:55
that Zimpic was drunk when he came home. Later, the phone rang again. She says again, it was Lorianne Hill's sister
00:08:03
reporting that Lori was missing. Zmpic then said that he was leaving to go to Lorie Hill's parents' home and he left
00:08:14
with Willie Lonway. Upon questioning by the investigators during this interview,
00:08:19
Carol was consistent in her memory of the events of October 25th, 1985. It's interesting, too, here, Captain, that
00:08:28
not only is she, you know, not only does she say she remembers it, but but she appears to remember that quite clearly,
00:08:35
being able to give some decent description to some of the the phone calls and the order of the events. Now,
00:08:44
regardless of how much weight and credibility we want to give to Walter Zmpik's mother's statement in 2008, we
00:08:54
need to note that that is completely inconsistent with what Walter Zmpic told investigators in 1985. Both stories,
00:09:02
right? Both stories that he gives. Now, in 2008, we have Walter Zmpic. He's living in Strawberry
00:09:10
Plains, Tennessee. Strawberry Plains Forever. Investigators traveled there to speak with him armed with a search
00:09:19
warrant for his DNA. In the interview, he admitted he had lied to both the Lucas County and Fulton County
00:09:27
authorities back in 1985, but he said he he couldn't remember why he lied to them, but he did deny being with Willie
00:09:36
Lway at all. Yeah. So, this is December 30th, 2008. And we do have the we have the
00:09:44
transcript from that. We'll we'll read through a brief portion of it here. This is the part of the 2008 interview where
00:09:55
the detectives are confronting him about his statements that he gave in 1985. So, the first question is, okay,
00:10:03
I'm going to ask you this again. Now, you gave two different statements to two different police officers and both of
00:10:10
them we know were lies because you weren't home that night. Your mom said you weren't home. Lori called your house
00:10:18
and if Lori called looking for you, that means you weren't home. Walter's answer,
00:10:24
right? Question. So, we are clear. The 29th, 2 days later, uh, and then on the 1st, 3 days later, you talked to police.
00:10:34
All of this is fresh in your mind. They're talking about all of this is fresh in your mind at the time. Right.
00:10:40
They say, "What did you do on that night?" And you said, "Well, I was home at 7:00 and I went to sleep at 11:00."
00:10:46
Which isn't true because your mom said you weren't home. Answer: Right. I wasn't home. Question. Then 4 days
00:10:53
later, you talk to different police. They say, "What did you do? I went to Southwick, meaning the mall that he had
00:11:00
mentioned. Hung out with this girl. I can't remember her last name. She was at my house from 10 till 2, which wasn't
00:11:07
true, right? She wasn't at your house from 10 to 2. Answer: no question. So that's twice. That's two stories that
00:11:15
weren't true that you'd given to police just after your girlfriend is found murdered. Answer. Uh-huh. And
00:11:24
affirmative is is the response given there. He's he's agreeing with what they're saying. Well, I can say if I'm
00:11:30
law enforcement, if I'm a detective and somebody is inconsistent and somebody's lying, that is a that's like giving a
00:11:39
dog a bone. And I would have a hard time letting go of that bone. Yes. And clearly in
00:11:46
2008, that's the investigator's feelings as well. I if it were me there interviewing him, I wouldn't show any
00:11:55
signs of this. I wouldn't react to it or I wouldn't say anything. But it would be
00:11:59
surprising to me for him to just so casually agree. Yeah, I was. Yeah, I did lie. Yeah, I did give two different
00:12:06
statements. Like he doesn't seem to try to talk his way out of that. It's kind of strange though that he doesn't
00:12:13
remember. He's basically telling law enforcement, "Yeah, I lied, but I don't remember the reason why." But you have
00:12:20
to remember he's he's a young adult at this time. So, is it just possible that he just got scared initially? Like, yes,
00:12:29
she was my exgirlfriend. Yes, she was calling me. You know, we know what happened to her. We know that her body
00:12:37
was found. Is it is it a possibility that he's just scared that somehow they're they're going to try to pin this
00:12:43
on him? See, dude, I can totally agree with that because I mean, like you said, he's 18 at the time when he's first
00:12:49
questioning questioned. She's missing for a period of time and then she's found. If he had nothing to do with
00:12:57
this, no one could imagine their girlfriend, ex-girlfriend being found dead in a cornfield days after being
00:13:04
reported missing. And now we fast forward to 2008 when they're questioning him in December of
00:13:12
2008 and it's over 20 years later. And I think that I, you know, anybody that looks back, given a long enough
00:13:22
timeline, I think anybody that looks back to their teen years and and even when they're 18, as was Walter at the
00:13:30
time of this horrible event, I think it's almost all of us can say that thing that thing was really
00:13:39
dumb. Why did I do that? I don't even know why I would do that. Like, you know what I mean? like you you don't you
00:13:44
can't even reconcile with why you would have behaved a certain way or said something in in the moment back then. It
00:13:51
it's I think of times where I I lied to get out of being busted for something or
00:13:58
kind of squirmed or weasled my way out of or into something and I kind of look back and I
00:14:05
go, why wasn't I just honest in the moment? Like Yeah. or sometimes the lie that you come up with is worse than just
00:14:13
telling the truth uh gets you into more trouble. But what are your thoughts on the statements from his mother? Is there
00:14:20
anything that jumps out to you? Well, I wish that I wasn't armed with all the information that I that I am
00:14:30
fully aware of now, right? To give you what my reaction would be to that question without all the information.
00:14:38
she's going to change her statement at some point. And so, while it sounds to me I I think that if regardless of hers
00:14:47
changing her statement, what the other statement is, I actually think that there's probably a lot of truth in this
00:14:53
statement that she gives, she remembers it so clearly and so vividly to the point of saying, "Hey, on this one call,
00:15:01
I heard a whole bunch of noise in the background and on this other call I didn't hear any noise in the
00:15:05
background." Right? And those sometimes people stretch a story and say too many words because they're trying to make up
00:15:15
for something. They're trying to cover their tracks. They're trying to sell you a lie. And other times there are details
00:15:23
in a story or explanation that simply because they're they're true. They're they're factual information or at least
00:15:32
they believe them to be true. And so I think that there's probably a lot of truth in this statement. I wouldn't boil
00:15:39
it down to that she remembers correctly 23 years later exactly how many phone calls she received. We know that she's
00:15:47
unable to provide a time other than vaguely. This one was early in the evening. This one was a couple hours
00:15:52
later. She does recall speaking to the sister at some point that the sister calls because Lori's
00:15:59
missing. I think she's got the details right. the timing's a little off, but what's what's the most important part of
00:16:06
her story is Walter Zmpic is not home during the the times that he in both of his statements, even though they're
00:16:13
different, they both end up with him being home, right, at 10:00. And that is when everything is in question because
00:16:21
regardless if you believe the Bettingers sighting of the three kids in the middle
00:16:26
of the county road on their way home. We have confirmed sightings by several people that Lorie Hill was alive and
00:16:34
well using the phone at the pizza joint. Offered more than one ride by two different credible people. Eyewitness is
00:16:42
seeing her walking. It's that 1000 p.m. time marker and everything after that is
00:16:48
in question. And he in both of his versions of his alibis for that night, he puts himself at home at 10:00. His
00:16:56
mom asked in 2008, he's not home at 10:00 in her story. Yeah. But here's what sticks out to me. And I think one
00:17:06
of the things with, you know, a tragic event is sometimes you have to try to make sense of crazy. But as you know,
00:17:16
sometimes in these cases, there's logic to it. There's reason to some of this stuff. And so what sticks out to me if
00:17:27
I'm law enforcement that where I'm confused by is I have this individual that's lying to me. Okay?
00:17:34
inconsistencies, changing stories multiple times, and then in the future now he is now telling me, "Yes, I I did
00:17:42
lie. I don't know why I did." But what she says that sticks out to me contradicts the end result in the sense
00:17:51
of she says, "Well, I got these calls from his ex-girlfriend. He's 18. She's 14. They
00:17:59
like we said they they either dated for a few months or maybe was even a little bit longer but she's calling for help
00:18:06
essentially or calling that's what he believes and we have the call from the sister. So then what does he do? He goes
00:18:14
out now whether he's by himself or with a friend he is going out. sister. The sister is calling for help because
00:18:22
because she can't find her sister because Lory's missing. According to Carol's statements, Lori isn't calling looking
00:18:30
for a ride. She's simply calling looking for Walter Zmp. But what I think sticks
00:18:36
out to me, which would be confusing if I'm law enforcement, is he goes out, whether it's by himself or with a
00:18:42
friend, to go look for her. And so to me that is an act of kindness, of caring, of you know, did something happen? Did
00:18:53
she go, you know, did he know she was going to this party? Did, you know, did he hear about this altercation? But to
00:19:00
me, it's an act of kindness or caring that I'm I need to go find her if, you know, her sister said she's missing. I'm
00:19:08
well, I'll go look for her. I'll swing by her parents house or whatever. So to me, that's an act of caring as opposed
00:19:16
to what is the end result? We have a murdered 14-year-old in a corn field. So do you see that as conflicting? The act
00:19:26
of caring? No. No. I'm saying like if I'm law enforcement, I hear the statements from his mom, it doesn't seem
00:19:32
like there there's no confrontation between Lori and Walter that we know of. So, it's just it doesn't it doesn't seem
00:19:42
to make any sense of why would he want to find her and kill her, you know, and and then also he tells his mom, "Well,
00:19:50
I'm going to go look for her." So, I don't know. It just kind of contradicts the ending, right? But I mean, I get
00:19:58
that it could be viewed as an act of kindness, but I but I mean, if you give me the afternoon, I'll give you a
00:20:03
baker's dozen of people that killed somebody and then went out and joined a search party to look for them. I think
00:20:09
the the big part that stands out to me here is regardless of why he lied, you know, he's not he's not there at 10:00.
00:20:17
He's he's confirming that in 2008. And both of his stories in 1985 put him at home at 10:00 and then a staying there
00:20:27
for the entirety of the night after that 10:00 marker. His mom's story is not that. His mom's story is that he wasn't
00:20:35
home until it was notified that she was missing. Remember, Rachel doesn't go out
00:20:39
looking for her sister until what is close to 200 a.m. That's 4 hours after that 10:00 marker. And so what what
00:20:49
stands out to me, I find it incredibly weird that if he did go out and look for as his mom says, which I believe that he
00:20:57
did, that is not anything that suggests that he is guilty, right? like I don't understand why in 1985 he didn't tell
00:21:06
them that he went out looking for that for her at 2 o'clock in the morning. Further, I want to point this out. We do
00:21:13
know based off of the reports, off of the paperwork that Walter Zmpic in 2008 was
00:21:21
was interviewed on December 30th. What we don't know is when his mother Carol was interviewed in 2008,
00:21:30
right? Because I wonder, is there a chance that mom is interviewed prior to December 30th and she calls her son and
00:21:40
says, "Hey, you're never going to believe this. The sheriff's department showed up today and they were remember
00:21:45
your old girlfriend Laurianne Hill from when you were a kid. They were asking me
00:21:49
about her disappearance and about the night that she disappeared. I mean, it's like 20ome years later, right?" And son
00:21:55
is asking, "Mom, it's highly likely." Yeah. What What did Well, what did you tell him? And she tells them what what
00:22:01
tells him what she told them. And now he is armed with information. Oh, they're probably going to come and talk to me
00:22:08
because I remember telling them something different. And he he's got some time to sort out, well, do I try to
00:22:16
talk my way out of it or do I just admit, yeah, I told you guys a story. I fed you a story back then and I don't
00:22:22
remember why or I don't know why. Yeah, that's weird to me. That that sticks out
00:22:26
to me. Why? Why? Why couldn't you remember why you lied? What was it? Question number four that I went
00:22:32
through. They get him to confirm that, right? He says they say so twice. That's two stories that weren't true that you
00:22:39
gave to police after your girlfriend is found murdered. He answers, "Uh-huh." Which is is according to the paperwork
00:22:47
is an affirmative response. And then they go on to ask him, "So how can anybody not want an explanation for
00:22:55
that? So that's why we came to you to give you a chance to explain that to us. His answer is, "Look, I don't know what
00:23:01
to say to you." I mean, I don't question. And then the next morning, you told the Hill family that you got in a
00:23:08
bar fight that night. Answer: Uhhuh. Affirmative response. Question. And then your mother, he cuts them off. Answer. I
00:23:16
don't necessarily remember that either, but I mean then the interview's cutting him off, but your mother told he cuts
00:23:24
them off. Answer this was 20ome years ago. So part of his story to Lorian Hill's family is that he was
00:23:37
in a bar fight sometime that night, which that's seems to be news to everybody else as well, right? like
00:23:43
there they weren't armed with that information in 1985. That wasn't part of his story in 1985. So, as you hear, as
00:23:50
you know, from this this uh transcript that we went through, Walter Zmpic really had no explanation for the
00:23:57
inconsistencies. He didn't even really try to explain them. And then after this 2008 interview, he spoke with both his
00:24:06
mother and with Sandy. remember the the girl that he said uh he had brought home
00:24:12
that night. So when investigators then returned to talk to his mother, Carol, all of a sudden she's less certain about
00:24:18
her story according to the investigators and they say it was clear that she had spoken with Walter Zmpic
00:24:25
since she had been interviewed by the officers several day days before and that Zmpic told her that Sandy was in
00:24:32
his bedroom on the night that Lorie Hill had been killed. And she also affirmed that Willie Lonway was the boy who was
00:24:40
with Walter Zmpic that night. So now she remembers the first name. These detectives, they do track down this
00:24:47
Sandy girl. She had never been interviewed, but up to this point. She does tell investigators that she
00:24:54
remembers dating Walter Zmpic for maybe a month this back in 1985. They did meet
00:25:00
at the Southwick Mall in the fall of 1985, but she said she did not go back to his apartment on that first night
00:25:07
that they met, and she certainly never remembers sneaking in through a bedroom window. She recalled that their first
00:25:15
phone conversation was where he told her that his ex-girlfriend had been killed and he said it happened the night that
00:25:23
they met and that she was his alibi. Have you had that moment where your kid asks for help with homework and you're
00:25:39
like, "I haven't done this since middle school." Or maybe your child's ahead of the curve and getting bored in class.
00:25:45
Whether your kid is struggling or soaring, can make a real difference. Il is an award-winning online learning
00:25:53
platform that helps kids really understand what they're learning. It covers math, language arts, science, and
00:26:00
social studies from preK all the way through 12th grade. It's designed to be engaging, personalized, and yes,
00:26:07
actually fun with encouraging feedback that keeps kids motivated. Don't miss out. L is used in 96 of the top 100
00:26:16
school districts in the US. One in four students in the US are learning with. I have friends and family that
00:26:24
have used for years. It's great for the summer months when there's no classes so
00:26:30
you can stay on track. And it's even better when there are classes trying to get ahead. Or maybe your kid needs help
00:26:37
studying for test. Most kids need help in specific areas. I know that I did. And Il is a great way to keep your kids
00:26:46
on track or to get ahead. Make an impact on your child's learning and getl now. And True Crime Garage listeners can get
00:26:54
an exclusive 20% offl membership when they sign up today atl.com/g. Visit.com/g to get the most effective
00:27:07
learning program out there at the best price. This show is sponsored by BetterHelp. The importance of
00:27:14
maintaining your mental health has gone overlooked for many years in this country. Mental health awareness is
00:27:21
growing, but there's still progress to be made. Many people avoid seeking mental health support due to fear of
00:27:28
judgment or stigma. When people hesitate to get help, it doesn't just affect them. It impacts families, workplaces,
00:27:35
and entire communities. This mental health awareness month, let's encourage everyone to take care of their
00:27:42
well-being and break the stigma. The world is better when people are healthy and happy. BetterHelp has over 10 years
00:27:51
of experience matching people with the right therapists from their diverse network of more than 30,000 licensed
00:27:58
therapists with a wide range of specialties. BetterHelp is fully online, making therapy affordable and
00:28:04
convenient, serving over 5 million people worldwide. Easily switch therapists at any time at no extra cost.
00:28:12
We're all better with help. Visit betterhelp.com/g to get 10% off your first month. That's betterhelp
00:28:24
hp.com/g. If you're a pet parent, you know about Chewy. And when they say that they have everything you need to keep
00:28:31
your pet happy and healthy, they're not messing around. To keep them happy, Chewy has over 100,000 products from all
00:28:39
the brands your pet loves at prices you love. Food, treats, beds, you name it, they have it. And it gets shipped
00:28:47
directly to your door. I love Chewy. More importantly, my dogs loved Chewy as well. It's a fantastic service. The
00:28:56
selection is huge. There's so many options to choose from for all variety of pets, not just dogs. But the thing
00:29:04
that I loved the most was the auto ship feature. One of my dogs had a dietary concern that required a certain brand
00:29:13
and make of food that was difficult for me to get and difficult for me to find. The Chewy Auto Ship saved me countless
00:29:21
hours of driving to hunt down the food that my dog needed and the excitement from the dogs when the box would arrive
00:29:28
with treats and toys for their enjoyment. Chewy has everything you need to keep your pet happy and healthy. And
00:29:35
right now, you can save $20 on your first order and get free shipping by going to chewy.com. That's chewy.com to
00:29:43
save $20 on your first order with free shipping. chewy.com. Minimum purchase required. New customers only. Terms and
00:29:51
conditions apply. See site for complete details. Treat yourself and treat your pets with chewy.com today. As
00:30:00
temperatures climb, it's easy to fall into the same old routine. Familiar tanks, wornin shorts, and the usual
00:30:09
lineup. Quint offers an effortless upgrade. elevated easy pieces that instantly refine the everyday uniform
00:30:18
without the extra effort like 100% European linen shorts and dresses from $30, Luxe swimwear, Italian leather
00:30:29
platform sandals, and so much more. The best part, everything with Quint is priced 50 to 80% less than what you'll
00:30:37
find at similar brands. by working directly with top artisans and cutting out the middleman. Quint gives you
00:30:44
luxury without the markup. And Quint only works with factories that use safe, ethical, and responsible manufacturing
00:30:52
practices and premium fabrics and finishes. I absolutely love Quint and my new favorite, European linen shorts.
00:31:00
Super comfortable and super stylish. And you know when you're getting compliments
00:31:05
from people saying, "Hey, Captain, you look well put together." And when you look good, you feel good. So, treat
00:31:11
yourself. What I also love about Quint is the quality. Topnotch quality at a great price. Like I said, 50 to 80% less
00:31:21
than what you find at similar brands. Treat yourself with Quint. Treat your closet with a little summer glow up with
00:31:28
Quint. Go to quint.com/g for free shipping on your order and 365day returns. That's at qi
00:31:39
nce.com/g to get free shipping and 365day returns. quint.com/g. Treat yourself with
00:31:56
quint. All right, we are back. Thanks for joining us here in the garage. Cheers to you all and cheers to you,
00:32:03
Colonel. Cheers to you, Captain. So, these cold case investigators, they even tracked down some of the other names
00:32:11
that they were seeing in their old case file. Some of these people, their names were in the file, but they had never
00:32:16
been interviewed. And one of those persons was a lady named Linda Ferraso. She was a family friend of the of the
00:32:26
Hills. She recalled that on October 26th, so this is the day after Lori is missing. She her body's not been found
00:32:34
yet. She recalls that Walter Zmpic was helping her post flyers looking for the missing girl. And she said that she
00:32:44
noticed that he had scratches all over his arm. That she said it looked like he like run through a a rose
00:32:53
guard and she overheard him telling someone else that he had gotten into a bar fight the night before. After 8
00:33:01
months of investigation, in 2008, Walter Zmpic was arrested at his home. Fulton County
00:33:08
detectives announced the cold case arrest to the media and they blared it with headlines screaming about the Hill
00:33:16
case cold case kidnap, rape, and murder at long last being solved. Walter Zmpic was he waved extradition, was
00:33:25
transported to Ohio to face these charges. He plead not guilty on both counts and bond was set at $1 million.
00:33:32
So really, a lot of this is going to boil down to trying to reconstruct his actual whereabouts on the night of the
00:33:41
murder. And now we have to introduce his defense attorney. He had two defense attorneys. This is a fatherdaughter duo
00:33:49
here. Lawyers Greg and Amber Van Gunton. They filed a series of motions, 36 of them, including a motion
00:33:59
to dismiss the case because they argued that their client's defense was prejudiced by the passage of 24 years
00:34:06
since the murder because some of the witnesses had died, moved on, forgotten, or just plain vanished. They argued and
00:34:13
the physical evidence had either been used up or stored improperly because it was revealed that the physical evidence
00:34:23
was misplaced. So testing that could have the result in the exoneration of their
00:34:32
client Walter Zmpic would be impossible. Right? there's there's not this physical
00:34:37
evidence still existing today while we're waiting on a court date that that there's a chance this could exonerate
00:34:46
our client. So in short, what they're saying is the delay in bringing Walter Zmpic and the delay
00:34:54
in charging him with this for 20ome years was reasons for why he was he couldn't put up a great defense.
00:35:05
at the motion to dismiss the the hearing altogether. His mother, Carol, testified
00:35:12
that she received only one phone call the night that Lorie uh went missing. She said that she did
00:35:18
not recall Willie Lway being with her son Walter at all that night. This was totally different from what she said in
00:35:26
her interview in 2008. The prosecution filed 39 motions of its own, arguing that the delayed prosecution wasn't just
00:35:34
a matter of negligent failure to prosecute back in 1985, but that actual new evidence was discovered. And that
00:35:41
new evidence, of course, being all of these inconsistencies in Zimpic's statements and his mother with her
00:35:48
flip-flopping stories that she's now giving to police. Well, this family is known for flip-flopping on their
00:35:54
stories. They're a family of flippers and a family of floppers. Floppers. Yeah. You'd think they'd be able to test
00:36:01
something to either try to link him to the crime or, you know, possibly just go, "Well,
00:36:08
we we ran the test and we didn't find his DNA, but that doesn't mean that he wasn't the killer." Well, I mean, so
00:36:16
they had the tests back then. They had the results back then, but but of course what those results are they even
00:36:23
comparable to something that you would be able to come up with in 2009, right? And and then furthermore, the whatever
00:36:30
physical evidence once that once existed, nobody can get their hands on it anymore because it was misplaced or
00:36:37
destroyed or or what have you. So, you know, people that that don't do these things, that aren't involved in these
00:36:44
things, they don't have a great understanding of how important the chain of custody of physical evidence is in
00:36:53
all of these cases. And if you slip up, if there's one misstep on the chain of custody on someone lawfully and
00:37:02
correctly storing evidence, then it's all tainted, right? It's tainted whether it was tainted at all because you can
00:37:09
argue that it was tainted if it's unaccounted for for any time. Who's to say what the hell was going on with that
00:37:16
physical evidence? And so because they don't have it or it disappeared for a while, it's it's basically moot. It's
00:37:25
it's no good. It's good for nothing. There was some physical evidence that did suggest that maybe Walter Zimp
00:37:33
wasn't the killer. They they did have a Okay, so in 2009 with Walter Zmpic facing trial, defense attorney Amber Van
00:37:41
Gunton said in interviews with members of the media that there was no evidence against her client. In fact, the
00:37:47
evidence exonerated her client. She claimed she cited the lab report testing a pubic hair found on Lori that did
00:37:56
not match Walter Zmpic. She told NBC 24, quote, "I've never been more convinced in my 10 years of law practice that this
00:38:05
man is innocent. He should be released from jail based on the evidence that has finally come forth." End quote. In
00:38:12
another interview, she says, "This case is absolutely ridiculous. I don't understand why they are still pursuing
00:38:18
charges at this time." So, remember, they're trying to get this tossed out of court altogether. the
00:38:25
the at at the first go round it does get tossed. The the judge is like, "Yeah, there's not a whole lot going on here.
00:38:33
There's not a whole lot of evidence. Uh there's nothing really new. This is not a great idea to actually charge this guy
00:38:40
and take him to to trial." But that would ultimately get overturned by a higher court. And without going
00:38:50
through all of those court proceedings that took days and days to sort through, what we what we end up with is the the
00:38:58
case was going to go to trial in 2012. The state's first witness being Craig Rup, the guy that was, you know,
00:39:07
dating Lori at the time. Remember, he said he never saw her after she left the party that night. He told the jury that
00:39:14
he had heard that Lori had been concerned that she was pregnant. and he said that he met Walter Zmpic during the
00:39:22
search for Lori. Zmpic telling him that Lori had been about to dump him, dump Craig, and if she was pregnant that the
00:39:31
baby was his Walter Zmpix. But with this fight, cuz this fight that Walter says he got in this bar fight, do we have any
00:39:41
eyewitnesses to this fight? Well, I don't think that it's even a a a sticking matter because when he's
00:39:49
interviewed in 2008, he says he doesn't remember a bar fight, right? Um he may have told one or two people that back in
00:39:58
1985, but now he's he's admitting that his statements were inconsistent, that he lied to police twice in both of those
00:40:07
statements. And then when asked about the bar fight, he's saying, "Yeah, I don't I don't remember saying that." You
00:40:12
know, I don't remember that. Doesn't remember why he lied. Doesn't remember the bar fight statements. Very
00:40:18
fascinating. Now, during this trial, we also get uh some I I there, you know, in
00:40:26
these true crime stories, Captain, there are certain things that I'm a sucker for, and I don't know why this this part
00:40:32
of these stories always intrigues me. Maybe it's that that if I were ever to be on a jury, you know, I've been called
00:40:40
for jury duty at least once that I can recall, but uh I always think that it's neat when
00:40:47
they when they go out to a scene. So, the jury was driven to Swanson to to to view the spot where Lori was last seen
00:40:56
uh and then into that rural area where her body was eventually found. They heard the testimony obviously from the
00:41:04
men who found her body. They they heard testimony from first responders and the medical
00:41:10
examiner and they also heard testimony from Lor's friends and family about the circumstances of her disappearance and
00:41:18
death. But but okay, so what actual evidence do they have against Walter Zmpic at this trial? Right. Because
00:41:29
you're going to have physical evidence. Correct. Right. you. What we end up with
00:41:33
and and you're going to love this. Oh, this is going to get your goat, my friend. We have a jailhouse confession.
00:41:43
Three months. So, three months after he's arrested, there's this guy named Steve Moden that Well, but hold on that
00:41:50
when there's no physical evidence and there's no other really hardcore evidence, they always seem to get a
00:41:58
confession. Well, because jail houses are often filled with liars and cheats who probably are willing to make a deal
00:42:06
to benefit themselves, right? And throw anyone under the bus at any time. That's
00:42:12
why I always look at these as like a with a side side eye, right? And I would I would
00:42:19
um find these more credible if the person didn't ask for anything and didn't receive anything
00:42:28
because you sometimes you don't ask for anything but but the law the law enforcement agencies that you're helping
00:42:35
out with this confession will give you something even if you don't ask for it. So here's here's the thing that boggles
00:42:43
the brain, right? So, like if if I'm just some dude, which well well I actually you are. Yeah. Um but if if I'm
00:42:51
some dude, not in a jail house, not in a prison, Mr. Joe Citizen as I am, Mr. civilian and I call up the
00:43:00
police and I say, "Hey, this guy I know, he confessed to murdering uh somebody and or or hey, I know you're
00:43:09
investigating such and such and I this person admitted it to me, told me that he did
00:43:16
it." Typically, what is their protocol? They'll mike that guy up. They'll mic me
00:43:21
up and try to get that story out of him once again, or they'll tap my phone and try to get him to tell me the story once
00:43:27
again. Right? Why in the hell in all of these jail house confessions, there's only one that I can think of where they
00:43:34
actually miked up the inmate and in that scenario they only miked up the inmate because he was
00:43:40
placed there. He was under working undercover. Why not mike up this Steve Moden and see if he can get Walter Zmpic
00:43:50
to repeat what he once told him? They never seem to do that. They just like, "Oh, you know what? Wheel his ass into
00:43:55
the courtroom and have him testify and we'll see what the let the jury sort it out." So, he says that he tells police.
00:44:02
He tells he he mailed a letter to the prosecutor. Uh, his the prosecutor's name is Scott Hasselman.
00:44:10
He mails the prosecutor a letter saying that look, I'm I'm a bit of a legal resource to some of these other inmates,
00:44:18
uh, a lot of the other persons waiting trial or that they will seek me out for some legal advice. And I ended up
00:44:28
talking with Walter Zmpic while he was locked up before his trial. He admitted to me that he kicked and beat Lori to
00:44:34
death because he wanted because she wanted to break up with him and he he couldn't handle the rejection. And the
00:44:42
Steve Moden guy goes on to say that Walter Zmpic allegedly told him that he blacked out in a fog of rage while he
00:44:49
was beating her. and that Zmpic went on to tell him that he had several people helping him out by lying to cover up his
00:44:56
crime, including a friend whose house he had walked to after dumping Lor's body in some brush. So, you got this
00:45:07
confession, supposed confession. You have a couple people that do testify that he had scratches on
00:45:15
his person. You have the inconsistent statements and then the rest is all like take it for what you will, right? Like
00:45:25
was he jealous? How jealous was he? Was she rejecting him? Could he handle the rejection?
00:45:30
You there's really no physical evidence. In fact, the physical evidence you do have if if that has if that should even
00:45:39
play a role in it, I don't know. Right? because you're going to get the defense that rightfully so will continually
00:45:48
point out that Walter Zmpik's DNA was not a match to that hair that was found on Lori. So, the only physical evidence
00:45:58
is pointing away from the guy that's on trial. Well, and if you're his defense team, you want to hit that
00:46:05
home over and over. Hey, we got physical evidence that points to somebody else, not my client. Walter Zmpic did not
00:46:14
testify at this trial. As you just correctly said here, his attorneys had effectively emphasized that there was
00:46:21
zero physical evidence against their client. about 11 hours spread out over three days for the jury to conclude that
00:46:30
they could not agree whether Walter Zmpic the second had if he was guilty of murder and so the judge had to declare
00:46:40
this a mistrial in the case. The jury was sent home. However, Mr. Zmpic, Walter Zmpic still remained charged with
00:46:49
murder. He was free on bond but must continue to stay in the state of Ohio on electronic home monitoring. This
00:46:58
is this sucks. All right, look. I I know that there's a lot of people out there.
00:47:03
The room is probably divided right now. Shout out to the people in the back. The
00:47:07
room is probably divided on on who believes this guy might be guilty, who thinks that he he's getting railroaded
00:47:15
here, regardless of the situation. Look, if he's guilty, we really don't care. But we don't know that the the a big
00:47:24
part of this too for him, he's a business owner. He lives in a different state and he's had to remain in Ohio for
00:47:32
a very long time, years, but because this was a mistrial, not an acquitt, he was able to be
00:47:40
retrieded. Now, what takes place here behind the scenes, Captain, is the prosecuting
00:47:47
uh the prosecution, they are interviewing. This is like almost like a debriefing of the the jury, right?
00:47:54
They're they're interviewing the the jury, asking them, you know, what certain questions. And it was after
00:48:00
talking with the hung jury, they decided that they were not going to further the the case against him.
00:48:11
So they dismissed, the prosecution dismissed the case without prejudice, meaning it could
00:48:20
be refiled should additional evidence be found against Zmpic, but three years of
00:48:27
Walter Zmpik's life had been spent as an accused murderer. 18 months of that had
00:48:32
been spent in the state of Ohio. However, he was free to return to Tennessee at that time. and he says that
00:48:38
he due to the amount of time he lost his business because of the accusations against him and his time away from the
00:48:46
state of Tennessee. So, I'm guessing law enforcement at this point just thought,
00:48:50
okay, if we pursue, we don't have enough. It's been some time that has passed, but maybe if some more time
00:48:57
passed that we we'll be able to build a stronger case against him. Yeah, this is
00:49:01
one of those tough ones where you you can see maybe not just a a garage divided like I had mentioned, but maybe
00:49:09
a house divided amongst some of the law enforcement officers and even the prosecution of, you know, did is this a
00:49:16
situation where we have the guy, we know who did it, we just can't prove it in court, or is it a situation where maybe
00:49:23
they got the wrong guy? It it's the hair evidence for me that makes this all very
00:49:28
shaky, right? like if but what does that hair evidence mean? And and I and I hate
00:49:34
to be going down this road because I'm somebody that with the porch light project we
00:49:38
we DNA is the holy grail for us in in in our cases and it's and it often is telling us who is responsible for what
00:49:48
in this scenario is simply a hair found on her person. We know that her current boyfriend Craig Rup, he says they went
00:49:57
to this pond to spend some time together, his words. What What does that mean? Did they do everything except for
00:50:04
have sex that night? As he says, right? It appears that based off of the evidence that they collected in 1985
00:50:12
that she was either sexually assaulted or did have some kind of sexual had sex with somebody that evening. But what I'm
00:50:18
getting at is I do believe that there's a world where Craig Rup or somebody else
00:50:25
left that hair on her person and Walter Zmpic then later killed her. I believe that that's a possibility. I also
00:50:33
believe that there's a world where he's completely innocent and lied about where
00:50:38
he was that night because he was a dumb 18-year-old kid and and scared. What we do get is a lot of more drama in this
00:50:47
case. So nothing happens publicly after Zmpic walked on the case until let's go to
00:50:56
2014. We have Rachel Hill, Lory's older sister, and Walter Zmpik both appear on the Dr. Phil TV show. Now, a lot
00:51:06
happened. Uh I'll give you the old Colonel summary here. Of course, Rachel Hill was fully in full tilt on Zimpik's
00:51:16
guilt. Basically, it was evident that since the arrest of 2009, her rage against him had been festering inside of
00:51:24
her, and it was only heightened by them not being able to get a guilty conviction. Rachel told Dr. Phil that
00:51:31
when the relationship ran its course and Lorie moved on, Walt, she refers to him
00:51:37
as Walt, did not accept this. quote, "He was a stalker," she said. She said, "Walt gave Lori an ultimatum and then
00:51:46
she was killed." Rachel laid out the last hours of Lor's life for Dr. Phil about her going to the party, arguing
00:51:52
with her boyfriend, and being seen by neighbors, walking alone toward home. Then she went missing and Walt was a
00:51:59
crying mess, huddled in a fetal position and extreme an extreme reaction. Maybe like maybe he's overreacting on purpose.
00:52:08
Maybe he's he's he's putting on a show. Rachel told Dr. Phil that when Lori was found, the
00:52:15
damage to her sister's head and face was so bad that her father told the girl's mother that Lori had been shot. There
00:52:23
was a hole in the center of her forehead. Her right ear had been missing, been eaten by animals. The Hill
00:52:30
family never, she says the Hill family never suspected Walt back then. Rachel said that he was the best man at her
00:52:37
wedding. He spent time, he says he spent time at their house after Lori was killed, stored a car there for a period
00:52:44
of time. But she says that she began to suspect Walt in 1991. Uh that year, I guess Walt had
00:52:53
taken her uh Rachel's babysitter out on a date and Rachel walked into the room and found Walt attacking the teenage
00:53:02
girl, beating her and in her words saying trying to rape her. She says that she chased him off
00:53:08
with a shotgun and that's when the thought came to her. Well, maybe he had done the same thing to my sister. She
00:53:16
went on to tell Dr. Phil, that when police went to serve the warrant to on Walt for this incident, uh, so this
00:53:24
would be 1991, that he had photos of Lori on his walls and his bedside table. They found her
00:53:32
earring, Lor's earring that she had worn the night she was killed. It was all bent and
00:53:38
misshapen. Rachel said that it was misshaped because she had been hit while, you know, the earring was still
00:53:45
in her ear. She said that Walt told police that the family gave him this earring as some kind of momento of Lori.
00:53:53
She denies this when he says that. She told Dr. Phil that quote, "I am 100% positive that Walt is my sister's killer
00:54:01
beyond a shadow of doubt." And then she called Walter a psychopath. Earlier during the week of the Dr. Phil taping
00:54:13
for the show. Rachel admitted she had been admitted to a psychiatric hospital because she had threatened to
00:54:22
kill both Walter Zimpik and his attorney, Amber Van Gunton. I I mean, look, this is not a great way to handle
00:54:34
your problems. I can maybe reconci reconcile with the idea of going after Walter Zimpik, but I I don't
00:54:42
know that you need to threaten to kill the attorney as well, but clearly she's not in her right mind. The She did say
00:54:49
she was honest about being admitted to the psychiatric hospital. She did say the hospital they were keeping me safe
00:54:56
from hunting Amber and Walt down. Rachel said that she promised her father on his deathbed that she would kill the
00:55:05
man who killed Lori and she was determined to keep that promise. Yeah, but you have to figure out who it is
00:55:12
first. You have to figure out who it is first. And she did say that that, you know, when she was able
00:55:20
to clear her mind, clear her thoughts, she she changed her mind on wanting to carry out that promise to her father
00:55:28
because she was older. She had five granddaughters. She, you know, she had a family. She had many more reasons for
00:55:35
staying out of prison than just the one for getting even and getting that eye for an eye that her father wanted. But
00:55:43
this is I mean this is a strange and bizarre scenario, right? She's not seen the accused since the
00:55:51
trial that he that he walked away from. And now they were going to be face to face on set together. Well, this is a a
00:56:00
Dr. Phil special. This is what he does. This is what he does. Yeah. This is what
00:56:05
old Phil one day he's going to put us face to face and have it out. one last goaround. At some point, she's heard she
00:56:14
can be overheard asking Dr. Phil if his security guards were present because she
00:56:19
she wanted to make sure that if needed, they would be there to stop her from hurting Walter
00:56:25
Zimp. So, Zemp Zimp said in a pre-taped interview, you know, when they pre-taped
00:56:32
something and then later they air it on the show, he's saying in that pre-taped interview that Rachel was fixated on
00:56:39
him. He says, "I've always been in love with Lori." He maintained that he and Lori had started talking about getting
00:56:47
back together, and that night she was supposed to leave the boy that she was seeing at the time. He said, "In
00:56:54
essence, she was at the party. I was at the mall with some friends. That night, I got a call from the police around 1:30
00:57:01
a.m. asking if I had seen or heard from Lori. I said no. The next day I saw Rachel at her house and helped search
00:57:08
for Lori. He denied having any scratches on him of any sort. He said he was crushed when Lori was found dead. He he
00:57:18
did go on to tell the show, "Hey, look, I passed a polygraph exam back in 1985. Uh my DNA was tested against the DNA on
00:57:26
Lor's body. It didn't match." And while he's trying to defend himself and point out reasons why he might be innocent,
00:57:36
Rachel starts spouting off, you know, I hate you. I know you killed Lori. Rachel
00:57:42
said, "Man, this is disturbing." Rachel said that Lori when she was attacked that night and killed that Lori fought
00:57:51
so hard her knuckles were broken. Her argument was that the DNA was so disintegrated there was nothing left
00:57:59
that he could not have been cleared by DNA. He did this is this is odd because we we know he had a different stance on
00:58:07
this when interviewed in 2008. He on the show and maybe he was just trying to present himself in a certain light, a
00:58:15
bad light, but he did deny lying to the police. He said he did give two conflicting
00:58:22
stories about that night and one he just just left out the facts that he was with
00:58:27
a girl that night with the with the Sandy girl. Now, of course, Dr. Phil's not going to allow this to stand, right?
00:58:34
We we we know his his mojo. So now he's you can see him armed with the transcript from the interviews and
00:58:43
he's going to confront Walter saying like like look man in this interview you admit that you lied like so don't don't
00:58:51
sit here and tell us that you didn't lie to the police. You you admit it right here. We have your words. So Walter gets
00:58:58
all kind of shifty during this part. He's he's he's kind of denying it again. Yeah, but you can be a liar and not a
00:59:05
murderer. True. And and and in and in his defense, he has a different answer for it at this time. He's saying, "Look,
00:59:11
yes, I gave them two different stories. The only difference in my stories is that I left Sandy out. In the second
00:59:17
story in in the second story I gave them, I didn't leave Sandy out." And he he's saying now to Phil, Dr. Phil, I was
00:59:26
young. I was scared. I was nervous when I was talking to the police back in 1985. And of course, Phil's Dr. Phil's
00:59:33
going to point out, look, this this is this looks very suspicious. And and look, I can I don't like Walter in this
00:59:43
part, but I can agree with both Dr. Phil and Walter's statements when when he's confronted and and Dr. Phil pushes him
00:59:52
even further, challenges him even more. Why did you give at this point Dr. Phil is saying three different alibis? The
01:00:00
rebuttal here is that uh Walter saying, "I always said that I was at the mall." And he's and he goes on to say that the
01:00:08
the things the things that remain true to this day. I always said that I was at the mall. Number one, and number two, I
01:00:15
never saw I always said I never saw Lori on the night that she died. Walter's attorney, Amber, then points out on the
01:00:23
show to Dr. fulfilled that she speaks up and she raised a theory that has never been presented before in the case saying
01:00:31
that that it was a ritualistic killer. She said that two sticks were found on Lor's stomach in the form of an upside
01:00:38
down cross. I guess it's so out of left field here, Captain, that that during the course of the Dr. Phil episode,
01:00:44
that's not really further explored, right? There's similarities to this case and and the deli case and but when you
01:00:54
find a victim in in a wooded area or a field there are sometimes these killers decide to well maybe I can conceal the
01:01:05
body and after starting that process realize there's not enough material around them and they right or that a car
01:01:16
drives by and then they they take off. It's like the first time that somebody brought up to me with deli, they go, you
01:01:22
know, they found a found some sticks on the girls in the form of a cross or a form of something. And I said, yeah,
01:01:29
they were in the effing woods. It would be strange if they didn't find some sticks. Like uh I mean, come on here,
01:01:35
people. So, I'm not going to go through the the 1985 polygraph, but we do have the transcript of that. And and Dr. Phil
01:01:44
did as well. They brought on an expert, a polygraph expert, former FBI special agent who reviewed the
01:01:54
1985 test that Walter passed. And you know, he passed that test. The expert said, "This would be a very, very
01:02:05
difficult test for him to lie his way through and to pass. This would be a very it'd be very difficult to end up
01:02:13
with these results with the way that the test was administered with the questions
01:02:17
that were asked and for him to be deceptive but not give off the result that he was being deceptive. So
01:02:26
that I mean if you're scoring at home put one in favor of Walter here. But there was a second episode a second Dr.
01:02:34
Phil episode Dr. Phil made Rachel Hill promise to put some stock in the Polygraph results. In other words, he's
01:02:43
saying, "Hey, we're going to we're going to do another episode here, but I want you to try to keep more of an open
01:02:48
mind." And on this episode, it was very different. Uh Walter said to Rachel, "I feel sorry for you and I feel sorry for
01:02:57
your family." Rachel asked only one question. The the purpose of this second episode
01:03:04
here, Captain, was they were going to administer polygraph examinations of both Rachel and of Walter. This would be
01:03:13
Dr. Phil's team doing this. And that's why he's saying, look, you know, we know that we know that he passed the
01:03:21
polygraph in 1985. We're going to give him another one today. Hey, we're going to give you one as well, and we want you
01:03:27
to try to keep an open mind about the results that may come of this. So, what were the results? Well, this is
01:03:35
interesting because part of the the questions for Rachel centers around that babysitter incident, remember where she
01:03:43
says, "This is the light that went off after I saw him assaulting this teenage babysitter that I wondered, did he do
01:03:49
the same thing to my sister years ago?" Right? And the the examiner said that regarding that babysitter incident,
01:04:00
Rachel's statements and answers were truthful. The results were truthful. Now, the flip of that is in
01:04:08
regard to Walter Zimbeck killing Lori and all the questions that were involved for him
01:04:14
in this new updated polygraph gets the same result. He's he says he didn't kill her and he the
01:04:23
result is he's not being deceptive. Right. And in this moment and and I think look I mean sometimes it takes a
01:04:33
person to have walked in another person's shoes. And what I mean by that in this
01:04:38
this scenario is Rachel knew all along that this guy passed the 85 polygraph. But doesn't that polygraph mean a whole
01:04:48
lot more when you know something to be true and you have to sit down and give your own and then the results are in and
01:04:56
they're saying, "Yeah, cames came back that you were telling the truth about this incident that this guy didn't want
01:05:01
to admit to." In Zimpik's test, he's only asked about if he killed Lori. He's only asked if about questions pertaining
01:05:08
to the night that Lori disappeared and about uh Lor's homicide. It comes back non-deceptive. He says he didn't do it.
01:05:15
says he wasn't involved. Non-deceptive. So in this scenario, Captain Rachel seemed to immediately accept that the
01:05:21
polygraph results were in fact accurate. She began crying. She was almost hysterical. She pleaded with Walter
01:05:29
asking him questions as she's crying. Why all the lies? Why all the different stories? He said he didn't even remember
01:05:36
saying those things to police. He said he was a kid. She cried. He cried. Walter goes on to say on the show that
01:05:45
he loved Rachel's family, that he loved the Hill family, saying, "I would," quote, "I would do anything for Lori."
01:05:53
And then he approached Rachel and they hugged it out. And he says to her, "Let's go find the person who did this
01:06:00
together." Yeah. Rachel acknowledged that she has that that she has to forgive him and that she has accepted
01:06:10
that he didn't do it. But she said she hoped it was him because if it wasn't him who had killed her sister, then it
01:06:19
was a monster. And in and and back in ' 85 and in the moment that her poor sister knew that she was going to die.
01:06:27
And it doesn't end there because we fast forward two years later. The case was pretty much stone cold after the charges
01:06:35
against Walter Zimick were dropped. It was stone cold up until the Dr. Phil drama and then even after that stone
01:06:44
cold at least as the as far as the public knows. So years go by but in 2016 a man was arrested in Fulton County for
01:06:54
the murder of another young woman in a crime that seems eerily similar. And this arrest would revive Lorie Anne
01:07:05
Hills homicide case at least in the eyes of the public and especially in her family. The victim in that case was
01:07:11
Sierra Joan. The man, the local man arrested for her murder was James Dean Warley. And after Warley's arrest,
01:07:21
Rachel Hill spoke with NBC 24. She said that she believed when Zimbeck was arrested that he did in
01:07:31
fact kill Lori. But now after this new information, she believed that James Worley killed her sister Lori. Now, to
01:07:39
be perfectly clear here, Captain, this seems to be more of a gut feeling type of thing rather than Rachel having any
01:07:46
evidence of Warley's involvement or having killed her sister. This next part here is from NBC 24 says, quote, "Rachel
01:07:55
believes it was Warley who killed her sister after she saw him at his first arraignment in Fulton County."
01:08:03
She said, "The evil that oozed out of him and the bloodstained hands and the fact that he wrote with
01:08:12
his left hand is what convinced her." Rachel said she was told years ago that her sister's killer was left-handed.
01:08:21
Anyone who has any information about the murder of Laurianne Hill, please contact
01:08:26
the Toledo Police Department at 419-2453142. And if you have any information about James Dean Warley,
01:08:36
convicted murderer James Dean Warley, please call the Fulton County Sheriff's Office at
01:08:57
419335410. Want to thank everybody for joining us here in the garage each and every week. and thanks for sharing these
01:09:02
cases on social media. Colonel, do we have any recommended reading for the beautiful listeners? Absolutely,
01:09:09
Captain. This week, this one was a uh one that I think is properly handpicked by yours truly
01:09:17
because we've been getting a few requests lately for Dayton, Ohio cases. Um, and so this is by a great historic
01:09:27
true crime expert that, you know, it's one thing to cover these stories that happened 10, 20 years ago. It's one
01:09:34
thing to cover these stories that are new, fresh in the news just a few months ago, like we like we did it a week or so
01:09:42
back. All of these cases are unique, but it's incredibly difficult to go way back
01:09:48
in time and find a good deal of information and historic facts to piece together a story about an old true crime
01:09:58
story. And and Sarah Kashall does it better than most. And we've recommended some of her books previously on True
01:10:06
Crime Garage, but this week we are recommending a it's called Murder in Victorian Dayton. The tragic story of
01:10:14
Bessie Little. The murder of Bessie Little and the trial of her murderer rocked Victorian Dayton. Believing
01:10:22
herself pregnant and desperate to save her reputation, young Bessie tried to force her boyfriend to marry her
01:10:28
quickly. Instead, he took her out for a buggy ride, shot her twice in the head, and dumped her body in the river. When
01:10:35
she was discovered, he tried to convince everyone that she had committed suicide.
01:10:40
We talked about a dramatic trial this week on True Crime Garage. We talked about the drama on Dr. Phil. There was a
01:10:48
dramatic trial in this case as well. So, go out and check out this great book, Murder and Victorian Dayton: The Tragic
01:10:56
Story of Bessie Little. You don't have to write that title down now because you can go to our website true
01:11:01
crimegar.com. Click on the recommendation tab and we have podcast, documentaries, and other books
01:11:10
recommendations there for you. And until next week, be good, be kind, and don't limit.
01:11:25
[Music]

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 80
    Most heartbreaking
  • 70
    Most emotional
  • 65
    Most intense
  • 60
    Most dramatic

Episode Highlights

  • Elevated Customer Experience
    Tractor Supply and T-Mobile transform intelligent customer service with advanced 5G solutions.
    “This is elevated customer experience.”
    @ 00m 32s
    May 14, 2025
  • Welcome to True Crime Garage
    Hosts Nick and the Captain introduce the episode with humor and camaraderie.
    “Thanks for listening. Thanks for telling a friend.”
    @ 01m 26s
    May 14, 2025
  • The Case of Walter Zimpic
    Investigators revisit inconsistencies in Walter Zimpic's statements about the night of Lori's disappearance.
    “Both stories that he gives are inconsistent.”
    @ 08m 54s
    May 14, 2025
  • Walter Zmpic's Arrest
    After 8 months of investigation, Walter Zmpic was arrested in 2008 for the cold case murder.
    “Fulton County detectives announced the cold case arrest to the media.”
    @ 33m 06s
    May 14, 2025
  • Defense Claims Innocence
    Defense attorney Amber Van Gunton argues that evidence exonerates Walter Zmpic during the trial.
    “I've never been more convinced in my 10 years of law practice that this man is innocent.”
    @ 38m 03s
    May 14, 2025
  • Rachel Hill's Conviction
    Rachel Hill asserts her belief that Walter Zimpik is her sister's killer on Dr. Phil.
    “I am 100% positive that Walt is my sister's killer beyond a shadow of doubt.”
    @ 53m 58s
    May 14, 2025
  • Emotional Reunion
    Walter Zimpik and Rachel Hill share a heartfelt moment on Dr. Phil, discussing the case.
    “I would do anything for Lori.”
    @ 01h 05m 50s
    May 14, 2025
  • New Suspicions Arise
    Rachel Hill shifts her belief to a new suspect, James Warley, after his arrest.
    “Rachel believes it was Warley who killed her sister after she saw him at his first arraignment.”
    @ 01h 07m 55s
    May 14, 2025
  • Rachel's Conviction
    Rachel believes Warley killed her sister, convinced by his left-handedness.
    “She said, "The evil that oozed out of him..."”
    @ 01h 08m 03s
    May 14, 2025
  • Murder in Victorian Dayton
    A tragic story of Bessie Little, who was murdered by her boyfriend.
    “Believing herself pregnant and desperate to save her reputation...”
    @ 01h 10m 11s
    May 14, 2025

Episode Quotes

  • Let's talk some true crime.
    Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842
  • I think anybody that looks back... can say that thing was really dumb.
    Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842
  • This case is absolutely ridiculous. I don't understand why they are still pursuing charges.
    Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842
  • I am 100% positive that Walt is my sister's killer beyond a shadow of doubt.
    Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842
  • I would do anything for Lori.
    Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842
  • If it wasn't him who had killed her sister, then it was a monster.
    Killing was Purposeful /// Part 2 /// 842

Key Moments

  • Cheers to Listeners02:10
  • Inconsistent Statements09:00
  • Cold Case Arrest33:06
  • Defense Arguments34:01
  • Mistrial Declared46:36
  • Rachel's Rage51:21
  • Walter's Denial56:41
  • Murder Details1:10:31

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown