Search:

Inside Philip Polkinghorne’s Murder Trial - With Steve Braunias

July 20, 202553:51
00:00:00
Oh, good. You're here. Come on. This is
00:00:03
the center of performance. Whenever
00:00:05
there's a top performance in New
00:00:06
Zealand, it all comes from here. That's
00:00:08
Lisa Carrington. She's been doing that
00:00:10
for days. That's the boys who got the
00:00:12
hole in one in to
00:00:16
Finn. How's the performance going?
00:00:18
>> Top tier.
00:00:18
>> Nice. This is our generate room. In
00:00:21
here, you'll find our top performers
00:00:22
helping Kiwis maximize their Kiwi Saver
00:00:24
investments. Get in here, Finn.
00:00:26
>> Maximize. Generate. putting performance
00:00:29
first.
00:00:36
>> Steve Bronnius, welcome to my podcast.
00:00:38
>> Thanks so much. It was a pleasure to be
00:00:40
here. It's very flattering to be
00:00:42
invited. Thank you.
00:00:43
>> It's It's really nice to meet you. I'm
00:00:44
slightly um terrified in a way, I think.
00:00:48
>> Ease your terror.
00:00:50
>> Really?
00:00:51
>> No, because I I you probably you've done
00:00:52
you do so much writing, so you probably
00:00:54
don't even remember this. And I only
00:00:56
vaguely remember it because I think I've
00:00:58
tried to block it out. But you I have
00:00:59
been um a subject of one of your
00:01:01
columns. One of those um
00:01:03
>> Secret Diary.
00:01:04
>> Yeah, Secret Diary.
00:01:04
>> Was it the A Secret Diary of Dom Harvey
00:01:07
>> something? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I I
00:01:09
was on commercial radio for like a
00:01:10
number of years. David Bre on a station
00:01:11
called The Edge. And I would have done
00:01:13
something oish or buffoonish and I would
00:01:16
would have deserved a public bollocking
00:01:18
and um rightfully I I got one from the
00:01:19
great Steve Bronners.
00:01:20
>> I'm sure it wasn't a bollocking. It
00:01:22
might have been a gentle mocking,
00:01:25
>> but you you have been described as
00:01:27
merciless. Merciless. What um if you
00:01:30
looked up in the thesaurus, what are
00:01:31
some other words for merciless? What
00:01:32
does what does that mean?
00:01:34
>> Um
00:01:35
>> like savage.
00:01:37
>> Savage, cold, unfeilling, lacking in
00:01:40
empathy, ruthless. These are good
00:01:43
synonyms.
00:01:44
>> Is Is that fair? Are you merciless? Oh,
00:01:47
I I I yeah, I would have to acknowledge
00:01:50
that sometimes that that would be true.
00:01:53
Um yes, uh professionally
00:01:57
um that would be accurate and you know
00:02:00
there's there's often not a a great
00:02:02
distinction between your professional
00:02:03
life and your personal life as well.
00:02:06
So, um yeah, I I think that would be um
00:02:10
mainly a kind of failing
00:02:13
um as a person and as a as a writer and
00:02:17
a journalist, but sometimes it it can
00:02:19
be, you know, harnessed to good effect.
00:02:24
Um, I guess I'm one of these sort of
00:02:27
writers who um,
00:02:30
you know, I just can't resist a lot of
00:02:33
things.
00:02:35
And um, you know, I'm the sort of person
00:02:39
who will write something and think,
00:02:41
"Yep, yeah, you you you should say
00:02:44
this."
00:02:45
And then, you know, subsequently regret
00:02:48
it
00:02:48
>> and and beat myself up. So, you used to
00:02:51
think, [ __ ] that's a little bit mean,
00:02:53
but [ __ ] it. YOLO. It's funny. Send.
00:02:57
>> It's It's more of a sort of a matter of
00:03:00
is it um is it
00:03:05
does it belong to the story and is it
00:03:07
accurate to the story? And um
00:03:11
yeah, it the sort of god that I that
00:03:14
that I've that I've you know kind of
00:03:17
worshiped over the years is this idea of
00:03:20
the story. You know the story has to be
00:03:22
intact and the story has to be honest
00:03:26
and um it's often at the expense of the
00:03:29
person who writes it which is me.
00:03:33
>> Yeah. cuz there was that column I found
00:03:35
that described you as merciless but um
00:03:37
if you do a deep dive or you know I know
00:03:39
you've got a lot of fans a lot of people
00:03:40
that have probably read all your work
00:03:41
like there's some columns that you've
00:03:43
written which are like about your
00:03:45
daughter and about your personal life
00:03:46
and they're anything but they're yeah
00:03:49
they're very um you're very soft and
00:03:51
gentle. Yeah, it can be. Yeah. I mean,
00:03:54
you know, everyone is complicated,
00:03:56
right? No one is any one thing. And so I
00:03:59
don't I don't see it as any particular
00:04:01
contradiction or surprise that I should
00:04:04
you know spend a lot of time say writing
00:04:06
about murder trials and often or
00:04:09
sometimes at least quite unfeillingly
00:04:12
towards say the accused and then spend
00:04:15
you know a great deal of my writing life
00:04:17
uh writing quite sentimental columns
00:04:20
about my mom, my daughter and people who
00:04:24
I love in my life. Uh we're all like
00:04:26
that. M
00:04:29
>> yeah and the crime stuff that you're
00:04:30
talking about. So this is your latest
00:04:32
book um which was shroud in secrecy. I
00:04:35
had to sign an NDA to get a copy of this
00:04:37
in advance. Pulking horn inside the
00:04:39
trial of the century. So that's your
00:04:40
latest bit of work and I'm looking
00:04:41
forward to getting into that. Um I like
00:04:44
a lot of New Zealanders I think last
00:04:45
year during the Pulking Horn trial um
00:04:48
were had an insatable appetite for your
00:04:50
updates, your columns.
00:04:52
>> Cool. Thank you.
00:04:52
>> Yeah. Yeah. you've managed to combine
00:04:54
this um this fascination of yours with
00:04:57
um court trials along with um like a
00:05:00
career in writing um which is masterful.
00:05:03
>> Oh, thank you. I don't know about that,
00:05:06
but thank you.
00:05:07
>> No, no, to to get paid to do what you
00:05:09
love. I think anyone that can sort of um
00:05:11
get that one over the line is done well
00:05:13
>> because you're not like a court reporter
00:05:14
per se. It's like um in a sort of an
00:05:16
opinion piece or an observational piece.
00:05:19
>> Yeah. Yeah. There there are daily court
00:05:21
reporters who do a really thorough and
00:05:24
you know superb job of sort of
00:05:26
summarizing the day's events.
00:05:29
It's hard work too. It's real hard work.
00:05:31
You got to think fast. Uh you've got to
00:05:34
take all sorts of things into
00:05:35
consideration and the people who do it
00:05:37
and do it really well I tip my hat to.
00:05:40
Um that's not what I do. I I guess they
00:05:43
are sort of interpretive. Um I was
00:05:46
always uh I was just sort of interested
00:05:48
in the idea of um
00:05:52
attending a tri a trial and making some
00:05:55
kind of literature out of it.
00:05:58
>> So the Pokemon trial did you did you
00:06:00
attend every single day?
00:06:02
>> Yeah.
00:06:03
>> Yeah. Right. Right. Right.
00:06:04
>> So So you were there so everything the
00:06:06
jurors heard you heard?
00:06:09
>> Yes. Um
00:06:11
yes that's true. And um I think it's the
00:06:16
I may be wrong in in thinking this but I
00:06:18
think it was the first trial
00:06:21
uh that I attended where I was writing
00:06:24
every single day of that trial. And so
00:06:28
typically,
00:06:30
you know, uh the trial would finish at 4
00:06:32
or sometimes early at 4:00 or or or 5.
00:06:35
Either way, I would um catch the bus
00:06:40
home.
00:06:42
don't drive.
00:06:44
And um start writing the story on my
00:06:47
phone with with one finger, not very
00:06:50
good at thumbs.
00:06:52
And I would write the story real fast on
00:06:56
my phone. Uh the speed was partly
00:06:59
because after being a day in court, your
00:07:02
phone wears down. I was never clever
00:07:04
enough to take a a charger. I don't have
00:07:07
a laptop. I just took in a notebook and
00:07:09
a pen. And so anyway, the charge was
00:07:12
getting down to like 5% 2% kind of
00:07:15
thing, you know, and so you had to write
00:07:17
it and continue keep saving it, keep
00:07:20
saving it and file to the newspaper uh
00:07:23
pretty much by the time I got home on
00:07:25
the bus
00:07:26
>> every day. And uh it was it was,
00:07:30
you know, it was it was a very exciting
00:07:32
thing to do, you know, to try and create
00:07:34
this kind of tension
00:07:37
which is already there on the trial.
00:07:40
Every day was tense. Every day was um
00:07:44
every day was really interesting. You
00:07:46
never knew how it was going to turn out
00:07:49
in the end and you never knew what each
00:07:52
day was going to uh unfold and what the
00:07:54
arguments would be and also what you
00:07:57
never knew quite what you felt about it.
00:07:59
You know, um you can't help yourself.
00:08:02
You go there as a journalist. Um you're
00:08:06
not on the jury. You're not a
00:08:07
prosecutor. You're not you're not the
00:08:09
defense. and you're certainly not the
00:08:10
judge.
00:08:12
And you know, your your mind, well, my
00:08:15
mind anyway, kept changing throughout
00:08:17
the trial. Uh like, you know, you'd hear
00:08:19
a devastating day by the prosecution and
00:08:22
you go, "Oh my god, this appalling. He's
00:08:26
clearly guilty. This is terrible. He did
00:08:30
what they said he did." And then other
00:08:32
days the defense would tear it apart,
00:08:35
tear it down, which they often did. And
00:08:38
you go, "Hang on a minute." You know,
00:08:41
reasonable doubt has been more than
00:08:43
established here. Let that man go.
00:08:46
>> And that was the latter, wasn't it, for
00:08:48
the jury?
00:08:49
>> Is is that what attracts you to court
00:08:52
cases in general? Just the drama of it.
00:08:55
>> What is it?
00:08:56
>> Yeah.
00:08:59
Well, um
00:09:02
it's what gets said in a room
00:09:07
about something which is,
00:09:10
you know, happened usually very fast. It
00:09:15
doesn't take long to kill someone or for
00:09:18
someone to be killed by their own hand
00:09:20
if that's the case.
00:09:22
And it's this um intense recreation of
00:09:27
something which has possibly only taken
00:09:29
a couple of minutes to achieve.
00:09:33
And um it's this huge test of character,
00:09:38
>> you know, and um
00:09:41
>> with the highest stakes imaginable.
00:09:43
>> Such high stakes. Um
00:09:46
it's the character of the accused and is
00:09:49
also the sort of associated tragedies of
00:09:52
the accused family and the families of
00:09:56
the alleged you know victim.
00:10:00
>> And um
00:10:02
I think the time I I I realized I I I
00:10:05
the first time I felt this most
00:10:07
intensely about the families and their
00:10:10
predicament.
00:10:11
It wasn't a murder trial. I I I
00:10:14
sometimes make a point of going to the
00:10:16
most seemingly boring trial that there
00:10:19
is. Uh a trial where no one from the
00:10:23
press wants to go to. And you know,
00:10:26
perhaps no one wants to read about. To
00:10:28
me, that's fascinating. But why not?
00:10:32
It's the same thing somebody whose life
00:10:34
or freedom or liberty is on the line. It
00:10:37
was a um it was a methamphetamine
00:10:41
possession trial. media avoided it like
00:10:44
the plague went on and on and I couldn't
00:10:47
tear myself away, you know, like at the
00:10:49
end of every day I go, "Don't go back
00:10:52
and I'd be there at 10:00 a.m. the next
00:10:54
day."
00:10:56
And it was a it was an Iranian fella.
00:11:00
It was all a fast. After the jury
00:11:04
found him guilty, he he and between that
00:11:09
and sentencing, he he he acknowledged
00:11:13
>> his guilt. Um
00:11:17
it was all a fast really, but it took
00:11:19
forever. And and the point I'm trying to
00:11:21
make is that there was barely anyone in
00:11:23
the public gallery too, you know, which
00:11:25
again makes it more interesting like why
00:11:27
is everyone avoiding this? Why is there
00:11:29
a vacuum here? And it gives it a certain
00:11:32
kind of poignency and a tragedy that no
00:11:35
one cares,
00:11:38
you know. Uh, pretty much the only
00:11:40
people in the courtroom that I remember
00:11:42
was this Iranian fella's wife and child,
00:11:48
very young kid, beautiful looking boy,
00:11:51
gorgeous looking fella with big eyes. He
00:11:53
was about three, I think.
00:11:55
>> Used to play with him sometimes.
00:11:57
And um I remember thinking that um
00:12:01
the wife who came out of you know a
00:12:03
terrific sort of loyalty to her husband
00:12:07
uh I remember thinking of her as like a
00:12:10
uh a balloon
00:12:14
and the string was the trial. You know
00:12:16
she had a place in this trial that she
00:12:19
was attached to it and then she came to
00:12:22
realize that she was totally irrelevant
00:12:24
actually. It was all being performed
00:12:27
without her and you just sort of saw her
00:12:30
or sensed her float to the top of the
00:12:32
room. She was unnecessary and it was so
00:12:35
incredibly sad to see and um and you see
00:12:38
that you know uh the frustrations of
00:12:42
family
00:12:43
uh particularly of of of the alleged
00:12:45
victim and murder trials. You know,
00:12:47
they're so frustrated they can't say
00:12:49
anything. They can't do anything. they
00:12:52
just have to let it pass in front of
00:12:54
them while they float around this
00:12:56
courtroom having no sort of corporeal
00:12:59
existence.
00:13:00
>> Um so yeah, that sort of thing is is
00:13:02
terribly sad. The poignency of it is is
00:13:05
is attractive.
00:13:07
Um
00:13:09
and it all takes part it all takes place
00:13:12
in one room for you to observe and to
00:13:16
listen and to watch.
00:13:20
>> So Dr. Philip Pulking Horn. Um,
00:13:23
>> did you like him? Would you say your
00:13:24
mates?
00:13:26
>> I did like him. Yeah. Um, I did like
00:13:30
him. We We It was highly unusual. You
00:13:32
know, the accused in these cases
00:13:35
normally sort of sequestered away behind
00:13:37
glass. And Philip had the run of the
00:13:40
courtroom. He took up a whole expensive
00:13:42
row of real estate to himself in the
00:13:45
courtroom. And so he was very
00:13:46
accessible. And you'd go in the morning
00:13:49
and each day and go, "Morn, Phil."
00:13:53
Have a chat during the daytime at
00:13:55
recesses. Um,
00:13:57
>> about what?
00:13:59
>> Often it was small talk. Sometimes it
00:14:01
was big talk. I suppose he um I remember
00:14:05
he he he he said at one quite crucial
00:14:08
point, it was a bad day for Phil that
00:14:10
day. Uh the prosecution were banging
00:14:14
this drum of his um of his uh enjoyment
00:14:18
of sex workers and it made him look
00:14:21
super bad. You know,
00:14:25
Phil failed the test of character in
00:14:27
that trial, didn't he? Nobody liked him.
00:14:29
>> Pretty sure the jury didn't like him.
00:14:34
>> But it was uh it was this huge sort of
00:14:37
character assassination. And of course,
00:14:39
it had a point to the prosecution. And
00:14:41
they were they were tying it to to the
00:14:43
killing
00:14:45
to the death rather of Pauline Hannah
00:14:48
his wife.
00:14:52
But often it did seem kind of
00:14:54
sensationalist. It seemed very tabloid
00:14:57
and it seemed irrelevant and unconnected
00:14:59
to what had happened that night.
00:15:02
And that one one of those particular
00:15:04
days he was seething with rage and and
00:15:08
you know as we put on our coats it was
00:15:10
winter time to leave he was putting on
00:15:13
his coat and I said bye Phil see you
00:15:15
tomorrow and he said come over here you
00:15:18
know I said you all right he said no I'm
00:15:21
disgusted you know
00:15:24
shocking day shocking day and then he
00:15:25
said you wait you wait till the science
00:15:28
you wait till we bring out science
00:15:30
science.
00:15:32
I thought, "Yeah, sure. I'll wait."
00:15:35
Um, but he was right. It was the science
00:15:37
which um surely liberated him.
00:15:41
>> Did Did he read your columns? Like when
00:15:43
you called him what did you call him? A
00:15:44
like a malignant malignant malignant sex
00:15:47
dwarf.
00:15:48
>> Yes, that's that's the one.
00:15:50
>> It's a hell of a line. Did he like does
00:15:52
he pull you aside and say, "Hey, Steve,
00:15:54
that was a little uncharitable." Or
00:15:57
>> do you do you write something like that
00:15:58
and think that's a great line, send? And
00:16:00
then the next day you're like, "Oh my
00:16:01
god, these are the guy I wrote it
00:16:02
about."
00:16:03
>> Yeah. Every day. Every day of my
00:16:05
professional life. Dom, you've summed it
00:16:08
up. Um,
00:16:12
yeah. Malignant sex dwarf. Um, I I don't
00:16:16
think he did read them. Um,
00:16:18
pretty sure that Ron Mansfield, his his
00:16:21
his brilliant defense lawyer, who, you
00:16:24
know,
00:16:26
constantly will say, "I don't read my
00:16:29
press. I'm pretty sure he was reading
00:16:30
them
00:16:31
>> every day. Uh there would be the
00:16:33
occasional time I'd refer to his
00:16:35
expanding waistline and he would come in
00:16:38
in the morning and pat his tum and glare
00:16:40
at me.
00:16:43
>> Yeah. The book just the observations in
00:16:45
your book like talking about um Pulking
00:16:47
Horn's lawyer, Ron Ron Mansfield. talk
00:16:49
about his the the shape of his teeth and
00:16:50
how that that little and how how he eats
00:16:52
Royal Gala apples and just these little
00:16:55
nuances, a little behind the scenes that
00:16:56
no one else would potentially notice,
00:16:58
but you do. And I suppose that's one of
00:17:00
your strengths.
00:17:01
>> Yeah. It's not part of the normal court
00:17:02
record, is it? Yeah. Yeah. Um Yeah. I
00:17:06
mean, the closest I I I did perform uh
00:17:09
the role of a daily court reporter years
00:17:12
and years ago. Uh, I I was lucky enough
00:17:15
to get a job at the Greymouth Evening
00:17:18
Star and they wanted me as a court
00:17:21
reporter, which I'd never done before,
00:17:22
never been into a courtroom.
00:17:25
And um,
00:17:28
you know, it it it it was a kind of at
00:17:31
least a good grounding for the kind of
00:17:33
writing that I was to do many many years
00:17:36
later, decades later really.
00:17:39
Um, and it was uh it was it was so
00:17:47
I didn't really do anything about courts
00:17:49
until 2005.
00:17:53
So from like 1985
00:17:55
to 2005, 20 year absence really. And
00:17:59
what got me back into it was the Anthony
00:18:01
Dixon murder trials with the guy with
00:18:03
the samurai sword
00:18:05
>> who people always forget, you know, he
00:18:07
wasn't on trial for the samurai sword.
00:18:09
He was really he was on trial for
00:18:12
picking up a uh a machine gun, I think,
00:18:17
something like that. and and shooting a
00:18:20
guy who had never met before in a
00:18:22
service station just cuz
00:18:26
I mean he did go at and attempt to
00:18:29
murder two women with this sword but
00:18:33
yeah there was a 20-year gap in between
00:18:36
and um I was you know I found court
00:18:39
really interesting as a young guy and
00:18:42
Greymouth and Greymouth kept you pretty
00:18:44
busy as a court reporter you know there
00:18:47
was lots of things going on. Assault was
00:18:51
the main thing.
00:18:53
Um,
00:18:55
yeah, it was like it was like, you know,
00:18:58
it's a pretty small town. You know, it
00:19:00
should really the court really by rights
00:19:03
should only been sitting two to three
00:19:04
days a week, but it was full every day.
00:19:08
You know, Greybar's got a particular
00:19:10
sort of set of circumstances which is
00:19:13
going to lead to the district court
00:19:14
being real busy every day. Um but yeah,
00:19:18
I didn't write about um the shape of
00:19:21
people's of courtroom lawyers teeth and
00:19:24
the way that they tore into gala apples
00:19:26
as a metaphor for the way that they uh
00:19:29
approached trial work back then. That's
00:19:32
for sure.
00:19:35
>> I suppose that comes with um you earn
00:19:38
that right over the years with the
00:19:40
experience.
00:19:42
>> I don't know. What do you think?
00:19:43
>> H
00:19:45
[Music]
00:19:47
I don't know. I I I I never looked at it
00:19:50
that way. It was um
00:19:52
>> I mean, as a junior reporter, they're
00:19:54
going to be like, "Brawnous, go back to
00:19:56
your typewriter."
00:19:57
>> Yeah.
00:19:57
>> No one cares about the the type of apple
00:19:59
it is.
00:20:00
>> Yeah. True, true. They would have if I'd
00:20:02
attempted to write something like that.
00:20:04
Um I don't know. I mean, it's always
00:20:07
seemed like a um it always just seemed
00:20:10
like a good idea
00:20:11
>> to to when I eventually did start to
00:20:14
write that way about courtroom trials,
00:20:15
it seemed like a good idea to attempt to
00:20:18
write some kind of literature
00:20:21
um about them. You know, one one thing I
00:20:23
learned from that um experience in
00:20:27
Greymouth
00:20:29
is that when there was a particularly
00:20:31
interesting um case in Greymouth,
00:20:36
I never had to buy a drink.
00:20:40
>> Go to the Golden Eagle pub after work
00:20:43
and people, "Oh my god, Bronnius, have a
00:20:45
beer. Tell me what happened today. What
00:20:48
happened?"
00:20:50
And um people were fascinated, you know,
00:20:53
and of course that was kind of writ
00:20:56
slightly larger really during the
00:20:57
pulking horn trial, you know. I'd be I'd
00:21:00
get off the bus still typing on my phone
00:21:03
as it got down to 1%.
00:21:05
>> And people be coming up to you between
00:21:07
the bus and my house going, "What
00:21:08
happened? What was it like? What
00:21:10
happened? What did you think? What are
00:21:11
you writing?" Well, I'm writing it now.
00:21:13
Leave me alone.
00:21:14
>> You get her on premium. You'll read it
00:21:16
tomorrow.
00:21:18
>> That's right. But yeah, it was that
00:21:19
similar sort of um
00:21:23
it was that similar sort of thing. This
00:21:25
this you know pretty
00:21:28
I've always thought that that the
00:21:29
fascination that people have with with
00:21:31
with trials that I've covered. Um yeah,
00:21:35
there's an element of of vulturism.
00:21:38
Yeah, there's a a small element of
00:21:41
voyerism, but really I I think it's a
00:21:44
totally excusable and tolerable human
00:21:47
emotion. uh almost a decent one, you
00:21:50
know.
00:21:51
>> Um
00:21:53
>> I thought that particularly during the
00:21:54
Grace Mlain trial
00:21:56
>> and the way that people were interested
00:21:58
in that, it wasn't anything dark or like
00:22:01
a dark tourism.
00:22:03
>> I don't think there was any nasty in our
00:22:06
great interest in that trial. I think it
00:22:08
was out of a a common sort of decency
00:22:11
that we uh you know even before we
00:22:14
learned that Grace had been killed,
00:22:17
>> Grace was missing. Do you remember that,
00:22:19
Dom?
00:22:19
>> Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. I I think
00:22:21
everyone could sort of feel like they
00:22:23
knew a Grace or there was a huge amount
00:22:25
of empathy in an outpouring for David
00:22:27
and Jillian.
00:22:28
>> Yeah. Yeah. And you know what I'm I'm
00:22:32
trying to remember the exact days. I
00:22:34
think there were maybe three days
00:22:36
>> of this sudden announcement. Grace is
00:22:38
missing
00:22:39
>> and and it kind of
00:22:42
>> seized the nation with this longing to
00:22:44
find her. Where is she?
00:22:49
And for it to end like that in this like
00:22:51
really appalling way with the suitcase.
00:22:56
Um
00:22:58
people were so devastated by that and
00:23:01
they followed the trial out of this sort
00:23:03
of
00:23:04
>> huge warmth and suffering that they felt
00:23:08
for for grace.
00:23:10
So yeah, a long way from any kind of um
00:23:13
gaining some dark thrill with pulking
00:23:17
horn. Um that was a different thing.
00:23:20
That was not the same feeling at all.
00:23:23
Um there was I mean this is an
00:23:28
extraordinary sort of thing to say I
00:23:30
suppose Dom but the sense that I picked
00:23:33
up of people constantly coming up to me
00:23:38
during that what was it eight weeks
00:23:40
>> and talking to me or getting hold of me
00:23:42
by email and stuff. Uh
00:23:46
well the word I would use for it was
00:23:48
happiness.
00:23:50
I think it I think there was
00:23:52
>> some sort of entertainment.
00:23:54
>> Hate to use that word.
00:23:55
>> Yeah, I know. It's it it it doesn't seem
00:24:00
apt, does it? Neither does the word
00:24:01
happiness.
00:24:02
>> Um I think it was more than
00:24:04
entertainment. I do think it was a it
00:24:06
was a sort of a happiness. It was a uh
00:24:08
it was a hard winter.
00:24:11
>> Uh the recession was coming in. The cost
00:24:14
of living was this huge remains. But it
00:24:17
first became this huge issue. you know,
00:24:19
everyone was feeling a pinch and along
00:24:22
comes this thing and you know, when
00:24:25
people would come up to me, it wasn't
00:24:27
with a furrowed brow. It was with a huge
00:24:30
grin,
00:24:31
>> you know. Um, and it wasn't about
00:24:34
obviously, you know, the murder of
00:24:36
Pauline, and it wasn't a matter of
00:24:38
taking any kind of delight that Pauline
00:24:41
had died. It was a a delight in the um
00:24:46
the private life
00:24:48
of this guy being revealed in in such
00:24:52
sort of
00:24:54
excruciating and sorted detail.
00:24:59
>> Yeah. I suppose it just highlights that
00:25:01
no one's perfect. Like we've all got
00:25:02
like dirty laundry, don't we? Um and
00:25:04
none of us would want all our dirty
00:25:06
laundry like every last garment exposed.
00:25:08
And that's exactly what
00:25:09
>> Is this our opportunity? Do are you go
00:25:14
But did did do do you think as someone
00:25:15
that was there um for every moment of
00:25:18
every day, did the jury get it right?
00:25:22
>> If you if you were a juror,
00:25:25
>> good jury, by the way,
00:25:28
>> what makes a good jury?
00:25:29
>> They were they concentrated. They were
00:25:31
attentive.
00:25:34
at least um
00:25:38
at least 11 of them.
00:25:41
>> 11 out of 12 ain't bad.
00:25:43
>> Pardon?
00:25:44
>> 11 out of 12 isn't bad.
00:25:45
>> It's it's pretty darn good really. You
00:25:49
know, the amount of juries you see and
00:25:51
it's not an indictment on them. I mean,
00:25:53
it's boring a lot of the time. from a
00:25:56
murder trial. These arguments between
00:25:58
prosecution, defense over some sort of
00:26:01
very small point which is not germanine
00:26:05
or relevant.
00:26:07
Um so yeah, a lot of a lot of
00:26:11
a great number of people on juries are
00:26:14
constantly visibly bored out of their
00:26:16
tree. Not this one. Not this one. This
00:26:20
one.
00:26:23
Same with the melain actually. I mean
00:26:25
that was that was impossible for them to
00:26:27
be bored by that. But the amount of
00:26:30
writing that I saw them uh do in the
00:26:33
Malay trial, man, that's that they must
00:26:36
have written
00:26:40
>> honestly at a guess 700,000 words.
00:26:43
>> Wow.
00:26:45
Well, to put that in perspective, your
00:26:46
new book, that's what 80,000
00:26:49
>> I think. Yeah, it's about 80 to 90, I
00:26:50
think. Yeah. Um and that Yeah.
00:26:54
the jury on that one. Sorry, your
00:26:56
question was, did they get it right? And
00:26:58
I'm sorry not to answer that directly.
00:27:00
The answer would be yes,
00:27:03
>> as in
00:27:04
what they were presented with. Um, yeah,
00:27:09
they they they
00:27:12
I mean, they did that really fascinating
00:27:14
thing at the end where they handed in
00:27:16
the note to the judge.
00:27:20
You know, it's always interesting when a
00:27:22
jury does that. you know, they get sent
00:27:24
out to deliberate and they very often
00:27:26
will will um is this this this custom
00:27:29
dom. It's it's kind of it's often kind
00:27:33
of terrifying.
00:27:35
The jury gets sent out and when they are
00:27:38
either ready with their verdict or they
00:27:41
want to ask a question, they knock on
00:27:44
the door that they're behind. This knock
00:27:47
and it can be so frightening. Oh my god,
00:27:51
it's it's going to happen. We're about
00:27:53
to find out this person is either going
00:27:55
to go away or they're not.
00:27:59
And it's so frightening. And you think
00:28:00
back to the death of the person and the
00:28:03
families involved and you know, word
00:28:07
goes around the court, calls are made,
00:28:09
texts, everyone sort of swarms back to
00:28:12
court
00:28:14
and and you see them come back to court
00:28:17
as families and they can barely breathe.
00:28:23
You know,
00:28:24
>> I remember it was like that at
00:28:26
nighttime.
00:28:28
It was a nighttime verdict. If I pretty
00:28:31
sure I'm accurate in remembering this,
00:28:32
it was a nighttime verdict.
00:28:35
Uh this is a very unpleasant trial, the
00:28:38
Louise Nicholas trial, Clinton
00:28:41
Rickard's,
00:28:43
Brad Shipp, Grant Scholam, all accused
00:28:46
of rape as senior police officers.
00:28:50
And yeah, the jury, the knock came in
00:28:52
and you know, if you just happen to be
00:28:55
sitting in court at that time like doing
00:28:59
stuff and you're there to hear the
00:29:00
knock, so frightening.
00:29:03
>> And yeah, sorry. I I I heard them. I
00:29:06
heard the knock
00:29:08
uh in the Pulking Horn trial
00:29:11
both times, one for the note and one for
00:29:13
the verdict.
00:29:15
and the note. Getting back to that, they
00:29:17
knocked on the door to say that they had
00:29:19
a note. So, you all converge.
00:29:22
It's just the note is there's not this
00:29:24
feeling of tension in the air, but a
00:29:26
little bit of it. It's like, what do
00:29:27
they what's their question? What what
00:29:29
they got? Sometimes it's it's of no
00:29:32
consequence.
00:29:34
This one was very consequential.
00:29:37
They they they had a note and it said,
00:29:41
"Some of us do not believe there is
00:29:45
enough proof
00:29:48
that this was a suicide.
00:29:52
Equally, some of us do not think there
00:29:54
is enough proof for a verdict of murder.
00:29:58
What do we do?" And it was this like
00:30:01
kind of gnomic question.
00:30:05
Oh.
00:30:07
So she didn't kill herself. Ergo, she
00:30:10
must have been killed would be the
00:30:11
logical
00:30:14
>> reading of it. But it wasn't like that.
00:30:15
It was like we don't believe in
00:30:17
anything.
00:30:19
And the judge did what the judge had to
00:30:22
do, which was like, we're not here to um
00:30:26
rule on a suicide. We're here to rule on
00:30:28
a murder. If you don't think there's
00:30:30
enough proof
00:30:32
for a murder, then
00:30:34
you kind of got your verdict. And yeah,
00:30:36
they came back not not too long after,
00:30:39
maybe it was the next day, I'm not sure.
00:30:43
And they said not guilty. So yeah, they
00:30:44
they they they got it right. There
00:30:46
wasn't there wasn't enough proof. The um
00:30:49
and Pulking Horns, you know, comment,
00:30:52
very angry comment to me one day early
00:30:54
in the trial about you wait, you wait
00:30:56
for our science. He got it. He got it.
00:30:58
He hit the nail on the head. He was
00:31:00
totally right. When the defense began
00:31:03
their their defense of uh Dr. Philip
00:31:07
Pulkinghorn, they called in two forensic
00:31:09
pathologists who both said with great
00:31:13
resolution and conviction. There is no
00:31:16
evidence
00:31:18
to suggest that this was that she had
00:31:21
been hanged.
00:31:24
>> And they were so persuasive. They were
00:31:27
so unmovable.
00:31:29
They did not equivocate in
00:31:31
cross-examination from the prosecution.
00:31:35
They held to that ground.
00:31:37
And it was like, wow. You could just
00:31:39
feel like the whole sort of circus tent
00:31:42
collapsing. The show was over.
00:31:45
>> Uh, you know,
00:31:47
accuse somebody of murder, the murderer,
00:31:50
the accused says, "Prove it."
00:31:53
>> That's it. That's it in a nutshell.
00:31:55
>> That's the criminal justice system.
00:31:57
Prove it. you um yeah, you don't have to
00:32:00
answer this. Uh but you can if you want.
00:32:02
Do do you think uh Dr. Pulking Hall is
00:32:04
responsible for the death of Pauline
00:32:06
Hannah?
00:32:07
>> Uh it's the it's the one question to ask
00:32:09
and of course you should ask it. And um
00:32:12
I've got a disappointing answer. I I was
00:32:15
I was open to it
00:32:18
>> when I entered the trial.
00:32:22
Still open to it.
00:32:24
>> Um I don't know is the answer.
00:32:27
No, no, I only only one person does.
00:32:31
>> Yeah. Yeah. I Yeah,
00:32:35
>> I I should be able to, you know, come
00:32:37
down on one side or another. I honestly
00:32:39
should, but um
00:32:42
it just wouldn't be accurate.
00:32:44
>> I don't know.
00:32:46
>> Getting
00:32:46
>> I don't know what I think.
00:32:47
>> Yeah.
00:32:48
>> Yeah.
00:32:50
H getting to know him the way you did
00:32:52
through the 8week trial, like how did
00:32:55
you feel in in the leadup to the verdict
00:32:56
then when the verdict was was read out?
00:32:58
Was it like a a sense of relief? Um a
00:33:02
sense of rage, indifference?
00:33:05
>> I like your last word. Um it was closest
00:33:08
to it was closest to indifference.
00:33:12
>> Um it wasn't exactly that. It was
00:33:15
closely related to that. It was um
00:33:21
was a kind of emptiness,
00:33:25
you know.
00:33:26
>> It was
00:33:28
all that for for for this. Um it was
00:33:33
sad.
00:33:35
>> It was sad on so many levels. It was,
00:33:40
you know,
00:33:42
one of the one of the first sort of sad
00:33:44
consequences of it was that um you had
00:33:46
to then
00:33:49
accept by that verdict that it it's like
00:33:53
turning the jury's note around. Oh, if
00:33:56
she hadn't been killed, then she must
00:33:58
have ended her own life. That's what
00:34:00
you're saying to me, isn't it?
00:34:02
>> And that was sad to to to entertain that
00:34:05
possibility. Mhm.
00:34:06
>> Um it was really sad for Pauline's
00:34:10
family. I um really more than Phil. Um I
00:34:15
really like Bruce who was Pauline's
00:34:18
sister. Pauline's brother, Bruce Hannah.
00:34:22
Hell of a nice guy. Fair dinkham. Kiwi
00:34:26
guy.
00:34:28
um straight up, honest,
00:34:31
>> warm,
00:34:33
devastated,
00:34:35
you know, really liked him. I really
00:34:37
liked um her best friend who came to the
00:34:40
trial most days, if not every day. Um
00:34:43
Feeasant Reedan, lovely woman.
00:34:47
Um
00:34:49
there's a uh
00:34:51
Did you watch the documentary?
00:34:54
>> Yes.
00:34:54
>> Yeah.
00:34:55
>> Yeah. The one with the the private eye.
00:34:57
and the and the the nothing phone call
00:35:01
which I'm you reference in the book like
00:35:03
she had a phone call from a woman a
00:35:04
couple of months before that said I
00:35:05
think my husband's cheating and then
00:35:06
hung up and there was no she thinks it
00:35:08
may have been Pauline but she's not
00:35:10
really sure
00:35:11
>> yeah what a
00:35:12
>> I'm pleased you highlighted that in your
00:35:13
book because it's like what is that
00:35:16
>> yeah what is that exactly what a what a
00:35:19
nonsense um yeah no the reason I
00:35:23
mentioned the documentary which was
00:35:24
otherwise um other other than her the
00:35:28
privateized non-involvement and vain
00:35:31
parading of herself throughout the show
00:35:33
was otherwise really excellent uh quite
00:35:36
meticulous
00:35:38
um and it was true to the trial too
00:35:41
which is what what what I hope the book
00:35:42
is Dom is true to the trial in as much I
00:35:46
I I hope my book and I think the
00:35:47
documentary were true to the spirit of
00:35:50
the trial and its and its its wildness
00:35:54
you know
00:35:55
>> the the documentary century. Um,
00:36:00
you know, it it's it's wildly
00:36:02
entertaining. It's got this incredible
00:36:05
interview with um woman who we haven't
00:36:09
mentioned yet, which is Madison Ashton,
00:36:11
>> who just, you know, it's it's it's real
00:36:15
life stuff. It's true crime to to to
00:36:18
coin that that unfortunate phrase. Um,
00:36:21
Madison steals the show. She's so
00:36:23
watchable. She's so funny. She's so
00:36:26
vivid.
00:36:28
Um,
00:36:30
and indeed she uh, you know, she gives a
00:36:33
long interview in my book and
00:36:37
you know, her answers uh, the way she
00:36:39
spoke so great. She's so clever.
00:36:43
Honestly, you know, I'd love to be able
00:36:45
to talk like that. She she talks like a
00:36:48
writer. These perfectly formed
00:36:50
sentences.
00:36:51
>> She's really interesting. Um
00:36:56
yeah. Uh uh
00:37:01
>> you can see why he was charmed by her,
00:37:03
can't you?
00:37:04
>> Oh yes. Yeah.
00:37:06
>> Yeah. Yeah. You can um you know she
00:37:13
deserved better. You know, she's a
00:37:16
lovely person. Got a lot to give. she
00:37:18
deserved a uh a really good solid loving
00:37:24
relationship, you know, as much as
00:37:26
anybody does really. Um, and I think
00:37:29
that was um
00:37:32
that that became a huge issue in the
00:37:34
trial because she felt that the cops she
00:37:37
was going to be called as a witness for
00:37:38
the prosecution and it may well have
00:37:41
been she didn't appear.
00:37:44
Had she appeared, it may well have been
00:37:46
really devastating and it may well have
00:37:49
got the guilty verdict over the line.
00:37:52
>> She didn't appear because she felt the
00:37:54
cops disrespected her and that they
00:37:56
didn't look upon um the fact that she
00:37:59
had a relationship with Pulking Horn
00:38:01
with any uh with any kind of they didn't
00:38:04
acknowledge it was her feeling. you
00:38:06
know, they just regarded her as a sex
00:38:09
worker, which is her occupation.
00:38:13
But her her whole relationship with
00:38:16
Pulking had sort of evolved from him
00:38:19
being a client of of hers
00:38:23
um to them, you know, having a de facto
00:38:27
relationship.
00:38:28
>> And she felt as though the cops never
00:38:29
acknowledged that. And she felt really
00:38:31
angry about that. And she flipped them
00:38:34
the bird and said, "I'm not coming. I'm
00:38:36
not attending your stupid trial. And uh
00:38:39
it could have been really crucial. We
00:38:42
don't know.
00:38:43
>> Yeah, we'll never know. Um the last
00:38:46
chapter of your book uh chapter 13, it's
00:38:48
called At Home with Pulking Horn. So
00:38:50
this um I found this riveting. It
00:38:53
doesn't paint him as a very nice man.
00:38:57
Yeah, just in terms in terms of how he's
00:38:59
still denies using meth, blaming it on
00:39:01
Pauline, just being really uncharitable
00:39:03
to this woman he supposedly loved after
00:39:05
her death, whether it was at his hands
00:39:07
or otherwise. Um,
00:39:10
>> uh, Madison referring to her as
00:39:12
basically like a work colleague and a
00:39:15
professional relationship gone wrong.
00:39:17
>> Um,
00:39:19
just turning himself into a victim for
00:39:21
the way the police put him in a car and
00:39:23
locked him in there for 15 minutes with
00:39:24
his own thoughts.
00:39:25
>> Mhm. Um, yeah, he does like regardless
00:39:29
of what you think about the trial,
00:39:30
whether he got away with murder or
00:39:31
didn't, he he doesn't seem like a very
00:39:33
nice man.
00:39:34
>> Yeah, that that that that was the the
00:39:36
heavy sigh I gave before, Dom. It wasn't
00:39:40
wasn't at you raising it at all. It was
00:39:43
an acknowledgment that what you're
00:39:44
saying is quite right. Um,
00:39:49
I mean, you know, silly old Phil he does
00:39:52
have a at the very least, you know, he
00:39:56
does have a terrible unpleasantness to
00:39:59
him. And for for him to say those things
00:40:02
and the way he said them,
00:40:04
you know, about about people, I thought
00:40:07
that's not right. You know, even down
00:40:10
well, not even down, but including the
00:40:12
um who's he's so steadfast
00:40:16
in denying that he possessed the
00:40:20
methamphetamine, you know, which he
00:40:22
pleaded guilty to at the outset of the
00:40:24
trial. And his explanation for that was
00:40:26
that the defense, his own lawyers said,
00:40:28
"Well, look, you should we advise you to
00:40:31
do that. It's just going to be another
00:40:33
can of worms."
00:40:36
>> He said, "Oh, well, you know, I'll do
00:40:37
it, but it wasn't mine." And you know,
00:40:41
at sentencing, the judge is like
00:40:43
something like, "Oh, look, you know,
00:40:44
you're still denying that." You know, I
00:40:47
mean, he didn't say this, but basically
00:40:49
the judge said, "Ah, [ __ ] you. M
00:40:52
>> you know
00:40:53
>> you're going down for that cuz he
00:40:54
pleaded guilty to it. That's why he
00:40:56
reappeared at sentencing. It wasn't for
00:40:58
Pauline's death. It was for the
00:40:59
methamphetamine and you know what did he
00:41:02
get community service or something like
00:41:04
150 hours.
00:41:06
>> Yeah. And
00:41:07
>> yeah but trying to blame it on her. I
00:41:08
mean there there was Yeah. She had
00:41:10
searches on her phone like what are the
00:41:11
effects of methamphetamine? Like she had
00:41:13
no she was clueless. She had no idea
00:41:15
what it did
00:41:15
>> quite Yeah. It would it would seem to be
00:41:17
the case. Right. Yeah. Yeah. That was
00:41:22
>> Yeah. I mean, dear old Pauline, I wish
00:41:24
I'd met her. You know, she sounded fun.
00:41:26
She sounded pretty stam again with her
00:41:30
internet searches. She was searching,
00:41:34
>> you know, she was searching all these uh
00:41:37
authors,
00:41:38
you know, not too long before she she
00:41:40
died. I remember one of them was uh
00:41:43
Gustav Flo who's the author of Madame
00:41:45
Bovery and she would have loved that
00:41:49
book you know she would have really
00:41:51
loved that book about a
00:41:55
>> it's about a woman who marries unwisely
00:41:57
[Music]
00:42:00
>> love to have sat down with Pauline and
00:42:02
her brother Bruce over a bottle of wine
00:42:07
and Bruce Bruce had a signature dish
00:42:10
Indian meat deal that he liked to that
00:42:12
he liked to make.
00:42:14
>> Uh wouldn't it have been wouldn't have
00:42:15
been would have been such fun to have
00:42:17
met them totally outside of this tragedy
00:42:20
>> and go hi you seemed really terrific.
00:42:22
Let's let's let's drink this bottle.
00:42:24
Let's have this meal
00:42:27
uh and have a good old chat, you know,
00:42:30
and and I would have to say, you know,
00:42:33
and fulfill not to be present.
00:42:35
[Music]
00:42:36
>> Yeah. Will you keep in touch with him at
00:42:38
all? the the at the beginning of the
00:42:40
book there's a text that he sent you in
00:42:41
regards to um
00:42:43
>> your older brother's um death recently
00:42:44
which was
00:42:45
>> charitable.
00:42:46
>> Yeah, it was very charitable. This is
00:42:48
the thing he's you know at the very
00:42:50
least he's an unpleasant person but it's
00:42:53
not the only thing about him. I did like
00:42:55
him you know a fair bit by chatting to
00:42:58
him constantly throughout the trial and
00:43:01
getting a sense of him.
00:43:04
Um, and he is likable, you know, he is
00:43:07
he has a Yeah, I think he has a genuine
00:43:11
real generous streak. He's got a a
00:43:13
spirit of generosity.
00:43:16
Um, yeah, my my brother died uh in
00:43:20
December just before Christmas and um he
00:43:24
sent me this text out of the blue and I
00:43:27
was really touched by that. Um
00:43:31
I'm kind of I'm kind of um I'm more than
00:43:34
aware actually that when I when I
00:43:37
interviewed Madison and you know I would
00:43:40
have said to her oh look I I you know
00:43:42
for what it's worth I liked him. She
00:43:44
said don't you don't you do that you
00:43:46
know don't believe a word that comes out
00:43:48
of his mouth.
00:43:50
Anything he says to you which you regard
00:43:52
as nice is just him using you. You're
00:43:55
just this was her metaphor. you're just
00:43:58
toilet paper to him.
00:44:00
>> Um, hell of a hell of a metaphor.
00:44:03
Honestly, uh,
00:44:06
I respect Madison and and I think almost
00:44:08
everything she said I I I, you know,
00:44:11
thought was entirely accurate and true.
00:44:14
Um, but again, I I I would I gave uh
00:44:18
Phil uh the benefit of the doubt as per
00:44:21
the death of his wife and and as per
00:44:24
being a nice guy. Uh I I think
00:44:28
everybody's pretty much everyone is
00:44:30
capable of being a nice guy um
00:44:32
regardless of something they may have
00:44:35
done.
00:44:38
>> Well, thanks for sharing those insights.
00:44:40
Yeah. Yeah. Is that the you do will he
00:44:42
read this book? What do you think he'll
00:44:44
think of it?
00:44:45
>> What's the extent of your relationship
00:44:47
moving forward? Gee, um
00:44:53
I think the last time I the last time I
00:44:55
heard from Phil was uh when the
00:44:58
documentary
00:45:00
was screened or before it was screened,
00:45:03
the documentary makers had a had a
00:45:05
launch uh a private launch a private
00:45:08
screening for it to which I was invited.
00:45:13
You know, lots of journalists came to
00:45:15
that. And I get this text from Phil
00:45:19
saying, "Hey, are you going to the
00:45:20
screening?" Said, "Yeah, yeah. How are
00:45:22
you going?" "Yeah, I am." Sure. Well, I
00:45:24
don't know why I ever been invited.
00:45:27
I thought, "Wow." Um, I suppose he got a
00:45:30
point, you know, that he would take
00:45:32
umbrage at not being invited to a
00:45:35
screening essentially about his story.
00:45:39
Um, but conversely, you know, uh, uh,
00:45:42
equally, you know, I I'm having a a
00:45:45
private book launch for this book. Uh,
00:45:48
love you to come to that, Dom, but I'm
00:45:50
not going to invite Phil.
00:45:52
>> I think that would be in poor taste.
00:45:56
>> Has he asked you to write his book? I
00:45:57
believe he's been shopping around a book
00:46:00
even though he's not a writer.
00:46:02
>> Um,
00:46:03
>> apart from medical documents.
00:46:05
>> Yeah.
00:46:05
>> Which I believe are quite good.
00:46:07
>> Yeah, he is. Uh he's been he was working
00:46:10
on the book during the trial quite
00:46:12
assiduously. You know I I said to him
00:46:14
one day
00:46:16
um you know he he'd sit in front of his
00:46:18
his his screen all day and I would
00:46:21
slowly fill up with these quite dense
00:46:23
long paragraphs
00:46:26
and uh you couldn't quite see what they
00:46:28
were they were about. But I had this
00:46:30
epiphany one day and when court finished
00:46:32
for that day I took him aside and said
00:46:34
you're writing a book aren't you? Yep.
00:46:37
You damn right I am.
00:46:39
>> Um, what do you say it's called? Guilty
00:46:42
until proven innocent. Not a bad title.
00:46:45
>> Um, oh, you know, good luck to him. Uh,
00:46:48
in in in writing it and in finishing it.
00:46:54
Uh, anyone who writes a book, that's you
00:46:56
you know yourself, Dom, it's it's a it's
00:46:59
a pile of work.
00:47:00
>> Terrible payday as well. terribly hourly
00:47:03
rate.
00:47:06
>> It's not a good hourly rate, is it? But
00:47:08
no, good luck to him. Um, you know, his
00:47:11
book is going to be a document which
00:47:13
which sets out his um sets out his
00:47:17
innocence.
00:47:18
Um, he was found not guilty. So, you
00:47:21
know, fair enough uh for him to want to
00:47:24
do that. He's not the person not the
00:47:26
kind of person to just walk away,
00:47:29
>> you know. He um he's an interesting guy.
00:47:32
Um there was that comment that a um a
00:47:36
witness made during the trial.
00:47:39
Myra Rington was her name. Probably the
00:47:42
most interesting witness that we saw.
00:47:45
She lived in an apartment block on the
00:47:49
Northshore
00:47:50
and she was there to say that she saw
00:47:53
Pulking Horn arrive drive up
00:47:57
regularly at this apartment to have
00:48:00
appointments with a sex worker
00:48:04
who lived there. And her one of her
00:48:07
remarks was um he's a man who likes to
00:48:10
stand out. This was in reference to his
00:48:15
was Merc with the license with a with a
00:48:17
a catchy uh license plate to the fact he
00:48:21
wore bow ties. Um
00:48:24
>> that's right. Sometimes he turned up in
00:48:25
his like medical scrubs.
00:48:27
>> He did once.
00:48:29
Poor form, isn't it? Really? Good grief.
00:48:32
Um
00:48:33
>> that's right. With a bottle of
00:48:34
champagne.
00:48:34
>> Yeah. He did not arrive discreetly, you
00:48:36
know. He was like, "Here I am
00:48:41
in my Merc um wearing scrubs or a bow
00:48:45
tie, you know. Um it's so similar to
00:48:50
that. He he,
00:48:53
you know, he he's not a person in the in
00:48:56
the in the aftermath of this
00:48:59
extraordinary trial.
00:49:02
He's not a person to fade gently away.
00:49:06
>> Cuz that would be easy to do, wouldn't
00:49:07
it? Just move to Australia somewhere.
00:49:09
Move to Brisbane. Be a face in the
00:49:10
crowd.
00:49:11
>> Oh my god. You I
00:49:13
>> He's got the resources.
00:49:15
>> I You know, I caught up with him not
00:49:17
long after. And I said, "So,
00:49:19
>> what are you doing here?" You know, um,
00:49:25
move to the Gold Coast. Get the hell out
00:49:28
of here.
00:49:29
You know, I couldn't imagine him walking
00:49:31
around the neighborhood and putting up
00:49:34
with people staring at him or or hissing
00:49:37
at him or maybe worse, you know. Um I
00:49:42
haven't actually read it yet, Dom, but I
00:49:43
gather there's a story in the paper at
00:49:45
the moment. Have you seen this about his
00:49:48
real estate sign?
00:49:49
>> Oh, yeah. Just last weekend, um yeah,
00:49:51
someone graffitied it with the word
00:49:52
killer,
00:49:53
>> right?
00:49:54
>> Why would you want to hang around that
00:49:56
kind of scene, you know? Um well it his
00:50:00
answer would be I didn't do anything
00:50:02
wrong. Um leave me be. I like you know
00:50:08
he he likes Oakland. He's got he's got
00:50:11
people here.
00:50:12
>> He's got his his sister here lives down
00:50:15
the road from him.
00:50:18
Got every right to be here I guess. Um,
00:50:21
not not I'm not arguing against that,
00:50:23
but gee, you
00:50:25
>> you think nine people out of 10 would
00:50:27
go, you know what? I've always wanted to
00:50:30
live in Paraguay.
00:50:33
>> Well, what is he now? Like 73 72 73.
00:50:36
>> Yeah. Must be around there.
00:50:37
>> So, another another 10 15 years left
00:50:40
maybe. Go and enjoy it somewhere.
00:50:42
>> Paraguay. Yeah. Cheap property.
00:50:45
>> I don't know actually.
00:50:47
>> Yeah. I mean, he's been he's at the very
00:50:50
least, you know, you would think he's
00:50:52
been cancelled,
00:50:53
>> but he refuses to acknowledge it and
00:50:55
walks around to this day, you know. Um,
00:50:59
free as a bird. Um, I don't know. It's
00:51:02
his choice. It's his personality. It's
00:51:05
his it's his thing. Um, let him be, I
00:51:09
guess.
00:51:11
>> Thanks for those insights on Pulking
00:51:12
Horn. It's a Yeah, it's a great book. I
00:51:14
read the beginning of it and the end of
00:51:16
it. Um cuz I I only had limited time
00:51:18
before this podcast, but I'm looking
00:51:19
forward to reading the rest of it cuz
00:51:21
I'm legitimately enjoying it.
00:51:22
>> Look, I I I thoroughly enjoyed this
00:51:24
chat. Um
00:51:25
>> Oh, no, no, no. We're not wrapping up
00:51:27
the chat.
00:51:27
>> Oh, really? I thought I thought I
00:51:29
thought we were shaking hands.
00:51:30
>> No, it's the poking horn section.
00:51:32
>> That's the poking horn section. Is there
00:51:34
a worse one to follow?
00:51:35
>> No, not not at all. But you haven't done
00:51:37
a lot in the way of podcast. I was
00:51:38
telling you before we came in, I heard
00:51:39
one on because once a podcast is
00:51:41
published, it remains there until the
00:51:43
publisher removes it. And you've done
00:51:44
one with Simon Sweetman who's a uh a
00:51:47
writer.
00:51:48
>> Oh yeah.
00:51:49
>> Um
00:51:50
>> and there's another one with Graham Hill
00:51:51
which was like a radio segment which was
00:51:53
posted online on the podcast platforms.
00:51:54
But this is your first long form
00:51:56
platform about Steve Bronners
00:51:58
>> I guess. Is this what this is? Yeah.
00:52:00
Would be. Yeah. Yeah. I'd forgotten
00:52:02
those two. I mean they were
00:52:03
>> they were chats. Were they podcasts?
00:52:05
Were they?
00:52:06
>> Yeah. They're on the various podcast
00:52:07
apps,
00:52:08
>> right? Podcast apps.
00:52:10
>> Yeah. Like Spotify and Apple. You you're
00:52:12
playing dumb, right? You you've got a
00:52:14
your daughter's what 18 19? Yeah. You
00:52:17
know, you even mentioned Taylor Swift
00:52:19
before. You you know about podcasting.
00:52:23
I I I certainly know about it. I've
00:52:25
never play your character.
00:52:26
>> I've never listened to one in my life.
00:52:28
No. No. No. Actually, I listened to one
00:52:31
a few years ago. Put me off for life.
00:52:33
Really? Um I'm not I'm not a Yeah. God
00:52:37
mighty. The idea of this seems
00:52:40
contradictory to say because I'm
00:52:41
recording a podcast with you, but the
00:52:43
idea of sitting down to to to listen to
00:52:45
somebody chering on. Oh, the [ __ ]
00:52:49
death. Steve Bronnius talking about
00:52:52
Pulking Horn and his brand new book
00:52:54
Pulking Horn inside the toile of the
00:52:55
century is out now. That part of the
00:52:58
podcast came from a bigger conversation
00:53:00
that we had which includes stories about
00:53:02
Steve's life, his career, his thoughts
00:53:04
on aging, the future, uh, so much more
00:53:07
than that. That episode with Steve
00:53:10
Bronnius, an insight into the man
00:53:11
himself. It's going to be out later this
00:53:13
week. It's the next episode released on
00:53:15
the Dom Harvey podcast. As you heard
00:53:17
just there from Steve himself, it's his
00:53:20
worst nightmare. Just a couple of people
00:53:22
chering on, as he said. But yeah, if you
00:53:25
like Steve Bronnius and you like that
00:53:27
episode and you're curious to know more
00:53:29
about one of New Zealand's greatest
00:53:31
writers, check it out next on the Domy
00:53:34
podcast.

Podspun Insights

In this riveting episode, listeners are taken on a journey through the intricate world of court trials, as the host engages with the sharp-witted Steve Bronnius. The conversation unfolds in a lively, almost theatrical manner, as Bronnius shares his experiences covering high-profile cases, including the infamous Pulking Horn trial. With a blend of humor and gravity, they explore the emotional complexities of crime reporting, the moral dilemmas faced by journalists, and the human stories that often get lost in the legal shuffle.

As Bronnius reflects on his writing style, he reveals the delicate balance between being merciless and compassionate, showcasing the duality of human nature. The episode is peppered with anecdotes that highlight the absurdities and tragedies of the courtroom, making it both entertaining and thought-provoking. Listeners are left pondering the nature of justice, the role of the media, and the impact of public perception on individuals involved in sensational trials.

With its engaging dialogue and insightful commentary, this episode not only captivates but also invites listeners to reflect on the complexities of truth and storytelling in the realm of crime.

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 92
    Most intense
  • 91
    Best concept / idea
  • 90
    Most shocking
  • 89
    Best overall

Episode Highlights

  • Steve Bronnius on Writing
    Steve Bronnius shares his thoughts on the challenges and ethics of writing about trials.
    “I just can't resist a lot of things.”
    @ 02m 27s
    July 20, 2025
  • The Drama of Court Trials
    Steve Bronnius reveals what draws him to court cases—the intense drama and high stakes.
    “It's what gets said in a room about something which has happened very fast.”
    @ 08m 56s
    July 20, 2025
  • The Poignancy of Trials
    Bronnius reflects on the emotional impact of courtroom trials and the families involved.
    “The poignancy of it is attractive.”
    @ 13m 05s
    July 20, 2025
  • The Nation's Longing for Grace
    The sudden announcement of Grace's disappearance captivated the nation, leading to an outpouring of empathy.
    “Where is she?”
    @ 22m 44s
    July 20, 2025
  • The Jury's Dilemma
    The jury struggled with their verdict, questioning the evidence of murder versus suicide.
    “Some of us do not believe there is enough proof that this was a suicide.”
    @ 29m 41s
    July 20, 2025
  • Pulking Horn's Denial
    Pulking Horn's refusal to accept responsibility for his actions raises questions about his character.
    “He doesn’t seem like a very nice man.”
    @ 39m 30s
    July 20, 2025
  • Pulking Horn's Book
    Pulking Horn is determined to write a book titled 'Guilty until proven innocent.'
    “Not a bad title.”
    @ 46m 42s
    July 20, 2025
  • Witness's Remark
    A witness described Pulking Horn as 'a man who likes to stand out.'
    “He’s a man who likes to stand out.”
    @ 48m 07s
    July 20, 2025
  • Refusal to Fade Away
    Despite the trial's aftermath, Pulking Horn refuses to disappear from public life.
    “He’s not a person to fade gently away.”
    @ 49m 02s
    July 20, 2025

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Welcome to the Podcast00:36
  • Ease Your Terror00:48
  • Merciless Writing01:27
  • Emotional Weight13:05
  • Trial Followed with Warmth23:01
  • Pulking Horn's Character39:30
  • Community Ties50:11
  • Podcast Reflections52:31

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown

Related Episodes

Podcast thumbnail
Mark Longley Reflects on Emily Longley’s Life, Her 2011 Murder & Shares Domestic Violence Warning
Podcast thumbnail
EXCLUSIVE: Detective Inspector Scott Beard’s New Cancer Diagnosis, Reflecting on Grace Millane Case
Podcast thumbnail
Chook Henwood - Detective for 37 Years in South Auckland, Convicting Malcom Rewa & Joseph Thompson
Podcast thumbnail
From Manslaughter to Māori Farmer of the Year: The Incredible Story Of Ben Purua
Podcast thumbnail
Simon Bridges Reflects on Relationships with Winston, Jacinda, Slushies, Scooters & More!
Podcast thumbnail
Matthew Ridge shares awkward story about how he met his wife | Runners Only! Podcast with Dom Harvey