Search Captions & Ask AI

Pants On Fire | Criminal Podcast

October 24, 2022 / 13:11

This episode features Andy Morgan, a forensic psychologist, discussing human memory and deception, the effectiveness of polygraphs, and cognitive interviewing techniques.

Andy Morgan explains how people lie and the various contexts in which lying occurs, including professional settings like undercover work. He highlights that the common belief that body language can indicate deception is largely unsupported by scientific evidence.

The episode critiques the polygraph, revealing its accuracy is only slightly better than chance at detecting lies. Morgan emphasizes that physiological responses associated with lying are not reliable indicators.

He introduces cognitive interviewing, a technique that enhances memory recall by prompting individuals to describe sensory details of their experiences. This method proves more effective in distinguishing truth from lies.

Ultimately, Morgan suggests that analyzing transcripts of interviews can yield better results than relying on trained professionals to detect deception, challenging traditional beliefs about communication.

TLDR

Forensic psychologist Andy Morgan discusses deception, the unreliability of polygraphs, and effective cognitive interviewing techniques.

Episode

13:11
00:00:09
what about those that that have been trained to lie you know that this is this is they know
00:00:16
how to do this they know how to lie in an interrogation is that possible are we able to
00:00:23
to train people to lie oh people lie all the time i don't know if you have to be trained i
00:00:31
think people learn as they grow up there's all kinds of lies people can tell right you can tell lies about the
00:00:36
past the future yourself other people you can lie for fun you can lie to not be punished you can lie because it's
00:00:44
your job if you're a professional working undercover you have to lie you can tell lies about what you did or what
00:00:49
you will do those are all different kinds of lies so in the context of when people are being
00:00:55
questioned by the police there's a number of ways in which a person could look if they are deceptive could look
00:01:02
absolutely normal whereas a truthful person might actually be frightened of the police and they
00:01:08
ironically would look deceptive there's this thought that if you want to know if someone is lying you should be
00:01:15
able to tell by just looking at them that people give off signals of dishonesty this is huge in tv shows like
00:01:22
sherlock and lie to me plastic one-sided shrug translation i have absolutely no confidence what i just said the body
00:01:29
contradicts the words he's lying it feels so compelling that you should be able to recognize you know fear disgust
00:01:36
anger uh sadness and that these are universal expressions and i think that it's true that around the planet by and
00:01:44
large many emotions are expressed similarly on by by the facial muscles not entirely but similarly what's really
00:01:52
i think more questionable scientifically is whether or not these expressions or micro facial
00:01:59
expressions these quick flashes of human emotions on your face are actually signals of lying
00:02:04
so if your body doesn't matter the way we've thought it has for so long and what does
00:02:10
i'm phoebe judge and this is criminal [Music] for 20 years andy morgan has been studying human memory and deception he's
00:02:29
worked with the fbi cia the military law enforcement groups and it goes without saying that all those people morgan
00:02:36
worked with they really like to know when someone's lying to them they will do some crazy expensive exhaustive
00:02:43
things to find out if someone's lying to them but what we're learning now is that a
00:02:48
lot of those things they've been trying they just don't work we've been looking for physiological
00:02:55
clues since the 1920s with the invention of the lie detector this is the read polygraph
00:03:01
a lie detector in the past 20 years an estimated 200 000 persons have staked their futures
00:03:08
many of them their lives on this machine the polygraph as you know is a device that
00:03:14
records how fast you're breathing sort of your respiration rate and how much your chest is moving they put tubes
00:03:20
around your chest and the general belief in law enforcement and within the polygraph community for years has been
00:03:29
rooted in the idea that we call the fear and alarm hypothesis that variations in
00:03:34
blood pressure and pulse rate are present during and after the act of lying that
00:03:40
telling a lie is threatening in some way and that threat to you will trigger a difference a shift the conscious act
00:03:51
of lying creates an emotional disturbance and and cause your blood pressure to rise or
00:03:56
your skin conductance to go up or your respiration rate to change like holding your breath or maybe breathing more
00:04:02
rapidly now it may not shock you that the polygraph isn't a perfect tool but we were actually surprised to learn just
00:04:08
how inaccurate the machine is we actually know the polygraph in the way it is mainly used
00:04:15
is not better than chance at detecting deception maybe slightly at 52 52 53 you could literally flip a coin and be
00:04:24
just as accurate as the polygraph at detecting a lie but the idea that your body gives you away is still very much
00:04:31
alive it's still being used in police departments all over the country cops are trained to read body language
00:04:40
some investigators claim they can watch an interrogation with a sound off and know if someone's lying
00:04:46
but what andy morgan says is that when put to the test people aren't any better at sensing a lie than chance
00:04:53
and if that's true that we can't see a lie that we can't hear a lie or smell a lie or physically sense in any way when
00:05:00
someone's playing us then what do we do [Music] about a decade ago morgan and some
00:05:10
colleagues decided to test a different technique they started interviewing people from all over the world about
00:05:16
1200 of them so ranging from white brits to chinese east indians lebanese jordanians
00:05:24
moroccans sudanese afghans iraqis vietnamese russians my colleagues and i have tried to study
00:05:32
people inside and outside the united states and we've mainly used a particular technique
00:05:38
called cognitive interviewing cognitive interviewing is based on the premise that memory doesn't work like a video
00:05:44
camera there are sights and sounds and smells stored deep in your brain that can all be recalled if pushed hard
00:05:51
enough so every time morgan sat down to interview an american or jordanian some of them would be lying and others would
00:05:58
be telling the truth and he would ask them to do something pretty simple to tell us a story about what they've been
00:06:04
doing the most memorable concert that i've been to it's not the best it's the most
00:06:10
memorable so obviously this isn't actually tape for morgan's research we just put some of our friends to the test
00:06:16
was yay sayer about a year ago i went to a foo fighters concert in 2005 for the in your honor tour and then say
00:06:25
so if you imagine for a minute that i was there with you what would i have seen if i'd been there with you the
00:06:32
entire time they had the lights programmed with the music and so the mirrors really like reflected the
00:06:38
light and so there was like it would form shapes then we say when they're done so i think i'm getting a better picture
00:06:44
in my head so imagine from a moment i was with you but this time i was blind and i could only listen what would i
00:06:49
have heard during that time so it's more of a shuffling of like rubber against pavement there go down metal steps go
00:06:56
down to the car all car doors open you know depending on the contacts you might say what would i have smelled there was
00:07:02
this this girl that was standing next to me who was in his sweater dress who did not wear deodorant and then we
00:07:07
say starting with the very last thing that happened um what do you remember happening right before that uh
00:07:14
leave dorm right before that go walk backwards to car right before that get in car come
00:07:20
back to dorm kind of having them just walk us backwards through their memory crunching guitars and awesome drum stuff
00:07:27
what's been found over the years in many studies of cognitive interviewing is that using those
00:07:32
mnemonic prompts those those sensory prompts what you would have seen heard smelled thought touched or tasted
00:07:40
they trigger more memory recall you get more detail the picture becomes much more rich and complex without suggesting
00:07:48
anything specific to the person you're interviewing but here's where things get interesting
00:07:53
turns out if you're telling a lie a made-up story even one that's well rehearsed
00:07:58
you can't complete this interview not without giving yourself away if you tell a very simple lie there's not much work
00:08:04
to go i don't know and you have nothing to say kids do that all the time but if you're telling uh if you're telling a
00:08:09
story that's reasonably complicated and supposed to be believable because if i'm
00:08:13
lying to you my goal is to sell you the story i'm telling you and then to leave before you figure out it's not true
00:08:20
or not to bring up anything that might lead you to suspect that it's not true i'm trying to tell my story and stick to
00:08:28
it we find that liars are often worried that if they're inconsistent they will be thought to be lying so what they do
00:08:35
is they tell you a story so if i say tell me everything that happened they might tell me quite a wonderful story i
00:08:42
went to see florence in the machine it was like in the spring but then when i say
00:08:47
so let's go back to the beginning so imagine i was with you what would i have seen you know heard thought smell touch
00:08:52
tasted or walk through it backwards the overall result is they have very little to say do you remember the car
00:08:58
ride home uh not really they will say things like well pretty much just like i told you
00:09:06
before and they will repeat uh very closely the same thing they've already told me so that i'm not learning
00:09:14
anything new over time the thing is i don't even really remember it's sort of like comparing a digital photograph of
00:09:21
your house with the tree in the front yard and a child's picture of it where there's a house and there's a tree and
00:09:27
there's clouds and there's birds but there's not a lot of detail and what we tend to do when people tell us lies as i
00:09:35
think we fill in that we fill in the blanks and that morgan says is where the problem lies we fill in the blanks
00:09:42
because of course we want to believe people so andy morgan's challenge was to find a way to take these interviews and
00:09:49
analyze them without filling in the blanks to do this he had to put a little distance between himself and the
00:09:56
interesting person telling the story the way we've analyzed that in most of our studies is we record the interviews and
00:10:03
we do a transcript and we let the computer just count the number of words that comes out of a person's mouth in
00:10:09
the interview and the number of unique words that comes out of their mouth that so if you think about the phrase
00:10:16
one small step for man one giant leap for mankind there are ten words but you've used one
00:10:30
and four twice so there's only eight unique words as you're thinking harder about monitoring what you're saying it
00:10:36
has the side effect of reducing the richness of what you have to say and shortens the
00:10:42
thing that you have to say all the computer is doing is counting those two variables and
00:10:48
when we sort people based on those two variables response length and unique word count
00:10:56
the computer's right typically 80 to 85 percent of the time [Music] whereas our professional raiders whether
00:11:05
they come from homeland security or the fbi or the dia or other intelligence groups or law enforcement
00:11:12
our human raiders are rarely better than 54 correct it's kind of a crazy idea that someone
00:11:26
with a transcript and a tally sheet could tell us whether or not what we're remembering is accurate while someone
00:11:32
with decades of fbi interrogation training could be flying blind and this idea could have all sorts of
00:11:39
huge implications think about a jury a jury is just a bunch of people trying to figure out who to believe
00:11:46
but people according to andy morgan are terrible at figuring out who to believe isn't it possible that a juror with a
00:11:53
transcript of the trial who's never laid eyes on the accused might actually do a
00:11:58
better job at figuring out who's lying who to trust for andy morgan's part he's glad our
00:12:05
bodies aren't the end-all be-all it's reassuring to know that although there's so many books on nonverbal behavior and
00:12:12
people say 90 of communication is nonverbal based on the science i think that the best way to sort out
00:12:21
the truth is to listen to what people have to say and to know that maybe our fate won't
00:12:27
hang on sweaty palms or pounding heart that our words really do matter [Music] thanks to andy morgan who's a forensic
00:12:43
psychologist at yale and just in case you were curious during his interview with us he used more than 7200 words and
00:12:51
enough unique words to make us trust he wasn't lying the show is produced by lauren spohr
00:12:57
eric metal and me i'm phoebe judge and this is criminal you

Badges

This episode stands out for the following:

  • 60
    Best concept / idea

Episode Highlights

  • The Myth of the Polygraph
    The polygraph, often believed to detect lies, is actually only slightly better than chance.
    “You could literally flip a coin and be just as accurate as the polygraph.”
    @ 04m 22s
    October 24, 2022
  • Cognitive Interviewing Technique
    Morgan's cognitive interviewing technique helps trigger more detailed memory recall, revealing inconsistencies in liars' stories.
    “Using sensory prompts triggers more memory recall, making the picture richer and complex.”
    @ 07m 30s
    October 24, 2022
  • The Power of Words
    Andy Morgan emphasizes that listening to what people say is crucial in discerning truth.
    “It's reassuring to know that our words really do matter.”
    @ 12m 30s
    October 24, 2022

Episode Quotes

  • You can lie for fun, to avoid punishment, or because it's your job.
    Pants On Fire | Criminal Podcast
  • The polygraph isn't a perfect tool, and it's surprisingly inaccurate.
    Pants On Fire | Criminal Podcast
  • It's reassuring to know that our words really do matter.
    Pants On Fire | Criminal Podcast

Key Moments

  • Lying Techniques00:26
  • Polygraph Limitations04:05
  • Cognitive Interviewing05:38
  • Truth vs. Lies12:21

Words per Minute Over Time

Vibes Breakdown