00:00:00
We actually got our hands on both Dr. Howard's original autopsy and the new report which was done by a guy named Dr.
00:00:06
Carl Wigran. And Brit comparing these two reports, it's like they're not even talking about the same body. On her
00:00:13
upper body alone, Dr. Wigan notes four abrasions, including what looks like a shoe print on her chest and parallel
00:00:21
marks consistent with bindings. There are 18 sharp force wounds, 16 of which are concentrated on her hands and lower
00:00:29
arms as if she was trying to like defend herself. And there are 50 contusions also consistent with defensive wounds,
00:00:37
including a black eye. And on her lower half, he notes six abrasions, including a shoe print on her left thigh, nine
00:00:45
sharp force wounds, and 48 contusions consistent with defensive wounds, which is
00:00:53
like wild to me that we're still saying undetermined undetermined manner of death. It It like defies logic to me.
00:01:03
And like listen, Dr. Howard's report talked about like some defects like on her hands and fingers. He points out
00:01:11
some like cut like defects on her left hand and thumb like four of those. And then obviously he like notes like her
00:01:18
the wound where she's cut in half. And he makes a note of a stab wound on her thigh which which appears in both
00:01:24
reports. But there's like shoe prints on her thigh, shoe prints on her chest. Dude, he had nothing about her having a
00:01:31
black eye. He had nothing about her like the injuries on her lower arms or her legs. And what sticks out to me is like
00:01:38
the sheer enormity of the wounds in this second autopsy compared to the first. Like again, it feels like you're looking
00:01:46
at reports for two different victims. Yeah.