00:00:00
I am Vlad Tennv, the founder of Robin
00:00:03
Hood.
00:00:07
We're talking about Robin Hood. The
00:00:08
stock's more than doubled since its last
00:00:10
report.
00:00:10
It stock surged 180% this year after
00:00:14
nearly doubling in 2024. The
00:00:16
shares of the trading platform now up
00:00:17
more than 400% in the last year.
00:00:20
Glad your presence there speaks volumes.
00:00:22
Robin Hood Gold, which hit a record 3.5
00:00:24
million subscribers. Most financial
00:00:27
services get worse the more money you
00:00:29
have, but we wanted to kind of invert
00:00:31
that.
00:00:32
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome
00:00:36
Robin Hood CEO Vlad Tenner,
00:00:46
my guy.
00:00:48
Good to see you, brother.
00:00:50
Good to see you.
00:00:50
Good to see you.
00:00:51
You're the reason Jake Health's here. I
00:00:54
mean
00:00:55
I mean it is a great story.
00:00:57
It's so true. Jake Cal bumbles into
00:01:00
eight shares of Robin Hood. Lad builds a
00:01:02
hundred billion dollar companies. It's
00:01:04
unbelievable.
00:01:04
I mean people know me for the Uber
00:01:06
investment which four or $5 million
00:01:09
valuation. But there's
00:01:10
When do I flip that?
00:01:12
Well, yeah, it's going to take a little
00:01:13
more. I think you got 20x left to go.
00:01:15
But
00:01:16
wait, was JL the third or fourth
00:01:18
investor in Robin Hood? It was $20
00:01:20
million valuation, but it's a good
00:01:22
story, I think, because you hadn't
00:01:24
launched. And we're at Antonio's
00:01:26
Nutouse. I went for a drink with my
00:01:29
friend Ado. He brought his college
00:01:30
roommate, Elon. We're hanging out at
00:01:32
Antonio's Nut House in Palo Alto. Rest
00:01:34
in peace, Antonio.
00:01:35
Keep dropping these names. One second.
00:01:36
So Vlad comes over. We we Vlad and I
00:01:38
knew each other a little bit. And Vlad
00:01:40
pitches me on this idea and he says,
00:01:43
"Um, I'm a quant." I said, "What's a
00:01:46
quant?" He said, "Quant analysis." I
00:01:48
said, "Yeah, I heard of it. Um, hit me
00:01:50
with the idea." And then he goes, "Is
00:01:52
that Elon Musk?" I said, "Yeah, just hit
00:01:54
me with the idea. I know you got a
00:01:55
startup." He says, "Well, I I want to
00:01:57
get
00:01:59
uh this generation, these millennials,
00:02:01
these Gen Z's. I want to get them to
00:02:03
trade stocks." I said, "Love it. They
00:02:06
don't care about like getting a driver's
00:02:08
license. They they don't they're still
00:02:10
on their mom and dad's Netflix. You're
00:02:12
going to try to get people who don't
00:02:13
care about the future to trade stocks?"
00:02:15
He says, "Yeah." I said, "What's the
00:02:16
business model?" I said, "This is the
00:02:18
best part. We're going to let him trade
00:02:19
for free." So I said, "Okay, let me
00:02:22
repeat this back to you, kid. You want
00:02:23
to get a group of people who don't have
00:02:25
any interest in the future to trade
00:02:28
stocks and then
00:02:30
we have 30 seconds.
00:02:30
You're going to make money. You're going
00:02:31
to make money.
00:02:32
Thank you, Vlad."
00:02:35
I said, "I'm in. I'm in."
00:02:37
Not only that, but he said, "This is
00:02:38
probably the best idea you'll ever
00:02:40
have."
00:02:41
I did say that to him, too. I was like,
00:02:42
"This is the best idea. What if it
00:02:44
works?" And here we are 10 years later.
00:02:46
what's worked.
00:02:47
And last week you were added to the S&P
00:02:48
500.
00:02:49
I was
00:02:50
last week or yesterday? Two days ago.
00:02:51
It was Friday.
00:02:52
I mean, what a huge accomplishment.
00:02:54
Thank you.
00:02:55
I mean, I think I think it was cuz I
00:02:57
rejected you for a job, right?
00:02:58
It you heard about that.
00:02:59
This is a series.
00:03:01
Thank you guys for upgrading me, by the
00:03:03
way. I guess that that's been the best
00:03:04
part of being added to the S&P going
00:03:06
from just a Jason interview to to the
00:03:08
whole squad.
00:03:09
We were doing the rehearsal yesterday
00:03:10
and everyone wanted to do the the
00:03:12
interview, so we said, "Let's all do it
00:03:13
together."
00:03:14
Why don't we all get in here? Can I uh
00:03:15
let's let's maybe start. So look, you've
00:03:17
built an incredible business. Um there's
00:03:19
a part of it that looks like the you
00:03:22
know what comes after the Erades of the
00:03:24
world etc. But there's an enormous other
00:03:26
part of your business and there's all
00:03:28
these emergent paths. I want to just
00:03:30
start by double clicking in something
00:03:31
that you announced a few months ago in
00:03:33
France and maybe you want to talk us
00:03:36
through it what the goal was. You got a
00:03:39
lot of support but you got a lot of
00:03:40
blowback as well. There was a lot of
00:03:42
people that were like, "Wow, this is a
00:03:43
little too disruptive tokenizing these
00:03:45
stocks, putting them on the blockchain."
00:03:47
Maybe talk us through the business and
00:03:49
then just double click on that narrow
00:03:50
thing so we can understand what you're
00:03:52
up to.
00:03:53
Yeah. So, we had an event in in the
00:03:55
south of France that we called to catch
00:03:57
a token. And the idea behind that event
00:04:00
was we wanted to show what Robin Hood,
00:04:04
the app, the platform would look like if
00:04:06
it was built from the ground up on
00:04:09
crypto technology. So what that looked
00:04:11
like was stocks on blockchains. Uh
00:04:14
obviously we added a bunch of
00:04:16
cryptonnative features like pers. Um we
00:04:19
launched in now 31 countries. And then
00:04:23
uh we also wanted to demonstrate to the
00:04:25
US what the power of putting traditional
00:04:28
financial services on blockchains was.
00:04:31
And to me, I think a lot of people talk
00:04:34
about 24/7 stock trading, instant
00:04:37
settlement, these things that do have
00:04:39
real value, but I think the most
00:04:41
powerful thing is taking inaccessible,
00:04:44
illlquid assets and making them
00:04:47
available. And and so we we were
00:04:49
actually, I think, the first to tokenize
00:04:51
OpenAI and SpaceX and we made that
00:04:54
available to our retail customers in
00:04:56
Europe in the form of a giveaway. and
00:04:58
and that was very very exciting, you
00:05:00
know, not not without its controversy,
00:05:02
but I felt like it was such a powerful
00:05:05
thing.
00:05:06
How do you do it? How did you enable
00:05:07
that?
00:05:08
It's actually very similar to uh
00:05:10
stablecoin in a way. So, if you're a
00:05:13
stable coin issuer, and this it's a
00:05:16
little bit oversimplifying, but you can
00:05:17
think of it as we keep some dollars or
00:05:20
treasuries in a bucket over here. uh we
00:05:24
mint and burn tokens against that bucket
00:05:26
but back at one to one and the tokens
00:05:29
can actually trade publicly on a variety
00:05:32
of of blockchains. So it's just
00:05:34
extending that token that that
00:05:36
tokenization concept from stable coins
00:05:39
to uh public and and private.
00:05:42
So you had to go and secure your own
00:05:44
block of SpaceX and OpenAI stock and
00:05:48
and then put it somewhere. Were the
00:05:49
companies okay with it? Um, it depends.
00:05:53
Uh, I think I think that, uh, I'll say a
00:05:57
couple of things. Um, I think a lot of
00:06:00
people are okay with it in principle,
00:06:02
but if you're a company and you're
00:06:05
focused on your mission like OpenAI is,
00:06:07
and you hear about some new thing, uh,
00:06:11
it's kind of a distraction. So, I I
00:06:13
don't really blame them for tokeniz
00:06:15
tokenization or private access not being
00:06:17
their their top priority, but I did want
00:06:20
to be the first to tokenize open AI. So,
00:06:22
uh
00:06:23
did Sam give you a call?
00:06:25
Uh I have had a couple conversations
00:06:27
with with Sam before and after.
00:06:29
Um cuz yeah, he's a spicy individual.
00:06:31
What was his take? Did he tell you to
00:06:32
stop?
00:06:34
Um I think that actually uh I I'd like
00:06:37
to think we get along quite well. I
00:06:39
think he understood why we were doing
00:06:40
it. Again, the distraction aspect when
00:06:44
they have so much going on uh is is a
00:06:47
real thing. But at the end of the day,
00:06:50
where do you take it from here? Are you
00:06:51
going to go and get 50, 100 of these
00:06:54
well-known private companies? Is that
00:06:55
the goal? Is it every private company?
00:06:57
How like what do you do from here to
00:06:59
build on top of it?
00:07:00
Yeah. So, we we've been hard at work
00:07:03
trying to figure out how to do it in the
00:07:05
US. I think that's that's uh everyone's
00:07:08
interested in that since the France
00:07:09
announcement. obviously expanding what
00:07:12
we do in Europe as well and there will
00:07:15
probably be different mechanisms in the
00:07:18
US and and in Europe at least for some
00:07:20
time but uh yeah you you should expect
00:07:23
that we go bigger and deeper into the
00:07:26
space and have plenty of things to do in
00:07:28
the future.
00:07:28
I'm curious what the relationship has
00:07:31
been with the new administration. the
00:07:33
last administration, you know, was not
00:07:35
very pro- innovation, crypto, and now
00:07:38
you got David uh running that
00:07:40
specifically. How has the change in the
00:07:43
administration changed how you look at
00:07:45
innovation at Robin Hood? And then Sax,
00:07:47
I'm sure you have some follow-up
00:07:48
questions here.
00:07:49
Yeah, it's been very positive. I mean,
00:07:51
just uh by nature of how many times I've
00:07:53
been to Washington, uh the last
00:07:56
administration
00:07:58
didn't invite me to the White House
00:07:59
once. Uh, I asked for meetings and they
00:08:02
wouldn't even meet in person. They were
00:08:04
all working remotely uh until I think
00:08:07
2023, early 2024. Um,
00:08:11
it was funny how remote work kind of
00:08:13
broke down along political lines. It's
00:08:16
sort of like the the Republicans wanted
00:08:18
to get back into the office.
00:08:18
I think you're referring to remote work
00:08:20
as not working.
00:08:22
I mean, that is uh I wasn't going to say
00:08:24
it, but uh yeah. Um,
00:08:27
yeah, it was funny how that works out,
00:08:28
but it's it's been very positive. I
00:08:30
mean, last administration,
00:08:32
we were playing a lot of defense. It was
00:08:34
just sort of like one enforcement action
00:08:38
and we had a wells notice and all
00:08:41
aspects of our business were sort of
00:08:45
under assault. So I think the most
00:08:47
direct thing was when that went away, we
00:08:50
had to think, okay, well there the
00:08:52
administration now wants to work with us
00:08:54
rather than just trying to attack us
00:08:56
from all these angles. And for a while
00:08:58
we didn't even know how to operate in
00:09:00
that environment because we were just
00:09:01
completely not used to it.
00:09:03
Yeah, you were on your
00:09:04
Have you met with Elizabeth Warren?
00:09:06
Uh I have not. No, I just receive
00:09:09
letters from time to time. But
00:09:12
she really But she hates you. Well, I
00:09:14
told me personally, she really can't
00:09:15
take it.
00:09:16
No, the reason the reason I asked is
00:09:19
what is the core motivation of the idea
00:09:23
of we need to enforce, we need to kind
00:09:24
of restrict, we need to prohibit. Is it
00:09:26
consumer protection that the belief is
00:09:29
that systems like yours that are more
00:09:30
open, more accessible, more usable, more
00:09:34
consumers will trade more and
00:09:35
potentially lose money and therefore
00:09:37
they have to try and play a role in
00:09:39
restricting consumer access to these
00:09:40
markets and these marketplaces. and
00:09:42
that's what they're mo ultimately kind
00:09:44
of driving towards or do you think that
00:09:45
there's something more vested
00:09:47
interestwise that's motivating?
00:09:49
I mean I think I think there's probably
00:09:50
both. Certainly consumer protection is
00:09:54
the stated reason but obviously these
00:09:57
folks have funders and backers and lots
00:10:00
of interests. I mean there's powerful
00:10:02
there's powerful financial services
00:10:04
companies in the state of Massachusetts.
00:10:06
So, I don't know what's happening behind
00:10:08
the scenes, but you know, I do think the
00:10:11
consumer protection angle is what
00:10:13
they're kind of
00:10:15
pulling out. How do you Yeah. How do you
00:10:17
look at this type of innovation and your
00:10:20
role at the White House to support it
00:10:23
and to foster it while still, you know,
00:10:26
having some rules on the field?
00:10:28
Well, I think Vlad's uh vision around
00:10:30
tokenization is very exciting. I like
00:10:32
you wrote a oped I think it's in the
00:10:34
Washington Post that I thought was very
00:10:35
good on this this topic. We now have a
00:10:38
regulatory framework in place the Genius
00:10:40
Act which the president signed in July
00:10:42
that creates um the the the the set of
00:10:45
rules for stable coins which are just
00:10:47
tokenized dollars. And like Vlad's
00:10:49
saying if you can tokenize a dollar you
00:10:50
can tokenize anything. You just
00:10:52
basically create a reserve of that asset
00:10:54
in a secure account at a bank somewhere
00:10:57
or a broker and then you mint tokens on
00:10:59
a onetoone basis. So I think it's very
00:11:02
exciting is there's no reason why we
00:11:03
can't tokenize. Let's start with public
00:11:06
securities. I think that's the easy case
00:11:09
because with public companies there's
00:11:11
already disclosure requirements. There's
00:11:13
an abundance of information and anybody
00:11:15
can buy a public security, right?
00:11:17
Because of those disclosure
00:11:18
requirements. Um and the companies don't
00:11:22
really care who their stockholders are,
00:11:24
right? I mean because they know that the
00:11:26
public owns these securities. So what we
00:11:28
could get right away with tokenized
00:11:31
securities, public securities is like
00:11:33
you were saying a 24/7 global
00:11:35
marketplace uh with instantaneous
00:11:38
blockchain based settlement and that
00:11:40
could be really exciting. There's no
00:11:42
reason why trading has to be on this
00:11:44
like 9-to-F5 exchange with all this, you
00:11:47
know, we could enable stocks to trade as
00:11:50
easily as you, you know, transfer a a
00:11:53
stable coin. Now the private security
00:11:55
part is interesting that that is I think
00:11:59
more complicated because first of all
00:12:01
the companies like you're saying they do
00:12:03
care who their shareholders are and they
00:12:06
do generally restrict those things and
00:12:07
that's why you probably got the phone
00:12:08
call from Sam and then the regulators
00:12:11
care also because there's not as much
00:12:13
public disclosure. So they there's more
00:12:16
uh of an impetus to protect the public.
00:12:18
By the way I'm not saying we can't get
00:12:19
there on private securities. Um about a
00:12:22
decade ago a ago I founded
00:12:24
a startup to tokenize uh real estate
00:12:27
called Harbor and we were just way too
00:12:29
far ahead of the curve but that that was
00:12:30
basically to to um tokenize uh private
00:12:34
real estate securities. So I think we
00:12:36
can get there but I think the place to
00:12:38
start that would be really exciting
00:12:39
would just be like let's do the public
00:12:41
securities first because it's easy or
00:12:43
easier from a regulatory standpoint and
00:12:46
then we can work our way into private.
00:12:47
Yeah, it's certainly easier
00:12:48
technologically. I mean, we we've we've
00:12:51
made both uh available to some extent in
00:12:53
the EU. Um I think private could be more
00:12:58
meaningful long term and I I'll I'll
00:13:00
tell you why I think so. If you look at
00:13:02
the technologies that are transforming
00:13:06
society right now and that we feel so
00:13:08
optimistic about over the next 5 years,
00:13:11
it's AI and to some extent, you know,
00:13:14
space exploration. And I think with AI
00:13:17
in particular, there's a lot of fear
00:13:19
right now. I mean, you talk to a random
00:13:21
person on the street, more than half the
00:13:23
time, they're a little bit nervous about
00:13:25
what AI is going to do to them. Now,
00:13:28
imagine the scenario if you know 20 to
00:13:32
30% of someone's net worth is in AI
00:13:35
companies. Now, suddenly they're not
00:13:38
fighting against this thing. They want
00:13:39
it to succeed because if AI succeeds
00:13:43
entrepreneurship as a way to let more
00:13:45
people participate in the boom.
00:13:47
Yeah. Because I worry about the status
00:13:49
quo. I mean these AI companies in
00:13:51
particular are getting into valuations
00:13:52
of hundreds and hundreds of billions
00:13:55
with zero retail ownership. And that
00:13:58
technology could completely disrupt you
00:14:02
know how normal people live their lives.
00:14:04
And we actually expect it to drive that
00:14:06
sort of disruption because if if you
00:14:08
look at Cathy's presentation, you know,
00:14:11
you're talking about negative inflation,
00:14:13
high GDP growth rates, giant
00:14:16
productivity improvements. I don't think
00:14:18
you're going to get there without some
00:14:19
significant labor force disruption.
00:14:22
Okay. So what do you need from let's say
00:14:24
the US government broadly whether it's
00:14:26
the SEC or whether it's maybe new
00:14:29
legislation on Capitol Hill what what
00:14:30
exactly do you need to bring about this
00:14:33
revolution?
00:14:34
I think I think uh relaxation of
00:14:36
accreditation uh standards towards more
00:14:40
self-certification. you you mentioned uh
00:14:43
a test. Um I think a test I consider to
00:14:47
be one form of self-certification,
00:14:50
but the simplest form is just someone
00:14:52
saying, "I understand the risks. I
00:14:54
understand I could lose 100% of what I
00:14:56
put in this investment." You could even
00:14:58
put like a skull and crossbones.
00:15:00
No crying in the casino.
00:15:02
Yeah, exactly.
00:15:02
You could put somebody crying in the
00:15:04
casino. Yes.
00:15:05
Yeah.
00:15:06
Literally in the app.
00:15:07
No crying in the casino. I think
00:15:10
I guess I mean the point you're making
00:15:11
is you can't on the one hand cry for
00:15:14
access and on the other hand cry in the
00:15:15
casino.
00:15:16
Exactly.
00:15:17
Can't do that.
00:15:17
But the executive order on 401k access I
00:15:21
think was a step in the right direction.
00:15:23
So we could also ease into it by
00:15:25
extending that to individual retirement
00:15:28
accounts which are great short-term
00:15:30
vehicles and then give it to
00:15:32
you need a secured interest. Why can't
00:15:34
you just create a synthetic or like a
00:15:36
fast contract saying if and when open AI
00:15:39
goes public cuz you can see how many
00:15:41
shares there are. You know what the
00:15:42
legal registration of the corporation
00:15:43
is. Can't you create like a synthetic
00:15:45
contract that just trades the value of
00:15:47
the stock and ultimately needs to settle
00:15:49
at some point after the company goes
00:15:50
public?
00:15:51
We can't do that currently. Uh and and
00:15:54
OpenAI in particular is a tricky one
00:15:56
because yeah, pick any other LLC or C or
00:16:00
something, right? Um but yeah, we're
00:16:03
we're continuing to look at all angles,
00:16:05
but I I think some clarity would be
00:16:07
helpful
00:16:08
because this is the whole value of of
00:16:09
like sorry Chimat, but like futures
00:16:11
markets and prediction markets is you
00:16:12
can effectively create a synthetic on
00:16:14
some underlying without actually having
00:16:16
ownership or a secured interest in the
00:16:18
underlying or delivery of the commodity.
00:16:20
You could basically just say when this
00:16:21
thing goes public, it's above 20 bucks a
00:16:23
share, below 20 bucks a share on some
00:16:25
number of days after something like
00:16:27
that. But I mean I guess one one
00:16:29
question for you is is that where
00:16:30
prediction markets can take us?
00:16:31
So um the the difference within with
00:16:34
prediction markets is you can create a
00:16:36
prediction market but it has to have an
00:16:38
expiry date for the contract. So for
00:16:40
example we have a prediction market live
00:16:43
on the platform now about which
00:16:45
companies are going to IPO. You could do
00:16:47
something like that. There have been
00:16:49
prediction markets uh in the past, not
00:16:52
on our platform, but some other
00:16:53
platforms that make a market around the
00:16:56
IPO price, but if you just want exposure
00:16:59
to underlying equity in a private, I I
00:17:02
don't think we can do that.
00:17:03
How do you think about, you know, the
00:17:05
one criticism people have had, which is,
00:17:08
hey, we have got a young generation.
00:17:10
They're frisky. They want to take all
00:17:12
this risk. They want to bet. and your
00:17:15
responsibility as a platform that is
00:17:17
giving that access if you're the on-ramp
00:17:20
the education you give and and I
00:17:23
remember with the options and people
00:17:24
being able to short you you came up with
00:17:27
an incredibly elegant solution when you
00:17:29
try to short something you give people a
00:17:31
test you give them education in that
00:17:33
moment before they do it so so how do
00:17:36
you think broadly about young people
00:17:39
getting into wagering they're playing
00:17:41
cards you know they're they're betting
00:17:43
on fantasy football and doing sports
00:17:45
betting, but they also want to, you
00:17:47
know, have their hand in crypto and in
00:17:49
puts and calls and and and pretty
00:17:51
sophisticated stuff. So, what's your
00:17:53
responsibility as a platform then in
00:17:55
introducing them to those sophisticated
00:17:58
um ways of betting and investing?
00:18:01
I have a lot of thoughts actually when
00:18:03
uh you interviewed me for a job in uh
00:18:06
2008, which by the way was the only it
00:18:08
was one of two like final job interviews
00:18:12
that I got. Most people just rejected
00:18:14
me. I never even got a call from from uh
00:18:16
from Google or any of the others, but uh
00:18:19
it was either Weather Bill, later
00:18:21
Climate Corp, uh or Optiver, where I
00:18:24
interviewed to be an options trader. Um
00:18:27
so I got very very close.
00:18:29
We had a math team.
00:18:31
Yeah, I got very close.
00:18:32
Was he like in the interview?
00:18:34
He you probably don't even remember.
00:18:36
You remember Alex Machulka? Yeah, I
00:18:39
think he was uh he
00:18:42
um
00:18:43
I forget my recruiter's name, but that
00:18:45
guy was great. Anyway, um and then I
00:18:48
became an entrepreneur. So uh it might
00:18:51
not surprise you to
00:18:54
know that me personally uh I'm I'm sort
00:18:57
of like adverse to control on the level
00:19:00
of risk that I would take because my
00:19:02
entire career path was sort of like
00:19:05
maximally levered bet on one company
00:19:07
which is the one that I started.
00:19:09
Um so I would be reluctant to discourage
00:19:12
people from being entrepreneurs to doing
00:19:14
what they want to do with their money or
00:19:15
time. Of course, I'm I'm in favor of
00:19:18
like reasonable things like you should
00:19:21
it should be clear to you what you're
00:19:22
investing in. Um but yeah, generally
00:19:26
speaking, I think if it's available to
00:19:28
wealthy people, high netw worth
00:19:30
individuals, it should be made available
00:19:32
to retail as well.
00:19:33
Let me broaden the conversation. Um it
00:19:36
used to be historically we would have
00:19:37
banks, we would have brokerages, we'd
00:19:39
have payment processors, we'd have
00:19:41
merchant acquirers. They were all
00:19:43
disagregated. They could all be public.
00:19:45
they could all build thriving companies.
00:19:47
Now with stable coins and everything
00:19:50
else, there's this creeping convergence.
00:19:53
You're issuing a credit card. Coinbase
00:19:55
has a credit card. SoFi has a federal
00:19:57
banking license. Stripe just launched a
00:20:00
new L1 called Tempo.
00:20:02
Everybody's competing with everybody.
00:20:04
Tell us the scope of where you think
00:20:06
Robin Hood goes in the next four or five
00:20:08
years and what the financial landscape
00:20:13
and infrastructure looks like. The
00:20:15
Visas, the Mastercards, the JP Morgans,
00:20:17
what roles do these companies play as
00:20:20
you guys just become more and more
00:20:22
ambitious and girthy and big and you
00:20:24
know market cap and all that stuff.
00:20:26
Yeah, I think the industry goes through
00:20:28
periods of consolidation and then
00:20:31
divergence. I think Robin Hood has a
00:20:34
unique advantage which is that our
00:20:38
customers put an increasing amount of
00:20:40
their dollars into Robin Hood. So what
00:20:42
we're thinking about and and it became
00:20:44
pretty clear to us as soon as we rolled
00:20:46
out our second product. We kind of saw
00:20:48
what happened. Customers spent more time
00:20:50
on Robin Hood. The two products help
00:20:53
each other. So for example with
00:20:55
retirement we noticed you know the big
00:20:58
question was well if we launch
00:20:59
retirement is it going to cannibalize
00:21:01
the core brokerage business but what we
00:21:03
saw was the opposite. If someone opens
00:21:05
up a retirement account they they tend
00:21:07
to actually increase the amount they put
00:21:10
in their individual account and we saw
00:21:12
that again with the credit card. If
00:21:14
they're a credit card primary user top
00:21:16
of wallet they actually put more money
00:21:19
into into Robin Hood. So then that gets
00:21:22
us to a future where we ask ourselves,
00:21:24
can we be your comprehensive financial
00:21:26
platform? Can you put your direct
00:21:28
deposit into Robin Hood? Can you put all
00:21:31
of your money into Robin Hood? Can you
00:21:33
get to gold subscriber premium status as
00:21:36
soon as possible? And then can we get
00:21:38
all of your family members onto Robin
00:21:40
Hood as well and your kids? So yeah, I
00:21:44
don't think anyone's really thinking
00:21:46
about it from that angle, but I think
00:21:48
that there's going to be over 130
00:21:51
trillion that changes hands from silent
00:21:54
generation and baby boomers to younger
00:21:58
people. And and I think Robin Hood's
00:22:00
actually very well positioned to be one
00:22:02
of the, if not the number one primary
00:22:06
institution that benefits from that
00:22:08
transfer. We've got over a quarter
00:22:10
trillion assets on the platform already,
00:22:12
which seems like a a big number, but
00:22:14
it's actually just a drop in the bucket
00:22:16
compared to what's going to happen.
00:22:18
Where do you see the JP Morgans and the
00:22:20
V Mastercards and Visas? How do they
00:22:21
compete with an elegant product with
00:22:24
hundreds of millions of users that just,
00:22:26
you know, the product velocity that you
00:22:28
have, the risk you're willing to take?
00:22:31
Yeah. I mean, I think that uh if if you
00:22:33
think about an incumbent, they have
00:22:35
certain benefits. They're like very
00:22:37
muscular from a regulatory standpoint.
00:22:40
Like they know how to deal with
00:22:41
regulators. They've got global scale.
00:22:43
They've got, you know, tens, hundreds of
00:22:45
millions of customers, lots of assets.
00:22:48
But the disadvantage is that they're
00:22:51
sometimes slow to adopt new
00:22:53
technologies. They don't have the best
00:22:54
engineering teams. They can't move very
00:22:56
fast. Um, and they they can't hire the
00:23:01
best talent. And and so I think that we
00:23:04
don't have those downsides. We have
00:23:06
great talent. We move really quickly. We
00:23:08
use the best technology. We haven't been
00:23:10
super acquisitive historically, even
00:23:13
though we're doing more. And that
00:23:14
prevents us from being bogged down by
00:23:16
these like massive integration things
00:23:19
that take multiple years. Um, and so
00:23:22
it's a question of can we get the
00:23:24
benefits of scale while also maintaining
00:23:27
the nimleness of a technology startup.
00:23:29
Do you want to give the audience before
00:23:31
we run out of time, maybe last question,
00:23:34
but tell them about the LLM you guys are
00:23:36
building? This is a different project
00:23:37
for you.
00:23:38
Oh yeah.
00:23:38
Um and the goal of that and why you
00:23:40
decided to fund that sort of outside the
00:23:42
scope of Robin Hood.
00:23:44
Yeah. So uh he's talking about Harmonic,
00:23:47
which is a company that I started two
00:23:49
years ago and I'm chairman of and uh
00:23:52
completely separate from Robin Hood. and
00:23:55
and basically the goal there is to build
00:23:58
what we call mathematical super intell
00:24:00
intelligence. So this is um mathematical
00:24:03
reasoning that is uh exceeding the
00:24:08
capability of any individual human
00:24:10
researcher. And we we had a pretty cool
00:24:12
result a couple weeks ago where we
00:24:14
announced gold medal level performance
00:24:17
at the international math olympiad which
00:24:19
is the biggest uh mathematics
00:24:21
competition in the world. And and I
00:24:24
think to my knowledge we were the only
00:24:25
formal model.
00:24:26
You're the only formal one that got IMO
00:24:28
gold. Yeah.
00:24:28
Yeah. So open eye and Gemini. Open eye
00:24:30
Gemini
00:24:32
uh did it with informal
00:24:34
uh Gemini's in formal model got a silver
00:24:37
last year.
00:24:38
Explain why it's going to be so critical
00:24:40
to have a a mathematical super
00:24:42
intelligence model.
00:24:43
Yeah. So two reasons. Um one that has to
00:24:46
do with how these models are trained and
00:24:48
the other which is more of a consumer
00:24:50
painoint. The thing that we've figured
00:24:52
out with formal is how to verify that a
00:24:55
statement is true very precisely. And
00:24:58
when you're doing reinforcement learning
00:25:01
of these models, having a strong reward
00:25:02
signal is very helpful because you can
00:25:05
just discard all the data that's not
00:25:07
helpful and train on the high quality
00:25:10
like correct data. And when you're a
00:25:12
user of these AI models, sometimes they
00:25:14
hallucinate. Uh and and this is actually
00:25:17
not just a consumer problem, but also an
00:25:19
enterprise problem because basically if
00:25:22
you're a software engineer using a
00:25:24
coding model, your job has has become
00:25:27
over the past couple of years, it it's
00:25:29
turned from writing a whole bunch of
00:25:31
high-quality code to reviewing LLM
00:25:34
generated code and making sure that
00:25:36
that's correct. So in a world where
00:25:38
you've got, you know, LLMs producing
00:25:41
thousands and thousands of pages of
00:25:43
code, human verification just doesn't
00:25:46
scale, particularly for backend. So we
00:25:48
want to solve that problem.
00:25:49
Okay, give it up for David Sax's second
00:25:53
favorite.
00:25:56
Good to see you guys.
00:25:58
Thank you. Thanks, brother.
00:26:01
I'll see you in Vegas.