Search Captions & Ask AI

A legal argument can convince judges to drop cases before they reach a jury

April 08, 2018 / 01:45

This episode discusses the dismissal of a murder case involving Marcia Brantley, focusing on the challenges faced by the prosecution.

The legal team explains the difficulties of the case, noting the absence of a body, crime scene, and method of death. They express concerns about the likelihood of not reaching a jury.

Key discussions include the defense's use of a Rule 29 motion for directed verdict, which argues that no reasonable juror could convict based on the evidence presented.

The prosecution reflects on the implications of the judge potentially granting the motion, which would prevent any chance of appeal.

This case illustrates the complexities of proving murder without direct evidence, highlighting the legal strategies employed by both sides.

TLDR

A murder case against Donnie Brantley is likely to be dismissed due to lack of evidence.

Episode

1:45
00:00:00
we're probably going to be dismissing this case on Monday you're going to dismiss this murder case yes this is an
00:00:10
unusual case and it has been a difficult case from the perspective of that we don't have a body we don't have a crime
00:00:16
scene we really don't have a means or method of death as we've reviewed the cases from other jurisdictions and our
00:00:22
trial team sort of looked at what these decisions meant for us we're afraid we won't get to a jury we're afraid that
00:00:29
the judge will enter a judgment of acquittal because we can't prove that Marcia Brantley was murdered give me a
00:00:36
statement about how this all came about last night the defense sent the judge and us their first series of cases that
00:00:44
were based on the same theory as they would argue their rule 29 what's rule 29 in a way that people can understand you
00:00:53
want explain you let me do i rule 29 motion for directed verdict which means at the end of the prosecution's case the
00:01:00
court takes a view of the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecutor and they say can any reasonable juror
00:01:06
convict Donnie Brantley based upon this proof our belief is that had the case gone forward to trial no reasonable
00:01:15
juror could have convicted Donnie because there's no proof and so basically this information told you that
00:01:21
no matter how strong we think are our circumstantial case is that when the prosecution ended its case the defense
00:01:30
could have had a motion to dismiss because there wasn't proof that a murder took place that's correct if he grants a
00:01:37
rule 29 the judge grants it I don't get an opportunity to appeal the state has one opportunity you only get one shot

Episode Highlights

  • The Unusual Case
    This case is challenging due to the lack of a body and crime scene.
    “We don't have a body, we don't have a crime.”
    @ 00m 14s
    April 08, 2018
  • Rule 29 Explained
    A motion for directed verdict that could end the prosecution's case early.
    “What’s rule 29 in a way that people can understand?”
    @ 00m 44s
    April 08, 2018
  • High Stakes for the State
    The state has one opportunity to appeal if the judge grants a motion to dismiss.
    “You only get one shot.”
    @ 01m 41s
    April 08, 2018

Episode Quotes

  • We don't have a body, we don't have a crime.
    A legal argument can convince judges to drop cases before they reach a jury
  • No reasonable juror could have convicted Donnie.
    A legal argument can convince judges to drop cases before they reach a jury
  • You only get one shot.
    A legal argument can convince judges to drop cases before they reach a jury

Key Moments

  • Lack of Evidence00:14
  • Rule 29 Motion00:56
  • One Shot01:41