
This episode features a heated discussion about an investigation involving a person's whereabouts during a specific event. The conversation centers around the tension between the investigator and the individual being questioned.
The main participant insists they were not present at the event in question, despite the investigator's claims. They argue about the validity of the evidence and the implications of being accused of lying.
Throughout the dialogue, the accused maintains their innocence, suggesting the possibility of a clone being involved, which adds a layer of absurdity to the conversation.
The episode highlights the challenges of trust and truth in investigative scenarios, showcasing the back-and-forth between the two parties.
Listeners can expect a mix of tension and humor as the discussion unfolds, revealing the complexities of the situation.
A person insists they weren't at an event despite accusations, leading to a tense and humorous exchange.

Come on, Gil. I mean, I wasn't there.Gilberto Nunez: "I wasn't there ...what do you want me to tell you?"
I wasn't there. So, if there's a clone of me...Gilberto Nunez: "I wasn't there ...what do you want me to tell you?"