00:00:00
but do you think he's innocent I I think the way I approach every single case not
00:00:04
just Clark rockefeller's case is has the prosecution proven this case Beyond A Reasonable Doubt I do not believe that
00:00:12
the prosecution in this case came close to proving this case Beyond a reasonable
00:00:16
doubt you may think that's sour grapes but it doesn't feel that way to me I take a good good look that that's a
00:00:22
premise that means an awful lot to both Brad and I but you won't say he's innocent well we we resp we respect the
00:00:28
jury's process we disagree and we weren't there in 1985 we can't conclusively say what what
00:00:38
what happened we can simply do the same thing that everybody else did was look at the evidence analyze the evidence and
00:00:46
it's our very strong opinion and continues to be that for every single inference that the prosecution ask the
00:00:54
jury to draw from a particular piece of evidence pointing towards guilt there was an equal inference particularly if
00:01:02
you put it in this covering up a con context towards innocent and in our experience in our understanding of the
00:01:11
law whether it's California Massachusetts New York anywhere is that tie goes to the runner it goes to the
00:01:17
defendant and that equals not guilty