Search Captions & Ask AI

Jurors discuss differences in Lovelace investigations

February 21, 2016 / 00:46

This episode discusses the testimony of Dr. Bowman, a pathologist, and the coroner regarding an undetermined cause of death. It highlights the differences between their findings and those of later investigators who relied solely on photographs and reports.

The conversation raises questions about the adequacy of the original autopsy and the potential for additional tests that could have clarified the cause of death. The guests reflect on the challenges faced by the original investigators compared to those who reviewed the case years later.

TLDR

Dr. Bowman and the coroner's findings on an undetermined cause of death are compared to later investigations using only photos and reports.

Episode

0:46
00:00:00
did it bother you that the pathologist who was Dr Bowman's testimony and the coroner at the time came up with
00:00:08
undetermined and they had access to touching the body looking at the body moving the body and actually being there
00:00:15
and doing the tests versus a group of people who came years later and had nothing but pictures and written reports
00:00:22
to go by the best time would have been at the time of the original autopsy and I gathered from some testimony that um
00:00:34
it would have there there would maybe have been a few more tests they could have done to narrow it down a little
00:00:40
more um so that would have been the time to before your best effort

Episode Highlights

Episode Quotes

Key Moments

  • Original Evidence00:22
  • Autopsy Limitations00:26