Why AI Doomers are WRONG about job replacement

Most of our conversations with customers are when they have AI agents, they can actually now go and actually deliver work in areas that would have been unaffordable previously. In the valley, unfortunately, we've been co-opted a little bit somewhat with a little bit of a doomer mindset in some areas. And we think of then AI is okay, like it's all fixed pie, it's going to replace things. And on the ground with large enterprises, the vast majority of the use cases are it's the ability to finally review the contracts that we never got around to reviewing. It's the ability to finally automate an invoice process that we never did. It's the ability to go in and just create

marketing campaigns in every language that we never got around to. So I think that'll probably be actually like 90% of the usage of AI in the future will be things that if we look back and we snap the line right now and we said this is what knowledge work is today. 90% of AI usage will be things that we don't do today. I don't like the word replace because I think actually most of the upside is actually going to be for companies that now deploy labor at things that they wouldn't have deployed labor at