Pentagon Official Explains Anthropic’s Supply Chain Risk Designation
Ask about All-In Podcast
Episode Description
Follow the besties: https://x.com/chamath https://x.com/Jason https://x.com/DavidSacks https://x.com/friedberg
Follow on X: https://x.com/theallinpod
Follow on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theallinpod
Follow on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@theallinpod
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/allinpod
Intro Music Credit: https://rb.gy/tppkzl https://x.com/yung_spielburg
Intro Video Credit: https://x.com/TheZachEffect
Brief Summary
The episode discusses supply chain risks in defense contracting and vendor reliability.
Key points
- Concerns Over Defense Contracts. A speaker expresses deep concerns about defense contractors and their influence on weapon design.
Transcript
Why then designate them a supply chain risk? Why not just abandon them, move on, use the other vendors? Like why take this kind of punitive action? >> I don't view it as punitive. And I'll tell you why. It's if their model has this policy bias, let's call it, based on their constitution, their culture, their people, and so on. I don't want Loheed Martin using their model to design weapons for me. I don't want the people who are designing the things that go into the the componentry to come to me because if that poison if you believe the risk of poisoning threat yes it can enter into any part of the defense enterprise but it's just the defense enterprise. So Boeing wants to use
anthropic to build commercial jets have at it. Boeing wants to use it to build fighter jets. I can't have that because I don't trust what the outputs may be because they're so wedded to their own policy preferences. I worried about them shutting off our system at a moment of need. If you don't want your stuff to be used for department war stuff, you shouldn't be selling to the Department of War. >> Pretty straightforward. >> It's in the name. It's in the name.
